U.S. patent number 3,741,155 [Application Number 05/065,976] was granted by the patent office on 1973-06-26 for apparatus for particulate coating of an elongate article.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company. Invention is credited to David N. Hunder.
United States Patent |
3,741,155 |
Hunder |
June 26, 1973 |
APPARATUS FOR PARTICULATE COATING OF AN ELONGATE ARTICLE
Abstract
A substantially closed shell contains an air pervious liner
defining an inner chamber for coating an article with
thermoadhesive particles. Air flowing continuously through the
liner toward the article in the chamber prevents buildup of the
thermoadhesive particles on either the top or sides of the chamber.
The chamber may be formed with a pair of openings to permit the
entry and exit of pipe to be coated.
Inventors: |
Hunder; David N. (Woodbury,
MN) |
Assignee: |
Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing
Company (Saint Paul, MN)
|
Family
ID: |
22066445 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/065,976 |
Filed: |
August 21, 1970 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
118/634; 118/326;
118/309; 118/316; 454/51 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B05B
16/60 (20180201); B05B 14/41 (20180201); B05B
14/412 (20180201) |
Current International
Class: |
B05B
15/12 (20060101); B05c 011/16 (); B05b 005/02 ();
B44d 001/0911 () |
Field of
Search: |
;117/17,18,19,21,24,DIG.6,93.4R
;118/50.1,627,628,639,309,312,634,326 ;98/115SB |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Martin; William D.
Assistant Examiner: Sofocleous; M.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. Apparatus for coating an elongate article such as pipe with
thermoadhesive particles comprising a substantially closed outer
shell containing an air pervious liner defining an inner coating
chamber and an outer chamber between the liner and the shell,
openings in the shell for continuous ingress and egress of said
elongate article, means for propelling the particles toward the
article, and an exhaust port for removing from the coating chamber
particles not deposited on the article, wherein the improvement
comprises:
the air pervious liner provides at least the top and sides of the
inner coating chamber and is formed with openings affording
continuous entry and exit of the pipe,
the exhaust port is directly connected to the inner coating chamber
and
means for establishing a pressure differential between the entire
outer chamber and the entire coating chamber so that air flows
continuously through the air pervious liner toward the article,
thereby preventing the deposition of substantial amounts of the
particles on the top and sides of the coating chamber.
2. Apparatus for coating pipe including a substantially closed
outer shell and an air pervious liner defining an inner coating
chamber and an outer chamber between the liner and the shell,
openings in the shell for continuous ingress and egress of pipe,
nozzle means in the inner coating chamber for propelling
thermoadhesive particles toward the pipe and an exhaust port for
removing by vacuum from the inner coating chamber particles not
deposited on the pipe, wherein the improvement comprises:
the air pervious liner provides substantially the entire inner
coating chamber and is formed with openings affording continuous
entry and exit of the pipe,
the exhaust port is directly connected to the inner coating
chamber, and
means establishing a pressure differential between the entire outer
chamber and the entire coating chamber so that air flows
continuously through the air pervious liner toward the pipe,
thereby preventing the deposition of substantial amounts of the
particles on the top and sides of the coating chamber.
3. Apparatus as defined in claim 2, wherein a further improvement
comprises:
the exhaust is located at the bottom of the coating chamber and the
floor of the chamber is slanted downwardly toward the exhaust to
facilitate removal of nondeposited particles.
4. Apparatus as defined in claim 2, wherein a further improvement
comprises:
the air pervious liner has broad semiconductive areas and means are
provided for maintaining a negative charge on the nozzle means and
on the walls at said semiconductive areas.
Description
This invention relates to the coating of elongate articles with
resin particles.
It has been known in the past to coat elongate metal articles,
e.g., pipe, by heating the article to be coated and passing it into
a chamber containing air-suspended resin particles maintained below
their melt temperature. When the particles come in contact with the
pipe, which is maintained at a temperature higher than the melt
temperature of the resin, they melt and fuse on the pipe surface to
form a coating. The nonadherent excess particles are then removed
by vacuum.
While fusing is necessary to adherently coat the article, the
fusing operation can take place in an oven after the resin
particles have been deposited on the article. Coating, when
external fusing is used, is usually done by placing an
electrostatic charge on the particles immediately before they come
in contact with the metal article which is grounded.
A further variant used, and indeed preferred, is to coat the
articles by using both electrostatic forces and fusing
simultaneously in the coating chamber.
Because these finely divided particles provide an explosive danger
if allowed to disperse about the building where the coating is
performed, coating systems such as that disclosed in U. S. Pat. No.
3,361,111, have been devised which provide a means for preventing
escape of the particles from the chamber. The coating process
disclosed in the above-mentioned patent is designed to be
essentially continuous, and the retrieved particles, after removal
from the chamber by vacuum, are recirculated to be used again.
One of the difficulties encountered in all of these particulate
coating processes, however, is that the powder used for coating
tends to adhere to the chamber surfaces with which it comes in
contact. This powder is not successfully removed by vacuum means
used to withdraw the uncoated particles. The powder clinging to the
sides and top of the chamber tends to fall off and land upon the
workpiece producing localized, irregularly surfaced coating areas.
While the problem of powder adherence to the sides and top of the
coating chamber is a troublesome one for all coating processes of
this type, it is particularly annoying for the continuous
operations. Periodically, these operations must be shut down and
the particles removed from the surfaces of the chamber.
It has now been found that the coating of an article such as a hot
metal pipe by a resin powder may be performed without the
deposition of substantial amounts of powder on the top or sides of
the chamber. This is accomplished by establishing a differential
pressure across an air pervious liner which forms the coating
chamber. With the pressure on the outside surface of the liner
greater than that on the inside surface, particles are maintained
about the article to be coated and away from the top and sides of
the coating chamber.
The construction of the device may readily be understood by
reference to the drawings in which:
FIG. 1 is a cross sectional view of one embodiment of the coating
apparatus,
FIG. 2 is a longitudinal cross sectional view of the apparatus
depicted in FIG. 1.
The substantially closed shell 10 in combination with the air
pervious liner 11 and support struts 12 forms an outer chamber 21
consisting of a series of compartments. (It should be noted that
the support struts may be air pervious or otherwise allow the
passage of air. When this is the case, a single outer compartment
rather than a series of outer compartments is formed with no
evident effect on the performance of the apparatus.) A
substantially closed inner or coating chamber 22 is defined by the
liner 11. The hot pipe 17 enters the chamber 22 through the
workpiece entry 16 and is kept in alignment by externally located
rollers 20. Thermoadhesive powder is propelled by air through the
particle inlets 14 and passes through the nozzles 15 which may be
used to electrically charge the particles by equipment not shown.
Air enters through a plurality of air inlets 13 and passes through
and is diffused by inner liner 11. Particles which have not adhered
to the pipe are removed through exhaust port 18.
After the hot pipe is introduced into the chamber it is bombarded
with the thermoadhesive particles. When air is introduced through
the air inlets, a pressure differential is created between the
outer chamber and the coating chamber which causes air to flow
toward the pipe continuously from all sides. The air flow prevents
buildup on the walls and ceiling of the coating chamber. Particles
which do not coat the pipe fall to the chamber floor or are removed
through the exhaust port.
As seen in FIG. 1 of the drawing, the floor of the chamber is
slanted toward the exhaust port 18. This aids somewhat in particle
removal although it is not a necessity. Since the small amount of
particles present on the floor of the chamber do not detract from
the coating process, they may be allowed to remain till they can be
conveniently removed. It may be desirable to include gentle
agitation means attached to the floor of the coating chamber,
particularly if a slanted floor is used, to impel the particles
toward the exhaust port.
While the teachings of this invention are particularly useful in
continuous coating processes of the type illustrated in U. S. Pat.
Nos. 3,361,111 and 3,161,530, and the improvements described in
this application are particularly adaptable for use therewith, the
teachings of this invention are not so limited. It is readily
apparent that apparatus without particle recycling means can be
used.
A further variant contemplated is the use of a semiconductive air
pervious layer coated with electrostatically charged semiconductive
particles. When the resin particles come under the influence of the
electrostatic field created between the charged liner and the
grounded pipe, the likelihood of particle attraction to the pipe is
increased.
COMPARATIVE TEST
This test provides an illustration of the effect of the air
pervious liner on particle adherence to chamber walls. While, in
this example, 3/16-inch thick Fluidizing Grade "Vyon" porous
polyethylene sheet material was used as the air pervious member, it
should be readily apparent that any air pervious substance may be
substituted for the polyethylene including such diverse materials
as metal screening and kraft paper. It is preferred, however, that
the openings in the liner be smaller than the thermoplastic
particles.
For this test a small rectangular coating chamber was made with a
single air inlet at its top face. A sheet of porous polyethylene
was attached to one of the vertical walls of the chamber and to a
centrally located support strut depending from the ceiling. A metal
plate was attached to the opposite vertical wall and to the
supporting strut. The polyethylene sheet and metal together
produced a coating chamber with a false ceiling which was parallel
to, but lower than the ceiling of the original chamber. Half of
this new ceiling was air pervious while the other half was not.
A charging electrode was attached to the particle spray nozzle and
a 90,000 volt potential was applied to the nozzle to
electrostatically charge the thermoadhesive particles.
Over a period of four hours, one hundred pounds of powder epoxy
particles described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,102,043 was
electrostatically sprayed into the chamber toward the grounded
pipe. An air flow of 4 standard cubic feet per minute per sq. ft.
of surface area as measured in the air inlet was used to create
positive pressure along the inside of the air pervious part of the
new ceiling.
After spraying was complete the ceiling was inspected for signs of
powder buildup. It was found that while the metal half of the
ceiling was covered with a thick powder coat, the air pervious half
was completely devoid of powder.
EXAMPLE 1
The apparatus illustrated in the drawings was used for this
example. The shell was a cube of 28 inches per side (excluding the
exhaust port extension at the floor). The length of the floor
including the exhaust port was 32 inches, and the chamber opening
for the exhaust port was 4 inches in width. The porous polyethylene
liner was mounted at a constant distance of 2 inches from the
outside shell except for the chamber floor. (One end of the chamber
floor was attached to the shell at the exhaust port and the other
end was attached to the strut 2 inches from the bottom of the shell
as illustrated in FIG. 1.)
An air flow of 4 standard cubic feet per minute per square foot of
surface area as measured at the air inlet was used to provide the
outer chamber with a higher pressure than the coating chamber. The
vacuum drawn at the exhaust port was 1,000 cu. ft./min.
After coating was completed, an examination of the interior
revealed that the top and sides of the liner were completely clear
of powder except for minor amounts which had collected in the area
of the struts. Some powder was found in a thin layer on the slanted
floor of the chamber but a slight vibration of the floor caused the
powder to move toward the collection port and be removed by the
vacuum means attached thereto. The coating on the pipe was firmly
adherent and uniform along the entire surface.
EXAMPLE 2
The apparatus used in Example 1 was used in this example except
that the polyethylene liner was coated to a wet thickness of 1 to 2
mils "Aquadag," a colloidal suspension of graphite particles in
water containing 22 percent graphite solids. The graphite was
uniformly applied over approximately 80 percent of the surface area
of the inner chamber. The areas around the metal support struts
were left uncoated to prevent shorting out. Using the air flow
indicated in Example 1, three identical segments of pipe were
cold-coated as follows. The first pipe was coated with a negative
charge at the particle intake nozzle, the second with a negative
charge on the graphite and the third with a negative charge on both
the graphite and the nozzle. After coating the pipes were heated in
an oven to fuse the resin. Coating thickness was measured after the
pipes were allowed to cool. It was found that the first two pipes
had a well-adhered, uniform coating of 4 mils, while the pipe
coated with charges on both the graphite and the nozzle produced a
well-adhered, uniform coating of between 5 and 6 mils.
It should be noted that a positive charge can be used on the nozzle
and/or the coated liner. The choice of charge is to some extent
dependent on the particular resin chosen, e.g., the epoxy resins
accept a negative charge more easily than a positive one.
* * * * *