U.S. patent number 3,672,465 [Application Number 05/081,051] was granted by the patent office on 1972-06-27 for gas exhaust silencer.
Invention is credited to Leland Francis Blatt, Frank H. Wiesenhofer.
United States Patent |
3,672,465 |
Blatt , et al. |
June 27, 1972 |
GAS EXHAUST SILENCER
Abstract
An air exhaust silencer comprises a housing having an air inlet
and an air outlet defined by baffle members made of a porous
material; a sound absorbing material is disposed in the housing
between the baffle members; the air enters through the inlet port
and is broken up by the porous inlet baffle for distribution
through the sound absorbing material and exhaust through the porous
outlet baffle at which the air flow is further broken up to thereby
considerably reduce the noise level of the exhausted air passing
through the silencer.
Inventors: |
Blatt; Leland Francis (Fraser,
MI), Wiesenhofer; Frank H. (Fraser, MI) |
Family
ID: |
22161808 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/081,051 |
Filed: |
October 15, 1970 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
181/258 |
Current CPC
Class: |
F01N
13/16 (20130101); F01N 1/082 (20130101); F04B
39/0083 (20130101); F01N 1/10 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
F01N
1/10 (20060101); F01N 1/08 (20060101); F01N
7/16 (20060101); F01N 7/00 (20060101); F04B
39/00 (20060101); F01n 001/10 (); F01n
007/16 () |
Field of
Search: |
;181/42,47,47.1,50,56,57,60,71,63,68-70 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,414 |
|
1913 |
|
GB |
|
808,806 |
|
Feb 1959 |
|
GB |
|
251,210 |
|
Apr 1926 |
|
GB |
|
1,120,954 |
|
Apr 1956 |
|
FR |
|
Primary Examiner: Ward, Jr.; Robert S.
Claims
We claim:
1. A silencer comprising a housing having a chamber; a sound
absorbing material disposed within said chamber; one end of said
housing being connected to a source of exhausted air; a first
baffle member disposed within said housing adjacent said one end; a
second baffle member disposed within said housing adjacent the
other end thereof; said first and said second baffle members being
permeable to permit penetration of said exhausted air through said
first baffle member into said chamber and through said sound
abosrbing material for exit through said second baffle member to
the atmosphere; said first baffle member being adapted to reduce
the noise level of said exhausted air to a first value lower than
the initial entering value; said sound absorbing material within
said chamber being adapted to further reduce the noise level of
said exhausted air to a second value lower than said first value;
and said second baffle member being adapted to still further reduce
the noise level of said exhausted air to a third value lower than
said first and second value;
said first baffle member being formed in the shape of a truncated
cylindrical cone providing an internal gas expansion chamber
aligned with said inlet and said second baffle member being formed
in the shape of a plate disposed across said other end of said
housing.
2. The silencer as defined in claim 1, said first and second baffle
members being made from sintered bronze.
3. The silencer as defined claim 1, in which said second baffle
member comprises a perforated plate.
4. The silencer as defined in claim 1, wherein the apex of the cone
is remote from the inlet to the chamber.
5. The silencer as defined in claim 1, wherein the first baffle
member is of sintered bronze.
6. The silencer as defined in claim 5, wherein the second baffle
member is a perforated plate.
7. The silencer as defined in claim 4, wherein the first baffle
member is of sintered bronze.
Description
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to sound absorbing devices and more
in particular to a noise subduing device to maintain a specific
noise level within acceptable limits.
Almost universally, every thing, substance or matter moving
provides or produces noise at varying frequencies and at different
noise levels which may range from a low frequency whisper to high
frequency squeals.
Any consistent sound at whatever noise level is, in most cases,
annoying to the human ear, although the sound level may not be as
high as to produce a health hazard. However, in connection with
machinery, whether it be mechanical, electrical or fluid power
operated or by combustion, noises are produced which, in instances,
exceed a safe level, particularly at high frequencies.
It is known in the industry that the federal government established
industrial safety standards by the provision of the Walsh-Healey
Act which was amended on May 8, 1969, in regard to occupational
noise exposure, setting a standard providing that a person may not
work more than 8 hours at a maximum 90 dBA (90 decibels measured on
the A-scale of a sound level meter).
Many noises produced in a plant or similar working place, are
considerably on a higher scale than 90 dBA . Most of these noises
are not merely pure tones, but in most cases are a combination of
sounds and may range from a low frequency roar to a high frequency
squeal. Obviously, combined frequencies require differentiating of
materials inside the device to stop or absorb those frequencies or
separate those frequencies in order that they not be added or
combined with one another to produce a sound level unacceptable or
unhealthful to human beings. Another factor to be considered is the
power level of the sound field. Thus, if a great deal of noise is
being produced at different frequencies, or the level of power is
high, it would require extremely large and complicated silencers to
reduce the noise to within a tolerance acceptable to a human being
at a certain distance from the origin of the sound.
As mentioned before, sound is produced by matters or substances
flowing or moving through the air or through another substance and
the noise level of the sound is dependent on the pressure and speed
of movement of the moving substance and the relative resistance of
the matter or other substance through which the moving substance
moves. Thus, air flowing through the orifice or venturi of an
exhaust valve at relatively high speed and pressure, creates a high
frequency squealing sound, whereas, for instance, the sound
produced inside of air operated tools is much more subdued, but
this sound is combined with the noise created by the working parts
of the tool. Thus, these two examples require different types of
sound absorbing material for effective silencing to within a safe
level.
Considerable difficulties are experienced in moderating or
absorbing these sounds created by the exhaust of pneumatic valves,
motors and other air operated tools in the industry. Noise is also
produced by the sound of mechanical movement of the working parts
of the tools coupled with other frequencies caused by air
vibrations as air travels through a particular valve or pneumatic
motor.
It is known to the men skilled in the art of noise reduction or
absorbtion that, when the daily noise exposure is comprised of two
or more periods of noise, the different level and combined effect
should be considered rather than the individual effect of each.
In most air tool and/or air valve applications, where a great deal
of air flow is present, requires the design of silencer chambers to
be of utmost consideration so as not to creat excessive back
pressure within the tool or valve which will cause a slow-down in
the cycle of the operation time.
Accordingly, the present invention provides an improved air exhaust
silencer construction adapted to effectively reduce high noise
levels to a safe level not exceeding 90dBA.
The present improved construction comprises a housing which has an
inlet connected to the air exhaust conduit and which is filled with
a sound absorbing material of a known substance which is retained
at both ends of the housing between baffle members made from porous
material. One of the baffle members which are axially located in
the housing defines a high noise air inlet and the other baffle
member defines a low noise exit to the atmosphere.
Thus, the exhausted air from the respective noise producinG
apparatus enters the housing through the inlet and impinges against
the first porous baffle member which acts to minutely breakup the
air stream for distribution through the intermediate sound
absOrbing material and final exit through the second porous baffle
member at a considerably reduced noise level.
The present invention will be best understood by reference to the
following detailed description with particular reference to the
attached drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The accompanying drawings illustrate a preferred embodiment of the
improved silencer structure in which:
FIG. 1 is a longitudinal cross-section through the present improved
silencer structure;
FIG. 2 is a transverse cross-section through the structure of FIG.
1 as seen along line 2--2 thereof;
FIG. 3 is a longitudinal cross-section through a modified silencer
similar to FIG. 1 constructed in accordance with the present
invention; and
FIG. 4 is a detached detail view of the alternate end baffle member
employed in the modification of FIG 3.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
With reference to the attached drawings and particularly FIGS. 1
and 2, the present improved air exhaust silencer structure
comprises a housing generally indicated at 10 which, at one end, is
attached to an exhaust pipe or conduit 12 having connection to a
noise producing device (not shown).
The silencer housing 10 may be of generally cylindrical or barrel
like structure comprising an open-ended tubular member 14 which may
be of suitable heat resistant material as generally employed in
silencer structures of this kind. One end of the cylindrical member
14 is closed by a front end cap 16 which has a threaded bore 18 for
attachment to the air exhaust pipe 12 and which defines the inlet
into the silencer.
Inwardly of the cylindrical member 14 and directly adjacent the end
cap 16 a baffle member 20 is provided composed of a radial flange
portion 22 which is clamped between the end cap 16 and a radial
shoulder 15 of the cylindrical member 14 to securely retain the
baffle member within the housing. The baffle member 20 is formed
into a frustoconical section 24 which axially inwardly extends
through the cylindrical member 14 a substantial distance, having an
inner closed end 26. The frustoconical portion 24 of the baffle
member 20 is in axial alignment with the inlet 18 to form an
expansion chamber 28. The frustoconical portion 24 is of sufficient
length to provide a sufficiently large internal surface area 30 for
impingement of the exhaust air thereon and has a sufficient chamber
area to accommodate free expansion of the exhaust air entering the
chamber 28 from inlet 18.
The baffle member 20 is made of a gas permeable material which may
be heat resistant and having a high porosity such as sintered
bronze or the like, to permit the expanded air to enter the
cylindrical chamber 17 from the expansion chamber 28 through the
porous walls of the truncated cone section 24.
The cylindrical chamber 17 of the cylindrical member 14 is filled
with a sound absorbing material 32 of any known suitable material
composition usually employed in silencer applications of this kind,
which may include porous urethane, sponge rubber, felt, steel wool,
coiled screening and the like. All of these materials have
different effects in absOrbing sound at various frequencies.
The opposite exit end of the cylindrical member 14 is closed by
another baffle member 34, which comprises a substantially solid
plate supported within a radial recess 36 provided in the
cylindrical member 14, and retained in position by means of a lock
ring 38.
The plate like baffle member 34 is likewise composed of a gas
permeable material having a high porosity, such as for instance
sintered bronze, to permit exit of the muffled air from the chamber
17 to the atmosphere.
In operation: exhausted air, which may be hot in the case of
combustion gas exhaust, enters the silencer structure 10 through
the conduit 12 and inlet 18 for entrance into the expansion chamber
28 of the frustoconical portion 24 of the first baffle member 20.
The exhausted air is expanded in chamber 28 and impinges radially
and axially against the internal surface 30 thereof for penetration
through the porous walls of the first baffle member 20 into the
chamber 17 of the cylindrical member 14 to penetrate through the
sound absorbing material 32, as indicated by the flow arrows.
The initial sound level of the exhausted air, as it enters the
expansion chamber 28, is first considerably reduced by being
minutely broken up as the air penetrates through the porous walls
of the first baffle member into the main chamber of the silencer.
During penetration of the air through the sound absorbing material
32, the sound level is further reduced to a still lower value.
The air then travels through the sound absorbing material 32
towards the rear of the silencer for impingement upon the second,
plate like baffle member 34 and penetration therethrough to the
atmosphere. The plate like exit baffle member 34 further breaks up
the air flow as it penetrates through the porous structure of the
baffle member to thereby still further reduce the noise level as
the air exits to the atmosphere.
With reference now to FIGS. 3 and 4, the embodiment is
substantially similar to the embodiment in FIGS. 1 and 2 and
similar parts are identified by the same reference numerals.
In the silencer of FIGS. 3 and 4, the second outlet baffle member
34 has been replaced by a perforated plate 40 which, as seen in
FIG. 4, is provided with a plurality of holes or apertures 42. The
perforated plate 40 is preferably made of aluminum and the sound
absorbing material 32 in this instance is preferably an open
cellurethane.
This silencer construction is particularly applicable for
installation on air venturies which run on low PSI but normally
create sounds of annoying frequencies.
The improved silencers of the present invention as disclosed
herein, are particularly applicable to absorb sounds created by air
flowing from a pipe such as through an exhaust valve and, depending
on the selection of suitable material, to reduce other noises such
as produced by air tools, combustion engines or the like.
It will be understood that for any particular application, the
sintered bronze used must be of suitable density to provide a
specified pressure drop per square inch for 1 cubic foot air
passage per square inch, which, of course, varies with the
individual application.
Thus, the present invention provides an improved, highly effective,
air exhaust silencer of relatively simple structure which meets the
requirements of the recently amended Walsh-Healey Act concerning
occupational noise exposure and which specifies a maximum noise
level of 90 decibels during any 8 hour period.
The present improved silencer is constructed to reduce the noise
level of exhausted air, and particularly industrial air exhaust, to
well below the required value by the provision of oppositely
disposed, porous, gas permeable baffle members at both ends of an
intermediate sound absorbing media to obtain multiple noise level
reduction as the exhausted air travels through the silencer.
It will be appreciated that in some applications where moist air is
present expanding through orifices at a very high rate, the
exhausting air may take on so much heat that the silencer attached
to the air outlet will freeze solid. In these types of
applications, additional units may have to be applied or,
conversely, the silencer unit will have to be attached as close as
possible to the air motor to permit the frictional heat of the
working parts to be transmitted into the silencer to keep the
cooling effect above the freezing point.
The present improved silencer structures has been tested to not
exceed an allowable limit of 85 dBA at 100 psi air pressure with a
minimum of back pressure within the silencer, in comparison to a
similar length of standard pipe to which the silencer is attached.
Thus, as the air pressure is reduced, the silencer ratings will be
proportionately reduced. Since most industrial plants specify a
pneumatic pressure range between 60 and 80 pounds, several
silencers may be working at any one interval without producing a
sound effect above the acceptable limits set by the provision of
the Walsh-Healy Act, as mentioned above.
While sintered bronze has been referred to in the illustrative
embodiments of the invention, other materials which would be
regarded as equivalent thereto include sintered steel, porous
porcelain or stone or porous plastic materials.
The present invention may be embodied in certain other forms
without departing from the spirit and essential characteristic
thereof, therefore the present embodiment is to be considered
illustrative only and not restrictive, the scopie of the invention
being indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing
description.
Having described our invention, reference should now be had to the
following claims.
* * * * *