U.S. patent number 3,709,580 [Application Number 05/125,665] was granted by the patent office on 1973-01-09 for extended range polarization target.
This patent grant is currently assigned to The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy. Invention is credited to Ronald B. Fugitt, Paul J. Heckman, Jr..
United States Patent |
3,709,580 |
Fugitt , et al. |
January 9, 1973 |
EXTENDED RANGE POLARIZATION TARGET
Abstract
A reflector, particularly useful for underwater use, comprising
a base maial having angled surfaces for retro-reflecting an
incident beam of light back substantially parallel to the incident
beam, and means for polarizing the reflected beam into the same
circular polarization handedness as the incident beam.
Inventors: |
Fugitt; Ronald B. (San Diego,
CA), Heckman, Jr.; Paul J. (Rancho Santa Fe, CA) |
Assignee: |
The United States of America as
represented by the Secretary of the Navy (N/A)
|
Family
ID: |
22420831 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/125,665 |
Filed: |
March 18, 1971 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
359/488.01;
359/489.07 |
Current CPC
Class: |
G02B
23/22 (20130101); G02B 27/28 (20130101); G02B
27/281 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
G02B
27/28 (20060101); G02b 005/30 () |
Field of
Search: |
;350/147,152,156,157,102,105,109 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
876,555 |
|
Nov 1942 |
|
FR |
|
1,464,475 |
|
Nov 1966 |
|
FR |
|
Primary Examiner: Schonberg; David
Assistant Examiner: Miller; Paul R.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. a reflector, particularly useful for underwater use,
comprising:
a base material;
the base material having a single-reflection retro-reflective,
dimpled, surface, the dimples being in the range of 1.5mm deep,
with a radius of curvature of approximately 3.0mm, and spaced
approximately 6mm apart; and
a sheet of birefringent quarter-wave plate disposed upon the
dimpled surface.
2. A reflector particularly useful for underwater use,
comprising:
a plastic substrate;
a plurality of transparent glass, microscopic, spheres imbedded in
the substrate;
the surfaces of intersection of the spheres and the substrate
forming a reflective surface; and
a sheet of birefringent quarter-wave plate disposed upon, or
adjacent to, the imbedded spheres, parallel to the substrate.
Description
STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENT INTEREST
The invention described herein may be manufactured and used by or
for the Government of the United States of America for governmental
purposes without the payment of any royalties thereon or
therefor.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to an apparatus and method for an underwater
viewing system wherein much backscattered and sidescattered light
is present. When artificial lighting is used underwater, the
visibility is often severely limited by light which is scattered
from particulate matter and microorganisms in the water back toward
the observer or photo-optical receiver. Attempts to reduce the
effects of this backscattered light have resulted in investigations
into such advanced viewing systems as volume scanning, range
gating, and polarization discrimination. Of these advanced systems,
polarization discrimination is the easiest to implement.
A polarization discrimination system uses a right circularly
polarized (RCP) source of illumination and a right circular
analyzer. The backscattered light will in general be left
circularly polarized (LCP), and as such will be blocked by the
right circular analyzer. The light which returns from most
underwater targets will be unpolarized, however, and a portion will
be transmitted by the analyzer.
One problem encountered with the polarization discrimination system
is the absorption of unpolarized target light. Since it is
necessary to eliminate the polarized backscatter, at least half of
the unpolarized target light will also be absorbed. With available
analyzers the absorption is approximately 63 to 77 percent of the
incident value. The output power of the light source could be
increased to compensate for this loss, but the additional power
drain would be a disadvantage for use on underwater vehicles which
have limited energy supplies.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to an apparatus and method for viewing a
target area, generally underwater, which permits viewing or
otherwise optically detecting the target at ranges which exceed
those possible by using presently available targets. The apparatus
includes a source of circularly-polarized light for illuminating
the target area; a target, at least some portion of which has a
retro-reflective surface; a birefringent quarter-wave plate
covering the retro-reflective surface of the target; and a circular
polarization plate positioned between the viewing lens and the
light reflected from the target. The arrangement permits the
transmission through the polarization sheet, or polarization plate,
of light reflected from the retro-reflective surface which has the
same handedness as the light produced by the source.
Since the target will return RCP light rather than unpolarized
light, when illuminated with RCP light, approximately twice as much
target light will be transmitted by the polarization analyzer. The
polarization target will thus appear brighter than conventional
targets and can be detected at greater ranges. Since this type of
target also redirects a higher percentage of incident light back to
the observer, or photo-optical receiver, it will be brighter than
conventional targets even when polarization discrimination is not
used. Target materials of this type could be bonded to a variety of
underwater objects. Since these objects will be visible at greater
viewing ranges, they can be located easier than objects not bonded
with such materials.
STATEMENT OF THE OBJECTS OF INVENTION
An object of the invention is to provide a reflector material and
method for viewing underwater objects which permits more efficient
use of the source of light than prior art methods.
Another object of the invention is to provide a reflector material
and method suitable for use in an environment where much scattering
of reflected light is present.
Still another object is to provide a reflector material which, when
bonded or attached to an underwater target, permits locating the
target at much greater distances than targets not using this kind
of reflector surface.
Other objects, advantages and novel features of the invention will
become apparent from the following detailed description of the
invention, when considered in conjunction with the accompanying
drawings, wherein:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic view of a prior art circular polarization
technique for the elimination of backscatter.
FIG. 2 (A-E) is a set of cross-sectional diagrammatic views showing
the polarization characteristics of underwater targets for incident
circularly polarized light.
FIG. 3 is a diagrammatic view showing an experimental arrangement
for the measurement of parameters of target radiance.
FIG. 4 is a pair of graphs showing the transmission factor of
circular polarization analyzers for two different Polaroid
materials.
FIG. 5 (A-D) is a set of diagrammatic views showing qualitatively
the relative visibility of target returns with and without
polarization discrimination.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
One of the problems encountered in underwater viewing is the loss
of contrast due to the presence of backscattered light. It has been
shown that circular polarization discrimination techniques are
effective in some cases as a means of improving target visibility
or extending the viewing range.
FIG. 1 illustrates the main components of an extended range or
contrast improvement system 10 of the prior art which utilizes
circularly polarized light. A source of unpolarized light 12
propagates a beam of unpolarized light 14 through a right circular
polarizer 16, whereupon it becomes right circularly polarized (RCP)
light 18. The RCP light 18, after impinging upon the target 22,
becomes depolarized target light 24. There is also a considerable
amount of left circularly polarized (LCP) backscattered light 26
produced.
In many cases of underwater viewing, much of the backscattered
light 26 is due to single scattering by suspended particles and
micro-organisms in the water. If right circularly polarized RCP
light 18 is used for illumination, much of the backscattered light
26 is left circularly polarized LCP, and can thus be blocked with a
polarization analyzer, right circular analyzer 28. The light 24
returning from most underwater targets 22 is unpolarized, however,
and a portion of this target light is transmitted by the analyzer
28, to become polarized light 32 when it enters the detector
34.
The polarization discrimination system 10 shown in FIG. 1 has two
fundamental disadvantages. The first is absorption of initially
unpolarized source light 14 by the polarizer 16 (approximately 63
percent for Polaroid HNCP37), and the second is absorption of
returning target light 24 by the analyzer 28 (another 63
percent).
By using an improved type of polarizer 16, much of the power loss
caused by the initial polarization can be eliminated. The second
problem, absorption at the analyzer 28, is however, an inherent
feature of the polarization discrimination system 10. Since it is
necessary to eliminate polarized backscatter 26, at least half of
the unpolarized target light 24 will be absorbed.
If targets are designed to return RCP light rather than unpolarized
light, approximately twice as much of this target light will be
transmitted by a right circular polarization analyzer. If these
targets also re-direct a higher percentage of incident light back
toward the receiver, they will offer improved contrast and
increased viewing ranges even without the use of polarization
techniques.
In underwater viewing situations, targets can be classified as
uncooperative and cooperative. The former would represent the
situation wherein an object is to be found which has not been
treated for ease of optical detection e.g., enemy hardware, or the
treatment to which the object has been subjected has deteriorated.
A cooperative target would be one that is specially treated to
effect easy optical detection or recognition.
Referring now to FIG. 2, FIG. 2A shows what happens when RCP light
18 strikes an uncooperative, diffuse, target 22. The reflected
light 24 becomes depolarized.
Two different approaches have been taken to design targets which
return a large amount of RCP light to the receiver. The first
involves the use of a two-reflection retro-reflector 42 which
redirects incident light 18 back toward the receiver (not shown)
for a variety of target orientations, as shown in FIG. 2B. A
retro-reflector may be defined as a reflector wherein the
directions of the incident light and the reflected light are
approximately parallel. The polarization nature of this target 42
can be explained by resolving the incident RCP light beam 18 into
two linearly polarized component beams which have orthogonal
electric vectors oscillating at 90.degree. out of phase with each
other. For a single reflection from a metal 42 or metallic surface
at near-normal incidence, a phase shift of 180.degree. will occur
between these two component beams. Since they are originally out of
phase by 90.degree., this additional phase shift produces light
which is LCP 44. A second reflection at near-normal incidence
introduces another 180.degree. phase shift and the light becomes
RCP 46. Although the actual light beam 18 does not strike the
metallic surface of the retro-reflector 42 at normal incidence, it
can be shown that the approximation to 180.degree. phase shifts is
reasonably valid except for angles of large incidence. To provide
retroreflection characteristics in more than one plane, the actual
target 42 is an array of four-corner reflectors. The angles of the
target 42 in a plane perpendicular to that shown in FIG. 2B, would
generally be at 90.degree. also, as shown in FIG. 2E.
The second approach makes use of birefringent quarter-wave
materials and single reflections. One embodiment 50 includes a
target which consists of a quarter-wave plate 52 and a dimpled
metallic reflector 54, as shown in FIG. 2C. Typical dimpling would
consist of indentations one-sixteenth inch deep with a radius of
curvature of one-eighth inch, and spaced one-fourth inch apart in a
regular hexagonal pattern. The polarization nature of this target
50 can be explained by again resolving the incident RCP light 18
into two linearly polarized components which are 90.degree. out of
phase. The two-way path through the quarter-wave plate 52 produces
two 90.degree. phase shifts between these components, and one
180.degree. phase shift occurs when the light 18 is reflected at
near-normal incidence. Since the total phase shift produced by the
target 50 is 360.degree. (or 0.degree.), the returning light 46
will be RCP.
With respect to the type of light source to be used with the
reflector material of this invention, it need not be monochromatic,
although the quarter-wave plate 52 is more effective with this type
of light. For underwater use, a green light source is generally
used, and a laser light source would be particularly advantageous.
The dimpled surface of the reflector 54 has a semi-diffusing action
on the incident light 18 which allows the target 50 to be visible
from more than one viewing position. It should be pointed out that
the angle .theta., between the incident beam 18 and the reflected
beam 46,is exaggerated in this figure.
A target 60 which utilizes a quarter-wave plate 52 and a
"Scotchlite" reflective sheeting, retro-reflective, material 62 is
shown in FIG. 2D. "Scotchlite" reflective sheeting is a trademark
of, and manufactured by, the Minnesota Mining and Mfg. Co.,
Reflective Products Division, St. Paul, Minn. 55119. The
"Scotchlite" sheeting 62 is composed of microscopic glass spheres,
or beads, 64 of high refractive index which are partially imbedded
in a tough plastic reflective substrate 66. The incident light 18
passes through the quarter-wave plate 52, is focused onto the
reflecting substrate 66 by the spheres 64, and returns back through
the quarter-wave plate in a direction approximately parallel to the
incident beam. Although the polarization characteristics are the
same as for the previously described model, embodiment 50 of FIG.
2C, this target 60 is much more efficient due to its more complete
retro-reflective action.
Referring now to FIG. 3, the measured target radiance is given
by
N .congruent. H.sub.i T (.xi.) .rho. (.theta..sub.1 .theta..sub.2,
.phi.) e.sup.-.sup..alpha..sup.r (1)
where H.sub.i is the irradiance incident on the target, .rho. is
the reflection distribution function, .alpha. is the volume
attenuation coefficient of the medium, and r is the distance from
the target to the receiver. If the viewing system employs circular
polarization discrimination, the transmission factor of the
analyzer is given by T (.xi.), where .xi. is the degree of circular
polarization for the returning target light. If polarization
techniques are not used, T(.xi.) is equal to unity.
The degree of circular polarization may be defined operationally as
follows: A beam containing a mixture of unpolarized and circularly
polarized (CP) light is passed through a birefringent quarter-wave
plate and a linear analyzer. The quarter-wave plate converts any CP
light to linearly polarized light, but does not affect the
unpolarized light. By measuring the degree of linear polarization
for this beam we can thus obtain a measure of circular polarization
for the original beam. With the preceding arrangement, the degree
of circular polarization is given by
.xi. = .+-.[(H.sub.max - H.sub.min)/(H.sub.max - H.sub.min)],
(2)
where H.sub.max and H.sub.min are maximum and minimum values for
the irradiance which is transmitted by the linear analyzer as it is
rotated. This function ranges from zero for unpolarized light to
.+-.1 for completely circularly polarized light. To differentiate
between right and left circularly polarized light, RCP values are
considered to be positive and LCP values negative.
By measuring .xi. in this manner, it is not necessary to assume a
particular functional relationship between .xi. and T(.xi.), the
transmission of a circular analyzer. Once such transmission curves
are known, however, the degree of circular polarization is easily
determined by measuring T(.xi.).
Referring now to FIG. 3, equation 1 indicates that the measured
target radiance can be increased by increasing .rho.(.theta..sub.1,
.theta..sub.2, .phi.) for values of .theta..sub.1, .theta..sub.2
and .phi., which are commonly used with underwater viewing systems.
If circular polarization techniques are being used, then T(.xi.)
should also be as high as possible.
The transmission characteristics of Polaroid HNCP37 and HGCP21
analyzers were measured as a function of degree of circular
polarization for the incident light. These curves, shown in FIG. 4,
indicate that T(.xi.), and thus the measured target radiance, is a
linear function of the degree of circular polarization. The
empirical equations which represent these curves are:
T(.xi.) = 0.36 .xi. + 0.37 (HNCP37), (3)
and
T(.xi.) = 0.23 .xi. + 0.23 (HGCP21). (4)
From Eqs. 3 and 4, we have
.xi. = [T(.xi.)/T(.xi. = 0)] - 1 . (5)
It may be shown that .xi., as determined by this method, is
identical to the fourth normalized Stokes parameter.
Qualitative and quantitative investigations were performed to
compare the efficiencies of several underwater targets.
Qualitative representations of photographs of various targets are
shown in FIG. 5. The source-receiver separation angle .theta..sub.1
was fixed at approximately 10.degree. (see FIG. 3), and identical
exposure times and aperture settings were used for all three
photographs. Circular polarization discrimination was effected by
placing a Polaroid HGCP21 circular analyzer in front of the camera
lens. From this figure several qualitative observations can be
made. When circular polarization discrimination is used:
1. RCP light which undergoes a single reflection is effectively
blocked by the analyzer. A single reflection at near-normal
incidence produces a 180.degree. phase shift between orthogonally
polarized components, and thus converts RCP light to LCP light. See
FIG. 2B.
2. the brightness of a typical white diffuse target, target 2, is
considerably reduced.
3. Ordinary Scotchlite, target 3, is no brighter than the white
diffuse target, target 2.
4. The brightness of a dimpled reflector, target 1, is considerably
improved by covering it with a quarter-wave birefringent plate,
target 4. For .theta..sub.2 > 0, however, this combination is
not as bright as the white diffuse target, target 2. Refer to FIG.
3 for a definition of .theta..sub.2, the polar orientation
angle.
5. Return from the two-reflection retro-reflector, target 5, is
excellent for .theta..sub.2 = 0, but rapidly decreases as
.theta..sub.2 increases.
6. The Scotchlite and quarter-wave plate combination, target 6, is
considerably brighter than the white diffuse target, target 2. This
brightness does not significantly decrease as .theta..sub.2
increases.
To determine the contrast improvement or range increase obtained by
using improved targets, it was necessary to measure quantitatively
the target radiances as a function of the source-receiver
separation angle .theta..sub.1, and the polar orientation angle
.theta..sub.2. See FIG. 3. Specification of an azimuthal
orientation angle .phi. is only necessary for the two reflection
retro-reflector shown in FIG. 2E, since the other targets possess
azimuthal symmetry. For this target, .phi. is arbitrarily set equal
to zero when two sides of the rectangular retro-reflector array
(FIG. 5) are parallel (or perpendicular) to the plane of
incidence.
Measurements were taken for four targets which, for simplicity, are
designated by the letters A, B, C, and D as follows, in accordance
with the designations shown in FIG. 2:
A -- white diffuse target,
B -- two reflection retro-reflector,
C -- dimpled reflector and quarter-wave plate,
D -- scotchlite sheeting and quarter-wave plate.
The range of each of these targets was fixed at approximately 4.2
meters, and relative radiance was measured with a Gamma Scientific
model 2,000 telephotometer. The illuminating source was circularly
polarized by use of HGCP21 Polaroid, and polarization
discrimination was effected by placing an HNCP37 Polaroid analyzer
over the telephotometer lens.
The relative radiance of these targets was measured both with and
without polarization discrimination for values of .theta..sub.2
between 0.degree. and 50.degree., and values of .theta..sub.1
between 1.74.degree. and 10.degree.. For a linear source-receiver
separation distance of 20 inches, this range of values for
.theta..sub.1 corresponds to a range of viewing distances between
16.7 meters (.theta..sub.1 = 1.74.degree.) and 2.9 meters
(.theta..sub.1 = 10.degree.).
It was determined that targets D, Scotchlite and quarter-wave
plate; B, two reflection retro-reflector; and C, dimpled reflector
and quarter-wave plate; were all brighter than target A, white
diffuse target, for small polar orientation angles. It was also
determined that for a given target orientation, that is, for fixed
values of .theta..sub.1, .theta..sub.2 and .theta., the improvement
is generally greater with polarization discrimination than it is
without it.
For many orientation and separation angles, however, two of these
targets, B and C, are less bright than target A. When polarization
discrimination is not used, target C is brighter than target A only
for values of .theta..sub.2 which range from zero to approximately
10.degree.. When polarization discrimination is used, this range
increases to approximately 15.degree.. When .theta. = 0, target B
is brighter than target A for values of .theta..sub.2 up to
approximately 25.degree.. When polarization discrimination is not
being used, there is also a large increase in radiance for
.theta..sub.2 .congruent. 45.degree..
From FIG. 2B it can be seen that when .theta..sub.2 = 45.degree.,
the bisector of .theta..sub.1 will be normal to one set of
reflecting facets on the target, and light will return to the
receiver after being singly reflected. Since RCP light becomes LCP
when it is singly reflected at near-normal incidence, much lower
radiance values are obtained for .theta..sub.2 .congruent.
45.degree. when polarization discrimination is employed. If .phi.
is not equal to zero (or multiples of 90.degree.), the measured
radiance of target B is greatly reduced since twice-reflected light
does not return to the receiver. It can also be shown that with
.phi. = 45.degree., the measured radiance of this target very
rapidly drops below that of target A as .theta..sub.2 is
increased.
The most significant improvement was obtained with target D,
Scotchlite and quarter-wave plate. This target was brighter than
any of the others for a wide variety of target orientations. Due to
its retro-reflecting characteristics, the improvement is most
pronounced for small source-receiver separation angles (long
ranges), and decreases as this angle increases.
Measurement of the effect of polarization discrimination on the
measured radiance of targets A and D show that approximately 71
percent of the light returning from target D is transmitted by an
HNCP37 analyzer. For target A, approximately 37 percent of the
returning light passes through the analyzer.
By referring to the T(.xi.) versus .xi. curve for HNCP37 Polaroid
shown in FIG. 4, it can be seen that the light returning from
target D is almost completely RCP, and that returning from target A
is unpolarized. These polarization characteristics are largely
independent of the source-receiver separation and the polar
orientation angle.
In summary, quantitative radiance measurements have been made for
three newly developed targets, targets B, C, and D of FIG. 2, and
for one white diffuse comparison target, target A. These
measurements indicate that significant range increases are possible
when one of these targets, target D, Scotchlite and quarter-wave
plate, is used with either a conventional viewing system or with
one which employs polarization techniques to discriminate against
backscatter.
For source-receiver separation angles between 1.74.degree. and
10.degree., the radiance of this target D was between 1.79 and 33.2
times that of the comparison target, target A. The calculated range
increases afforded by using this target are between 0.5 and 1.5
attenuation lengths. The specific radiance improvement factor, and
associated range increase, for a particular viewing system depends
on whether or not polarization discrimination is employed and on
the source-receiver separation angles involved. In general, greater
radiance improvements are obtained when polarization techniques are
employed, and when source-receiver separation angles are small.
If a target is constructed from Scotchlite and very thin, flexible
quarter-wave material, it could be bonded to a variety of
underwater objects, such as, test torpedoes, diver marking aids,
tools, diver's suits, underwater habitats, etc. These objects would
then be visible at greater viewing ranges, and could be more easily
located.
Obviously many modifications and variations of the present
invention are possible in the light of the above teachings. It is
therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended
claims the invention may be practiced otherwise than as
specifically described.
* * * * *