U.S. patent number 3,701,482 [Application Number 05/125,172] was granted by the patent office on 1972-10-31 for foam generating nozzle.
Invention is credited to Norman H. Sachnik, 1035 Columbia.
United States Patent |
3,701,482 |
|
October 31, 1972 |
FOAM GENERATING NOZZLE
Abstract
A foam generating nozzle is to be used for applying treating
material entrained into foam to plants. A mix of water, foam agent
and treatment material is fed through a valve to the generating
nozzle. The generating nozzle jets the liquid into a low pressure
chamber where it draws air into it and from there, the low pressure
chamber is isolated from the high pressure chamber by a throat
section. Effort is made to conserve as much energy as possible so
the high pressure section will have a pressure of at least
one-fifth the pressure of the source of the liquid. The foam is
dispersed from the high pressure section by interchangeable
spray-pattern nozzles to obtain the desired pattern for dispersing
the foam.
Inventors: |
Norman H. Sachnik, 1035
Columbia (Houston, TX 77008) |
Family
ID: |
22418510 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/125,172 |
Filed: |
March 17, 1971 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
239/590.3;
169/15; 169/70; 261/DIG.26 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B05B
7/0056 (20130101); Y10S 261/26 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B05B
7/00 (20060101); B05b 001/14 () |
Field of
Search: |
;239/419.5,428.5,590,590.3,590.5,429,433 ;169/15,14 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Lloyd L. King
Assistant Examiner: Thomas C. Culp, Jr.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Joe E. Edwards M. H. Gay Alfred H.
Evans Jack R. Springgate W. Ronald Robins Julian Clark Martin
Claims
1. A foam generating nozzle comprising an inlet nipple adapted to
receive fluid under pressure, a disc disposed in the downstream end
of said nipple, said disc having at least one passage extending
therethrough, a body joined to said nipple, said body having a low
pressure chamber in communication with said disc and receiving
fluid passing therethrough and said body having a throat smaller in
diameter than said low pressure chamber and connected to and
receiving fluid from the low pressure chamber and said body having
at least one radially disposed air port therein communicating
between said low pressure chamber and the exterior of said body and
said body having a diverging frusto-conical section communicating
at its smaller end with the downstream end of said throat, a spray
pattern member joined to the larger end of said frusto-conical
section, said spray pattern member having at its upstream end a
high pressure chamber and at its downstream end one or more bores
conveying fluid from said high pressure chamber to the exterior of
said nozzle, said high pressure chamber having a volume no greater
than ten times the volume of said throat, so that a back pressure
is held on foam being released from the nozzle but upon stoppage of
flow of fluid to said nipple
2. The nozzle of claim 1 wherein said spray pattern member has a
plurality of bores and wherein a pair of spaced wings are provided
on the outlet end of the spray pattern member and wherein the said
bores converge toward their outlet ends to mix fluid from the bores
in the space between said wings.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application is related to applicant's prior filed patent
applications which include 830,088 6-3-69 824,868 5-15-69 634,551
4-28-67 561,740 6-30-66 (now abandoned) However, at the time of
filing, the claims of this application do not read on any of the
prior applications.
1. Field of the invention
This invention relates to horticulture and more particularly to
applying treating material such as herbicides, pesticides,
fungicides and the like, entrained in foam, to plants. More
specifically, it is concerned with the generation of the foam with
the treating material entrained therein.
Treating materials for plants, traditionally, have been dusted upon
the plants dry or applied to the plants in a liquid. Sometime the
treating material is applied to the plants in an oil or hydrocarbon
base. More generally, the treating material is applied to the plant
in a water spray.
LOWENSTEIN, British Pat. No. 486,113, suggests that the treating
material could be entrained in a foam.
My prior patent applications, set out above, all involve applying
treating materials to plants, the treating material being entrained
in foam.
The Department of Agriculture has made some investigation of this,
although I am unaware of any publication of their work, but there
have been some news releases of their work as reported in the
November 1968 issue of the Farm Journal.
Whereas there is almost no prior art before my entry into the field
concerning the entrainment of treating material into foam to be
applied to plants, the art has been highly developed for foam
generating nozzles for fire fighting purposes.
TUVE ET AL, U.S. Pat. No. 2,556,239, discloses a nozzle and goes
into considerable detail. He discloses a nozzle which has the low
pressure chamber with the i.e., TUVE liquid spray jetted into it,
the low pressure chamber having a converging section to a
cylindrical throat followed by diverging section wherein it then
extends to a dispersing nozzle. TUVE's high velocity nozzle
converges at the same angle as the low pressure chamber. Also, TUVE
recognizes in his particular field of fire fighting the
desirability of generating a low expansion foam. I.e., a foam
having about three parts air to one part liquid. He recognizes it
is desirable to have a throat area of about two and one-half times
the velocity nozzle area. However, TUBE considers it important for
his application to have a very large volume in the high pressure
chamber. He states that the length of the high pressure chamber
should be 20 to 30 times the diameter of the throat section. Of
course, TUVE contemplates an operation wherein once the generator
was activated, it would remain generating until its task was
completed and does not contemplate an intermittent operation.
BRAZIER, U.S. Pat. No. 2,990,885, discloses a nozzle to produce
foam for fire fighting wherein the high velocity nozzle jets the
initial stream of liquid outward against a converging ring. BRAZIER
states that one of his objects is to provide a foam nozzle to
obtain a very high volume of expansion. Also, he contemplates that
the ambient atmosphere is in direct communication with the
turbulent area, which is in direct conflict to my teaching
herein.
TIMPSON, U.S. Pat. No. 2,388,508, discloses a nozzle for a
generating foam which has a selector valve wherein it can either
produce foam or a solid stream. TIMPSON is not believed to disclose
his valve as being a cutoff valve.
[Other U.S. patents found in a search before filing this patent
application, but were not considered pertinent, include: RE. 25,037
3,040,758 1,816,417 3,117,629]
Generating foam for applying treating material to plants is
basically different than generating foam for fire fighting
purposes. Although, TUVE discloses a low expansion ratio for fire
fighting purposes, most fire fighting foam is a high expansion
ratio, sometimes as high as 50 to 1. However, probably the most
important difference between the generation of foam for application
to plants and for fire fighting is that the generation for plants
must be an intermittent or an on and off proposition. i.e.,
normally the application will be by a hand-held gun sprayer wherein
a valve is opened to produce spray for a short period of time to
apply the spray to a particular plant or a group of plants and the
valve is closed to shut off the generation of foam until the
operator moves on to the place of next application. This is even
the pattern of operation for aerial spraying, I.e., the foam will
be generated for spraying one pass over a field and then the valve
is closed to shut off generation while the plane turns to be in
position to generate foam for the next pass. On the other hand, for
fire fighting purposes, once the foam is generated, it is not
discontinued until the fire is extinguished. When foam generation
is discontinued in the use of a fire fighting nozzle of known
design, the nozzle has compressed air therein which will cause the
foam within the nozzle to expand and since there is no flow through
the nozzle, the foam will back up and clog the air inlet holes. As
stated before for fire fighting, this is no problem whatsoever
because when the nozzle is shut down, the equipment is cleaned up
in preparation for the next fire. However, if this type nozzle were
used for applying treating material, it gives an undesirable effect
because it not only produces a foam of undesirable quality, but the
nozzle often must be cleaned each time the generation of foam is
interrupted.
Therefore, I have found that the volume of the high pressure
chamber must be reduced to a minimum. The high pressure chamber
must be present because it is necessary that there be an agitation
or a mixing of the liquid and the air to generate foam. Therefore,
when the flow is shut off, the generated foam in the high pressure
section, as it expands, will not expand sufficiently to clog the
low pressure chamber nor the air ports into the low pressure
chamber.
Also, the dispersing nozzles for fire fighting purposes have been
almost identical to water nozzles. I have found that to spray the
foam for agricultural purposes, it is usually necessary to break
the foam up into globulets. For different types of application,
there are various, distinct spray patterns desirable; therefore, I
have found it desirable to be able to interchange the spray pattern
dispersing nozzle without having to completely redesign the entire
generating nozzle.
2. Objects of the Invention
An object of this invention is to apply treating material entrained
in foam to plants.
Further objects are to achieve the above with a device that is
sturdy, compact, durable, lightweight, simple, safe, efficient,
versatile, and reliable, yet inexpensive and easy to manufacture,
operate, and maintain.
The specific nature of the invention, as well as other objects,
uses, and advantages thereof, will clearly appear from the
following description and from the accompanying drawing, the
different views of which are not necessarily to the same scale.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
FIG. 1 is a axial sectional view, partially schematic, of a foam
generating nozzle according to this invention.
FIG. 2 is a side elevational view of the generating nozzle attached
to a hand gun for hand operation.
FIG. 3 is an illustration of a modified form of the nozzle
particularly adapted for use on an airplane.
FIG. 4 is an elevational view of a part of the airplane
modification taken on line 4--4 of FIG. 3.
FIG. 5 is a sectional representation of a spray pattern nozzle for
projecting the foam an extremely long distance.
FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view taken substantially on line 6--6
of FIG. 5.
FIG. 7 is an axial sectional view of another spray pattern nozzle
projecting another foam pattern.
FIG. 8 is a sectional view taken on line 8--8 of FIG. 7.
FIG. 9 is an axial sectional view of a spray pattern nozzle
designed to produce a scattered foam pattern.
FIG. 10 is a cross-sectional view taken on line 10--10 of FIG.
9.
FIG. 11 is an elevational view of yet another spray pattern nozzle
producing a fan-shaped pattern.
FIG. 12 is an axial sectional view taken substantially on line
12--12 of FIG. 11.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Referring to the drawing, there is shown schematically in FIG. 1 a
source 10 of mix under pressure. The mix would include water, foam
agent, and treating material. Foam agents are well known to the art
as demonstrated by the patents identified above. The treating
material is also well known, as set out above. The treating
material may be any of several materials used for treating plants.
These materials may be herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, or
other pesticides. These materials also may include fertilizer to be
applied to the leaves of the plants.
From the source 10 under pressure, the material is transmitted in
suitable conduit such as hose 12 to valve 14. As illustrated in
FIG. 2, this valve in the form of a hand gun 70 with the generating
nozzle 16 attached thereto, or in the case of the particular
modification for airplanes, the valve (not shown) is controlled by
the pilot and it would not be immediately adjacent to the plurality
of airplane foam generating nozzles 18. (FIG. 3, also see FIG. 3 of
application Ser. No. 824,868).
Referring to FIG. 1, it may be seen that inlet nipple 20 has
external threads 22 thereupon. These threads mate with internal
threads 24 of nozzle body 26. Velocity nozzle disc 28 is within the
inlet of the body 26 and one edge seats against shoulder 30 formed
between the internal bore 32 of the body and the end of the nipple
20. The disc 28 has drilled therethrough a plurality (such as three
to six) of inlet velocity nozzles 34. The cylindrical nozzles
divert outward, having an apex angle of a, which I have found to be
desirable at 4.degree. to 6.degree.. Other than the apex divergent
angle, the nozzles 34 are straight, i.e., they are not helixed.
The bore 32 has a first low pressure chamber 36. This includes a
short cylindrical section 38 and a frusto-conical converging outlet
section 40. The frusto-conical outlet section 40 has an apex angle
b of from 10.degree. to 14.degree.. Ports 42 extend through the
body 26 into the cylindrical section 38. The ports 42 admit ambient
air into the low pressure chamber 36. The low pressure chamber 36
terminates with throat 44. The throat is a cylindrical portion of
the bore 32. The length of the throat 44 is no less than twice its
diameter. The cross-sectional area of the throat 44 bears a
specific relationship to the combined cross-sectional area of the
velocity nozzles 34. I.e., the cross-sectional area of the throat
44 is between 2.2 and 2.75 times the cross-sectional area of all of
the velocity nozzles 34. Because there is some leeway with this
area, it is possible to change discs 28 for a grater or lesser foam
generation. The rate the foam is generated will depend solely upon
the area of the velocity nozzles 34 and the pressure of the source
10 within the nipple 20 just before the mix enters the velocity
nozzles 34. Therefore, although the optimum size of the area of the
velocity nozzles will be 1/2.5 of the cross-sectional area of the
throat 44, it may be seen that this may be increased by 10 percent
to 2.75 or decreased by about 10 percent to 2.2 for the production
of greater or lesser foam. Also, the pressure can be increased or
decreased so the nozzle produces a greater or lesser amount of
foam.
As will be discussed later, spray pattern nozzle 46 may be changed
to produce different spray patterns, but the changing of the spray
pattern nozzle 46 does not affect the quality or the quantity of
the foam produced. When I use the term "it does not affect the
quality", it is meant that the size of the air bubbles or the ratio
of air to liquid in the foam is not affected. It does affect the
quality of the foam if the size of globulets is considered to be a
factor of foam quality.
From the throat section 44, the bore 32 has a diverging
frusto-conical section 48. This diverging section will have an apex
angle c between 14.degree. and 30.degree.. The body 26 at the
diverging section 48 has external threads 50 thereon to mate with
internal threads of the spray pattern nozzle 46. The spray pattern
nozzle 46 has a chamber 52 equal in diameter to the root diameter
of the threads 50. This chamber is called the high pressure chamber
52. The high pressure is defined to include the entire volume up to
the beginning of the spray pattern nozzle bore 54. The spray
pattern nozzle bore itself has a diameter which is greater than the
diameter of the throat section 44.
With this design, the mix jetting through the velocity nozzles 34
will create a low pressure area within the low pressure chamber 36.
This low pressure area will be below ambient pressure and
therefore, there will be an inward flow of air through the inlet
ports 42. The jets impinge against the converging walls of conical
outlet 40 and proceed on into the throat section 44. The throat
section 44 will have low pressure. The flow through the majority of
the throat section will be straight forward without turbulence.
Therefore, up until this point there will be little or no foam
generated, although there will be a carrying of the air forward
into the throat area. At the outlet of the throat area begins
turbulence and therefore, the beginning of foam generation. There
will be additional foam generation and turbulence through the
diverging section 48. The generation is completed and the foam
refined in the high pressure chamber 52.
As the area 48 diverges, the pressure will increase. There has been
a very small loss of energy to this point. I.e., all of the energy
contained in the entering fluid within the nipple 20, because of
its pressure, has been retained in the high pressure chamber 52.
This pressure energy in the nipple 20 was changed to velocity
energy as it went through the nozzles 34 and through the throat
section 44. In the high pressure chamber 52, the energy is again
converted to pressure energy. Specifically, after the foam has been
discharged from the spray pattern nozzle bore 54, the volume will
be three or four times as great as the entering liquid volume in
the nipple 20. Therefore, if from an energy standpoint the nozzle
were one hundred percent efficient, the pressure in the high
pressure chamber 52 would be less because of the greater volume. I
have been able to maintain the gauge pressure within the high
pressure chamber 52 in ratio to the gauge pressure within the
nipple 20 of 5 to 1 maximum to a low of 2.7 to 1. The energy of the
material within the high pressure chamber 52 is again transformed
into velocity energy as it is discharged from the spray pattern
nozzle bore 54.
The design criteria set forth above are specifically designed to
obtain a well mixed, fine bubble-size foam, a short nozzle 16, a
high velocity discharge, a wet foam having about four times the
volume of the inlet liquid. In addition to these factors, it is
also essential that when the valve 14 is snapped shut and the flow
of the liquid ceases, the foam from the high pressure chamber 52
does not back up through the throat 44 into the low pressure
chamber 36 and clog the air ports 42. It is essential in ordinary
operation that the turbulence within the latter part of the throat
area 44 and the generation of the foam does not permit any of the
foam to back up so as to clog the low pressure area.
One of the functions of the high pressure chamber 52 is the
refinement of the foam so there are fine air bubbles through the
foam; particularly when a wet foam is being generated, (such as 3
1/2 to 1 or less expansion), difficulty is experienced with some of
the liquid exits in the liquid phase rather than in a foam phase.
If there is not good mixing with a small air bubble or a fine air
bubble structure, this is likely to happen. However, with the
design set forth as I have described it, I have been able to
achieve my desired objective. One of the points in the design is
that the volume of the high pressure chamber is no greater than ten
times the volume of the throat 44. E.g., if the volume of the
throat is one cubic centimeter, the volume of the high pressure
chamber must be no greater than ten cubic centimeters.
Referring to FIG. 3, there may be seen a slightly different
modified form of the nozzle as would be used on aircraft. In this
figure, the source of mix under pressure has not been shown nor has
the valve to cause intermittent flow to the generator 18 been
shown. It will be understood that there would be a manifold and a
plurality of generators 18 on the manifold and the valve would be
located between the source of the mix under pressure and the
manifold. There is an inlet nipple 120 having external threads 122
which mate with internal threads on 124 upon a cuff 123 which holds
the body 126 in place. The body has a plurality of air inlets or
air ports 142 in the low pressure chamber which includes the
frusto-conical outlet 140 which leads into the throat 144 which
then is dispersed from the diverging frusto-conical portion 148
into the high pressure chamber 152. The twirling disc 125 has a
plurality of veins 127 which import a circular motion to the fluid.
Then when the fluid passes through the orifice 134 within the disc
128, the liquid will spray from the orifice from about 4.degree. to
6.degree. conical angle. Also, the apex angle upon the diverging
frusto-conical section 148 is much greater than 30.degree.. The
spray pattern nozzles formed by the bores 154 through the outlet of
the spray pattern nozzle 146 have a very high diameter to the
length. Therefore, the foam would pass through them with a great
deal of turbulence rather than high velocity jet and they impinge
against the exterior flange 156.
Because of the particular design of the airplane generator 18 shown
in FIG. 3, the pressure in the high pressure chamber 152 will not
be extremely high because there is a loss of energy through
inefficiency of the passage through the orifice 134 and the other
inefficiencies of the design. However, with the airplane nozzle,
the only pressure needed in the high pressure chamber 152 is to
force the foam out through the nozzles 154 and against the splatter
flange 156. As soon as the foam is forced out and against the
splatter flange, the air stream created by the movement of the
aircraft through the air will cause the spray to break up into
globulets and then it is necessary only that they be carried by the
air stream and gravity to their desired location.
However, it will be understood that the nozzle shown in FIG. 3 is a
special purpose nozzle and it is adapted to be used only for
dispersing the foam into an air stream and therefore, because of
this special consideration, it is designed as it is.
One of the advantages of my design is that the same generator with
the same body 26 may be used with several different dispersing
nozzles. The dispersing nozzle 46 shown in FIG. 1 has a length of
about twice its diameter; therefore, this will result in a pattern
wherein the foam stays reasonably well together and there is only
medium turbulence at the time foam is discharged, resulting in a
rather close together stream which projects a reasonable
distance.
Referring to FIG. 7, there is illustrated a spray pattern nozzle
746, having spray pattern nozzle bore 754 illustrated where the
length of the bore is several times greater than the diameter of
the bore. However, there is one single bore. Because of the longer
bore, there will be less turbulence in the spray and therefore, the
spray will be projected a longer distance and there will be less
scattering of the foam.
FIG. 5 illustrates a spray pattern nozzle 546 wherein there is
illustrated a plurality of bores 554, each of which is extremely
long with respect to the diameter. Also, the bores have a slight
angle of convergence with a conical apex angle d of only one or two
degrees. Therefore, foam will be thrown an extremely long distance
without particularly breaking up. With pressures of 100 pounds at
the inlet to the velocity nozzle, this dispersing nozzle will throw
foam for over 50 feet. With pressures up to 300 pounds, the nozzle
will throw foam about 70 feet.
The dispersing nozzle 946 shown in FIG. 9 is designed so it
produces an F-shaped pattern which has a width of over half its
maximum projected distance. Therefore, it is desirable for certain
applications. To obtain this, slot 956 is cut along the bottom of
bore 954 of the spray pattern nozzle 946. Thus, the pattern is
"spoiled" in this particular area so it produces this particular
design and breaks the foam into globulets.
FIG. 12 shows a design of dispersing nozzle 246 for producing a
fan-shaped pattern. In it two nozzles 254 project a jet of fluid
which converge at a sharp angle and therefore splatter, breaking
the foam into small globulets on either side. The two bores 254
project from the high-pressure chamber 252. Wings 258 help to shape
and control the spray pattern.
The embodiments shown and described above are only exemplary. I do
not claim to have invented all the parts, elements or steps
described. Various modifications can be made in the construction,
material, arrangement, and operation, and still be within the scope
of my invention. The limits of the invention and the bounds of the
patent protection are measured by and defined in the following
claims. The restrictive description and drawing of the specific
example above do not point out what an infringement of this patent
would be, but are to enable the reader to make and use the
invention.
* * * * *