U.S. patent number 3,688,864 [Application Number 05/029,084] was granted by the patent office on 1972-09-05 for infinite dynamic damping loudspeaker systems.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Talbot American Corporation, New York, NY. Invention is credited to Reuben Guss.
United States Patent |
3,688,864 |
|
September 5, 1972 |
INFINITE DYNAMIC DAMPING LOUDSPEAKER SYSTEMS
Abstract
An infinite dynamic damping loudspeaker system includes at least
two similar loudspeakers which radiate from an enclosure in
response to the simultaneous receipt of the same signals. The
diaphragms of the loudspeakers are acoustically coupled by an air
chamber and a tuning duct connects the air chamber to the
atmosphere. The diaphragms vibrate in a phase such that they
produce the same phase of pressure changes on the air in the
chamber to provide mutual damping.
Inventors: |
Reuben Guss (New York, NY) |
Assignee: |
Talbot American Corporation, New
York, NY (N/A)
|
Family
ID: |
21847126 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/029,084 |
Filed: |
April 16, 1970 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
381/89; 381/349;
381/350; 381/351; 181/147; 181/145; 381/165; 381/186 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H04R
1/26 (20130101); H04R 1/2819 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H04R
1/24 (20060101); H04R 1/26 (20060101); H04R
1/28 (20060101); H04R 1/22 (20060101); G10k
013/00 (); H04r 001/28 () |
Field of
Search: |
;181/31B,32 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Richard B. Williamson
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Hane, Baxley & Spiecens
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. An infinite dynamic damping loudspeaker system occupying a
minimum of space comprising: a multiwall enclosure; at least first
and second substantially identical loudspeakers, each of said
loudspeakers including a diaphragm and a motor, the motors of said
loudspeakers being adapted to receive the same energizing signal so
that the motors are energized electrically in phase; means for
mounting said loudspeakers in said enclosure such that the axes of
said speakers are orthogonal, the same one surface of each of said
loudspeakers being acoustically coupled by an air chamber in such a
way that the same movement of the diaphragms of each of the
loudspeakers produces the same change of air pressure in the air
chamber whereby each diaphragm damps the other diaphragm and said
first loudspeaker directly radiates through an opening in the front
wall of said enclosure; a tubular tuning duct inertance element
extending inward from one of the walls of said enclosure for
connecting the air chamber to the region outside said enclosure to
minimize the size of said enclosure; a secondary chamber in said
enclosure; and a port in said enclosure for connecting said
secondary chamber to the region outside said enclosure, and said
second loudspeaker radiating into said secondary chamber.
2. The loudspeaker system of claim 1 wherein said port is in the
front wall of said enclosure.
3. The loudspeaker system of claim 1 wherein said port is in the
rear wall of said enclosure.
4. An infinite dynamic damping loudspeaker system occupying a
minimum of space comprising a multiwall enclosure divided into an
air chamber and a sound chamber, said enclosure having ports for
connecting said sound chamber to the region external to said
enclosure, at least first and second substantially identical
loudspeakers, each of said loudspeakers including a diaphragm and a
motor, the motors of said loudspeakers being adapted to receive the
same energizing signal so that the motors are energized
electrically in phase, and means for mounting said loudspeakers in
said enclosure such that the axes of said speakers are orthogonal,
the same one surface of each of said loudspeakers are acoustically
coupled by said air chamber in such a way that the same movement of
the diaphragms of each of the loudspeakers produces the same change
of air pressure in the air chamber whereby each diaphragm damps the
other diaphragm, and said loudspeakers radiate into said sound
chamber.
5. The loudspeaker system of claim 4 comprising four loudspeakers.
Description
This invention pertains to loudspeaker systems and more
particularly to such systems whose frequency response is very
low.
BACKGROUND
Experience shows that users of high fidelity equipment nowadays
demand smaller and smaller loudspeaker enclosures to fit the decor
of home environments such as the average living room. However, it
is well known that the smaller the size of the enclosure, the
higher becomes the resonance of the total system. Since the
resonant frequency of the loudspeaker relates directly to the low
frequency response of the total speaker system, it is seen that
small enclosure size and deep low frequency response are inversely
related.
There have been many efforts to obtain good low frequency response
from loudspeaker systems using small enclosures in the range of 2
to 3 cubic feet.
Presently, a popular small-enclosure loudspeaker system, commonly
known as an "acoustic suspension" system, employs a woofer with a
free air resonance of approximately 10 Hz. so that the trapped air
in the small enclosure raises the resonance to a relatively low 40
to 50 Hz. However, such systems when fully sealed create other
problems. In particular, the greatest problem is that of very low
efficiency. Such low efficiency is directly related to the fact
that despite the lower initial free air resonance of the woofer,
more power is required to have it perform in the bass region of the
audio spectrum within a small enclosure because the small air
volume resists the large excursions of the diaphragm required for a
low frequency reproduction.
Another solution to the problem has been proposed in U.S. Pat. No.
2,993,091 wherein two loudspeakers are employed with an enclosure,
one directly radiating loudspeaker and the other an inner
loudspeaker mounted in the enclosure immediately behind the
directly radiating loudspeaker. The inner loudspeaker damps the
diaphragm of the directly radiating loudspeaker by vibrating
sympathetically therewith. While such a system permits some
reduction in enclosure size, the optimum reduction is not
achieved.
THE INVENTION
It is a general object of the invention to provide an improved
loudspeaker system having a very small enclosure volume and a very
low frequency response.
It is another object of the invention to provide a very efficient
loudspeaker system having not only small enclosure volume but also
having a very low resonance and superior transient response.
Briefly, the invention contemplates a loudspeaker system having
infinite dynamic damping comprising an enclosure and at least first
and second substantially identical loudspeakers. The loudspeakers
are connected to be electrically energized in phase while the
diaphragms of the loudspeakers are acoustically coupled by an air
chamber to vibrate in a mechanical out-of-phase relation, i.e.,
similar movements of the diaphragms produce similarly phased
changes of air pressure in the chamber. In other words, an outward
excursion of the diaphragm of the first loudspeaker creates a
vacuum in the chamber and at the same time the outward excursion of
the diaphragm of the second loudspeaker also creates a vacuum in
the chamber. Thus, the second loudspeaker vacuum damps the first.
Similarly, an inward movement of the diaphragm of the first
loudspeaker raises the pressure in the chamber. At the same time,
the diaphragm of the second loudspeaker moves inward to also raise
the pressure. Thus, the second loudspeaker pressure damps the
first.
It should be noted that by infinite dynamic damping is meant the
inhibiting of free or distorting vibrations of the directly
radiating loudspeaker diaphragm which is directly proportional to
the amplitude of the audio signal energizing the loudspeaker over
the entire frequency range of the directly radiating
loudspeaker.
The loudspeaker system according to the invention has several
distinct advantages over previous systems. If two identical
"woofers" (bass loudspeakers) are used then the free air resonance
of the simultaneously energized woofers is one-half the free air
resonance of a single woofer. Therefore the frequency response of
the system is similarly lowered.
Secondly, since each woofer has its own "motor" (electromagnetic
structure of magnet and voice coil), two woofers used in accordance
with the invention have more power and greater efficiency than one
woofer.
Thirdly, the use of multiple woofers in as tight an air chamber as
possible provides for a greater vacuum/pressure influence of one
woofer diaphragm upon the other than would be possible in a large
enclosure because there is very much less air in proportion to the
total area of the woofer diaphragm than in larger conventional
enclosures. Accordingly, there is greater damping action and
superior transient response in the low frequency range.
Furthermore, such a loudspeaker system may use all walls of the
enclosure for mounting the speakers, and internal walls as well.
Accordingly, mere mechanical considerations do not control the size
of the enclosure.
Finally, the use of a duct and preferably a tube duct, permits the
enclosure to be even smaller because it acts as an inertance
element. In addition, the duct minimizes the criticality of the
match between enclosure size and the free air resonance of the
multiple woofers.
Other objects, features and advantages of the invention will be
apparent from the following detailed description when read with the
accompanying drawing which shows several loudspeaker systems
utilizing the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
In the drawing:
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of a two-woofer system in an
enclosure according to the invention;
FIG. 2 is an elevational section view taken on line 2--2 in FIG.
1;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevation view of the enclosure of FIG. 1;
FIG. 4 is an elevation view of a modified form of the loudspeaker
system and enclosure of FIG. 1;
FIG. 5 is an elevation section view taken on line 5--5 in FIG.
4;
FIG. 6 is a rear elevation view of the enclosure of FIG. 4;
FIG. 7 is a partially broken front elevation view of a four-woofer
loudspeaker system in an enclosure according to the invention;
FIG. 8 is an elevation section view taken on line 8--8 of FIG.
7;
FIG. 9 is a partially broken front elevation view of a modified
form of the loudspeaker system of FIG. 7;
FIG. 10 is an elevation section view, taken on line 10--10 of FIG.
9;
FIG. 11 is a partially broken front elevation view of a
modification of the loudspeaker system of FIG. 7;
FIG. 12 is an elevation section view taken on line 12--12 of FIG.
11;
FIG. 13 is a partially broken front elevation view of a nine-woofer
loudspeaker system according to the invention;
FIG. 14 is an elevation section view taken on line 14--14 of FIG.
13 generalized for clarity; and
FIG. 15 shows schematic diagrams for wiring the multiple
loudspeakers of the invention.
FIGS. 1 to 3 show a two-woofer loudspeaker system according to the
invention comprising a directly radiating tweeter 20, a directly
radiating mid-range speaker 22, a directly radiating woofer 24 and
an internal woofer 26 mounted in an enclosure 28. Both woofers
which are substantially identical are shown with the backs of their
diaphragms 25 and 27 in air chamber 30 which is connected to the
ambient region by tube duct 32. The front of the diaphragm 25 of
directly radiating woofer 24 faces a front opening of enclosure 28
while the front of diaphragm 27 of internal woofer 26 faces a
secondary chamber 34 which has output ports 36 and 38 facing the
front and rear of the enclosure, respectively.
Audio signal input to the speakers of the system is made via jacks
40 which are connected to the speakers by the usual signal leads
and cross-over networks (not shown). In FIG. 15 circuits A and B
show the connections of the woofers 24 and 26 to an eight ohm
source. Circuit A shows the woofers as four ohm speakers connected
in series; circuit B shows the woofers as sixteen ohm speakers
connected in parallel.
In operation both woofers 24 and 26 are simultaneously energized
with the same phase of the audio signal. Thus, as the diaphragm 25
of directly radiating woofer 24 moves outwardly creating a vacuum
in air chamber 30, so does diaphragm 27 of internal woofer 26 to
further increase the vacuum and vacuum damp the diaphragm of woofer
24. Similarly, when the diaphragm 25 moves inward raising the
pressure in air chamber 30, diaphragm 27 also moves inwardly to
further increase the pressure and pressure damp the diaphragm 25 of
directly radiating woofer 24. In other words, the woofers are
acoustically coupled by the air in chamber 30 and the mechanical
phases of the diaphragm movements are phased so that the movement
of one damps the movement of the other.
The primary source of the bass sound heard by the listener is from
the enclosure opening in the front of directly radiating woofer 24.
However, inner woofer 26, in addition to performing the damping
function, is a secondary source of the bass sound from ports 36 and
38. It should be realized that internal woofer 26 is also damped by
directly radiating woofer 24 so that its resonance and transient
response are the same and the secondary source of the bass sound is
as true as the primary source.
FIGS. 4 to 6 show an alternative embodiment of the two-woofer
loudspeaker system of FIGS. 1 to 3. Since there are considerable
similarities between the systems, primed reference numbers will be
used for like elements and only the differences will be discussed
in detail. In particular, there is no tweeter or mid-range speaker
so that the system is only a woofer system. Furthermore, the
internal woofer 26' radiates only to the rear of the enclosure via
port 38'.
FIGS. 7 and 8 show a four-woofer loudspeaker system according to
the invention comprising four substantially identical internal
woofers 100, 102, 104 and 106, direct radiating tweeter 108 and
direct radiating mid-range speaker 110 mounted in enclosure 112.
The backs of the diaphragms of all the woofers face air chamber 114
which acoustically couples the diaphragms. Air chamber 114
communicates with the ambient region via tube duct 116. The fronts
of the diaphragms of the woofers all face sound chamber 118 which
provides front radiating sound via output ports 120, 122, 124 and
126 in the front wall of the enclosure 112.
Circuit C of FIG. 15 shows the series combination of 8 ohm woofers
100 and 102, and the series combination of 8 ohm woofers 104 and
106 being fed in parallel from an 8 ohm source. Again, as for the
embodiments of FIGS. 1 to 6, each of the woofers is fed in the same
audio signal phase and the mechanical movements of the diaphragms
mutually damp each other via the acoustic couplings of air chamber
114.
The loudspeaker system of FIGS. 9 and 10 is similar to the
loudspeaker system of FIGS. 7 and 8. Accordingly, primed reference
characters will be used for like elements and only the differences
will be discussed. In particular, the fronts of the diaphragms of
the woofers now face air chamber 114' and the backs of these
diaphragms face sound chamber 118' which communicates with the
ambient region via ports such as 130 and 132 in the back wall of
enclosure 112'.
It should be realized that with respect to the system of FIGS. 7
and 8, the fronts on the diaphragms could face air chamber 114
without impairing the response of the system.
FIGS. 11 and 12 show another embodiment of a four-woofer
loudspeaker system comprising direct radiating woofers 150 and 152,
internal woofers 154 and 156, direct radiating tweeter 158 and
direct radiating mid-range speaker 160 mounted in enclosure 162.
Woofers 150 and 152 are mounted on the front wall 161 and woofers
154 and 156 are mounted on a bottom wall 163 of enclosure 164. The
backs of the diaphragms of all woofers face air chamber 164 which
provides the acoustic coupling. Air chamber 164 is connected via
tube duct 166 to the ambient region.
The woofers can be connected in the same way as shown in circuit C
of FIG. 15 to receive the audio signals in phase so that the
mechanical movements of their diaphragms mutually damp each other
via the acoustic couplings provided by air chamber 164.
FIGS. 13 and 14 show a nine-woofer loudspeaker system comprising
direct radiating woofers 200, 202 and 204, woofers 206, 208, 210,
212, 214 and 216, direct radiating tweeter 218 and mid-range
speaker 220 mounted in closure 222. Woofers 200, 202 and 204 are
mounted on front wall 224, woofers 206 and 208 are on side wall
226, woofers 210 and 212 on bottom wall 228 and woofers 214 and 216
on side wall 230. The backs of the diaphragms of all woofers face
air chamber 232 which is connected via tube duct 234 to the ambient
region.
Circuit D of FIG. 15 shows the wiring diagram of the 8-ohm woofers
connected to receive an audio signal of the same phase from an
8-ohm source (not shown). In particular, three branches, each
comprising three woofers connected in series, are connected in
parallel to the source.
Just as with all previous embodiments the woofers mutually damp
each other because of the acoustic coupling of air chamber 232.
It should be noted that each of the embodiments of the invention
employs a duct. Without a duct the size of the enclosure would have
to be more critically matched to the resultant free air resonance
of the multiple woofers. In addition, the duct permits the
enclosure to be made smaller. In fact, by using a combination of
the duct with multiple woofers the size of the enclosure can be
reduced to its smallest physical limits with a low frequency
response hitherto associated only with very large loudspeaker
enclosures and to do so with even superior transient response.
Although the size of the ducts is known from "Hi-Fi Loudspeakers
and Enclosures" by Abraham B. Cohen, published by John F. Rider,
Inc., New York Seventh Printing, 1966 and Catalog 165--M, issued by
the Jensen Manufacturing Division, The Muter Company, 5655 W. 73rd
Street, Chicago, Ill. 60638, such ducts are for conventional
enclosures and not for enclosures reduced to their smallest size.
These ultra-small enclosures involve a tighter, more critical
vacuum-pressure interaction among the woofers than would be true
for the large conventional enclosures.
While the invention has been described in detail with respect to
certain now preferred examples and embodiments of the invention, it
will be understood by those skilled in the art, after understanding
the invention, that various changes and modifications may be made
without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, and
it is intended, therefore, to cover all such changes and
modifications in the appended claims.
* * * * *