U.S. patent number 3,765,007 [Application Number 05/251,767] was granted by the patent office on 1973-10-09 for method and apparatus for detecting at a distance the status and identity of objects.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company. Invention is credited to James T. Elder.
United States Patent |
3,765,007 |
Elder |
October 9, 1973 |
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETECTING AT A DISTANCE THE STATUS AND
IDENTITY OF OBJECTS
Abstract
A non-contact system for distinguishing the presence, identity
or status of an object and markers for use therein. The system
comprises a marker including a ferromagnetic material to accompany
each object to be detected, means for producing an alternating
magnetic field within a zone through which the objects are to pass,
means for monitoring magnetic flux changes within the zone and a
circuit for detecting a flux change within the zone which
corresponds to a signal characteristically produced by
magnetization reversal of the marker ferromagnetic material. The
marker comprises "n" sections of a ferromagnetic material and may
include a remanently magnetizable control element to provide a
sensitized and desensitized marker for demagnetized and magnetized
states, respectively, of the control element. A plurality of
magnetic field producing means are employed to produce in the zone
magnetic fields of different orientations, virtually assuring
production of a characteristic signal when a marker is passed into
the zone.
Inventors: |
Elder; James T. (Shoreview,
MN) |
Assignee: |
Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing
Company (St. Paul, MN)
|
Family
ID: |
26941819 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/251,767 |
Filed: |
May 9, 1972 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
840973 |
Jul 11, 1969 |
3665449 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
340/572.3;
340/572.6 |
Current CPC
Class: |
G08B
13/2474 (20130101); G01N 27/72 (20130101); G08B
13/2477 (20130101); G08B 13/2442 (20130101); G08B
13/2437 (20130101); G08B 13/2408 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
G08B
13/24 (20060101); G01N 27/72 (20060101); G08b
013/24 () |
Field of
Search: |
;340/258R,258C,258D,280
;325/8 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Trafton; David L.
Parent Case Text
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
This application is a division of copending patent application Ser.
No. 840,973, filed July 11, 1969, now U.S. Pat. No. 3,665,449, by
James T. Elder and Donald A. Wright.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A marker capable of producing magnetic pulses which can be
unambiguously detected by unsophisticated apparatus out of direct
contact with said marker, said marker comprising "n" sections of
ferromagnetic material, said sections having an aggregate
saturation magnetization of at least 0.1 pole-centimeters and each
section differing from the other sections in A.C. coercivity such
that when subjected to a periodically varying magnetic field which
increases at a predetermined time rate of change, the magnetization
of the sections reverses sequentially at equal intervals of time,
each interval being less than or equal to T/4n where "T" is equal
to the period of said varying magnetic field and wherein each
alternation and set of said sequential reversals produced in
response thereto results in a magnetic pulse train.
2. A marker according to claim 1 wherein said ferromagnetic
sections comprise "n" open-strips.
3. A multi-status marker capable of producing magnetic pulses which
can be unambiguously detected by unsophisticated apparatus out of
direct contact with said marker, said marker further capable of
being deactivated to prevent production of said magnetic pulses
upon interrogation, comprising:
a. "n" sections of ferromagnetic material, said sections having an
aggregate magnetization of at least 0.1 pole-centimeters and each
section differing from the other sections in A.C. coercivity such
that when subjected to a periodically varying magnetic field which
increases at a predetermined time rate of change, the magnetization
of the sections reverses sequentially at equal intervals of time,
each interval being less than or equal to T/4n where "T" is equal
to the period of said varying magnetic field, and wherein each
alternation and set of said sequential reversals produced in
response thereto results in magnetic pulses; and
b. at least one control element of a ferromagnetic material having
a coercivity of at least 5 oersteds producing when remanently
magnetized a static external magnetic field of at least
three-fourths oersted over at least a portion of each section to at
least partially magnetize each said portion whereby the amplitude
and time characteristics of a signal produced by said sections in
response to said applied magnetic field differs distinguishably
from the corresponding signal when the control element is
demagnetized.
4. A marker according to claim 3 wherein said ferromagnetic
sections comprise "n" open-strips.
5. A marker according to claim 4 having at least two control
elements which when remanently magnetized produce a static external
magnetic field over at least two portions of each section.
6. A marker according to claim 4 having one control element which
produces a static external magnetic field of at least 3/4ths
oersted over the entire length of each of said "n" sections of
open-strips.
7. A system for detecting the presence of an object within an
interrogation zone, which object has secured thereto an identifying
marker, comprising:
a. means defining an interrogation zone;
b. means for applying in said interrogation zone a periodically
varying magnetic field which increases at a predetermined time rate
of change;
c. a marker secured to said object, said marker being capable of
producing magnetic pulses, and comprising "n" sections of
ferromagnetic material, said sections having an aggregate
saturation magnetization of at least 0.1 pole-centimeters, and each
section differing from the other sections in A.C. coercivity such
that when subjected to said periodically varying magnetic field,
the magnetization of the sections reverses sequentially at equal
intervals of time, each interval being less than or equal to T/4n
where "T" is equal to the period of said varying magnetic field and
wherein each alternation and set of sequential reversals produced
in response thereto results in said magnetic pulses; and
d. means in the vicinity of said interrogation zone for detecting
said magnetic pulses.
8. A system according to claim 7 further comprising means for
desensitizing said marker to render said marker incapable of
producing said magnetic pulses when subjected to said varying
magnetic field.
9. The system of claim 8 wherein said desensitizing means when in
operation is out of contact with said marker.
10. The system of claim 8 further comprising means for altering
said marker from a desensitized to a sensitized state to render
said marker capable of producing said magnetic pulses when
subjected to said varying magnetic field.
11. The system of claim 10 wherein each marker further comprises at
least one control element of a ferromagnetic material having
coercivity of at least five oersteds capable of producing when
remanently magnetized a static external magnetic field of at least
three-fourths oersted over at least a portion of said sections to
at least partially magnetize said portion whereby the amplitude and
time characteristics of a signal produced by said sections in
response to said varying magnetic field differs distinguishably
from the corresponding signal when the control element is
demagnetized, and wherein said desensitizing means includes means
for remanently magnetizing said control element; and said altering
means includes means for demagnetizing said control element.
12. An object to which is secured a marker which can be detected
without direct contact comprising "n" open-strips where "n" is an
integral number greater than one, of ferromagnetic material as
herein defined with an aggregate saturation magnetic moment of at
least 0.1 pole-centimeter, the magnetization of each of said
open-strips when subjected to a 60 Hz. sinusoidally varying
magnetic test field of a predetermined peak magnitude of less than
20 oersted reversing at each field alternation to in turn produce a
pulse of external polar magnetic field having appreciable flux
components within the range of 1,000 to 16,000 Hz., the gross time
rate of change of which flux components defines a signal having a
width at half amplitude less than 0.1 millisecond, said strips
selected to sequentially reverse their magnetization following a
said applied field alternation at equal intervals of time, each
interval being less than or equal to T/4n where "T" is equal to the
period of said applied field, said sequential reversals producing a
magnetic pulse train which can be unambiguously detected by
unsophisticated apparatus.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates in general to systems and materials for
detection of an object or of the status of an object by use of
alternating magnetic fields. More particularly, the invention
relates to a system in which the object to be detected need not
come in direct contact with the sensing apparatus. The object is
provided with specifically chosen pieces of magnetic material, and
an alternating magnetic field is provided in an area through which
the object is to pass. Upon passage of the object through the area,
the characteristic magnetic response of the specifically chosen
pieces of magnetic material is sensed to distinguish the presence
of the object and either or both the identity or status of the
object.
BACKGROUND
Theft of books from libraries has become a serious problem both in
the form of expense to the taxpayer for replacing stolen books and
in terms of impairment of service rendered by the libraries. The
annual loss of books from all libraries in the U. S. exceeds 20
million dollars and is increasing.
Systems for preventing such theft, in which instruments sensing
evidence of theft actuate alarms, have been known since at least
1934. These systems generally comprise a "marker" element secured
to each object to be detected and instruments for sensing signals
produced by the markers. Obviously, in light of the foregoing
statistics, such systems have been ineffectual.
A particularly serious problem of such theft detection systems is
false alarms. After one or more false alarms, those using the
system tend to ignore all alarms rather than risk being personally
embarrassed or subjecting their establishment to a lawsuit. In
addition to this kind of unreliability, such systems are readily
compromised either by deliberately producing false alarm or
"masking" signals or by shielding the marker to prevent it from
producing a signal.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART
French patent No. 763,681, issued to Pierre Arthur Picard,
discloses a non-contact detection system which employs dynamic
magnetic phenomena to detect the presence of an object, e.g. a
library book being carried through a doorway. The system of Picard
is based upon his discovery that when a piece of metal is subjected
to a sinusoidally varied magnetic field, an induced voltage which
is characteristic of the metal composition is produced in a pair of
balanced coils in the vicinity of the applied field. Analysis of
this characteristic voltage thus permits classification of a metal
present in the applied field. Hence, detection of a book to which a
piece of metal of a special class has been attached is
possible.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a non-contact system for detecting
the presence, identity, or status of an object within an
interrogation zone. The system comprises an interrogation zone,
equipment for applying in the zone a periodically varying magnetic
field which increases at a predetermined time rate of change, a
marker secured to the object and equipment in the vicinity of the
zone for detecting a magnetic pulse train produced in response to a
marker being within the zone when the magnetic field is applied.
The marker is capable of producing such a magnetic pulse train, and
comprises "n" sections of ferromagnetic material, the sections
having an aggregate saturation magnetization of at least 0.1
pole-centimeters, and each section differing from the other
sections in A.C. coercivity such that when subjected to the
periodically varying magnetic field, the magnetization of the
sections reverses sequentially at equal intervals of time, each
interval being less than or equal to T/4n where "T" is equal to the
period of the varying magnetic field and wherein each alternation
and set of sequential reversals produced in response thereto
results in the magnetic pulse train.
In one embodiment, the ferromagnetic sections of the marker
comprise "open-strips". The open-strips are selected such that
their magnetization, when the strips are within and have a major
dimension oriented parallel to a 60 Hz. sinusoidally varying
magnetic test field of a predetermined peak magnitude of less than
20 oersteds, reverses for each alternation of the test field.
In the strictest sense, a complete magnetization reversal from one
saturated condition to a saturated condition of opposite polarity
is not required. By reversal we mean any cyclic magnetization
change of at least 0.2 electromagnetic units per cubic centimeter
in response to an applied field alternation. By an open-strip we
mean one which when magnetized has separate poles, i.e. a strip
which is not closed or wound upon itself. For a particular marker,
the predetermined peak magnitude of the test field is the minimum
field capable of reversing the marker's magnetization, i.e. the
marker's "switching field". By oriented, we mean, for an applied
field of a particular magnitude, the angular relationships between
the applied field and marker major dimension are such that the
applied field's vector component parallel to the marker major
dimension is at least equal to the marker's switching field.
As used herein, "ferromagnetic" includes both conductive and
non-conductive materials. Materials of the former include iron and
its alloys with nickel; the latter class of materials includes
ferrites. Conductive materials are generally preferred; they are
capable of producing external magnetic fields on the order of 10
times greater than those produced by the same amount of
non-conductive materials. Accordingly, a marker of conductive
material may be smaller than an equivalent non-conductive marker.
Such small size has dual advantages; material cost and, perhaps
more importantly for anti-pilferage markers, concealability.
A further distinguishing characteristic of the signal produced by
the "n" sections is that, for a particular composition, size and
shape of material, the peak amplitude of the signal component
produced by each section will occur for an applied alternating
field of a particular waveform a predictable time after each
applied field alternation. This signal characteristic can also be
defined in terms of the absolute instantaneous value of the applied
field at the instant when a particular section's net magnetization
is zero. Hypothetically, it is at this instant that magnetization
"reversal" occurs and we believe it corresponds to the peak point
of the magnetization reversal signal produced by that section. We
shall hereafter call this instantaneous applied field value the "AC
coercivity" of the material, although it should be kept in mind
that AC coercivity depends not only on material magnetic
properties, but also on the waveform of the applied field. It is a
convenient term for comparing responses of different markers
subjected to the same applied field.
The open-strip embodiment of the present invention may take the
form of a thin, flat ferromagnetic ribbon or wire having a magnetic
moment of at least 0.1 electromagnetic unit. The ratio of the major
dimension, i.e. the length, to the square root of the
cross-sectional area of the ribbon or wire should be at least 150.
At ratios below this, internal self-demagnetizing field effects in
highly magnetic materials may increase the switching field beyond
20 oersteds. Also, for ratios below 150, the magnetization reversal
signal amplitude decreases radically and becomes noticeably
dependent upon orientation of the open-strip within the applied
field. The open-strip may have one or more major dimensions
satisfying this criterion.
The corresponding criterion for a thin, flat disc of a
ferromagnetic material would be a ratio of its major dimension to
thickness of at least 6,000. Conductive ribbon or disc markers
should have a thickness of about 0.1 to 130 microns and conductive
wire markers should have a diameter of 10 to 300 microns. For
dimensions greater than these, the amplitude of the magnetization
reversal signal decreases and the width of half-amplitude increases
to become eventually indistinguishable from reversal signals of
many common ferromagnetic metals likely to be carried by a
person.
A thin, flat, narrow marker is particularly amenable for use with
library books as it may easily be concealed either by insertion
into the book binder or between two of the book pages. Commonly, a
book includes two pairs of fly-leafs having a seam joining them
along their entire length. Such seams are normally wider than a
marker and thus a marker could easily be concealed in the seam. Or,
by providing the marker with an adhesive coating on each face and a
carrier web, a marker may be conveniently inserted near the binder
between any two pages.
The preferred number and relative orientations of marker major
dimensions depend upon the applied field characteristics in a
manner which will be explained later. For reference purposes, we
shall define an idealized marker having a single major dimension as
a "one-dimensional" marker, a marker having two major dimensions
perpendicular to each other, e.g. an "L", "T", or "plus " shaped
marker, as a "two-dimensional" marker and a marker having three
mutually perpendicular major dimensions as a "three-dimensional"
marker.
The open-strip embodiment may be wholly inorganic or may comprise
ferromagnetic laminae held together with an organic adhesive; or,
it may be a dispersion of ferromagnetic particles in an organic
binder such as vinyl chloride. It may even be closely spaced but
physically separate ferromagnetic strips held in fixed geometric
relation to each other on or within a nonmagnetic substrate (such
as very fine wire filaments or ribbons within a piece of
paper).
The key feature of the present invention is a marker having two or
more sections of different AC coercivities employed as an integral
unit. Such integrally joined sections, even if in physical contact
with each other, do not magnetically influence each other enough to
prevent each from providing its own characteristic pulse. The
sections may be selected to sequentially reverse their
magnetization following an applied field alternation at equal
intervals of time, each interval being less than or equal to T/4n,
where "T" is equal to the period of the applied field, and "n" is
the number of sections. A sinusoidally varying field is only
increasing during the first and third quadrants, thus such a series
of pulses will occur in those quadrants, i.e., one-fourth of the
total period T, at a point where the applied field has risen to a
valve sufficient to exceed the AC coercivity of the sections and
cause the magnetization to reverse. This series, or burst of
pulses, actually becomes a short time signal having a
characteristic frequency of occurrence whose period is the interval
T/4n, and which can be unambiguously detected by unsophisticated
apparatus.
Yet another suitable marker of the present invention would be the
combination of one or more of the foregoing markers with at least
one "control" element. The objective of a control element is to
permit selective setting of a marker to either a sensitized or a
desensitized state. By sensitized we mean a state in which the
marker will produce a characteristic signal in response to an
applied field. Conversely, by desensitized we mean a state in which
the marker does not produce this characteristic signal in response
to an applied field; instead, the marker will either produce a
different distinguishable signal or fail entirely to produce a
sensible signal.
I have found that a convenient way to prevent or alter
magnetization reversal or a marker, i.e. to desensitize a marker,
is to effectively bias the applied field at the marker by providing
as the marker control element a remanently magnetizable material.
When remanently magnetized, the remanent field of the control
element alternately aids and opposes the applied field on
successive half cycles. By providing a sufficiently large remanent
field adjacent a marker, the net field to which the marker sections
are subjected during each half cycle when the remanent and applied
fields oppose each other is insufficient to reverse the marker
section's magnetization in the characteristic manner. It is not
necesary to completely prevent reversal of the marker section's
magnetization for each applied field alternation. It is sufficient
that reversal be so altered that the resulting signal is
uncharacteristic of a marker. Accordingly, such a magnetic control
element need not completely cover the marker surface. For example,
a magnetized control element adjacent only a central portion of an
open-strip section causes the segments on either side to behave
approximately as two independent open-strips. Thus, the central
portion should be large enough and positioned such that neither of
the segments satisfies the aforementioned ratio criteria.
The remanent magnetization of the control element need not be
uniform; in fact, non-uniformly magnetized control elements are
generally desired because they are less costly to use.
An example of a non-uniformly magnetized control element would be
one magnetized to have a series of bands of remanent magnetization,
adjacent bands being oppositely polarized. Preferably, to minimize
internal demagnetization effects and to provide the greatest
external magnetic field, the respective directions of magnetization
of the bands of such an alternately magnetized control element
should be parallel to the control element length.
Conventional ways of magnetizing a control element are acceptable
for desensitizing the marker. For example, to uniformly magnetize a
control element, it could be exposed to the field of a large
permanent magnet. Or, to provide a "band" type non-uniform
magnetized control, the element could be exposed to a series of
permanent magnets wherein adjacent magnets in the series were
oppositely polarized. Some care is required in removing the
magnetizing magnets. Movement of the magnetizing magnets along the
direction of an axis parallel to the magnet polarizations would
alter or skew said magnet polarizations from that intended. Such
skew might reduce the magnetic influences of the control element to
an amount less than that required to control or desensitize an
open-strip. The use of a single pulsed magnetic field, whose
geometrical field distribution resembles that produced by permanent
magnets, for magnetizing markers would avoid such skew difficulties
since it does not require controlled relative movement between the
marker and source of magnetization while the field is applied.
Means for providing such a field are well known. An example is
"overdamped" discharge of a capacitor through a coil.
To sensitize markers, conventional demagnetizing apparatus based on
the well-known principle of applying a relatively high frequency
and diminishing amplitude magnetic field may be employed. For
example, an apparatus for providing an "underdamped" discharge of a
capacitor through a coil (i.e. a coil-capacitor combination similar
to that which may be employed for magnetizing a control element but
having a high "Q"). Alternatively, a demagnetizing apparatus
comprising a series of permanent magnets in which adjacent magnets
are oppositely polarized may be employed. When a control element
and such a demagnetizing apparatus are moved relative to each other
along a coordinate common to the series of magnets, the control
element is effectively subjected to an alternating magnetic field.
Such a demagnetizing apparatus can also be made to provide a field
of diminishing amplitude through proper selection and arrangement
of the magnets. By selecting the magnets to be of different
strengths and by arranging them in an order ranging from highest to
lowest (relative to the direction of travel) the magnetic field
will appear to diminish in amplitude when passed over a control
element. Magnets of the same field strength arranged like inverted
ascending steps or like an inclined plane so that the amplitude of
the field is progressively diminished would also produce the same
result.
Because the external magnetic field of a control element may vary
depending on the pattern of magnetization, it is not ordinarily
necessary to demagnetize the control element in the strictest
sense; rather, the magnetic influence of the control element need
only be reduced to an extent permitting magnetization reversal of
the marker sections by the applied field.
The control element should have a coercivity of at least 5 oersteds
and be capable of producing when remanently magnetized a static
external magnetic field of at least three-fourths oersted over at
least a portion of an adjacent open-strip. For convenience of
manufacture, the control element may be a thin, magnetic, uniform
coating of gamma-ferric-oxide powder in a vinyl chloride binder on
the surface of the open-strip.
Alternative marker "desensitization" techniques include deformation
or rupture of the open-strip sections such that their resulting
longest linear section is less than that required to satisfy the
aforementioned length-to-square-root of cross-section ratio. Or, a
marker may be desensitized by stressing the open-strip sections to
change their magnetic response. For example, an open-strip may be
employed in conjunction with, or as one element of, a
thermosensitive bi-metallic strip.
Hereafter, in distinguishing between markers comprising "n"
sections of ferromagnetic material and those further comprising one
or more control elements, the markers with "n" sections alone will
be referred to as "single-status" markers. Those markers also
having one or more control elements will be referred to as
"multi-status" markers.
The general requirement of the alternating applied field is that
when a marker passes through the interrogation zone, the marker
becomes oriented with the applied field at at least one, and
preferably several, points in the zone to reverse the marker
magnetization. Oriented was previously defined as the condition
when the applied field vector component parallel to an open-strip
major dimension was equal to or greater than the open-strip
switching field. One combination of applied field and marker which
would absolutely insure orientation would be the combination of a
"one-dimensional" applied field and a "three-dimensional" marker
wherein the strength of the applied field at every point in the
zone was at least .sqroot.2 times the marker switching field. By a
one-dimensional field, it is meant one in which all magnetic lines
of force in the zone are parallel.
In a one-dimensional field, there exist two mutually perpendicular
directions, which are also perpendicular to the field direction,
along which there are virtually no components of the applied
magnetic field. Similarly, a "two-dimensional" field is one in
which there exists only one direction along which there are
virtually no components of the applied magnetic field; and, a
three-dimensional field is one in which there is no direction
devoid of applied magnetic field components. It can thus be seen
that the combination of a one-dimensional marker and a
three-dimensional field, a two-dimensional marker and a
two-dimensional field, and a three-dimensional marker and
one-dimensional field, would absolutely guarantee "orientation" at
each point in the zone.
With such combinations, the length of the path traversed by a
marker passing through the zone could be very short, only slightly
longer than the length of an open-strip. By increasing the path
length, such an ideal combination which would assure orientation of
the marker at every point in the zone is not required. To virtually
assure at least one magnetization reversal whenever an open-strip
passes through a zone having a relatively long path length, it is
only necessary that magnetic field component vectors greater than
the marker switching field along every direction of the unit sphere
be present at many points in the zone.
This condition may be satisfied by producing sequentially, in time,
at each point in the zone three one-dimensional fields, each of the
fields being oriented along a different coordinate axis of the unit
sphere. Alternatively, the condition may be satisfied by providing
along the path through the zone a plurality of regions in which the
applied field orientation does not vary, the fields of successive
regions, however, being oriented differently.
In addition to the length of the zone through which the marker is
to pass, other significant interdependent variables for designing a
particular system which will insure at least one magnetization
reversal of a marker passing through the zone include: the marker
velocity, the number and orientation of the major dimensions of the
marker sections, the applied field alternation rate, the peak
magnitude of the applied field, and the applied field vector
components at each point in the zone at each instant in time. Such
an alternating field may also be in the form of a damped
oscillating pulse or a modulated sinusoidally varying field. One
such embodiment is to provide a second alternating magnetic field
having a frequency at least 5 Hz. different than the first applied
alternating field.
The alternating magnetic field may be produced by conventional
methods, such as by application of an alternating current to an air
core loop or to a coil of an electromagnet or by moving a permanent
magnet such that the permanent magnet's field is made to
effectively alternate throughout the interrogation zone.
General requirements of the flux monitoring system and detecting
circuit are that it monitor magnetic flux changes within the
interrogating zone and discriminate between magnetic flux changes
produced by each marker section, and between all extraneous
magnetic flux changes. Extraneous flux changes include the applied
field, noise produced by electric motors, circuit breaker noise,
etc., whose effect upon the sensor is dependent to some extent upon
their strength and distance from the interrogating zone. Examples
of magnetic flux monitoring means include types which indicate the
rate of change of the field directly, as a coil, and types which
indicate the instantaneous magnitude of the field from which the
field rate of change can be derived. The latter includes
magnetoresistive devices, Hall devices, and magnetodiode sensors.
Both types may be used with flux gathering devices to improve their
sensitivity. The coil type include at least one coil for
inductively sensing magnetic flux. One large coil may be used with
only a few turns, even as few as a single turn; or several small
coils, each having relatively more turns, may be used. Small coils
have the advantage of being less sensitive to magnetic noise such
as that produced by electric motors and circuit breakers. On the
other hand, one large coil responds more uniformly to a marker at
different positions in the zone than do the individual small coils.
Any number of coils may be arranged in opposition so that magnetic
noise from a distant source can be minimized, while detecting a
marker closer to one coil than the other. Further, when a plurality
of coils are employed, they may be provided with individual
detecting systems or may sequentially share a common detecting
system.
The signal detecting circuit associated with the flux monitoring
means, in its simplest form, will indicate the presence of a marker
in the interrogating zone by sensing the magnetic pulses
corresponding to a single magnetization reversal of a marker.
Implicit in an anti-pilferage system is initiation of some
prescribed action upon detecting or sensing of an apparently stolen
object. The particular action initiated is incidental to the
operation of the present invention but may include production of
electromagnetic or sonic waves such as light, ultrasonic
transmissions or radio transmissions, either or both immediate to
or remote from the interrogation zone. Action may consist of making
a video or photographic record of the persons present in the
interrogation zone at the time of sensing an apparently stolen
object, or disablement of the automatic door opening mechanism of
one or more exits. To complicate intentional compromise of the
system, visible or audible indications may be slightly delayed from
the instant of detection.
The same general sensing circuit may be employed for both a
single-status and a multi-status marker. The signals produced by
each marker section when an associated control element is
demagnetized are substantially the same as those produced when the
strips are employed as a single-status marker. However, when the
control element is magnetized, the shape, amplitude and time
occurrence of the signals are changed. The sensing circuit, in
detecting such changes, can thus in essence sense the magnetization
of the control element.
As applied to protection of the books in a library, it is readily
apparent that by employing a multi-status marker, books may be
desensitized during checkout to permit removal of the book from the
library. Conversely, upon return of the book, it may be
conveniently sensitized to prevent undetected removal of the book
from the library, until it is again properly checked out.
With such sensitization and desensitization, the exact location of
a marker need not be known. Accordingly, clever concealment of one
or more markers on an object renders a system of the present
invention virtually invulnerable to compromise as by shielding or
removal of the marker.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
A preferred embodiment of a multi-status marker particularly
amenable for use in protecting the stock of a library comprises "n"
open-strip sections, one consisting of an annealed permalloy ribbon
of composition 4% molybdenum, 79% nickel and 17% iron about 25
microns thick, 18 centimeters long and 0.6 centimeter wide, each
section differing from the other sections in A.C. coercivity. A
suitable control element is formed of a gamma-ferric-oxide strip of
the same width and length as each open-strip. Such a control
element may be produced by first dispersing 100 parts by weight of
a recording-tape grade gamma-ferric-oxide pigment and 2 parts by
weight of a wetting agent such as Ross and Rowe Yelkin TTS with a
solvent such as toluene to produce a mixture of 25% solids. To this
is added fifty parts by weight of a resin composition, e.g. 75% of
a copolymer of 89 parts vinyl chloride and 11 parts vinyl acetate
(VYHH) and 25% dioctyl phthalate. A small amount of a mixture of
equal parts of methyl ethyl ketone and toluene may be also added as
required to make a coatable solution. The solution is knife-coated
on a silicone coated release sheet. After the solution has dried,
the release sheet is peeled away and strips of the dried solution
of a uniform 230 micron thickness are selected for use as control
elements. For the previously described open-strip, thicknesses of
230 microns have been found to be sufficient to desensitize the
open-strip when the control element is magnetized by a one-inch gap
magnetron magnet. Each element is then laminated to an open-strip.
For more efficient production of large quantities, the mixture may
be coated on a wide sheet of the open-strip material which is then
subsequently slit into 0.6 centimeter wide strips.
These and other characteristics and advantages of the invention
will become more apparent when considered in light of the following
description of preferred embodiments taken in light of the
accompanying drawings wherein:
FIG. 1 is a combinational block diagram and schematic wiring
diagram of an anti-pilferage system such as may conveniently be
used at the exits of a building in which the objects to be
protected are kept;
FIG. 2, View A, is a front elevational view of a preferred
embodiment of the applied field producing means of the system of
FIG. 1; and FIG. 2, View B, is a schematic illustration of the
windings of a portion of the applied field producing means of View
A;
FIGS. 3 and 4 show representations of magnetic fields produced by
the applied field producing means of FIG. 2;
FIG. 5 in three views is a superimposition of two sets of magnetic
field lines of the applied field producing means of FIG. 2;
FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of the field
sequencing circuit of FIG. 1;
FIG. 7 is a perspective view of a book containing a single-status
marker comprising "n" strips of ferromagnetic material adjacent the
back cover of the book;
FIG. 8 is a perspective view of a book showing a multistatus marker
comprising "n" strips of ferromagnetic material together with
control elements concealed inside the heel of the book;
In FIG. 1, three zone units, 10A, 10B and 10C, are shown positioned
to form a pair of exit ways, the spaces between opposing units 10A
and 10B and between 10B and 10C each thus forming an "interrogation
zone". For the exemplary embodiment shown, zone units 10A and 10C
comprise field producing and flux monitoring means whereas unit 10B
includes only field producing means.
Unit 10A is partially cut away, revealing a pair of electromagnets,
12A and 12B, an air core loop 14, and four smaller coils, 16A, 16B,
16C and 16D. The electromagnets and air core loop form an applied
field producing means and each have a terminal (for reference
purposes, an "input" terminal) coupled to a "hot" lead 18 of a
filtered alternating current source and another "output" terminal
respectively coupled to a field sequencing circuit 20 by leads 22,
24 and 26. Units 10A and 10C are identical, but unit 10B differs in
that it does not contain the four smaller coils. These smaller
coils, each formed of 900 turns of enameled wire 0.01 centimeter in
diameter wound in a bundle around a form 10 centimeters in
diameter, form a magnetic flux monitoring means, designated as 29.
They are connected in series with RG 58 A/U coaxial cable, placed
in separated locations on one side of the interrogating zone, and
very carefully oriented to balance out as much as possible of the
magnetic noise produced by the field producing means and other
sources. In the embodiment shown, the upper coils 16A and 16B are
shown oriented vertically and the lower coils 16C and 16D are shown
horizontally oriented. Each coil is wrapped with one layer of 12.7
micron-thick aluminum foil (not shown) to shield it from
electrostatic noise while permitting magnetic signals to pass.
These foil shields are connected to the shield of the
inter-connecting coaxial cable.
Coupled to the magnetic flux monitoring means of unit 10A by
coaxial cable 28 is a signal detector circuit 32A; an identical
signal detector 32B is coupled by coaxial cable 30 to the magnetic
flux monitoring means of unit 10C. When a book 31 carrying a
sensitized marker 33 passes into an applied field interrogating
zone, the marker magnetization reverses at each applied field
alternation to produce a magnetic pulse train. The flux monitoring
means of that zone responds to this change in magnetic flux within
the zone and provides a signal corresponding to the pulse to its
associated detector circuit 32. The detector circuit responds to
the pulse train and provides a signal for activating its alarm and
indicator circuit 34.
FIG. 2, View A, is a front elevational view of a preferred
embodiment of a zone unit 10A. The electromagnets 12A and 12B of
the applied field producing means are each formed by solenoids
surrounding a 5.1-centimeter square bar. The bars are laminates
formed of 0.0457-centimeter thick by 142-centimeter long by
5.1-centimeter wide sheets of transformer steel, type M-19. Each
solenoid comprises a pair of 125-turn windings of 0.205-centimeter
diameter enameled wire distributed uniformly along the length of
the bar and an additional pair of 60-turn windings of enameled wire
0.259 centimeter in diameter at each end. Both additional 60-turn
windings are uniformly wound in a bifilar aiding fashion with the
end-most 60 turns of the corresponding 125-turn windings.
The 60-turn windings 36A and 36B are wound in series with each
other and in series with the parallel combination of 125-turn
windings 38A and 38B as shown in FIG. 2, View B. This combination
of windings is referred to herein as the coil "winding", and its
"input" terminal is shown as 35 and its "output" terminal is shown
as 37. We have found that the poles of the polar magnets are
located approximately 7.5 centimeters in from the bar ends.
A pair of applied field producing means separated by about one
meter and of the foregoing dimensions is suitable for providing an
interrogation zone of about one meter by two meters by two
meters.
An air core loop 14 of the preferred embodIment is simply a
multiturn closed loop. For the preferred embodiment shown, loop 14
is circular and has a diameter equal to the pole separation of
electromagnets 12, and is made of 80 turns of enameled wire 0.205
centimeter in diameter. If the electromagnets were not of the same
length, the loop geometry would remain curvilinear but would be
adjusted so that the loop periphery still passed adjacent the poles
of both polar magnets for reasons which will become apparent
following a discussion of the relationships between the
electromagnet and air core loop magnetic fields.
FIGS. 3 and 4 illustrate free space characteristic magnetic fields
of an electromagnet and an air core loop respectively, such as
those of FIG. 2. (The figures illustrate the magnetic field lines
lying in the plane of the paper.) As shown, the field of the
vertically oriented electromagnet includes components which are
vertical (parallel to the "y" axis) and also includes significant
horizontal "x" components in the regions near its poles. Similarly,
the magnetic field components of the air core loop include
components parallel to the "x" axis and components parallel to the
"y" axis.
By passing the air core loop adjacent the electromagnet poles, the
two forms of field producing means complement each other. This will
become more apparent following a discussion of the views of FIG. 5
wherein a superimposition of two free space magnetic field lines
from each of means 12A, 12B and 14 of one zone unit are shown. For
the sake of clarity, the lines representing the field produced by
means 12A are shown uniformly dashed; the lines representing the
field produced by means 12B are shown in alternately long and short
dashes; and the lines representing the field produced by means 14
are shown in solid lines. As shown, one set of lines intersects at
point M; the other at point N. A vector representation of the
angular relationship of the magnetic field strengths is shown at
Views B and C of FIG. 5 for points M and N respectively. Components
r, s, t of View B represent the magnetic field strength of the
fields at point M respectively produced by means 12B, 14, and 12A;
components r', s', t' of View C are corresponding magnetic field
strength vectors of the fields at point N. As shown, the components
of each set are almost mutually perpendicular even though the r, s,
t component directions are different from the r' , s', t'
directions. Inspection of FIG. 5 makes it readily apparent that the
vector components of intersections of other sets of lines will be
nearly perpendicular, too. Accordingly, by proper selection of
individual magnetic field strengths, means 12A, 12B and 14 would
produce a nearly ideal field.
By producing fields of not less than .sqroot.2 times the marker
open-strip switching field, such fields, even in the interrogating
zone extremities adjacent the ends of the polar magnets where the
respective directions of the fields change rapidly, are nearly
"ideal" or "three-dimensional". Of course, an absolutely uniform
three-dimensional field is not required because it is virtually
impossible that a marker could pass through an entire zone without
the marker becoming oriented at least once with a component of the
applied field which is greater than the marker switching field.
The fields of FIGS. 3, 4 and 5 are those which would be produced
absent any external magnetic influence. Thus, for the embodiment of
FIG. 1, wherein three zone units are shown, the middle zone unit
cooperating with each of the other two to form a pair of
interrogating zones, it would be necessary to consecutively
energize each of the nine individual field producing means in order
to produce fields as shown. Because of the relatively long path
length, for the reasons previously set forth, sequential production
of the nine fields is unnecessary. Indeed, it may be undesirable,
for the peak amplitude of currents driven through the windings of
the electromagnets and air core loops, and hence the associated
circuitry costs, can be reduced by simultaneously producing one
field of each zone unit.
FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of the field
sequencing circuit 20 of FIG. 1. The particular circuIt shown in
FIG. 6 simultaneously turns on like field producing means of each
of the three zone units, and sequentially turns on each of the
three separate means. The basic sequencing cycle thus consists of
three phases, each phase lasting eight complete cycles of the AC
line voltage.
With reference to FIG. 6, the field sequencing circuit is shown to
comprise, each shown generally, a power line filter 39, a phase
selector 40, phase timer 42 and a stepdown transformer 44. Power
line filter 39 is included in the field sequencing circuit to
minimize noise on the power line and is shown to comprise an
inductor 41 in series with the hot line of a 117 volt power source
43 and a capacitor bank 45 coupled between the hot lead 18 and
common line 47. Inductor 41 is comprised of 130 turns of enameled
wire 0.259 cm in diameter wound in a bundle about 4 centimeters
wide around a form 18 cm in diameter. Preferably such a coil would
be cast in a potting compound such as an epoxy resin after winding.
Capacitor band 45 is comprised of a number of AC capacitors in
parallel, each having a voltage rating greater than 117 VAC, and
totaling about 450 microfarads capacitance. Although the primary
function of these capacitors is to reduce the effects of harmonic
noise on the power line, their exact value should be chosen so that
they also operate to compensate for the poor power factor presented
by the field producing coils. This is done by adding capacitors
while observing the AC current drawn from the line, and stopping
when this current reaches a minimum.
Phase selector 40 is shown to comprise a modulus 3 ring counter 46
and three identical line switches (one for each phase) shown
generally as 48, 50 and 52, with switch 48 connected by lead 54 to
the counter phase "1" output, switch 50 connected by lead 56 to the
counter phase "2" output and switch 52 connected by lead 58 to the
counter phase "3" output. The modulus 3 ring counter input is
coupled to the output of phase timer 42. Phase timer 42 comprises a
modulus 8 binary counter 62 (three cascaded integrated circuit
toggle flip-flops). Counter 62 has its input driven by a Schmitt
trigger 64 which in turn has its input coupled by lead 66 to the AC
line voltage hot lead 18.
In operation, the Schmitt trigger circuit switches states at about
zero volts for each negative-to-positive line voltage transition,
switching just before the voltage crosses zero. At this instant,
transistor 68 conducts and also switches on transistor 70. This
causes the voltage at input pin 72 of integrated circuit flip-flop
74 to drop sharply, toggling the flip-flop and incrementing counter
62 by one. When the counter reaches a count of seven cycles, the
next line voltage negative-to-positive transition will cause it to
revert to zero. At that time, the output terminal of flip-flop 76
will drop sharply in voltage, sending a negative pulse through
capacitor 78 to the base of transistor 80. Normally, transistor 80
is biased into saturation by resistor 82. However, this short
negative-going pulse turns the transistor off momentarily, to
increment by one the Modulus 3 ring counter 46 formed by
transistors 80, 84, 86 and 88, in a manner well known in the art.
Thus, such negative pulses are the counter 46 "input" pulses. Only
one of transistors 84, 86 and 88 is normally conducting and upon
receiving an input pulse that transistor stops conducting and the
next transistor in the sequence conducts. Transistors 84, 86 and 88
respectively correspond to phases "1", "2" and "3" of phase
selector circuit and thus it can be seen that said transistors
provide a sequence of three phases, each phase lasting for the
modulus of counter 62, which for the particular embodiment is 8
alternations of the line voltage.
The outputs of counter 46 are coupled to identical line switches
48, 50 and 52, only one of which, 48, is shown schematically; the
counter phase "1" output is coupled to switch 48 by lead 54, the
counter phase "2" output is coupled to switch 50 by lead 56, and
the counter phase "3" output is coupled to switch 52 by lead 58.
The line switch operation will be described with reference to
switch 48, although it is to be understood that operation of
switches 50 and 52 is similar. Switch 48 is shown to include
normally nonconducting transistors 90, 92, 94, 96 and 98. The
collectors of transistors 92, 94, 96 and 98 are respectively
coupled to gate leads of triacs 100, 102, 104 and 106.
"Load-switching" triacs 100, 102 and 104 are bi-directional
conducting devices having their anodes respectively coupled to an
output winding of like field producing means of zone units 10A, 10B
and 10C and also having their anodes commonly resistively coupled
to the anode of triac 106. Triacs 100, 102 and 104, when
conducting, thus permit alternating current flow through the
windings of each of horizontal electromagnet field producing means
12B of zone units 10A, 10B and 10C.
The function of triac 106 is very important to false-alarm-free
operation of a field sequencing circuit such as that of FIG. 6,
because of the noise spikes which the load switching triacs produce
each time they pass from one quadrant of operation to another, i.e.
to switch from a negative to a positive conduction state or vice
versa. If such a switching instant occurs at nearly the same time
as the corresponding load current alternation instant, the marker
characteristic signal will be masked by the load switch noise
spikes because it too occurs at about the load current alternation
point. Triac 106 prevents such masking by causing the load switch
to switch states sufficiently in advance of the load current
alternation that the noncommitant noise spikes have decreased
adequately to prevent masking of a marker signal. Because of the
inductance of the field producing means windings, the current from
said coils appearing at the anodes of triacs 100, 102 and 104 will
lag the current appearing in the secondary winding of transformer
44. By connecting the cathode of triac 106 to said secondary
winding such that the polarity of the current passed through
resistors 108, 110 and 112 to the anodes of the load switches
opposes the load current for the part of each half cycle where the
load current is approaching zero, the switching instants of said
load switches are caused to lead the corresponding load current
alternation in the field producing means windings. Because the
marker magnetization reversal of the present embodiment lags the
corresponding field producing means current alternation, it is
preferable that the transformer secondary winding be connected
across triac 106 as shown; were the connection reversed, the load
switch switching instant would lag instead of lead line current and
hence the load switch noise spikes might mask a marker signal.
FIG. 7 is a perspective view of a book 250 provided with a marker
252 comprising "n" single status open-strip sections 254, 256, 258
and 260 of ferromagnetic material adjacent a rear cover of the
book. At least three sections, 254, 258 and 260, labeled as "1",
"n-1" and "n" are required to produce at least three separate
magnetic pulses, so as to provide the necessary equally spaced
intervals therebetween. Section 256 depicted in dashed lines, is
used to represent a number of sections determined by the value of
"n".
FIG. 8 is a perspective view of a book 262 provided with a
concealed multi-status marker 264. A portion of an outer covering
266 over the heel of the book is shown broken away to reveal the
marker 264, which comprises "n" sections 268, 270, 272 and 274.
Sections 268, 272 and 274 are representative of section numbers
"1", "n-1" and "n" respectively. Section 270, shown in dash lines,
represents optional sections, the number of which depends upon the
value of "n". Sections 268, 270 and 272 consist of open-strips 276
to which are laminated control elements 278 extending the full
length of each open-strip. Section 274 consists of an open-strip
280 to which is laminated control elements 282 and 284, each of
which extends over only a portion of the open-strip 280.
The placement and selection of either a single or multi-status
marker is entirely arbitrary, the showing in FIGS. 7 and 8 being
merely exemplary of possible placements and uses for the markers of
the present invention.
The present invention has utilities other than protection against
theft of library books or other articles of merchandise. For
example, the system may be used for sortation. Objects belonging to
one class may be each provided with a marker having "n" open-strip
sections having AC coercivities selected to produce a pulse train
having first characteristic frequency, while objects belonging to
another class would be provided with a marker having open-strip
sections having AC coercivities selected to produce a pulse train
having second characteristic frequency, etc. Accordingly, objects
may be sorted into groups by the frequency of their characteristic
signals. Similarly, strips of different coercivities may be
combined to form a binary code. Each bit of the code would
correspond to strips generating a particular frequency. The
presence or absence of marker strips generating a particular
frequency would correspond to a "0" or "1" for the digit or "bit"
position corresponding to those strips. A selectively alterable
marker may be provided by including all strips in every marker and
by providing each strip with a control element of the type
previously described.
It is to be recognized that each library book could be provided
with machine readable indicia of the book's identity, e.g. the
book's Library of Congress number. By automatically desensitizing a
book's marker in response to decoding and recording both these
indicia and the pertinent data on a user's identity card, an
automated checkout system is provided.
* * * * *