U.S. patent number 3,764,137 [Application Number 05/261,547] was granted by the patent office on 1973-10-09 for combination stiff and flexible golf club shaft.
Invention is credited to Anthony J. Petro.
United States Patent |
3,764,137 |
Petro |
October 9, 1973 |
COMBINATION STIFF AND FLEXIBLE GOLF CLUB SHAFT
Abstract
A golf club haVing a shaft construction that inhibits rearward
flexing of the shaft at the top of the back swing and initial part
of the down swing while permitting forward flexing through the ball
on the down swing. A rearwardly facing side of a wall of the shaft
is formed of a plurality of sections that extend longitudinally
along the shaft and that have proximately located facing ends.
Inventors: |
Petro; Anthony J. (Dippel
Manor, PA) |
Family
ID: |
22993816 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/261,547 |
Filed: |
June 9, 1972 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
473/316 |
Current CPC
Class: |
A63B
53/00 (20130101); A63B 60/00 (20151001); A63B
60/0081 (20200801) |
Current International
Class: |
A63B
53/00 (20060101); A63b 053/12 () |
Field of
Search: |
;273/77R,8R,8B,81R,193R,194R,183R,162R |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Pinkham; Richard C.
Assistant Examiner: Apley; Richard J.
Claims
I claim:
1. In a golf club having a shaft extending between a head and a
grip, the head being adapted to hit a golf ball while moving
forwardly during a down swing that is imparted to the club while it
is being held by the grip after the club has been moved through a
back swing; said shaft comprising: a plurality of adjacent sections
located exclusively on a rearwardly facing side of said shaft and
extending longitudinally of said shaft, an end of each of said
sections facing an end of an adjoining section, said plurality of
sections constituting means on said shaft whereby said ends are
proximate to each other in an unflexed condition of said shaft,
forced against each other during a back swing and the initial part
of the down swing thereby inhibiting rearward flexing of said
shaft, and spaced apart from each other during the latter part of
the down swing thereby allowing forward flexing of said shaft.
2. The golf club of claim 1 wherein the shaft is tubular and
wherein the sections are on the rearwardly facing side of the back
portion of the shaft.
3. The golf club of claim 1 wherein the shaft is tubular and
wherein the sections are on the rearwardly facing side of the front
portion of the shaft.
4. The golf club of claim 1 wherein a plurality of rearwardly
facing slits intersecting the shaft periphery are formed in the
rearwardly facing side of the shaft to thus form said sections.
5. The golf club of claim 4 wherein the shaft is tubular and
wherein the back portion of the shaft, containing the slits, is
thicker than the front portion of the shaft.
6. The golf club of claim 4 wherein the shaft is tubular and
wherein the front portion of the shaft, containing the slits, is
thicker than the back portion of the shaft.
7. The golf club of claim 1 wherein said sections extend at least
180.degree. about the periphery of the shaft and are fastened to
the shaft periphery along the longitudinal centerline of the
shaft.
8. The golf club of claim 1 wherein said sections extend along the
lower part of the shaft.
9. The golf club of claim 1 wherein said sections are made of metal
and are bonded on said shaft.
10. The golf club of claim 1 wherein said sections are
progressively smaller as they extend downwardly of said shaft.
11. The golf club of claim 10 wherein said sections extend along
the lower part of the shaft.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
When a golfer makes his back swing he produces potential energy.
During the down swing this energy becomes kinetic-moving energy--
which is imparted to the ball. The more kinetic energy a golfer can
impart to the ball, the farther it will go. The kinetic energy is
equal to one-half of mass times velocity squared. In using a golf
club to drive a golf ball it is therefore desired to impart as much
velocity as is feasible to the club head.
Presently, golf club shafts are designed in different thicknesses
to thus vary the shaft stiffness. Golfers select shaft stiffness
depending on their strength or ability to swing the club head
forwardly against the ball against the resistance presented by the
shaft rigidity.
A relatively strong golfer will select a relatively stiff shaft due
to his having the strength in his hands to overcome the resistance
of the shaft to forward flexing as the club head engages the
ball.
A relatively weak golfer must necessarily use a more flexible shaft
so that the shaft will flex forwardly during the down swing to
increase the head velocity at the moment of impact of the head with
the ball. However, with a flexible shaft, there is also a rearward
flexing of the shaft at the end of the back swing and at the
beginning of the down swing. If a golfer swings too fast with a
flexible shaft, there is a large rearward head displacement at the
end of the back swing and at the beginning of the down swing so
that the club head will be rearwardly displaced by the bending of
the shaft during the initial part of the down swing if the speed of
the down swing is too great. Therefore, with a flexible shaft, a
golfer must swing slower than he is able to in order to minimize
rearward head displacement and allow the head to square itself on
impact with the ball. As a result, although it is easier to swing a
flexible shaft from a strength standpoint, the necessity of a
slower swing reduces the velocity of the club head at the moment of
impact of the head with the ball to thus reduce the distance the
hit ball will travel.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The object of this invention is to provide a golf club shaft
construction which will inhibit rearward displacement of the golf
club head by minimizing rearward shaft flexing and will,
nevertheless, permit easier forward head movement through the
impact zone to provide for the increased velocity of the head at
the moment of its impact with the ball. This object is accomplished
by providing a plurality of longitudinally aligned sections on a
rearwardly facing side of the shaft, the sections having adjoining
ends that are proximate to each other. The abutment of the sections
at the top of the back swing and initial part of the down swing
minimizes shaft flexing rearwardly. Through the impact zone, the
proximate section ends move away from each other to permit the
shaft to flex forwardly.
While the prior art, as illustrated by U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,078,728 and
2,220,852 show golf club shafts having sections with facing ends
extending longitudinally of the shaft, these sections are not so
located as to solely face rearwardly of the shaft for the purpose
of this invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is an elevation of the golf club;
FIG. 2 is a section of a part of the golf club shaft;
FIG. 3 is a view taken on the line 3--3 of FIG. 2;
FIG. 4 is a section taken on the line 4--4 of FIG. 3;
FIG. 5 is a section similar to FIG. 2, but showing the shaft while
it is flexing forwardly;
FIG. 6 is a section similar to FIG. 4, but showing the sections as
being mounted on the rearwardly facing side of the front portion of
a tubular shaft; and
FIGS. 7 through 9 are views of different species of the
invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
FIG. 1 shows a golf club 10 having a head 12 and a grip 14 that are
separated by a resilient shaft 16. The shaft 16, as is
conventional, is formed of a hollow tubular member. The front of
the shaft is considered to be that side of the shaft that faces
toward the golf ball when the golf club is suwng towards the ball
and the back of the shaft is considered to be that side of the
shaft that faces away from the golf ball when the golf club is
swung towards the golf ball.
Referring to FIGS. 2-4, the shaft 16 has a substantially uniform
wall thickness. A plurality of metal sections 18 extend
longitudinally along the shaft 16 on the rearwardly facing side of
the back portion of the shaft 16 and are secured thereto as, for
example, by being bonded thereto. In the unflexed condition of the
shaft 16, the facing ends of the sections 18 are parallel to each
other and are proximately located by either being spaced very close
to each other or by abutting each other.
When the shaft tends to bend backwards at the top of the back swing
and initial part of the down swing, the rearwardly facing or back
side of the shaft exterior periphery is under compression and the
adjoining edges of the sections 18 are forced against each other to
thus minimize rearward flexing of the shaft 16. However, when the
club head is entering the impact zone on the down swing, the
rearwardly facing or back side of the shaft goes into tension and
the shaft may flex more easily forward, as indicated in FIG. 5,
with the adjoining ends of the sections 18 separating from each
other.
Since the lower part of the shaft 16 has the maximum flexing during
the down swing, and since in certain circumstances, it would be
desirable not to add an undue amount of weight to the shaft, the
metal sections 18 preferably extend along the lower one-half to
one-third of the shaft as indicated in FIG. 1. For the same reason,
the sections 18 are preferably made smaller as they extend
downwardly of the shaft 16, as shown in FIG. 3.
In view of the foregoing, it can be seen that the shaft 16 with
attached sections 18 is rigid or stiff against rearward flexing so
that the head 12 will only deflect minimally rearwardly with
respect to a plane lengthwise through the grip 14 of the club at
the end of the back swing and the beginning of the down swing.
However, through the impact zone on the down swing, the head 12
will swing more readily forwardly relative to the plane through the
grip 14 to thus increase the velocity of the head at the moment of
impact with the ball and thereby impart increased energy to the
ball to thus increase the travel distance of the hit ball. Since
the head deflects less with respect to the plane through the grip
on rearward shaft flexing, the golfer will not have to deliberately
swing slower during the down swing to wait for the head to move
from its rearwardly deflected position relative to the grip of the
club.
Instead of mounting the sections 18 to the rearwardly facing
exterior of the back portion of the shaft 16, the same effect may
be accomplished as shown in FIG. 6 by mounting the sections 18 to
the rearwardly facing side of the front portion of the tubular
shaft 16 on the inner periphery of the shaft.
FIG. 7 shows a tubular golf club shaft 20 wherein the back shaft
portion 22 (the portion facing away from the golf ball during the
down swing) is made thicker than the front shaft portion 24. A
series of thin slits 26 are formed in the rearwardly facing side of
the back portion 22 that are spaced lengthwise of the shaft and lie
in planes that are at right angles to the shaft axis. The slits 26
separate the rearwardly facing side of the shaft back portion into
sections 27 that function similarly to the sections 18 in rendering
the shaft rigid or stiff during rearward flexing and in rendering
the shaft flexible during forward flexing.
As shown in FIG. 7A, this same concept is attainable wherein the
front shaft portion 24' (the portion facing toward the golf ball
during the down swing) of a tubular golf club shaft 20' is made
thicker than the back shaft portion 22'. A series of thin slits 26'
are formed in the rearwardly facing side of the front portion 24'
that are spaced lengthwise of the shaft and lie in planes that are
at right angles to the shaft axis. The slits 26' separate the
rearwardly facing side of the shaft front portion into sections 27'
that function similarly to sections 18 in rendering the shaft rigid
or stiff during rearward flexing and in rendering the shaft
flexible during forward flexing.
In arrangements discussed above, the shaft is rendered rigid
against rearward flexing due to an increase in the compressive
strength of a rearwardly facing side of the shaft. While these
arrangements may also slightly increase the tensile strength of
said shaft side, they do not do so to such an extent as to
materially inhibit the flexibility of the shaft through the impact
zone. In order to increase the compressive strength of a rearwardly
facing side of the shaft without increasing its tensile strength,
the arrangements of FIGS. 8 and 9 may be provided. In these
Figures, metal sections 28 (FIG. 8) or 30 (FIG. 9) extend at least
180.degree. about the periphery of the shaft 16 and are fastened
along the axial centerline of the shaft to the shaft periphery by
fasteners 32. As in the arrangement of FIG. 2, the facing edges of
the sections 28 and 30 are either close to eace other or abut each
other in the unflexed condition of the shaft 16.
* * * * *