U.S. patent number 3,765,024 [Application Number 05/245,928] was granted by the patent office on 1973-10-09 for antenna array with pattern compensation during scanning.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Societe Lignes Telegraphiques Et Telephoniques. Invention is credited to Bernard Chiron, Louis Duffau.
United States Patent |
3,765,024 |
Chiron , et al. |
October 9, 1973 |
ANTENNA ARRAY WITH PATTERN COMPENSATION DURING SCANNING
Abstract
An array is made of elemental radiators with an adjustable
aperture controlled by a magnetizing field established within a
magnetic section of the radiator. The broadening of the radiation
pattern resulting from large amplitude scanning is compensated
through aperture control of the individual radiators patterns in
the array by means of the magnetizing field within said
radiator.
Inventors: |
Chiron; Bernard (Paris,
FR), Duffau; Louis (Paris, FR) |
Assignee: |
Societe Lignes Telegraphiques Et
Telephoniques (Paris, FR)
|
Family
ID: |
9075743 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/245,928 |
Filed: |
April 20, 1972 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 22, 1971 [FR] |
|
|
7114313 |
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
342/368;
343/911L |
Current CPC
Class: |
H01Q
3/44 (20130101); H01Q 25/002 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H01Q
3/44 (20060101); H01Q 25/00 (20060101); H01Q
3/00 (20060101); H01q 003/26 () |
Field of
Search: |
;343/754,787,788,785,854,911L |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Lieberman; Eli
Claims
What we claim is:
1. An electronically scannable antenna array comprising:
a plurality of elemental radiating units each having a dielectric
non-magnetic radiating unit having an axis of directivity,
magnetic dielectric means integral with said dielectric radiating
unit and symmetrically arranged around said axis of
directivity;
magnetizing means for said magnetic means;
means affording connection of a D. C. current source to said
magnetizing means in order to vary the aperture value of the
antenna without changing the directivity in accordance with the
magnitude of current supplied to said magnetizing means;
a common feed source for said radiating units;
a controllable phase shifting means between said source and said
radiating units;
a control unit for said phase shifting means; and
means for controlling the D. C. current supplied to said
magnetizing means of each elemental radiating unit in order to vary
the aperture value of the elemental beam radiated by said unit so
as to compensate for the aperture variation of the beam radiated by
said array due to scanning.
2. An electronically scannable antenna array as defined by claim 1
in which said phase shifting means are ferrimagnetic phase shifters
and said control unit is a current generator.
3. An electronically scannable antenna array as defined by claim 1
in which said elemental radiating units are Luneberg-type antennas
having a ferrimagnetic core and at least one dielectric shell
surrounding said core.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION AND PRIOR ART
The present invention concerns an antenna array with electronic
scanning.
It is known to perform electronic scanning of the lobe or a
switching of the lobe of an antenna array by varying the relative
phase of the currents feeding identical primary antennas or
radiators arranged as an array. It is also known that the usable
scanning angle is limited by the widening of the pattern due to
scanning.
Copending application Ser. No. 162,444 filed on July 14, 1971 and
assigned to the same Assignee discloses antennas in the form of a
Luneberg sphere, of which at least the central spherical core
consists of ferrimagnetic material and which comprise means for
varying the permeability of the said core. This results in a
variation of the aperture of the antenna. Another variable-aperture
antenna structure having purely electronic control, which consists
of a dielectric rod at least partially coated with ferrimagnetic
material associated with coils is also described.
The object of the invention is to compensate, in the course of the
widening of the aperture due to electronic scanning in antenna
arrays of radiators according to said application.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the invention, the aperture compensated antenna
array consists of at least two radiators as described in said of
one of copending application, comprising means for varying the
relative phase of the microwave currents feeding said radiators,
and means for correlatively varying the magnetic field applied to
the ferrimagnetic elements of the radiators in such manner that the
aperture of the lobe remains constant in the course of the
scanning.
A constant aperture array is the general aim, but it is to be
understood that it is possible to adjust the correlation between
the phase difference which controls the scanning angle and the
magnetic field which controls the aperture angle, so as to follow a
preset law between these two angle values.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the phase difference in
the feeding currents is obtained by means of variable phase
shifters, for example of the ferrite type, to which an adjustable
current is applied, and the desired aperture is obtained by means
of an adjustable current supplied to the coils surrounding the
ferrimagnetic material parts of the elemental antennas. The
constancy of the aperture or the desired "scanning angle/aperture
angle" law is therefore obtained by adjusting currents in relation
to relative phase, which often amounts to adjusting currents in
relation to other currents.
DETAILED DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
A particular embodiment of the invention will now be described in
detail by way of non-limiting illustration with reference to the
accompanying drawings, in which:
FIGS. 1a and 1b illustrate an array of primary antennas of the
prior art, intended to show the variation of the aperture angle in
the course of the scanning,
FIG. 2 shows the scanning lobe obtained with the antenna of FIGS.
1a and 1b,
FIG. 3 illustrates a Luneberg sphere having a ferrimagnetic core in
accordance with the above-mentioned patent application Ser. No.
162,444.
FIG. 4 illustrates an antenna array with lobe aperture and gain
compensation in accordance with the invention,
FIG. 5 illustrates the variation of the scanning angle .alpha. as a
function of the phase difference .phi. for the antenna of FIG.
4,
FIG. 6 illustrates the variation of the lobe aperture .theta. as a
function of the control current of the ferrimagnetic Luneberg
spheres for two different values of the scanning angle,
FIG. 7 illustrates the variation of the current controlling the
aperture of the individual patterns of the elemental radiators as a
function of the scanning angle for obtaining a constant aperture of
the resultant pattern, and
FIG. 8 illustrates an antenna array according to the invention.
FIGS. 1a and 1b illustrate a three-dimensional array of elemental
antennas of the prior art, made of 24 antennas forming a front
curtain and a rear curtain. The front curtain is fed as indicated
in FIG. 1a. The feed of the rear curtain is similar, but the
currents are 90.degree. out of phase. It is known (see for example
"Principles of Radar," McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.1946, pages 9
- 60) that the intensity of the resultant field at a point of a
direction which is at an angle .beta. to the axis Ox and the angle
.alpha. to the axis Oz perpendicular to the array (.alpha.+.beta.=
90.degree.) and remote from r of the array is
.epsilon..sub..theta..sub.m = (60 I.sub.m /r) F.sub.o (.beta.)
F(2.5/2) (.beta.) F(3.5/2) (90) G.sub.1/4 (2.1/4)(.alpha. ) G.sub.p
(2.2/2)(.beta.),
where I.sub.m is the amplitude of the supply current of the primary
antennas, and
G.sub.p.sup.N,n (.alpha.) = [sin N (p-n cos.alpha.).pi.]/[sin (p-n
cos.alpha.).pi.]
F.sup.N,n (.alpha.) = G.sub.O.sup.N.n (.alpha.),
where N is the total number of radiators in a curtain of the array,
n is the distance between adjacent radiators expressed in
wavelengths, and p is the phase difference between adjacent
antennas expressed in fractions of a cycle. In the formula giving
.epsilon..sub..theta..sub.m, p denotes more precisely the phase
difference between the left-hand half of the array and the
right-hand half of the array.
It is possible to obtain lobe scanning by varying p, and FIG. 2
shows the position of the main lobe with p successively taking the
values:
p = 0,1/6, 1/3, 1/2, 2/3, 5/6, 1.
It will be seen that it is possible to obtain a sweep of .+-.
20.degree. by varying p from 0 to .+-. 1/2. However, for the
extreme positions .+-. 20.degree., the secondary lobe has become as
large as the main lobe and if the value is limited to .+-.
14.degree., the aperture angle at 3dB has changed from 22.degree.
at the centre to 30.degree. at the edges. The invention has for its
object to keep this angle constant irrespective of the scanning
angle.
Referring to FIG. 3, the reference numeral 1 denotes a Luneberg
sphere composed of a ferrimagnetic spherical core 2 and of a
polyethylene shell 3 in the form of a hollow sphere, loaded with
titanium dioxide. The permittivity of the sphere 2 is
.epsilon..sub.R = 14.9 and the permittivity of the spherical shell
3 is .epsilon..sub.R =4.0. A waveguide 4 terminated by a flange 5
whose front face is profiled in the form of a spherical surface is
applied to the surface of the sphere 1. The waveguide 4 is seen on
its smaller side in FIG. 3. The microwave electric field is in the
plane of FIG. 3 and the microwave magnetic field is perpendicular
to the plane of FIG. 3. It is obvious that any other feed of the
lens may be used.
A winding 6 surrounds the sphere 2 and is locked between the latter
and the spherical shell 3. This antenna has been more completely
described in the aforesaid patent application.
Referring now to FIGS. 4, 10 and 11 are two antennas in the form of
a Luneberg sphere, of which the core consists of iron-yttrium
garnet (5Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3, 3Y.sub.2 O.sub.3.). The diameter of the
core is 14 mm and that of the sphere is 22 mm. The distance between
the centres of the spheres is 30 mm. The spheres are fed with a
wave at 9 Ghz produced by generator 19 through waveguide 12, which
is doubled into two lines 13 and 14 to feed antennas 10 and 11
respectively. It will be seen that the diameter of the Luneberg
spheres having a core consisting of ferrimagnetic material is here
slightly smaller than the wavelength of the radiated guide. Two
ferrite phase shifters 15 and 16 are located on lines 13 and 14
receiving through the leads 17 and 18 phase-control currents
I.sub.1 and I.sub.2. The windings of antennas 10 and 11 are series
supplied with the same aperture control current I. Currents
I.sub.1, I.sub.2, I are adjusted in accordance with experimentally
determined curves in such manner that the aperture angle does not
vary in the course of the scanning.
FIG. 5 illustrates for the antenna of FIG. 4 the variation of the
angle of rotation of the lobe .alpha. as a function of the phase
difference .phi. introduced by the phase shifters 15 and 16 (the
measure bear on lobes G.phi. .sup.2.2/2 transverse to the direction
joining the centres of the antennas). This law of variation depends
upon the distance between the antennas. For mechanical reasons, the
optimum value has not been used here.
FIG. 6 illustrates the variation of the aperture of the lobe
.theta. as a function of the current flowing through the coils of
the ferrite Luneberg spheres in the case where the number of turns
of each coil is 10. The lower curve corresponds to .alpha. = 0
(.phi. = 0; the two antennas are excited in phase). The upper curve
corresponds to .alpha. = 12.degree. (.phi.= 100.degree.).
Let it be assumed that an aperture .theta. of 28.degree. is to be
maintained in the course of the electronic scanning. It will be
seen that the current I flowing through the windings of the cores
of the Luneberg lenses is 2A (point M). In order to maintain this
aperture in the course of the scanning, i.e. when .phi. increases
in accordance with the curve of FIG. 5, the current in the lenses
must be reduced in accordance with a law experimentally defined
from the set of curves .theta. as a function of I for the
successive values of .alpha.. It will be seen that, for the maximum
value of the scanning angle (.alpha. = 12.degree.) in the example
under consideration, I = 1.3 A (point P).
The angle .alpha. depends upon the phase difference angle .phi.
which in turn, in the case of phase shifters having a ferrimagnetic
core, depends upon the value of a phase shift control current
(I.sub.1 + I.sub.2) (FIG. 7). It will therefore be seen that each
value of .alpha. corresponds to values of (I.sub.1 + I.sub.2) and I
for a given .theta.. Hence, it is possible to supply the phase
shifters and the radiators with two control currents which are
functions of the same angle, for example by means of two
potentiometers having a common shaft of the "function generator"
type.
FIG. 8 illustrates the front curtain of an antenna according to the
invention derived from the antenna having an array of primary
radiators according to FIG. 1. The rear curtain is absolutely
identical to the front curtain, but is supplied with a wave
90.degree. out of phase with that with which the front curtain is
fed.
In the array of FIG. 8, all the primary radiators are ferrite
Luneberg antennas of the type of FIG. 3. There are 12 such antennas
for the front curtain and 12 for the rear curtain. The vertical and
horizontal spacings between antennas are not the same as in the
ideal case of FIG. 1, because the antennas employed have a diameter
which is greater than half the wavelength and therefore cannot be
less than one wavelength apart.
This disadvantage does not arise when the elemental antennas are of
the rod type as described in the aforesaid patent application. All
the antennas 21, 22, 25, 26, 29, 30 of the left-hand half of the
front curtain are fed substantially in phase. All the antennas 23,
24, 27, 28, 31, 32 of the right-hand half of the front curtain are
fed substantially in phase, but with a phase difference of p (in
fractions of a cycle) with respect to the antennas of the left-hand
half. This phase difference is produced by the phase shifters 15
and 16 situated on two waveguides 13 and 14 respectively, which are
connected to the signal source 19 by a common waveguide 12. The
waveguide 13 is divided into two waveguides 7 and 7' and the
waveguide 14 is bifurcated into two waveguides 8 and 8'. The
attenuators 33-36 are introduced into the waveguides 7-8,
7'-8'.
Scanning is obtained by varying the phase difference between the
left-hand and right-hand halves of the front and rear curtains by
means of phase shifters 15 and 16 and homologous phase shifters of
the rear curtain (not shown). The aperture control of the lobes of
the individual radiators of the array of radiators is obtained by
the supply of the coils of the ferrimagnetic-core Luneberg spheres.
The ferrimagnetic-core spheres have been interconnected in a series
of three.
The variation of the current for controlling the permeability of
the ferrite cores of the antennas and the concomitant variation of
the current controlling the phase difference are effected by the
control circuit 37.
It will be apparent to the person skilled in the art, from the
description of FIGS. 4 and 8, how it is possible to construct
arrays of scanning antennas of any desired structure with spheres
having ferrimagnetic cores or dielectric rods having a
ferrimagnetic coating, as primary radiators. Of course, the
microwave supply to the antennas, shown through of waveguides in
the examples, may be effected by means of other types of
transmission lines, such as the coaxial lines, micro-strip.
* * * * *