U.S. patent number 3,695,509 [Application Number 05/057,718] was granted by the patent office on 1972-10-03 for centrifugal separator for separating emulsions.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Termomeccanica Italiana S.p.A.. Invention is credited to Alain Ferdinand Javet.
United States Patent |
3,695,509 |
Javet |
October 3, 1972 |
CENTRIFUGAL SEPARATOR FOR SEPARATING EMULSIONS
Abstract
A centrifugal separator for emulsions comprises a rotating drum
with an admission chamber at one end thereof, connected to
atmosphere via an axial supply inlet, and a multitude of separating
tubes arranged around an axial hub to extend longitudinally from
the common admission chamber to a common outlet chamber at the
other end of the drum. One or more outlets connected to atmosphere
are arranged to discharge the lighter constituent of the emulsion
from the discharge chamber at a radial distance lying between the
radius of the supply inlet and that of the hub. An outlet duct
connected to atmosphere extends from the periphery of the outlet
chamber towards the drum axis so as to discharge the heavier
constituent at a radial distance slightly greater than that of the
discharge outlet for the lighter constituent of the emulsion.
Liquid movement through the separator is provided through
centrifugal force only. Emulsion supplied to the admission chamber
is driven radially outward and forms therein a coaxial liquid level
at atmospheric pressure. The lighter constituent forms in the
outlet chamber a coaxial overflow level at atmospheric pressure at
the discharge outlet. The heavier constituent forms a further
coaxial overflow level at atmosphere pressure, at the discharge end
of the outlet duct.
Inventors: |
Javet; Alain Ferdinand (Geneve,
CH) |
Assignee: |
Termomeccanica Italiana S.p.A.
(La Spezia, IT)
|
Family
ID: |
4379568 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/057,718 |
Filed: |
July 23, 1970 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 8, 1969 [CH] |
|
|
12071/69 |
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
494/76;
494/43 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B04B
1/00 (20130101); B04B 5/00 (20130101); B01D
17/0217 (20130101); B04B 11/02 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B04B
5/00 (20060101); B04B 1/00 (20060101); B04B
11/00 (20060101); B04B 11/02 (20060101); B01D
17/02 (20060101); B04b 001/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;233/31,32,27,39,41,46,47R,2R,21,29,28,30 ;210/380 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Franklin; Jordan
Assistant Examiner: Krizmanich; George H.
Claims
I claim:
1. A centrifugal separator for dividing an emulsion into a light
and a heavy fraction, comprising:
a drum rotatable about a central axis, said drum having a
cylindrical casing with a pair of end walls and a closed hub within
said casing axially spaced from said end walls, one of said end
walls forming a first header defining an entrance manifold with
said hub, the other of said end walls forming a second header
defining an exit manifold with said hub, said first header being
provided with a central opening of a radius smaller than the hub
radius connecting said entrance manifold with the atmosphere;
a multiplicity of axially extending conduits clustered about said
hub, said conduits forming passages between said manifolds of a
diameter substantially smaller than their distances from said
axis;
feed means for introducing an emulsion into said entrance manifold,
said feed means passing with clearance through said opening;
baffle means in said exit manifold dividing same into an annular
duct for the heavy fraction and an outlet chamber for the light
fraction, said duct being open toward said passages near the
periphery of said casing and extending inwardly along said second
header in spaced relationship therewith;
first collector means communicating with said duct for extracting
said heavy fraction therefrom while venting said duct to the
atmosphere; and
second collector means communicating with said outlet chamber for
extracting said light fraction therefrom while venting said chamber
to the atmosphere, both said first and second collector means
communicating with said exit manifold at locations spaced from said
axis by distances larger than the radius of said opening but
smaller than the radius of said hub.
2. A separator as defined in claim 1 wherein said second header and
said baffle means are generally frustoconical, said chamber
converging radially outwardly in a zone containing the outlet ends
of said passages.
3. A separator as defined in claim 2 wherein said first header is
generally frustoconical, said entrance manifold converging radially
outwardly in a zone containing a pair of coaxial channels.
4. A separator as defined in claim 1 wherein said first and second
collector means comprise a pair of coaxial channels.
5. A system as defined in claim 4 wherein said first and second
collector means further comprises two sets of tubes opening with
clearance into said channels.
6. A system as defined in claim 5 wherein said tubes are generally
L-shaped and provided with substantially radial legs received
within said channels.
Description
This invention relates generally to the separation of liquid
mixtures and particularly to the separation of the two constituents
or fractions of different density of an emulsion.
It is known that when two non miscible liquids are brought
together, an emulsion may be formed in which the liquid having
higher surface tension is more or less uniformly divided in the
mass of the liquid with lower surface tension. The formation of
emulsions is by no means desirable in many cases but is an
inevitable consequence of various industrial operations and may
also occur when handling liquids and in particular during their
transport. Consequently, separation of emulsions into their
constituents is of great interest in various technical fields.
Thus, for example, the treatment of certain industrial waters and
of the water used for washing the tanks of oil tankers requires
such a separation in an effective and economical manner. Known
static separators are generally very cumbersome since they comprise
decanting tanks having dimensions which may readily become
prohibitive when it is required to treat large amounts of liquid on
an industrial scale. In addition, their effectiveness often does
not meet the now prevailing requirements provided for by the
water-pollution laws.
The known dynamic separators, although more effective, are,
however, relatively complicated and have a price which is too high
for many applications. There is thus a definite need for a simple
and sturdy separator with slight bulk which allows an effective
liquid/liquid separation with low energy consumption at a cost
which is well below that of conventional dynamic separators.
The separating means now existing require, for each application
contemplated, that a compromise be made between the quality of the
separation and the flow rate of the treated liquid mixture. As a
matter of fact, when it is desired to separate as completely as
possible liquids which are difficult to separate, one is faced with
a choice of equipment (e.g., supercentrifuges) whose cost which is
high in relation to the volume of liquid mixture treated. If, on
the other hand, it is desired to treat liquids of low value which
are easy to separate, one has a choice of relatively inexpensive
equipment which is, however, cumbersome and much less
effective.
The main object of the present invention is to provide a
centrifugal separator which is simple, compact and inexpensive in
design and allows the above-mentioned disadvantages to be obviated.
According to the invention, a centrifugal separator for separating
emulsions into two liquid constituents of different density
comprises a rotating drum forming an admission chamber for the
emulsion to be separated, arranged at one end of the drum, an
outlet chamber for the separated constituents, arranged at the
other end thereof, and an intermediate portion including a
separating zone consisting of a multitude of longitudinally
extending separating passages arranged around an axial hub and
interconnecting these chambers. The admission chamber has an axial
inlet communicating with the ambient atmosphere, the outlet chamber
being equipped with at least one outlet for the constituent of
lower density; this outlet communicates with the ambient atmosphere
and serves to discharge the lower-density constituent at a distance
from the drum axis greater than the radius of the inlet and smaller
than the radius of the hub, the outlet chamber being further
equipped with at least one outlet duct for the constituent of
higher density, which extends from a peripheral zone of the outlet
chamber toward the axis of rotation, up to a radial distance equal
to or slighter greater than that of the outlet for the constituent
of lower density, and communicates with the ambient atmosphere.
In the accompanying drawing, in which I have illustrated two
embodiments of the separator according to the invention:
FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic sectional view showing a first embodiment
of the separator;
FIG. 2 shows a second embodiment of the separator, in axial
section; and
FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view taken on line III--III of FIG.
2.
The separator shown in FIG. 1 includes a plurality of separating
tubes 2 mounted parallel to its axis of rotation 5, along two
circular rows, around a hub consisting of a hollow cylinder 3
closed at both ends. This cylinder 3, the tubes 2 and a cylindrical
casing 4 of the drum 1 are solidly connected with one another so
that the tubes rotate around the horizontal axis 5 of the drum 1,
the latter being driven by a driving device (not shown) at a given
rotational speed. The drum 1 comprises, in addition, two transverse
end walls or headers 6, 7 in the shape of a truncated cone which
are solidly connected with the casing 4 and respectively prolonged
by an inlet tube 8 and a discharge tube 9 attached thereto at their
small base. The inlet tube 8 arranged axially at the inlet end of
the drum 1 has a smaller diameter than the discharge tube 9
situated at the outlet end, these tubes 8 and 9 being mounted in
bearings 10, 11, respectively. The tube 8 is closed at its free end
with the exception of an axial opening through which passes, with
clearance, a fixed pipe 12 for feeding the separator with emulsion
coming from a suitable source (not shown). The emulsion introduced
into the tube 8 spreads over the wall thereof owing to centrifugal
force, advances along this tube and reaches an inlet chamber 13
where it meets a baffle 14 in the shape of a truncated cone
arranged in the vicinity of the end wall 6 to form an annular
passage 15 emerging into the inlet chamber 13. The latter is
further provided with a transverse baffle 16 solidly connected to
the casing 4 and provided with an axial circular opening 17 having
a diameter larger than that of the tube 8. This baffle 16 is
arranged upstream of the cylinder 3 and of the tubes 2 so as to
form an annular passage 18 for bringing forward the emulsion to the
entry end of these tubes. These baffles 14 and 16 are adapted to
deviate the liquid mixture so as to separate therefrom any solid
impurity, under the effect of centrifugal force, before entry into
the tubes.
The tubes 2 emerge into an outlet chamber 19 bounded by another
frustoconical baffle 20 mounted opposite the end wall 7 and solidly
connected thereto, by means not shown in the drawing, so as to form
an annular outlet duct 27 extending from the periphery of chamber
19 toward the rotational axis 5. A tube 21 fixed to this baffle 20
at the end of duct 27 extends coaxially within the tube 9 to
provide an annular discharge channel 22 between these two tubes.
The free ends of the tubes 21 and 9 bear outer flanges 23 and 24
for directing the separated fractions towards annular collectors 25
and 26, respectively, constituted by a pair of coaxial
channels.
The described separator operates in the following manner:
The inlet chamber 13 and the outlet chamber 19 of the drum
communicate with the atmosphere through the tubes 8 and 9, 21,
respectively. Owing to centrifugal force, the liquid mixture
arriving through the pipe 12 spreads on the inner surface of the
rotating inlet tube 8 and advances along the latter towards the
entry chamber 13 where it is driven radially outward through the
passage 15, then returns towards the axis 5, between the baffles 14
and 16, to the opening 17 from which it overflows and is then
driven through the annular passage 18. The liquid thus reaches
inlet end of the tubes 2 wherein it flows towards the exit chamber
19. The centrifugal separation takes place in the tubes 2 in the
manner described below.
It will be assumed that the emulsion consists of two constituents,
of which a constituent A of lower density is dispersed in the form
of globules in the other constituent B of higher density. These two
constituents will hereinafter be referred to by the name of "light
fraction" and "heavy fraction", respectively. Owing to the rotation
of the tubes 2 around the axis 5, the liquid mixture circulating in
these tubes is subjected to the action of centrifugal force.
Because of the difference in density between the two fractions, the
globules of the light fraction are subjected to a thrust directed
towards the axis of rotation 5, thereby providing a progressive
separation of the two fractions along the tubes 2. The heavy
fraction is thus gradually brought to the far side of each tube 2,
that is the side remote from the axis of rotation 5, while the
globules of the light fraction accumulate, by coalescence on the
inner surface of the tubes 2, on the side which is nearer to the
axis 5.
On arrival of the two fractions in the chamber 19, the heavy
fraction B is first driven outwardly to the periphery of this
chamber, then passes between the baffle 20 and the end wall 7 and
thereupon flows into the discharge channel 22 at the outlet of
which this heavy fraction passes over the flange 24 and is drained
off by the collector 26. On the other hand, the enlarged globules
of the light fraction A, which are subjected to a thrust towards
the axis 5, accumulate before the inner end of the tube 21. The
light fraction thus separated then flows into the tube 21 and
proceeds toward the flange 23 which deviates it towards the
collector 25.
When, as opposed to the case assumed above, the liquid mixture in
question has a heavy fraction dispersed within the light fraction,
the separation through centrifugal force will be obtained in the
same manner in the tubes 2 except that the globules will then be
separated on the side remote from the axis 5.
It may be noted that the circulation through centrifugal force
takes place in the described separator thanks to the difference in
"level" or hydrostatic head, with regard to the axis 5, of the
liquid present in the entry chamber 13, on one hand, and end the
exit chamber 19, on the other. As a matter of fact, these levels
which are indicated in FIG. 1 are formed owing to the centrifugal
force acting on the liquid, on the one hand, and to the atmospheric
pressure prevailing in the inlet and outlet chambers on the other
hand. The inner end of tube 21 constitutes an outlet orifice
through which the light fraction A can flow over while forming, in
the outlet chamber 19, the level shown in FIG. 1. Moreover, the
annular duct 27 extending radially inward up to the vicinity of the
inner tube 21 allows this level to be established while at the same
time ensuring discharge of the heavy fraction from the periphery of
the outlet chamber 19.
The separating tubes could also be inclined in relation to the axis
of rotation so that their distance to the latter increases from
their inlet toward their outlet, to enhance circulation in the
tubes through an increased centrifugal pumping effect. Moreover,
the cross-section of the tubes may, if desired, be noncircular and
in particular asymmetrical so as to promote coalescence of the
globules separated therein. Thus, for example, each tube may have
an inner surface which is more concave in the zone where the
globules are accumulated. Similarly, the separating tubes need not
necessarily be rectilinear as described above. One may contemplate
using, for example, helicoidal tubes having a large pitch in
relation to the winding diameter, to render the separator more
compact in length.
As the separation is achieved through the effect of centrifugal
force, the device may be arranged with its axis in any desired
position other than the horizontal.
The centrifugal separator according to the second embodiment shown
in FIGS. 2 and 3 comprises a rotatable drum 1 with a vertical axis
5, forming at its upper end an admission chamber 13 provided with a
circular axial inlet 8 communicating with the ambient atmosphere
and at its lower end an outlet chamber 19 likewise communicating
with atmosphere. The intermediate part of the drum comprises a
multitude of vertical separating tubes 2 distributed equidistantly
around the axially positioned cylindrical hub 3 and extending,
parallel to the rotational axis 5, between the admission chamber 13
and the outlet chamber 19.
This general arrangement is similar to that of the described
separator shown in FIG. 1, the axis 5 being vertical instead of
horizontal for mechanical reasons only. Moreover, the circulation
of the emulsion as well as the separation of its constituents
occurs in exactly the same manner in both cases since they both
depend on the action of centrifugal force only.
As is shown in FIG. 2, the drum 1 is mounted on the hollow
cylindrical hub 3 which is driven by an electric motor 28 mounted
on a vertical base 29. Moreover, the separating tubes 2 are
arranged side by side so as to form a nest of tubes filling the
annular space between the hub 3 and the cylindrical casing 4 of the
drum 1. Assembly of the tubes 2 may be effected by using a suitable
mass, of adhesive material for example, allowing them to be solidly
connected together.
In this second embodiment according to FIGS. 2 and 3, the admission
chamber 13 is not equipped with deflecting means such as the
deflectors 14, 16 shown in FIG. 1, as such means are not required
in numerous applications of the separator where the emulsion to be
separated does not contain solid impurities.
As may further be seen in FIG. 2, the feed pipe 12 for introducing
the emulsion into the admission chamber 13 is equipped with a valve
30 for adapting the emulsion feed rate to the constituents to be
separated in each case. The emulsion entering the admission chamber
13 is driven radially by the centrifugal force due to rotation of
the drum 1 and forms, between header 6 and hub 3, an annular body
of liquid centered on the axis of rotation 5, as indicated by
dash-dotted lines in FIG. 2, with an inner cylindrical boundary of
radius R1 which is slightly greater than the radius ofinlet opening
8 but less than that of hub 3. The emulsion coming from the
admission chamber 13 passes through the tubes 2 where the
separation of its constituents occurs under the action of
centrifugal force in exactly the same manner as already described
with reference to FIG. 1. Moreover, the subsequent complete
separation of the lighter constituent A from the heavier
constituent B in the outlet chamber 19 and their separate discharge
from this chamber likewise occur in a similar manner in both
cases.
In this second embodiment, the lighter constituent A is discharged
by means of a group of discharge tubes 31 each mounted at an
orifice in the partition 20 so as to communicate with chamber 19.
These tubes 31 are evenly distributed on a circle with radius R2
(see FIG. 3), this radius being larger than that of the axial inlet
8 but smaller than the radius of the hub 3. Similarly, the annular
outlet duct 27 formed between the partition 20, the end wall 7 and
serving to bring back the heavier constituent B from the periphery
of the outlet chamber 19 toward the axis 5, emerges in a group of
discharge tubes 32 mounted equidistantly on the end wall 7 on a
circle with the same radius R2. As may be seen from FIG. 2, the
tubes 31 and 32 each comprise a first longitudinal portion followed
by a second outwardly turned radial portion emerging in a fixed
annular collector 25 and 26, respectively, which communicates with
the ambient atmosphere. The radially extending legs of the
generally L-shaped tubes 31 and 32 open with clearance into the
nested channels 25 and 26, respectively.
The lighter constituent A, arriving at the inlet of the tubes 31
communicating with the atmosphere, flows into these tubes while
forming around the axis 5 a liquid-overflow level situated at an
equal distance R2' therefrom. This liquid level formed in the
outlet chamber 19 and in the longitudinal entrance portion of tubes
31 is indicated by dash-dotted lines in FIG. 2. The heavier
constituent B arriving at the inlet of the discharge tubes 32 after
passing through the annular duct 27 flows into these tubes while
likewise forming a liquid-overflow level in the annular duct 27 and
in the longitudinal entrance portion of the tubes 32. This overflow
level formed by the heavier constituent B, also indicated by
dash-dotted lines in FIG. 2, surrounds axis 5 at an equal radial
distance R2" therefrom, this distance being greater by a few
millimeters, at the most, than the radial distance R2' of the
overflow level formed by the lighter constituent A. The constituent
A discharged from the tubes 31 is thus collected by the fixed
annular collector 25 while the heavier constituent B discharged
from the tubes 32 is collected by the fixed annular collector 26
which, in the present case, is formed between the base 29 and the
outer collector 25.
It may be readily seen that the separators described above are of
simple and compact design. They nevertheless permit emulsions to be
separated into their constituents very effectively at a high rate.
These substantial advantages are obtained through the particular
arrangement of the separating passages and of the common admission
and outlet chambers in the rotating drum.
As a matter of fact, the use of separating passages surrounding a
hub and extending longitudinally in the rotating drum between
common admission and outlet chambers provided with the described
inlet and outlet means, in conformity with my present invention,
allows very effective use of a multitude of separating tubes and,
consequently enables very high flow rates to be achieved without,
however, necessitating the use of complicated feed and discharge
means as was hitherto the case. Indeed, a closely spaced
arrangement of the tubes, as shown in FIG. 2, allows the annular
space between the hub 3 and the casing 4 of the drum to be
subdivided into a maximum number of separating passages 2 and hence
affords very high flow rates in the separator with minimum space
requirements. Moreover, this subdivision into a multitude of
separating passages allows a very small hydraulic diameter to be
obtained in each passage whereby the centrifugal separation is
promoted to a great extent for reasons explained below.
As is well known, the Reynolds number (Re), which corresponds to
the product of the flow speed w in a passage times the hydraulic
diameter d divided by the viscosity (v) of the fluid considered, is
generally used for defining the flow conditions of a fluid. Now, as
is likewise known, an effective centrifugal separation becomes
difficult or even impossible to achieve when the mixture to be
separated passes through the separating passage under turbulent
flow conditions. It is thus generally necessary to ensure laminar
flow conditions, i.e., a flow corresponding to Reynolds numbers (Re
= wd/v ) of less than about 2,000, in a centrifugal separating
passage. Since, however, the viscosity v is given for a given
liquid mixture or emulsion, either the flow speed w or the diameter
of each passage, or both, should be reduced in order to be able to
ensure laminar flow. It is evident, however, that a reduction of
the speed of flow through a separator with a given cross-section
will entail an undesirable restriction of the flow rate and hence
of the capacity of the separator. In the same way, the choice of a
separator with greater cross-section in order to ensure a reduced
velocity for a given flow rate is likewise undesirable on account
of the corresponding increase in the dimensions of the separator,
which is obviously a major disadvantage in a centrifugal separator.
As a matter of fact, owing to mechanical limitations, any increase
in the diameter of a rotating separator entails a reduction of the
maximum speed at which it may be operated and thus leads to a
reduction in the centrifugal separating effect which may be
achieved.
Now, as a rule, a reduction in the diameter of each separating
passage allows laminar flow to be achieved at a higher flow
velocity. However, in order to ensure a high flow rate it is
necessary to use a correspondingly large number of narrow
separating passages. As opposed to known centrifugal separators,
wherein the use of a large number of passages is excluded for
reasons depending essentially on the techniques used hitherto for
feeding each passage individually with the liquid mixture and for
discharging the separated constituents, the separator according to
this invention allows efficient use of any desired number of
separating passages. This is due, in particular, to the fact that
all the passages are fed with emulsion from a common admission
chamber or entrance manifold and emerge in a single outlet chamber
forming part of an exit manifold. The presence of a great number of
coaxial rows of passages of small diameter thus does not, in fact,
pose any constructional problem whatsoever. Indeed, apart from the
described nest of tubes, a multitude of separating passages may be
readily obtained in various ways, for example by means of an
annular honeycomb structure or by an assembly of juxtaposed
corrugated plates.
It will be noted that, in both embodiments of my invention, the
entrance and exit manifolds 13 (or 13, 18) and 19, 27 formed
between the generally frustoconical headers 6, 7 and the closed hub
3 converge radially outwardly toward the zones of the tubular
passages 2. On the outlet side, the increased radial pressure
differential due to this outward convergence promotes the
gravitation of the light fraction toward the central axis, thereby
enhancing the separation of the constituents. On the inlet side, at
least in the system of FIGS. 2 and 3, the progressive narrowing of
the chamber 13 increases the axial pressure differential driving
the liquid through the conduits 2 clustered about hub 3.
The distribution of a multitude of separating passages around a
central hub moreover allows these passages to revolve around the
rotational axis at a distance therefrom which is many times greater
than the diameter of the passages. Consequently, the effect of the
centrifugal force acting on the mixture present in each passage
does not vary notably across the section thereof, i.e., between the
point nearest to and the pont farthest from the rotational axis. It
thus becomes possible to avoid any substantial transverse
circulation of the emulsion in each passage, as would result from a
significant variation in centrifugal force therein and would
disturb the laminar flow which is necessary for ensuring
satisfactory centrifugal separation. The use of common admission
and discharge chambers or manifolds vented to the atmosphere as
described makes it possible to ensure in a particularly simple and
effective manner, owing to centrifugal force, a uniform feed of the
emulsion to the numerous separating passages, advance of the
emulsion in the passages during separation and discharge of the
separated constituents. As a matter of fact, it thus becomes
possible to vary the supply rate over a relatively wide range
without appreciably affecting the laminar flow of the emulsion or
the centrifugal separating effect, since the spontaneous
establishment of the above-described liquid levels allows a
self-regulating effect to be achieved during operation at different
feed rates. Moreover, since the movement of the emulsion and of the
separated constituents is ensured through centrifugal force only,
the use of separate pumping means, i.e., of a pump to force the
emulsion under pressure through the separator, is no longer
necessary. This allows a considerable simplification of the
auxiliary equipment of the separator and hence saves in the
equipment costs and running expenses of the separator.
The various advantages pointed out above may be illustrated by the
following example:
EXAMPLE
A separator such as shown in FIGS. 2 and 3, comprising a steel drum
with an outer diameter of 56 cm and a hub with a diameter of 40 cm,
includes an array of 830 tubes with an inner diameter of 1 cm.
Rotation of this drum at 2,000 r.p.m. allows a centrifugal
acceleration to be achieved which, depending on the distance of
each tube from the rotational axis of the drum, is about 900 to
1,250 greater than the acceleration due to gravity. The maximum
flow rate at which laminar flow and hence complete separation may
be achieved will depend from case to case on the size of the liquid
globules to be separated from the emulsion. Thus, for example, for
a tube length of 20 cm, the drum having the above dimensions and
rotating at 2,000 r.p.m. enables complete separation with flow
rates as high as 47 m.sup.3 /h when the size of the globules to be
separated is 0.03 mm. Similarly, the maximum flow rate for ensuring
complete separation of an emulsion comprising globules of 0.01 mm
would be about 4 m.sup.3 /h.
It may thus be readily seen that the described centrifugal
separator avoids the cited disadvantages of known separators in a
most simple manner. As a matter of fact, as was pointed out, this
is a direct consequence of the provision in a rotating drum, of a
multiplicity of separating passages with relatively small
cross-section, extending longitudinally in the drum, around a hub
of much larger diameter than that of the passages, between common
admission and outlet manifolds each communicating with the
atmosphere. Thanks to this particular arrangement, it thus becomes
possible to achieve, in a most economical manner, not only optimum
separating conditions but also a very high separating capacity with
a rotating drum of very simple and compact design.
The described separator may be readily applied in a widely varying
range of technical fields. Indeed, it no longer is necessary to
comprise, for each application, between the degree of separation
desired and the flow rate of the treated liquid mixture.
Thus, for example, my improved system may be used with advantage
for treating waste waters such as the water used for washing the
tanks of oil tankers or the effluents of steel-mills.
Moreover, the separator may be used in various industrial fields,
for example in industrial mineral chemistry and extraction.
Another important field of application of this separator is the
food processing industry. Thus, for example, it is most suitable
for the treatment of milk and vegetable oils or fish oils.
* * * * *