U.S. patent number 3,764,539 [Application Number 05/080,580] was granted by the patent office on 1973-10-09 for flexible ferrite permanent magnet and methods for its manufacture.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Community Building Association of Washington, Indiana, Inc.. Invention is credited to Alexander R. Cochardt, Alexander W. Cochardt, Philip A. Cochardt.
United States Patent |
3,764,539 |
Cochardt , et al. |
October 9, 1973 |
FLEXIBLE FERRITE PERMANENT MAGNET AND METHODS FOR ITS
MANUFACTURE
Abstract
A flexible permanent magnet is described that contains
single-crystalline ferrite particles embedded in an elastomeric
binder. The ferrite particle size is much larger than that of the
ferrites in the prior-art flexible magnets which results in greatly
improved magnetic and mechanical properties. The large-size,
single-crystalline ferrite particles are obtained by preparing a
highly oriented, fully sintered hexaferrite and by pulverizing the
hexaferrite into a relatively coarse powder.
Inventors: |
Cochardt; Philip A. (Export,
PA), Cochardt; Alexander R. (Export, PA), Cochardt;
Alexander W. (Export, PA) |
Assignee: |
Community Building Association of
Washington, Indiana, Inc. (Washington, IN)
|
Family
ID: |
22158285 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/080,580 |
Filed: |
October 14, 1970 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
252/62.54;
252/62.53; 252/62.56; 252/62.59; 252/62.63; 252/62.64 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H01F
1/113 (20130101); H01F 13/003 (20130101); H01F
1/117 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H01F
1/032 (20060101); H01F 13/00 (20060101); H01F
1/113 (20060101); H01F 1/117 (20060101); H01f
001/117 () |
Field of
Search: |
;252/62.53,62.54,62.63,62.64,62.59,62.56 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
717,462 |
|
Jul 1965 |
|
CA |
|
860,220 |
|
Feb 1961 |
|
GB |
|
Primary Examiner: Wyman; Daniel E.
Assistant Examiner: Demers; A. P.
Claims
We claim as our invention:
1. In the method of making flexible permanent magnets, the steps
comprising reacting iron ore powder with a divalent metal oxide MO,
wherein M stands for at least one element from the group Ba and Sr
and which may also include small amounts of the elements Pb and Ca
to form a ferrite, Pb, when present, not exceeding about 1.6 wt% of
the ferrite and Ca, when present, not exceeding 2 wt% of the
ferrite, pulverizing said ferrite into particles of near
single-domain size, aligning said particles in a magnetic field,
sintering the aligned particle agglomerate into a multi-domain
ferrite having predominantly single crystal characteristics,
pulverizing said ferrite into a powder, preparing a mxiture of
elastomeric binder with at least a portion of said ferrite powder,
molding the mixture, and magnetizing at least a portion of the
molded pieces.
2. In the method of making flexible permanent magnets, the steps
comprising aligning ferrite particles in a magnetic field, said
ferrite particles having the composition Mo .sup.. k Fe.sub.2
O.sub.3 wherein M represents at least one element selected from the
group consisting of barium and strontium and wherein k lies between
4.5 and 5.5, sintering the aligned particle agglomerate thereby
producing multidomain ferrites having predominantly single crystal
characteristics, pulverizing said ferrites into a powder, preparing
a mixture of elastomeric binder with at least a portion of said
powder, molding the mixture, and magnetizing at least a portion of
the molded pieces.
3. In the method of making lead-free flexible permanent magnets,
the steps comprising reacting iron ore powder with a divalent metal
oxide MO, wherein M stands for at least one element selected from
the group consisting of Ba and Sr to form the ferrite MO .sup.. k
Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 wherein k lies between 4.5 and 5.5, milling said
ferrite in water with steel balls, pressing the slurry in a
magnetic field and aligning the ferrite particles, sintering the
aligned particle agglomerate into a multi-domain ferrite having
predominantly single crystal characteristics, pulverizing said
ferrite into a powder, preparing a mixture of elastomeric binder
with at least a portion of said ferrite powder, extruding the
mixture into a strip, and magnetizing at least a portion of the
extruded strip.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein the ferrite component of the
flexible strip has an average particle size of from at least 2
.mu.m up to about 10 .mu.m and contains at least one addition
selected from the group consisting of from 0.1 to 1 wt% SiO.sub.2,
0.1 to 1 wt% CaO, from 0.1 to 1 wt% Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 and from 0.05
to 1 wt% of a sulfate from the group consisting of SrSO.sub.4,
BaSO.sub.4, CaSO.sub.4 and NaSo.sub.4.
5. A flexible permanent magnet containing multi-domain ferrite
particles embedded in an elastomeric binder, said ferrite particles
having predominantly single crystal characteristics and having an
average particle size of from at least 2.mu.m up to about 10 .mu.m,
said ferrite particles having the composition MO .sup.. k Fe.sub.2
O.sub.3 wherein M represents an element selected from the group
consisting of barium and strontium and wherein k lies between 4.5
and 5.5.
6. The flexible magnet of claim 5 wherein M includes small amounts
of one or both of lead and calcium, lead, when present, not
exceeding about 1.6wt% of the ferrite and calcium, when present,
not exceeding 2 wt% of the ferrite.
7. The flexible magnet of claim 5 wherein the ferrite contains at
least one addition selected from the group consisting of from 0.1
to 1 wt% SiO.sub.2, 0.1 to 1 wt% CaO, from 0.1 to 1 wt% Al.sub.2
O.sub.3 and from 0.05 to 1 wt% of a sulfate from the group
consisting of SrSO.sub.4, BaSO.sub.4, CaSO.sub.4 and Na.sub.2
SO.sub.4.
8. The flexible magnet of claim 5 wherein the ferrite contains from
0.1 to 0.5 wt% SiO.sub.2.
9. The flexible magnet of claim 5 wherein the ferrite contains from
0.1 to 1 wt% Al.sub.2 O.sub.3.
10. The flexible magnet of claim 8 wherein the ferrite contains
from 0.1 to 1 wt% Al.sub.2 O.sub.3.
11. The flexible magnet of claim 7 wherein the ferrite particles
have an average particle size of about 5 .mu.m.
12. The magnet of claim 7, wherein said elastomeric binder contains
a mixture of chlorosulfonated polyethylene and polyisobutylene.
Description
During the last ten years, a new type of permanent magnet has found
widespread use. It is a flexible magnet made by mixing
substantially domain-size particles of a hexaferrite with a
flexible binder and by molding the mixture, usually by extrusion.
Hexaferrites are permanent magnets that can be described by the
formula M O .sup.. 6 Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 wherein M stands for at least
one element out of the group Ba, Sr, Pb, and Ca, the Ca - content
being usually limited to 2 wt% of the ferrite. Other names for
these hexaferrites are ceramic magnets, ferrite permanent
magnets,hard ferrites, magnetoplumbites, etc. The hexaferrite for
flexible magnets has generally been a lead-modified barium ferrite
in most applications. The flexible binder has usually been either a
natural rubber or a mixture of chlorosulfonated polyethylene and
polyisobutylene. The properties of these magnets and methods for
their manufacture have been carefully investigated and are
disclosed in numerous patents and publications. The principal
application for these magnets has been the so-called magnetic
gasket which is used today, for example, for sealing and closing
most refrigerator doors.
The usual procedure for making such flexible magnets has been the
following: 18 wt% barium carbonate BaCO.sub.3, 2 wt%
leadmonosilicate Pb0 .sup.. SiO.sub.2 are mixed with 80 wt%
chemically prepared ferric oxide Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3. (The term
chemically prepared ferric oxide is used here in contrast to the
terms natural ferric oxide or iron ore, the chemically prepared
ferric oxides being far more expensive than the natural ones. The
ferric oxide generally used in the manufacture of the prior-art
flexible magnets is an oxide produced by the calcination of ferrous
sulfate FeSO.sub.4 .sup.. H.sub.2 O). The mixture of Fe.sub.2
O.sub.3, BaCO.sub.3 and PbO .sup.. SiO.sub.2 is heated in air to
approximately 2150 .degree.F, usually in a rotary furnace. The
barium carbonate decomposes into barium oxide BaO which then reacts
with the ferric oxide Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 to form the hexaferrite
crystals of the type BaO .sup.. 6 Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3. The
lead-monosilicate PbO.sup.. SiO.sub.2 is added to promote the
formation of plate-shape barium ferrite particles and to insulate
the ferrite crystals from each other so that the intrinsic coercive
force stays high. The expensive, chemically prepared ferric oxide
is used because it was found with the prior-art procedures that
flexible magnets made by using natural ferric oxides did not
exhibit the desired magnetic properties. The reacted ferrite is
cooled to room temperature and is milled with steel balls until
essentially all ferrite particles are of single-domain size. The
critical size, below which a single-domain particles has a lower
energy than a multi-domain particle, is approximately 1.0 .mu.m for
the hexaferrites as is described in the prior art. Such small-size
particles have the characteristics of a dust. During the milling
into single-domain size, the lattices of the ferrite crystals
become distorted which results in a substantial loss in magnetic
properties. Therefore, the single-domain size powder is usually
annealed at a temperature of approximately 1700.degree.F to heal
out the lattice defects and to restore the magnetic properties.
Approximately 91 wt% of the annealed ferrite powder is mixed with 9
wt% elastomeric binder, usually between a pair of rolls heated to
200.degree.F. The flexible sheets of mixed ferrite and binder are
taken off the rolls and are then further processed, usually in a
short screw extruder that extrudes the ferrite-binder mix at a
temperature of approximately 220.degree.F into flexible magnet
strips of various sizes, one typical size being 0.350 inches wide
and 0.150 inches thick. The magnet strip is magnetized usually with
two poles on only one side of the strip.
One problem with these prior-art, extruded, flexible magnets is
their low maximum energy product (BH).sub.max which has been less
than 0.7 MGOe in most applications -- far lower than that of the
other permanent magnets in use today. Another problem has been the
lead content in the prior-art flexible magnets. The lead was found
necessary in order to obtain the optimum magnetic properties. When
no lead additions were tried, it was found that the (BH).sub.max of
the flexible magnet strip was greatly reduced. Because of the toxic
nature of the lead-containing material, great precautions had to be
taken in the prior-art procedure, particularily during the heating
steps, during which toxic, lead-containg vapors are generated.
Also, great precautions had to be taken so that the lead-containing
single-domain-size dust would not be inhaled by the workers during
the mixing operation with the elastomeric binder. Furthermore, the
lead-containing flexible magnets could generally not be used in
applications, such as certain toys, where there is a chance that
small children may eat them.
Another problem with the prior-art flexible magnets has been the
high raw material cost because the basic raw material has been the
expensive, chemically prepared ferric oxide. Because of this, the
prior-art flexible magnets have been relatively expensive. Another
problem with the prior-art flexible magnets is that they break
relatively easily when bent because their mechanical properties are
poor compared to those of the binder without ferrite. This is
related to the use of the single-domain-size dust, such dust not
only being difficult to handle and difficult to mix with the
flexible binder, but also causing the mechanical properties to
deteriorate at the high volume percentages of ferrite that are
needed for obtaining optimum magnetic properties. Of course, it was
known that a larger ferrite particle size would be highly desirable
because this would allow higher volume percentages of ferrite,
improve the mechanical properties, and simplify the processing.
However, all previous attempts of obtaining suitable flexible
magnets with larger ferrite particles have failed. With the
prior-art procedure it was found necessary to use the
single-domain-size dust in order to prepare flexible magnets with
optimum magnetic properties.
A still further problem with the prior-art procedure is the
requirement of annealing the single-domain-size dust after the
milling operation. This processing step has been difficult to carry
out because of the problems involved in moving a small-particle
dust through a high-temperature furnace. The rotary tube furnaces
used for obtaining the inital ferrite reaction can not be used
bacause the single-domain-size dust is not free-flowing and stickes
to the walls of the furnace tube. Obviously, a combustion gas can
not be used directly to heat the single-domain-size dust because
such gases would blow the dust out through the furnace stack. For
these reasons, elaborate furnaces had to be used, and the annealing
operation has been a very costly processing step.
It is the primary object of this invention to provide a flexible,
extruded ferrite permanent magnet strip having greatly improved
magnetic properties.
It is another object of this invention to provide a flexible
ferrite permanent magnet that is safe to use and contains no lead
or any other toxic ingredient.
A still further object of this invention is to provide lower-cost,
flexible magnets by using iron ore as the basic raw material in
place of the chemically prepared ferric oxide.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a flexible
ferrite permanent magnet with greatly improved mechanical
properties.
Another object of this invention is to provide a process of making
flexible ferrite permanent magnets in which no powder dust has to
be heat-treated, in particular a process in which the expensive
annealing step is eliminated.
Other objects of the invention will, in part, be obvious and will,
in part, appear hereinafter. For a better understanding of the
nature and objects of this invention, reference should be had to
the following detailed description and drawings, in which:
FIGS. 1 and 1a provide is a schematic comparison of a multi-domain
particle having single crystal characteristic with a single-domain
particle.
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram, partially in cross section, of
portions of a pressing and orienting apparatus arranged for making
multi-domain particles having single crystal characteristic.
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram, partially in cross section, of
portions of an extrusion apparatus for making one type of magnet of
this invention.
FIG. 4 is a schematic drawing of a magnet of the invention.
FIGS. 5 and 5a illustrate alternative distribution of the lines of
flux in the magnet of FIG. 4.
FIG. 6 is a plot of the maximum enenrgy product against the ferrite
particle size for the extruded, flexible magnets of this
invention.
FIG. 7 is a plot of the maximum energy product against the
SiO.sub.2 -content of the ferrite component of the extruded,
flexible magnets of this invention.
FIG. 8 is a plot of the maximum energy product against the mole
ratio Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 /BaO for the extruded, flexible magnets of
this invention.
FIG. 9 is a comparison of the intrinsic demagnetization curves of
various flexible magnets of this invention with the curve for the
prior-art magnet.
Referring to FIG. 1 and FIG. 1a, there is shown a schematic
comparison of a multi-domain ferrite permanent magnet particle 1
having single-crystal characteristics with a single-domain particle
2. The term "domain" is used here, as it generally is, to describe
the volume portions of the material in which the ferromagnetic
alignment is in one direction. Particle 1 is made up of many
domains 3, the alignment in each domain indicated by an arrow 4
pointing up or pointing down whereas the particle 2 is made up of
only one domain. (Prior to magnetization, the net moment of
magnetization is essentially zero in particle 1 because there are
an equal number of domains aligned up and down which tends to
cancel out the magnetization). The term "single crystal" is used
here, as it usually is, to describe a crystal structure where all
crystal planes are parallel to the corresponding planes through the
elementary lattice cell and where all atoms are arranged in the
same ordered structure throughout the material. Of course, it is
understood that the actual shapes of particles 1 and 2 may be
different than the ones schematically shown in FIG. 1 and FIG. 1a.
Also, the actual shapes and numbers of the domains 3 may be
different than the ones shown schematically for particle 1 in FIG.
1. Particle 1 has essentially single crystal characteristics
because all arrows are essentially parallel. The present invention
is primarily directed toward barium ferrite and strontium ferrite
flexible permanent magnets, and - as is known from numerous
publications -- such ferrite materials are hexagonal and are
strongly anisotropic having a preferred direction perpendicular to
the basal plane. For barium ferrite and for strontium ferrite all
arrows would be perpendicular to the basal, hexagonal lattice and
would point in the so-called easy direction. The prior-art flexible
ferrite permanent magnets are made from single-domain-size
particles, such as particle 2 in FIG. 1a, and it was generally
believed that such particles are needed for obtaining flexible
ferrite permanent magnets with optimum properties. Surprisingly, we
have discovered that greatly improved flexible ferrite permanent
magnets can be made by using multi-domain particles having
single-crystal characteristics, such as particle 1 in FIG. 1.
Whereas the single-domain particles of critical size have a length
of approximately 1.0 .mu.m, the multi-domain particles having
single crystal characteristics preferably have a length of
approximately 5 .mu.m. Thus the volume of the multi-domain
particles having single crystal characteristics is considerably
larger than that of the single-domain particles.
The magnets of the invention and the processes for their
manufacture will be described with particular reference to FIGS. 2
through 5a. Multi-domain ferrite permanent magnet particles having
predominantly single crystal characteristics can be prepared in
several ways. One of them consists of preparing first the
single-domain-size particles in essentially the same way as has
been practiced in the prior art -- except, preferably, with no lead
addition and by using natural iron ore as the basic raw material.
Beneficiated or unbenficiated iron ore powder is mixed with barium
carbonate or strontium carbonate, and the mixture is heated to a
temperature higher than 2000.degree.F to form the hexaferrite. The
ferrite clinkers are broken up and milled until the ferrite
particles are essentially of single-domain size. The single-domain
particles are suspended in a liquid to form a slurry as is common
practice in the manufacture of the anisotropic hexaferrites, and
several methods can be used of preparing highly oriented, dense,
ferrite agglomerates from the ferrite flurry. One method is the one
described schematically in FIG. 2 which is essentially FIG. 1 of
U.S. Pat. No. 3,412,461. In this method, which is widely practiced
today in the manufacture of the fully sintered hexaferrites, a
highly anisotropic green ferrite magnet body having the proper
density is obtained with relatively small amounts of mechanical and
electric power. An upper press member 4 and lower press member 5
are shown which, with the die wall 6, define a cavity 7 for
containing a ferrite slurry. Two coils 8 and 8' are shown in part
in cross section. These coils have the function of establishing the
orienting magnetic field, the lines of force of which are shown
schematically in the cavity at 9. It will be noted that the lines
of force are straight in the inner portions of the die cavity and
are curved only at the edges of the cavity as at 10. Accordingly,
the single-domain-size ferrite particles are all oriented strongly
and uniformly in parallelism at all portions of the body except
near the edges. In operation, the punch member 5 is raised to
operative position and the punch member 4 is lowered into the die
member 6 to form the cavity 7 into which a ferrite slurry is pumped
through means not shown. Simultaneously with the pressing action,
coils 8 and 8' are energized producing the magnetic field indicated
at 9 and 10 which operates to orient the ferrite particles.
Following the orientation operation, the punch member 4 is raised
and the die member 6 is lowered exposing the green ferrite
plate.
The green ferrite plates are broken up, and the ferrite pieces are
sintered in one of several ways, the most economical one being in a
directly gas-fired rotary kiln that is lined with a refractory
brick. Because of the high density and relatively large size of the
ferrite pieces, very high production rates are obtainable with only
a small rotary kiln. The sintered ferrite pieces are crushed into a
suitable size, such as to an average size of approximately 5 .mu.m.
Ferrite particles processed in this manner are multi-domain and are
almost perfect single crystals. Of course, there are other methods
for the preparation of such multi-domain ferrite particles having
predominantly single-crystal characteristics.
The ferrite particles are mixed with an elastomeric binder in a
conventional mixer, such as between rolls or in a Banburry mixer.
The mixture of ferrite and binder can then be brought into suitable
shape for feeding into the hopper of a screw extruder, for example,
by pelletizing in a chopper.
Referring now to FIG. 3, there is seen the cross section of a
portion of a screw extruder 11 with the usual heating coils 12 and
13 which provide the heat for keeping the mixture 14 at a
temperature of 200.degree.F or higher. A flexible magnet strip 15
is extruded through the nozzle 16 through the action of the screw
17.
Referring to FIG. 4, the flexible magnet strip 18 can be magnetized
with one pair of poles on side 19 only, Of course, it is understood
that, when the multi-domain particles having predominantly single
crystal characteristics are magnetized, the domain structure
changes compared to the domain structure shown for particle 1 in
FIG. 1.
Referring to FIG. 5 and FIG. 5a, there are seen two basic types of
flux distribution in a cross section of the magnet strip. The lines
of flux 20 are curved and go from the one pole to the other whereas
the lines of flux 21 are straight with no flux in the small
nonmagnetized portion 22. When the latter flux distribution is
used, it is desirable to fasten a steel back-up strip 23 to the
back of the magnet strip providing a return path for the flux.
Although this greatly reduces the flexibility of the magnet
arrangement, such a method can be used at an advantage because the
holding force is increased, particularly if there is a preferred
orientation of the ferrite particles, with the basal plane parallel
to the two main surfaces of the strip. Of course, other flux
distributions and pole configurations can be used. The extruded
magnet strip with or without steel back-up strip can be inserted in
a balloon gasket composed of, for example, polyvinylchloride. Such
a gasket can be used to close and seal doors, such as refrigerator
or storm doors.
Flexible magnets made in accordance with the described process have
not only greatly improved magnetic and mechanical properties, but
are also lower in cost than the prior-art flexible magnets when
natural iron ore is used as the basic raw material. They are safer
to use because they can be made without lead. We believe that the
surprising improvement in the magnetic and mechanical properties of
the flexible magnets is due to a combination of several effects.
The mechanical properties are improved because there is less
ferrite surface in contact with the elastomeric binder. Also, the
shape of the large particles having single crystal characteristics
is better suited for the elastomeric binder systems than that of
other ferrite particles. The magnetic properties are improved for
several reasons. There are fewer, nonmagnetic gaps in the flexible
magnets through which the magnetic flux must pass. Because of the
fewer non-magnetic gaps, the hysteresis loop is less sheared, and
the remanence B.sub.r and the maximum energy product (BH).sub.max
are increased. The large particles having predominantly single
crystal characteristics have a considerably higher physical density
than other types of ferrite particles at the same level of
intrinsic coercive force H.sub.ci, particularily when natural iron
ore is used as the basic raw material for the flexible magnets.
Because of the high physical density of the particles, the
remanence B.sub.r and the maximum energy product (BH).sub.max are
further increased. The shape of the large particles having single
crystal characteristics is also particularily suited for the proper
magnetic stacking in the elastomeric binder system, particularly
when an anisotropic or partially aniotropic flexible magnet is
desired. Of course, it is readily understood that the flexible
ferrite permanent magnets of this invention can be made anisotropic
with considerably less effort than the prior-art flexible magnets
because the friction forces on the interfaces between ferrite and
binder, which restrict the alignment of the crystals, are far
smaller for large than for small ferrite particles.
Although we have found that excellent properties can be obtained
without lead additions, we have found also that some additions to
the binary ferrite system are highly desirable, the preferred
addition being the silicon oxide SiO.sub.2. In the preferred
embodiment of this invention, the ferrite componet of the flexible
magnet should contain between 0.1 and 0.5 wt% SiO.sub.2. Such an
addition is safe to use, among others, because SiO.sub.2 has a far
lower vapor pressure than PbO at high tempertures. The magnetic
stacking in the elastomeric binder system is improved when the
described SiO.sub.2 -- addition is used in the flexible magnet of
this invention. This increases the remanence B.sub.r and the
maximum energy product (BH).sub.max. Other beneficial additives
that can be used in place of the lead compound - with and without
SiO.sub.2 -- are the sulfates SrSO.sub.4, BaBO.sub.3, CaSO.sub.4,
and Na.sub.2 SO.sub.4 and other refractory oxides, particularily
CaO and Al.sub.2 O.sub.3. The preferred ranges for these additives
are the following: 0.05 to 1.0 wt% SO.sub.4 ; 0.1 to 1.0 wt% CaO;
0.1 to 1.0 wt% Al.sub.2 O.sub.3. A combination of SiO.sub.2 and
Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 is particularily beneficial. Surprisingly, the
expensive annealing step is not needed. Evidently, during the
milling of the multi-domain particles having single crystal
characteristics very few crystal imperfections are introduced. As a
result, the remanence B.sub.r and the intrinsic coercive force
H.sub.ci do not deteriorate noticeably during the milling, in
contrast to the conditions of the procedures of the prior art.
We have further found that, when optimum magnetic properties are
desired, the mole ratio between the ferric oxide Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3
and the earth alkaline oxide BaO or SrO should be between 4.5 and
5.5, with the best properties obtained at a mole ratio of 5.2 or
5.3. This is surprising because the optimum mole ratio for
obtaining the highest possible saturation moment for barium ferrite
or strontium ferrite is approximately 5.9 and the optimum mole
ratio for obtaining the highest maximum energy product (BH).sub.max
on the sintered hexaferrites is 5.6 or 5.7. Evidently, a lower mole
ratio than is normally used for these ferrites gives a better
combination of properties for making the flexible magnets of this
invention. It apperas that a more plate-like particle shape is
formed at a mole ratio of 5.2 or 5.3 than at the higher ratios
normally used for these ferrites and that the improved particle
shape enhances the ferrite distribution in the elastomeric binder
system.
As has already been mentioned, iron ore is the preferred basic raw
material for the flexible magnets of this invention. By "basic" is
meant here that at least 50 wt% of the flexible magnet can be
derived from iron ore -- and preferably more. When barium ferrite
flexible magnets are made, the content of the flexible magnet
derived from the natural iron oxide can be approximately 76 wt%.
This amount is calculated as follows: The preferred starting mix
for the ferrite reaction consists of essentially 19 wt% BaCO.sub.3,
80 wt% natural iron oxide Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 and 1 wt% additions,
mostly SiO.sub.2, sulfates, CaO and/or Al.sub.2 O.sub.3. 4.3 wt% of
this mix is lost during calcining, mostly in the form of CO.sub.2
which goes out through the furnaces stack. This increases the
Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 -- content in the barium ferrite clinker to 83.2
wt%. During further processing there is a small further increase in
the Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 -- content of the barium ferrite because there
is some wear of the steel balls during the ball milling, the wear
of the steel balls being oxidized to essentially Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3
during the process. There is also a slight loss in BaO during the
pressing of the ferrite slurry, the BaO being lost through the
filters. For these reasons, the final preferred Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 --
content in the ferrite component is approximately 83.5 wt%. To make
the flexible magnet, the preferred starting mix is 91 wt% ferrite
and 9 wt% elastomeric binder. This means that approximately 76 wt%
of the flexible barium ferrite magnet consists of Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3.
Obviously, when strontium ferrite flexible magnets are made, the
weight percentage of Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 in the flexible magnet is
still higher because SrO is lighter than BaO, the preferred mole
ratio being essentially the same for both ferrites, namely 5.2 to
5.3, as was pointed out above. A similar calculation shows that the
Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 -- content in the flexible strontium ferrite
magnet is between 80 and 81 wt%.
These calculations show that, despite the relatively low mole
ratios in the ferrites, the basic raw material for the flexible
magnets can be iron ore if iron ore is used as the source for the
ferric oxide. It is not yet clearly understood why the flexible
magnets of this inventions have such particularily outstanding
properties when iron ore is used as the basic raw material. It
appears that a silica-containing phase forms a film along the grain
boundaries of the iron ore particles and that this film is being
carried over into the barium ferrite or strontium ferrite. The
effect of this film apparently is that particularily beneficial
ferrite particle shapes are formed during the sintering and milling
which in combination with the elastomeric binder system give
flexible magnets with particularily useful properties.
There are several methods available for determining whether a
hexaferrite particle is a single crystal or a polycrystal or
whether it is a single-domain size or of multi-domain size. Direct
optical measurements are difficult to carry out because of the
tendency of the ferrite particles to cling together due to the
magnetic attraction. Indirect methods are generally far easier to
use. One method for determining the amount of single crystals in a
ferrite powder aggregate is to try to align and fix the ferrite
particles in a strong magnetic field and then measure the magnetic
properties parallel and perpendicular to the direction of intended
alignment. If the powder aggregate consists of perfect
polycrystals, the properties are essentially the same in both
directions. If the powder aggregate consists of perfect single
crystals, the properties are very different in both directions due
to the high crystalline anisotropy. By comparing the results of
such measurements, the degree of single crystal characteristics can
be determined quickly. The term "having predominantly single
crystal characteristics," as defined here, is based on the results
of such measurements, meaning that at least 50 percent of the
ferrite particles behave like single crystals in this type of
test.
Whether a particle is of single-domain size or of multi-domain size
is determined by calculating the critical domain size and by
measuring the size of the particle in question. The size of the
particles can most easily be determined by indirect methods, the
method used here being the Fisher Subsieve Sizer. In this method
air is pumped through a powder sample. The average particle size is
found from the air flow resistance of the sample. If the Fisher
size is 1.0 .mu.m (1 micron) or less, the powder is of
single-domain size for the purpose of this disclosure. For a
preferred type of magnet of this invention, the Fisher size is 5
.mu.m. Such particles have more than one hundred times the volume
of a single-domain size particle. However, a significant
improvement in the properties of the flexible magnets of this
invention is already found when the Fisher size is 2 .mu.m which
means an average ferrite particle volume approximately ten times
the volume of a single-domain particle. Of course, when the ferrite
particles are much larger, as is desired for certain magnets of
this invention, a conventional wire screen can be used to determine
the average ferrite particle size. From the volume fraction of the
ferrite powder aggregate retained on , for example, a 400-mesh
screen and from the method used in preparing the ferrite powder,
the average ferrite particle size can often be estimated quite
accurately. For example, we have found that the Fisher subsieve
size is approximately 6 .mu.m when 2 percent of the ferrite powder
is retained on a 400-mesh screen and when we use 1 inches diameter
steel balls in a conventional dry ball mill to pulverize
single-crystalline barium ferrites. In order that the invention may
be more clearly understood, a number of examples of the practice of
the invention are now offered. As has already been pointed out,
only one type of ferric oxide has been found suitable for the basic
raw material of the prior-art flexible ferrite permanent magnets
although many other types of iron oxide are available. This ferric
oxide, which is the one used in the Examples 1 through 23, is
produced by the calcination of ferrous sulfate. For a better
understanding of the significance of some aspects of the present
invention, a description will first be given for the preparation of
this type of ferric oxide: Metallic iron is dissolved in sulfuric
acid, and the liquid obtained in this manner is heated in a vacuum
to precipitate out crystals of FeSO.sub.4 .sup.. 7 H.sub.2 O. The
mixture of liquid and crystals is filtered, and the filter cake is
heated to 300.degree.F to form FeSO.sub.4 .sup.. H.sub.2 O. The
dried and partially dewatered filter cake is pulverized and
screened. A certain particle size fraction of the dried cake is
heated in a special acid-proof, high-temperature furnace at
1800.degree.F. The H.sub.2 SO.sub.4 formed thereby is seperated
from the solids which consist of essentially 90 wt% Fe.sub.2
O.sub.3 and 10 wt% undecomposed FeSO.sub.4. The solid mixture is
ball-milled in water to reduce the particle size. The slurry is
washed several times to remove most of the FeSO.sub.4. The clean
slurry is filtered, and the filter cake is dried at 300.degree.F to
remove the water. Finally, the dried cake is pulverized to form the
powder used for making today's ferrite permanent magnets.
Example 1A
An extruded, flexible ferrite magnet strip was made as follows: 800
g of ferric oxide Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 produced by the calcination of
ferrous sulfate were mixed in a steel ball mill in water for 4 hrs
with 180 g barium carbonate BaCO.sub.3 and 20 g leadmonosilicate
PbO .sup.. SiO.sub.2. The slurry was dried, and the dried cake was
calcined at 2150.degree.F for 15 min. The calcined clinkers were
pulverized, and the powder was milled in a steel ball mill in water
for 16 hrs, after which the ferrite particles were found to be
essentially of single-domain size. The ferrite slurry was pressed
in a magnetic field of approximately 10 kOe at an end pressure of
3000 psi using the arrangement schematically shown in FIG. 2. The
pressed green plates were broken up and sintered for 15 min at
2250.degree.F. The sintered pieces had an average degree of
anisotropy (1 - B.sub.r / B.sub.r)= 0.81 where B.sub.r and B.sub.r
are the remanences perpendicular to the direction of magnetic
alignment. This indicates that they were predominantly single
crystals. They were pulverized dry in a steel ball mill with steel
balls into a multi-domain powder having predominantly single
crystal characteristics, the average particle size being 4.6 Fisher
microns. 1.9 g chlorosulfonated polyethylene (HYPALON 45) and 2.7 g
polyisobutylene (VISTANEX L-140) were mixed at 200.degree.F on a
standard two-roll rubber mill until the mixture was in sheet form
whereupon 273 g of the ferrite powder was added and worked in. The
spacing between the two rolls was 1/16 inches. Total milling time
was about 10 minutes. The mixture was sheeted off the mill and
granulated. The granules were fed into a conventional rubber
extruder heated to 240.degree.F, with the die heated to
220.degree.F. A rectangular, flexible magnet strip was extruded
having a width of 0.300 inches and a thickness of 0.150 inches. The
strip was tested magnetically and mechanically. The test results
are summarized in Table I.
Example 1B
An extruded, flexible magnet strip was made exactly as in Example
1A, except that the prior-art process was used. The ferrite slurry
was dried after the 16-hr-ball-milling, and the dried powder was
annealed for 2 hrs at 1700.degree.F, after which the powder was
added to the HYPALON-VISTANEX binder exactly as in Example 1A, and
an extruded, flexible magnet strip was made as in Example 1A. The
average ferrite particle size was 0.9 Fisher microns. The
properties of the extruded strip are described in Table I. A
comparison between the test results of Example 1A and 1B shows that
the flexible magnet of the invention has greatly improved magnetic
and mechanical properties over the prior-art flexible magnet.
Contrary to the teachings of the prior art, the strip with the
large, single-crystalline-type particles is magnetically far
superior to the prior-art magnets with the small,
single-domain-size particles. Also, the expensive powder annealing
step, which has caused so many problems in the past, is no longer
needed because the powder of Example 1A was not annealed whereas
the powder of Example 1B was annealed.
Example 2 through 8
Extruded, flexible magnet strip was prepared exactly as in Example
1A, except that the particle size and the weight percentages of the
ferrite component of the strip was varied. The test results are
summarized in Table I. The maximum energy product (BH).sub.max of
the strip is plotted in FIG. 6 against the Fisher particle size.
Two curves are seen, one for 91 wt% and one for 94 wt% ferrite. It
is seen that the strip of Example 2 having a particle size of 2.1
Fisher microns is significantly improved over the prior-art strip
-- Example 1B. The ferrite particles in the strip of Example 2 have
a volume at least ten times the volume of the single-domain size
particles. The particle size in Example 3 is 1.0 Fisher microns
which means essentially single-domain size. (BH).sub.max has
dropped to 0.8 MGOe which is still higher than the value for the
Example 1B strip. This means that an improved strip -- and without
the expensive annealing step -- can be made by using the process of
this invention along with the teachings of the prior art of using
single-domain size particles. However, as the data clearly show, a
ferrite particle volume of at least ten times, and preferably of
the order of one hundred times the volume of the single-domain
particle is to be preferred. If the particle is too large (Examples
4 and 5), the mechanical properties are improved, but (BH).sub.max
is decreased as FIG. 6 shows. When the percentage of ferrite in the
strip is increased to 94 wt%, still higher (BH).sub.max values are
obtained (Example 7) at the expense of the mechanical properties.
As is seen from FIG. 6, the 94-wt%-curve peaks at a particle size
of 6.6 Fisher microns (Example 7). (BH).sub.max is decreased at
lower particle size (Example 6) and at larger particle size
(Example 8). The mechanical properties of the extruded strip always
improve with increasing ferrite particle size and with decreasing
weight percentages of ferrite.
Example 9 through 15
The ferrite component of the extruded, flexible magnet strips of
Example 1 through 8 contained approximately 1.6 wt% Pb. As has been
mentioned, such a large amount of lead is undesirable for several
reasons. Non-toxic additives were tried out in an effort to find a
substitute for the lead compound. Flexible magnet strips were
prepared exactly as in Example 1A, except that no leadmonosilicate
was used and that the starting mix was slightly changed. The weight
ratio Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 /BaCO.sub.3 was kept at 4.26 in order to
keep the mole ratio Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 /BaCO.sub.3 in the extruded
strip constant at 5.2 to 5.3. Additions of the SiO.sub.2 were used
at the following levels: 0; 0.1; 0.2; 0.3; 0.4; 0.5; 0.6 wt%. The
SiO.sub.2 was added at the start of the first ball-milling in the
form of finely pulverized quartz (5-MICRON Min-U-Sil). Table I
gives the ferrite starting compositions and the test results on the
extruded strip. The maximum energy product (BH).sub.max is plotted
in FIG. 7 against the SiO.sub.2 -- addition. As is seen the curve
peaks at 1.02 MGOe at 0.20 wt% SiO.sub.2 -- the same value of
(BH).sub.max that was obtained in Example 1A with an addition of
2.0 wt% PbO .sup.. SiO.sub.2. Surprisingly, excellent magnetic
properties can be obtained without lead with 0.20 wt% SiO.sub.2 and
at a mole ratio Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 /BaO of 5.2 to 5.3. As is seen
from the data, a significant improvement in the properties of the
flexible magnet strip is obtained when the SiO.sub.2 -- content
lies in the range 0.1 wt% (Example 10) to 0.5 wt% (Example 14). At
0.6 wr% SiO.sub.2 (Example 15) the (BH).sub.max -- value has
dropped to almost the level obtained with no addition (Example
9).
Examples 16 through 22
Extruded, flexible magnet strip was prepared exactly as in Example
11, except that the mole ratio Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 /BaO in the strip
was varied by varying the weight ratio Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 /BaCO.sub.3
in the ferrite starting mix. Table I gives the ferrite starting
compositions and summarizes the test results. The mole ratio of the
ferrite starting composition was chosen 0.05 points lower in order
to account for the steel pick-up and BaO-loss during processing. As
is seen from FIG. 8, the highest (BH).sub.max -- value is obtained
at mole ratios of 4.5 (Example 21), 4.75 (Example 20), 5.0 (Example
19), and 5.5 (Example 18). When the mole ratio is further increased
or decreased, (BH).sub.max drops sharply. Thus, the data show that
the preferred mole ratio for the flexible magnets of this invention
is 4.5 to 5.5 when 0.2 wt% SiO.sub.2 are used as the only
additive.
Example 23
Magnets were prepared exactly as in Example 13, except that 0.2 wt%
SiO.sub.2 and 0.2 wt% Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 were added in place of 0.4
wt% SiO.sub.2. Table I summarizes the results of the tests. As is
seen, the combination of SiO.sub.2 and Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 is
particularly beneficial in obtaining outstanding properties. A
(BH).sub.max -- value of 1.04 MGOe could be obtained without lead
and at a ferrite percentage of only 91 wt%.
Example 24
An iron ore known as "Itabira Blue Dust" was used as the basic raw
material. It is one of the purest hematite ores available, and it
is mined in the Vale do Rio Doce in Brazil. Its impurity was 0.38
wr% SiO.sub.2 and 0.37 wt% Al.sub.2 O.sub.3. It costs ten times
less than the expensive, chemically prepared ferric oxide. 810 g of
the "Blue Dust" and 190 g of barium carbonate BaCO.sub.3 were
milled in a ball mill in water for 8 hrs. The further processing
into an extruded, flexible ferrite magnet strip was carried out
exactly as in Example 1A. The average particle size in the strip
was 4.8 Fisher microns. The ferrite component of the flexible strip
contained 0.26 wt% SiO.sub.2 and 0.22 Al.sub.2 O.sub.3. The
extruded magnet strip had a remanence B.sub.r = 2350 Gauss, an
intrinsic coercive force H.sub.ci = 2700 Oe, a maximum energy
product (BH).sub.max = 1.15 MGOe and a tensile strength of 1450
psi. These properties are considerably better than those of any of
the strips of the above examples.
Example 25
Extruded flexible magnet strip was prepared exactly as in Example
24, except that "Lac Jeannine Superconcentrate" iron ore was used
in place of "Blue Dust." The Lac Jeannine ore is a specular
hematite that is mined in Canada and contains quartz as a major
impurity. Most of the quartz can be removed easily. The resulting
beneficiated ore is the superconcentrate which had 0.21 wt%
SiO.sub.2 and 0.39 wr% Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 as the only significant
impurities. The ferrite component of the extruded flexible strip
contained 0.15 wt% SiO.sub.2 and 0.27 wt% Al.sub.2 O.sub.3. The
ferrite particle size in the strip was 4.7 Fisher microns. The
strip had a remanence B.sub.r = 2330 Gauss, an intrinsic coercive
force H.sub.ci = 2650 Oersted, a maximum energy product
(BH).sub.max = 1.13 MGOe, and a tensile strength of 1400 psi. The
data show that extruded, flexible magnet strip with excellent
properties can be prepared with the Canadian ore with essentially
the same properties obtained with the Brazilian ore. Such strip is
superior to any of the strip that could be prepared using the
expensive, chemically prepared ferric oxide as the basic raw
material.
Example 26
Multi-domain strontium ferrite particles having single crystal
characteristics were prepared by the so-called
iron-ore-celestite-soda-ash process. 2500 g Itabira Blue Dust were
ball-milled in 2100 cc water with 560 g Mexican celestite and 450 g
soda ash for 8 hrs. The resulting slurry was washed until the
Na.sub.2 SO.sub.4 -- content was reduced to 0.5 wt% of the solids.
The slurry was dried. The further processing was carried out
exactly as in Example 1A. The Mexican celestite that was used had
the following composition in wt%: 95.1 SrSO.sub.4 -- 2.5 CaSO.sub.4
- 0.5 BaSO.sub.4 -- 1.2 CaCO.sub.3 -- 0.15 SiO.sub.2 -- 0.12
Al.sub.2 O.sub.3. The soda ash was 98 percent Na.sub.2 CO.sub.3.
The ferrite component of the extruded, flexible magnet strip
contained 0.22 wt% SiO.sub.2, 0.28 wt% Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, 0.3 wt%
Na.sub.2 SO.sub.3, and 0.2 wt% SrSO.sub.4. The ferrite particle
size in the strip was 4.8 Fisher microns. The mole ratio Fe.sub.2
O.sub.3 /SrO was 5.1 in the strip. The strip had a remanence
B.sub.r = 2340 Gauss, an intrinsic coercive force H.sub.ci = 3100
Oersted, a maximum energy product (BH).sub.max = 1.14 MGOe, and a
tensile strength of 1350 psi. These data show that very much
improved, extruded, flexible ferrite magnet strip can be prepared
from multi-domain strontium ferrite particles having predominantly
single crystal characteristics if ore is used as the basic raw
material. Higher coercive forces at essentially the same level of
(BH).sub.max can be obtained with the strontium ferrite flexible
strip.
In other experiments, the optimum particle size, SiO.sub.2
-content, mole ratio, etc. were determined for the strontium
ferrite extruded, flexible strip. Curves essentially the same as
those shown in FIGS. 6, 7, and 8 were obtained. The optimum ferrite
particle size is near 5 Fisher microns. The optimum SiO.sub.2
-content of the ferrite in the strip is near 0.2 wt%. The optimum
mole ratio Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 /SrO in the strip is near 5.2.
Example 27
Calendered and laminated, flexible barium ferrite magnets were made
as follows: Multi-domain barium ferrite powder having predominantly
single crystal characteristics was prepared exactly as in Example
24. A binder consisting of 4.9 g HYPALON 45 and 2.1 g VISTANEX
L-140 was mixed at 200.degree.F in a standard two-roll rubber mill
until the mixture was in sheet form. However, unlike the conditions
for Examples 1 through 26, the spacing between the two rolls was
only 15 mils. 93 g of barium ferrite powder was added and worked
in. Total milling time was about 15 min. The mixture was sheeted
off the mill. Twenty pieces were cut from the sheet and were
laminated to form one single test sample which had a remanence
B.sub.r = 2750 Gauss, an intrinsic coercive force H.sub.ci = 2400
Oe, and a maximum energy product (BH).sub.max = 1.65 MGOe. The
reason for this large increase in B.sub.r and (BH).sub.max over
that of the strip of Example 24 is the much higher degree of
ferrite crystal orientation in the flexible magnet due to the small
spacing between the two rolls. The flexible magnets of this example
are particularly suited when the flux distribution is that of 21 in
FIG. 5. The resulting holding force with a steel back-up strip is
approximately twice that of a strip made, for example, in
accordance with Example 24 and magnetized so that the flux
distribution is that of 20 in FIG. 5. Of course, it will be
appreciated that the strip of Example 24 can be extruded at a rate
of approximately 60 feet per min. whereas the rate of making the
strip of this example is small in comparison.
Example 28
Unlike the magnets of all of the above Examples, which were made
using ferric oxide Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 as a source for the iron oxide,
magnetite was used in the form of a "Missouri magnetite
super-concentrate" which had the following impurities: 0.3 wt% CaO,
0.2 wt% SiO.sub.2, 0.15 wt% Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, 0.1 wr% MgO.
Extruded, flexible magnet strip was prepared exactly as in Example
24, except that the Missouri magnetite superconcentrate was used in
place of the Itabira Blue Dust. The ferrite component of the
flexible strip contained 0.15 wt% SiO.sub.2, 0.23 wt% CaO and 0.10
wt% Al.sub.2 O.sub.3. The ferrite particle size in the strip was
4.9 Fisher microns. The strip had a remanence B.sub.r = 2340 Gauss,
an intrinsic coercive force H.sub.ci = 2600 Oe, and a maximum
energy product (BH).sub.max = 1.14 MGOe. These data show that
magnetite ore can be used in place of hematite.
The most important findings of Examples 1 through 27 are summarized
in FIG. 9 which shows demagnetization curves B--H versus H. The
curve for Example 1B is typical for an extruded strip of the
expensive and toxic prior-art process. The curve for Example 1A
shows that very much improved, extruded strip can be made in
accordance with this invention, but with the practice of Example 1A
the strip is still relatively expensive and toxic. The curves for
Examples 24 and 26, which are almost indentical, show that the
extruded strip can be further improved by using natural iron ore as
the basic raw material. As an additional benefit it is found that
such strip is inexpensive and non-toxic. The curve for Example 27
shows that other types of flexible magnets, in addition to the
extruded strips, can be made which may have certain advantages in
some applications.
Although only one type of binder system was used in the examples,
those skilled in the art of compounding elastomeric compositions or
the like will readily understand that a wide variety of compounding
agents, plasticizers, vulcanizing agents, and the like is available
to provide variations in workability, flexi-bility, and hardness of
the binder system to adapt to special purposes within the scope of
this invention.
As the examples and FIG. 9 show, it is possible to manufacture
magnets having exceptionaly good characteristics with the simple
procedure encompassed by the invention. The properties of the
magnets are very much improved over those of the prior-art magnets.
No toxic ingredients are needed. The magnets can be made at
considerably lower cost than the prior-art magnets. While we have
described our invention in connection with specific examples and
specific embodyments, other modifications thereof will be readily
apparant to those skilled in the art without departing from the
spirit and scope of this invention as defined in the appended
claims. ##SPC1##
* * * * *