U.S. patent number 3,715,421 [Application Number 05/028,821] was granted by the patent office on 1973-02-06 for process for the preparation of polyethylene terephthalate filaments.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Societe de la Viscose Suisse. Invention is credited to Bernhard Glutz, Hans Linz, Horst G. Martin.
United States Patent |
3,715,421 |
Martin , et al. |
February 6, 1973 |
PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE
FILAMENTS
Abstract
A continuous spin-draw process is disclosed for preparing highly
drawn polyethylene terephthalate filaments drawn at speeds greater
than 1,800 meters per minute using only one heated draw roll system
without the use of any other heating device. Feed and draw rolls
are provided with a surface roughness which allows a slipping of
the filaments along a number of turns before they leave the feed
rolls and after they arrive at the draw rolls. The filaments are
partially drawn at the lower temperature of the feed rolls, drawing
continues between the feed and draw rolls, and is completed at the
higher temperature of the draw rolls with a total draw ratio
between 5 and 8.
Inventors: |
Martin; Horst G. (Zug,
CH), Glutz; Bernhard (Lucerne, CH), Linz;
Hans (Lucerne, CH) |
Assignee: |
Societe de la Viscose Suisse
(Emmenbruche, CH)
|
Family
ID: |
21845636 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/028,821 |
Filed: |
April 15, 1970 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
264/130;
264/210.7; 28/245; 528/308.2 |
Current CPC
Class: |
D02J
1/224 (20130101); D02J 1/226 (20130101); D01D
5/16 (20130101); D02J 1/22 (20130101); D01F
6/62 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
D02J
1/22 (20060101); B29f 003/00 (); D01d 005/08 ();
D01d 005/12 () |
Field of
Search: |
;264/21F,290,29T,130,DIG.73 ;28/71.3,75R ;260/75T |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
611,444 |
|
Dec 1960 |
|
CA |
|
1,006,348 |
|
Sep 1965 |
|
GB |
|
1,176,164 |
|
Jan 1970 |
|
GB |
|
628,863 |
|
Oct 1961 |
|
CA |
|
1,011,645 |
|
Dec 1965 |
|
GB |
|
Primary Examiner: Anderson; Philip E.
Claims
We claim:
1. Continuous process for the preparation of highly drawn
polyethylene terephthalate filaments which comprises extruding
molten polyethylene terephthalate through a spinnerette to form
filaments, quenching the filaments, applying to the filaments a
lubricating finish, passing the filaments successively over a feed
roll system and a draw roll system, each system comprising at least
two cylindrical rolls with each roll having a surface roughness
with a roughness height as defined by ASA B 46.1 - 1962 of 0.5-2.2
microns, allowing a slipping of the filaments around the feed roll
system and the draw roll system of one to five turns, driving at
least one feed roll and one draw roll by a motor, arranging said
systems so that the axis of the feed roll from which the filaments
leave the feed roll system and the axis of the draw roll at which
the filaments arrive at the draw roll system are parallel while the
axes of at least two of the feed rolls of the feed roll system are
skew set to each other and the axes of at least two of the draw
rolls of the draw roll system are skew set to each other, gradually
drawing the filaments, starting the drawing while the filaments
pass around the last one to five turns before leaving the feed
rolls which have a surface temperature of 75.degree. - 130.degree.
C., and completing the drawing while the filaments pass around the
first one to five turns after arrival on the draw rolls which have
a surface temperature of 180.degree. - 240.degree. C. and a surface
speed at least five times that of the feed rolls, drawing the
filaments at a total draw ratio of not less than 5.0, and finally
winding up the drawn filaments at a speed of not less than 1,800
meters per minute.
2. Process as set forth in claim 1 including using a lubricating
finish which contains not more than 10 percent by weight of
water.
3. Process as set forth in claim 1, wherein the spun filaments
before arriving at the feed roll system, pass over a pre-tension
roll system comprising at least one unheated motor-driven roll,
using a surface speed of the pre-tension unheated roll which is
lower than the surface speed of the feed rolls with the speed
difference not exceeding 2 percent.
4. Process as set forth in claim 1 including providing said rolls
with a surface roughness range, as defined by DIN 4762, of 4.5 -
8.0 microns, a peak distance of not more than 140 microns, an
average peak distance of 40 - 60 microns, and a profile curvature
of not more than 0.030 microns.sup.-.sup.1.
5. Process as set forth in claim 4 including providing said rolls
with an average roughness range of 1.6 - 3.0 microns.
6. Process as set forth in claim 1 including providing said rolls
with a peak distance of not more than 140 microns.
7. Process in accordance with claim 6 including providing said
rolls with an average peak distance of 40 - 60 microns.
8. Process in accordance with claim 1 including providing said
rolls with a profile curvature of not more than 0.030
microns.sup.-.sup.1.
9. Continuous process for the preparation of highly-drawn
polyethylene terephthalate filaments which comprises extruding
molten polyethylene terephthalate through a spinnerette to form
filaments, quenching the filaments, applying to the filaments a
lubricating finish, passing the filaments over feed rolls and draw
rolls which have a surface roughness which allows slipping of from
one to five turns before the filaments leave the feed rolls and
after the filaments arrive at the draw rolls, the feed rolls having
a surface temperature of 75.degree. - 130.degree. C, and the draw
rolls having a surface temperature of 180.degree. - 240.degree. C
and a surface speed at least five times that of the feed rolls,
partially drawing the filaments at the lower temperature of the
feed rolls, continuing to draw the filaments between the feed rolls
and the draw rolls, and completing the drawing of the filaments at
the higher temperature of the draw rolls to attain a total draw
ratio of 5 to 8, and winding up the drawn filaments at a speed of
1,800 to 6,000 meters per minute.
10. A process as set forth in claim 9 wherein the temperature of
the feed rolls is 80.degree. - 90.degree. C, and the temperature of
the draw rolls is 210.degree. - 230.degree. C.
11. Process as set forth in claim 9 including using a lubricating
finish which contains not more than 10 percent by weight of
water.
12. A process as set forth in claim 9 wherein said surface
roughness consists of a coherent, non-porous, abrasion-resistant,
impermeable coating of tiny, smooth-topped elevations of unequal
height and irregular distribution in all directions on the surface
of said rolls.
13. A process as set forth in claim 12 wherein said coating is a
metal.
Description
This invention relates to a continuous process for the preparation
of highly drawn polyethylene terephthalate filaments by
melt-spinning of the polymer followed immediately by drawing of the
spun filaments without prior winding up. As used herein,
polyethylene terephthalate means a fiber-forming long chain
synthetic polymer composed of at least 85 percent by weight of an
ester of ethylene glycol and terephthalic acid.
It is well known that filaments useful for textile and industrial
purposes can be prepared by extruding molten polyethylene
terephthalate through a spinnerette and winding up the quenched
filaments. It is further known that, to obtain their optimal
properties, the filaments must be drawn to several times their
original length to produce orientation along the fiber axis. This
is usually done by winding off the spun filaments and by passing
them over sets of rolls driven at different speeds and eventually
heating the filaments by various means to facilitate drawing.
It would obviously be of advantage to eliminate the step of winding
up the undrawn quenched filaments and to wind them off again for
the purpose of drawing. Such processes have already been proposed.
Thus, U.S. Pat. No. 2,604,667 proposes to produce oriented
polyethylene terephthalate fibers by withdrawing melt-spun fibers
from the spinnerette at high speeds of 4,700 meters and more per
minute. Another method is described by U.S. Pat. No. 3,002,804 for
passing melt-spun quenched filaments through a liquid drag bath.
British Pat. No. 1,168,767 proposes to pass such filaments over a
drag pin aggregate at a defined distance from the spinnerette and
to withdraw the filaments at a low tension.
It is a disadvantage of all these processes that they generally do
not allow freely to select and to predetermine the draw ratios. The
processes also do not permit high draw ratios which are necessary,
for example, to produce filaments of low elongation. It is known
that draw ratios of at least about 5 are required to realize this
aim. Such highly drawn polyethylene terephthalate filaments of good
uniformity are only obtainable, if drawing is done by the use of
feed and draw roll systems in which the rolls have exactly
specified speeds.
To obtain filaments of very high draw ratios, it is essential to
heat the filaments during drawing, and various devices are used for
this purpose. Thus, U.S. Pat. No. 3,216,187 describes, inter alia,
a continuous one-step process for the preparation of high-strength
polyethylene terephthalate filaments, in which the filaments are
heated by passing through a steam jet while moving from the feed
rolls to the draw rolls. As the passage of the filaments through
the steam occurs only during a very short period, the temperature
of the steam must be very high to transfer sufficient heat to the
filaments. Temperatures of 350.degree.-450.degree. C. are used,
i.e., temperatures which are 100.degree.-200.degree. C. above the
melting point of the polymer.
Another well-known method is to pass the filaments to be drawn over
heated pins or plates. However, at the high winding up speeds
employed at present, the period of contact between the filaments
and such heating devices is very short, as the size of the pins and
plates is limited by the overall dimensions of the machine. These
methods therefore also require the use of rather high temperatures
in order to transfer the necessary amount of heat during the short
period of contact. Similar to the method using a steam jet, the
temperature gradient along the diameter of the filaments during
drawing is therefore rather high. A much better way to heat the
filaments is the use of heated feed and draw rolls. As the
filaments can pass over such rolls several times, they may have a
considerably longer period of contact with the heating device than
when using hot plates or steam jets. For transfer of the same
amount of heat, the temperature of the heated rolls can therefore
be kept considerably lower than that of the other practicable
heating devices described above. The temperature of the rolls will
always remain below the melting point of the filaments, and the
temperature gradient along the diameter of the filaments will be
quite moderate. The use of heated rolls is therefore a very safe
and effective way of heating the filaments for the purpose of
drawing. The amount of heat transferred depends on the size and
temperature of the rolls, the number of filament turns around the
rolls, and the speed of the filaments.
If freshly spun polyethylene terephthalate filaments, which are
practically non-crystalline, are for the purpose of being highly
drawn, rapidly heated to temperatures of about 180.degree. C., they
suddenly start to crystallize and become sticky during a short
period of time. It has also been observed that the temperature at
which the filaments become sticky depends, inter alia, on the speed
with which the filaments are heated. If therefore filaments pass
from a conventional polished feed roll to a polished draw roll,
such filaments having a temperature of at least 180.degree. C.,
which was found by the inventors to be the minimum temperature to
obtain high draw ratios at speeds of 1,800 meters per minute or
more, a sticky mass of filaments is wrapped around the draw roll,
and the filaments cannot proceed and cannot be wound up.
However, if the spun filaments pass from a polished feed roll to a
polished draw roll having a temperature substantially below
180.degree. C., and are partially drawn and oriented, they can
easily proceed to a second polished draw roll having a
substantially higher temperature, without showing any adhesive
properties. By a second drawing, filaments of a high total draw
ratio can be obtained. Accordingly, the already cited U.S. Pat. No.
3,216,187 also describes such a two-stage drawing process, in which
freshly spun polyethylene terephthalate filaments pass, without
prior winding-up, from a feed roll having a temperature of slightly
over 100.degree. C. to a first draw roll heated to
150.degree.-155.degree. C. and then to a second draw roll heated to
about 225.degree. C.
The use of only one heated draw roll system would, of course,
represent an essential improvement of existing processes and would
be of considerable technical and economic advantage. British Pat.
No. 1,176,164 describes such a process of drawing polyethylene
terephthalate filaments by using only one draw roll system heated
to 220.degree. C, said draw roll system having a modified surface
showing tiny protuberances of equal height which are regularly or
irregularly distributed, preferably forming a series of microridges
parallel to the roll axis. It is the aim of this device to allow a
steady decrease of the tension of the filaments during their last
turns around the draw roll. It is also stated that a roll surface
having unequal protuberances is not suitable for this purpose.
However, to achieve draw ratios of 5.3-5.4, British Pat. No.
1,176,164 requires the use of an additional hot plate between feed
and draw roll, and the wind-up speed is only 152 meters per minute.
The process is therefore not suitable to obtain high draw ratios at
the high wind-up speeds required for spin-drawing polyethylene
terephthalate filaments.
It is the object of this invention to provide a continuous
spin-draw process for the preparation of highly drawn polyethylene
terephthalate filaments drawn at high speeds by the use of only one
heated draw roll system and without the use of any heating device
other than heated rolls.
The process according to the present invention comprises extruding
molten polyethylene terephthalate through a spinnerette to form
filaments, quenching the filaments, applying to the filaments a
lubricating finish, passing the filaments successively over a feed
roll system and a draw roll system, each system comprising at least
two cylindrical rolls, each roll having a surface roughness of a
roughness height, as defined by ASA B 46.1 - 1962, of 0.5-2.2
microns, allowing a slipping of the filaments around the feed roll
system and the draw roll system of one to five turns, at least one
feed roll and one draw roll being motor-driven. The axis of the
feed roll from which the filaments leave the feed roll system and
the axis of the draw roll at which the filaments arrive at the draw
roll system are parallel, while the axes of the feed rolls and the
draw rolls, respectively, are skewed. The process includes
gradually drawing the filaments in a manner so that starting the
drawing occurs while the filaments pass around the last one to five
turns before leaving the feed rolls which have a surface
temperature of 75.degree.-130.degree. C, and completing the drawing
while the filaments pass around the first one to five turns after
arrival on the draw rolls which have a surface temperature of
180.degree.-240.degree. C, drawing the filaments at a total draw
ratio of not less than 5,0, and finally winding up the drawn
filaments at a speed of not less than 1,800 meters per minute.
Both the feed roll system and the draw roll system shall consist of
at least two rolls of equal or different size, and at least one
feed roll and one draw roll shall be driven by a motor. The use of
a motor for the additional rolls depends on whether or not they can
be moved without difficulty by the drawing force of the passing
filaments. At least one of the feed rolls shall be heated to
75.degree.-130.degree. C, and preferably to 80.degree.-90.degree.
C, and at least one of the draw rolls shall be heated to
180.degree.-240.degree. C, and preferably to
210.degree.-230.degree. C. How many rolls are to be heated is
determined by the aim that the filaments assume the same
temperature as the heated rolls of the system over which they pass.
No other heating device for the purpose of drawing the filaments is
provided. The examples describe the use of two heated motor-driven
feed rolls and two heated motor-driven draw rolls, all rolls having
the same size with a diameter of 180 millimeters.
The filaments pass several times both over the feed rolls and the
draw rolls, before they are finally wound up. The high draw ratios
used according to the invention correspond to very high tensions of
the filaments during drawing, and, at the temperatures employed,
these tensions may be as high as one-third of the breaking strength
of the filaments. The high tensions require a special position of
the feed and draw rolls, such a position being used in all the
examples. All feed and draw rolls should be cylindrical, and as
shown in FIG. 4 the axis of the feed roll from which the filaments
leave the feed roll system and the axis of the draw roll at which
the filaments arrive at the draw roll system shall be parallel. In
this connection, it has also to be considered that the filaments
passing from the feed roll to the draw roll system, will form an
angle of 90.degree. to the axis of the feed roll from which they
leave and to the axis of the draw roll at which they arrive (see
FIG. 4), if the use of filament guides is to be avoided. If these
conditions are not implemented, the filaments coming from the feed
rolls will run off from the draw rolls and will go astray. In
addition, within the feed and draw roll systems, the axes of the
two feed rolls and the axes of the two draw rolls, respectively,
are skew set (see FIG. 4) to effect a correct separation of the
passing filaments. The speed of the feed and draw rolls shall be
such as to obtain a draw ratio of not less than 5.0. The draw ratio
is defined as the ratio between the surface speed of the draw rolls
and the surface speed of the feed rolls. The filaments shall
perform at least so many turns around the respective rolls, that
the surface speed of the rolls corresponds to the speed of the
filaments at a point about half-way between the points of entry to,
and exit from, the respective rolls. At otherwise equal conditions,
the draw ratio also depends on the spinning speed of the filaments,
higher spinning speeds producing a lower draw ratio. According to
the invention, the wind-up speed shall be not less than 1,800
meters per minute. The upper limit of the wind-up speed is given by
limitations of performance and equipment and may be as high as
6,000 meters per minute. The optimal draw ratio obtainable also
depends on the melt viscosity of the filaments, a lower melt
viscosity producing a lower orientation of the spun filaments and
therefore permitting a higher draw ratio.
It is essential for the successful realization of the objects of
this drawing process that the feed and draw rolls have a surface
roughness, which will allow a slipping of the filaments along a
number of turns before they leave the feed rolls and after they
arrive at the draw rolls. As stated above,
polyethyleneterephthalate filaments temporarily become sticky,
when, for the purpose of drawing, they are quickly heated to
temperatures of about 180.degree. C, so that they wrap up around
the draw rolls and cannot properly pass on. The slipping of the
filaments allowed by the surface roughness of the rolls makes it
possible that the filaments are gradually drawn along their way
from the last few turns around the feed rolls up to the first few
turns around the draw rolls.
This means that the filaments are partially drawn and oriented at
the lower temperatures of the feed rolls, that the drawing
continues between the feed and draw rolls, and that the drawing is
completed at the higher temperatures of the draw rolls, finally
reaching a high total draw ratio of not less than 5.0. As already
explained above, when describing a conventional two-stage drawing
process, filaments already partially drawn and oriented at lower
temperatures on a first draw roll system, can proceed to a second
draw roll system having substantially higher temperatures without
showing any adhesive properties. By the use of feed and draw rolls
with a rough surface which allows a limited slipping of the
filaments, the process according to the invention applies a gradual
drawing of the filaments on and between one feed roll system and
one draw roll system heated to different temperatures, and thereby
saves the use of a second heated draw roll system.
How the slipping allowed by the rough surface of the rolls makes it
possible to start the drawing of the filaments already on the feed
rolls, is demonstrated by the following Table showing the speed of
the filaments measured at different turns before leaving the feed
rolls.
Turns Before Filaments Leave Filament Speed Feed Rolls
(meters/minute)
__________________________________________________________________________
41/4 364 31/4 365 21/4 371 13/4 858 11/4 1505 1/4 1798
__________________________________________________________________________
In this experiment, the surface speed of the feed rolls was 364
meters per minute, and the surface speed of the draw rolls was
2,171 meters per minute. The Table shows, how, under the pull from
the rapidly moving draw rolls, the speed of the filaments increases
during their last turns around the feed rolls indicating that the
drawing of the filaments has begun. A still more complete picture
of a drawing performance of filaments according to the invention,
is given in Example I, Table 1 a, showing the tension of the
filaments along their whole way around the feed and draw rolls.
To allow a slipping of the filaments over one to five turns of the
rolls, the nature of the roughness of the roll surface is of great
importance. Preferably, the roll surface shall consist of a
coherent, non-porous coating of tiny, smooth-topped elevations of
defined unequal height and defined irregular distribution in all
directions of the surface. The description and definition of such a
surface can only be made by use of statistical terms introducing
averages from a great number of single figures having considerable
fluctuations. For evaluation of these figures, use is made of a
surface profile which is the contour of a surface taken, in any
direction, in a plane perpendicular to the surface.
FIG. 3 shows such a profile of a roll surface according to the
invention. The profile was measured with a "Talysurf" instrument
made by Taylor-Hobson Co., England. One centimeter of the vertical
scale represents 0.45 microns, and 1 centimeter of the horizontal
scale represents 19.8 microns. The evaluation of the profile is
made about the "center line" which is the line parallel to the
general direction of the profile, such that the sums of the areas
contained between the center line and those parts of the profile
which lie on either side of it are equal (ASA B 46.1 - 1962). The
evaluation was carried out by use of a digital computer permitting
an accuracy corresponding to distances of the measured profile of
.+-. 0.01 microns in vertical direction and of .+-. 1.0 microns in
horizontal direction.
Terms suitable to describe and define surface roughness are given
by American and German Standards, and additional terms have been
introduced to meet the special requirements of the invention. The
most important term is the "roughness height" which is the
arithmetical average deviation expressed in microns measured normal
to the center line (ASA B 46.1 - 1962). The roughness height of the
surfaces according to the invention shall be 0.5 - 2.2 microns.
Other suitable terms to define the surface roughness according to
the invention are:
"Roughness range" which is the distance between the highest and the
lowest point of the surface texture measured normal to the center
line ("Rauhtiefe" according to DIN 4762). The roughness range of
the surface according to the invention shall be 4.5 -8.0
microns.
"Average Roughness Range" which is the distance between the average
height of the peaks and the average depth of the bottoms of the
surface texture measured normal to the center line. The average
roughness range of the the surfaces according to the invention
shall be 1.6 - 3.0 microns.
"Peak Distance" which is the distance between successive peaks. The
peak distance of the surfaces according to the invention shall not
exceed 140 microns.
"Average Peak Distance" which is the average distance between two
successive peaks. The average peak distance of the surfaces
according to the invention shall be 40 - 60 microns.
"Profile Curvature" which is the reciprocal radius of curvature at
any point of the profile. The profile curvature of surfaces
according to the invention shall not exceed 0.030
microns.sup..sup.-1 to exclude any sharp peaks or bends of the
profile.
It should be noted that the terms adopted to describe and define
the surface roughness according to the invention do not include the
term "roughness width" which is the distance between successive
peaks which constitute the predominant pattern of the roughness
(ASA B 46.1 - 1962). This term, which is somewhat similar to that
of a wavelength is only applicable to patterns of a predominantly
periodic lateral surface texture, different from the surfaces
according to the invention with their great fluctuations of peak
distance values.
A roll surface according to the invention can be produced by
several methods, for example by sandblasting under controlled
conditions followed by galvanic metal coating, by depositing metals
in crystallized form from a gaseous phase, or by affixing small
metallic globules of different size. It should be noted that
sandblasting alone without a subsequent metal coating would produce
elevations having too sharp peaks. It is emphasized that the
elevations shall form a non-porous, coherent coating which is
abrasion-resistant and impermeable.
As lubricating finish for the filaments a composition is preferred
which does not contain more than 10 per cent by weight of water. As
shown in the examples, such a finish facilitates producing
filaments of considerably higher draw ratios and higher tenacities
than a finish having a high water content or an emulsion-type
finish. One of the reasons for the advantage of the finish
according to the invention is probably that it does not consume any
substantial amount of heat from the heated rolls for the purpose of
evaporation of water.
A possible modification of the inventive process is characterized
by the use of an additional pre-tension roll system comprising at
least one unheated motor-driven roll and a separator roll, over
which the filaments pass on their way from the spinnerette to the
feed rolls. The motor-driven pre-tension roll and the separator
roll have, of course, the same surface speed, and this speed shall
be slightly lower than the surface speed of the feed rolls, the
speed difference not to exceed 2 percent. This speed difference
will produce some tension of the filaments, which is well within
the range of reversible elastic elongation of the undrawn
filaments. The advantage of such a pre-tension roll system is that
the filaments run very quietly over the feed rolls and do not show
any undesired sideway movements. Further advantages are described
in detail in Example IV.
FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic illustration of apparatus in accordance
with one embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic illustration of apparatus in accordance
with another embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 3 is a profile of a roll surface in accordance with the
invention.
FIG. 4 is a simplified perspective view of the apparatus
illustrated in FIG. 1, and specifically indicating the surface
roughness of the feed and draw rolls, as well as the skew sets
within the feed roll system and the draw roll system,
respectively.
FIGS. 1 and 4 show schematically one embodiment of an arrangement
suitable for preparing spin-drawn filaments according to the
invention. The filaments 2 extruded for spinnerette 1 are exposed
to transversely directed stream of air 3, and are passed over a
guiding device 4 and roll 5 applying a lubricating finish.
Thereafter, the filaments pass around heated feed rolls 6 and
heated draw rolls 7. The drawn filaments are wound-up as usual on
bobbin 8. Such an arrangement is used in Examples I, II, and
III.
FIG. 2 shows schematically another possible embodiment of an
arrangement which comprises the same elements as shown in FIG. 1,
but, in addition, contains a pre-tension roll 9 with separator roll
10 arranged before the feed rolls. Two relaxation rolls 11 are
arranged between draw rolls 7 and windup bobbin 8. Such an
arrangement is used in Examples IV, V and VI. The following
examples will show details as to the performance of the process and
the properties of the filaments obtained. The tenacities of the
filaments were determined by the use of an INSTRON Tester and refer
to the filament denier at zero elongation. The tension of the
filaments passing around the various rolls were measured by a
ROTHSCHILD ELECTRONIC TENSIOMETER. The intrinsic viscosity [.psi.]
is defined by the following equation:
wherein .psi.spec. means the specific viscosity at 25.degree. C of
a solution of 0.5000 grams of polyethylene terephthalate in 100
milliliters of a mixture of equal parts by weight of phenol and
tetrachloroethane.
EXAMPLE I
This example shows the dependence of filament tenacity, elongation,
and shrinkage upon the draw ratio. It further shows, at a fixed
draw ratio, the filament tensions existing at various positions in
relation to the feed and draw rolls.
The polyethylene terephthalate filaments leaving the spinnerette
were quenched by transverse air, passed over a convergence guide,
and were treated with a lubricating finish. Where a preparation
based on isooctyl stearate containing 6-7 weight percent water is
the lubricating finish, a suitable temperature for the lubricating
finish treatment is 80.degree. C.
A wide variety of lubricating finishes may be used in the subject
invention, and such lubricating finishes and their operative
temperatures, per se, form no part of the present invention.
Examples of suitable lubricating finishes are set forth hereinafter
in Example VI.
The filaments passed over two motor-driven rolls, acting
simultaneously as withdrawal rolls for the spun filaments and as
feed rolls for the drawing process, and then over two motor-driven
draw rolls, whereafter the drawn filaments were wound up. All rolls
had a diameter of 180 millimeters, and their axes were in a
position as prescribed by the specification. The rolls had a
surface roughness as roll surface type E of Example V.
The two feed rolls were heated to 85.degree. C, and the filaments
passed around the feed rolls in 12 turns. Different draw ratios
were obtained by variation of the surface speed of the feed rolls
between 327 and 372 m/min. The two draw rolls were heated to
210.degree. C, the surface speed of the draw rolls was 2,180 meters
per minute, and the filaments also passed around the draw rolls in
12 turns. To effect some relaxation, the filaments were wound up at
a speed of 2,000 meters per minute, i.e., at a speed slightly less
than the speed of the draw rolls.
The spun, undrawn filaments had an intrinsic viscosity of 0.75 and,
at a withdrawal speed of 372 meters per minute, a birefringence of
0.6 - 0.7 .times. 10.sup..sup.-3. The drawn filaments had a total
denier of 1,000/192 and a finish content of 0.5 - 0.6 percent.
Table 1 gives the figures for tenacity and break elongation of the
drawn filaments at different draw-ratios:
TABLE
1 Break Tenacity Elongation Draw Ratio (g/denier) (%) 5.9 7.6 18
6.1 7.7 17 6.3 8.0 16 6.5 8.2 16 6.7 8.5 14
__________________________________________________________________________
As Table 1 shows, the filaments obtained according to the inventive
process have been drawn at a high draw-ratio and possess a high
tenacity and a medium break elongation.
Table 1 a shows, at a constant draw ratio of 6.1, the tension of
the filaments measured before and after contact with, and at
various turns around the feed and draw rolls:
TABLE 1
a Filament Filament Tension (in mg/denier of the Position wound-up
filament) Feed Rolls Draw Rolls
__________________________________________________________________________
Before contact 40 2500 1 turn 20 2000 2 turns 15 1500 3 turns 15
1300 4 turns 10 1200 5 turns 10 1300 6 turns 10 1300 7 turns 0 1300
8 turns 0 1000 9 turns 200 950 10 turns 250 150 11 turns 400 100 12
turns 1600 50 After contact 2500 15
__________________________________________________________________________
As Table 1 a shows, the filament tension on the feed rolls
decreases over the first eight turns. The reason is that the length
of the filaments increases when they are heated above their glass
transition temperature which is about 70.degree. C. The strong
increase of the filament tension during the last four turns around
the feed rolls indicates that the pull from the draw rolls has
become effective, and that the gradual drawing of the filaments has
begun. As explained above, this gradual drawing is made possible by
the slipping effect due to the special rough surface of the rolls.
The slipping effect is also the cause of the decrease of the
filament tension while passing around the first four turns around
the draw rolls. Table 1 a also shows that at a position about four
turns after arrival on, and before departure from, both the feed
and draw rolls, the respective filament tensions remain constant
within a rather small range. It was also found that, at these
positions, the filament speeds coincided with the respective
surface speeds of the rolls.
The low filament tension at the central turns around the feed rolls
may cause undesirable sideway movements of the filaments. This can
be prevented by the insertion of an additional unheated pre-tension
roll between the spinnerette and the feed rolls, as described in
Example IV.
EXAMPLE II
This example describes the properties of the filaments at different
temperatures of feed and draw rolls. The filaments were spun and
drawn as described in Example I, with the following differences:
The feed rolls had a surface speed of 374 meters per minute, and
were passed by the filaments in nine turns. The draw rolls had a
surface speed of 2,180 meters per minute and were passed by the
filaments in 14 turns. To effect some relaxation, the filaments
were wound up at a speed of 2,002 meters per minute, i.e., at a
speed slightly less than the speed of the draw rolls. The drawn
filaments had a total denier of 250/48.
When the feed roll temperature was 68.degree. C, the filaments
obtained had poor uniformity and showed a bottleneck structure.
Fabrics made from such incompletely drawn filaments showed streaks
and were irregularly dyed. Feed roll temperatures above 135.degree.
C produced filaments of substantially decreased tenacity, and at
still higher temperatures, the filaments began to stick to the feed
rolls.
Table 2 shows the filament properties at different temperatures of
the draw rolls:
TABLE 2
Break Draw Roll Tenacity Elonga- Shrinkage Temperature (.degree.C)
g/denier tion (%) % at 165.degree. C in Air
__________________________________________________________________________
180 7.9 18 3.5 200 7.8 19 2.3 225 7.9 18 1.6
__________________________________________________________________________
Table 2 shows that, at increased draw roll temperature, the
tenacity and elongation of the filaments remain substantially
constant, while their shrinkage is reduced. Such low-denier,
low-shrinking filaments are, for example, suitable for making
sewing threads. At draw roll temperatures below 180.degree. C, the
filaments obtained had a considerably lower tenacity.
EXAMPLE III
The filaments were spun and drawn as described in Example I, with
the following differences: A polymer of higher viscosity was used,
so that the spun undrawn filaments had an intrinsic viscosity of
0.95. At a surface speed of the feed rolls of 365 meters per
minute, the birefringence of the spun filaments was 1.0 .times.
10.sup.-.sup.3. By variation of the speed of the feed rolls,
various draw ratios were obtained, while the surface speed of the
draw rolls was kept constant at 2,160 meters per minute. To effect
some relaxation, the filaments were wound up at a speed of 2,000
meters per minute, i.e., at a speed slightly less than the speed of
the draw rolls. The total denier of the drawn filaments was
1,000/192.
Table 3 shows the filament properties at various draw ratios:
TABLE 3
Tenacity Elongation Draw Ratio (g/denier) (%)
__________________________________________________________________________
5.9 8.8 16 6.0 9.0 15 6.1 9.1 14.5 6.2 9.2 14
__________________________________________________________________________
As can be seen in comparison with Example I, Table 1, the higher
filament viscosity reduces the upper limit of the draw ratio
obtainable, but permits, at equal draw ratios, to obtain filaments
of higher tenacities. The filaments are partially shrunk and are
suitable for making tire cord yarn.
EXAMPLE IV
This example describes the use of an additional pretension roll
system between spinnerette and feed rolls and the use of additional
relaxation rolls between draw rolls and windup device. The example
further shows the working of the inventive process at different
speeds.
The filaments were spun and drawn as described in Example I with
the following differences: A polymer of higher viscosity was used,
so that the spun undrawn filaments had an intrinsic viscosity of
about 0.92. The filaments were withdrawn from a spinnerette of 192
holes by means of an unheated motor-driven roll and separator roll,
serving as pre-tension rolls and placed between spinnerette and
feed rolls. From the draw rolls the filaments passed over another
two motor-driven rolls heated to a higher temperature than the draw
rolls and serving for the purpose of relaxation and stabilization.
The axes of the two pre-tension rolls and the two relaxation rolls
are skew set.
The feed and draw rolls had a surface roughness as roll surface
type E of Example V. The diameter of the motor-driven pre-tension
roll was such that its surface speed was about 1.5 percent lower
than the surface speed of the feed rolls. As explained above, this
speed difference produces some tension of the filaments which is
well within their range of reversible elastic elongation and
prevents undesired sideway movements of the filaments on the feed
rolls as described in Example I.
Filaments were spun and drawn at different speeds of the rolls. The
rate of polymer extruded through the spinnerette was so adjusted
that, in all cases, the filaments finally obtained had a total
denier of 1,000/192. Table 4 shows the surface temperature of the
heated rolls, the number of turns around each roll system, and the
speed of the rolls:
TABLE 4
Surface Speed in Meters Per Minute Number Rolls Temp. of turns A B
C
__________________________________________________________________________
Feed Rolls 90.degree. C 5 358 465 550 Draw Rolls 220.degree. C 11
2160 2690 2900 Relaxation Rolls 235.degree. C 8 2000 2500 2695
Wind-Up Roll 2002 2503 2700
__________________________________________________________________________
The heating of the relaxation rolls results in the filaments being
wound-up in a rather hot condition, which decreases their initial
modulus and produces a stable build-up of the yarn package.
Table 4a compares the withdrawal speed and birefringence of the
spun filaments with the draw-ratio, tenacity, and break elongation
of the drawn filaments:
TABLE 4a
Spun Filaments Drawn Filaments withdrawal Tenacity Break Speed
Birefri- Draw g/denier Elonga- (m/min) ngence Ratio tion (%)
__________________________________________________________________________
A 358 1.5.times. 10.sup.-.sup.3 6.0 8.9 15 B 465 2.2.times.
10.sup.-.sup.3 5.6 9.1 14 C 550 3.2.times. 10.sup.-3 5.3 9.0 15
__________________________________________________________________________
table 4a shows that the birefringence of the spun, undrawn
filaments depends on their withdrawal speed. The filaments spun at
a higher speed have a higher orientation and therefore a higher
birefringence. Table 4a also shows that the higher spin-oriented
filaments withdrawn at higher speed and drawn at a draw-ratio of
5.3 and lower spin-oriented filaments withdrawn at a lower speed
and drawn at a draw-ratio of 6.0 produce drawn filaments of about
the same tenacity of about 9 grams per denier and the same
elongation at break of about 15 percent.
Table 4b compares filaments spun and drawn according to A in Table
4a, but with and without the use of a pre-tension roll:
TABLE 4b
Filament Number of Filament Sideway Tension Turns around Feed
Movements of before contact Rolls Required for the Filaments on the
of feed rolls Satisfactory Run Feed Rolls
__________________________________________________________________________
with pre- Tension 0.16 g/denier 5 .+-. 0.5 mm Roll Without 0.04
g/denier 8 .+-. 4.0 mm Pre- Tension Roll
__________________________________________________________________________
As Table 4b shows, the filaments spun with the use of pre-tension
rolls had a considerably higher tension than the filaments spun
without such rolls. As a result of this tension, the filaments are
in closer contact with the feed rolls and show considerably less
sideway movements than the filaments spun without pre-tension roll.
As a further result of the closer contact, the pre-tensioned
filaments are heated more rapidly and therefore require fewer turns
than the un-tensioned filaments. Thus, as Table 4b shows, the
tensioned filaments needed only five turns around the feed rolls,
while the un-tensioned filaments required eight turns to obtain a
satisfactory run.
EXAMPLE V
This example describes how the nature of the surface of the feed
and draw rolls affects the performance of the process and the
qualities of the filaments obtained. Filaments were spun and drawn
as described in Example IV, selecting the following roll surface
speeds: Draw rolls -- 2,160 m/min., relaxation rolls -- 2,000
m/min., and wind-up roll -- 2,002 m/min. The draw ratio was varied
by variation of the surface speed of the feed rolls. The surface
speed of the pre-tension rolls was about 1.5 percent lower than the
surface speed of the feed rolls. The temperature of the heated
rolls and the number of filament turns around the rolls were the
same as described in Example IV, Table 4. The drawn filaments had a
total denier of 1,000/192.
In comparing rolls of different surface roughness, the following
roughness terms, as defined in the Specification, were
determined:
Roughness Terms Prescribed Limits
__________________________________________________________________________
(1) Roughness height 0.5 - 2.2 microns (2) Roughness range 4.5 -
8.0 microns (3) Average roughness range 1.6 - 3.0 microns (4) Peak
distance Max. 140 microns (5) Average peak distance 40 - 60 microns
(6) Profile curvature Max. 0.030 microns.sup.-.sup.1
__________________________________________________________________________
Filaments were spun and drawn using rolls having a conventional
polished surface and rolls of different surface roughness complying
with all or any of the prescribed limits. For each type of roll
surface, the maximum possible draw ratio of the filaments was
determined, i.e., the draw ratio at which a correct drawing without
occurrence of filament stickiness or of filament fracture could be
accomplished.
Roll surface type A in Table 5 represents a conventional polished
roll, while surface types B to H represent surfaces of different
roughness, B being the smoothest and H the coarsest type. All rolls
of types B to H are within the limits prescribed as regards
roughness height (1), but only rolls of types E and F comply with
the prescribed limits of all the terms (1) to (6).
Table 5 shows the results of the measurements of the surface
roughness of the rolls used. Table 5a indicates, by + and - signs,
whether or not the various roll surface types complied with the
prescribed limits of the roughness terms, and Table 5b shows the
qualities of the corresponding drawn filaments obtained;
TABLE 5
Roll Roughness Terms surface (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) microns mic-
mic- mic- mic- microns.sup.-.sup.1 type rons rons rons rons
__________________________________________________________________________
A Polished 0.04 0.2 -- -- -- -- B Too smooth 0.53 4.0 1.3 130 47
0.022 C Too smooth 0.58 4.0 1.5 110 44 0.021 D Too smooth 0.65 4.5
1.5 140 59 0.018 E satisfactory 0.78 5.6 2.1 110 55 0.026 F
satisfactory 0.69 4.7 1.6 120 45 0.024 G Too coarse 1.85 13 4.8 160
70 0.032 H Too coarse 1.77 11 4.8 180 78 0.031
__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 5a
Roll Surface Roughness Terms Type (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
__________________________________________________________________________
A - - B + - - + + + C + - - + + + D + + - + + + E + + + + + + F + +
+ + + + G + + + - - - H + + + - - -
__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 5b
Roll Drawn Filaments Surface Maximum Draw Tenacity Elonga- Type
Description Ratio g/denier tion (%)
__________________________________________________________________________
A Polished -- -- -- B Too smooth 5.8 8.4 16 C Too smooth 5.9 8.5 15
D Too smooth 6.0 8.8 14.5 E Satisfactory 6.4 9.2 14.5 F
Satisfactory 6.5 9.3 14 G Too coarse 6.4 8.2 12 H Too coarse 6.2
8.2 13.5
__________________________________________________________________________
With polished rolls (A), the filaments could not be drawn at all,
because they became sticky and adhered to the draw rolls. Rolls
(B), (C), and (D) had a surface which was still too smooth to allow
such slipping as to effect a sufficient preliminary drawing of the
filaments when passing over the feed rolls. As a result, the
maximum possible draw ratio of the filaments was substantially
below the draw ratio obtained with satisfactory rolls (E) and (F).
When it was tried to apply higher draw ratios, the filaments became
sticky when contacting the draw rolls and were wrapped around
them.
With rolls (G) and (H) having a surface which was too coarse, the
filaments were partially damaged. This is shown by the fact that
their tenacity and their elongation are substantially lower than
the tenacity and their elongation are substantially lower than the
tenacity and elongation of satisfactory filaments (E) and (F) drawn
at about the same draw ratio. Rolls (E) and (F) having a surface
roughness complying with all prescribed limits, produced very
satisfactory filaments which showed no stickiness and which were
not damaged. At a draw ratio of 6.4 - 6.5 these filaments had a
high tenacity of 9.2 - 9.3 grams per denier and an elongation of
about 14 percent.
EXAMPLE VI
This example describes the effects of the composition of the
lubricating finish. Filaments were spun as described in Example V
with roll surface (F), but varying the draw ratio of the filaments
by variation of the speed of the feed rolls. The following
lubricating finishes were used:
a. Neutral emulsion of a mixture of an ethoxylated fatty acid ester
and a sulphonated fatty alcohol, the emulsion containing 75 percent
by weight of water.
b. Conventional emulsion of a mixture of 40 percent emulsifying,
antistatic, and sizing agents and 60 percent mineral oil, the
emulsion containing 80 percent by weight of water.
c. Finish as (b), but containing 15% by weight of water.
d. Water-insoluble ethylene glycol derivate.
e. Lubricating finish based on isooctyl stearate, containing 5 - 7
percent by weight of water.
f. Mixture of equal parts by weight of (d) and (e), containing 2.5
- 3.5 percent by weight of water.
g. Ready-made mixture of isooctyl stearate and an ethoxylated
emulsifying agent, containing 2 - 5 percent by weight of water.
Table 6 shows the results of the tests. The temperature indicated
is the temperature of the finish as applied to the filaments. The
content of finish in the filaments was determined by extraction and
refers to water-free finish.
TABLE 6
Con- tent in Finish fil- Filaments ame- draw Water nts rat-
Tenacity Elonga- Type Content Temp. % tio g/denier tion (%)
__________________________________________________________________________
a 73% 25.degree. C 0.7 5.0 4.1 28 b 80% 25.degree. C 0.9 5.2 4.1 30
c 15% 60.degree. C 1.2 5.4 6.0 16 d -- 40.degree. C 1.1 6.0 8.2 16
e 6% 80.degree. C 0.6 6.0 8.8 15 f 3% 80.degree. C 0.9 6.0 8.5 15 g
4% 30.degree. C 0.3 6.0 8.8 15
__________________________________________________________________________
the draw ratio indicated for finishes (a), (b), and (c), containing
more than 10 percent of water, is the maximum draw ratio at which
filaments could still be spun and drawn. As Table 5 shows, this
draw ratio is substantially lower than the draw ratio obtainable
with finishes (d), (e), (f), and (g) the water content of which did
not exceed 10 percent as prescribed. Accordingly, the tenacities of
8.2 - 8.8 grams per denier of the filaments prepared with the
preferred lubricating finish considerably exceed the tenacities of
4.1 - 6.0 grams per denier of the filaments made with finishes of a
high water content.
The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms
without departing from the spirit or essential attributes thereof
and, accordingly, reference should be made to the appended claims,
rather than to the foregoing specification as indicating the scope
of the invention.
* * * * *