Electrostatic Precipitator System

Gourdine , et al. December 5, 1

Patent Grant 3704572

U.S. patent number 3,704,572 [Application Number 05/037,714] was granted by the patent office on 1972-12-05 for electrostatic precipitator system. This patent grant is currently assigned to Gourdine Systems, Inc.. Invention is credited to Meredith C. Gourdine, Howard A. Sayers.


United States Patent 3,704,572
Gourdine ,   et al. December 5, 1972

ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR SYSTEM

Abstract

An improved electrostatic precipitator device capable of significant size reduction having flat parallel plates consisting of an ionizing corona discharge portion as a unitary structure which is utilized to effectuate precipitation of entrained particles from an air stream onto the surface of a plurality of associated collection members, as an air stream containing entrained particles is cleaned in passing through the precipitator device. The ionizer discharge portion of the unitary structure comprises a plurality of substantially uniformly spaced apart sharp electrical conductive protrusions directed to alternate sides of the unitary structure; thereby forming a uniform ionization region with a parallel portion of the collector extending the full length of the ionizer. The remainder of each of the unitary structure functions as a passive electrode which cooperates with the remaining portion of the collector to form highly concentrated electrostatic fields therebetween for enhanced collection efficiency with minimum re-entrainment of the particles to be collected.


Inventors: Gourdine; Meredith C. (West Orange, NJ), Sayers; Howard A. (Clifton, NJ)
Assignee: Gourdine Systems, Inc. (Livingston, NJ)
Family ID: 21895886
Appl. No.: 05/037,714
Filed: May 15, 1970

Current U.S. Class: 96/58
Current CPC Class: B03C 3/12 (20130101)
Current International Class: B03C 3/12 (20060101); B03C 3/04 (20060101); B03c 003/01 ()
Field of Search: ;55/136,137,138,139,142,143,145,154,150,152,124,126,146

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
1888606 November 1932 Nesbit
2255677 September 1941 Penney
2275001 March 1942 Anderson
2490979 December 1949 Palmer
2969127 January 1961 Cook
3172747 March 1965 Nodolf
3191362 June 1965 Bourgeois
3271932 September 1966 Newell
3412530 November 1968 Cardiff
3422600 January 1969 Chamberlain
3511030 May 1970 Hall et al.
3540191 November 1970 Herman
Foreign Patent Documents
611,137 Oct 1948 GB
627,068 Jul 1949 GB
Primary Examiner: Talbert, Jr.; Dennis E.

Claims



What is claimed is:

1. An electrostatic precipitator for removing particles entrained in a fluid stream comprising;

a housing having a fluid inlet and a fluid outlet and forming therebetween a flow path for the fluid stream;

at least one plate electrode member positioned transversely of the flow path and extending in a direction generally parallel to the direction of flow from an upstream end adjacent the fluid inlet to a downstream end adjacent the fluid outlet;

a plurality of pointed members spaced along the upstream end of each plate electrode member and extending upstream therefrom at an acute angle to the longitudinal centerline of the electrode member, said pointed members being symmetrically disposed on opposite sides of said longitudinal centerline;

a plate collector electrode positioned on either side of each plate electrode member in generally parallel relation thereto, each collector electrode having an upstream end located upstream of the pointed members of the adjacent plate electrode member and a downstream end located adjacent the downstream end of said plate electrode member; and

means for establishing a potential difference between each plate electrode member and the adjacent collector electrodes productive of (1) a corona discharge between each pointed member and the opposed region of each collector electrode that is directed in substantial part against the direction of flow and (2) a nondischarging precipitation field between the region of each plate electrode member downstream of the pointed members and the opposed region of each collector electrode.

2. An electrostatic precipitator as defined in claim 1 wherein a plurality of said plate electrode members are positioned within the flow path in spaced-apart generally parallel relation, and said plurality of electrode members are connected together at one edge thereof to form a first unitary plate assembly in parallel array.

3. An electrostatic precipitator as defined in claim 2 wherein the collector electrodes positioned on opposite sides of said plate electrode members are connected together at one edge thereof to form a second unitary plate assembly in parallel array.

4. An electrostatic precipitator as defined in claim 3 wherein said potential difference establishing means includes means for electrically grounding said collector electrodes and means for applying a negative potential to said plate electrode members.

5. An electrostatic precipitator as defined in claim 1 further comprising sump means for receiving and storing particles precipitated from the fluid stream.

6. An electrostatic precipitator as defined in claim 5 wherein each plate electrode member and collector electrode is vertically disposed within the housing; and

the housing further includes a member forming a lower boundary for the flow path, said member having formed therein a plurality of apertures, and sump means positioned below said member for receiving therethrough particles precipitated from the fluid stream.

7. An electrostatic precipitator as defined in claim 6 wherein the collector electrodes are supported in parallel spaced relation to the associated plate electrode members by the lower boundary forming member.

8. An electrostatic precipitator as defined in claim 6 wherein:

a plurality of plate electrode members are positioned within the flow path;

said plurality of electrode members are connected together at their upper edges so as to form a first unitary plate assembly in parallel array; and

the collector electrodes associated with said plurality of plate electrode members are connected together at their lower edges by the lower boundary forming member so as to form a second unitary plate assembly in parallel array, the plates of the first and second assemblies being interleaved.

9. An electrostatic precipitator as defined in claim 1 wherein the upstream ends of said pointed members extend outward of the sides of the associated plate electrode member so as to be positioned closer to the adjacent collector electrodes than any other part of the electrode member.

10. An electrostatic precipitator as defined in claim 1 wherein alternately spaced ones of said pointed members are disposed on opposite sides of the longitudinal centerline of the electrode member.

11. An air cleaning system for treating environmental air in a building enclosure, including means for flowing the environmental air through the system, a mechanical air filter at an upstream location within the system and an electrostatic precipitator for electrostatically removing particulates from the air at a downstream location within the system, wherein the improvement comprises;

at least one plate electrode member positioned within the precipitator to extend from a upstream end adjacent the precipitator inlet in a direction generally parallel to the direction of flow to a downstream end adjacent the precipitator outlet, said upstream and downstream ends of each plate electrode member thereby extending transversely of the direction of flow;

a plurality of pointed members spaced along the upstream end of each plate electrode member and extending upstream therefrom at an acute angle to the longitudinal centerline of the electrode member, said pointed members being symmetrically disposed on opposite sides of said longitudinal centerline;

a plate collector electrode positioned on either side of each electrode member in generally parallel relation thereto and having an upstream end located upstream of the pointed members of the adjacent electrode member and a downstream end adjacent the downstream end of said electrode member; and

means for establishing a potential difference between each electrode member and the adjacent collector electrodes productive of (1) a corona discharge between each pointed member and the opposed region of each collector electrode that is directed in substantial part against the direction of flow and (2) a nondischarging precipitation field between the region of each electrode member downstream of the pointed members and the opposed region of each collector electrode.

12. An electrostatic precipitator as defined in claim 11 wherein said potential difference establishing means and said means for passing air through the system are independently energizable.
Description



BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In the prior art, electrostatic precipitators for the removal of entrained particles from air streams have employed upstream ionizer chambers in which the particles entrained in the air stream are electrostatically charged, followed by one or more separate downstream collection chambers containing collector plates upon which the charged particles are precipitated during the air cleaning process. The ionizer electrodes most widely and usually used for such precipitators consist of a plurality of very fine (small-diameter) wires, spaced-apart and spaced between relatively widely spaced non-discharging electrodes, commonly known as attractor electrodes. The non-discharging attractor electrodes have been either curved towards or away from the wires, or substantially flat, plate surfaces. In many cases, the flat plates are preferred for the non-discharge electrodes, since they are simpler, less expensive and easier to assemble and clean.

Still other arrangements have been employed, which utilize parallel plates in the collection region of the precipitator having polarities of appropriate sign to adjacent plates. Such typical arrangements are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,662,608 and 3,181,285. In both of these referenced patents, the ionization region for charging particles entrained in an incoming air stream is separated from the collection region, which consists of a plurality of collector electrodes disposed in the path of the air stream with opposite polarities imposed upon adjacent collector electrodes. The primary distinction between the devices in the cited references is the arrangements in the ionizer. In U.S. Pat. No. 2,662,608, the ionizer includes a series of longitudily strung fine wires, while in U.S. Pat. No. 3,181,285, the ionizer is a single steel needle element positioned on the center line of the air inlet tube which functions as the attractor electrode.

The present invention overcomes several obvious disadvantages of the prior art arrangements, one of which arises from the fact that the ionization regions and the precipitation (collection) regions are in separate chambers. Another disadvantage occurs as a result of the charged particles precipitating out onto the surrounding walls of the attractor electrode, that is, the walls of the attractor electrode adjacent to the ionizer electrode in areas which are not accessible for cleaning. Precipitation of particles on the attractor walls in the ionizer section tends to reduce the ionization level in the ionizer region, which in turn, reduces the effectiveness and efficiency for charging the entrained particles in the air stream. In addition, owing to the non-uniform distribution of precipitated particles onto the walls of the attractor, the uniformity of corona discharge along the length of the corona wires will be non-uniform, which in turn, leads to non-uniformity of charge imparted to the particles.

Still another disadvantage arises from the discovery that when the precipitator device is constructed with rather narrow spacing between the corona wires and the attractor electrode, significant electrical arcing or shorting between the two electrodes may occur from the non-uniform deposition of particles on the attractor walls or from being deposited on the corona wires. The occurrence of such arcing substantially reduces the efficiency of operation and, in many cases, when continuous shorting occurs, it may cause the precipitator to become totally inoperative.

Another disadvantage of having the ionizer and the collection chambers separated, as is the case in the prior art, arises from the fact that there is a difference in electric field patterns in the "transition region" between the ionizer region and the upstream end of the collector electrodes. In various cases the electrodes in the collector region may have polarities or potentials different from that of the ionizer electrodes. Such differences may tend to create electric field conditions in the "transition region," which may often cause the charged particles to act in an undesirable and unpredictable manner, and thereby cause non-uniformity of collection in the specific regions designated for such collection. The exact nature of these undesirable effects are not clearly understood; however, the adverse effects of their occurrences have been observed and have been found to be objectionable for the manufacture of commercially acceptable and reliable apparatus.

Still another apparent disadvantage of the prior art arrangement of having the ionizer and collection chamber separated arises from the fact that such arrangements may cause the precipitator to be larger in size than may be desired or required to handle a pre-selected volume of air to be cleaned. More specifically, in certain applications for example, in a home kitchen range hood air cleaner utilized for cleaning the air in a kitchen, which has become polluted from the cooking process, it has been found for many years to be uneconomical and also requires too much space in the kitchen area to make it feasible to employ such large size prior art precipitators as a means for removing such air pollutants as smoke, grease particles, and odor from the kitchen environmental air, solely because of the large physical size requirements for such purposes with prior art devices. In addition, it is well recognized that such two-stage systems are incapable of effectively removing both submicron smoke, grease particles, and odors in a single-unit. This is apparently so because the two-stage units are handicapped in not being able to adequately handle large size particles.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with the present invention, the air cleaning precipitator device is constructed such that the ionization and the collector regions comprise what may be termed as a "continuous system," without a "transition region" between such functional chambers. More specifically, in one embodiment of the present invention the precipitator comprises at least one unitary substantially flat plate member, essentially consisting of an ionizer electrode section, extending toward the upstream end of the precipitator and a passive electrode section, extending from the ionizer section toward the downstream end of the precipitator. For each unitary plate member there is positioned on opposite sides thereof a substantially parallel and co-extensive collector electrode, having an upstream portion thereof which extends past the ionizer electrode on opposite sides thereof in the direction opposite to the incoming air stream. In the region between the upstream end of the collector electrodes, adjacent to the ionizer there is formed a corona discharge, whereby the entrained particles in the air stream are charged.

The ionizer and passive electrodes are at the same electrical potential with respect to ground and polarity, while the collector electrodes are at a different electrical potential with respect to ground and polarity than the corona and passive electrodes. In many instances the collector electrodes are at ground potential. These differences in polarities and potential cause a corona discharge and electrostatic fields to be formed, respectively, between the ionizer and the upstream end of the collector and between the passive electrode and the remainder of the collector for enchanced collection efficiency and to substantially reduce particle re-entrainment.

In addition, it has been found that precipitators operated and constructed in accordance with the present invention are capable of precipitating particles of both large and small (submicron) sizes, produced during the process of cooking foods. Still further, it has been observed by olfactory or smelling tests, that the odor levels produced during cooking processes are significantly reduced. A complete understanding of these observations can not be readily explained; however, it is believed that the close proximity of the ionization and collection regions in the precipitator enables more efficient charging and collection of these large size particles or the agglomeration of small particles to which gaseous odor attach and are removed. This has not heretofore effectively been done.

A further explanation of the precipitation process is based upon the belief that the collection of both large and small particles is in part due to "turbulence" created in the ionizer region which is evidenced by an enhancement of the "corona wind" produced therein.

In another embodiment of the invention the unitary ionizer and passive collector electrodes are each constructed in the form of unitary structures in an interleaved manner. In the embodiment the combination ionizer and passive electrode structure is disposed within the precipitator in a fashion so as to avoid possible collection of particles thereon and thereby reducing, if not eliminating, the occurrence of shorting out of the combined ionizer and passive electrode structural member.

Another important feature of the present invention arises from the fact that a precipitator device may be constructed in a significantly smaller-size volume unit, while still being capable of handling as large a volume of air to be cleaned of pollutants as that of the prior art two-chamber devices. Still further, the unitary combination structure for an ionizer and passive electrode is adaptable to multiple-stage arrangements in a minimum amount of space to add greater air cleaning efficiency.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The realization of the above features and advantages along with others of the invention will be apparent from the following description and the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1 is a schematic, illustrating the precipitator being utilized as a component of a ventilator precipitator system;

FIG. 2 is a diagramatic cross-section, illustrating a top view of an embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 3 is a diamgramatic cross-sectional view taken along line 3--3 of FIG. 2, illustrating a side view;

FIG. 4 is a diagramatic cross-sectional view taken along line 4--4 of FIG. 3, illustrating a back view;

FIG. 5 is a diagramatic cross-section, illustrating another embodiment of the invention; and

FIG. 6 is a diagramatic cross-sectional view taken along line 6--6 of FIG. 5, illustrating a side view.

DESCRIPTION OF REPRESENTATIVE EMBODIMENTS

In FIG. 1, a representative embodiment of an electrostatic air cleaning precipitator constructed in accordance with the present invention is included as a component device of a ventilator air cleaning precipitator system. The precipitator system 10, includes first and second filters 12 and 14, a blower fan 16, and a precipitator device 18, having an associated sump 20, for collecting liquids. The first and second filters, the fan and precipitator device, are disposed along a path 22 of an incoming air stream, illustrated as a pollutant air source 24, containing entrained particles and odors to be removed. Such entrained particles may be in the form of dust, grease, steam, smoke, pollen, and the like, many of which may be of the submicron size.

Also included in the system 10 is an electrical source of alternating current (A.C.) power 26, push-button interlock switches 28 and 30, respectively, for interconnecting with a direct current (D.C.) power supply 32 and fan 16. The D.C. power supply 32, is connected to precipitator device 18, through a convenient circuit disconnect 34, along conductor 36, while the precipitator is grounded by conductor 38, and the power supply 32 is grounded by conductor 31.

The operation of the system is initiated by closing the switch 30 to connect A.C. source 26 to fan 16. When energized, the fan draws pollutant air 24 into the system along path 22, through the first and second filters 12 and 14. It should be noted that the filters are not absolutely required for suitable operation but may be preferred for certain applications. The partially filtered air is then blown into the inlet end of the precipitator 18, and is exhausted out through the outlet end thereof after having been cleaned. The manner in which the precipitator 18 is constructed and operates will be discussed in greater detail with reference to FIGS. 2-4.

Referring now to FIGS. 2-4, wherein like characters in each view are given the same reference designations, there is shown the precipitator 18, which includes four insulator frame members 40-46, connected to form a rectangular support frame 48. Within the walls of the frame 48 are a plurality of parallel disposed spaced-apart elements, essentially comprised of alternately spaced conductive substantially flat collector plate members 50, which are electrically interconnected by grounding bridge wire 52 (see FIG. 4) a plurality of unitary plate members 54, each having an ionizer electrode 56 at the upstream end and a passive electrode 58 extending from the ionizer electrode 56 to the downstream end. The upstream end of the device is adjacent to the incoming air, while the downstream end is near the exhaust air outlet. Each of the unitary plate members 54 is electrically interconnected by a bridging conductive member 60.

Referring specifically to FIG. 4, it can be seen that each unitary plate member 54 is electrically insulated from each collector electrode by a series of grooved insulation support members 62, which extend the full length of the frame 48 (also see FIG. 3). These insulative support members 62 are positioned at both the top and the bottom of the frame 48, adjacent frame members 40 and 44. However, it should be recognized that these insulative support members 62 may be included as an integral part of adjacent frame members 40 and 44.

Referring now to FIGS. 2 and 3, the physical configuration of the ionizer electrode 56 is shown in greater detail. As shown in the drawings, a saw-toothed edge member 64, forms the active corona discharge tips or points for the electrode. In contrast to the fine wire or single tip corona needle most commonly utilized in the prior art, the present ionizer electrode is provided with multiple corona discharge points, for which the corona discharge may advantageously be maintained. Upon closer inspection with reference to FIG. 2, it can be seen that the saw-blade configuration of the ionizer electrode has a "set," that is, alternate teeth of the saw-blade member point to opposite sides of the corona discharge region.

The unique-feature of the "set" in the corona teeth or tips of the corona electrode 64 enable the corona discharge to be substantially uniformly distributed in a fixed manner along the entire length of the structure and corona discharge region. In general, it is believed that the individual teeth of the saw-blade structure are capable of substantially independent operation, and, thereby providing a structure of novel functional capabilities. In contrast to the single fine-wire electrode commonly employed in the prior art, the saw-blade configuration 64 of the present invention provides several advantages. Firstly, it provides multiple needle points for independent high current paths, such that any entrained particles which may be collected thereon may be burned off readily by high currents drawn by the points of the teeth. Secondly, the needle points are staggered from point to point, such that substantially fixed uniform corona discharge exists along the entire length on either side thereof when negative corona is utilized whereas, if the corona electrode was a fine wire the corona discharge therealong when negative corona is utilized would not always be in fixed positions, but would vary in their position depending on whether or not there was a build-up of impurities on the wire, thereby causing a significant degradation of performance.

Thirdly, as illustrated in FIG. 2, the ends of the needle points are located outward of the sides of the plate members 54 so as to be closer to the collector electrodes 50 than any other point on the plate members 54. This prevents or greatly deters the creation of corona conditions between impurities settling on downstream areas of the plate members 54 and the opposed collectors 50, and thereby further ensures proper ionizer performance.

In conclusion, the precipitator device 18 may be considered completed by the presence of a grounding shim 66, which is shown in FIG. 3, as being connected to conductor 38, and then to ground potential. The grounding shim 66 is connected to all of the collector electrodes 50, so as to place them at ground potential with respect to the polarity of the unitary member electrodes 54, which are connected to another polarity with respect to ground by conductor 36, which is connected to the D.C. power supply 32. The D.C. power supply is also grounded on one side. The polarity of the ionizer may be either positive or negative with respect to ground for operation. However, in practical operation of the precipitator, it has been found that the use of a negative potential is preferred.

In operation, the precipitator device 18, in the representative embodiment of FIGS. 2-4, has the unitary members 54, including the ionizer 56 and the passive electrode 58, at a negative potential with respect to ground potential and the collector electrodes 50, which, as noted, are connected to ground potential by means of shim 66 and conductor 38.

Such connections produce a negative corona discharge in the upstream portion of the device between the saw-blade teeth section 64 of the ionizer 56 and the upstream end of collector electrode 50. Between the passive electrode 58 and the remainder of the collector electrodes 50, there is produced a strong electric field on the non-corona discharge type.

The incoming pollutant air 24 carrying both large and small particles and odors, which were not filtered out by the first and second filters, enters the corona discharge region adjacent to the saw-blade teeth 64, where they pick-up negative charge from ions in the corona discharge, either by diffusion charging or electric field charging. In general, the larger particles acquire their charge by electric field charging, while the smaller particles, such as submicron particles, acquire their charge principally by diffusion charging.

It is noteworthy to observe that diffusion charging is known to occur more readily when there is "corona wind" such as that generated by the saw-blade teeth ionizer in the present invention which causes turbulence in the ionization region. With the saw-blade arrangement of the present invention, it is believed that greater "corona wind" is generated than heretofore known in compact precipitators. Thus, high efficiency in the present device is caused in part by the "corona wind." The turbulence caused by such corona wind can cause an increase in the residence time of the particles in the ionization region and an increase in the particle size due to agglomeration resulting from the presence of turbulence. Both of these effects will result in a much higher charge per particle level on those particles entering the collection region of the device. The above mentioned turbulence can also cause an increase in particle collection in the collection region of the device due to the transport of charged particles to the collector walls as a result of what may be termed "large scale" turbulence.

Referring now to FIGS. 5 and 6 there is shown another embodiment of the invention wherein the precipitator 18 has disposed therein a unitary structure 70, including a plurality of combination ionizers 56 and passive electrodes 58, and a unitary structure 72, including a plurality of collector electrodes 50 forming an interleaving arrangement therebetween. The unitary structure 70 is disposed within the precipitator 18 by at least two stand-off electrical connectors 74 which are supported by a housing enclosure 76 of the precipitator. Connected to one of the connectors 74 is a cable 77, including the conductor 36, for applying a D.C. potential to the combined ionizer and passive electrode as discussed hereinabove. The remainder of the device, which is metal, including the collector electrode structure 72, may be connected to ground potential by the conductor 38. Also shown in FIG. 5 is a deflection baffle 78 disposed in the upstream end of the precipitator 18 and a sump 20 as an integral component of the precipitator 18 with a plurality of gravity-flow apertures 80 opening into the sump 20 for permitting the flow of liquids from the precipitation region to the sump. For convenience the sump 20 is in the form of a drawer, is slidably removable by pulling a knob 82, and is guided along support guide grooves 84.

In FIG. 6 the relative space relationships of the elements of the precipitator 18 may be seen more clearly. Baffle 78 may be deflected at an angle to the flow of air through the device, and has been disposed with respect to the ionizer 56 and passive electrode 58 to prevent any air from flowing along a path indicated by a curved broken-line arrow 88. This arrangement insures that no entrained airborne particles are collected on top of the unitary structure 70, where they may cause shorting between structure 70 and the enclosure 76, which is at ground potential while the structure 70 may be at high negative potential.

The electrical operation of the precipitation shown in FIGS. 5 and 6 is essentially the same as that discussed hereinabove with respect to other embodiments. However, it should be noted that the illustrated arrangement has the very important advantage of eliminating the possibility for shorting between the elements which may occur readily if there are conductive particles in the pollutant air source.

Thus, it can be readily appreciated that the present invention has several additional advantages over prior art precipitator arrangements. The most noticeable one being its ability to collect particles of all sizes more effectively and efficiently in a smaller package. Another advantage of the invention is the elimination of the two-chamber precipitator arrangements, which enable the device to be built economically and compactly, in contrast to prior art devices. Precipitators in accordance with the present invention have been built, tested, and compared with data covering existing commercial precipitators. The results of several comparisons are set forth below in a table:

Commercial Capacity in Thruput in Precipitator Cubic Foot Frontal Cubic Foot/ Example Per Minute Area Min/Square Inch 1 1400 211/4".times.171/2" 3.86 2 2800 211/4".times.363/4" 3.58 3 800 16 1/16".times. 11 11/16" 4.20 4 1200 277/8" .times. 113/4" 3.66 5 2000 311/2" .times. 16 7/16" 3.86 Present Invention 600 51/4" .times. 51/4" 21.60

From the foregoing data illustrating comparisons, it is believed that the precipitator, in accordance with the present invention, is capable of cleaning approximately five times as much air per unit time per unit cross-sectional area as prior-art commercial air cleaning apparatus.

The foregoing would certainly support the belief that the present invention is capable of greater efficiency per unit frontal area and is adaptable to compactness in packaging in its construction.

Still another advantage may be derived from the present invention, namely, that of making the precipitator a multiple-stage device by placing two or more of the unitary plate members 54 in series, such that the upstream end of the passive electrode is far enough removed from the next succeeding ionizer saw-blade element 64 not to interfere with the corona discharge to be produced with such positioning. It is obvious that under certain conditions, it may be highly desirable to utilize such a multiple-stage precipitator, such as, for example, where greater air volume capability is required along with minimum volume and size of precipitator device. For example, the efficiency of the precipitator may be increased by staging the unitary plate members in series along the flow path of air while capacity in terms of cubic inches of flow per minute (CFM) may be increased by adding units in parallel to the flow path of the air stream.

Finally, the simplicity of construction of the present invention offers another advantage for economy of manufacture for commercial use.

It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the above-described embodiments are intended to be merely exemplary, in that they are susceptable to modification and variation without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, it will be apparent that the precipitator of the present invention may be adapted for high-pressure oil separation systems, vacuum cleaners and other numerous air pollution control devices. All such modifications and variations, therefore, are intended to be included within the scope and spirit of the invention, as defined by the appended claims.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed