U.S. patent number 3,682,256 [Application Number 05/037,901] was granted by the patent office on 1972-08-08 for method for eliminating wear failures of well casing.
Invention is credited to Charles A. Stuart.
United States Patent |
3,682,256 |
Stuart |
August 8, 1972 |
METHOD FOR ELIMINATING WEAR FAILURES OF WELL CASING
Abstract
A method for eliminating wear failures of the casing of a well
borehole adapted to be extended into a subterranean earth formation
by determining where casing wear takes place, quantifying casing
wear continuously, designing the casing for wear, reducing the
amount of wear, and replacing casing worn to the tolerable
limit.
Inventors: |
Stuart; Charles A. (Metairie,
LA) |
Family
ID: |
21896969 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/037,901 |
Filed: |
May 15, 1970 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
175/40;
73/152.57; 73/152.59; 166/254.1 |
Current CPC
Class: |
E21B
47/00 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
E21B
47/00 (20060101); E21b 047/10 () |
Field of
Search: |
;73/151 ;166/254,255
;175/40,50 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Purser; Ernest R.
Claims
I claim as my invention:
1. A method of determining the force-onto-the-wall by tubing means
adapted to be extended down a well borehole adapted to be extended
into a subterranean earth formation comprising the steps of:
drilling a well borehole into said formation;
directionally surveying where angle changes take place in said well
bore;
determining the magnitude of the angle changes;
installing a tubing means in the well borehole;
determining the tension of the tubing means at the angle changes;
and
determining the force-onto-the-wall at the angle changes by said
tubing means using the predetermined tension and magnitude of the
angle changes.
2. A method of quantifying wear of first tubing means, extended
into a subterranean earth formation, by a second tubing means
adapted to be extended down said first tubing means, said method
comprising the steps of:
drilling a well borehole into said formation;
directionally surveying where angle changes take place in said well
bore;
determining the magnitude of the angle changes within said well
borehole;
installing said first tubing means in said well borehole in fixed
relationship thereto;
drilling below said first tubing means in said well borehole;
extending said second tubing string down said first tubing
string;
determining the tension of the second tubing means at the
predetermined angle changes in said well borehole;
determining, via the predetermined tension and magnitude of angle
changes, the force-onto-the-wall of the first tubing means by the
first tubing means;
quantifying the amount of first tubing means wear in the interval
of each angle change using force-onto-the-wall,
coefficient-of-wear, and time; and
accumulating the amount of wear and wall worn away of the first
tubing means casing while undertaking operations in said well
borehole below said first tubing means.
3. A method for eliminating wear failure of first tubing means
adapted to be extended into a subterranean earth formation, a
second tubing means adapted to be extended down into said first
tubing means after said first tubing means is installed in said
well borehole, said method comprising the steps of:
drilling a well borehole that is to be cased;
directionally surveying where angle changes take place in said well
borehole;
determining the magnitude of each angle change between at least two
survey stations;
installing said first tubing means in said well borehole in fixed
relationship thereto;
drilling below said well borehole into said formation;
extending said second tubing means down said first tubing
means;
determining the tension of the second tubing means at said angle
changes;
determining via the predetermined tension and magnitude of angle
changes the force-onto-the-wall of the first tubing means by the
second tubing means, thereby determining intervals where first
tubing means wear will be concentrated;
quantifying the amount of first tubing means wear at each angle
change via the predetermined force-onto-the-wall, coefficient of
wear, and time;
accumulating the amount of wear and wall worn away of the first
tubing means while undertaking operations below it; and
suspending operations when the tolerable limit of the first tubing
means is reached.
4. The method of claim 3 including the step of determining the
days-to-failure of the first tubing means for a given projected
tension of the second tubing means prior to drilling the borehole,
thereby determining where first tubing means wear will be
concentrated and thereby determining the time when the tolerable
limit will be reached.
5. The method of claim 3 including the step of running a reaming
means down said well borehole prior to installing said first tubing
means therein; and
reaming via said reaming means, said well borehole at a plurality
of said intervals where wear will be concentrated and where high
angle changes exist to thereby reduce the magnitude of said angle
changes.
6. The method of claim 3 wherein the step of determining the
force-onto-the-wall of said first tubing means by the second tubing
means includes the step of determining the force-onto-the-wall by
taking the product of twice times the sine of one-half the angle
change of said well borehole times the tension of said angle
change.
7. The method of claim 3 wherein the step of installing the first
tubing means includes the step of providing first tubing means
having a wall with a thickness, adjacent to at least some of said
intervals where wear will be concentrated, greater than the
thickness of the wall of the first tubing means either just above
or below said interval.
8. The method of claim 3 wherein the step of installing the first
tubing means includes the step of optimizing the first tubing means
for wear with respect to wall thickness by placing joints of
greater wall thickness opposite the intervals where wear will be
concentrated and are involved in the optimization.
9. The method of claim 3 wherein the step of installing the first
tubing means includes the step of providing said first tubing means
with a wall having a higher grade of material, adjacent to at least
some of said intervals where wear will be concentrated, than the
grade of material of the wall of the casing string either just
above or below said interval.
10. The method of claim 3 including the steps of:
extending said second tubing means down said well borehole within
said first tubing means; and
providing stabilizers on said second tubing means that are
selectively spaced therealong so as to be adjacent to said
intervals where wear will be concentrated in said well borehole and
are adapted to stabilize the force of said second tubing means on
the wall of said first tubing means.
11. The method of claim 3 and in addition deflecting said borehole
to reach a target, the point at which said borehole is deflected
being located a sufficient distance below the last casing shoe to
permit reducing the angle of change of the borehole by string
reaming.
12. The method of claim 3 and in addition optimizing the
installation of the first tubing means by placing joints of higher
grade opposite the intervals where wear is concentrated.
13. The method of claim 3 and in addition installing an inner
tubing means as a substitute for said first tubing means at
intervals where wear is concentrated.
14. The method of claim 13 wherein said inner tubing means is
retrievable.
15. The method of claim 3 wherein the wear on the first tubing
means is reduced by using a metal less dense than steel for forming
said second tubing means.
16. The method of claim 3 wherein said second tubing means
comprises a wire line and the wear on the first tubing means is
eliminated by installing a third tubing means in the borehole prior
to running said wire line in the borehole.
17. The method of claim 3, and in addition optimizing the
installation of the first tubing means by installing tubing means
having increased physical properties opposite intervals where wear
is concentrated.
18. The method of claim 3 wherein the volume of the first tubing
means worn away is quantified by mathematically calculating the
area of the crescent worn in the first tubing string.
19. The method of claim 3 wherein the wear on the first tubing
means is reduced by reducing the load of the second tubing means on
the first.
20. The method of claim 3 wherein the borehole is directionally
surveyed at substantially 30 ft. intervals where angle changes
occur.
21. The method of claim 3 wherein said second tubing means
comprises a drill string having two stabilizers disposed on each
joint of drill pipe, said stabilizers being positioned at intervals
where casing wear will be concentrated, one of said stabilizers on
each joint of pipe being disposed at the middle of the joint, the
other stabilizer being disposed at the end of the joint.
22. The method of claim 21 wherein said stabilizers include an
internal bearing.
23. The method of claim 3 wherein the wear on the first tubing
means is reduced by reducing the coefficient of wear.
24. The method of claim 23 wherein the coefficient of wear is
reduced by using a second tubing means having a plated outer
surface adjacent the intervals of wear.
25. The method of claim 23 wherein the coefficient of wear is
reduced by using a second tubing means having a relatively large
diameter adjacent the intervals of wear.
26. The method of claim 2 wherein the burst strength of the
remaining first tubing means is determined.
27. The method of claim 23 wherein the coefficient of wear is
reduced by increasing the lubricity of the drilling fluid.
28. The method of claim 3 wherein the coefficient-of-wear is
adjusted by obtaining physical data relating to the wear of the
casing string.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to the installation and wear of well casings;
and more particularly, to a method for eliminating wear failure of
the casing of a well borehole adapted to be extended into a
subterranean earth formation.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Casing wear is a serious problem in the drilling of well boreholes.
A casing-wear hole may develop in less than 25 days or may not
occur in a year. When casing wear is not quantified, casing-wear
failures, unnecessary installation of inner strings, and
unnecessary suspension of drilling can result. A blowout which
includes a shallow casing-wear hole is one of the most dangerous
situations encountered in a well.
Known prior art techniques for coping with such problems involve
running caliper surveys or installing drill pipe rubbers. The
caliper survey has the disadvantage that the survey itself causes
wear, it is not known when to run the survey, and the results are
questionable. Drill pipe rubbers have the disadvantage that it is
not known where to install them; and the results are also
questionable. In any event, the use of caliper surveys and drill
pipe rubbers have not eliminated casing-wear failures.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of this invention to provide a method for
eliminating casing-wear failure in a well borehole.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a method for
determining the force-onto-the-wall of a well borehole caused by a
tubing means extending therethrough.
It is a still further object of this invention to provide a method
of quantifying wear of the casing of a well borehole caused by
tubing means extending therethrough.
It is an even further object of this invention to provide a method
for eliminating wear failure of casings of a well borehole.
These and other objects are preferably accomplished by determining
where casing wear takes place, quantifying casing wear
continuously, designing the casing for wear by increasing the
physical properties of the casing, reducing the amount of wear, and
replacing casing worn to the tolerable limit.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
It is well known in the petroleum industry that, in the art of
drilling of a well borehole into a subterranean earth formation in
search or production of minerals and/or energy, certain casing
strings are needed. In offshore wells, caissons (drive pipe) are
required; and in both offshore and onshore wells, conductor casing,
surface casing, protective casing, protective casing liner strings
and protective casing inner strings may be, or are, required under
certain geological conditions as, for example, shown in U.S. Pat.
No. 3,399,723. In all the aforementioned casing strings, by
definition, formations are drilled below the casing. A casing
string is sectionalized and is made up of interconnected sections,
commonly referred to as joints, and the joints are generally in the
range of either about 30 feet or 40 feet long. The joints are made
up at upset collars or flush-joint couplings. When drilling is
concluded and the minerals and/or energy are to be produced, casing
to produce the well will be needed and such casing may be a
production casing string, production casing liner, and a production
casing inner string. Sometimes, a protective string may be used as
a production string. In a given casing string, the outside diameter
is generally constant. The grade (yield strength) is varied; and
the wall thickness (or weight) is increased by reducing the inside
diameter.
The purpose of casing and liner strings is quite rigid; and when
the string fails to serve its intended function, the results are
serious.
Techniques are well known for determining that the weights and/or
grades of one interval are varied from another interval in a casing
string to accommodate the variations in tensile load during and
after installation, and the hydrostatic head of fluids inside and
outside of the casing during drilling operations, including kick
control, and added surface pressures during producing operations. A
casing string to meet these requirements may be designed at minimal
cost.
It is also well known that during drilling and completion
operations, tubing means, such as tubing strings and wirelines, are
run into the well borehole and through the casing strings. During
drilling, the tubing means generally consists of a rock bit, drill
collars, and drill pipe connected to a kelly joint; and this string
is commonly referred to as the drill stem. The drill pipe is also
sectionalized and the length of each section, or joint, is about 30
feet. The coupling may be flush joint but is usually upset and
called a tool joint. Rotation of the rock bit is required to drill,
and this is generally accomplished by rotating the entire drill
stem but may also be accomplished with the use of a motor above the
bit. Trips are required to change worn-out bits and run logs or
surveys. The surveys include electrical logs, density logs, sonic
logs, directional logs, dipmeter logs, etc., all of which require
wireline runs. During completion, cleanout trips, wireline runs,
and installation of a tubing string are required. The tubing string
usually has a constant inside diameter. All this movement involves
rubbing metal against metal and induces wear. The movement is
vigorous, and the wear is severe.
Studies have been made to determine the wear and fatigue to which
the drill stem is subjected, and as aforementioned, techniques are
well known to design a casing string with a safety factor for the
tensile and pressure forces imposed upon it.
However, it is not known how to determine where, why, when, and how
much wear occurs in a casing string; consequently, there are now no
methods to (1) design a casing string for casing wear, (2) monitor
and quantify casing wear continuously during operations, (3) reduce
the amount of wear, (4) determine when casing has been worn to the
tolerable limit, and (5) replace casing worn beyond the tolerable
limit.
When used throughout this specification, the term "tubing means"
will be used to refer to casing, liner, tubing, drill stem strings,
and the strings used to drill and produce a well borehole such as
the tubing string or wireline string.
In drilling a well, techniques are well known in the art of
directionally surveying the trajectory of the well bore.
Directional survey instruments used in practice measure the
inclination of the hole with the vertical and the direction of the
hole. The directional survey comprises a series of these
measurements at pre-determined depths, and each depth of
measurement is commonly called a station. The single-shot survey
may be run while drilling and a multi-shot survey may be run while
pulling out of the hole. Both of these surveys are made with the
instrument seated in a non-magnetic drill collar. A directional
survey may be run with an instrument attached to a wireline and
lowered in the open hole. The direction in these instruments is
obtained by a magnetic compass. A gyroscopic directional survey may
be run on a wireline with the instrument inside a casing string.
The original purpose of a directional survey was to compute the
points-in-space of a well bore; however, in more recent years, the
directional survey has been used to compute the hole curvature,
also called dogleg severity or angle changes. For example, two
stations, A and B, may be used to establish the hole direction
between them, and this direction may be extrapolated to the depth
of station C. Stations B and C will establish another direction,
and the angle change, or difference between the two directions may
be computed manually using trigonometry. Manual calculations of
dogleg severity are very tedious, repetitive, and time consuming
and therefore are seldom done. This led to the development of
nomographs, but the computations are still tedious to make. More
recently, dogleg severity calculations have been programmed for a
computer. In one example, a computer output was taken of the dogleg
severity of the surface hole, i.e., the hole to be cased with
surface casing, in example well No. A. These computations are of
the single-shot directional survey. It is common to refer to dogleg
severity in degrees per 100 feet; however, hereinafter these angle
changes will be computed in minutes per foot as a dogleg may exist
in less than 100 feet. This output showed that angle changes were
as high as 4.8 minutes per feet and as low as zero. These tests
also showed that a high angle change was concentrated over a
relatively short interval and that high angle changes were few in
number. A high angle change covering a short interval may generally
be reduced by string-reaming the dogleg. This, in effect, spreads
the dogleg over a longer interval. String-reaming is accomplished
by placing a roller bit, having the same gauge as the rockbit, at a
point above the rockbit so that the desired weight will be in
effect below the roller bit.
Casing wear is caused by the force of either the drill stem or
wireline onto the casing wall and, with everything else being
equal, is proportional to this force. This is expressed as Equation
(1).
V Worn = F .times. CW .times. D (1)
Where
V worn = Volume Worn;
F = force-onto-the-wall;
Cw = coefficient-of-wear; and
D = duration or time of wear.
In turn, the main force-onto-the-wall is equal to twice the sine of
one-half the angle change (dogleg severity) times the tension due
to effective weight of the drill stem or wireline below the angle
change. This is expressed as Equation (2).
F = 2 T Sine .theta./2 (2)
Where
F = force-onto-the-wall in pounds per foot;
T = tension of drill stem or wireline at angle change; and
.theta. = Angle change.
At very small angles, an equation of tension times either the sine
of the angle change or the tangent of the angle change would
approximate the answer; but the error increases as the angle change
increases. The effective tension is the weight of the drill stem,
or wireline, (in air) below the angle change calculated for the
vertical component less the buoyancy factor of the fluid in the
borehole. Tension is expressed as Equation (3) and buoyancy factor
as Equation (4).
T = (Wt.sub.1 .times. VL.sub.1 + Wt.sub.2 .times. VL.sub.2 +
Wt.sub.3 .times. VL.sub.3, etc.)BF (3)
Where
T = Tension in pounds;
Wt.sub.1,.sub.2,.sub.3 = Weight per foot of each interval of drill
stem in pounds;
VL.sub.1,.sub.2,.sub.3 = Vertical length of each interval of drill
stem in feet; and
BF = Buoyancy Factor.
Where
Bf = buoyancy Factor;
Dens = density of metal of drill stem-grams/cc;
0.12 = Converts pounds per gallon to grams/cc; and Fluid weight is
in pounds per gallon (ppg).
Tension is maximum at the surface and decreases to zero at bottom.
Tension may be calculated at any projected depth either before the
open hole is drilled or any depth during drilling operations.
Therefore, with the tension and angle change known, the
force-onto-the-wall may be calculated either before, when, or after
the hole is drilled for a known angle change. Tension and
force-onto-the-wall may be done manually, but again it is very
tedious. A computer calculation was made of the tension and
force-onto-the-wall at the doglegs of the surface hole of example
well No. A with the proposed drill stem suspended to the projected
total depth. The effective tension was found to be 154,480.1 pounds
at the surface and 100,604.6 pounds at 4,064 feet. Also, the
force-onto-the-wall was found to vary from 202.9 pounds per foot to
zero. Five doglegs with forces-onto-the-wall of over 100 pounds per
foot were found.
Casing wear will be concentrated in relatively few, isolated
positions; these positions of casing wear exist where high angle
changes and high tension coincide.
There is a component due to the unit weight of the drill stem that
alters the tensional force-onto-the wall. For example, in a hole
slanted at 14 degrees from the vertical, a drill pipe having an
effective weight of 16.6 pounds per foot would yield a force normal
to a foot of casing of 4 pounds per foot. This would be added in
angle drop-off and subtracted in angle build-up. Thus, it is seen
that the force component due to the unit weight of the string may
be taken into consideration but alters the tensional
force-onto-the-wall only to a minor extent.
Significantly, the technique of force-onto-the-wall may be used to
calculate the force-onto-the-wall of the borehole by the casing
string itself. Thus, the technique of this invention may be used to
properly centralize casing and prevent differentially stuck casing
while running and cementing this string.
A directional well, by the fact it is deflected out to reach its
target objective, must contain angle changes. The tendency is to
make these deflections at shallow depths because the formations are
softer and because, for a given slant, a greater horizontal
distance may be obtained. As aforementioned, casing wear is greater
at shallow depths for a given angle change. A vertical well is
intended to be drilled straight and therefore, theoretically, there
would be no angle changes or casing wear. However, as there is no
such thing as a perfectly straight hole, angle changes exist in
vertical holes to some degree. Generally, dogleg severity is
greater in directional wells than vertical wells. Therefore, slant
well boreholes with shallow angle changes are generally more
susceptible to casing wear.
During drilling operations, the drill stem or wireline seeks a
position on the casing wall due to the force-onto-the-wall and
wears a groove. Viewing the longitudinal contact of the drill pipe
on the casing, in 41/2 inch extra-hole drill pipe having 6-inch OD
tool joints, the radius of the tool joints would be three-fourths
inch greater than the drill pipe. The sine (and tangent) of 15
minutes (one minute per foot) over a 15-foot distance (mid-point of
a joint of drill pipe) amounts to about three-fourths inch.
Therefore, the drill pipe comes to rest against the wall of casing
with hole curvature in excess of 1 minute per foot. Thus, below
that figure, all the wear may be attributable to the tool joints,
while above one minute per foot, both would be expected to cause
casing wear. As angle changes increase, wear due to the body of
drill pipe increases. At high angle changes, most of the wear is
due to the body of the drill pipe; and as aforementioned, generally
casing wear is a problem where high angle changes exist and at
shallow depths.
The volume of a groove in cubic inches per foot may be divided by
12 to obtain the cross-sectional area in square inches. The
cross-sectional area of the casing-wear groove is crescent shaped.
The drill stem crescent is formed by an arc of the inside circle of
the casing and an arc of the outside circle of the drill stem.
After the drill stem crescent is formed, a wireline crescent will
be formed by the drill stem arc and an arc of the outside circle of
the wireline. In new casing, the wireline crescent will be formed
by the casing and wireline arcs. Each chord of each arc of a
crescent are common to each other. When the chord of the wireline
arc is equal to the diameter of the wireline, additional wireline
wear will be plug-shaped. The area of all these crescents (and
plugs) may be approximated by drafting them on grid paper and
either (1) counting squares or (2) planimetering. This procedure is
repetitive, tedious, and time consuming. Nomographs may be
constructed for the crescent, but their use would still be
tedious.
The area and dimensions of a crescent may be expressed in the
following Equation (5): ##SPC1##
Where:
A = cross-sectional area of the crescent;
r.sub.1 = Outside radius of either the drill stem or wireline;
r.sub.2 = Inside radius of either the casing or outside radius of
the drill stem; and
d = Wall of casing that has been worn away, being the maximum
thickness of the crescent.
Equation (6) is another equation that expresses the area and
dimensions of a crescent: ##SPC2##
Where:
A = cross-sectional area of the crescent;
r.sub.d = Outside radius of either the drill stem or wireline;
r.sub.c = Inside radius of either the casing or outside radius of
the drill stem;
x.sub.d = Distance between centers of the two circles (the circles
of r.sub.d and r.sub.c);
x.sub.i = Distance between the chord (where it intersects the
abscissa) and the center of the casing ID circle; and
x.sub.d +r.sub.d -r.sub.c = Wall of casing that has been worn
away.
Calculations using either Equation (5) or Equation (6) are
difficult to do manually. They may, however, be solved easily by a
computer using the iteration method. When the radii are known,
given the area "A", the wall worn away "d" (Equation 5) may be
computed; and, vice versa, given "d", the area "A" may be computed.
The area of the plug worn by the wireline after the chord of the
crescent becomes equal to the diameter of the wireline may be
expressed by the following Equation (7):
ARPLG = DIAWL .times. PWLP
(7)
Where:
ARPLG = Area of the plug;
DIAWL = Diameter of the wireline; and
PWLP = Wall worn away by the wireline plug, or penetration of the
plug.
EXAMPLE
It has been found that a 5-inch drill stem requires the wearing of
12.25 cubic inches per foot of casing before wearing-a-hole in 9
5/8-inch, 0.395-inch wall, casing. The amount of wear on a casing
wall which would develop a hole therein is that volume of wall
thickness which permits the drill stem to become tangent to the
outside diameter of the casing or, in other words, when the casing
wall worn away equals the wall thickness. It has been further found
that, by increasing the wall thickness to 0.545 inches, the wearing
of 19.5 cubic inches per foot of casing is required to wear a hole
in the casing. This represents 59.2 percent more metal; and, all
other parameters being equal, 59.2 percent more drilling time
before failure occurs.
The coefficient-of-wear per unit of force may be obtained from a
similar well borehole in which a casing hole has been worn. The
wear factor may also be determined in a well borehole where a
groove has been worn, the casing has been recovered, and a
dimension of the crescent is measured. Laboratory tests may also be
used to determine the coefficient-of-wear for field conditions.
Thus, the coefficient-of-wear may be determined for either the
drill stem or the wireline.
As discussed above wherein a computer calculation was made of the
tension and force-onto-the-wall at the doglegs of the surface hole
of example well No. A, any number of high forces-onto the-wall may
be selected by visual examination or by a computer. For example, a
computer output of the five greatest forces-onto-the-wall and their
interval may be taken. The initially designed casing string for
tensile and pressure requirements will be known; and the joints of
tensile-pressure designed casing string opposite the doglegs will
also be known. Casing size is 13 3/8-inch in example well No. A.
Using the aforementioned equations, the duration to failure may be
determined either manually or by the computer. A computer output of
the time-to-failure of the determined five greatest
forces-onto-the-wall of example well No. A was found to vary from
27.7 to 44.9 days. It is recalled that the force-onto-the-wall in
example well No. A is that for the drill stem suspended at the
projected total depth. The actual drilling time will be higher as
the weighted average force-onto-the-wall to drill the well will be
less than that at total depth, but will be in relative
proportion.
It was also found that the weakest interval was from 619 to 654
feet wherein the days-to-failure was 27.7. It was also noted that
the casing weight opposite this interval was 54.5 pounds per foot
and the wall thickness of 0.380 inch. Casing with a weight of 61.0
pounds per foot with a wall of 0.430 inch is in the casing string
and may be placed in the interval 619 to 654 feet. Heavier casing
with thicker wall is also available. Therefore, the casing string
may be optimized with respect to weights. This may be done either
manually or by the computer. In another example, the string was
optimized by use of four weights. The time-to-failure was found to
have increased from 27.7 to 42.9 days. This was accomplished by
substituting heavier casing in four of the dogleg. Only five joints
of casing were affected. The fifth dogleg, 3086 to 3120, was not
affected by weight optimization.
There is a practical limit to increasing the wall thickness, i.e.
weights, of casing, which reduces the inside diameter. Most
factory-made weights are within a range to run a particular size
rock bit (outside diameter). Further increase in weight would
require drilling with a smaller rockbit, in which event, a smaller
borehole would be drilled.
The tolerable limit of casing wear will be dictated by burst
strength to contain pressures, primarily for kick control during
drilling operations or surface pressures during producing
operations. For example, a surface casing string may be intended to
hold a back pressure of 2,000 psi to bring an expected kick under
control, or a protective casing may be intended to hold 2,500 psi
surface pressure during producing operations. In a hydropressure
well, the surface casing string may be intended to hold only the
pressure required to circulate the drilling fluid. Prudent
operations would include a safety factor in such designs. The
safety factor should be greater than tolerance of error of the
coefficient of wear. When the casing reaches this state, it is
spoken of as having reached its tolerable limit or as no longer
safe for drilling.
Burst strength can be expressed by the following Equation (8):
Where:
K = Coefficient;
PI = Remaining burst strength -- psi;
MYLST = Minimum yield strength - psi, or grade;
REWALL = Remaining wall - inches; and
CASEOD = Outside diameter of casing.
The following table shows some grades used in the petroleum
industry as follows:
TABLE A
Minimum Ultimate Minimum Hardness Yield Yield Brinell Rockwell
Grade Strength(psi) Strength(psi) (bhn) Rc
__________________________________________________________________________
(Casing) H-40 40,000 60,000 120 -- J-55 55,000 95,000 190 13.5 C-75
95,000 190 13.5 N-80 80,000 100,000 205 16 P-110 110,000 125,000
255 25 V-150 160,000 321 34 (Drill Pipe) D 55,000 95,000 190 13.5 E
75,000 100,000 205 16 G 105,000 120,000 245 24.0 S 135,000 150,000
302 32 X-95 95,000 110,000 229 20.5
__________________________________________________________________________
in a given casing size where the tolerable limit is a fixed burst
strength, it is seen that the required remaining wall may be
reduced by increasing the minimum yield strength. This means more
volume of casing may be worn before the tolerable limit is
reached.
In addition, Table A shows that Brinell hardness correlates with
ultimate strength. Ultimate strength correlates with minimum yield
strength, or grade. Therefore, by increasing grade, Brinell
hardness is increased and the coefficient-of-wear is decreased.
Optimization of a casing string by grade may be done manually, but,
again, it is quite tedious. In another example, the casing string
of example well No. A was optimized by both four weights and two
grades. The second grade had a coefficient-of-wear that was 30
percent less than the first grade. There was found to be 27
different combinations of a stronger casing string. Also, the use
of four weights and two grades was found to have increased the
time-to-failure from 27.7 to 61.3 days, or 121.3 percent.
A casing string is no stronger than its weakest interval. After
progressively upgrading each interval, but only to extent that it
does not remain the weakest interval, it was found that eventually
a state was reached wherein one interval can no longer be
upgraded.
As aforementioned, the foregoing example computations are those for
the single-shot directional survey.
A directional well may be either a "L" type or "S" type. The "L"
type is accomplished by deflecting the well bore to the desired
slant and maintaining the slant to total depth. The "S" type is
accomplished by deflecting the well bore to a desired slant,
maintaining the slant until the desired horizontal distance is
reached, and then the well bore is permitted to return to vertical.
Thus, both types contain the first bend, and the "S" type contains
a second bend. The top of the first bend is commonly called the
kick off point (KOP). The first bend may be accomplished by either
(1) a down-hole motor with a bent sub, (2) a jet bit, or (3) a
whipstock. The angle changes may generally be kept to lower values
with the down-hole motor assembly, followed by the jet bit, and are
generally higher with the whipstock. On the other hand, the
formations may be such that the desired deflection cannot be
obtained by the down-hole motor assembly, followed by the jet bit,
and the whipstock is then required. Thus, steps can sometimes be
taken to keep angle changes to lower values in in the first
bend.
Some up-the-hole doglegs will be partially wiped out automatically
during drilling. As aforementioned, other doglegs may be reduced by
string-reaming the interval which, in effect, spreads the angle
change over a longer interval. It is common practice to place the
KOP just below a casing shoe. This precludes spreading the angle
changes of this bend. Therefore, it is part of this invention that
the KOP be placed a sufficient distance below the last casing shoe
so that formations will exist above as well as below the KOP to
permit string reaming. Therefore, before casing is installed, angle
changes may be (1) kept to relative low values and (2) may be
reduced. Equations (1) and (2) show that the reduction of the angle
changes reduces the force-onto-wall. This, in turn, reduces the
amount of wear, which increases the allowed drilling time. As
aforementioned, a multi-shot, wireline, or gyroscopic directional
survey may be run before the casing is installed, and, where high
dogleg severity and high forces-onto-the-wall exist, the
directional survey may be run at 30-foot stations, when necessary,
to obtain the accurate dogleg severity conditions in the well
borehole. Again, dogleg severity, force-onto-the-wall,
days-to-failure of the originally designed casing string, and the
optimized casing string by weights and grades, all may be
determined.
The positions where wear will be concentrated is generally in that
part of the string where the thinnest wall and lowest grade are
required for pressure-tensile requirements. A string of thick wall
and high grade throughout increases the cost of the string quite
substantially and would require an addition to the tensile
requirements. The extra cost to optimize a casing string is
nominal.
Tension of the drill stem may also be decreased by decreasing the
weight of the drill stem. Equations (1) and (2) show that the
reduction of tension reduces the amount of wear. The weight of the
drill stem may be reduced by tapering the drill pipe. For example,
4 1/2-inch, 16.6 pound per foot, may be used in the upper part of
the string and 3 1/2-inch, 13.3 pound per foot in the lower part of
the string. Another way to reduce tension is to substitute a drill
stem composed of a metal lighter than steel. For example, aluminum
drill pipe may be used. The body of the drill pipe is
aluminum-alloy whereas the tool joints are steel. Some of the
aluminum physical difference with steel, and some aluminum drill
pipe physical dimensions and properties, are tabulated in Table
B.
TABLE B
Aluminum-Alloy Steel
__________________________________________________________________________
4 1/2-in. drill pipe 4 1/2-in. drill pipe with w/tool joints tool
joints ID 3.826-in. 16.6-/ft. ID 3.754-in. 18.1-/ft. ID 3.6-in.
10.75-/ft. ID 3.640-in. 20.0-/ft. Density of Aluminum Density of
steel -- 7.85 alloy -- 2.8
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aluminum Drill Pipe Physical Dimensions and Properties
Body Nominal Tapered OD TJ -/Ft effective OD Max Min ID OD DP w/TJ
density 4 1/2-in. 5.031 4.6 3.6 IF 6 1/8 10.75 3.245 4-in 4.625 4.2
3.280 IF 5 3/4 9.68 3.324 3 1/2-in. 3.875 3.7 2.675 IF 4 3/4 7.87
3.205 2 7/8-in. 3.35 3.35 2.15 IF 4 1/8 7.36 3.156
__________________________________________________________________________
from Table B, it is seen that 4 1/2-in. OD, 3.6-in. ID
aluminum-alloy drill pipe weighs 10.75 pounds per foot whereas 4
1/2-in. OD, 3.64-in. ID, steel drill pipe weights 20.0 pounds per
foot. In addition, it will be noted the effective density of
aluminum drill pipe ranges from 3.156 to 3.324 grams per cubic
centimeter as compared to 7.85 for steel. Therefore, as shown in
Equation (3) and Equation (4), a decrease in density decreases the
buoyancy factor which decreases the tension. For example, a 4
1/2-in. OD string of steel drill pipe weighing 100,000 pounds in
air will weigh 75,541 pounds in a 16-ppg mud; whereas, a 4 1/2-in.
OD string of aluminum drill pipe also weighing 100,000 pounds in
air will weigh 40,832 pounds in 16-ppg mud. Thus, drilling time
before the tolerable limit is reached may almost be doubled by
using aluminum drill pipe instead of steel drill pipe.
Drilling time may also be increased by using a larger drill pipe
down through the weakest dogleg. As discussed above, an increase in
the drill pipe diameter increases the volume of casing required to
wear a hole in the casing.
In addition, aluminum and steel are dissimilar metals and when
rubbed against each other, they provide a "bearing" surface. This
same "bearing" effect is accomplished by either (1) galvanizing
(hot dip) or (2) electroplating either the inside wall of the
casing string or outside wall of the drill pipe.
As discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,399,723, a fluid medium is needed
to drill. This fluid may be gas, either air or hydrocarbon gas, in
"hard-rock" country, or a liquid in both "hard-rock" and
"soft-rock" country. Lubricants may be added to the drilling fluid
medium which in turn reduces the coefficient-of-wear of the drill
stem and casing. These lubricants include graphite, asphalt, crude
oil, refined oil, walnut shells, etc. The lubricity is increased
substantially when water-base muds are replaced with oil-base
muds.
Some materials in the drilling fluid increase the
coefficient-of-wear. Those that are harmful and are normally added
to the drilling fluid may be either left out or replaced by
additives that are not harmful.
Some materials that increase wear are picked up during drilling.
Sand, for example silica sand, when added to the drilling fluid
increases wear substantially. In a mud, the sand may be
recirculated; but this problem is reduced when steps are taken to
de-sand the mud.
Corrosive materials may be added or picked up while drilling, but
steps may be taken to neutralize such corrosion. For example,
carbon dioxide may exist in the pore fluids of the formations and
enter into the drilling fluid. The carbon dioxide combines with
water to form carbonic acid which is corrosive and increases wear.
Additions may be made to neutralize this acid into harmless
residues.
All the aforementioned tests may be taken in accordance with my
invention before drilling is undertaken below the casing and/or
liner.
While drilling is undertaken below a casing and/or liner string,
the casing wall opposite one or a selected number of doglegs may be
monitored continuously or periodically for casing wear. For
example, the volume of wear may be accumulated; and the wall worn
away, remaining wall, and remaining burst strength may be
calculated each day. The calculations may be broken down for either
wireline and drill stem operations. For example, the cumulative
volume of wear and cumulative wall worn away for drill stem
operations may be obtained. The wear for a subsequent wireline
operation may be calculated, and the wall worn away may also be
computed. Thus, the remaining wall of the wireline groove inside
the drill stem groove may be obtained, and the burst strength
computed.
The volume of the wireline groove must be taken into consideration
when drill stem operations are resumed. Until the wireline groove
is "wiped out" by the drill stem, the remaining wall will be due to
the wireline groove and remains the same. After the drill stem
groove wipes out the wireline groove, additional wear by the drill
stem will determine the remaining wall. Most formation-evaluation
logs, e.g. the electrical survey, must be run in open hole;
however, it would be possible to defer all wireline surveys until
the open hole has been drilled and just before it is to be cased
(or abandoned). In this event, only the drill stem groove would be
involved in casing wear.
When the tolerable limit of the casing and/or liner is reached,
drilling and/or wireline operations may be suspended; but steps may
be undertaken, as hereinafter described, to permit additional
operations.
In all probabilities, the first tolerable limit of casing wear will
be reached at a relative shallow interval in either surface casing
or protective casing, but the following steps are not restricted to
these two casing strings.
If no additional drilling is permissible with surface casing, a
protective casing string may then be installed. This installation
automatically leads us to the following:
When the tolerable limit of wear of the protective casing is
reached, an inner casing string may be installed. It is understood
that all casing and/or liner strings are to be optimized as was
discussed hereinabove. It is recalled that the amount of wear that
will occur may be computed before the casing and/or liners are
installed and the number of days to failure may be calculated for
an estimated weighted average tension. The number of days required
to drill to the target objective may also be estimated. Therefore,
it may be ascertained whether or not any casing string and/or liner
will be adequate for the required operations.
It is common practice to cement surface casing, protective casing,
and protective liners in well boreholes. Liners are generally
cemented throughout. The surface and protective casing may
sometimes be recovered by backing it off or cutting it in two in
the borehole; but generally such a recovery may only be
accomplished by that amount of protective casing inside the surface
casing and that amount of surface casing inside the conductor
string. However, such steps may not be possible except when the
well is abandoned.
It is common practice to cement inner strings. It is recalled that
an inner string is, by definition, a casing string installed inside
another casing string. It is a part of this invention that inner
casing strings be installed in order that they may be recovered
when desired. Thus, when an inner casing string reaches the
tolerable limit, it may be replaced with a new inner casing string.
This may be repeated indefinitely. Therefore, casing-wear may be
eliminated as a limitation in drilling operations.
The bottom of the inner string requires a rigid seat such that a
joint or joints will not back-off during drilling. This may be
accomplished by a recoverable packer. The bottom of the inner
string may also be attached by a permanent packer or may be
cemented. In this event, a back-off coupling is provided above the
packer or cemented zone. Centralization may be provided above and
below the coupling to facilitate backing-off the old inner string
and stabbing the new inner string.
The tolerable limit of casing wear may be reached by either the
drill stem groove and/or wireline groove, and additional wireline
operations are desired. In this event, either an open-ended drill
pipe string, open-ended casing string, or open-ended tubing string
may be run through worn spots of the casing string, and the
wireline operations continued without limitation. The wireline wear
then occurs in the open string and the casing string is protected.
The open-ended string may be re-oriented a few degrees of a circle
periodically and wireline wear will not be concentrated in one
groove in the string.
The drill pipe opposite the angle changes may be equipped with
stabilizers. The stabilizer designed for casing wear would be one
which the inside is stationary against the drill pipe and outside
is stationary against the casing, with the rotation occurring
inside the stabilizer. The stabilizer may be a prepack lubricated,
sealed, roller-bearing. The stabilizer may also be designed with a
lubricated bearing of two dissimilar metals, such as the main
bearing of an automobile engine. With such a "bearing" stabilizer,
there is neither rubbing of drill stem against the casing nor
rubbing of stabilizer against drill stem, nor rubbing of stabilizer
against the casing, as all movement will occur in the bearing of
the stabilizer.
In accordance with my invention, the aforementioned stabilizers
should be placed opposite the intervals where casing wear will be
concentrated as discussed above. Further, two stabilizers are
placed on each joint, one at the tool joint and one at the middle
of the joint of drill pipe, opposite the intervals of critical
wear. Corrugation of the stabilizer improves its efficiency.
As discussed before, casing wear is broken down into that caused by
the drill stem and that caused by wireline operations. The
components of drill stem operations may also be subdivided. For
example, drill stem operations may be broken down into the time of:
rotation for drilling, rotation to condition mud, trips, fishing,
and no drill stem operation. The drill stem operations of wells in
a geological environment with a drilling routine are similar with
one another. Therefore, using day's operations normalizes these
components, and the wear calculated for one well will agree closely
with another well.
If the drilling routine is different, the operations may be broken
into the additional components. The rotary speed (revolutions per
minute) may be taken into account during drilling, and time can be
accumulated in rpm-hours-force. The drill collar weight is designed
for weight-on-bit, and the weight-on-bit may be deducted from the
drill stem weight while drilling. When mud is conditioned, the
rotary speed is reduced, but the full weight of the drill collars
are added to the drill pipe string. During a trip, the weight of
the drill pipe string includes the drill collars when starting out
of the hole and reaches zero at the surface, and this weight is
reversed when the drill stem is run into the hole. Trip movement is
longitudinal as compared to rotation for drilling. Wear is
different when fishing: working the drill stem involves adding to
and slacking off the full weight of the drill stem. Again, these
component calculations may be done manually but preferably are
carried out by a computer.
It is recognized that there are many factors to well casing wear.
For example, the hard-facing of tool joints may be expected to
increase the coefficient-of-wear of casing. Here, the objective is
the protection of the drill stem, and more particularly, the tool
joints.
Drill pipe rubbers have been installed on the drill pipe of the
drill stem. The results of such installation are questionable.
Installation is made at the tool joints on each joint, every other
joint, every third joint (threble, or stand) through all or most of
the casing string. Thus, drill pipe rubbers are used primarily for
the protection of the tool joints. As aforementioned, casing wear
at high angle changes is caused by the body of the drill pipe.
Former drill pipe rubbers were susceptible to impregnation by gas,
and very large swelling sometimes resulted when the rubber was
pulled out of the hole. In fact, recovery of the drill stem to
eliminate swelled drill pipe rubbers was a difficult operation.
While rubbers are now available that are impervious to gas
swelling, there is the possibility that sand becomes impregnated in
the rubber causing more wear than the drill pipe body. There has
always been the problem of drill pipe rubbers being torn loose. In
any event, the use of drill pipe rubbers has not solved the problem
of casing-wear failures.
If drill pipe rubbers are found to reduce the wear of the casing by
the drill stem, placement of the rubbers would be similar to the
placement of the aforementioned stabilizers at the center and end
of each joint opposite the intervals where wear will be
concentrated.
SUMMARY OF METHODS FOR ELIMINATING CASING-WEAR FAILURES
I. Intervals along the well borehole where wear will be
concentrated are first determined and reduced, as discussed
hereinabove and summarized below:
1. The angle changes in a well borehole may be held within
acceptable limits while drilling the well borehole. A slant well
borehole may be deflected out to the desired horizontal distance
with angle changes still held within acceptable limits, with
preference given to a down-hole motor assembly, then a jet bit, and
finally a whipstock to deflect the borehole. The kick off point
(KOP) may be selected so that formations exist above and below. A
directional survey of the well borehole may be made while drilling
to determine the magnitude and depth interval in the well borehole
of angle changes (dogleg severity).
2. The force-onto-the-wall by the drill stem may be computed for
each dogleg using the tension of the drill stem projected to either
(a) the target objective, (b) its estimated weighted average to
reach the target objective, or (c) any depth above the target
objective. The force-onto-the-wall may be calculated by a
mathematical equation.
3. The wall of the well borehole may be string-reamed at high angle
changes, if necessary, to reduce them by distributing them over a
longer distance. This may include the first bend as formations will
exist above and below.
4. Portions of the hole, if necessary, may be directionally
surveyed again and dogleg severity calculated again. The high
doglegs, particularly those causing the high forces-onto-the-wall
or those over a long interval, may be resurveyed at 30-foot
stations.
5. Steps I.3 and/or I.4 may be repeated until the reduction of
angle changes is optimum and the high angle changes are accurately
determined within 30-foot stations.
6. Step I.2 may be repeated. Intervals where force-onto-the-wall of
the drill stem is abnormally high and casing wear will be
concentrated may be determined.
7. The following mathematical equation may be used to calculate to
force of drill stem onto-the-wall for Step I.2, hereinabove. Force
equals the product of twice times the sine of one-half the angle
change times the tension at the angle change.
8. The days to failure can be determined for the tensile-pressure
designed casing string.
a. The mathematical formula for a crescent is used in calculating
days-to-failure.
II. The tensile-pressure designed casing or liner string may be
also designed for casing wear by strengthening those intervals
where wear will be concentrated. This may be accomplished by:
1. Installing thicker-walled casing in those intervals where wear
will be concentrated as determined in Step I.6.
2. installing higher grade casing in those intervals where wear
will be concentrated as determined in Step I.6. Grade reduces the
coefficient-of-wear and permits more steel to be worn before the
tolerable limit is reached.
3. Optimizing the casing string for wear with the weights and
grades available in the string at the rig site.
4. Optimizing the casing string for wear with the weights and
grades available from the steel-mill factory.
5. Calculating the projected time that casing will be worn to where
it is no longer safe (tolerable limit is reached).
6. Monitoring continuously casing wear so that the remaining wall
and burst strength will be known at all times.
a. The remaining wall may be calculated with mathematical formula
of the crescent. The burst strength may also be calculated with a
mathematical formula.
7. Suspending drilling before the casing fails.
8. Installing an inner string if additional drilling is needed to
reach the target objective, designed for casing wear in the same
manner as the casing and liner string.
9. Installing an inner string if needed to hold high surface
pressures to produce minerals and/or energy.
III. The rate of wear of the casing string may be reduced in the
following manner:
1. A tapered drill stem may be installed that reduces tension and
force-onto-the-wall, which in turn reduces the amount of wear.
2. A drill stem may be installed which is composed of a metal with
less density than steel and which reduces tension and
force-onto-the-wall. The reduction of the force-onto-the-wall
reduces the amount of wear.
3. A drill stem with a larger-diameter drill pipe body may be
installed opposite the intervals where wear will be concentrated.
The larger-diameter drill pipe body will require wearing of more
volume of casing steel before the tolerable limit is reached.
4. The lubricity of the drilling fluid may be increased.
5. The abrasiveness of the drilling fluid may be decreased by
removal of deleterious solids.
6. The corrosiveness of the drilling fluid may be decreased.
7. Stabilizers may be installed on the drill stem opposite those
intervals where casing wear will be concentrated.
a. Two stabilizers may be installed on each joint, one at the tool
joint and one mid-way between tool joints, opposite the intervals
where wear will be concentrated.
b. The inside of the stabilizers may be fixed to the drill stem and
outside remain stationary on the casing wall with the rotation
occurring in a "bearing" within the stabilizer.
c. The bearing may be pre-packed and lubricated.
d. The bearing may be a roller-bearing.
e. The stabilizer may be corrugated.
f. The stabilizer may be an improved adaptation of the drill pipe
rubber.
8. Either the inside of the casing or the outside of the drill stem
may be either galvanized or electroplated.
IV. Retrievable inner tubular strings (either inner drill pipe,
inner tubing, or inner casing strings) may be installed:
1. A retrievable inner casing string may be installed with the
bottom at least below the critical intervals found in either Step
I.2 or Step I.6 and down to the liner casing top. The bottom of
inner casing may be affixed rigidly to the outer casing string such
that drilling can be conducted. The bottom attachment may be
accomplished by a retrievable packer which will permit recovery.
The bottom may also be attached by either a permanent packer or by
cementation, and a special coupling may be provided at a
predetermined depth but at least below the critical intervals. The
inner string will be retrievable and replaceable to the coupling.
Centralization of the coupling will facilitate stabbing the
replacement string.
The retrievable casing string may be replaced before casing is
unsafe as determined in II.6, or if needed for high
surface-pressured well boreholes. Replacement can be repeated over
and over again, as required.
2. A retrievable inner tubular string may be run past the critical
intervals when surveys are run on wirelines. Wireline wear then
occurs on the inner tubular string and not on the casing
string.
a. The inner string may be used for wireline work when the casing
is no longer safe for drilling as determined in Step II.6,
hereinabove.
b. The orientation of the inner string may be changed so that the
positions of grooves of wear within the inside circumference are
changed as desired.
V. The coefficient-of-wear used in Step I.8 and Step II.6 may be
adjusted for greater accuracy by acquiring a dimension of the
crescent as follows:
1. A hole may have been worn in the casing in a well not drilled
with these techniques. The wall worn away then equals the wall
thickness.
2. Casing is recovered and a dimension of the groove is
measured.
3. An improved caliper survey is run and provides a dimension of
the crescent.
4. A down-hole televiewer is run and provides a dimension of the
crescent.
* * * * *