U.S. patent number 3,755,803 [Application Number 05/024,319] was granted by the patent office on 1973-08-28 for electronic surveillance system.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Unisearch Limited. Invention is credited to Peter Harold Cole, Richard Vaughn.
United States Patent |
3,755,803 |
Cole , et al. |
August 28, 1973 |
ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM
Abstract
An electronic surveillance system in which a passive label
attached to an article under surveillance is interrogated by means
of a transmitted signal in a first form of energy, the label using
the energy of that signal to return a signal to a receiver which
gives an indication of the presence of the label if a reply signal
has predetermined characteristics. In order to enable the receiver
to distinguish the reply signal from the original transmitted
signal the label is constructed to produce the reply signal in a
form of energy different from that of the original transmitted
signal. It is preferred that the first form of energy is accoustic
energy and the second form of energy is electromagnetic energy.
Inventors: |
Cole; Peter Harold (North
Adelaide, AU), Vaughn; Richard (Maroubra, New South
Wales, AU) |
Assignee: |
Unisearch Limited (Kensington,
New South Wales, AU)
|
Family
ID: |
3739076 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/024,319 |
Filed: |
March 31, 1970 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 2, 1969 [AU] |
|
|
52968/69 |
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
340/572.1;
235/439; 235/488; 340/531; 340/552; 367/93; 340/572.7; 340/572.8;
235/487; 334/39; 367/2 |
Current CPC
Class: |
G06K
19/0672 (20130101); G08B 13/2422 (20130101); G06K
7/0008 (20130101); G08B 13/24 (20130101); G06K
7/10009 (20130101); G08B 13/2471 (20130101); G08B
13/2437 (20130101); G06K 7/086 (20130101); G06K
7/02 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
G08B
13/24 (20060101); G06K 7/02 (20060101); G06K
19/067 (20060101); G06K 7/00 (20060101); G06K
7/10 (20060101); G06K 7/08 (20060101); G08b
013/24 (); H03b 005/30 () |
Field of
Search: |
;340/258,280,282,2
;343/6.5,6.8 ;331/155,158 ;310/8.1,8.2 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Caldwell; John W.
Assistant Examiner: Partridge; Scott F.
Claims
We claim:
1. An electronic surveillance system, comprising transmitter means
for transmitting signals having a first form of energy, a passive
label for attachment to an article to be placed under surveillance,
signal answering means mounted on said label for receiving the
signals from said transmitting means and producing signals having a
second form of energy and corresponding to the received signals,
receiver means responsive to the signals transmitted by said signal
answering means for receiving and processing the signals of the
second form of energy, control means for defining a surveillance
volume, said control means including modulator means coupled to
said transmitter means and rendering said receiver means
unresponsive to signals from said answering means when the phase of
the signals from said answering means relative to the phase of
signals from said transmitter means exceeds a given value.
2. A system as in claim 1, wherein said modulator means constrains
said transmitter means to produce a series of regular pulses and
gate said receiver means synchronously so as to switch on said
receiver means at a predetermined time after the commencement of
each transmitter pulse and for a predetermined period.
3. A system as in claim 1, wherein one of said transmitter means
and said answering means transmit acoustical energy.
4. A system as in claim 1, wherein said transmitter means transmits
acoustical energy.
5. A system as in claim 1, wherein said answering means transmits
acoustical energy.
6. A system as in claim 4, wherein said answering means transmits
electromagnetic energy.
7. A system as in claim 5, wherein said transmitter means transmits
electromagnetic energy.
8. A system as in claim 1, wherein said answering means includes
second receiver means on said label for receiving the signals of
the first form of energy, transducer means on said label coupled to
said receiver means for responding to the signals on said second
receiver means for forming signals of the second form of energy,
and second transmitter means on said label responsive to said
transducer means for transmitting the signals of the second form of
energy.
9. A system as in claim 1, wherein said answering means includes an
electroacoustic resonator on said label.
10. A system as in claim 9, wherein said resonator is
piezoelectric.
11. A system as in claim 9, wherein said resonator is
magnetostrictive.
12. An apparatus as in claim 10, wherein said answering means
includes an antenna connected to said resonator.
13. A system as in claim 1, wherein said label includes a plastic
card having a cutout, said answering means including a
piezoelectric resonator adapted to vibrate in a flexural mode, said
resonator including electrodes attached to the surface of said
piezoelectric resonator, and an antenna formed on the surface of
the card connected to said electrodes.
14. A system as in claim 13, wherein said label includes covering
means sandwiching the plastic card between them for protecting the
resonator and said antenna.
Description
The facilities offered by the present invention provide for the
open or secret interrogation by radio and/or acoustic waves of
information from prepared passive labels by a remote sensing
apparatus.
The intended application of the invention is in the prevention of
theft of merchandise from shops or warehouses, of books in
libraries or of appropriate items in factories or other places, by
tagging such items with a label and locating a receiver covering
each exit so that the unauthorised passage of such tagged items
through each exit will be detected.
The basic principle of operation of any interrogating system for
passive labels is as follows. Energy in some form is transmitted to
the label by a transmitter and transmitting antenna unit. This
energy is then processed in some way by the label, and the
resulting energy retransmitted by the label as a "reply" signal.
This "reply" energy is then detected, suitably processed and
information extracted therefrom by a sensitive receiver and
receiving antenna unit. It is basic to all interrogation systems
that the very small reply energy from the label be distinguished
from the very much larger transmitter or "interrogation" energy.
This distinction can be obtained by various methods; the present
invention utilises a method which achieves the desired result by
incorporating means in the label capable of changing the type of
the energy, so that the reply energy is of a different type from
the interrogate energy. For example in the system described below,
the interrogate energy is in the form of acoustic energy while the
reply energy is in the form of magnetic field energy.
To be successful the system should and does provide the following
features:
A. The labels are passive, with indefinitely long storage life, can
be read non destructively, are durable under various environmental
and handling conditions, are small and have low manufacturing
cost.
B. The labels can have any orientation relative to and considerable
distance from the sensing apparatus, can be in motion, and can be
separated from the sensor by optically opaque barriers.
C. The signal is distinguishable from background clutter signals
accidentally produced by the environment of the label being
interrogated.
A distinction from clutter signals and the encoding of the
information is made by choosing a combination of the type of
interrogate energy and type of reply energy such that apart from
the label, objects found in nature do not possess the necessary
combination of characteristics to enable them to receive the type
of interrogation energy, to convert this energy to the correct type
of reply energy, and then re-radiate this reply energy in the
correct way.
In order to assist in understanding the nature of the invention one
form thereof is hereinafter described by way of example with
reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the basic components of the
system,
FIG. 2 is an isometric view of a label card for use with the
system,
FIGS. 3 and 4 are views in plan and elevation of the label card
showing further details, and
FIG. 5 shows one electrode configuration for the resonator
incorporated in the label.
FIG. 6 is a block diagram of a pulsed system.
The system to be described is intended for detecting the presence
only of a label at a distance of 1 metre, as might be required for
example in a theft-detection system.
The general principle of the system is to provide in the label card
a means of receiving energy in acoustic form, converting it to
electromagnetic energy, and re-radiating it as electromagnetic
energy or more precisely in this case as magnetic energy. Since the
transmitted energy is in acoustic form, and the reply from the
label is in a different energy form, namely magnetic, it is thus
possible to separate the small label "reply" from the large
transmitted "interrogate" signal.
The basic components of the system are shown in the block diagram
in FIG. 1. The system consists of
a. An 100 W, 100kc/s power oscillator 1,
b. A suitable electrical-to-acoustic energy transducer and acoustic
antennae unit 2, (For example a barium titanate piezo-electric
resonator coupled to the atmosphere by an acoustic horn) which is
driven by the power oscillator 1 and radiates acoustic energy
through the air illuminating the volume through-out which it is
desired to detect the label,
c. A label 3 described in detail below,
d. A magnetic coil pair 4 connected to a sensitive receiver 5 which
detects the "reply" magnetic field produced by the label when
illuminated by the acoustic field.
The construction of a suitable passive label is shown in the
isometric drawing FIG. 2. The label consists of an inner plastic
card 6 approximately 2 by 1 inches in size which serves as a
protection and supporting substrate for the inner sensitive
elements. Cardboard covers 7 and 8 sufficiently thin so as to be
essentially transparent to 100 kc/s acoustic radiation, are glued
to each side of the plastic card. Further details of the label are
shown in FIGS. 3 and 4. In FIG. 3 the plastic card 6 and sensitive
element 5 are shown with the cardboard covers 7 and 8 removed.
The acoustic energy is detected by its action in causing resonant
vibration of a 100 kc/s flexural-mode resonator 9. In this example
the resonator 9 shall be taken as being made of quartz, however any
other material having suitable mechanical properties, low acoustic
damping, and high piezoelectric coefficients could be used. The
flexural vibration mode is used to lower the acoustic impedance
level of the resonator and hence to provide a better acoustic
impedance match to the air. Approximate dimensions of the resonator
9 are 1.5 cm long by 0.75 cm wide by 0.010 inch thick. The
resonator 9 is set into a cut-out in the plastic card 6, between
but not in contact with the cardboard covers 7 and 8. In order to
cause minimum damping by its support, it is held at the
flexural-mode vibrational nodal-points by four dimples projecting
from the sides of the cut-out in the plastic card.
Suitable electrodes are plated onto the resonator 9, one possible
electrode configuration being shown in FIG. 5, such that the
acoustic vibrational energy in the resonator is converted to
electrical energy available between the electrodes 10 and 11
through the piezoelectric properties of the quartz.
This electrical energy, or more precisely the piezoelectric
displacement current between electrodes 10 and 11, produces a
current through a 10 turn, one square inch area coil 12 connected
between electrodes 10 and 11. Coil 12 is conveniently produced on
the surface of the plastic card 6 by well-known printed
circuit-board techniques. The magnetic field produced by this
current flow through coil 12 is then detected by the Helmohltz coil
pair 4 and receiver 5, thus enabling the presence of the label to
be detected as required.
Calculations show that the power losses occurring in various parts
of the overall transmission path from transmitter to receiver
are:
a. Acoustic propogation loss from the acoustic transmitter antenna
2 to the acoustic resonator or "receiving antenna" 9 in the label,
-- 41db.
b. Acoustic path absorption between the acoustic transmitting
antenna and the label, -- 3db.
c. Acoustic to electric conversion loss in resonator 9 -- 10db.
d. Magnetic "propogation loss" between the reactive power available
at the resonator 9 output electrodes 10 and 11 to the real power
magnetically induced in the receiving coil-pair 4 -- 75db.
The overall transmission path loss is thus 129db.
The noise bandwidth of the receiver is 1000 c/s. Narrower
bandwidths are not practical due to the acoustic Doppler shift
associated with a person carrying the label through the field. The
consequent input noise level of the receiver allowing for a
receiver noise figure of 3db is -- 171dbW. With a transmitted power
of + 20 dbW, the input signal level at the receiver is 109dbW. The
signal-to-noise ratio at the receiver is thus 62db and the system
is not receiver noise limited.
There are certain obvious variations from the design example
described in detail above which may be made to suit particular
applications.
In particular some of them are:
a. The frequency of operation of the system can be decreased or
increased. Decreasing the frequency improves the system signal to
noise ratio, however the size of the label is also increased.
Increasing the frequency reduces the system signal to noise ratio
and decreases the size of the labels. The attenuation of acoustic
waves through the air also increases with frequency and this has
the important advantage of increasing the discrimination of the
system against spurious signals from labels outside the desired
detection volume since these signals suffer attenuation due to the
longer acoustic propogation path. For example at an operating
frequency of 200 KHZ acoustic attenuation in air is 8 db/m.
Consequently signals from extraneous labels will be attenuated by 8
db per metre of their distance from the detection volume.
b. Due to reciprocity, the system can also be operated in reverse
in the sense that magnetic field energy can be transmitted to the
label by the coil-pair 4, converted to and re-radiated as acoustic
energy by the label, and this acoustic energy received by the
acoustic transducer-antenna 2. This alternative system can have
advantages in installations where the atmospheric magnetic field
noise energy is higher than the atmospheric acoustic noise energy.
Atmospheric acoustic noise energy is normally low at 100 KHZ and
increasingly so at higher frequencies due to the acoustic
attenuation of the air at these frequencies.
c. Changes may be made in transmitter power level.
d. As previously stated, due to acoustic Doppler shift, receiver
bandwidths of less than 1000 c/s are not possible. Hence system
signal to noise ratio cannot be increased by using narrow receiver
bandwidths. However for the same average transmitted power, it is
possible to obtain an increase in signal to noise ratio effectively
equivalent to that achieved by narrowing the receiver bandwidth by
pulsing the transmitter and synchronously time gating the receiver.
The transmitter pulse width will be determined by the receiver
bandwidth, and the pulse repetition frequency by the rate at which
a label will be carried through the detection volume. For a
constant average transmitted power, the signal-to-noise ratio is
increased by the ratio of the pulse repetition period divided by
the pulse width. For the particular embodiment here described,
suitable values are a transmitter pulse length of 6 m/sec, a pulse
repetition period of 300 m/sec, with the receiver synchronously
gated on for a 3 m/sec period following 3 m/sec after the
commencement of each transmitter pulse.
One particular embodiment of such a pulse system is shown in FIG.
6. The principal components are:
1. A 1W, 100kc/s master oscillator 13,
2. A 37 db, 100kc/s gated power amphifier 14 which when gated on by
pulse generator 15 delivers 100W average power, 5 kW peak power to
antenna unit 21. Amplifier 14 is gated on for a 6 msec pulse period
with a pulse repetition period of 300 m sec by pulse generator
15.
3. A suitable electrical-to-acoustic energy transducer and acoustic
antenna unit 21, which is driven by power amplifier 14 and radiates
acoustic energy through the air illuminating the volume through-out
which it is desired to obtect the label.
4. A label 22 identical to label 3 previously described.
5. A magnetic coil pair 24 connected to a sensitive receiver 18
which detects the "reply" magnetic field produced by the label when
illuminated by the acoustic field. The bandwidth of receiver 18 is
1000c/s.
6. A gate 19 following receiver 18 which is gated open by pulse
generator 17 for a 3 m sec period following 3 m sec after the
commencement of each transmitter pulse.
7. A final amplifier and detector unit 20 of bandwidth 1000c/s
which operates an appropriate alarm equipment if the detector
output exceeds a certain threshold level during the on-gated
period.
8. An as table multivibrator pulse generator 15 which provides a 6
m sec pulse having a 300 m sec pulse repetition rate to gated
amplifier 14 plus a trigger pulse to delay generator 16
synchronised with the leading edge of the gating pulse to 14.
9. A monostable multivibrator pulse generator 16 which is triggered
by the trigger pulse from 15 and hence provides a second trigger
pulse to pulse generator 17 delayed 3 m sec after the trigger pulse
from 15.
10. A monostable pulse generator 17 which is triggered by the
delayed trigger pulse from 16 and whence provides a 3 m sec
duration on-gating pulse to receiver gate 19.
e. The use of a pulse system as described in (d) above also enables
the system to eliminate spurious returns from labels outside the
desired detection volume by taking account of the longer acoustic
propogation time to such remote labels. For example for a
transmitter pulse length of 6 m sec and a receiver gate interval of
3 m sec as described in (d) above, returns from labels at distances
greater than 1.8 m will be eliminated.
The particular embodiment herein described has used in the label a
resonator of piezoelectric material which converted received
acoustic energy to electrical energy by menas of the piezoelectric
effect. It is also possible to use a resonator of magnetostrictive
material which converts received acoustic energy to electrical
energy by means of the magnetostructive effect. In the latter case
the fluctuating magnetic moment induced in the magnetostrictive
material would be detected directly by a receiver coil-pair 4 and
no transmitting coil 12 would be necessary on the label.
* * * * *