U.S. patent number 3,730,678 [Application Number 05/084,572] was granted by the patent office on 1973-05-01 for process for treating textile materials.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Burlington Industries, Inc.. Invention is credited to Kenneth Y. Wang, Frederick C. Wedler.
United States Patent |
3,730,678 |
Wedler , et al. |
May 1, 1973 |
**Please see images for:
( Certificate of Correction ) ** |
PROCESS FOR TREATING TEXTILE MATERIALS
Abstract
A process and apparatus are described for impregnating a textile
having relatively fine openings therein with a treating liquid
whereby penetration and pick-up of the liquid are improved by
relatively strong vacuum degassing the textile immediately before
impregnation.
Inventors: |
Wedler; Frederick C.
(Greensboro, NC), Wang; Kenneth Y. (Greensboro, NC) |
Assignee: |
Burlington Industries, Inc.
(Greensboro, NC)
|
Family
ID: |
27374803 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/084,572 |
Filed: |
October 28, 1970 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
665894 |
Sep 6, 1967 |
|
|
|
|
746972 |
Jul 23, 1968 |
|
|
|
|
665894 |
Sep 6, 1967 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
8/149.1; 8/149.2;
8/149.3 |
Current CPC
Class: |
D06B
23/16 (20130101); B29B 15/122 (20130101); D06B
21/00 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
D06B
23/00 (20060101); D06B 21/00 (20060101); D06B
23/16 (20060101); B29B 15/10 (20060101); B29B
15/12 (20060101); B05c 011/115 () |
Field of
Search: |
;34/92,242
;68/20,5D,5E,22B ;118/49,50 ;8/149.1,149.2,149.3,151 ;117/119 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
649,592 |
|
Nov 1962 |
|
IT |
|
964,379 |
|
Jul 1964 |
|
GB |
|
277,525 |
|
Nov 1964 |
|
NL |
|
Primary Examiner: Price; William T.
Parent Case Text
This application is a continuation-in-part of copending application
Ser. No. 665,894, filed Sept. 6, 1967, now abandoned, and also of
co-pending application Ser. No. 746,972, filed July 23, 1968, the
latter application being a continuation-in-part of the former.
Claims
Having described the invention, what we claim as new is:
1. In a process for impregnating a textile material in the form of
a sheet or web having relatively fine openings therein, the
improvement which comprises: subjecting the textile material to a
relatively strong vacuum in a first chamber in order to degas the
textile material; then passing the textile material from the first
chamber into a second chamber containing a relatively low viscosity
impregnating liquid whereby said textile material is thoroughly
impregnated with said liquid; said textile material passing between
said chambers while the two chambers are effectively maintained out
of fluid communication with each other; and wherein textile piece
goods are used as the textile material, such textile piece goods
being of a fine weave, as could be used for suitings or shirtings,
and comprising separate lengths or sections of material with joints
or seams between adjacent sections joining a plurality of sections
into a larger continuous length; and wherein the textile material
is of indefinite length for continuous passage and movement
serially through the first and second chambers; the first chamber
having sealing means at the entrance and exit ends thereof for
passage therethrough of the textile material without loss of the
vacuum within said first chamber, and the sealing means at the exit
end of the first chamber constituting the inlet into said second
chamber, said latter sealing means also carrying, at least in part,
the impregnating liquid so that, as the textile material passes
therethrough, it passes directly and immediately into the
impregnating liquid; and wherein the second chamber is rendered
fluidtight and is placed under superatmospheric pressure so that
the impregnating liquid therein is pressurized; and further wherein
the textile material is not subjected to said impregnating liquid
until after it passes through the first chamber.
2. The process defined in claim 1 wherein sealing means are
provided at the exit end of the second chamber and further wherein
the textile material is fed continuously through said inlet and
exit ends of said second chamber and through the pressurized
impregnating liquid therein without loss of vacuum in the first
chamber and without loss of pressure in the second chamber.
3. The process defined in claim 2 wherein said second chamber also
includes a treating gas therein and wherein the textile material is
passed first through the impregnating liquid in the second chamber
and then through the treating gas therein before exiting from that
chamber.
4. The process defined in claim 3 wherein the treating gas is
steam.
Description
The present invention is concerned with the treatment of textile
materials with liquids.
In the textile industry, impregnation of a sheet-like or web-like
textile material (e.g. a woven, nonwoven or knitted fabric) with
treating liquid is often performed by repeated dipping and
squeezing. For liquid of low viscosity and fabric or other material
of relatively open structure, it is comparatively easy to achieve
good impregnation. However when textile materials having relatively
fine openings therein are involved, such as a tightly woven fabric,
impregnation into the textile structure becomes increasingly
difficult as the liquid must be forced into spaces between adjacent
fibers or filaments which are occupied by air molecules. Previously
proposed techniques usually involve dipping the textile into a
vessel containing the liquid and then squeezing it between two
pressurized rubber rollers. This process is repeated as many times
as necessary to achieve the desired impregnation.
The principal object of the present invention is to provide a
process which greatly improves the impregnation of textile
materials having relatively fine openings therein with liquids.
Other objects and advantages will be hereinafter apparent.
Broadly stated, the present process comprises degassing the textile
by means of a relatively strong vacuum, i.e. removing the gases and
vapors entrapped therein, just before the textile is subjected to
liquid treatment. According to the invention, the desired degassing
is accomplished by passing the textile through a chamber having a
strong vacuum therein. When the thus processed textile is then
contacted with the treating liquid, there is a pressure gradient
between the liquid and the textile whereby the liquid, for all
intents and purposes, is forced into the void spaces in the textile
created by the vacuum treatment. Whatever the actual mechanism may
be, however, it is apparent that application of the strong vacuum
to the textile immediately prior to the impregnation with liquid
brings about a much more effective impregnation than would
otherwise be possible without using a strong vacuum for degassing
the textile.
The invention is particularly valuable when "textile piece goods"
are used as the textile material being impregnated in a continuous
process. Textile piece goods have fine openings or interstices
therein, as could be used, for example, for suitings and shirtings,
as is understood in the art. Such textile piece goods ordinarily
come in relatively short lengths (for example, in the order of
normally 60 - 150 yards each) and have joints therein between
adjacent sections (which joints commonly extend transversely of the
length of the textile piece goods), joining a plurality of pieces
or sections into a larger continuous length for further processing,
such as dyeing or finishing. The invention is also particularly
valuable when relatively low viscosity liquids are utilized as the
impregnating liquid for such textile piece goods.
The invention is described in more detail by reference to the
accompanying drawings wherein:
FIGS. 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 illustrate schematically various different
exemplary forms of apparatus for practicing the invention.
FIG. 4 is a fragmentary and enlarged perspective view of exemplary
means for adjustment of sealing rollers for use herein, as will
become apparent.
Referring now to the drawings wherein like or corresponding parts
have been given the same or similar reference numerals, the
apparatus shown in FIG. 1 comprises a rigid box member 2 which
serves to define the degassing zone or vacuum chamber 4. Member 2
may be constructed of stainless steel or other metal as will be
understood by those in the art.
Member 2 is provided with a first opening 6 and second opening 8
constituting the entrance opening and exit opening, respectively,
for the web or sheet of textile material 10 moving in the direction
shown by the arrows. As indicated above, the textile 10 has
relatively fine openings therein and is of the type of textile
where air spaces may occur between adjacent fibers or filaments and
impregnation is normally effected with difficulty. Such textiles
include, for example, woven or knitted fabrics, nonwovens and
tufted nonwovens. So-called textile piece goods, as referred to
above, are characteristic of a preferred type of known textile web
or sheet with which the present invention is particularly useful.
As typical examples of materials which may be advantageously
treated by the present process, there may be mentioned any knit,
woven or nonwoven construction comprising natural and/or synthetic
fibers, e.g. wool, cotton, glass, polyester, acrylic, rayon,
etc.
Suitable sealing means for maintaining the vacuum within the
chamber 4, while permitting entrance and exit of the textile
therefrom, must also be provided for present purposes. These
sealing means may take a variety of forms but a particularly
preferred embodiment herein, as shown in FIG. 1, involves the use
of pairs of entrance and exit rubber sealing rollers 12 and 14
respectively, mounted adjacent the entrance and exit ends of
chamber 4 and cooperative with plate members 16. The latter members
16, in one exemplary form, are steel-backed, Teflon-coated rubber
flaps used as a sliding seal for the pairs of rubber rollers 12 and
14.
These pairs of rollers 12 and 14 serve to guide the movement of the
textile in and out of the chamber 4 while effectively maintaining
the vacuum in the chamber. Resilient seal rollers of this type are
well known in the art and any available design thereof may be used
for present purposes. See also, U. S. Pat. Nos. 3,137,151 and
3,213,470 disclosing seals suitable for use herein.
The seal rollers 12 and 14 are rotated simultaneously at the same
surface speed in the direction of the arrows so as to draw the
textile 10 through chamber 4. This may be accomplished by
appropriate motor means 17 which function to drive one each of the
pairs of rollers 12 and 14 through a suitable driving chain
arrangement 18, as indicated, each of the other rollers 12 and 14
being rotated by contact with its chain-driven mate. The speed of
rollers 12 and 14 is regulated to subject the textile to degassing
for the desired length of time. It will be recognized that the time
the textile spends in the degassing or vacuum chamber can be widely
varied and will depend on other operating conditions, e.g. the
nature of the fabric involved. Typical exposure times may range
from about 1 - 15 seconds, for example, 2 - 5 seconds, although
times outside this range may also be effectively used.
Advantageously, conventional means (not shown) are provided for
heating the chamber 4, e.g. infrared, dielectric, radiant and other
types of heaters, so as to increase the temperature of the textile
and thus improve the efficiency of the degassing treatment.
The chamber 4 may be evacuated to the desired degree of vacuum by
means of a conventional high capacity vacuum pump or the like (not
shown) through an appropriate takeoff conduit 19. The vacuum in
chamber 4 is advantageously high or strong, for example, in the
range of 80 - 98 percent of a complete or perfect vacuum, that is,
about 0.6 - 6 inches of mercury, absolute pressure. In an exemplary
and preferred embodiment the vacuum in chamber 4 is at least 80
percent of a complete or perfect vacuum and could go as high as 95
percent or higher.
In the embodiment of FIG. 1, the top nip of the exit seal rollers
14 is filled with treating liquid 20 so that immmediately after
being degassed in chamber 4, the textile is drawn through the
rollers 14 and the liquid 20. The textile is shown as thereafter
passing through a set of conventional padder rollers 22 or an
extractor or any other suitable means, if needed, to remove any
excess liquid from the textile, and then over guide roll 24 to any
desired subsequent treatment, as will be understood. One of the
padder rollers 22 is shown as being driven by means of motor 17 and
the chain means 18.
The apparatus of FIG. 2 is identical to that shown in FIG. 1 except
that, in FIG. 2, the upper portion of the box member 2 is extended
to provide a larger box-like liquid treating zone or tank 26 which
may contain as much treating liquid 28 as desired. This arrangement
makes it possible to provide as long a passage of the fabric
through the treating liquid as may be desirable or necessary and
has the advantage of permitting the use of greater volumes of
treating liquid than possible where the liquid is in the nip of the
top seal rollers as in FIG. 1.
In the system of FIG. 3, the rotating seal rollers 12 and 14 of
FIG. 2 have been replaced by fixed or non-rotating pairs of seals
29 and 30. These may comprise, as shown, cooperating elastic or
flexible sealing members which are sufficiently flexible to permit
passage of the fabric 10 therethrough while maintaining the desired
vacuum condition in chamber 4. The seals 29, 30 are shown as being
of the inflated seal type, in pressure contact with the fabric or
textile as it passes therethrough, thus inhibiting passage of
atmosphere or liquid from tank 26 into the chamber 4.
FIG. 4 diagrammatically shows one arrangement for maintaining the
desired sealing contact between each set or pair of sealing rollers
12 and 14 in the FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 embodiments. The arrangement, as
applied to the top sealing rollers 14a and 14b is shown as
comprising a hand crank 32 or the equivalent, and shaft 33
rotatable therewith as indicated, to operate a spring loaded cam
arrangement, broadly identified by the numeral 34, for the purpose
of sliding the movable roller 14a on bar members 36 towards the
other roller 14b, the latter being held in a fixed position, to
provide the desired seal while permitting passage of the fabric
through the rollers. Similar adjusting means may also be provided
at the other end of the rollers (now shown). It will be appreciated
that other means for maintaining the rollers in the desired sealing
contact, e.g. air pressure, may also be used.
The degassing effect on the textile and the fibers and/or filaments
therein, when exposed to the high vacuum condition in chamber 4 has
been found to result in removal of substantially all gaseous or
atmospheric impedance to thorough and immediate wetting or
impregnation of the textile. Under conditions of vacuum and
temperature combinations within the vacuum chamber 4, entrapped or
residual or uneven moisture content has been found to be readily
removed.
It has been found further that the pressure differential existing
between the vacuum chamber 4 and the chamber containing the
impregnating or treatment liquor, exerts a substantial influence on
the successful and effective impregnation realized by the subject
process.
In the process of the invention, when the textile 10 emerges from
the vacuum chamber 4 into direct contact with the treatment liquid
at atmospheric pressure, in the FIGS. 1-3 embodiments, the pressure
differential is substantial because of the extremely high vacuum
conditions within the vacuum chamber. As indicated, this pressure
differential has been found to be most effective in bringing about
thorough and complete impregnation of the textile. This pressure
differential may be still further increased and made more
effective, if desired for certain applications, by means of the
embodiment of the invention shown in FIG. 5. In this embodiment,
the treating or impregnation chamber 26' is made fluid-tight for
pressurizing. For this purpose, a pair of rotating, pressure,
rubber sealing rollers 50 are arranged at the exit side of the
treatment chamber 26' and in suitable sealing contact with
structure at the upper end of the walls thereof, whereby the entire
chamber within tank 26' is fluid-tight or hermetically sealed.
In the FIG. 5 embodiment, it will be noted that the seals 29', 30'
at the entrance and exit ends respectively, of the vacuum chamber
4' are shown as being of the inflated seal type. It will be
understood, however, that rotating seal rollers (or other
equivalent structures) may be utilized in lieu thereof, if desired,
and of the type shown in FIGS. 1 and 2. The textile material 10' is
shown as passing over a plurality of rollers 52 within the vacuum
chamber and suitable heating means may be provided to raise the
temperature of the vacuum chamber, if desired.
When the textile leaves the vacuum chamber 4', it passes
immediately into contact with the impregnating liquid in the
treatment chamber or tank 26', as shown, after which it passes
around the roller 54 and up through the liquid and to be discharged
through the exit sealing rollers 50.
In the embodiment of FIG. 5, the vacuum chamber is capable of
having a vacuum of from about 0.6 to 6 inches of mercury, absolute
pressure, provided therein. The pressure within the treatment
chamber or tank 26' is superatmospheric and, for example, in the
range of up to about 40-50 p.s.i. Tank 26' may be pressurized in
any suitable manner, as by the introduction of fluid under pressure
through conduit 56 opening thereinto and communicating with a
source of fluid at the desired pressure.
Thus, it will be seen that when using the same high vacuum for the
vacuum chamber 4' in FIG. 5, as previously noted herein, the
pressure differential between the treating chamber 26' and the
vacuum chamber 4' in FIG. 5 will be considerably greater than in
the FIGS. 1-3 embodiments, thereby increasing and maximizing the
effect of pressure differential in the impregnation step.
The FIG. 5 embodiment does provide a system whereby impregnation
liquors may be applied at reduced or elevated temperatures, as may
be advantageous in certain applications. Furthermore, it provides a
system wherein the impregnation liquors may be applied in a fully
closed system, thus avoiding the escape of fumes or gases into the
atmosphere. As the overpressure in the treatment chamber 26' in
FIG. 5 may be effected by suitable injection or introduction into
that chamber of steam, inert gases, or other suitable fluid, this
system may be effectively applied where oxygen or other atmospheric
gases are sought to be eliminated from the impregnation stage of
the process.
FIG. 6 shows a still further embodiment of the invention wherein
the treating liquid chamber 26" is pressurized as in the case of
the FIG. 5 embodiment. In this case, however, provision is made for
the further treatment of the textile with a treating gas, under
pressure, after the textile has passed through the impregnating
liquid. As shown, the textile first passes through the vacuum
chamber 4", through the entrance 29" and exit 30" seals therein and
then through the impregnating or treatment liquid 28" which is
under superatmospheric pressure, for example, up to about 40-50
p.s.i., as in the case of the FIG. 5 embodiment. The textile 10"
then passes from the impregnating liquid 28" into the larger
chamber 59 in fluid-tight tank 60 with which it is in open
communication. A pair of squeezing nip rollers 22" is shown above
the impregnating liquid in tank 60 for the passage therethrough of
the textile. A plurality of cloth carrying rolls 62 is shown
arranged in tank 60 for directing the passage of the textile
through chamber 59, as indicated, the textile exiting through
sealing means 50', shown to be of the inflated type.
The chamber 59 may be pressurized through the injection thereinto
of steam or suitable reactant vapor or air, for example, through
conventionally valved inlet ducts indicated by reference numeral
64.
An inlet 66 is shown opening into the jacketed vessel or tank 26"
for the introduction of treatment or impregnating liquid thereinto
and with suitable valving (not shown) provided in that line. The
jacketing of the tank 26" will control the temperature of the
treatment bath, as will be evident.
Line 19" is shown communicating with the vacuum chamber 4" for
producing the desired strong vacuum therein, of the same order of
magnitude noted above.
The entrance 29" and exit 30" seals for the vacuum chamber 4" are
shown as being of the inflated seal type but they may also be of
the rotating seal type, if desired, as in the FIGS. 1 and 2
embodiments, or other equivalent sealing structures may be utilized
therefor.
The pressurized reaction chamber 59 may be provided with suitable
jacketing or insulation (not shown) for temperature control and it
will be seen that the vacuum chamber 4" and liquid containing
chamber 26" are formed therewithin, providing a simplified and
compact unitary construction.
A liquid chemical reaction bath 68 is shown in a tank 70 in the
reaction chamber 59, disposed so as to permit the passage of the
textile therethrough for additional processing of the textile, as
will be evident. The textile will make two passes through that bath
68 in the manner shown, it being evident that the number of passes
therethrough may be changed as desired.
Thus, it will be seen that the embodiment of FIG. 6 retains all of
the advantages of the FIG. 5 embodiment and includes the additional
advantages of providing a substantially enlarged pressure reaction
chamber in which more complex reactions might be carried out and
completed, as desired, as through the use of gaseous materials
introduced into chamber 59. Furthermore, it provides the option of
a still further liquid reactant application, in bath 68, within the
system.
The process described herein may be used for any type of liquid
treatment where good penetration or impregnation into the textile
is normally difficult to obtain. Thus, for example, the process may
be employed for dyeing, resin treating, mercerizing, scouring and
the like, wherein a relatively low viscosity treating or
impregnating liquid is utilized. Representative operations, which
are given only for the purpose of illustration, are described in
the following examples, wherein percentages are by weight.
Example 1
A tight weave cotton/nylon raincoat fabric was threaded up in the
manner shown in FIG. 1. The fabric was subjected to vacuum
degassing in chamber 4 at ambient temperature and at about 4 inches
of mercury (absolute pressure) for about 2 seconds. The treating
liquid 20 on the top nip of the exit sealer rollers 14 was a
solution of direct dyestuff in water (Sky blue FF, 0.5 grams per
liter of water). The fabric was passed from the degassing chamber
through the dyebath 20 and the padder rollers 22 and a wet sample
was then cut off and immediately weighed. A control sample was
treated in the same manner except the application of the vacuum was
omitted. The two samples were then dried so as to be in equilibrium
with atmospheric conditions and reweighed. The advantage of dyeing
by vacuum degassed impregnation was shown by the following:
Control Vacuum Degassed Sample Sample Weight of fabric wet 64.8
gms. 76.3 gms. Weight of fabric dried 49.0 gms. 46.1 gms. Weight of
water 15.8 gms. 30.2 gms. % pick up 32.2% 65.5%
As will be apparent, the process with vacuum decreasing increased
the wet pick up by more than 100 percent and the vacuum degassed
sample was dyed to a much darker blue as shown by
spectrophotometric measurements, the shade being 112 percent
stronger with vacuum degassing than without.
Example 2
Example 1 was repeated except that the dyestuff was a dispersed
dye, the dyebath including the following:
1 percent Cellathrene Brilliant Blue FFS (Color Index No.
61505)
0.1 percent Blancol N (Anionic dispersing agent)
20 percent Keltex (2 percent aqueous solution of sodium
alginate)
As in Example 1, two samples were prepared, one with vacuum
degassing and one without. The two samples were dried at
150.degree.F., thermosolled for 2 minutes at 370.degree.F on a pin
frame and then subjected to treatment for 15 minutes at
160.degree.F in an aqueous stripping solution containing the
following:
sodium hydroxide 1 gram per liter sodium hydrosulfite 2 grams per
liter Aerosol OT (detergent) 1 gram per liter
The samples were then rinsed and steam pressed. The vacuum sample
was much darker blue (i.e. about 28 percent stronger) than the
sample which had not been vacuumed.
Example 3
Example 2 was repeated except that, instead of treating the samples
in stripping solution, they were washed in an aqueous solution
containing 0.5 percent sodium carbonate and 0.1 percent Aerosol OT.
The samples were washed for 5 minutes at 140.degree.F in this
solution, rinsed and steam pressed. The vacuumed sample
demonstrated a much better shade than the non-vacuumed sample.
Example 4
a. A piece of heavy weight textured fiberglass fabric was treated
as in Example 1 using the system shown in FIG. 1 except that the
liquid 20 was a resin mixture (A) of the following composition:
0.2 percent gamma glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane coupling
agent
0.5 percent ammonium hydroxide
8 percent acrylic resin Polycryl 7Fl-polymer
1 percent Emery fatty type softener (7777-softener )
2 percent epoxy resin (Moretex 7020 )
2 percent Ciba Blue BCT (Color Index No. 74160/74250)
b. Another piece of the same fabric was similarly treated using the
following resin mixture (B) as the treating liquid:
0.2 percent glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane coupling agent
1 percent Emery fatty type softener
8 percent acrylic resin
2 percent epoxy resin
2 percent Reservol CT sol
2 percent Ciba Blue BCT (Color Index No. 74160/74250)
The epoxy, acrylic resin and softener used in Example 4 b were the
same as those used in Example 4 a.
After passing through the padder rollers 22, the fabric in 4 a and
4b was oven dried for 3 minutes at 400.degree.F. The resulting
products demonstrated significantly better penetration and
appearance when compared with otherwise similarly processed
products where the vacuum degassing step was omitted.
Quantitatively, the vacuum degassing increased the resin pick up by
7.3 percent and 4 percent, by weight for resin mixtures (A) and
(B), respectively.
Essentially similar advantages are shown when other types of
fabric, e.g. a tight weave cotton, are resin treated as described
in lieu of the fiberglass fabric used herein.
It will be appreciated that various modifications may be made in
the invention as described above. For example, the padder rollers
22 may be replaced by a high expression pad to reduce the water or
liquid content of the goods to the desired level, e.g. to about 50
percent after which the fabric is passed through another vacuum
chamber (not shown) or perhaps back through the same vacuum chamber
so as to complete the drying by vacuum.
While the vacuum or degassing treatment is shown at ambient
temperature in the foregoing examples, even better results can be
operated by heating the textile material while it is in the vacuum
chamber, as noted above. Heating improves the efficiency of the
degassing and the resulting textile has even greater imbibitive
properties. Elevated temperatures of the order of, for example,
35.degree. - 100.degree.C., may advantageously be employed for the
degassing operation.
* * * * *