U.S. patent number 3,715,500 [Application Number 05/164,507] was granted by the patent office on 1973-02-06 for unidirectional microphones.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated. Invention is credited to Gerhard Martin Sessler, James Edward West.
United States Patent |
3,715,500 |
Sessler , et al. |
February 6, 1973 |
UNIDIRECTIONAL MICROPHONES
Abstract
A second-order unidirectional microphone is constructed with two
pairs of acoustic tubes arranged to sample a sound field at four
different points on a straight line. Acoustic signals from two
diametrically opposed tubes, one short and one long, are summed in
a first cavity and signals from two other opposed tubes, one short
and one long, are summed in another cavity. Signals developed in
the two cavities are differentially combined by an electret or
other transducer interposed between the cavities. Necessary signal
delay is provided directly by differences in tube lengths.
Inventors: |
Sessler; Gerhard Martin
(Summit, NJ), West; James Edward (Plainfield, NJ) |
Assignee: |
Bell Telephone Laboratories,
Incorporated (Murray Hill, NJ)
|
Family
ID: |
22594801 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/164,507 |
Filed: |
July 21, 1971 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
381/191 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H04R
1/38 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H04R
1/38 (20060101); H04R 1/32 (20060101); H04r
001/32 () |
Field of
Search: |
;179/121D,1DM,121R,111E |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Blakeslee; Ralph D.
Assistant Examiner: Leaheey; Jon Bradford
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A unidirectional microphone, which comprises,
first and second selectively dimensioned acoustic chambers,
electroacoustic means positioned to separate said chambers for
differentially converting acoustic signals in said chambers into
electrical signals,
first and second acoustic tubes of first and second lengths,
respectively, mated into said first chamber and extending outward
therefrom to sample a sound field at first and second points on a
straight line, and
third and fourth acoustic tubes of said first and second lengths,
respectively, mated into said second chamber and extending outward
therefrom to sample said sound field at third and fourth points on
said straight line,
the sampling end of said first tube and the sampling end of said
fourth tube being spaced apart from one another on said straight
line by the same distance as the sampling end of said second tube
and the sampling end of said third tube are spaced apart on said
straight line, and the sampling ends of said first and said second
tubes being spaced farther apart from one another than the sampling
ends of said third and said fourth tubes.
2. A unidirectional microphone as defined in claim 1, wherein, said
electroacoustic means comprises a foil-electret transducer.
3. A unidirectional microphone as defined in claim 1, wherein,
said tubes of said first length are selected to be longer than the
tubes of said second length by a length related to the spacing on
said straight line between the sampling point of one of said first
length tubes feeding said first chamber and one of said second
length tubes feeding said second chamber.
4. A unidirectional microphone as defined in claim 3, wherein,
the ratio of the difference in length between said tubes of said
first and second lengths to the spacing on said straight line
between the sampling point of that of said first length tubes
feeding said first chamber and one of said second length second
tubes feeding said second chamber is unity.
5. A directional electrostatic transducer, which comprises,
first and second selectively dimensioned cylindrical acoustic
cavities,
transducer means separating said cavities for differentially
converting acoustic signals supplied to said cavities into
electrical signals,
two acoustic tubes of first and second lengths opening,
respectively, into said first and second cavities and extending
outward therefrom to sample a sound field at first points separated
from one another by a selected distance on a straight line parallel
to a diameter of said cavity, and
two acoustic tubes of said first and second lengths opening,
respectively, into said second and first cavities and extending
outward therefrom to sample said sound field at second points
separated from one another by said selected distance and
diametrically opposed to said first points on said line,
the sampling ends of said tubes opening into said first cavity
being spaced farther from one another than the sampling ends of
said tubes opening into said second cavity.
6. A directional transducer as defined in claim 5, wherein,
said electrostatic transducer means comprises, a foil-electret
transducer supported between said cavities in a plane perpendicular
to an axis thereof.
7. A unidirectional second-order gradient microphone, which
comprises,
first and second selectively dimensioned acoustic cavities,
transducer means intermediate said chambers for differentially
converting acoustic signals in said cavities into electrical
signals,
two acoustic tubes of first and second lengths opening,
respectively, into said first and second cavities and extending
outward therefrom in a first direction to sample a sound field at
points on a straight line separated from one another by a selected
distance, and
two acoustic tubes of said first and second lengths opening,
respectively, into said second and first cavities and extending
outward therefrom in a second direction opposite to said first
direction to sample said sound field at points on said straight
line separated from one another by said selected distance.
8. A second-order gradient microphone, as defined in claim 7,
wherein,
all of said tubes are equipped with means for damping acoustic
resonances.
9. A second-order gradient microphone, as defined in claim 7,
wherein,
said cavities are proportioned to be resonant at the lower end of
the frequency range to be accommodated by said microphone.
10. A second-order gradient microphone which comprises, in
combination,
a cylindrical casing,
electroacoustic transducer means coextensive with the internal
cross section of said casing and positioned to separate said casing
into two selectively dimensioned acoustic chambers,
a first pair of acoustic tubes with open ends of first and second
lengths, respectively, opening into one of said chambers and
extending outward therefrom to sample a sound field, respectively,
at first and second points on a straight line, and,
a second pair of acoustic tubes with open ends of said first and
second lengths, respectively, opening into the other one of said
chambers and extending outward therefrom to sample said sound
field, respectively, at third and fourth points on said straight
line,
said first and said second sampling points being spaced apart from
one another by a greater distance than said third and said fourth
sampling points, and the spacing between said first and said fourth
sampling points being equal to the spacing between said second and
said third sampling points.
Description
This invention relates to electroacoustic transducers and more
particularly to a directional microphone with a unidirectional
directivity pattern.
Background of the Invention
Directional microphones are commonly employed in a variety of audio
communications systems to emphasize weak signals in a noisy
environment and to reduce the effects of reverberations. Such
microphones also find application in situations where such sounds
have a degrading influence on the quality of sound transmission.
Microphones are available with numerous diverse sensitivity
patterns ranging from the omnidirectional to the unidirectional
patterns. In sound studio applications and the like, the
unidirectional microphone is widely used.
Description of the Prior Art
Unidirectional microphones, e.g., either first-order gradient
(cardioid), or second-order gradient microphones, respond
predominantly to sound incident from one direction. A first-order
cardioid pattern is achieved by combining in phase opposition the
output of a pressure-sensitive element with the delayed output of a
second pressure-sensitive element separated from the first by a
distance that is small compared to a wavelength. A second-order
gradient pattern is achieved by combining in phase opposition the
output of a pressure-gradient element with the delayed output of
another pressure-gradient element separated from the first by a
distance that is small compared to a wavelength. In some
microphones the delay is provided by an acoustical network
integrally associated with the microphone structure, e.g., by
cavity arrangements exposed to a sound field at prescribed
locations or by arrangements of acoustic tubes spaced to open at
selected points in a sound field. In others, electrical delay
networks are interposed between the two transducer elements to
achieve a desired directional pattern. Either arrangement requires
a complex structure. In addition, an electrical delay system often
requires auxiliary energizing power. It is evident, of course, that
a microphone, to be generally useful in a wide variety of
applications should be relatively simple in construction,
reasonably small in size and devoid of all unnecessary electronic
apparatus and power-consuming elements.
Thus, it is an object of the present invention to overcome the
faults of prior microphone arrangements in a simple, compact
electroacoustic transducer which exhibits a unidirectional
directivity pattern.
Summary of the Invention
In accomplishing this and other objects and in accordance with the
invention, a unidirectional microphone is constructed by combining
two first-order gradient microphones. Directionality is achieved by
adding the output of a first-order gradient microphone to the
delayed output of another, spatially displaced, but in-line,
gradient microphone of opposite polarity. In accordance with the
invention, the requisite delay is produced by means of two pairs of
sensing tubes of different lengths. The tubes are arranged to
sample a sound field at four different points on a straight line.
Acoustic signals from two diametrically opposed tubes, one short
and one long, are summed in one cavity, and acoustic signals from
two other diametrically opposed tubes, one short and one long, are
summed in another cavity. Signals developed in the two cavities are
differentially combined by an electret transducer interposed
between the cavities. By an appropriate selection of tube lengths
and placement, the signal delay necessary to achieve a
unidirectional characteristic is obtained directly without other
electrical or mechanically means.
Brief Description of the Drawing
The invention will be more fully understood from the following
description of a preferred embodiment thereof taken in connection
with the appended drawings, wherein:
FIG. 1 depicts a unidirectional microphone constructed in
accordance with the invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic cross section of the unidirectional electret
microphone shown in FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a schematic representation of the design principle of the
invention which illustrates the combination of two first-order
gradient microphones to achieve a directional characteristic,
and
FIG. 4 is the directivity pattern of a unidirectional microphone in
accordance with the invention for different physical
dimensions.
Detailed Description
A microphone which embodies the principles of the invention in a
compact, durable configuration suitable for use in numerous
applications is illustrated in FIG. 1. The microphone of FIG. 1
comprises a structure which includes two first-order gradient
transducers of opposite polarities spaced apart from one another, a
delay system, and an arrangement for adding the output of one of
the gradient transducers to the delayed output of the other. It
will be recognized that the addition of signals from two gradient
microphone systems in this manner gives rise, in accordance with
the well-known gradient principle, to a unidirectional sensitivity
response pattern. Both signal delay and signal addition, however,
is accomplished, in accordance with this invention by virtue of the
structural arrangement employed; no additional electrical
components are needed.
A sound field is sampled at four selected points in a straight line
by means of two pairs of acoustic tubes, 10 and 12, and 11 and 13,
which feed acoustic signals into cylindrical casing 14. Tubes 10
and 12 are of equal length and feed sound from two separated points
on a straight line passing through a diameter of cylindrically
shaped casing 14. Signals from tubes 10 and 12 are brought,
respectively, into upper and lower cavities in casing 14, and serve
differentially to excite opposite sides of transducer 20 placed
within cavity 14 in a plane perpendicular to its axis. Transducer
20 in fact divides the casing into two separate cavities. The
system of tubes 10 and 12, the two cavities, and transducer 20
together constitute a first-order gradient microphone.
Tubes 11 and 13 are likewise of equal length but the length of the
pair of tubes 11 and 13 is different from the length of the pair of
tubes 10 and 12. Tubes 11 and 13 sample a sound field at two points
on the same straight line, passing through a diameter of casing 14.
Signals from the tubes are brought respectively into the upper and
lower cavity portion of the casing and serve differentially to
excite opposite sides of transducer 20. The system of tubes 11 and
13, the two cavities, and the transducer constitute another
first-order gradient microphone.
The internal construction of the transducer of FIG. 1 is
illustrated in FIG. 2. It will be observed that the casing 14 is
divided into two internal cavities 15 and 16 by a transducer
arrangement supported perpendicular to the axis of casing 14. The
transducer is formed of a perforated backplate 17 and a foil
electret 18 held in close proximity to perforated backplate 14.
Foil electret 18 seals the two cylindrical cavities from each
other. Cavity 15 receives acoustic energy from tube 10, a longer
tube, and from tube 11, a shorter tube, both arranged to sample a
sound field on a straight line, e.g., on a diameter of the
cylinder. Tubes 10 and 11 form parts of two different gradient
microphone systems; their sound signals are effectively added
together in cavity 15. Lower cavity 16 is fed by tube 12, a longer
tube, and tube 13, a shorter tube, both arranged to sample the
field at points on the same straight line as the sampling points of
tubes 10 and 11. Tubes 12 and 13 form parts of two different
gradient microphone systems; their sound signals are added together
in cavity 16.
The principle of operation of the unidirectional microphone of the
invention is schematically indicated in FIG. 3. In the figure,
d.sub.2 represents the separation of the open outer ends of
acoustic tubes 10 and 12, which together form one first-order
gradient microphone, and also represents the separation of the open
outer ends of acoustic tubes 11 and 13, which together form another
first-order gradient microphone. Distance d.sub.1 indicates the
separation between the tubes of the two gradient systems. The short
tubes 11 and 13 belong to a gradient with a small delay whereas the
long tubes 10 and 12 belong to a gradient with a greater delay. If
the difference in the length of the two pairs of tubes is denoted
d.sub.3, the delay .tau. between the two gradient transducers is
given by d.sub.3 /c, where c is the velocity of sound. The required
delay .tau. for the directional transducer is established entirely
by the system of acoustic tubes. It is represented in FIG. 3 as
element 30 solely to illustrate the relationships involved.
In a conventional system signals from two gradient microphones are
individually summed, signals from one are delayed, e.g., in delay
system 30, and the two resultant signals are then added, e.g., in
adder 31. In accordance with this invention, to the contrary,
addition of pairs of signals takes place directly in the respective
cavities, and the necessary delay is achieved directly through the
selection, dimensioning, and placement of the system of acoustic
tubes.
Details of the construction of a cavity transducer employing
acoustic tubes are described in detail in Sessler-West U.S. Pat.
No. 3,573,400, issued Apr. 6, 1971. The directional microphone
described in that patent achieves a toroidal sensitivity
characteristic. Yet, structural elements similar to those used in
fabricating the unidirectional microphone of this invention are
identical. Accordingly, details of fabrication are omitted
here.
In a typical transducer unit 20 employed in practice, a backplate
17 was constructed from a brass disc 4 cm in diameter with 100
holes 0.08 cm in diameter, and with four circular ridges on one
surface, each 25.4.mu.m high. Electret foil 18 consisted of a
25.4.mu.m layer of fluoroethylenepropylene, marketed commercially
under the trademark Teflon FEP, which was metalized on one side and
charged preferably using an electron beam method. The transducer
formed by the backplate and the electret foil is mounted so that
the two chambers formed within casing 14 are sealed from each
other. In practice, one of the two chambers is adjustable in
volume, e.g., using a screw plunger or the like to permit tuning of
the acoustic (Helmholtz) resonances of the tube cavity system.
Electrostatic transducers employing perforated backplates and foil
electret diaphragm members are known to those skilled in the art
and described, for example, in Sessler-West U. S. Pat. No.
3,118,022, granted Jan. 14, 1964. Details of backplate preparation,
ridge structure, and the like are similarly known and described in
the art, for example in Sessler-West U. S. Pat. No. 3,118,979,
granted Jan. 21, 1964.
In the example of practice, tubes 10 and 12 were 5 cm long and
tubes 11 and 13 were each 3.5 cm long. The two sets of tubes had
inner and outer diameters of 0.22 and 0.32 cm, respectively. All
tubes were open at their ends and were filled with approximately 60
mg. of steel wool to damp acoustic resonances.
Each cavity and its associated tubes thus form a Helmholz resonator
or an acoustic low-pass filter. By placing the resonance frequency
at the lower end of the frequency range of interest, a compensation
of the .omega..sup.2 dependence, discussed below, of the
sensitivity of the system is achieved.
Since all four sensors are, in this invention, arranged to sample a
sound field at points in a straight line, the directivity pattern
of the transducer is rotationally symmetric. Addition of the output
voltages of both gradient systems thus yields a sensitivity pattern
S given by
S = A(ikd.sub.2) [exp(ikd.sub.1) + exp(ikd.sub.3) ], (1)
where A is a constant of proportionality independent of frequency
and angle of incidence .theta. relative to the rotational axis of
the system, i represents the imaginary operator, k represents wave
number, k is equal to (k cos .theta.), and d.sub.1, d.sub.2, and
d.sub.3 represent spacings, in cm, as illustrated in FIG. 3. For
kd.sub.1 <<1 and kd.sub.3 <<1, this may be written
as
S = A(ikd.sub.2) (ikd.sub.1 + ikd.sub.3)
= A(k.sup.2 d.sub.2 cos .theta.) (d.sub.3 + d.sub.1 cos .theta.)
(2)
The sensitivity S of the system, for a constant angle of incidence,
follows from Equation (2) and is given by
S = Bk.sup.2 = B(.omega./c).sup.2 , (3)
where B is a constant of proportionality independent of frequency
and .omega. represents angular frequency. Sensitivity is thus
proportional to the square of frequency.
For constant frequency and for d.sub.1 =d.sub.3, sensitivity S,
also following from Equation (2), is given by
S = D cos .theta. (1 + cos .theta.) , (4)
where D is a constant of proportionality independent of angle of
incidence. The directivity pattern is thus characterized by a
maximum at .theta. = 0.degree., zeros at .theta. = 90.degree. and
180.degree., and two sidelobes at .theta. = 120.degree..
Theoretical directivity patterns of the transducer for a number of
ratios d.sub.3 /d.sub.1 are tabulated in the patterns of FIG.
4.
Frequency response measurements on the transducer constructed in
practice and described above indicate that sensitivity for .theta.
= 0.degree. is within 2 db from 250 Hz to 3 kHz. The response for
.theta. = 90.degree. and 180.degree. is 10-20 db lower than the
response for .theta. = 0.degree. over most of the telephone band.
The Helmholz resonance of the system aids materially in
compensating and equalizing the system. The measured directivity
index for the microphone described in detail above is about 8 db as
compared with a calculated value of 8.7 db.
It is evident that the exact sensitivity and directivity patterns
for the transducer may be altered by varying the overall size of
the unit, the relative sizes of the cavities and the lengths of the
tubes. With such modifications, however, the relationships among
the various elements must, of course, be maintained to achieve the
results described herein. Moreover, it will be recognized that the
unidirectional characteristic of the microphone of the invention
reduces to a cardioid pattern if only two of the tubes are used to
supply signal samples to the system, one short tube to feed one
cavity and one long tube to feed the other cavity.
* * * * *