U.S. patent number 3,671,810 [Application Number 04/859,025] was granted by the patent office on 1972-06-20 for saturated core transient current limiter.
This patent grant is currently assigned to The Singer Company, New York, NY. Invention is credited to David Morris, Lell E. Barnes.
United States Patent |
3,671,810 |
|
June 20, 1972 |
SATURATED CORE TRANSIENT CURRENT LIMITER
Abstract
A transient current limiting device which includes a saturated
core reactor having its windings in circuit with a power supply and
a load. The magnetic core is biased into saturation for normal load
currents and driven out of saturation by abnormally high transient
load currents, such as currents caused by semiconductor loads which
have been irradiated by high energy electromagnetic radiation. In
one embodiment, the reactor comprises a magnetic core in the form
of a wound toroid which exhibits a square loop hysteresis curve and
includes a permanent magnet for biasing the core into saturation. A
number of configurations are disclosed for placement of the
permanent magnet relative to the core to saturate the magnetic
element. The invention also permits automatic resetting of the
magnetic flux density in the core to saturation when the abnormal
load current is removed.
Inventors: |
Lell E. Barnes (N. Caldwell,
NJ), David Morris (Brooklyn, NY) |
Assignee: |
The Singer Company, New York,
NY (N/A)
|
Family
ID: |
25329802 |
Appl.
No.: |
04/859,025 |
Filed: |
September 18, 1969 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
361/58; 323/310;
336/110; 361/111; 307/401; 323/330; 336/155 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H01F
29/146 (20130101); H02H 9/021 (20130101); H01F
2003/103 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H02H
9/02 (20060101); H01F 29/14 (20060101); H01F
29/00 (20060101); G05f 003/06 () |
Field of
Search: |
;317/20,50 ;323/9,92
;336/165,110,155 ;307/88 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Robert K. Schaefer
Assistant Examiner: William J. Smith
Attorney, Agent or Firm: S. A. Giarratana
Claims
1. An electrical circuit including: a. a direct current source of
power, b. a load, and c. magnetic means in circuit with said source
and said load for limiting the current between said source and load
in the event of a transient short circuit, wherein said magnetic
means comprises an elongate discontinuous magnetic core ring member
having a longitudinal axis and having a center portion and having a
pair of axially spaced opposite end portions defining an air gap
therebetween, a permanent magnet disposed adjacent to both said end
portions of said core and arranged to provide an elongate flux path
coaxially therewith and having sufficient strength for biasing said
magnetic core into saturation for normal load currents, and a
winding wound on said core center portion and connected between
said source and said load and arranged to provide a second elongate
flux path coaxially therewith, said second flux path being directed
opposite to said first flux path and having sufficient strength so
that said core is driven out of saturation by abnormally high load
currents flowing through said
2. The circuit as defined in claim 1 wherein said core is a
toroidal element and said permanent magnet is disposed in said air
gap in such a manner that said magnet is geometrically coextensive
with said toroidal
3. The circuit as defined in claim 1 wherein said core is a
toroidal element and said permanent magnet is positioned adjacent
to the outer
4. A circuit as defined in claim 1 wherein said core is a toroidal
element and said permanent magnet is positioned adjacent to a
radial wall of said
5. A circuit as defined in claim 1 wherein said core ring member is
a portion of an assembly, said assembly including an I section
element and a generally E-shaped magnetic element, said E-shaped
element having an outer pair of legs and a middle leg, said winding
being disposed about at least one of said legs, said E-shaped
element and said I section element being spaced to define said air
gap therebetween, and wherein said permanent magnet is located in
said air gap.
Description
This invention relates to a transient current limiting device. More
particularly, this invention relates to magnetic means in circuit
with a power supply and a load to limit current delivered to the
load under abnormal conditions. Still more particularly, this
invention relates to a saturated core reactor having its winding in
circuit with a power supply and a load wherein the reactor is
biased into saturation for normal load currents, and is driven out
of saturation by abnormally high transient load currents.
It has long been a problem in the electronic art, particularly
since the advent of semiconductors, to limit the current delivered
from a power supply to a load under abnormal conditions. A number
of ways have been developed to solve the problem of limiting
current under such transient conditions. Perhaps the best known is
a fused arrangement which results in an open circuit when the
current flow exceeds a predetermined level. Still other vacuum tube
circuits, semiconductor circuits and magnetic amplifier circuits
have been developed which will either disconnect the power supply
from the load, or which will convert the power supply to a constant
current source to avoid excessive current to the load. Generally,
such approaches have produced complex circuitry and weighty circuit
elements which are quite slow to react to the presence of an
overload.
It is also known in the art that semiconductors and semiconductor
circuitry may momentarily exhibit a short circuit to the power
supply when a semiconductor is bombarded with high energy
radiation, such as gamma rays. Essentially, the shorting effect is
caused when the electromagnetic radiation frees electrons in the
semiconductor material. The free electrons cause the semiconductor
element to become a short circuit load as to the source. Many types
of radiation will produce this effect, including bombardment with
neutrons, electrons, laser beams and gamma rays.
While vacuum tubes and vacuum tube circuits are not generally as
susceptible to electromagnetic radiation as semiconductors, vacuum
tubes and vacuum tube circuits are not entirely satisfactory in
protecting semiconductor circuitry from transient currents caused
by radiation bombardment. In general, such vacuum tube devices are
unsuitable because of the high power supply required and because of
their relatively great weight which precludes their use in present
day circuits.
Moreover, known solutions to current limiting problem are
relatively slow to operate when considered in complex high-speed
circuits, such as computer circuits or specialized communication
circuits. In particular, it is a problem in this art to provide a
transient current limiting device which will preclude delivery of
abnormally high currents to the load in relatively fast times, such
as in nanoseconds. For example, in one particular embodiment, it is
known that the duration of transient currents caused by radiation
on the load existed on the order of 1-10 microseconds so that in a
very particularized environment, it was a problem to preclude
transfer of the transient current to the load for a very short
time.
Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to provide a
transient current limiting device.
It is another object of the invention to provide magnetic means in
circuit with a power supply in a load to limit the transfer of
current therebetween under abnormal load conditions.
It is still a further object of this invention to provide a
saturated core reactor which is biased into saturation for normal
load currents and which is driven out of saturation for abnormally
high currents.
It is another object of this invention to provide a transient
current limiter which comprises a saturable core having a square
loop hysteresis characteristic and which is biased by a permanent
magnet.
It is another object of this invention to provide a current
limiting device which includes a toroidal core having a square loop
hysteresis characteristic which is biased into saturation by a
permanent magnet.
Other and additional objects of the invention will become apparent
from the perusal of the accompanying drawings and the consideration
of the detailed specification which follows.
Directed to a solution to the problem of limiting current between a
power supply and load, particularly under the conditions previously
discussed, this invention comprises a magnetic device which is
connected in series with a load to limit current in the event of a
transient short circuit. The magnetic device is a core biased into
saturation for normal load currents and driven out of saturation
for abnormally high load currents. As the flux in the core reverses
from saturation in one direction to saturation in the other, the
high load current is delayed, and thus limited, particularly due to
the domain switching of the iron core.
In the disclosed embodiments, the winding about the magnetic core
is in circuit with the source and the load. A permanent magnet is
arranged to induce a biasing flux in a flux path in the magnetic
core. Under normal operating conditions, the current delivered to
the load causes a flux in the flux path in a direction opposite to
that induced by the permanent magnet, but which maintains the core
in its saturated state. Under abnormal conditions, the change in
flux in the flux path follows the hysteresis characteristic of the
iron core which, in a preferred embodiment, is a square loop
characteristic. Thus, the saturated magnetic device provides a very
low inductance to the circuit under normal load currents and a time
delay for the delivery of a high load current under abnormal or
short circuit conditions. The device is particularly useful in
preventing high load current caused by shorts due to
electromagnetic radiation because the device itself is not affected
by such radiation. An additional advantage of the invention is that
the protective circuit automatically resets once the abnormal
condition is removed.
In the Drawings:
FIG. 1 is a simplified circuit diagram incorporating the current
limiting device according to the invention;
FIG. 2 is a perspective view of the reactor core showing the
biasing permanent magnet located in a position coextensive with the
geometry of the core;
FIG. 3 is a plan view of the core shown in FIG. 2;
FIG. 4 is an end view of the reactor core of FIG. 2 showing the
position of the permanent magnet biasing means;
FIG. 5 shows the square loop B-H curve for the toroidal core,
illustrating its operation under biasing, normal load, and abnormal
load conditions;
FIG. 6 is a plot of the current supplied by the power supply versus
time over a period including normal operation and abnormal
conditions;
FIG. 7 is a plot of flux density in the core versus time under
conditions shown in FIG. 5;
FIG. 8 is a reactor core similar to the reactor core shown in FIG.
2 wherein the permanent magnet is positioned radially adjacent to
the core;
FIG. 9 is an end view of the reactor core of FIG. 8;
FIG. 10 is a view of the reactor core similar to that shown in FIG.
2 wherein the permanent magnet is positioned axially displaced from
the core;
FIG. 11 is an end view of the reactor core of FIG. 10;
FIG. 12 illustrates the invention as applied to a E-I core
arrangement in which the biasing permanent magnet is positioned in
the middle leg;
FIG. 13 is a generally C-shaped core arrangement in which the
permanent magnet biasing means is positioned in a portion of the
core;
FIG. 14 depicts the variation of the core of FIG. 12 in which the
windings are positioned on the legs of the E element and the
permanent magnet is positioned adjacent the middle leg;
FIG. 15 is an end view of the structure shown in FIG. 14; and
FIG. 16 is a side view of the structure shown in FIG. 14.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
An electrical circuit is shown in FIG. 1 which illustrates one
embodiment for incorporating the current limiting means according
to the invention. A source 10 of power provides current in a series
circuit by way of leads 17 and 18 to load 11. Current limiter 12,
according to the invention, is in series circuit between the power
supply 10 and load 11. Current limiter 12 is diagramatically
illustrated as including a core 14 of saturable magnetic material.
Winding 15 on the core 14 is in series circuit with the source 10
and load 11. A permanent magnet 16 serves to bias the magnetic
element into saturation for normal load currents. The core 14 will
be driven out of saturation by abnormally high load currents
flowing through the winding 15 such as would be caused, for
example, by the presence of electromagnetic radiation on
semiconductor load elements.
The current limiter 12 as shown in greater detail in FIG. 2
comprises a reactor 20 including toroid 21 of magnetically
permeable material with winding 24 disposed thereon. In this
embodiment, toroidal core 21 defines faces 22 and 23 to provide a
gap in the toroid.
A permanent magnet 25 is positioned in the gap between faces 22 and
23 geometrically coextensive with the toroidal core 21. Air gaps of
a predetermined width may be defined between the permanent magnet
25 and the core 21 according to the requirements of the magnetic
circuit, or the poles of the permanent magnet 25 may be contiguous
with the generally planar end faces 22 and 23 of the core 21.
As may be seen in FIGS. 3 and 4, the permanent magnet 25 has a
magnetic north pole 26 and a magnetic south pole 27 and is
positioned with respect to the toroidal core 21 so that poles 26
and 27 are coextensive with the planar faces 22 and 23 and with the
geometrical configuration of the core.
In FIGS. 2 through 4 the core 21, the winding 24, and the magnet 25
correspond to the core 14, the winding 15, and the magnet 16 in the
circuit of FIG. 1. As an alternate embodiment, the reactor core may
be biased by the presence of an additional winding about the core
having a predetermined number of turns in a manner resembling
winding 24 instead of by a permanent magnet.
While the reactor core may be made from iron having conventional
hysteresis characteristics which exhibit saturation levels of flux
density, it is preferred that the core be of a material which
exhibits a square loop hysteresis characteristic as shown by the
plot of flux density B versus magnetomotive force H in FIG. 5.
When the power supply 10 is delivering no current to the load 11,
the magnetomotive force on the reactor core provided by the
permanent magnet 16 biases the core well into saturation to the
position on the hysteresis loop designated by reference numeral 35
as shown in FIG. 5. The winding 15 is connected between the load 11
and the power supply 10 with a polarity so the magnetomotive force
opposes that of the permanent magnet 16. Accordingly, when load
current flows through the winding 15, the operating point on the
hysteresis curve will move back along the lower portion 30 of the
hysteresis loop toward zero magnetomotive force represented by the
axis 37. When maximum normal power is delivered to the load, the
resulting current through the winding 15 will move the operating
point on the hysteresis loop to the position designated by the
reference numeral 36. The core, however, remains in a saturated
state. Variation in load current less than the maximum normal value
will cause only small changes in the total flux in the core because
the core will remain in saturation.
If the load should exhibit a momentary short circuit, the increased
transient current flowing through winding 15 will cause the
operating point to move along the lower portion 30 of the
hysteresis loop past the knee 38 of the hysteresis loop and into
the leg 33 of the hysteresis loop, thus driving the core out of
saturation. When the core has been driven out of saturation into
the leg 33 of the hysteresis loop further increases in current will
cause large changes in flux in the core. Thus, the winding 15
carrying the load current will exhibit a high value of inductance
opposing further increases in load current. In this manner, the
current limiter 12 prevents high transient current from flowing
into the load during momentary shorting of the load 11.
The change in flux in the core follows the well known equation:
e = KNd.phi./dt 1 where K is a constant N is the number of turns e
is the applied voltage .phi. is the flux in the flux path of the
reactor core, and t is time From equation 1 therefore:
.phi. = 1/KN .intg. edt 2 in which .phi. represents the change in
flux over the time of the integral.
But .phi. = BA, where B is the flux density in the flux path of the
core and A is the cross sectional area of the core. Therefore, from
equation (2):
B = 1/KNA .intg. edt 3 in which B represents the change in flux
density over the time of the integral.
For a predetermined number of turns and a predetermined
cross-sectional area of the core, the change in flux density is
given by the equation:
B = K.sub.2 .intg. edt 4
For the case in which the applied voltage e is a constant E equal
to the power supply voltage the solution of the integral is:
B = K.sub.2 Et = K.sub.e t
When a momentary short in the load drives the core out of
saturation into the leg 33 of the hysteresis loop, the flux density
must change from -B.sub.2 to +B.sub.s amounting to a total change
of 2B.sub.s before the core is driven all the way to the positive
saturation level. Thus, from equation (5) in order for the total
change in flux to equal 2B.sub.s the time t must equal 2B.sub.s
/K.sub.3 . Accordingly, if the time of the momentary short is less
than 2B.sub.s /K.sub.3 , the current limiter will prevent the high
transient current from being applied to the load. Thus, for short
term transient currents, the device according to the invention
provides an effective means for limiting transient currents for
limited times.
FIG. 6, which shows a plot of the supply current from the power
supply 10 against time, is exemplary of the operation of the
circuit when a momentary short occurs. The portion 40 of the curve
is the condition when no current is being delivered to the load. At
t = t.sub.1 , the load is connected to the power supply and the
current rises to a level represented by the portion 41 of the
curve. At t = t.sub.2 in the example of FIG. 6, the load exhibits a
transient short circuit condition.
At a very short time thereafter, t = t.sub.3 , the start of the
flux excursion time from -B.sub.s to +B.sub.s , as shown in FIG. 5
occurs. The time difference between t.sub.2 and t.sub.3 is that
necessary for the operating point 36 on the hysteresis loop of FIG.
5 to move from point 36 to the knee 38 of the hysteresis loop at
which the core is driven out of saturation and begins to follow the
leg 33 of the hysteresis loop. At time t.sub.4 the short circuit
ends before the core has been driven to positive saturation and the
current only increases to the level 42 in response to the momentary
short circuit. The core is then reset to negative saturation by the
permanent magnet to a range between the points 35 and 36 on the
hysteresis loop for normal load currents.
The plot of flux density in the core against time in the example
described with reference to FIG. 6 is shown in FIG. 7. Prior to
time t.sub.1 before the load current is applied, the flux density
is the negative saturation value -B.sub.s. During the time interval
from t = t.sub.1 to t = t.sub.2, when the circuit is operating
normally, the flux density in the reactor core, as shown by the
portion of the curve designated by the reference numeral 46,
continues at the negative saturation level. From t = t.sub.2 to t =
t.sub.3, as shown by the portion of the curve designated by
reference numeral 47, the flux density remains at the negative
saturation level. But during the time from t = t.sub.3 to t =
t.sub.4, during which the flux is going from negative saturation
toward positive saturation as shown by the portion of the curve 48,
the flux density changes rapidly from -B.sub.s toward the positive
saturation level +B.sub.s. At the end of the short on the load at
time t.sub.4, the flux density returns, as shown by the portion of
the curve 49 in FIG. 7, to its negative saturation level -B.sub.s.
Thus, FIG. 7 illustrates the ability of the circuit to reset after
the removal of the short circuit on the load.
The speed of resetting is determined by the leakage reactance for
the winding and the time required for magnetic domain rotation. In
a toroidal winding, the leakage reactance may be considered
negligible and may be made quite small by proper winding. Thus, the
reset speed becomes nearly a direct function of the magnetic domain
rotation from positive saturation to negative saturation. Such
switching may occur in a very short time, such as in
nanoseconds.
FIG. 8 depicts an alternate embodiment of the invention comprising
a reactor 60 in the form of a toroidal core 61 having a winding 62
disposed thereon. Core 61 defines an air gap 63 between faces 64
and 65. Permanent magnet biasing means 66 are disposed adjacent to
the outer cylindrical wall of the core, bridging the air gap 63.
FIG. 9 is an end view of the core 61 illustrating the portion of
the permanent magnet 66 with respect to the core 61.
The embodiment shown in FIGS. 10 and 11 comprises a reactor 70 in
the form of a magnetic core 71 having winding 72 disposed thereon.
A permanent magnet 76 is disposed adjacent to a radial wall of the
core 71 bridging the air gap 73 defined by faces 74 and 75 of the
core. An additional permanent magnet may be disposed adjacent to
the other radial wall of the core 71 axially opposite the permanent
magnet 76.
In the embodiments of FIGS. 8 and 10, the relationship of the
various parameters of the magnetic circuit are such that cores 61
and 71 are biased into saturation according to the invention as
previously discussed.
The embodiment of the invention as shown in FIG. 12 comprises an
E-I lamination 80 including outer legs 81 and 82 and middle leg 83
having a winding 84 disposed thereon. Permanent magnet 88 is
disposed in a gap between middle leg 83 and I section 89 to bias
the reactor 80 into saturation as described above. As illustrated,
the configuration of the permanent magnet 88 is such that it is
geometrically coextensive with the face 86 of the middle leg 83. An
air gap may be provided between end face 86 and the adjacent pole
of permanent magnet 88, as well as between the opposite pole of
permanent magnet 88 and the adjacent wall of the I section 89.
FIG. 13 is another embodiment of the current limiter comprising a
C-shaped core 90 having winding 91 disposed thereon. The C-shaped
core defines a gap in which a permanent magnet 93 is positioned. As
in the preceeding embodiments, the strength of permanent magnet 93
is such to bias the core 90 into saturation under normal operating
conditions.
In the embodiment of the invention shown in FIGS. 14 through 16, an
E-I lamination similar to that shown in FIG. 12 comprises a reactor
100 having outer legs 101 and 102 and middle leg 103. Windings 105
and 106 are connected in a series aiding relationship and are
disposed on legs 101 and 102 respectively. An I section 107 is
disposed to bridge the end faces of the legs 101, 102 and 103 and a
permanent magnet 108 is disposed bridging an air gap defined
between middle leg 103 and I section 107.
The operation of the current limiter of FIGS. 12 through 15 is in
accordance with the discussion of the FIG. 2 and the curves shown
in FIGS. 5 through 7 and accordingly is not repeated in detail
here.
Each of the above described current limiters will effectively
protect against momentary short circuits in the load. The current
limiters are particularly useful in protecting against short
circuits caused by intense radiation such as gamma radiation
because the current limiters themselves are virtually unaffected by
such radiation.
* * * * *