U.S. patent number 3,687,514 [Application Number 05/075,383] was granted by the patent office on 1972-08-29 for reduction of dispersion in multimode waveguide.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Bell Telephone Laboratories Incorporated. Invention is credited to Stewart Edward Miller, Stewart David Personick.
United States Patent |
3,687,514 |
Miller , et al. |
August 29, 1972 |
**Please see images for:
( Certificate of Correction ) ** |
REDUCTION OF DISPERSION IN MULTIMODE WAVEGUIDE
Abstract
Dispersion in multimode optical waveguides is due primarily to
the fact that the different modes propagate at different group
velocities. Traditionally, the approach has been to try to minimize
mode conversion and, thereby, to avoid the associated dispersive
effect. An alternative approach is now suggested which deliberately
increases the mode conversion opportunities along the wavepath such
that the energy is forced to propagate an equal length of time in
all the different modal configurations. This has the unexpected
effect of reducing the dispersion since all the energy tends to
arrive at the output more nearly at the same average time.
Inventors: |
Miller; Stewart Edward
(Middletown Township, Monmouth County, NJ), Personick; Stewart
David (Long Branch, NJ) |
Assignee: |
Bell Telephone Laboratories
Incorporated (Murray Hill, NJ)
|
Family
ID: |
22125361 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/075,383 |
Filed: |
September 25, 1970 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
385/28; 385/123;
65/402 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H01P
1/16 (20130101); G02B 6/14 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H01P
1/16 (20060101); G02B 6/14 (20060101); G02b
005/14 () |
Field of
Search: |
;350/96WG ;333/21 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Other References
marcatili "What Kind of Optical Fiber for Long-Distance
Transmission" S.P.I.E. Journal Vol. 8, No. 4, May, 1970, pp.
101-106. .
Marcuse et al. "Mode Conversion Caused by Diameter Changes of a
Round Dielectric Waveguide" The Bell System Technical Journal Vol.
48, No. 10, Dec. 1969, pp. 3,217-3,232..
|
Primary Examiner: Corbin; John K.
Claims
We claim:
1. In an electromagnetic wave system, a waveguide capable of
guiding optical wave energy at the frequency of interest in a
plurality of different modes of wave propagation having different
group velocities and of dissipating wave energy in the form of
unguided modes;
means for minimizing dispersion due to said difference in group
velocities comprising means longitudinally distributed along said
guide for enhancing the coupling among said guided modes while
minimizing the coupling among said guided modes and said unguided
modes.
2. The waveguide according to claim 1 wherein said means includes
changes in the diameter of said waveguide.
3. The waveguide according to claim 1 wherein said means includes
changes in the direction of the guide axis.
4. The waveguide according to claim 1 wherein said means has a
periodic variation equal to the sum of the beat wavelengths of
pairs of all the guided modes, plus or minus ten percent.
Description
This invention relates to multimode waveguides and, in particular,
to optical waveguides.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In the transmission of electromagnetic wave energy through a hollow
conductive pipe or other type of waveguide, it is well known that
the energy can propagate in one or more transmission modes, or
characteristic field configurations, depending upon the
cross-sectional size and shape of the particular guide, and upon
the operating frequency. Typically, at any given frequency, the
larger the guide size, the greater are the number of modes in which
the energy can propagate. Generally, it is considered desirable to
confine propagation to one particular mode chosen because its
propagation characteristics are favorable for the particular
application involved, and because propagation in more than one mode
can give rise to power loss, conversion-reconversion distortion and
other deleterious effects.
If the desired mode happens to be the so-called dominant mode, and
the wavelength of the wave energy is large enough, it is feasible
to restrict the cross-sectional dimensions of the guide so that no
modes other than the dominant mode can be sustained therein. This
expedient is not applicable, however, if the desired mode is not
the dominant mode, or if a guide of larger cross section is
prescribed in order to minimize attenuation, or for any other
reasons. However, because these oversized, or multimode waveguides,
are inherently capable of propagating more than one mode, they have
always been considered to be potentially troublesome. For example,
inasmuch as the different modes travel with different group
velocities, mode conversion introduces a relative delay in that
portion of the signal that is coupled to the other propagating
modes. This is most evident when pulses are transmitted, and
results in a broadening of the output pulse by a factor that is
proportional to the length of the wavepath.
In the past, every effort has been made to perfect the waveguide
and, thereby, to minimize mode conversion. In a paper by H. E. Rowe
and W. D. Warters, entitled "Transmission in Multimode Waveguide
With Random Imperfections, " published in the May 1962 issue of the
Bell System Technical Journal, pp. 1,031 - 1,170, the effects of
random geometric imperfections on the transmission of the TE
.sub.01 .degree. mode wave, propagating in a circular waveguide,
are studied and tolerances for these imperfections defined.
Because of the unique field configuration of some modes, it is
feasible to tailor the waveguiding structure in a manner to favor a
preferred mode. As an example, in the microwave and millimeter wave
portions of the frequency spectrum, the circular electric TE modes
can be effectively decoupled from the spurious TM modes by the
helical waveguiding configuration described in U.S. Pat. No.
2,848,695.
The advent of the laser as a source of coherent radiation at
optical wavelengths has substantially magnified the problems of
guiding electromagnetic wave energy. Because of the extremely small
wavelengths involved, none of the techniques considered above have
provided a practical means of obtaining efficient transmission.
Instead, new approaches and new techniques have been proposed for
dealing with the problems of multimoding, as illustrated by the
commonly assigned copending application by E. A. J. Marcatili, Ser.
No. 59,014, filed July 28, 1970.
All of the approaches to this problem, heretofore considered, have
either attempted to restrict propagation to only one mode, or to
perfect the waveguide so as to minimize coupling from the preferred
mode to other spurious modes.
Recognizing that it will be impractical if not impossible to
eliminate all causes of mode conversion, it is the broad objective
of the present invention to improve transmission through multimode
waveguiding structures by other means.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the present invention, it is shown that the
dispersion in an unavoidably imperfect multimode waveguide can be
reduced by deliberately enhancing the mode conversion processes in
the waveguide. Accordingly, in one embodiment of the invention,
random "imperfections " are deliberately introduced into the
waveguide. These include changes in the cross-sectional dimensions
of the guide and/or changes in the direction of the guide axis.
The inclusion of these discontinuities tends to more effectively
couple the wave energy among the various modes. The greater this
coupling, the more nearly all the energy will be distributed among
all the possible modes and, as a result, the time it takes for all
of the energy to traverse the guide is more nearly the same. Thus,
whereas a pulse of energy propagating along an ideal waveguide in
two different modes will arrive at the output end of the guide as
two pulses, separated in time by an interval proportional to the
length of the guide, the same energy pulse, propagating along a
guide of equal length, designed in accordance with the teachings of
the present invention, will arrive at the output end as a single
pulse whose energy is distributed among all the coupled modes and
whose width is proportional to the square root of the product of
the guide length and the coupling length. Since the latter
decreases as the degree of mode-to-mode coupling increases, the
resulting dispersion decreases correspondingly.
While random coupling among the modes tends to reduce the
dispersion, it also tends to increase losses due to the coupling of
some of the energy from guided to unguided (radiating) modes.
Accordingly, in a preferred embodiment of the invention, the
coupling is selectively restricted so as to couple primarily among
the guided modes. This coupling can be continuous, or included at
spaced intervals along the waveguide.
These and other features of the present invention will be more
readily understood from the following detailed description, taken
in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 shows, in block diagram, a long distance communication
system, and the effect of mode conversion upon a propagating
pulse;
FIGS. 2 and 3 show arrangements for producing diameter changes and
axial directional changes in a glass fiber;
FIG. 4 shows the mode distribution in a waveguide; and
FIG. 5 shows a preferred arrangement for producing diameter changes
in a glass fiber.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Referring to the drawings, FIG. 1 shows, in block diagram, a
communication system comprising a signal transmitter 10, a receiver
11, and a waveguide 12 connecting the transmitter to the receiver.
For the purposes of the following explanation, it is assumed that
waveguide 12 is capable of supporting only two propagating modes
M.sub.1 1 and M.sub.2 whose group velocities v.sub.1 and v.sub.2
are different, and that guide 12 is an ideal guide in that there is
no coupling between the two modes.
If a signal pulse in each of the two modes is applied,
simultaneously, at the transmitter end of guide 12, each mode will
propagate along the guide independently of the other and arrive at
the receiver end of the guide at a time determined by its group
velocity. Propagating at a velocity v.sub.1, the pulse in mode
M.sub.1 will arrive after a time t.sub.1 equal to L/v.sub.1, while
the pulse in mode M.sub.1 will arrive after a later time t.sub.2
equal to L/v.sub. 2, where L is the guide length. The time
difference, T, or the dispersion is equal to t.sub.2 - t.sub.1.
Because any practical guide is not perfect, there will, in fact, be
some coupling between the two modes so that energy tends to arrive
at the receiver distributed over the entire interval between
t.sub.1 and t.sub.2 producing an output pulse such as is given by
curve 13.
In a qualitative sense, the above is equally descriptive of what
occurs when the waveguide is excited in only one mode, but
additional modes are produced due to mode conversion along the
guide. In either event, the dispersion, due to the different group
velocities for the different modes, manifests itself by broadening
of the pulse by an amount which is proportional to the length of
the guide. Recognizing this, the thrust of the prior art has been
directed to means for perfecting waveguides so as to minimize node
conversion and, thereby, to reduce its deleterious effects, and to
means for absorbing the energy in the undesired modes so as to
minimize the interval over which reconversion could occur.
The present invention is based upon an entirely new insight into
the operation of waveguide. In brief, applicants view a multimode
waveguide as a multilane highway wherein traffic proceeds along the
different lanes at different velocities, corresponding to the
different group velocities for the several modes. In a prior art
waveguide, the energy in each of different modes tends to remain
within one of the lanes (modes) throughout the length of the guide,
with an occasional brief excursion (conversion) into one of the
other lanes (modes). For the most part, however, the energy in
prior art waveguides tends to remain primarily in its initial modal
configuration and to travel at a particular velocity, arriving at
the end of the guide at a different time than the small amount of
energy that has inadvertently been converted into some other
modes.
By contrast, in a waveguide in accordance with the present
invention, there is a deliberate interchange of lanes, in that the
energy in each mode is converted to each of the other modes and,
hence, ultimately all of the energy propagates at all of the
different mode velocities. Thus, on the average, energy initially
launched, or converted to each of the supported modes, propagates
at each of the other mode velocities, such that the energy in all
of the modes tends to arrive at the output end of the guide more
nearly at the same time. Qualitatively, it can be shown that the
resulting pulse width T of an input impulse is given by
T .alpha..sqroot.LL.sub.c (1)
where L is the guide length
and L.sub.c is the coupling length.
Since L.sub.c is inversely proportional to the mode coupling per
unit length, the greater the coupling, the smaller L.sub.c and the
narrower the output pulse.
FIG. 2 shows an arrangement for fabricating a glass fiber waveguide
for guiding optical wave energy. Typically, such fibers are drawn
from a bulk material by heating the glass in an oven and then
pulling on it. Thus, in FIG. 2 a piece of glass 20 extends into an
oven 21 and is drawn down at a velocity v. Since the diameter of
the drawn fiber is a function of the velocity at which it is drawn,
the velocity, in accordance with the prior art, is carefully
controlled in order to obtain a uniform fiber. This uniformity has
always been considered to be important since it was also known that
variations in the fiber diameter induce mode coupling. By contrast,
in accordance with the present invention, the velocity at which the
glass is drawn is deliberately modulated so as to create diameter
changes and, thereby, to enhance this coupling. Thus, in FIG. 2,
the glass is supported by a piezoelectric member 22 which is
energized by a signal derived from a noise source 23. An amplifier
24 may be included to provide additional drive, if required.
In operation, the piezoelectric member produces an axial
displacement .+-..DELTA.z of glass 20 in response to the signal
derived from the noise source. This displacement produces a change
in the drawing velocity which, in turn, modulates the fiber
diameter.
The modal configurations can, generally, be divided into two
classes. The first class is characterized by field configurations
that are symmetric about the guide axis. The second class is
characterized by asymmetric field configurations. While changes in
the diameter of the fiber enhances the coupling among the modes in
the respective classes, it does not provide for efficient coupling
between the two classes of modes. The latter is effectuated by
changes in the direction of the guide axis. In a system supportive
of wave energy polarized only along one direction, a ripple is
induced in the waveguiding structure in the plane of the guide
perpendicular to the direction of polarization. In a circular
symmetrical guide, supportive of wave energy polarized along
mutually perpendicular direction, ripples are induced in two
mutually perpendicular directions, resulting in a helical
waveguiding configuration. These directional changes are produced
by a modification of the pulling structure of FIG. 2. As
illustrated in FIG. 3, the piezoelectric member 22 of FIG. 2 is
replaced by four piezoelectric rods 31, 32, 33 and 34,
symmetrically disposed about the longitudinal axis of the glass rod
20. The rods are energized in pairs, 180.degree. out of phase, and
each pair is energized 90.degree. out of phase relative to the
other pair. To generate these signals, the signal derived from
noise source 23 is coupled to port 1 of a quadrature hybrid coupler
35 which divides it into two equal components in output ports 3 and
4. As is characteristic of a quadrature coupler, the two output
signals are, in addition, 90 .degree. out of phase relative to each
other.
Each of the two output signals, derived from ports 3 and 4, is
coupled respectively to a different amplifier 36 and 37. The
amplifiers, in addition to amplifying the signals, converts them to
a pair of balanced signals which are used to energize diametrically
opposite pairs of rods. Thus, the output signals from amplifier 36
are coupled to rods 31 and 33, while the output signals from
amplifier 37 are coupled to rods 32 and 34.
While the total effect upon the glass pulling operation is a
superposition of the effects produced by all the different
frequency signal components derived from noise source 23, for
purposes of explanation, the action of only one frequency component
will be considered. In particular, the instant at which the signal
component at amplifier 36 is zero is illustrated in FIG. 3.
Simultaneously, the signal at amplifier 37 is a maximum, with a
positive polarity signal applied across rod 32 and negative
polarity signal applied across rod 34. The effect produced thereby
is to induce an angular displacement of the glass axis by an amount
.theta..sub.2, in the plane of the rods. A quarter of a cycle
later, the signal at amplifier 37 is zero while the signal at
amplifier 36 is a maximum, producing an angular displacement
.theta..sub.1 in the plane of rods 31 and 33. This process
continues, producing a deflection-.theta. .sub.2 the next quarter
cycle and a deflection-.theta. .sub.1 a quarter cycle thereafter.
The overall effect is to generate a helical motion as the glass is
drawn, as indicated by curve 5 in FIG. 3. To induce both changes in
diameter as well as changes in the direction of the guide axis, a
common signal can be superimposed upon the four rods, or a separate
piezoelectric member, separately excited, can be employed. With
either arrangement, the modes within each of the two classes of
modes are coupled among themselves as a result of the diameter
changes, while interclass coupling is produced by changes in the
direction of the fiber axis.
The use of a noise source, as in FIGS. 2 and 3, produces random
intermodal coupling over the entire spectrum of modes.
Unfortunately, however, this includes the unguided modes as well as
the guided modes. While the latter continue to propagate along the
guide and are conserved, the unguided modes radiate energy and
constitute a loss to the system. It is apparent that in a guide of
any appreciable length, all the energy would eventually be lost
unless means are provided to prevent such coupling. Accordingly, in
a preferred embodiment of the invention, selective, rather than
random mode coupling is employed.
FIG. 4, included for purposes of explanation, shows a typical mode
distribution in a waveguide as a function of phase constant. In
general, there is a distribution of discrete guided modes M.sub.1,
M.sub.2, M.sub.3 and M.sub.4, having phase constants .beta..sub.1,
.beta..sub.2, .beta..sub.3 and .beta..sub.4, respectively. There
is, in addition, a continuum of radiating modes starting at a phase
constant .beta..sub.5 that is less than the phase constants of the
guided modes, as represented by the area bounded by curve 30.
In the random coupling arrangement described hereinabove, there is
coupling both among the guided modes, producing a useful result,
and among the guided and unguided modes, resulting in a loss to the
system. Accordingly, in a preferred embodiment of the invention,
the coupling is, advantageously, limited to only the guided modes
by going from a random to a deterministic coupling arrangement.
Since coupling will only occur between those modes whose beat
wavelength .lambda..sub.b approximates the spacial periodicity
.lambda..sub.m of the coupling mechanism along the wavepath, the
mode conversion process can be more carefully controlled by
restricting these spacial wavelengths to within those bands of
wavelengths which permit coupling primarily to guided modes and,
thereby, to minimize coupling to the unguided modes. Thus, to
couple among all of the guided modes indicated in FIG. 4, the
spacial wavelengths of the coupling means are confined to
approximately .+-.10 percent of ##SPC1##
FIG. 5 shows one arrangement for producing selective coupling in
accordance with the preferred embodiment of the invention. This
arrangement is basically the same as that shown in FIG. 2, modified
to include a bandpass filter in the excitation circuit driving the
piezoelectric member. Using the same identification numerals as in
FIG. 2, the apparatus shown in FIG. 5 includes a piece of glass 20,
secured at its upper end to piezoelectric member 22, and extending
at its lower end into oven 21. The piezoelectric member is
electrically energized by noise source 23 coupled thereto through
bandpass filter 50 and, optionally, an amplifier 24.
As indicated hereinabove, the diameter of the drawn fiber is
related to the pulling velocity. More particularly, the
relationship between diameter and velocity is given by
where n is approximately equal to one-half.
Substituting this value for n in equation (3) gives
The instantaneous displacement, z, produced by the piezoelectric
member, at a frequency .omega. is
z = z.sub.p sin .omega.t , (5)
where z.sub.p is the peak displacement, which varies as a function
of the amplitude of the electrical excitation.
The incremental velocity v.sub.m superimposed on the fiber is given
by the time derivative of the displacement, or v.sub.m = dz/dt =
z.sub.p .omega. cos .omega.t = v.sub.mp cos .omega.t .
The instantaneous fiber drawing velocity is then given by
v = v.sub.o + v.sub.m , (7)
where v.sub.o is the average pulling velocity.
For an increase in diameter 2a in a fiber having an average
diameter 2d, the ratio of the peak velocity to the average velocity
is
for
a/d << 1.
From (8), we derive
Substituting for v.sub.mp from Equation (9), and solving for
z.sub.p, we obtain
where
.lambda..sub.m = v.sub.o /f is the mechanical or spacial wavelength
of the diameter change along the fiber introduced by the electrical
drive signal of frequency f.
Thus, knowing both the desired beat wavelengths, .lambda..sub.b,
from Equations (2), and the average drawing velocity, v.sub.o, the
spacial wavelengths, .lambda..sub.m, of the diameter changes and
the drive signal frequencies are defined.
As a numerical example, we assume a fiber having a diameter 2d = 6
.mu.m, being drawn at average rate of 2 ft/sec or 0.61 m/sec. Using
Table I on page 3203 of the article by D. Marcuse entitled "Mode
Conversion Caused by Surface Imperfections of a Dielectric Slab
Waveguide," published in the December 1969 issue of the Bell System
Technical Journal, we find that we can obtain one hundred percent
coupling between modes with a coupling length D equal to 30,000
.mu.m for a change in fiber radius a when a = (40 .sup..
(3).sup.2)/(30,000) = 0.012.mu.m.
The constant 40 used above is an approximation of the values given
in the column headed ad/d.sup. 2 in Table I of the above-identified
article for a refractive index difference between the fiber core
and its cladding of 1 percent; i.e., n.sub.g = 1.01.
For any particular beat wavelength .lambda..sub.b, which is a
function of the signal frequency and the fiber diameter, the
longitudinal displaced z.sub.p that must be produced can now be
computed using Equation (10). From the relationship
f = v.sub.o /.lambda..sub.m , (11)
we can also compute the optimum frequency of the drive signal.
Assuming a beat wavelength of 200 .mu.m, the drive signal frequency
is approximately 3,000 Hertz. Thus, bandpass filter 50 has one
passband centered at 3,000 Hertz, and amplifier 24 delivers enough
voltage to piezoelectric member 22 to produce a peak-to-peak
longitudinal displacement of .+-. 0.25.mu.m. A similar calculation
is then performed for all the other pairs of modes, thus fully
defining the passband characteristic of filter 50 and amplifier
24.
A similar analysis can be carried out to produce directional
changes in the guide axis for coupling between classes of modes, if
required.
It should be noted that there may be an overlapping of beat
wavelengths so as to couple between some of the unguided modes.
That is, the beat wavelengths calculated from Equations (2) may
result in coupling between modes M.sub.1, M.sub.2, M.sub.3 and
M.sub.4, and inadvertently among some unguided modes within curve
30. This, however, will be significantly less than the degree of
coupling that would be obtained if the coupling was purely
random.
While the invention has been described in connection with glass
fibers for guiding optical waves, the principles of the invention
are equally applicable in connection with millimeter and microwave
guidance systems. Thus, in all cases it is understood that the
above-described arrangements are illustrative of but a small number
of the many possible specific embodiments which can represent
applications of the principles of the invention. Numerous and
varied other arrangements can readily be devised in accordance with
these principles by those skilled in the art without departing from
the spirit and scope of the invention.
* * * * *