U.S. patent number 3,754,379 [Application Number 05/114,545] was granted by the patent office on 1973-08-28 for apparatus for electrode rapper control.
Invention is credited to Richard J. Bridges, Paul D. Harper.
United States Patent |
3,754,379 |
Bridges , et al. |
August 28, 1973 |
APPARATUS FOR ELECTRODE RAPPER CONTROL
Abstract
A rapper control senses the particle load collected on selected
electrostatic precipitator electrodes and automatically energizes
corresponding rappers connected to the selected electrodes when the
collected particle load magnitude on the electrodes exceeds a
predetermined limit and de-energizes the rappers when the collected
particle load magnitude obtains a predetermined minimum to optimize
the amount of precipitant on the collecting electrodes. The control
is preferably electronic and is normally used in conjunction with a
plurality of sets of rappers which are independently and
sequentially energized. The load distribution of the particles
collected on the precipitator electrodes is monitored and the
rapper sets are selectively energized in a sequence governed by the
pattern of the particle load distribution. BACKGROUND OF THE
INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention This invention relates
generally to particle separation and more particularly to rapping
means for cleaning the electrodes in an electrostatic precipitator
and is directed to improvements in our previous invention entitled
Frequency and Duration Control for Electrode Rappers as disclosed
in U. S. Pat. No. 3,487,606, which issued Jan. 6, 1970. 2.
Description of the Prior Art As pointed out in our aforesaid patent
disclosure, when particles build up or collect on the plates of an
electrostatic collector, they must be removed in order to maintain
the efficiency of collection. This is normally accomplished by
vibrating or rapping the plates with motorized devices. It is also
pointed out that as the art of electrostatic precipitation
developed, we found that rapping all the collector plates reduced
collection efficiency because all the particles fell into
collection hoppers at one time causing a reentrainment throughout
the precipitator. Controls were developed which energized selected
ones of the plate or wire (electrode) rappers at intervals and for
selected length of time to confine reentrainment to small areas
throughout the precipitator. Our former invention as disclosed in
U. S. Pat. No. 3,487,606, provides a control for regulating the
frequency and duration of energization for sets of rappers with
both the frequency and duration being independently adjustable over
wide ranges. This electronic control permitted greater reliability
and versatility in the control of electrode rapping than
theretofore thought possible. However, experience now indicates
that operating the rappers of a precipitator on a regular interval,
and for fixed rapping times, leads to either overrapping or
underrapping, but seldom to optimum rapping due to the changing
conditions in the precipitator such as conditions of the dirt load,
for example. Overrapping causes excessive reentrainment of the
collected material and, in some instances, excessive precipitator
arcing due to bare spots in the collecting plates and uneven
distribution of coleected material. Underrapping cuses excessive
build-up of the collected material on the plate and wires which
lowers the arcing voltgge and, therefore, reduces the maximum power
input into the precipitator as well as increasing the arcing rates.
Accordingly, the efficiency of the electrostatic precipitator is
impaired when the condition of underrapping or overrapping occurs
It has been further suggested that particle laden hoppers might be
provided with a load cell device placed in a suspension system for
the hopper or collector to permit automatic weighing of the
collected particles in order to alert the operator to the fact that
the device requires cleaning (See U. S. Pat. No. 3,505,790 issued
Apr. 14, 1970 to Edmund F. Rothemich for Dust Collector.) However,
no one until the present has devised, suggested or conceived of a
rapper control which will automatically optimize the amount of
precipitant on the collecting plates and wires of the electrostatic
precipitator nor realized the need for such a control. SUMMARY OF
THE INVENTION Accordinly, the principal object of the present
invention is to provide a rapper control which senses the particle
load collected on selected precipitator electrodes, and in response
thereto, energizes corresponding rappers connected to the selected
electrodes when the collected particle load magnitude exceeds a
predetermined limit. It can also deenergize the rappers when the
collected particle load magnitude obtains a predetermined minimum
in order to optimize the amount of precipitant remaining on the
collecting electrodes of the electrostatic precipitator. This is
preferably accomplished with the use of solid state electronics and
in larger precipitator installations the control includes means for
monitoring the load distribution of the precipitant collected in
the precipitator and selectively energizes corresponding rappers or
rapper sets in a sequense governed by the pattern of the load
distribution in the precipitator such that no two rapper sets are
simultaneously energized, thereby minimizing any disturbance due to
rapping in the precipitator. When the load sensing means senses
that the rapping has been sufficiently carried out to obtain the
optimum particle load collected on the selected precipitator
electrodes, the control is responsive to deenergize the
corresponding rappers and the process of sequentially monitoring
the particle load distribution on the precipitator electrodes is
continued until another monitored load limit is attained or
exceeded within the load distribution pattern. Another object of
the present invention is to provide means for regulating the
duration of energization of a rapper or rapper set to a time length
defined within maximum and minimum desired particle load magnitude
collected on corresponding portions of selected precipitator
electrodes. Another object of the present invention is to provide
an intensity control means which starts rapping of the selected
electrodes at a preset intensity level and then automatically
raises this intensity to a maximum This is preferaby accomplished
by changing the conduction angle of a triac switch employed to
switch an electromagnetically operated rapper. Another object of
the present invention is to provide means in the control to vary
the rapidity of sequentially monitoring the different particle load
magnitudes in portions of the total precipitator distribution
pattern. Still another object of the present invention is the
provision of an on-timer circuit which is operable to discontinue
the energization of any one rapper or rapper set, when the optimum
particle load minimum has been exceeded as sensed by a load sensing
device when the control fails to function normally to discontinue
rapping upon obtaining the desired minimum particle load collected
on the corresponding precipitator electrodes. The preferred
electronic rapper control of the present invention incorporates
weight sensors which are all adjusted such that a signal is
produced when the proper weight is attained. An N or ripple counter
clock strobes a decoder in a search manner such that any signals
coming from the weight sensor will not pass through the decoder
until the counter reaches the count corresponding to the number of
the sensor in question. At this point, the signal passes the
decoder, oeprates the corresponding rapper set, simultaneously
stops the N-counter and energizes the on-timer circut. Other bjects
and advantages appear hereinafter in the following description and
claims. The accompanying drawings show, for the purpose of
exemplification without limiting the invention or the claims
thereto, certain practical embodiments illustrating the principles
of this invention.
Inventors: |
Bridges; Richard J.
(Pittsburgh, PA), Harper; Paul D. (Pittsburgh, PA) |
Family
ID: |
22355912 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/114,545 |
Filed: |
February 11, 1971 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
96/18; 96/25;
96/36 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B03C
3/66 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B03C
3/66 (20060101); B03c 003/76 () |
Field of
Search: |
;55/10,11,104,106,108,109,110,112,139,148 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Other References
Seegmiller, W. R., "Controlled Rectifiers Drive A-C and D-C
Motors," Electronics, Nov. 13, 1959, pages 73-74..
|
Primary Examiner: Talbert, Jr.; Dennis E.
Claims
We claim:
1. An electrostatic precipitator having electrodes, rapping means
therefor, and an electronic logic control for regulating the
frequency and duration of rapper energization comprising:
a clock pulse generator circuit for producing a series of clock
pulses at a selected frequency having first and second logic
levels;
a ripple counting circuit operative in response to first and second
logic levels of said clock pulses to produce monitoring sequence
pulses having first and second logic levels;
a load sensing circuit operable to sense the particle load
magnitudes collected on different selected ones of said electrodes
and produce in response to said sensing load pulses having first
and second logic levels indicative of a desired rapping on-time and
off-time respectively as defined within a maximum and minimum
desired particle load magnitude for each of said different selected
ones of electrodes;
a decoding monitor circuit operable in response to said first and
second logic levels of said monitoring sequence pulses and to said
load pulses for sequentially monitoring said load pulses and
selectively producing rapper driving pulses having first and second
logic levels, said rapper driving pulses being produced in separate
output channels corresponding in number to and respectively
associated with each of said different selected ones of electrodes
and being sequentially selected by said first and second logic
levels of said monitoring sequence pulses when the on-time is
indicated by said first and second logic levels of the respective
one of said load pulses then being monitored;
a rapping means driving circuit having associated channels for
connecting said rapper driving pulses to respective ones of said
rapping means respectively associated with said different selected
ones of said electrodes for energization;
means responsive to said first and second logic levels of said
rapper driving pulses to interrupt the feed of said series of clock
pulses to said ripple counting circuit during said rapping on-time
and activate the feed of said series of clock pulses to said ripple
counting circuit during said rapping off-time; and
an on-timer circuit operable in response to said first and second
logic levels of said rapper driving pulses for timing a maximum
allowable duration of energization of any of said rapping means and
reactivating the feed of said series of clock pulses to said ripple
counting circuit in the event said maximum time is attained.
2. The control of claim 1 including means for regulating the
intensity of said rapper energization.
3. The control of claim 1 wherein said load sensing circuit
includes a plurality of load cell actuated switches connected
respectively to a corresponding number of bi-stable flip-flops,
said switches operable to set and reset said flip-flops for
producing said load pulses.
4. The control of claim 3 wherein said load cell actuated switches
include means for setting a maximum and minimum load actuation
switching limit therefor corresponding to said desired maximum and
minimum particle load magnitudes respectively.
5. The control of claim 1 including an annunciator circuit
responsive to load cells in said load sensing circuit for producing
alarm signals when said particle load magnitude is above said
maximum magnitude by a preselected amount and said particle load
magnitude is below said minimum magnitude by a selected amount.
6. The control of claim 1 further including:
a solid state switch for completing a current path upon being made
conductive for a current supply to each of said rappers for
energization thereof;
each of said switches connected to corresponding ones of said
channels and made conductive during the duration of said monitored
load pulses present on the respective channels;
whereby said rappers are energized in a sequence and for a time
regulated by need.
7. An electrostatic precipitator for removing particles from a gas
comprising:
discharge electrodes for applying an electrostatic charge to said
particles,
collecting electrodes for collecting said charged particles,
a plurality of rappers operable upon energization for vibrating
preselected portions of said collecting electrodes to remove
particles collected thereon,
means for sequentially monitoring the amount of precipitant load
collected on said preselected collecting electrode portions,
means for interrupting said means for monitoring and energizing
said rappers having corresponding collecting electrode precipitant
loads exceeding a predetermined limit upon being monitored,
means for de-energizing said energized rappers and reactivating
said means for monitoring when said precipitant load attains a
predetermined minimum,
and on-timer means for reactivating said means for monitoring upon
the failure of said means for de-energizing the rappers and
reactivating the means for monitoring to function after a maximum
predetermined period of energization time required for attaining
said minimum predetermined precipitant load.
8. The electrostatic precipitator of claim 7 including means for
rigidly supporting said collecting electrodes, said means for
sequentially monitoring the amount of said collected precipitant
load including pressure sensitive load cell devices operatively
positioned in said rigid supporting means to sense in the tension
or compression mode the weight of respective of said preselected
collecting electrode portions plus the corresponding precipitant
load collected thereon.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
In the drawings wherein like parts are marked alike:
FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of the rapper
control of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is an electrical schematic diagram illustrating the rapper
control shown in FIG. 1 in greater detail.
FIG. 3 is a perspective view of one embodiment of a weight sensor
which may be incorporated in the control of the present
invention.
FIG. 4 is a perspective view of the preferred embodiment of a
weight sensor to be employed in the control of the present
invention.
FIG. 5 is an electrical schematic diagram illustrating one
embodiment of the weight sesor circuit, on-timer circuit, and clock
circuit shown in the control system illustrated in FIGS. 1 and
2.
FIG. 6 is an electrical schematic diagram illustrating one
embodiment of the rapper drivers and switches employed in the
control system illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2.
FIG. 7 is a diagrammatic illustration of an alternative embodiment
of the present invention employing pneumatic controls.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
In the well-known art of electrostatic precipitators, the various
materials or particles to be collected are charged by high voltage
between a number of plates and wires suspended between the plates.
The material s normally attracted to the plates which are at ground
potential. Some material is also attracted to the wires which are
at a high negative potential.
The automatic rapper control described herein senses the weight of
the material collected on the plates or electrodes and provides a
control signal to energize rappers until the weight of th collected
material is reduced to its predetermined level. Thus, a closed loop
system is established. Since the amount, or volume, of the given
material is proportional to weight, sensing its weight provides the
information needed to control the rappers. Naturally, any signal
proportional to weight can be derived by many techniques and
conditioned to work properly in this control.
Referring now to FIG. 1, the control system of the present
invention is illustrated in block diagram form wherein the system
is shown for N rapper sets to illustrate its inherent flexibiiity
fo use with either one rapper set or many. For each rapper set,
there is a corresponding switch and driver which simply provides
the power amplification needed to drive the rappers. The drivers
also may contain additional circuitry for the purpose of starting
the rapper set at a predetermined intensity level and automatically
raising this intensity to a maximum. This, of course, minimizes the
reentrainment of the collected material by first generally removing
the heavier collected load portions, and thereafter increasing the
intensity of rapping to remove the precipitant more closely adhered
to the electrodes.
There are N weight sensors shown, each with characteristics such
that a signal is produced when a given weight is reached, and the
signal is removed when the weight decreases to some weight lower
than the first by a predetermined amount. For all the sensors, the
two weight levels are adjustable whereby the first weight, called
"heavy" for example, and the second weight, called "normal" for
example, can be adjusted over a wide range.
The decoder block, connected to the outputs of the N weight sensors
and the inputs of the N drivers, essentially forms a routing
network which determines the order and the frequency of rapping
depending upon the inputs from the weight sensors and the
N-counter. The N-counter and clock form a free running counter of a
count equal to the number of rapper sets. The frequency of the
count, of course, may be made adjustable by varying the clock time.
The on-timer provides an overriding control signal to the N-counter
clock to prevent excessive rapping to any given rapper set.
The operation of the system can be basically divided into "normal"
and "abnormal" classifications where "normal" denotes the operation
expected on a normal day-to-day basis and "abnormal" for unexpected
situations, such a the failure of some component in the system or a
circuit upset due to electrical interference, etc.
Under conditions of normal operation, the weight sensors are all
adjusted such that a signal is produced when the proper weight
limit is obtained. The N-counter strobes the decoder in a search
manner such that any signals coming from the weight sensors will
not pass through the decoder until the N-counter reaches the count
corresponding to the number of the sensor in question. Thus, if the
first sensor reaches "heavy" weight, a signal from the sensor
reaches the decoder but waits for the N-counter to reach a "one"
count. At this point, a signal passes the decoder and operates the
first rapper set. Since the clock is designed to count quickly, a
minimal delay is experienced from the time a sensor indicates
"heavy" and the corresponding rapper set operates.
Simultaneous to the rapper set energization, the on-tier circuit is
started by the decoder. The output produced by the decoder is also
used to stop the clock so that the search mode ceases. Thus the
rapper set is operated in response to the weight sensor which has
indicated a sufficient dirt build-up on a precipitator plate to
cause the system to respond.
The on-timer is capable of producing an output for a time which is
set to be no longer than needed to clean the plate of the desired
amount of collected material. Thus, the on-timer forms a time limit
on the operation of any given rapper set. Under normal rapping
conditions, the weight sensor would indicate that the plate weight
had returned to "normal" long before the on-timer was expended,
thus causing the rapper set to stop operation.
As soon as any given weight sensor returns to "normal" the on-timer
is reset which restarts the clock and causes the N-counter to go
into search mode. Thus, any weight sensors indicating "heavy" will
operate rapper sets in the order of the N-counter. This feature is
important in that no two rapper sets are ever energized
simultaneously, thereby minimizing any disturbance due to rapping
in the precipitator.
In the event that the weight sensor fails to return to "normal" in
the allotted on-time for any reason whatsoever, the on-timer will
time out, stop the corresponding rapper set and allow the clock
N-counter to start the search mode, thus allowing any other rapper
sets to operate on "heavy" plates. Eventually, the N-counter would
return to the original "heavy" sensor (if it remained "heavy"), and
rap it again until the defect is corrected.
Occasionally, the aforementioned operation might conceivably occur
and reoccur even though the system is set for the expected normal
mode of operation. For example, an extra heavy dirt load in the
precipitator for a short time might cause one or more plates to
continue to build up unexpectedly. If this condition prevails,
readjustment of the system of a new "normal" operation level would
be required to eliminate such build-up. The value of the on-timer
becomes apparent under abnormal conditions were, for instance,
components in the mechanical or electrical system fail in such a
way as to make a weight sensor appear "heavy" for an extended
period of time. In this event, the rest of the system would
function normally even though a malfunction had occurred.
Provisions are made in the weight sensor to sound appropriate
operator alarms in the event that a plate becomes extremely light
or extremely heavy (for instance, if a rapper stays on or remains
off). This alerts the operator to the problem while the remainder
of the rapper system continues to function normally. These same
load limit sensors are also used to reset the circuitry of the
rapper control in the event that electrical interference causes a
rapper to stay on or off for a prolonged period of time.
The basic weight sensor device incorporated in the system of the
present invention may be one of many types such as a hydraulic load
cell with a Bourdon tube readout (which is preferred) employing
various types of contacts, strain gauges, differential
transformers, mechanical readouts, etc. The types of contacts
employed in these devices are also various such as photoelectric
devices, magnetically operated reed switches, direct contacts, etc.
Furthermore, these load cells or sensors may be operated in the
tension mode or in the compression mode to weigh a part of the
entire mechanical electrode assembly plus the collected material.
For purposes of illustration, the weight sensor herein first
described will be of a type employing micro switches as shown in
FIG. 3, as it is believed that the principles of the present
invention will thus be visually illustrated with greater simplicity
and clarity even though it is not the preferred embodiment.
The load cell device 10 illustrated in FIG. 3 is operated in the
compression mode. This particular load cell device has adjustable
actuators 11 and 12 adjustably positioned by means of adjusting
screws 13 and 14, respectively, to provide a predetermined distance
between actuators 11 and 12 and corresponding limit arms 15 and 16
of limit switches 17 and 18, respectively. Limit switches 17 and 18
are fixed in mount 19 which is in turn secured to the upper surface
of the bottom leg of the C-shaped force spring 20.
Safety limit post 21 is secured to the bottom leg of the C-shaped
force spring 20 adjacent mount 19 such that it is disposed directly
between opposing surfaces of the top and bottom legs of the C
spring in order to limit the downward movement of the upper leg and
thereby protect the limit switches 17 and 18.
All these components combine to form a force control switch which
is housed in weather tight housing 22 which has its front face
cover plate removed to permit viewing of the force control
switch.
The upper leg of the C spring 20 is flexed by the downward movement
of spring compression rod 23 which is provided with a ball and
socket arrangement 24 at its lower end to permit relative movable
engagement with spring 20.
Boot 25 permits up and down movement of rod 23 while maintaining
the housing 22 water tight.
Compression rod 23 is in turn adjustably secured to the forward end
of level arm 26 which is in turn pivoted at its rearward end as
indicated at 27 to the upward support 28. Support 28 and housing 22
are rigidly secured in relation to each other by means of mounting
bolts as indicated which secure them respectively to the same roof
plate 29 covering precipitator collector electrodes (not shown)
which are suspended therefrom and thereunder by means of support
rods such as indicated at 30 and 31.
The basic arrangement illustrated here shows one side of a four
point suspension system wherein the load cell device 10 measures a
portion of the collector plate unit suspended therebelow together
with its collected particle load. Obviously, the load cells could
also be mounted on all four corners but the present description is
centered around weighing one corner of the assembly. In any event,
the load cell is provided with adjustable contacts in order to
permit one to predetermine the amount of weight that is desired for
removal for a particular rapping period by weighing the total
amount of weight, including plates or wires, plus the collected
materials, so that the rapping can be appropriately controlled.
Support rod 30 has its upward end directly connected to pivot arm
26 in order to transfer a portion of the weight of the precipitator
plus its particle load to compression arm 23 and subsequently to
the upper arm of the C-shaped spring 20 in order to compress the
same and actuate limit switches 17 and 18 when corresponding
predetermined particle load limits are obtained.
The upper end of support rod 30 is threaded in order to permit
vertical adjustmett by means of the nut 32 which bears on washer 33
and the pivot arm mounting plate 34. A flexible dust boot 35
provides a suitable dust seal between the precipitator and the load
cell device.
An electromagnetic rapper 36 is positioned to the right of the load
sensing device 10 and is supported directly on the end of rapper
rod 37 which in turn has its lower end connected directly to the
precipitator collecting cell in order to impart the rapper
vibrations thereto to remove the collected precipitant. Dust boot
38 seals the opening in the roof plate 29 through which the rapper
rod 37 passes and also permits vibratory movement of rod 37.
A preferred weight sensor of the Bourdon tube type equipped with
photoelectric cells is illustrated in FIG. 4. This type may be
readily substituted for the load cell device of FIG. 3. The Bourdon
tub gauged is considered to be a more practical and accurate means
for performing the weight sensing function of the present
invention.
Here, the switching operation is similar to the device 10 of FIG.
3. Two photoelectric switches (not shown) housed within
photoelectric switch assembly 50 (not shown) and preset by upper
and lower trip set needles 51 and 52, serve the same function as
micro limit switches 18 and 17, respectively, of FIG. 3. Two
hydraulic safety limit switches SW3 and SW4 are also provided for
the event that the "normal" and "heavy" collected particle load
conditions sensed by assembly 50 are exceeded due to electrical or
mechanical breakdown in the precipitator control.
Hydraulic load cell 53 is placed in the tension mode in this
application, being supported at the top by support frame 54 and
supporting a corner of the collecting cell unit 55 from its other
end via support rod 56. The load cell assembly 58 is provided with
a center weight pointer 57 that deflects to the left to trip the
set needle 52 when the collected particle load on unit 55 has
reached a "heavy" condition, and moves to the right or up to trip
the trip needle 51 when a "normal" collected particle load
condition is attained. Such Bourdon pointers are well known. The
pointer 57 merely reacts to the hydraulic fluid pressure in load
cell 51 via hydraulic lines 59, as does also safety switches SW3
and SW4. The photoelectric switches within housing 50 are actuated
by a flag (not shown) on the internal portion of pointer 57 which
passes through photoelectric beams as will be explained further on
in greater detail.
Now referring to logic diagram FIG. 2, an eight rapper set system
is described.
In FIG. 2 there are eight weight sensor limit switch sets, LS-1
chrough LS-8, corresponding respectively to each respective rapper
set No. 1 through rapper set No. 8 which appear at the right-hand
side of the figure. Each of the limit switch sets LS-1 through LS-8
include therein switches SW1, SW2, SW3 and SW4. Switches SW1 and
SW2 are for "normal" particle load sensing and for 'heavy" particle
load sensing, respectively, in each of the weight sensor load cell
devices employed, such as indicated in FIG. 3.
For the purpose of illustration, FIG. 2 will first be discussed in
conjunction with FIG. 3. Micro switch SW1 of FIG. 2 would be housed
in limit switch 17 illustrated in FIG. 3 and micro switch SW2 would
be housed in limit switch 18.
Switches SW3 and SW4 are employed only under abnormal operation
conditions as previously discussed. Switch SW3 closes only in the
event that overrapping occurs and switch SW4 closes only in the
event of underrapping due to a system failure. These switches, SW3
and SW4, may be mounted in the same manner as illustrated for
switches SW1 and SW 2 (limit switches 17 and 18) as illustrated in
FIG. 3. They may be mounted in the same assembly shown in FIG. 3 or
in any similar manner. In any event, they actuate only when the
collected precipitant weight from the precipitator electrodes
becomes less than or greater than the predetermined desired amount
which is normally regulated by the operation of switches SW1 and
SW2. The operation and function of the annunciator switches SW3 and
SW4 will be explained in greater detail hereinafter.
In order to provide the proper switch logic combination as required
for the logic circuits of switches SW1 and SW2 contained in each
limit switch set LS-1 through LS-8, switches SW1 and SW2 must be
designed and adjusting screws 13 and 14 of FIG. 3 positioned such
that the switches are never closed simultaneously. To accomplish
this, switches SW1 and SW2 are designed to close when their limit
arms 15 and 16 (FIG. 3) are depressed to a given position and then
open again when their limit arms are depressed further by a small
increment. The same operation occurs in reverse when their limit
arms are released. Thus, by judicious adjustment of screws 13 and
14, switch SW1 (17) can be made to close and open before SW2 (18)
closes as the weight on the collecting electrode increases and
applies a downward force on the upper leg of C-shaped spring 20. As
the weight decreases due to rapping, the reverse sequence of
operation by SW1 and SW2 will occur, that is, SW2 will open before
SW1 closes and opens. Since the operating characteristics of
switches SW1 (17) and SW2 (18) are fixed by the physical assembly
of the load sensor 10, the setting of adjustment screws 13 and 14
therefore permits one to regulate the desired particle load limits
for "normal" and "heavy" precipitant loads by setting the switching
points of SW1 and SW2 respectively. The ability to adjust these
points provides the much desired flexibility to tailor the rapping
system to the particular precipitator rapping needs with respect to
the amount of precipitant collected to initiate rapping and the
amount removed by rapping.
As previously mentioned, many other weight sensing load cell
devices may be employed other than that illustrated in FIG. 3. For
example, a preferred hydraulic load cell with a Bourdon tube
readout employing a photoelectric device may be substituted as
shown in FIG. 4. As the collected precipitant load increases,
pointer 57 is pivoted or otherwise moved by the pressure exerted
from the Bourdon tube. The flag of this pointer is thus free to
pass through the exterior field of view of two spaced photoelectric
switches thereby activating switch SW1 as the pointer blocks the
light source of the upper photoelectric device (preset by trip set
needle 51) when "normal" precipitant load has been achieved, and
will pass thereon through to immediately open switch SW1 again and
will then continue on its movement to the second (lower)
photoelectric device (preset by trip needle 52) as the precipitant
load increases until the pointer activates the second photo
electric device to close (and open again after a further small
increment of movement) switch SW2 to indicate a "heavy")
precipitant load. This feature as previously explained is designed
into the switching mechanism in order to prevent switches SW1 and
SW2 from being closed simultaneously. This is required in order to
operate flip-flops FF-1 through FF-8 in the desired manner for the
operation of the rapper-set controls.
Masterslave flip-flops FF-1 through FF-8 are bistable, thus
providing one of two logic outputs. The truth table describing
operation of this type of flip-flop in conjunction with the weight
sensor switches is as follows:
TRUTH TABLE I
Switch- Col- ing lecting INPUTS OUTPUTS Sequence Electrode Steps
Weight R SW1 S SW2 Q Q Rapper 1 Below 1 Open 1 Open 0 1 Off Normal
2 Normal 0 Closes 1 Open 0 1 Off 3 Increasing 1 Opens 1 Open 0 1
Off 4 Heavy 1 Open 0 Closes 1 0 On 5 Decreasing 1 Open 1 Opens 1 0
On 6 Normal 0 Closes 1 Open 0 1 Off
Cycle repeats at Step 3. Switches SW1 and SW2 are normally open and
a fixed bias representing a logic 1 is placed on the S(set) and
R(reset) terminals from terminal B via resistors R1 and R2 to
reduce the possibility of noice interference. In the truth table,
the numeral 1 indicates a positive voltage and the numeral 0
indicates no voltage. The design of flip-flops FF-1 through FF-8
are such that a 1 on both the R and S terminal causes no change in
the state of operation of the flip-flop. A logic 1 on the Q output
of each flip-flop FF-1 through FF-8 represents the output signal,
while a logic 0 represents no signal.
For the purposes of explanation, we will assume that to begin with
there is no precipitant load on the precipitator plate. As the
weight of the collected precipitant increases, the weight on the
load cell icreases until the predetermined weight for "normal"
precipitant load is obtained. At this time, switch SW1 of the
corresponding limit switch LS-1 through LS-8 is closed or closes
and this places a ground or a logic 0 on the R terminal of the
corresponding flip-flop FF-1 through FF-8. A logic 1 remains on the
S terminal of the flip-flop.
According to the truth table, the Q output of the flip-flop in
question remains at a logic 0 regardless of how many times the R
terminal goes to a logic 0 under these conditions, so long as a
logic 1 remains on the S terminal. Thus, it will be noted that two
logic 1's do not change the state of the RS flip-flop. The state of
the flip-flop only changes when one of the terminals is driven with
a logic 0 while the other remains a logic 1. As previously noted,
switches SW1 and SW2 are designed such that it is impossible to
obtain simultaneously a logical 0 on the R and S inputs of
flip-flops FF-1 through FF-8 at the same time in order to provide
or obtain the proper input conditions for the flip-flops so that
the operation thereof will be as indicated by the truth table.
Accordingly, after switch SW1 closes, it is automatically reopened
quickly thereafter as indicated at steps 3 of the table, in order
to prevent the simultaneous occurrence of a logic 0 on both the R
and S terminals when the proper conditions are maintained for
switch SW1 to close.
As the collected precipitant load continues to apply more pressure
to the weight sensor load cell, no changes take place until the
weight continues to increase in a sufficient amount to activate
switch SW2 indicating that a "heavy" precipitant load has been
obtained. At this point, the S terminal now has a logic 0 present
while the R terminal retains its logic 1. Accordingly, the
corresponding flip-flop will change states to have a Q output of a
logic 1.
As will be explained hereinafter, when the conditions of step 4 of
truth table 1 occur, a logic 1 is obtained at the Q terminal of the
corresponding flip-flop, which we will assume at the moment
energizes the corresponding rapper set. As the collected particle
load diminishes due to the rapping, the weight applied to the
weight sensor load cell device is diminished, thus withdrawing the
contact which in the previous instance of step 4 had closed switch
SW2, thereby opening switch SW2 again as indicated in step 5.
As the collected precipitant weight continues to decrease no change
of the state of the RS flip-flop occurs until the switch SW1 closes
at the time the precipitant weight collected diminishes to
"normal." This applies a logic 0 to terminal R of the corresponding
flip-flop to change the state thereof. When the Q output thus
becomes a logic 0 at step 6, the corresponding rapper set is then
deenergized. This represents one complete cycle of operation of the
weight sensor. As the precipitator weight begins to once again
increase, the cycle will repeat.
If we are dealing with a small precipitator unit which incorporates
only one rapper set, then the output Q of the corresponding
flip-flop, such as the flip-flop FF-1, for example, can be
connected directly to a rapper set driving means which is
functional to turn on the rapper set when presented with a logic 1
from the corresponding flip-flop Q output, and to deenergize the
rapper set when a logic 0 output is obtained. However, when a
plurality of rapper sets must be employed for a large precipitator
unit, as illustrated in FIG. 2, then the decoder is preferably
provided as indicated to prevent activation of more than one rapper
set at one time.
There is a possibility that noise interference with any of the
circuitry could be present and cause the rappers to turn on or off
prematurely. Furthermore, it is also possible that the rappers may
become very weak, or possibly, the micro switch assembly or
photoelectric switch assembly used in conjunction with switches SW1
and SW2, may become defective. There is the additional possibility
that the rappers may unexpectedly short to ground by causing them
to remain on. In order to temporarily correct the situation, the
aforementioned upper and lower limit switches SW3 and SW4 are
provided for each load cell device. These switches perform two
functions. In the event of noise, the upper and lower limit will
reset the masterslave flip-flops FF-1 through FF-8 into the proper
mode of operation by grounding either the R or S terminal. At the
same time, these switches are operable to ground an alarm light or
horn to inform the operator of the particular problem. An example
of this alarm device is indicated in conjunction with switch SW4 of
limit switch set LS-1 of FIG. 2. Here, a lamp L1 is used as the
alarm signal and is supplied with a dc voltage as indicated. When
switch SW4 is activated, the lamp L1 is grounded such that it is
energized and at the same time the S terminal of flip-flop FF-1 is
also grounded to apply a logic 0 to the S terminal thereby changing
the state in the flip-flop to cause energization in the rapper set
1, assuming that the same failed to energize previously. As similar
lamp circuit could be used in conjunction with SW3 to indicate a
light precipitant load due to a rapper over-rapping.
The N or eight-count counter consists of J-K flip-flops, IC-A,
IC-B, and IC-C. These flip-flops form a standard ripple counter
which is well known in the art. The eight counter is driven by the
clock circuit which is shown in block form. The clock can eaily be
made by using a unijunction transistor circuit or similar circuit
and, simply provides evenly spaced pulses at predetermined
intervals. The D input to the clock is provided for the purpose of
stopping the pulse output of the clock when desired.
The N-counter or sequencing circuit J-K flip-flops IC-A, IC-B, and
IC-C, count the clock or timing pulses on line C emitted from the
clock producing a different binary number for each pulse. The N(8)
different binary numbers are then converted into N(8) different
outputs by the decoder including N(8) logic NAND gates. This
sequencing or counter circuit will thus produce N different
sequenced outputs, for example, eight outputs as shown in FIG.
2.
The operation of the counter or sequencing circuit is well known
and a detailed explanation of this operation may be had by
referring to a description of the same in our U. S. Pat. No.
3,487,606 which issued Jan. 6, 1970 for Frequency and Duration
Control for Electrode Rappers.
Truth table No. 2 applies for flip-flops IC-A, IC-B, and IC-C.
TRUTH TABLE 2
IC-A IC-B IC-C Clock Pulse Q.sub.1 Q.sub.1 Q.sub.2 Q.sub.2 Q.sub.3
Q.sub.3 0 - - - - 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 - - - - 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 - - - - 1 0 0
1 1 0 3 - - - - 0 1 0 1 1 0 4 - - - - 1 0 1 0 0 1 5 - - - - 0 1 1 0
0 1 6 - - - - 1 0 0 1 0 1 7 - - - - 0 1 0 1 0 1 8 - - - - 1 0 1 0 1
0
as explained in our aforementioned patent, the sequencing or
counting circuit is easily adapted or reconstructed so that any
number of flip-flops may be added or withdrawn in order to count
the desired N binary numbers depending upon the number of rapper
sets being operated by the control.
The N counter or sequencing circuit output is appropriately
connected to the decoder input NAND gates IC-1 through IC-8 such
that they are sequentially, but not simultaneously, strobed or made
ready to open or turn on provided an input is also being received
by the respective NAND gate from its corresponding weight sensor
indicating a "heavy" precipitant load condition. Thus, each of
these NAND gates IC-1 through IC-8 is connected to its
correspondingly numbered RS flip-flop FF-1 through FF-8 in the
weight sensor circuit. The remaining inputs of the decoder NAND
gates are connected to the N-counter flip-flops to sense the eight
unique binary numbers formed by the flip-flops of the eight
counter. Thus, the outputs from any of the NAND gates IC-1 through
IC-8 will change to a logic 0 state only in the presence of the
eight counter number decoded by that gate and a logic 1 level from
that gate's corresponding weight sensor RS flip-flop FF-1 through
FF-8. In this manner, the weight sensors are sequentially monitored
for sensing a "heavy" condition; however, they are not necessarily
monitored in numerical order as presented as is the case in the
control illustrated in FIG. 2.
To explain the operation of the decoder in a different manner,
these NAND gates are connected to the flip-flops IC-A, IC-B, and
IC-C, so that each clock pulse will cause only one gate at a time
to change states. The truth table for the NAND gates is given in
truth table 3.
TRUTH TABLE 3
INPUTS NAND OUTPUTS 1 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1
0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0
1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0
these gates thus provide a logic 0 output when any of the
respective gates changes state to initiate a rapper set. This
output then serves to energize the corresponding driver circuits,
switches, and rapper sets and is also used to start the on-timer
network shown in block form via the NAND gate IC-D which forms
another portion of the decoder circuit.
NAND gate IC-D isolates the different outputs of the decoder and
provides the appropriate logic level to start the on-timer and stop
the clock and N-counter for the duration of the on-time of the
respective decoder NAND gate.
This arrangement therefore allows only one rapper set to operate
upon command of the corresponding weight sensor at any given time,
regardless of the remaining sensor state. It also provides a limit
on rapping time by the on-timer and suspends the search operation
provided by the eight counter and decoder network as long as one of
the rappers remains energized.
Referring now to FIG. 5, a detailed version of the on-timer and
clock of FIG. 2 is illustrated. For convenience, the operation of
the control system will be described concurrently with the
construction.
Before initial rapping of any rapper set occurs, when all plates or
wires are clean, the system is energized by the application of the
B+ as indicated in FIGS. 2 and 4. The B+ is normally a dc voltage
determined by the type of logic elements used in the circuit
design.
Assuming for the moment that none of the weight sensor switches
sense a "heavy" precipitant load, all the Q outputs of FF-1 to FF-8
will be at logic 0 and the outputs of gates IC-1 to IC-8 at logic
1. This condition will cause the output of NAND gate IC-D to be at
logic 0 as well as preventing any rappers from being energized.
Referring to FIG. 5, the logic 0 from IC-D will enter the clock
circuit on line D causing switching transistor Q5 to be in an "off"
state, thus allowing capacitor C.sub.2 to be charged through
resistor R.sub.13 and potentiometer P.sub.1. When capacitor C.sub.2
reaches a voltage determined by the parameters of unijunction
transistor Q2, capacitor C.sub.2 will discharge through transistor
Q2 through resistor R19, producing a voltage pulse. This voltage
pulse is coupled to the base of switching transistor Q3 causing its
collector to change from a voltage corresponding to a logic 1 to a
logic 0. Thus, a logic 0 pulse is produced at the output of the
clock circuit which is coupled through NAND gate IC-10 to line C
which places a logic 1 pulse on the eight counter causing the count
to advance by one. The clock will continue to produce output pulses
to the eight counter with a time base determined by potentiometer
P1 and capacitor C2. Thus, by adjusting potentiometer P1, a wide
range of pulse rates, and therefore counting rates of the eight
counter, can be obtained. This ultimately determines the search
rate of the system as it scans the weight sensor switches for
"heavy" conditions.
As long as all the weight sensor switches remain "normal," a logic
0 remains on line D. This logic 0 is inverted by IC-9 to a logic 1
on line A which is the input to the on-timer circuit as shown in
FIG. 5. The logic 1 on A causes switching transistor Q1 to remain
"on" which prevents capacitor C1 from charging. The unijunction
transistor Q3 and switching transistor Q4 operate in a similar
manner to transistors Q2 and Q3 in the clock circuit. Thus, as long
as capacitor C1 remains discharge, the on-timer circuit remains
quiescent with an output of logic 1 to gate IC-10.
If any of the weight sensors reach a "heavy" condition, its
corresponding flip-flop (one of FF-1 through FF-8) will have a Q
output of logic 1. As soon as the eight-counter reaches the count
of the corresponding gate (one of IC-1 through IC-8), the gate's
output will change from a logic 1 to a logic 0 immediately
energizing the corresponding rapper set. Simultaneously, the logic
level on line D will change from a0 to a1, preventing capacitor C2
on the clock circuit from charging, stopping the pulse output from
the clock. This suspends the search mode for the duration of the
rapping. The logic 1 on line D is converted to a logic 0 on line A
which releases capacitor C1 of the on-timer. Thus, the charging of
C1 initiates the on-time. Potentiometer P2 determines the length of
this on-time over a wide range of variation.
At this point, one of two possibilities exist in the system. Under
normal operation, the on-time is set such that the precipitant load
will decrease to the "normal" weight before the on-timer times out.
If abnormal circumstances exist, the weight may not return to
"normal" and the on-timer will time-out first.
If the normal operation prevails, the weight will reach a "normal"
load causing the weight sensor to stop rapping. This causes the
logic 1 on line D to change back to a logic 0, clamping capacitor
C1 of the on-timer and resetting the on-timer. Simultaneously, the
clamp on the clock capacitor C2 will be removed and it will start
charging. Thus, the clock is placed back in operation to once again
initiate the search mode for "heavy" plates.
In the event that abnormal conditions exist and the precipitant
weight does not return to "normal" before the on-timer times out, a
logic 0 pulse is produced at the output of the on-timer at the end
of the on-time. This pulse is coupled through gate IC-10 to line C
causing the eight counter to advance one count. Thus, the rapper in
operation will cease and the system will revert to its normal
search mode. Any other "heavy" plates will be rapped until the
abnormal plate is again rapped. In this manner, the system is
prevented from locking on any one set of plates and ignoring the
remaining plates.
The operation and construction of drivers 1 through 8 and their
respective triac switches 1 through 8 is explained in detail in
connection with FIG. 6.
Once any of the NAND gates IC-1 through IC-8 is energized or turned
on, a logical 0 (essentially ground) appears on the base of
transistor Q5 through base resistor R20. Transistor Q5 then shuts
off, and allows the proper gate power to flow into the triac switch
TR-1 through resistor R21 thereby turning the respective rapper set
on.
A suitable rapper is shown and described in the John W. Pennington
U.S. Pat. No. 3,030,753 and our U.S. Pat. No. 3,487,606.
One particular advantage of incorporating the triac switch TR-1 for
energization of the respective rapper set is that the firing angle
of the triac may be varied by a suitable phase controlled circuit.
Accordingly, the rapper intensity may be selectively preset to any
desired value by adjusting the firing angle of the triac TR-1.
Furthermore, it is advantageous to initiate the rapping of any one
rapper set with a preset intensity level and then to thereafter
raise this intensity level up to a maximum. In this manner, the
outermost collected percipitant load will be gently removed in
large amounts thereby preventing the reentrainment and thereafter
the precipitant lying more closely adjacent the electrode is
removed by gradually increasing the intensity level of the rapping
to a maximum. This feature can be accomplished by the use of an
automatic phase control circuit which are well known in the art for
the control of a triac switch. Furthermore, the aforementioned
feature of phase control adjustability by a manual presetting and
the latter mentioned automatic feature may be combined in one unit
to provide an automatic adjustable phase control circuit for the
control of the triac switch TR-1. For reference to such intensity
controls, one should refer, for example, to Chapters 7 and 9 of the
General Electric SCR Manual, 4th Edition; Chapter 8 of
Semiconductor Controlled Rectifiers; Principles and Applications,
by Gentry, Gutzwiller, Hollonyals, and Von Zastrow, Prentice Hall;
and Pages 226 to 261 of the RCA Power Circuits Handbook, 1969. U.
S. Pat. No. 3,525,021, issued to R. G. Engam illustrates another
example.
The foregoing describes the construction and operation of a solid
state electronic control system for the removal of precipitant
collected on the precipitator electrodes wherein load sensors sense
or weigh the collected particle load and energize corresponding
rappers when the particle load exceeds a predetermined limit to
deenergize the same when the particle load magnitude reaches a
predetermined minimum or "normal" condition. The control of the
present invention not only permits the operator to select the mode
of rapping best suited for conditions within the precipitator, but
also initiates rapping only when it is needed and removes only a
predetermined amount in order to optimize the amount of precipitant
on the collecting plates and wires of an electrostatic precipitator
in order to permit it to operate at its greatest efficiency.
Furthermore, the weight sensors are sequentially monitored when a
plurality of them are provided in order to prevent the simultaneous
rapping of more than one rapper set.
Although the invention has been described in its preferred
embodiment and mode of operation as a solid state electronic
device, it is obvious that the principles of the present invention
may be carried out with mechanically equivalent power systems such
as fluid or hydraulic systems. As an example, FIG. 7 illustrates an
alternative embodiment wherein the control is pneumatically
operated. The control here is shown in its simplest form for a
small precipitator unit requiring only one rapper set.
A pneumatic cam valves 101 and 102 respectively, which are part of
the weight sensor 110. The weight sensor 110 further includes the
C-shaped tension spring 103 which has its upper arm anchored as
indicated and its lower arm connected to a precipitator plate in
order to suspend the same.
When the precipitator plate together with its collected precipitant
reaches the "heavy" condition actuator 104 is secured to the bottom
arm of C spring 103 and deflected downwardly in an amount
sufficient to depress contact 105 of the lower limit pneumatic cam
valve 102 to thereby actuate the same and subsequently displace the
pneumatic pilot operated valve 107 such that the air supply
connected thereto is directed to the pneumatic rapper 108 in order
to actuate the same and rap or vibrate the precipitator plate
through the rapper rod 109 which is connected to and suspends the
other end of the precipitator plate.
As the precipitant collected on the precipitator plate is removed
the C spring 103 raises actuator 104 until the "normal" precipitant
load condition is attained at which time actuator 104 will engage
contact 106 of the pneumatic cam valve 101 to activate the same and
whereby displace the pneumatic pilot operated valve 107 in order to
disconnect the air supply to pneumatic rapper 108 to deenergize the
same. At the same time, cam valve 102 is forced to its off
position.
A suitable pneumatic rapper which may be incorporated in the
pneumatic embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in the
J. W. Pennington U. S. Pat. No. 3,030,753.
* * * * *