U.S. patent number 3,729,097 [Application Number 05/128,876] was granted by the patent office on 1973-04-24 for filtration of molten metal.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Alcan Research and Development Limited. Invention is credited to Donald Louis William Collins, Brian Arthur Gillett.
United States Patent |
3,729,097 |
Collins , et al. |
April 24, 1973 |
FILTRATION OF MOLTEN METAL
Abstract
In the production of light metal castings by manual methods
molten metal is drawn in a ladle from a pool of metal within a
filter floating freely in a body of molten metal in a holding
furnace. The filter comprises a body made of a material which is
not attacked by the molten metal and is provided with one or more
apertures at or near the bottom end, these apertures being covered
with filter material so that solid inclusions are removed from
molten metal entering the filter body.
Inventors: |
Collins; Donald Louis William
(Rugby, Warwickshire, EN), Gillett; Brian Arthur
(Banbury, Oxfordshire, EN) |
Assignee: |
Alcan Research and Development
Limited (Montreal, Quebec, CA)
|
Family
ID: |
10060862 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/128,876 |
Filed: |
March 29, 1971 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 1, 1970 [GB] |
|
|
15,536/70 |
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
75/409;
75/412 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C22B
9/023 (20130101); B22D 39/026 (20130101); B22D
43/004 (20130101); B01D 29/01 (20130101); Y02P
10/20 (20151101); Y02P 10/234 (20151101) |
Current International
Class: |
B01D
29/01 (20060101); B01D 29/00 (20060101); B22D
39/02 (20060101); B22D 39/00 (20060101); B22D
43/00 (20060101); C22B 9/02 (20060101); B01d
035/28 () |
Field of
Search: |
;210/69,71,72,83,242 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Adee; John
Claims
We claim :
1. A method of filtering metal in the production of castings
comprising placing a freely floating filter member in a body of
molten metal, said filter member having an open top and an
imperforate side wall formed of a material, which is substantially
unaffected by the molten metal, while permitting molten metal to
enter the filter member at the bottom end thereof through a filter
medium associated with said bottom end, so that said molten metal
rises from below the level of said body and only through said
filter medium to form a pool in said member, said filter member
allowing sufficient width and depth of said pool formed by said
rise of filtered molten metal within said member, to permit
substantially unimpeded removal of metal in a ladle, and
withdrawing molten metal through the top of said filter member by
inserting a ladle into submergence in said pool and removing the
filled ladle through said top of the member, and thus causing
further molten metal to rise into said filter member through said
filter medium from the body of molten metal.
2. A method according to claim 1 in which molten aluminum is
filtered by means of a filter member formed of graphite.
3. A method according to claim 2 in which the pool of molten metal
is formed in essentially cylindrical shape by containment in said
side wall of essentially cylindrical form, said molten metal being
filtered by rising through glass cloth constituting said filter
medium closing said bottom end of the filter member.
4. A method according to claim 3 which includes stabilizing the
floating of said member by providing outward support in the molten
metal, around the mouth of the member, with a peripheral flange.
Description
The present invention relates to casting of light metals,
particularly aluminum (including aluminum alloys) but also of other
metals having comparably low melting points, such as magnesium and
its alloys. In particular the present invention relates to a method
of filtering molten metal in the production of castings.
The production of light metal castings, other than pressure die
castings, is essentially a manual operation, in which molten metal
is withdrawn from a holding furnace by means of a ladle. Large
quantities of internal combustion engine pistons are produced by
pouring molten aluminum alloy by means of a hand-held ladle into
permanent steel moulds. In producing this class of gravity
die-castings molten metal is taken from the holding furnace in a
quantity measured only by the operator's eye and any surplus in the
ladle is returned to the holding furnace before refilling the ladle
for the next casting operation.
Piston castings, for example, are machined. Any inclusions of hard
aluminum oxide are very objectionable both for the wear imposed on
the cutting tools during machining and for the likely wear on the
cylinder surfaces from any hard oxide exposed on the cylindrical
outer surface of the piston. In the production of aluminum alloy
piston castings by normal production methods, a significant
proportion of the castings are rejected for this reason.
It is well known in the production of aluminum and aluminum alloy
ingots to filter the molten metal during the pouring of the metal
into the continuous casting mould. A glass cloth bag has been found
to be a particularly suitable medium for the removal of solids,
such as aluminum oxide, in this context.
In the production of aluminum alloy castings the metal is melted in
a large capacity melting furnace from which it is transferred to a
number of small holding furnaces, from which one or occasionally
more operators may draw molten metal by means of a ladle. The
aluminum oxide dross is mainly produced in the melting furnace and
during pouring from the melting furnace into the holding furnace,
but does not arise to any significant extent in the holding
furnace. Such oxide dross as is produced in the holding furnace is
in the form of a very fine film. Filtration of the metal in the
holding furnace should therefore very largely obviate the
introduction of oxide, particularly in the form of large hard
grains, into the castings.
It has already been proposed to incorporate filter fixtures of
various kinds into the holding furnace. Some forms of filter
fixtures have required periodic vertical adjustment to take account
of variation in the metal level in the furnace or have retarded
removal of metal from the furnace when the metal level is low. Such
filter fixtures have thus reduced the rate of production attainable
by the operator and have thus not been generally adopted in the
production of aluminum alloy castings. It has already been proposed
to filter aluminum in a holding furnace by means of a crucible
which is supported by a framework extending across the mouth of the
furnace. Metal enters the crucible through apertures in the bottom
and rises through a bed of granular filter material. As already
stated the disadvantage of that type of filtering device is that
the level of metal in the crucible is dependent upon the level of
molten metal in the holding furnace with the result that a decrease
in metal level also results in a drop in the metal level in the
crucible with resultant difficulty in withdrawal of molten metal in
a ladle.
In another similar arrangement the crucible was held on a variable
support for height adjustment. Since in such arrangement the
support extends downwardly into the furnace from above it causes
obstruction in the accessibility of the pool of metal in the filter
to the ladle.
It has now been appreciated in accordance with the present
invention that these objections can be overcome if the filter body
is arranged as a free floating unit in the holding furnace. The
most suitable material for the construction of a floating filter
body for filtering molten aluminum is plumbago (graphite) which is
substantially unaffected by molten aluminum and has an appropriate
density, that is to say somewhat less than the density of molten
aluminum. However any other material which can resist molten
aluminum and has a density in the range of 1.5 - 2.5 would be
suitable for the purpose of filtering molten aluminum and indeed
some material of lower density may be employed in some
circumstances.
In constructing a floating filter a number of considerations must
be observed. Thus the width and depth of the pool of molten metal
within the filter must be sufficient to permit substantially
unimpeded removal of metal in the ladle. Furthermore the height of
the filter body above the metal level must be kept small so as to
avoid obstruction of the handling of the ladle by the operator.
Additionally the filter must be arranged so that it is fairly
stable and not easily overturned by accidental contact with the
ladle, which would result in the admission of unfiltered metal into
the pool of metal within the filter body. In general it is
preferred that the mouth diameter of the mouth of the filter body
be in excess of its depth.
The invention is further described with reference to the
accompanying drawings, wherein :
FIG. 1 illustrates one form of filter for carrying out the method
of the present invention.
FIG. 2 illustrates a second form of filter for carrying out the
method of the invention.
In both FIGS. 1 and 2 a body 1 of molten aluminum alloy is
maintained in a holding furnace 2, which is heated by gas burners
3. For convenience of illustration the holding furnace 2 is shown
greatly reduced in size and in practical operation it would be
substantially larger in diameter than the filters 4 and 4'.
The filter 4 shown in FIG. 1 comprises a cylindrical body 5 having
an outwardly extending peripheral flange 6. A shallow groove 7 is
formed in the wall of the cylindrical body 5 near the bottom end of
the filter body 4. This permits a layer of glass cloth 8 to be
secured across the open bottom end of the body 5 by means of a
glass binder thread 9.
The body 5 is formed of dense graphite of a density around 2.5 but
may be formed of other material which is substantially unaffected
by molten aluminum, provided that such material is less dense than
molten aluminum. The weight of the filter body can be increased by
means of an iron ring embedded in the graphite so as to be
protected from contact by molten aluminum to sink the filter 4
further into the aluminum, but this is not usually necessary.
In operation metal is removed from the pool of molten metal within
the filter 4 by means of a ladle 10. This reduces the level of the
metal in the filter and the body 5 rises in the body 1 of metal.
Metal then rises through the glass cloth 8 to restore the level of
the metal in the filter body with that of the body 1. Any grains of
oxide or other solid in the metal are removed by the filtering
action of the glass cloth 8. As the filter body rises in the metal
as the result of the removal of a ladle full of molten metal, there
is some tendency for the solid grains to be shaken off the glass
cloth and thus the filter has some self-cleaning tendency.
An alternative form of floating filter 4' is shown in FIG. 2. In
this case the floating filter 4' takes the form of a graphite
crucible with a series of apertures 11 formed in the bottom of it.
A bed 12 of granular filter material is supported in the bottom of
the filter and performs the same function as the glass cloth 8. The
bed 12 is preferably trapped beneath in a perforated disc (not
shown).
The floating filter of FIG. 1 is the preferred arrangement, both
because metal removed in the ladle is more quickly replaced through
the glass cloth and because the filter body is more inherently
stable and is very difficult to upset by contact with the ladle.
The layer of glass cloth is very easy to replace.
* * * * *