U.S. patent number 3,716,317 [Application Number 05/130,370] was granted by the patent office on 1973-02-13 for pack for spinning heterofilament fibers.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Fiber Industries, Inc.. Invention is credited to Henry Rausch, Jr., Milton Guy Williams, Jr..
United States Patent |
3,716,317 |
Williams, Jr. , et
al. |
February 13, 1973 |
PACK FOR SPINNING HETEROFILAMENT FIBERS
Abstract
A spin pack is provided for producing heterofilaments from two
polymer streams. Each stream is subdivided and the subdivisions
filtered and delivered to a common header. The two headers are
parallel and are defined between the upper face of a spinnerette
and the adjacent members. Off each header and extending toward the
other are a plurality of grooves, the grooves of one header
alternating with those of the other and constituting pairs or
couplets. Between each pair of grooves there are a plurality of
channels of precise dimensions, e.g. length of at least about 0.075
inch, width of at least about 0.016 inch and depth of from about
0.005 to 0.030 inch, and a spinning orifice is located centrally of
each channel. In this fashion each orifice gets the same amount of
each polymer.
Inventors: |
Williams, Jr.; Milton Guy
(Charlotte, NC), Rausch, Jr.; Henry (Charlotte, NC) |
Assignee: |
Fiber Industries, Inc.
(Charlotte, NC)
|
Family
ID: |
22444379 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/130,370 |
Filed: |
April 1, 1971 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
425/198; 425/463;
264/172.14; 264/172.17; 264/172.18; 264/172.15 |
Current CPC
Class: |
D01D
5/32 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
D01D
5/32 (20060101); D01D 5/30 (20060101); D01d
003/00 (); D01d 001/10 () |
Field of
Search: |
;425/462,463,131,132,133,198,199,382S ;264/176F |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Overholser; J. Spencer
Assistant Examiner: Sutton; Michael O.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A spinnerette provided in its upstream face with
a. a pair of independent polymer distribution headers;
b. each header being provided with a plurality of grooves, the
grooves from each header being grouped into parallel pairs;
c. a plurality of feed channels extending between the grooves
making up each pair, said feed channels having a length of at least
about 0.075 inch, a width of about 0.016 to 0.050 inch and a depth
of about 0.005 to 0.30 inch; and
d. a plurality of orifices extending through said spinnerette to
the downstream face, said orifices being located centrally of said
feed channels;
whereby upon supplying a different polymer stream to each of said
headers, each polymer stream flows to its respective grooves and
then along each channel to meet the other polymer stream midway of
the channel, the streams exiting from each orifice in side-by-side
relationship.
2. A spinnerette according to claim 1, wherein said feed channels
have a length of about 0.150 inch, a width of about 0.032 inch and
a depth of about 0.01 to 0.02 inch.
3. A spinnerette according to claim 1, wherein the orifices are
circular and have a diameter of about 0.040 to 0.070 inch.
4. A spinnerette according to claim 2, wherein the headers are
parallel, the grooves are parallel, the feed channels are parallel,
and the orifices are parallel, the orifices being circular and
having a diameter of about 0.055 to 0.065 inch, said headers,
grooves, channels and orifices being successively perpendicular to
one another.
5. A spin pack comprising a pack body, a plurality of filter means
and a spinnerette, said pack body being provided with a pair of
bores for introduction of polymer, a pair of multiple elongated
passages, the passages of each of the pairs communicating at one of
their ends with a respective one of the bores and at the other of
their ends with said spinnerette, the filter means being separately
associated with the passages making up each of the pairs so that
two liquids each respectively flowing through one of the pair of
passages will be filtered separately, said spinnerette being
provided with a pair of independent distribution headers each to
receive liquid from a respective one of the pair of multiple
passages, a plurality of orifices extending through the
spinnerette, and means for delivering the liquid from each of said
headers to each orifice through which said two liquids issue in
side-by-side relationship.
6. A spin pack according to claim 5, wherein said spinnerette is
additionally provided with a plurality of grooves, the grooves
communicating at one end with one header, the grooves from each
header being grouped into parallel pairs, and a plurality of feed
channels extending between the grooves making up each pair, said
feed channels having a length of at least about 0.075 inch, a width
of about 0.016 inch to 0.048 inch and a depth of about 0.005 to
0.030 inch, said orifices being located centrally of said feed
channels.
7. A spin pack according to claim 6, wherein said feed channels
have a length of about 0.150 inch, a width of about 0.032 inch and
a depth of about 0.01 to 0.02 inch.
8. A spin pack according to claim 5, wherein said filter means
comprise a sintered metal filter associated with each passage.
9. A spin pack according to claim 7, wherein said filter means
comprise a sintered metal filter associated with each passage, and
wherein the headers are parallel, the grooves are parallel, the
feed channels are parallel, and the orifices are parallel, the
orifices being circular and having a diameter of about 0.040 to
0.070 inch, said headers, grooves, channels and orifices being
successively perpendicular to one another.
Description
The present invention relates to an apparatus for the production of
large numbers of uniform heterofilaments.
In the production of synthetic fibers it has proven desirable to
produce filaments which are not homogeneous in cross-section.
Rather, filaments having zones of different composition in
cross-section have proven desirable for certain purposes. Thus, the
zones may differ in color, in chemical composition, or the like. If
the components are sufficiently different in physical properties,
for example, they will frequently shrink non-uniformly during the
post-treatment and the resulting filament will no longer be
straight. Alternatively, the different composition may result in
some zones becoming tacky at elevated temperatures at which the
other zones are unaffected so that the filaments can be bonded to
one another or a substrate without complete loss of tenacity. In
still another possibility, one zone may accept a dye while the
other does not.
The different zones are generally more or less well-defined and
while there may be some irregularity along the interface they
generally fall into the two major categories side-by-side and
sheath core. In side-by-side heterofilaments each component is
partially on the outside of each filament while in sheath core one
component surrounds the other. Side-by-side heterofilaments are
produced by bringing the two fiber-forming streams together at some
point upstream of the spinnerette orifice and allowing them to
issue together. Sheath-core heterofilaments can be produced by
surrounding one stream by the other and directing the
compound-stream to the spinnerette orifice. Alternatively, it is
sometimes possible to produce sheath-core heterofilaments by
side-by-side extrusion if the temperature and viscosity conditions
are such that upon issuing under the influence of surface tension
the less viscous material flows and surrounds the more viscous
component.
In such side-by-side extrusion, whether the ultimate filaments are
side-by-side or sheath-core, it has not proven too difficult to
spin more than one filament, using a plurality of orifices arranged
in a circle and supplied with polymers from sources equidistant
from all the orifices. If such distances are not equal, the
distribution of each polymer to the several orifices will vary,
e.g., while the overall composition of polymers A and B may be
50--50, some filaments may be 100%A, 80%A, 40%A or 0%A. For most
purposes such variation is undesirable.
If the arrangement of spinning orifices is rectilinear rather than
circular, the problem of uniformity of distribution is especially
pronounced. Those orifices most remote from a feed duct will have
the lowest pressure and they are found to produce filaments which
differ markedly from the average in denier as well as in
composition.
When it is desired to spin large numbers of filaments the foregoing
problems are aggravated since there is a limit to the number of
orifices which can be provided in a circular locus and the problems
of non-uniform pressure drop in rectilinearly arranged orifices is
especially pronounced as the number of orifices increases.
The problems are further aggravated when the proportions of the
polymers are far from equal, i.e., when one is present in two or
three times the amount of the other.
It is accordingly an object of the present invention to provide an
apparatus for producing heterofilaments of interfilament
uniformity.
It is a further object of the invention to provide an apparatus for
extrusion of a plurality of two component side-by-side
fiber-forming streams.
A further object is to provide a simple apparatus of such type
wherein the number of filaments can be varied easily and
inexpensively.
Still another object is to provide a process for simultaneously
producing many heterofilaments of interfilament uniformity even at
relatively high ratios of one of the components to the other.
These and other objects and advantages are realized in accordance
with the present invention wherein there is provided a novel spin
pack and especially a novel spinnerette.
The novel spin pack comprises a pack body for distribution of
polymer streams, a filtration section, a further distribution
system and a spinnerette for extrusion. The body is provided with a
pair of inlets for receiving two fluid streams. The inlets each
lead to a bore from which a plurality of passages branch off. Each
branch passage includes a special filter of high capacity such as a
sintered metal hollow body through whose wall polymer must flow,
the effective surface area and pore size being selected to give a
predetermined pressure drop and degree of filtration. The
individual filters are removable and, following cleaning, may be
reused.
The pack body filtration selection are joined in such fashion that
they can readily be separated for access to and removal of the
filters. Advantageously, a gasket is provided to improve the seal
about each passage.
From the multiple passages associated with each bore, the multiple
streams enter a header bounded by and defined between the
filtration section and spinnerette. The header can be gouged out of
either or partially out of both the filtration section and the
upper face of the spinnerette. Its cross-sectional area is not
critical so long as it is relatively uniform and several fold
greater than that of subsequent passages through which the polymer
streams must later flow.
From the header a plurality of grooves extend, also defined between
the filtration section and spinnerette and gouged in whole or in
part out of either. The groove cross-section is also not critical.
The number of grooves off each header will generally be equal to
the number of bundles into which it may be desired to group the
filaments ultimately obtained, e.g., if six bundles of filaments
are desired there could be six, 12, etc., grooves. The number of
passages leading to each header is independent of the number of
grooves leading away from each header. The number of grooves off
both headers are equal, each groove off one header forming a pair
or couplet with a corresponding groove off the other, i.e., the
grooves off one header extend toward, but terminate short of, the
other like a ladder whose rungs are incomplete alternately at each
end.
Between each pair of grooves a plurality of channels extend and
their dimensions are the most important feature of the invention.
These channels are also defined between spinnerette and filtration
section and they are equal in number to the number of filaments to
be produced. For this reason they are preferably gouged out of the
upper face of the spinnerette, i.e., if it is desired to change the
number of filaments being spun, it is necessary to change only the
spinnerette without disassembling more of the spin pack. The
channels should be arranged substantially uniformly along each
groove except that the dead end of each groove desirably extends
somewhat past its last channel to ensure that the last channel is
not accidently of different length from the others.
The channels should be at least about 0.075 inch long and
preferably at least about 0.150 inch long. Their depth into the
spinnerette face should be at least about 0.005 inch and preferably
at least about 0.010 inch up to about 0.030 inch while their width
should be at least about 0.016 inch and preferably at least about
0.032 inch up to about 0.060 inch; the cross-sectional area is
advantageously about 0.000080 to 0.000960 square inch and
preferably about 0.000160 to 0.000480 square inch. If this
cross-sectional area is less than about 3 percent that of the
grooves and headers, the extrusion will be relatively insensitive
to minor variations in pressure along the grooves. Advantageously,
the total cross-sectional area of the channels off a groove, i.e.,
the product of individual channel cross-sectional area multiplied
by the number of channels per groove, is less than about 50 percent
and preferably less than about 20 percent of the cross-sectional
area of each groove to minimize the pressure drop along the groove
from the beginning to the end of the groove. As indicated, the
channels are preferably rectangular in cross-section but this is
merely for ease of formation and they could be polygonal,
elliptical, semi-circular, or the like.
Centrally of each channel an orifice of varying diameter so as to
include at least one countersink and a capillary is drilled through
the spinnerette from top to bottom. The upper section of each
spinnerette is, in effect, a countersink of enlarged
cross-sectional area leading into a reduced area portion
(capillary) of the shape and dimension needed for the filaments.
Generally the area of the orifice at the channel (i.e., the upper
part of the countersink portion) will be from about 0.00125 to
0.00385 and preferably from about 0.00238 to 0.00332 square inch.
These may be noncircular but are preferably circular, for ease of
formation, and thus are wider than the channel at their intercept.
Advantageously, the length of each channel beyond the countersink
in both directions, i.e., half the channel length minus the
countersink radius, is at least about 0.0075 inch and preferably at
least about 0.045 inch. The length of the countersink is not
significant; it should be so long relative to the thickness of the
spinnerette that the portion of reduced diameter is of the length
desired in view of known requirements of spinnerette orifices.
Preferably the headers are parallel to one another, the grooves are
parallel, the feed channels are parallel and the orifices are
parallel, said headers, grooves, channels and orifices being
successively perpendicular to one another.
Advantageously, the spin pack is made of metal inert to the
materials with which is comes into contact. Individual bolts may
pass through all component parts to unite them into the spin pack
or individual parts may be separately fastened so that complete
disassembly is not necessary to remove or replace only some of the
parts.
The polymeric fiber-forming material supplied to the spin pack may
be a solution or melt and the technique for forming fibers may
include melt spinning, which is preferred, as well as wet or dry
spinning. The fiber-forming material may include polyesters,
polyamides, polyolefins, polyhaloolefins, cellulose esters,
viscose, acrylics, and the like, e.g., homopolymers and/or
copolymers of terephthalic acid, isophthalic acid, adipic acid,
sebacic acid, ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, butylene glycol,
hexamethylene diamine, ethylene, propylene, butylene,
acrylonitrile, methyl acrylate, vinyl acetate, vinylidene cyanide,
vinyl chloride, vinylidene chloride, caprolactam, aminoundecanoic
acid, and the like. Representative polymers include polyethylene
terephthalate, polybutylene terephthalate, nylon 66, nylon 6, nylon
66-nylon 6 copolymers, polyethylene, polypropylene, polybutylene,
poly-vinyl chloride-vinylidene chloride, cellulose acetate
including triacetate, cellulose propionate, acrylonitrile-methyl
acrylate copolymer, and the like.
The two polymer streams may differ from one another in polymer or
merely in molecular weight, in pigmentation, or in any other
fashion. Upon extrusion through an apparatus as described herein,
the bi-component filaments will all have approximately the same
composition rather than some being high in one component with
others high in the second component. Thus, over a range of 3:1 to
1:1 for the two components, it has been found that at least about
90 percent of the filaments will vary by less than about 10 percent
and preferably less than about 5 percent from the overall
composition (i.e. if the overall composition is 50 percent
Component A, then at least about 90 percent of the filaments will
have from 40 to 60 percent Component A).
The resulting filaments as extruded can range in denier from as
little as 3 or less to as much as 60 or more, depending upon
intended use and post treatment. Generally the filaments will be
drawn from about two- to 10-fold to develop their potential
physical properties. The filaments may be collected as yarn or may
be converted into staple fiber and spun into yarn which can be used
to make fabrics and end products which may then be treated, as by
immersion in hot water, to produce differential shrinkage and
bulking.
The number of filaments collected into a bundle will of course
depend upon the desired ultimate denier. The novel arrangement
permits the filaments issuing along each groove to be grouped
independently of the groups or bundles from other grooves, in
contrast with generally unsuccessful attempts to subdivide the
array of filaments into smaller bundles when using apparatus
wherein the spinning orifices are arranged in a circle. In this
fashion a single spin pack and spinnerette can be used to form a
plurality of independent yarn bundles.
The novel arrangement is especially suited for use in producing
spun-bond non-woven products where a relatively small number of
undrawn filaments are passed through an aspirating jet wherein a
fast-moving stream of fluid such as air draws the filaments down at
the same time as it propels them toward a moving support. Since
there is a practical upper limit to the size of the aspirating jet
if the air consumption is not to be too great, this places a
corresponding limit on the number of filaments which can be
handled, e.g., fewer than about 40 and generally fewer than about
20. Instead of providing a spinnerette and spin pack for each
aspirator, the present invention permits multiple aspirators to be
supplied from a single common source. The resulting non-woven
structure can then be treated in known fashion, e.g., by spot
heating to activate the lower-melting polymer while leaving the
other polymer substantially unaffected.
The invention will now be described with reference to the
accompanying drawings wherein:
FIG. 1 is a lateral elevation of a spin pack in accordance with the
invention;
FIG. 2 is a section taken along line 2--2 of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a section taken along line 3--3 of FIG. 1, looking
down;
FIG. 4 is an enlarged section taken along line 4--4 of FIG. 3;
FIG. 5 is an enlarged section taken along line 5--5 of FIG. 3;
FIG. 6 is a section taken along line 6--6 of FIG. 1, looking
up;
FIG. 7 is an enlarged section taken along line 7--7 of FIG. 6;
FIG. 8 is an enlarged fragmentary section taken along line 8--8 of
FIG. 6; and
FIG. 9 is a section taken along line 9--9 of FIG. 1.
Referring now more particularly to the drawings, in FIG. 1 there is
shown a spinpack 10 comprising a polymer receiving section 12, a
polymer filtration section 14, a spinnerette 16 and a cap 18. The
bolts 20 serve to secure the cap 18 to the polymer receiving
section 12 and the bolts 22 serve to unite the polymer receiving
section 12 to the filtration section 14, bolts 22a unite the
spinnerette 16 and the filtration section 14.
As seen in FIG. 2 one polymer stream enters the pack 10 through a
coupling 24 and a second stream enters through coupling 26. Polymer
flows from the couplings 24, 26 to their respective distribution
bores 28,30 and from each bore to a plurality of passages 32a, b,
c, etc. and 34a, b, c, etc., all of which are identical so only one
need be further described. Each passage 32 or 34 includes an
enlarged chamber 36 defined by matching holes in the polymer
receiving section 12 and filtration section 14 between which a
gasket 38 is positioned to effect a tight seal. Preferably, there
is one gasket fro each passage which gaskets may be made of
materials such as Teflon or aluminum.
A hollow sintered stainless steel needle filter 40, open at its
lower end is positioned in each chamber so that liquid entering the
chamber from a passage 32 or 34 must pass from outside the filter
through it to be inside. From inside the bank of filters associated
with each group of passages 32 or 34, the polymer flows through the
continuation of the passages into a header 42 or 44. As can be seen
in FIG. 7, these headers are parallel to one another and as can be
seen in FIG. 1 they are approximately semi-circular in
cross-section with their flat facing downward, being defined
partially by removal of metal from the filtration section 14 and
from the upper face of spinnerette 16. The passages 32a, b, etc.,
and 34a, b, etc., communicate with their respective headers
approximately at equal distances therealong.
As can best be seen in FIG. 3, the headers 42 and 44 have a
plurality of grooves, 46a, b, etc., and 48a, b, etc., respectively.
In this embodiment, the grooves are six in number and are spaced
substantially uniformly along their header. The grooves 46a, 48a
form a pair between which there extend a plurality of feed channels
50, in this case 15 between each pair of grooves for a total of 90
channels. Centrally of each channel 50 and perpendicular thereto
there is drilled a spinning orifice comprising an enlarged
countersink 52 at its lower end terminating in a section 54 of
reduced diameter which is of such length and dimension as is
necessary for producing suitable filament-forming streams of
polymer.
The feed channels 50 are each at least about 0.075 inch and
preferably at least about 0.150 inch long, i.e., in the vertical
direction as viewed in FIG. 3. The channel width, which is the
horizontal dimension in FIGS. 3 and 5, is from about 0.0010 to
0.064 inch and preferably from about 0.016 to 0.032 inch. The depth
of the channels, i.e., the vertical dimension in FIGS. 4 and 5, is
from about 0.005 to 0.030 inch and preferably from about 0.01 to
0.02 inch.
These channel dimensions are essential for producing the desired
result, which is insensitivity to minor pressure fluctuations, or
minor variations in the dimensions of the different channels. The
configuration of the grooves 46 and 48 is such that thy minimize
any pressure drop therealong, i.e., polymer is delivered to each
channel at approximately the same pressure. Since some channels are
closer to one header than to the other, it might have been expected
that the relative proportions of the two polymer streams would vary
from orifice to orifice along each channel but actual measurements
show this does not occur. Rather, the novel configuration permits
uniform delivery of each polymer to each orifice so that the
filament issuing from each hole will have approximately the same
proportion of each component as the overall filament bundle, i.e.,
.+-.10 percent from the overall composition.
To this end the channel dimensions must be substantially uniform so
that the pressure drops will be equal. Thus, the dead ends of the
grooves extend slightly past the last channel to ensure such
equality of channel length.
The sintered metal needle filters provide more filtration area than
could be obtained in an equivalent volume of conventional sand
filter. The porosity of the filter can be selected as desired to
provide the desired pressure drop and degree of filtration.
Moreover, following disassembly the needle filters can be steam
and/or hot air cleaned and reused.
The novel spinnerette and spin pack permit production of large
numbers of uniform streams comprising two different polymers
meeting along an interface. This is especially suited for making
bilateral filaments such as of two different molten polymer
streams. The novel configuration readily allows grouping of the
filamentary streams from the orifices along each channel to form a
bundle separate and distinct from the bundles of filaments from
other respective channels. As noted hereinbefore, the polymer
streams may differ in the chemical composition of their polymers,
or both could have the same polymers but of different molecular
weights, or the streams could be differently pigmented, or the
like.
The invention will now be further described in the following
illustrative examples.
EXAMPLE 1
A spin pack as shown in the drawings was assembled using stainless
steel sintered needle filters of 10 micron porosity, the headers 42
and 44 having a cross-sectional area of about 0.0520 square inches.
The grooves 46, 48 have cross-sectional areas of about 0.0277
square inches. The feed channels 50 are about 0.175 inch lone 0.032
inch wide and 0.010 inch deep, the countersinks 52 being about
0.060 inch in diameter and 0.660 inch long, the overall spinnerette
thickness being about 0.750 inch having spinnerette holes of about
0.030 inch diameter and a capillary length of about 0.090 inch. The
spin pack was used to spin ninety heterofilaments of an overall
composition of equal weights of a 40 relative viscosity (measured
in 8 percent formic acid at 25.degree. centigrade) nylon 66 polymer
and a 35 relative viscosity copolymer comprising 35 mole percent of
units of hexamethylenediamine, 35 mole percent of adipic acid units
and 30 mole percent of united of epsilon-caprolactam, i.e.
epsilon-aminocaproic acid. The spinning block was heated to
280.degree. centigrade. The spinning pack fits in the block, as in
a Dowtherm box, the pack being heated by heat transfer from block
and from polymer. The molten polymers were fed to the pack from
separate melt extruders and metering pumps. Each polymer was
supplied at the rate of 3.37 pounds per hour. The filaments which
issued were grouped into six bundles of 15, one bundle from each
group of feed channels, and each bundle was passed through an
aspirating jet having an inlet bore diameter of about 0.040 inch.
The jets were positioned 12 feet below the spinnerette, thereby
drawing down the filaments about 35 times to a final denier of
about 6.0 each and expelling them at a linear velocity of about
2,800 feet per minute. The expelled filaments were projected toward
a moving screen, depositing in the form of a non-woven web which
could be collected, bonded or processed in known manner.
The individual filaments making up the web were examined in
cross-section under the microscope. In 100 samples, 91 had
filaments wherein neither component was present in more than about
60 percent, i.e., 50 .+-. 10 percent, as determined by
cross-section, The individual filament tenacity in 10 samples
ranged from about 1.75 to 2.50 grams per denier and averaged 2.0
grams per denier. The individual elongations in such samples ranged
from about 135 to 275 percent and averaged about 200 percent.
With the particular group of aspirating jets employed, it was not
possible to accommodate more than about 15 filaments and still
achieve the minimum level of physical properties desired and needed
in superior products.
In parallel runs with the relative proportions of the polymers at
3:1 and 1:3 by weight, cross-sectional photomicrographs showed that
in each run the proportion of the major component in more than 90
percent of the filaments was 75 .+-. 10 percent.
EXAMPLE 2
Heterofils were spun using 1.8 pounds per hour of each of
polyethylene terephthalate of 0.61 intrinsic viscosity measured in
orthochlorophenol at 25.degree.centigrade and a terephthalate of a
75-25 (by moles) mixture of ethylene glycol-diethylene glycol
having an intrinsic viscosity of about 0.60. The spin pack
contained a 38 micron stainless steel filter and differed from that
of Example 1 in that a different spinnerette was used; the
spinnerette holes were 0.015 inch diameter and 0.045 inch length.
Each pair of grooves were connected by only five channels so that
only 30 filaments are extruded. The header area was 0.2705 square
inch; the groove area was 0.0214 square inch and the feed channel
length was 0.114 inch. The spin pack temperature was 285.degree.
centigrade. The issuing filaments were passed over a finish roll
and collected at 1,000 feet per minute as an undrawn yarn of 775
denier. The yarn was drawn at a ratio of 4.5 in a hot finish spray
at 92.degree. centigrade and the resulting 7.5 denier filaments had
a tenacity of 3.0 grams per denier and an elongation of 45 percent.
Photomicrographs showed 95 percent of the filaments to have each
component present to the extent of 50 .+-. 10 percent.
EXAMPLE 3
A spinning pack with 90 spinnerette holes of 0.015 inch diameter by
0.045 inch length was used to spin side-by-side heterofilament
fibers from a 0.61 intrinsic viscosity polyester and a copolymer of
tetramethylene terephthalate with ethylene terephthalate. The
copolymer was composed of 32 mole per cent tetramethylene
terephthalate units and had an intrinsic viscosity of 0.60 when
measured in o-chlorophenol at 25.degree. centigrade. The pack
employed contained 38 micron porosity sintered stainless steel
filters, feed channels of 0.175 inch in length, 0.032 inch in width
and 0.010 inch depth. The countersinks to the individual
spinnerette holes were 0.060 inch in diameter and 0.705 inch in
length. The spinning pack temperature was maintained at a
temperature of 280.degree. centigrade by an electrically heated
block. A total throughput of 8.30 pounds per hour split equally
between the two polymers was used. The fiber was cooled by a
crossflow of air and wound-up at 2,000 feet per minute to yield 927
denier.
The fiber was plied together to form a heavy tow and drawn on a
staple fiber drawframe. A draw ratio of 4.05 was used and hot
liquid finish at 92.degree. centigrade was sprayed onto the tow
immediately after it left the feed rollers to localize the
drawpoint. After crimping in a stuffer box crimper and heat-setting
at 112.degree. centigrade for 18 minutes, the fiber was cut to 11/4
inch staple. The staple had a denier per filament of 3.2, a
tenacity of 3.2 grams per denier and a elongation to break of 34.5
percent.
It will be appreciated that the instant specification and examples
are set forth by way of illustration and not limitation, and that
various modifications and changes may be made without departing
from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
* * * * *