U.S. patent number 3,730,094 [Application Number 05/045,743] was granted by the patent office on 1973-05-01 for energetic protective coating for caseless ammunition.
Invention is credited to Joseph B. Quinlan.
United States Patent |
3,730,094 |
Quinlan |
May 1, 1973 |
ENERGETIC PROTECTIVE COATING FOR CASELESS AMMUNITION
Abstract
Caseless ammunition comprising propellant components provided
with an energetic thermal and moisture-resistant coating are
characterized by good environmental protection. The employment of a
high temperature resistant explosive as a component of the coating
permits the application of relatively thick coatings to obtain the
advantage of increased thermal resistance without a consumability
accommodation in the ballistic cycle.
Inventors: |
Quinlan; Joseph B.
(Philadelphia, PA) |
Family
ID: |
21939632 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/045,743 |
Filed: |
June 12, 1970 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
102/431;
102/700 |
Current CPC
Class: |
F42B
5/196 (20130101); Y10S 102/70 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
F42B
5/196 (20060101); F42B 5/00 (20060101); F42b
005/18 () |
Field of
Search: |
;102/38,DIG.1,43,39
;149/2 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Stahl; Robert F.
Claims
I claim:
1. In a caseless round of ammunition having a molded propellant
charge of nitrocellulose granules and a projectile adhesively
secured within a forward portion thereof, said molded propellant
charge having a rearwardly opening recess in a rearward end
thereof,
a primer secured in said rearwardly opening recess,
said molded propellant charge, its rearwardly opening recess, and
said primer having their surfaces completely covered with a high
temperature resistant protective coating, said coating comprising a
cyclic nitro-organic high temperature resistant explosive and an
organic binder, wherein said explosive is selected from the group
consisting of RDX and HMX.
2. The structure of claim 1 wherein said explosive is RDX.
3. The structure of claim 1 wherein said explosive is HMX.
Description
The invention described herein may be manufactured, used, and
licensed by or for the Government for governmental purposes without
the payment to me of any royalty thereon.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a protective coating for caseless
ammunition and particularly, to a thermal- and moisture-resistant
coating for caseless ammunition which provides good environmental
protection. More particularly, the invention relates to caseless
ammunition components provided with energetic environmental
protective coatings.
2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART
Caseless ammunition, i.e., ammunition having a consumable or
combustible cartridge case is well known and the advantages thereof
vis-a-vis cased rounds are discussed at length in the prior art,
e.g., U. S. Pat. No. 2,982,211 (Beal et al.), issued May 2, 1961
and U. S. Pat. No. 3,212,440 (Quinlan et al.) issued Oct. 19, 1965.
In general these advantages comprise a considerable saving in
ammunition weight, obviation of the case disposal problem,
increased weapon firing rate potential and weapon weight
attributable to elimination of the ejection operation and
mechanism, and elimination of the need for expensive cartridge case
metals and metal forming operations as well as the need for
stockpiling such metals to avoid critical shortages.
The concept of a caseless cartridge is not of recent vintage, as
evidenced by the disclosure of British Pat. No. 7193 A.D. 1891. The
British specification sets forth the generally accepted criteria
that a caseless cartridge consist essentially of a cartridge body
or rigid charge formed of any suitable explosive substance and that
such body or charge be completely consumable and constitute either
the whole or a part of the propulsive charge.
Since the original concept, improvements in the design and
fabrication of caseless ammunition have been the subject of
numerous patents. For example, Beal et al., infra, disclose
caseless cartridges providing means for the appropriate attachment
of projectiles and primer caps and possessing mass burning rate and
ballistic characteristics comparable to those possessed by metal
cased rounds of similar caliber and propellant.
While progress in the development and improvement of caseless
ammunition is borne out by the aforementioned discussion, a
particularly vexing problem has attended the use of such ammunition
from the outset and has continued to plague investigators in their
attempts to provide a solution therefor. This problem relates to
environmental protection for caseless ammunition and is basically
concerned with imparting thermal and moisture resistance to
caseless cartridges. While recognition of the problem is not
original, prior art attempts have not been wholly satisfactory. In
the main, they have provided only partial environmental protection
while concomitantly compromising the ballistic performance
characteristics of the caseless cartridges. In this regard, the
British specification, infra, discloses coating the exterior
surface of a caseless cartridge with an incombustible material,
such as paraffin or asbestos cloth, to improve thermal resistance
and, accordingly, necessarily effects thereby an accommodation in
the ballistic cycle. Beal et al, infra, suggest the application of
a protective coating to a laminated combustible cartridge case for
the purpose of waterproofing or, in some instances, as a means of
controlling or retarding the burning rate of the combustible case,
although lacking in a teaching of a specific coating composition
that will accomplish the desired results. Quinlan et al, infra,
teach the application of a thin coating, not more than 0.002 inch
thick, of a suitable material to the outer surfaces of propellant
to reduce heat conductivity from the weapon chamber to the round
and thus reduce the danger of cook-off. Suggested coating materials
by Quinlan et al. include 80 percent by weight of methyl
methacrylate and the balance molybdenum disulfide or graphite. As
the Quinlan et al. coatings are necessarily restricted to
relatively thin dimensions in order to insure adequate
combustibility and ballistic performance, the degree of thermal
resistance afforded by such coatings is minimal, and consequently,
constitutes an unduly limiting design factor.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is concerned with an energetic coating
composition for providing caseless ammunition components with
environmental protection, said composition consisting essentially
of a high temperature resistant explosive.
The invention also contemplates a liquid coating mixture for
application to caseless ammunition components to provide
environmental protective coatings therefor, said mixture consisting
essentially of a suspension in an organic medium of an energetic
composition consisting essentially of a high temperature resistant
explosive.
The invention is further directed to a process for providing
caseless ammunition components with environmental protection
comprising applying a liquid coating mixture to said components to
provide a wet coating thereon, said mixture consisting essentially
of a suspension in an organic medium of an energetic composition
consisting essentially of a high temperature resistant explosive,
evaporating said organic medium from said wet coating to obtain a
dry coating, and repeating said mixture applying and organic medium
evaporating steps until a desired coating thickness is
obtained.
The invention is also directed to a process for providing a
caseless round with environmental protection comprising applying a
liquid coating mixture to the individual components thereof to
provide wet coatings thereon, said mixture consisting essentially
of a suspension in an organic medium of an energetic composition
consisting essentially of a high temperature resistant explosive,
evaporating said organic medium from said wet coatings to obtain
dry coatings, repeating said mixture applying and evaporating steps
until a desired coating thickness is obtained, assembling said
individual components to form said caseless round, and repeating
said mixture applying and evaporating steps with respect to the
assembled round.
The invention also relates to a caseless round characterized by
improved environmental protection comprising an assembly of
components wherein each of said components as well as the assembled
round are provided with an energetic coating composition consisting
essentially of a high temperature resistant explosive.
The underlying concept of the present invention resides in the
proposition that the substitution of an energetic coating for the
non-energetic, caseless ammunition protective coating of the prior
art offers the advantage that no consumability accommodation is
required in the ballistic cycle. An added advantage stems from the
thermal resistance afforded by the thicker coatings without
undesirable effects on the ballistic cycle.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
The FIGURE depicts a sectional view in elevation of a small caliber
caseless round coated in accordance with the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Referring now to the single FIGURE of the drawing wherein a
sectional view in elevation of a preferred embodiment of the
invention is shown, a molded propellant 10 has the usual projectile
11 adhesively secured in a recess thereof. The adhesive may be of
any well-known combustible type, such as "Duco" cement, for
example, which is a nitrocellulose dissolved in methyl ethyl
ketone, and having no deleterious effects upon the molded
propellant. The projecle may partake of any suitable small arms
type, that shown being a typical jacketed type for receiving the
impressions of the lands and grooves to effect stabilization.
An axial cavity 12 if formed within the round and is generally
centrally disposed therewithin as shown.
A primer 13 is received within an axial recess 14 of substantially
the same diameter as cavity 12 but is separated therefrom by a wall
15 comprising the original integrally molded propellant. The wall
15 supports primer 13 when it receives an impact from a firing pin,
not shown. A coating 17, in accordance with the present invention,
is applied to the propellant components 10 and 13 by spraying,
dipping, etc. A final coat is also applied to the assembled
round.
The primer 13 is suitable of the type disclosed in U. S. Pat. No.
3,187,671 (Scanlon et al.) issued June 8, 1965, and containing a
lead styphnate type mix ignited by a percussion cap enclosed
between thin sheets of paper. The configurations of some of the
original propellant granules are shown at 16.
The propellant composition employed in the molded propellant
components discussed herein forms no part of the present invention
and may be any of the myroid of compositions typically used for
caseless ammunition. Examples thereof are found in "Propellant
Chemistry" by Stanly F. Sarner, Reinhold Publ. Co., New York
(1966), pages 108 - 111.
A suitable technique for binding propellant granules together to
form molded caseless ammunition components is disclosed by Quinlan
et al., infra, using a binder, such as collodion comprising 5%
nitrocellulose of 7-10% nitrogen content, the balance being 50--50
mixture of ethanol and ethyl ether. Such a binder is less energetic
than the propellant granules and possesses a slower burning
rate.
The coating composition of the present invention consists
essentially of an explosive which is resistant to high temperatures
and is desirably selected from the group consisting of
nitro-organics and nitrate esters. These organic compounds
incorporate oxygen into the molecule in an energetic form and
consequently, the coatings prepared therewith are regarded as
"energetic" coatings, that is, coatings which during the course of
the ballistic cycle have the net effect of supplying energy to the
propulsion system. The nitro-organics and particularly, the cyclic
nitro-organics such as RDX and HMX are preferred explosives for the
inventive coating compositions. RDX has the formula [CH.sub.2
NNO.sub.2 ].sub.3 and is named "trinitrotrimethylenetriamine"
commonly called "cyclonite", while HMX has the formula [CH.sub.2
NNO.sub.2 ].sub.4 and is named "tetranitrotetramethylenetetramine",
commonly called "homocyclonite". Other suitable high temperature
resistant explosives include those described by Sarner, infra,
pages 278 - 299.
For the purpose of improving the high temperature resistance of the
inventive coatings, the explosive material forming the essential
component thereof is mixed with an inert material, that is, a
non-energetic material which is consumable during the ballistic
cycle and does not detrimentally affect same. Suitable materials in
this regard comprise thermoplastic polymers and copolymers of
acrylic acid, butyric acid, methacrylic acid, esters of these
acids, and acrylonitrile. A preferred non-energetic material is
cellulose acetate. The proportion of non-energetic material
employed in the coating is such that the minimum employed is
sufficient to provide the desired thermal resistance while the
maximum employed does not detract from the net effect of supplying
energy to the propulsion system. In general, the coating may
consist of 80 parts by weight of explosive acid and up to about 20
parts weight of non-energetic material.
EXAMPLE I
A mixture of 20 parts by weight of cellulose acetate and 80 parts
by weight of RDX is prepared and added to acetone to form a
suspension. The liquid mixture is then employed to provide a
protective coating for a 7.62mm caseless round comprising a
projectile, a hollow cylindrical, molded propellant body and a
combustible primer assembly, consisting of primer cup, primer
pellet and propellant disc seal. The molded propellant components
employ nitrocellulose granules bound by collodion as described by
Quinlan et al., infra, and are coated by immersion in the liquid
mixture, the propellant body component being provided with a
suitable plug to prevent coating of the interior wall surfaces.
Thereafter, the solvent is evaporated from the wet coatings by
heating at 122.degree.F for 30 minutes. The coating procedure is
repeated until a coating thickness of about 5 mils is obtained. The
coated components together with the projectile are then assembled
to form a round and a final coating is applied as aforementioned.
The resultant round exhibits adequate moisture resistance as
evidenced by ability to be fired after immersion in water. Further,
the applied coating is high temperature resistant as evidenced by
an explosion temperature at least 50C..degree. higher than the
explosion temperature of the molded propellant.
EXAMPLE II
The procedure of Example I is carried out with the exception that
HMX is substituted for RDX. Comparable results are obtained.
I wish it to be understood that I do not desire to be limited to
the exact details of construction shown and described, for obvious
modifications will occur to a person skilled in the art.
* * * * *