U.S. patent number 3,686,385 [Application Number 05/112,990] was granted by the patent office on 1972-08-22 for formation of elastic and high-tenacity fibers from butene-1 homopolymers and copolymers.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Mobil Oil Corporation. Invention is credited to Charles L. Rohn.
United States Patent |
3,686,385 |
Rohn |
August 22, 1972 |
FORMATION OF ELASTIC AND HIGH-TENACITY FIBERS FROM BUTENE-1
HOMOPOLYMERS AND COPOLYMERS
Abstract
Fibers having properties of high elasticity or high tenacity are
formed by drawing from the melt polybutene-1 or a copolymer of
butene-1 with up to 20 mole per cent propylene or ethylene and
converting the drawn fiber to crystalline Form I, in the case of
elastic fibers. The degree of elasticity or tenacity depends upon
the draw down ratio and the crystallinity of the polymer used, and,
in the case of high tenacity fibers, the melt temperature at the
die orifice.
Inventors: |
Rohn; Charles L. (Somerville,
NJ) |
Assignee: |
Mobil Oil Corporation
(N/A)
|
Family
ID: |
22346963 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/112,990 |
Filed: |
February 5, 1971 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
264/164;
526/348.1; 264/210.8 |
Current CPC
Class: |
D01F
6/30 (20130101); D01F 6/04 (20130101); C08L
23/20 (20130101); C08L 2203/12 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
D01F
6/04 (20060101); D01F 6/28 (20060101); C08L
23/00 (20060101); C08L 23/20 (20060101); B29c
017/02 (); B28b 003/20 () |
Field of
Search: |
;260/88.2
;264/176F,21F,168,164,342RE |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
882,178 |
|
Nov 1961 |
|
GB |
|
124,700 |
|
Jul 1947 |
|
AU |
|
Other References
"Spinning and Properties of Polyolefin Fibers" by Oya et al. .
"Sen-i to Kogyo" Vol. 2 (7) pp. 516-23 (1969) Japan.
|
Primary Examiner: Woo; Jay H.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A process for forming fibers having properties of elasticity or
high tenacity which comprises melt drawing from a die butene based
polymer selected from the group consisting of tactic polybutene-1,
tactic random copolymers of butene-1 and up to 20 mole per cent
ethylene, and tactic random copolymers of butene-1 and up to 20
mole per cent propylene, at a draw down ratio of between about 10
and about 300, at a melt temperature between about 120.degree.C.
and 270.degree.C., said butene based polymer having a crystallinity
between about 30 and about 65 and a melt index of 0.4 or less to
about 20;
in the case of forming elastic fibers, said draw down ratio being
between about 10 and about 50 and said fiber being converted from
Form II to Form I at ambient temperatures; and
in the case of preparing high tenacity fibers, the relationship
between the variables being as follows:
2. The process of claim 1 wherein said butene based polymer is
polybutene-1 homopolymer.
3. The process of claim 1 wherein said butene based polymer is a
copolymer of 92 mole per cent butene-1 with 8 mole per cent
ethylene.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention is directed to a method for forming elastic or
high-tenacity fibers from polybutene-1 or copolymers of butene-1
with ethylene or propylene.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Processes for making elastic fibers from polypropylene all appear
to call for a heating treatment (annealing) step, sometimes with
additional draw down in the cold or using a polymer containing an
azido cross-linking agent. For example, U. S. Pat. No. 3,256,258
calls for spinning a polypropylene fiber and heat treating it at a
temperature of 105.degree.C. - 160.degree.C. U. S. Pat. No.
3,323,190 describes a process in which polypropylene is partially
drawn from the melt, cooled, heat treated at 135.degree. C. -
150.degree.C. and thereafter further drawn 40 to 80 per cent. A
process for melt spinning polypropylene while drawing down into
fibers and then subjecting the fibers to heat treatment under
non-stretching conditions at a temperature above 85.degree.C. but
below the melting point of the polymer is described in U. S. Pat.
No. 3,330,897. U. S. Pat. No. 3,432,590 calls for a process of
producing elastic polypropylene fibers which involves melt
spinning, stretching, cold drawing, heat treating, and finally
further cold drawing. U. S. Pat. No. 3,361,859 describes a process
for spinning and drawing polypropylene and then cooling the fiber
in a gaseous medium at a temperature decreasing with the distance
from the spinneret, according to a time-temperature formula. In U.
S. Pat. No. 3,377,415, there is described a process for spinning
and heat treating polypropylene which calls for the addition of a
azido cross-linking agent prior to spinning. U. S. Pat. No.
3,382,306 calls for formation of elastic polypropylene film which
involves extruding and drawing the film quenching and heat
treating. U. S. Pat. No. 3,485,906 calls for a process similar to
that of U. S. Pat. No. 3,377,415 except that an azido cross-linking
agent is added to the polypropylene prior to fiber formation.
In Sen'i To Kogyo, 2(7), 516-23 (1969) there appears a review
article on polyolefin fibers, based upon a lecture by Oya and
Kitao. Although these authors discuss polybutene-1 fibers
(relatively briefly) prepared by spin-drawing, they neither discuss
nor appear to recognize the importance and significance of the
correlation of polymer crystallinity, melt temperature, and draw
down ratio to obtain elastic fibers or high tenacity fibers. The
present invention discloses to this important correlation. The
present inventor has further discovered that fibers drawn from a
die must be converted from Form II to Form I, in order to obtain
elastic fibers. The authors are silent on this point. The highest
tenacity (g./denier) reported by the authors for polybutene-1 is
2.about.4. The applicant, on the other hand, defines methods for
preparing such fibers having tenacities as high as 15g./denier.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a process for forming fibers having
properties of elasticity or high tenacity which comprises melt
drawing polybutene-1 or copolymers of butene-1 with propylene or
ethylene and converting to crystalline Form I. The degree of
elasticity or tenacity is a function of draw down ratio and the
crystallinity of the polymer, and in the case of high tenacity
fibers, on melt temperature at the die.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
In the drawings,
FIG. 1 presents a curve showing the relationship between draw down
ratio and elongation to break for elastic fibers formed from
polybutene of 53.5 per cent crystallinity.
FIG. 2 shows a curve defining the relationship between the
crystallinity of polybutene-1 and the elongation at break.
FIG. 3 presents a curve showing the relationship between the
stress-strain extension and recovery of a fiber prepared from
polybutene-1 having 53.5 per cent crystallinity.
FIG. 4 shows a similar stress-strain relationship of a fiber
prepared from polybutene-1 having a crystallinity of 61 per
cent.
FIG. 5 presents a curve showing the short time set and per cent
extension for fibers prepared from polybutene having various
crystallinities.
FIG. 6 presents a curve showing the relationship between the draw
down ratio of polybutenes of high crystallinity and medium
crystallinity and the crystallite orientation index.
FIG. 7 presents curves showing the relationship between tensile
strength (and tenacity) and draw down ratio and melt index (M.I.)
of polybutenes drawn at a melt temperature of 190.degree.C.
FIG. 8 presents curves showing the relationship between tensile
strength (and tenacity) and draw down ratio and melt temperature of
a polybutene-1 having a melt index of 0.4.
DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS
The polymers used in preparing the fibers in accordance with this
invention are called, generically herein, butene-1 based polymer.
The term "butene-1 based polymer" is used to mean tactic
polybutene-1, tactic random copolymers of butene-1 and up to 20
mole per cent ethylene, and tactic random copolymer of butene-1 and
up to 20 mole per cent propylene. These polymers and copolymers are
prepared using conventional Ziegler-Natta polymerization processes.
A particularly feasible process is carried out using solution
polymerization as described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,362,940. It is to be
understood, however, that the method of making the butene-1 based
polymer is not a critical factor herein, so long as the polymers
are highly tactic and contain some crystallinity.
The fibers are readily formed by extruding the butene-1 based
polymer through a small die orifice and drawing down the extrudate
while still in the molten state.
ELASTIC FIBERS
After the fiber is formed and is cooled to the solid state, in
preparing elastic fibers, it is in the Form II crystallinity state.
It must then be converted to the Form I crystalline state to form
elastic fibers, in accordance with this invention. The
transformation from Form II to Form I is carried out at room
temperature (25.degree.-30.degree.C.) and usually takes from a few
days up to as long as about 10 days. If the transformation is
carried out at temperatures below 25.degree.C. or above
30.degree.C. the transformation is much slower. Accordingly,
annealing the fiber at elevated temperatures, as called for by the
prior art, is detrimental to the process of this invention. The
transformation from Form II to Form I can be carried out in a
matter of about 5 minutes if the fiber is subjected to pressures in
the order of about 30,000 p.s.i. If the draw down to form fiber is
carried out using a copolymer of butene-1 and 5-9 mole per cent
propylene, as is described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,464,962, the
transformation from Form II to Form I is extremely rapid. In fact,
the transformation is so rapid that crystalline Form II is
virtually undetectable in the freshly formed fiber.
The degree of elasticity can be varied over a wide range depending
upon the draw down ratio used and the crystallinity of the polymer.
In FIG. 1, a curve is presented showing the relationship between
draw down ratio and the elongation to break of fibers formed from
polybutene-1 having 53.5 per cent crystallinity, based upon a
series of runs at various draw down ratios. As the draw down ratio
is increased, the elongation decreases, i.e., the fiber becomes
less elastic and tends to become more tenacious. There appears to
be a minimum elongation of about 15-20 per cent even when draw down
ratio is increased well above about 50. In general, elastic fibers
are prepared using a draw down ratio between about 10 and about 50.
The high tenacity fibers, on the other hand, are obtained using
draw down ratios between about 10 and about 300, as discussed
hereinafter and dependent on relationship between variables.
As has been indicated herein before, the properties of the finished
fiber are also dependent upon the crystallinity of the butene based
polymer used. This is shown in FIG. 2 which presents a curve
showing the relationship between the crystallinity and the per cent
elongation to break of fibers prepared from polybutene-1 polymers
having varying degrees of crystallinity using a draw down ratio of
about 13. It will be noted that, as crystallinity decreases, the
elongation increases. This would appear to indicate that if a high
elastic fiber is desired, it can be more conveniently prepared from
a butene-1 based polymer of relatively low crystallinity. For
comparison purposes, the fiber was made from polypropylene by
extruding and drawing the molten polymer to a draw down ratio of
12, as described in U. S. Pat. No. 3,323,190. The fibers, after
draw down, were heat treated for 10 minutes at 140.degree.C. and
then cold drawn 100 per cent. The fiber was elongated 65 per cent
and permitted to relax. The fiber recovered 84 per cent of its
original length. Stress-strain extension and recovery with the
polypropylene fiber shows that the degree of set is much higher
(approximately 16 per cent) for the polypropylene fiber than for
polybutene-1 fiber.
A conventional method for measuring the elasticity of a fiber is by
means of the so-called stress-strain relationship. This is
demonstrated in FIGS. 3 and 4.
FIG. 3 presents the stress-strain relationship of a fiber prepared
at a draw down ratio of 10, at a melt temperature of 190.degree.C.,
using polybutene-1 having crystallinity of 53.5 per cent. The data
on the curve shown in FIG. 3 were obtained by stretching the fiber
to a point below its break point while noting the amount of stress
to give a given degree of strain, i.e., per cent of stretch or
elongation. Curve A shows this relationship while stretching the
polybutene fiber and Curve B shows the relationship as stress is
removed and the fiber is permitted to relax. It will be noted that
the per cent recovery of the fiber after stress was quite high.
Indeed, within 24 hours the fiber has relaxed to its original
length. The measurements shown in FIG. 3 were made at 2 minutes
after relaxation of the fiber.
FIG. 4 presents a stress-strain relationship of a fiber prepared
from polybutene-1 having 61 per cent crystallinity using a draw
down ratio of 10, at a melt temperature of 190.degree.C. Curve C
shows the relationship while stress is being applied and Curve D
shows the relationship upon relaxation. It will be noted again that
the amount of recovery after 2 minutes was very high. It is also
noteworthy that in comparing FIGS. 3 and 4 the fiber prepared from
a more highly crystalline polybutene could be stretched to a lesser
degree than that prepared from a less crystalline polybutene,
although the recovery was greater.
The recovery and "short time" set of elastic fibers made in
accordance with this invention was measured at different amounts of
stretching. The property of set is the ability of the fiber to
return to its original length when it is relaxed after being
subjected to single or repeated stresses. In this work, set was
determined two minutes after the stretching force was relaxed. It
has been found that by increasing the crystallinity of the fiber,
the amount of short time set for extensions up to 50 per cent is
decreased. FIG. 5 presents curves showing the relationship between
the short time set and per cent extension of fibers prepared at a
draw down ratio of 10, at a melt temperature of 190.degree.C., with
polybutenes of different crystallinities. Curve E was obtained
using polybutene having 33 per cent crystallinity. Curve F was
obtained from a polybutene having a crystallinity of 53.5 per cent
and Curve G was obtained using a polybutene having a crystallinity
of 61 per cent. As shown in FIG. 5 the fibers prepared from
polybutenes of lower crystallinity tend to have greater short time
sets. The short time sets of these fibers, however, are not
permanent and within 16-24 hours recover completely to their
original length.
A series of fibers were prepared using polybutene-1 homopolymers
having varying degrees of crystallinity and using varying draw down
ratios. Stretch, recovery, and tensile data for fibers prepared
from these polymers are set forth in Table I.
TABLE I
Poly(butene-1) Homopolymer
Instant- Tensile Draw Stretch aneous Breaking Down Elong.,
Recovery, Strength, Modulus (psi) initial Ratio % % psi
initial20%Elong.
__________________________________________________________________________
15/1 117 98.0 13,400 32,800 3,500 15/1 95 98.0 14,300 32,800 3,500
15/1 90 98.0 15,200 32,800 3,000 20/1 62 96.0 20,400 41,500 11,600
23/1 55 97.0 51,900 45,900 8,400 44/1 25 98.0 57,000 -- --
__________________________________________________________________________
Similarly, fibers were prepared from a copolymer prepared from 92
mole per cent butene-1 and 8 mole per cent ethylene, said copolymer
having a crystallinity of about 39 per cent, at various draw down
ratios. Pertinent data for these fibers are set forth in Table
II.
TABLE II
8 Mole % Ethylene-92 mole % Butene-1 Copolymer
Stretch Instantaneous Draw-down Elong., Recovery, Tensile Breaking
Ratio % % Strength, psi.
__________________________________________________________________________
6/1 150 96.2 11,800 10/1 71 96.0 25,400 15/1 78 95.0 56,000 28/1 36
94.0 99,000
__________________________________________________________________________
ELASTIC VS. HIGH TENACITY FIBER
It has been found that by following the operations within the
parameters of this invention, there is a correlation between the
crystalline orientation index and the draw down ratio which appears
to be independent of the crystallinity. The curve in FIG. 6 was
obtained from aszimuthal beams on the (110) reflection of Form I
modification of polybutene-1 for fibers drawn in accordance with
this invention. On the curve in FIG. 6, there is plotted the F110
vs. the square root of the draw down ratio. In this work, a portion
of the curve between A and B represents the area for elastic
fibers. The portion of the curve from B to C represents the area
for high tenacity fibers.
HIGH TENACITY FIBERS
There are two main factors in addition to draw down ratio (DDR)
that affect the tenacity of polybutene based polymer fibers. These
are, melt index (MI) of the polymer and the melt temperature in the
die. As is well known to those familiar with the art, draw down
ratio is the ratio between the diameter of the die orifice to the
diameter of the final fiber. Tensile strength and tenacity are
related by the following formula:
FIG. 7 shows how the tenacity (tensile strength) of polybutene
fibers increase with increasing M.I. when drawn over a range of DDR
at 190.degree.C. melt temperature. In general, the highest tenacity
fiber is obtained with the lowest M.I. material for a given melt
temperature and maximum DDR. For example, a 0.4 M.I. fiber and a 5
M.I. fiber, both drawn at a DDR of 140 and melt temperature of
190.degree.C., have tenacities of 14 g./denier and 4 g./denier,
respectively.
Increasing temperature affects the tenacity of polybutene fibers in
a similar way that M.I. does. FIG. 8 shows how the tenacity of 0.4
M.I. polybutene fiber decreases with increasing melt temperature.
For each isotherm, the tenacity increases linearly with increasing
DDR, and then reaches a plateau or upper limit. This limit
decreases with increasing melt temperature.
Butene based polymer fibers with tenacities greater than 4
g./denier can only be made within certain ranges of M.I. and melt
temperatures. These ranges are specified in the following
table.
CONDITIONS FOR MAKING PB-1 FIBERS WITH TENACITIES ABOVE 4
G./DENIER
Melt Temperature M.I. Range, .degree. C. Minimum DDR
__________________________________________________________________________
20 122-180 170 15 122-185 165 10 122-190 155 5122-210 150 3.6
122-220 50 1.0 122-273 20 0.4 and less 122-273 14
__________________________________________________________________________
The reason 4 g./denier was taken as a lower limit of tenacity is
because conventional fiber spinning processes can be used which
will make poly(butylene) fibers with tenacities between 2-4
g./denier. Also, conditions exist for the melt drawing process that
will produce fibers in this tenacity range. For example, polybutene
fiber with M.I. of 5 and drawn at a melt temperature of
240.degree.C. and a maximum DDR has a tenacity of 3.1 g./denier and
a break elongation of 47 percent Note that these tensile properties
are similar to those of the poly(butylene) fibers reported on page
20 of the translation of article Spinning and Properties of
Poly(olefin) Fibers by Seigo Oya and Tashio Kitao. (p. 522 of the
original Japanese article.)
As will be noted from the foregoing description, fibers can be
prepared having a wide range of elasticity and tenacity properties
by the process of this invention. Thus, the crystallinity and draw
down ratios can be selected to give a desired property depending
upon the intended end use. If dimensional stability is the primary
requirement, such as in the case of men's suits or tailored
clothing, then the available stretch levels should be 20-30 per
cent. On the other hand, if comfort is the primary requirement, as
in the case of sportswear, the stretch level should be about 25-40
per cent. Tensioned slacks with foot stirrups use more of the
available fabric stretch than any other outer wear garment. The
stretch level for such slacks should be about 40-50 per cent.
The fibers produced by the process of this invention can also be
used to make ropes. If high strength is required, the ropes should
be made from fibers having high tenacity. If, on the other hand, a
rope is desired that has a certain amount of "give", as in the case
of safety lines or tow ropes, then elasticity would be a more
desirable factor at the expense of lesser tenacity.
SUMMARY
In general in reducing fibers from butene based polymer, in
accordance with this invention, the draw down ratio can be between
about 10 and about 300. The melt temperature can be between about
120.degree.C. and about 270.degree.C. The butene based polymer can
have a crystallinity of between about 30 per cent and about 65 per
cent and a melt index of between about 0.4 or less and about 20. In
the preparation of elastic fibers, the draw down ratio will be
between about 10 and about 50 and the F.sub.110 will be between
about 0.5 and 0.965. In the case of high tenacity fibers, the
correlation between variables will be as tabulated
hereinbefore.
Although the present invention has been described in conjunction
with preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that
modifications and variations may be resorted to without departing
from the spirit and scope thereof, as those skilled in the art will
readily understand. Such variations and modifications are
considered to be within the purview and scope of the appended
claims.
* * * * *