U.S. patent number 3,765,578 [Application Number 05/284,430] was granted by the patent office on 1973-10-16 for twist release safety cap.
Invention is credited to Morton B. Stull.
United States Patent |
3,765,578 |
Stull |
October 16, 1973 |
TWIST RELEASE SAFETY CAP
Abstract
A safety cap for hand-held dispensers, comprising a tubular cap
body having a top discharge opening, a captive closure cap adapted
to fit over the opening of the cap body so as to seal the same,
cooperable yieldable detent means on the cap body and cap tending
to hold the latter firmly on the body, in sealing position, a
flexible hinge web structure connecting the cap body and cap for
holding the latter captive while enabling it to be swung from the
sealing position closing off the body to a discharge position
removed from the opening of the body, and an interference lug and a
lifting tab disposed respectively on the cap body and cap. The lug
and tab overlie and register with each other when the cap has been
swung about the web structure and forced down to its sealing
position on the body. In the sealing position, the cap can be
turnably shifted on the body within limits determined by the web
structure, which is sufficiently long to enable the user to bring
the lifting tab of the cap out of registration with the
interference lug on the cap body, whereby the user's finger can
then be applied to the underside of the lifting tab for the purpose
of removing the cap.
Inventors: |
Stull; Morton B. (Garfield,
NJ) |
Family
ID: |
23090198 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/284,430 |
Filed: |
August 28, 1972 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
222/546;
215/223 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B65D
47/148 (20130101); B65D 50/061 (20130101); B65D
50/045 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B65D
47/12 (20060101); B65D 47/14 (20060101); B65D
50/06 (20060101); B65D 50/00 (20060101); B65D
50/04 (20060101); B65d 047/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;220/40,38.5 ;215/9
;222/92,546,514-516,544,153 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Tollberg; Stanley H.
Assistant Examiner: Stack, Jr.; Norman L.
Claims
I claim:
1. A safety cap for small dispensers of the hand-held type and the
like, comprising in combination:
a. a tubular cap body having a top discharge opening,
b. a captive closure cap adapted to fit the opening of the cap body
so as to seal the same,
c. cooperable yieldable detent means on the cap body and cap,
tending to hold the latter firmly on said body so as to seal the
same,
d. a flexible hinge web structure connecting said cap body and
closure cap for holding the latter captive while enabling it to be
swung from a sealing position closing off the body to a discharge
position removed from the opening of the body,
e. said cap and body having cooperable bearing means enabling the
cap to be turnably shifted on the body within limits as determined
by the said web structure, and
f. said cap body having a radially outwardly projecting
interference lug,
g. said cap having a projecting lifting tab adapted to overlie and
register with said interference lug when the cap has been swung
about the web structure to its sealing position on the cap body, so
as to prevent access to said lifting tab and thus prevent removal
of the cap,
h. said hinge web structure being sufficiently long to enable the
cap, when in its sealing position, to be turned on said bearing
means within said limits so as to shift the lifting tab thereof out
of registration with the interference lug on the cap body whereby a
user's finger can be applied to the underside of the lifting tab
for the purpose of removing the cap.
2. The invention as set forth in claim 1, wherein:
a. said closure cap and cap body have external annular surfaces
which are substantially flush with each other, whereby no
protrusions are accessible on the cap for lifting the same from the
body by means of finger pressure.
3. The invention as set forth in claim 1, wherein:
a. said web structure comprises two flexible hinge webs connected
with the cap and cap body, each to supplement the other for guiding
the cap in its hinging movements.
4. The invention as set forth in claim 1, wherein:
a. said web structure comprises a single web having a zig-zag
configuration.
5. The invention as set forth in claim 1, wherein:
a. said web structure comprises a pair of webs each having a
tenuous configuration.
6. The invention as set forth in claim 4, wherein:
a. said single web is characterized by a pair of reversely curved
portions.
7. The invention as set forth in claim 1, wherein:
a. said web structure has a serpentine configuration capable of
being straightened, whereby it can have a greater effective
length.
8. The invention as set forth in claim 1, wherein:
a. the cap has oppositely disposed shoulders constituting a finger
grip to facilitate turning of the cap by the fingers.
9. The invention as set forth in claim 1, wherein:
a. the tab and lug on said cap and cap body have planar surfaces
facing and closely juxtaposed to one another to prevent insertion
of a tool therebetween for lifting the cap off the body.
10. The invention as set forth in claim 1, wherein:
a. said cap has a smooth external surface for reducing grip
capability thereof by the fingers.
11. The invention as set forth in claim 1, wherein:
a. said interference lug has an incomplete annular configuration
and extends through an arc substantially greater than
180.degree.,
b. said lifting tab also having an incomplete annular configuration
and extending through an arc substantially greater than
180.degree..
12. The invention as set forth in claim 11, wherein:
a. said interference lug and said lifting tab have center portions
located adjacent the hinge web structure.
13. The invention as set forth in claim 1, and further
including:
a. fillet portions integral with said web structure at the juncture
of the latter with the cap body and closure cap, for increasing the
stiffness of the web structure and minimizing the likelihood of
breakage thereof,
b. said web imparting a bias force to the cap, to partially return
the latter toward the registration position thereof when the
twisting force is removed.
14. The invention as set forth in claim 1, wherein:
a. said web structure has a stiffness in an edge wise direction
sufficient to partially return the cap toward the registration
position thereof when twisting force is removed.
Description
BACKGROUND
This invention relates generally to safety closures for small
dispensers, and more particularly to devices of this type which
require rotation of the cap to a predetermined position to enable
its removal from the cap body. In the past, a number of safety
closures have been proposed and constructed. In many cases, the
closure cap was provided with an internal tab which was cooperable
with a discontinuous bead disposed on a bottle neck or cap body. To
effect its removal the cap had to be rotated to a particular
position with respect to the body, wherein the tab was aligned with
and could pass by a notch or discontinuous area of the bead. Other
prior closures involved a cap having an external tab which in the
sealing or closed position, was in close abutment with an external
annular bead on the cap body. The bead had a flat or notch, and
there were no accessible protrusions on the cap for lifting the
same until it was rotated with respect to the cap body so as to
bring a lifter tab into registration with the flat or notch of the
annular body bead. After this was done, the tab could be readily
engaged by the user's finger, to thereby forcibly lift the cap off
the body. Frequently there were marker arrows disposed on the cap
and cap body which provided to the user an indication of the proper
rotary position to which the cap had to be turned if it was desired
to remove the same. While many of these prior constructions
functioned acceptably, there were a number of distinct drawbacks.
In several cases, the reassembly of the cap to the container was
complicated by the fact that the cap had to be oriented to a
particular position in order to enable it to be snapped on. After
such assembly, the cap then had to be rotated in order to bring it
to the "lock" position or condition. In the absence of this last
step, the cap would undesirably remain in an unlocked position. In
such cases, a child who inadvertently found or handled the
container could readily snap off the cap without any initial
unlocking movement to effect registration of marker arrows, or
other safety activity involving rotation of the cap. Thus, some of
the safety features would be lost, merely by careless reassembly of
the cap. Also, many closure caps which were not of the captive type
inevitably become lost or misplaced, which had the effect of
completely defeating the safety closure concept, as can be readily
understood.
SUMMARY
The above disadvantages and drawbacks of prior safety closure
devices are obviated by the present invention which has for its
main object the provision of a novel and improved safety cap which
is extremely simple in construction, reliable in operation and
which can be molded inexpensively as a single plastic piece. A
related object is the provision of a safety cap as above
characterized, in which the closure cap is reliably guided during
reassembly to a fully sealing, locked position wherein the closure
cannot be reopened until the cap is first twisted or turned to
expose a lift tab which can then be engaged by the user's finger to
effect the lifting.
These objects are accomplished by a novel safety closure comprising
a cap body and closure cap held in sealing position thereon by
yieldable detent means, there being a flexible hinge web structure
connecting the body and closure cap. The hinge web enables the cap
to be swung from a sealing position on the body to a discharge
position removed from the body. An interference lug and a lifting
tab are disposed respectively on the cap body and cap; the lug and
tab overly one another after the cap has been swung about the web
structure to its sealing position on the body. The hinge web
structure is sufficiently long so as to enable the assembled cap to
be turned a limited amount with respect to the cap body, to thereby
shift the lifting tab out of registration with the interference
lug, wherein the lifting tab can be readily engaged by the fingers
of the user for the purpose of removing the cap. The hinge web
structure tends to automatically align the lift tab and
interference lug with each other when the cap is swung from an open
position to its sealed position, such that the cap, once sealed,
cannot be removed directly without first being twisted to expose
the lifting tab.
Other features and advantages will hereinafter appear.
In the drawings, illustrating several embodiments of the
invention:
FIG. 1 is a vertical sectional view of a safety cap construction
comprising a cap body and captive closure cap, constituting one
embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 2 is a top plan view of the safety cap of FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 is a bottom plan view of the safety cap.
FIG. 4 is a vertical section of the safety cap of FIG. 1, this view
showing the closure cap assembled to the cap body and occupying a
sealed position.
FIG. 5 is a top plan view of the safety cap of FIG. 1, with the
closure cap assembled to the cap body and occupying a sealed
position.
FIG. 6 is a view like that of FIG. 5 but showing the closure cap as
having been partially rotated so as to expose the lifting tab,
thereof, such that the cap can be lifted by engagement of the tab
by a user's finger.
FIG. 7 is a top plan view of a modified safety cap, constituting
another embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 8 is a top plan view of a further modified safety cap,
constituting yet another embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 9 is a top plan view of a still further modified safety cap,
constituting still another embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 10 is a top plan view of still another form of safety cap,
wherein the interference lug and lifting tab have incomplete
annular configurations and extend through arcs substantially
greater then 180.degree..
FIG. 11 is a top plan view of the cap of FIG. 10, showing the
closure cap assembled to the cap body and occupying a sealed
position.
FIG. 12 is a view like that of FIG. 11 but showing the closure cap
as having been rotated so as to expose a portion of the enlarged
lifting tab, thus enabling the cap to be lifted by engagement of
the tab by a user's finger.
Referring first to FIGS. 1-4 there is illustrated a safety cap 10
for small dispensers and the like, comprising a tubular body 12
having a top discharge opening 14 and a captive closure cap 16
adapted to fit over and close the opening. The safety cap 10 has a
conical undercut retainer bead 17 by which it can be permanently
assembled to a container 19 by means of a force fit. The body 12
comprises an annular sealing lip 18 which closely abuts and forms a
tight seal with an annular sealing skirt 20 disposed in the cap 16.
The body of the safety cap further includes an external annular
detent bead 22 which is cooperable with an annular detent groove 24
on the cap 16 such that the latter is normally held captive on the
cap body 12 when occupying the sealing position as illustrated in
FIG. 2. The detent groove 24 and detent bead 22 are circular with
no interruptions. In addition, the bead 22 and detent groove 24
constitute bearing means disposed on the cap body and cap, enabling
the latter to be turnably shifted on the body. As illustrated in
FIG. 6, the web 26 has sufficient length to enable the cap 16 to
undergo limited turning movement with respect to the cap body
12.
In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a novel
combination of flexible hinge web structure 26 connecting the cap
body 12 and cap 16 and interference lug 28 on the cap body
cooperating with a lifting tab 30 disposed on the cap. The lug and
tab are so arranged as to overlie one another when the safety cap
is in the sealing position illustrated in FIGS. 4 and 5. Referring
to FIGS. 1 and 5, by the construction of the present invention, it
will be readily understood that, as the cap 16 is swung from an
open position (FIG. 1) to a closed position, (FIGS. 4 and 5) the
web structure 26 will automatically tend to align the lift tab 30
with the interference lug 28, thus placing the closure in a locked
position from which it cannot be directly opened, as will be
explained below.
Also as provided by the invention, the cap body 12 and cap 16
preferably have smooth external annular surfaces 32, 34
respectively which closely abut one another along a common edge and
which are substantially flush with one another, as shown in FIG. 4.
The cap and body also have planar surfaces 33, 35, respectively
facing and closely juxtaposed to one another to prevent insertion
of a tool therebetween for lifting the cap off the body. It will be
understood that, once the cap is assembled to the cap body as in
FIG. 5, the cap is firmly held thereon by the cooperable detent
bead 22 and detent groove 24. Due to the fact that the fit
therebetween is moderately snug, and the fact that there are no
protrusions exposed on the cap, it is virtually impossible to
remove the cap when it occupies the position of FIG. 5.
The cap is also provided with oppositely disposed shoulders 37, 39
(FIG. 5) constituting a finger grip to facilitate turning of the
cap by the fingers. As illustrated in FIG. 6, to remove the cap 16,
it is only necessary for the user to grasp the body 12 with one
hand, and the shoulders 37, 39 of the cap with the other so as to
rotate the latter to the position of FIG. 6, wherein the lifting
tab 30 is brought out of registration with the interference lug 28.
Now, with his finger the user simply engages the exposed lifting
tab, and exerts a relatively strong upward force thereon so as to
lift the tab and cap from the cap body, during which the detent
groove 24 is forced past and out of engagement with the detent bead
22. The groove and bead both undergo limited deformation to enable
this removal to occur.
The above construction has a number of distinct advantages. First,
the closure cap is inherently a reliable safety cap, since the
hinge automatically operates to align the lifting tab and
interference lug each time the cap is reassembled to the cap body.
Thus, no additional steps are required by the user, such as
rotating the cap to a "lock position" following reassembly. The
lifting tab is preferably of smaller size than the interference lug
so that precise alignment of the two is not required. By this
arrangement, even if the hinge has taken a temporary step, the lift
tab will still be in alignment with a substantial portion of the
interference lug, such that there will not exist any protruding
portion of the tab by which unauthorized personnel such as small
children could inadvertently open the cap. Finally, by virtue of
the fact that the cap is always held captive, there is no
possibility that it can inadvertently become lost. Since such a
loss would completely defeat the safety closure concept, this
feature of a captive cap is a most important one.
In FIGS. 7-9, there are illustrated modified forms of the safety
closure cap. FIG. 7 shows a cap body 12a and cap 16a connected by a
single web 36 having a serpentine configuration, the web being
characterized by a pair of reversely curved portions 38 and 40.
FIG. 8 shows a single web 42 having a zig-zag configuration,
connecting the cap 16b to the cap body 12b. FIG. 9 illustrates a
pair of flexible hinge webs 44, 46, each web having a tenuous
configuration, and each supplementing the other to thereby guide
the cap 16c when the latter is assembled onto the cap body 12c.
Yet another embodiment of the invention is illustrated in FIGS.
10-12, showing a cap 48, cap body 50 and connecting hinge web
structure 52. In accordance with the present invention, the cap 48
is provided with a lifting tab 54 having an incomplete annular
configuration extending through an arc substantially greater than
180.degree.. The cap body 50 comprises an interference lug 56, also
having an incomplete annular configuration and extending through an
arc greater than 180.degree.. As best illustrated in FIG. 10, the
interference lug 56 and lifting tab 54 have center portions 58 and
60, respectively located adjacent the web structure 52.
The operation of this embodiment of the invention can readily
understood. Following use of the container, the cap 48 can be
reseated on the cap body 50 in a manner analogous to that explained
above in connection with the safety cap of FIGS. 1-6. During the
seating, the hinge 52 operates in such a way as to maintain the
alignment of the lifting tab 54 and interference lug 56. When
seated, the cap 48 will thus have the position illustrated in FIG.
11. Due to the smooth external surface 59 of the cap 48, direct
removal of the latter when it occupies this position is virtually
impossible, since there is little or no gripping surface exposed
thereon. There is a sufficiently tight fit between the cap body
detent bead (22 in FIG. 1) and the cap detent groove (24 in FIG. 1)
so as to maintain the cap in the seated position even in the
presence of a moderate lifting force applied thereto. Removal of
the cap can be readily accomplished however, by gripping the cap
body 50 with the fingers on one hand, and gently rotating the cap
48 to the position of FIG. 12 so as to bring the lifting tab 54 out
of registration with the interference lug 56, and then gently
prying the tab (and cap) upwards with the finger as illustrated. In
this position, sufficient force can be applied to the cap (through
the lifting tab) so as to force the detent groove of the cap over
and out of engagement with the detent bead of the cap body.
The embodiment of FIGS. 10-12 include fillet portions 64 are the
respective ends of the hinge web 52. These fillet portions 64 serve
two important purposes. First, they reduce the likelihood of the
web breaking, particularly where it joins the cap 48 and the body
50. Also, it provides more stiffness in an edge wise direction to
the web, not for bending as in FIG. 11 but with respect to the
twisting force in FIG. 12. This added stiffness is so arranged so
as to be sufficient to return the cap from the twisted portion of
FIG. 12, virtually to the non-twisted, registration position of
FIG. 11, thereby making it still more difficult for a child or
unauthorized person to remove the cap. The biasing force of the web
52 requires the user to not only turn the cap to the FIG. 12
position but also to hold it therein against return movement, while
the lifting force is being applied. The webs 64 can, as well, be
used with the embodiment of the invention illustrated in FIGS. 1-6
to increase the difficulty of unauthorized removal.
From the above it can be seen that I have provided a novel safety
closure cap which is extremely simple in construction, being
essentially a one-piece molded plastic part, which is foolproof in
its operation, and which provides an excellent degree of safety
against inadvertent removal by small children. The cap construction
is thus seen to be a distinct advance and improvement in the field
of safety closures.
Variations and modifications are possible without departing from
the spirit of the invention.
* * * * *