U.S. patent number 3,667,636 [Application Number 05/092,728] was granted by the patent office on 1972-06-06 for safety-closure device.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Eyelet Specialty Company. Invention is credited to William James Landen.
United States Patent |
3,667,636 |
Landen |
June 6, 1972 |
SAFETY-CLOSURE DEVICE
Abstract
The invention contemplates selectively openable closure means
that is tamper-proof, in the sense that a correct sequence of two
deliberate and independent movements of two parts is necessary in
order to achieve access to the contents of the bottle or the like
which is protected by the closure. The specific construction that
is described involves a bottle with a neck having a circular
opening, and a closure cap having a cylindrical wall to overlap and
lock to the outer surface of the neck. The closed end of the cap
has an axially tapering yieldable section which engages the
circular neck opening in the course of closing the bottle. The
nature of the lock is such as to preload the yieldable engagement
and to utilize the resilient action to retain the lock and to
establish a liquid seal of the bottle contents.
Inventors: |
Landen; William James
(Cheshire, CT) |
Assignee: |
Eyelet Specialty Company
(Wallingford, CT)
|
Family
ID: |
22234812 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/092,728 |
Filed: |
November 25, 1970 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
215/214;
215/222 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B65D
41/065 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B65D
41/06 (20060101); B65D 41/04 (20060101); A61j
001/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;215/9,44 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Hall; George T.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. Tamper-proof selectively operable closure means, comprising a
body including a neck with a circular axial-end opening, and a cap
for selectively opening and closing said opening, said cap and the
exterior of said neck having coacting telescoping parts for
removably securing the same, and said cap and the bore of said neck
having coacting telescoping parts including axially yieldable means
having circumferentially continuous resiliently loaded contact with
said opening when said cap is in secured position, said securing
means including removably engageable bayonet lug and bayonet
cul-de-sac formations; said cul-de-sac formation being
characterized by a pocket having a restricted entrance which is
axially open in one direction and radially open in one direction,
said formation being further characterized by opposed angularly
spaced sidewalls which are converged to a throat at said entrance,
one of said sidewalls within said pocket being generally helically
sloped from said throat and in the direction across said entrance,
the other of said sidewalls within said pocket being angularly
undercut in the direction away from said wall at the region of said
helical slope; said lug formation extending radially and axially
and being torsionally flexible about a generally radial axis
through said lug formation, said lug formation being of thickness
to pass said entrance, and the axial extent of said lug formation
being at least no greater than the minimum axial span of said
undercut portion of said other sidewall.
2. Closure means according to claim 1, in which said lug formations
extend radially inwardly of said cap.
3. Closure means according to claim 1, in which said lug formations
are integrally formed with the material of said cap.
4. Closure means according to claim 3, in which said cap and lug
formations are a single molded piece of plastic material.
5. Closure means according to claim 1, in which said cul-de-sac
formations are integrally formed with the material of said
neck.
6. Closure means according to claim 5, in which said body and neck
and cul-de-sac formations are a single molded piece of glass.
7. Closure means according to claim 1, in which said sidewalls at
the axially open end of said entrance converge in the direction of
approach to said throat.
8. Closure means according to claim 1, in which said lug formations
are provided in plurality, equally angularly spaced about the
central axis of said cap, and wherein said cul-de-sac formation is
a recess within a radially outwardly extending arcuate lobe on said
neck, the effective arcuate extent of said lobe exceeding the
angular space between adjacent lug formations, whereby telescoping
overlap of said cap and neck can only proceed when a lug formation
enters said cul-de-sac formation.
9. Closure means according to claim 8, in which said lobe is
provided in plurality about said neck at such effective angular
spacing between adjacent entrance throats as to be an integer
multiple of the angular spacing between adjacent lug
formations.
10. Closure means according to claim 9, in which the plurality of
said lobes is two, in which the number of lug formations is an even
number, and in which said lobes are diametrically opposed.
11. Closure means according to claim 8, in which a radial lug
integral with said neck and having a cap-lug retention surface
substantially in the radial plane of said undercut is angularly
offset from said undercut, substantially to the extent of an
integer multiple of the angular spacing between adjacent lug
formations of said cap.
12. Closure means according to claim 9, in which two diametrically
opposed radial lugs project integrally from said neck at locations
intermediate said lobes, said last two lugs having cap-lug
retention surfaces substantially in the radial plane of said
undercuts and being on a diametrical alignment that is angularly
offset from the diametrical alignment of said undercuts,
substantially to the extent of an integer multiple of the angular
spacing between adjacent lug formations of said cap.
13. Closure means according to claim 12, in which the number of
cap-lug formations is eight and in which the alignment of said
neck-lug formations is substantially perpendicular to the alignment
of said undercuts.
14. Closure means according to claim 1, in which the effective
angular extent of said undercut is at least as great as the
thickness of said lug formation.
15. Closure means according to claim 1, in which said one sidewall
is substantially axially oriented at said throat and is smoothly
and continuously faired to said generally helically sloped portion
of said one sidewall.
16. Closure means according to claim 1, in which said cap is of
single-piece molded-plastic construction, the securing telescoping
portion of said cap including a relatively thick and rigid annulus
with which said lug formations are integral, the yieldable
telescoping portion of said cap being relatively thin and flexible
and being of inwardly tapering configuration at the region of
contact with said opening.
17. Closure means according to claim 16, in which said lug
formations are in a general radial-plane location that is axially
displaced from the general axial region of the yieldable
telescoping portion of said cap.
18. Closure means according to claim 1, in which said one sidewall
is a substantially continuous helix for substantially its length,
spanning said throat and pocket regions.
19. Closure means according to claim 1, in which said undercut
includes axial and angular components of offset from the throat
region of said other sidewall.
20. Closure means according to claim 1, in which within said pocket
said other sidewall includes a substantial axially extending wall
portion of length greater than the effective axial length of said
lug formation.
21. Closure means according to claim 1, in which said cap has a
closure wall which includes a radially yieldable tapering section
having initial interference with the circular neck opening prior to
achieving the ultimate axial overlap which represents full securing
of the cap to the neck, whereby when fully secured the tapering
section is resiliently stressed into closing and sealing contact
with said neck.
Description
This invention relates to tamper-proof selectively openable closure
devices, as for closure of bottles containing liquid or solid
matter that might be injurious when in unauthorized hands.
With recent growth in the use of drugs, pills, and the like, each
with its specific prescribed purpose for a particular member of the
household, there has been a corresponding increase in the chances
for unauthorized access, particularly access by small children. And
it has become increasingly difficult, if not impossible, to
supervise children enough to assure against their access to
materials that can be harmful to them.
Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to provide a
tamper-proof feature in containers for materials of the character
indicated.
A specific object is to achieve the above-stated object with a
construction in which a correct sequence of independent motions of
two parts is a pre-requisite for access to the contents of the
container.
Another object is to achieve the foregoing objects with a simple
construction, involving the addition of no parts, beyond the
container and its closure.
A further object is to provide a closure meeting the above objects
and establishing a liquid seal.
A specific object is to provide a bottle and cap with integral
locking and sealing formations which inherently achieve all the
foregoing objects.
Another specific object is to achieve the stated objects using
resilient deformable action of one of the parts to establish both a
resiliently pre-loaded seal and resiliently pre-loaded lock
retention.
It is also a specific object to provide a closure of the character
indicated, wherein sealed closure is established by essentially
only axially driving the cap onto the neck, and yet wherein a
specific combination of further axial drive and correct rotation
are needed in order to release the closure.
Other objects and various further features of novelty and invention
will be pointed out or will occur to those skilled in the art from
a reading of the following specification in conjunction with the
accompanying drawings. In said drawings, which show, for
illustrative purposes only, preferred forms of the invention:
FIG. 1 is an exploded fragmentary view in perspective showing the
neck region of a bottle, above which closure-cap means of the
invention is poised for application;
FIG. 2 is a vertical sectional view of the cap means of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is an end view of the cap means of FIG. 1;
FIG. 4 is a fragmentary view in elevation of the neck region of
FIG. 1;
FIG. 5 is a top view of the neck region of FIG. 1;
FIGS. 6 to 9, inclusive, are simplified views to illustrate a
series of parts relationships in the course of operating the
closure means of FIG. 1; and
FIG. 10 is a view similar to those of FIGS. 6 to 9, to illustrate a
modification.
Referring to the drawings, the invention is shown in application to
a bottle 10 and to a selectively removable closure cap 11 therefor.
The bottle 10 may be of any suitable material but is conveniently
of glass, being integrally formed with a reduced neck 12 having a
circular axial-end opening to be selectively opened and closed by
the cap 11. The bottle 10 is shown to be further integral with
locking formations 13-13' which project radially outwardly at
angularly spaced locations on the neck 12.
The cap 11 is of deformable material such as a plastic having good
memory, good flexural properties, a low coefficient of friction and
relative inertness to most household chemicals; such materials
include polypropylene and polyethylene, each of which lends itself
to injection-molding of the cap 11.
The cap 11 is generally cup-shaped, comprising an outer cylindrical
wall portion 14 which is relatively thick (and therefore relatively
rigid) and which telescopically overlaps the neck 12. The portion
14 includes angularly spaced integral inwardly projecting lugs 15,
for locking engagement with the neck formations 13-13'. The closed
end of the cap is preferably relatively thin, to permit local
deformation at a converging taper zone 16, as will be explained in
detail.
In the form shown, the converging taper 16 is generally
frusto-conical, having limiting radii R.sub.1 -R.sub.2 (FIG. 2)
which straddle the radii R.sub.3 -R.sub.4 (FIG. 4) of the chamfered
circular opening of the bore 17 of neck 12. Taper 16 is integral
with a short cylindrical portion 18 which is integrally connected
to outer wall 14 by a short annulus 19, dished slightly inwardly;
and the inner end of taper 16 is integrally closed by a flat
circular panel 20. In FIG. 2, .alpha. marks the angle of taper 16,
and .beta. marks the flare or dished angle of the annulus 19.
In locked condition, the cap lugs 15 engage the recesses or
undersides 21-21' of the formations 13-13', and in this condition
the taper 16 has engaged the chamfered end of the neck bore 17, and
is radially inwardly deformed thereby. Since cap 11 is of
low-friction material, the compliant reaction to such deformation
produces an axially separating force between neck 12 and cap 11,
and this force resiliently loads and retains the engagements at
15-21 and 15-21'. The same resilient action radially outwardly
loads the taper 16 in its contact with bore 17, thus establishing a
liquid-retaining seal of the contents of the bottle 10.
In accordance with the invention, the lug formations 15 and the
projecting neck formations 13-13' engageable therewith are such
that a locked and sealed closure results from essentially only an
axially depressed application of cap 11 to the bottle neck 12, and
yet that a combination of further axial depression, coupled with a
particular rotational torque, are necessary to achieve an unlocking
access to the contents of the bottle. To achieve this result, the
locking formations 13 may be repeated at each and every angular
location of lug formations 15, but as shown (see FIG. 5) the neck
formations 13 occur at two diametrically spaced locations; the
formations 13' are of more simple nature, being relied upon only
for their flat retaining undersurfaces 21' and being at opposed
angular locations between the locking formations 13. The lug
formations 15 are shown as eight like, equally spaced blades,
extending radially inwardly and being axially elongate for the
distance x from the open end of the cap 11. Due to the proportions
and material of the lug formations 15, being molded integrally with
cap 11, each lug formation 15 is inherently characterized by a
degree of relatively stiff torsionally flexible action, about its
axially central radial axis; the stiff torsional compliance of this
action is relied upon to achieve a snap-action lock and seal of the
bottle, upon essentially only axially depressed placement of the
cap 11.
Each of the formations 13-13' projects radially outwardly from the
otherwise cylindrical outer surface 22 of the neck 12. This
cylindrical surface 22 extends from a base flange 23 to the open
end of neck 12 and overlaps the axial span of the formations
13-13'. The formations 13 are of effective angular extent .delta.
(FIG. 5) which preferably exceeds the effective angular spacing
.gamma. between adjacent lugs 15 (FIG. 3), thus frustrating any
axial assembly of the cap 11 to the neck 12 without first achieving
a substantially correct alignment, as will be explained. As shown,
for the two locking formations 13 and two auxiliary retaining
formations 13', the lugs 15 are provided in a plurality of eight.
Thus, for any locked setting of the cap, only four lugs 15 are used
for retention; however, the radially inner limits of lugs 15
preferably just clear the diameter of the neck surface 22, so that
all lugs 15 provide a stabilizing action for coaxially piloting cap
12 to the neck 11. Lugs 15 also abut flange 23, to prevent
excessive depression of cap 12 in the course of establishing a
locked seal.
The locking formation 13 comprises a lobe or radial projection
integral with the neck 12 and having a pocket which is a
cul-de-sac, beneath the retaining surface 21. The pocket is open
axially upward and radially outward, to receive axial insertion of
a suitably positioned one of the plural lug formations 15.
Basically, the pocket is defined by two spaced sidewalls 24-25;
these walls are shown flaring outwardly from the throat 26 of the
upwardly open inlet passage, thus tending to "funnel" or angularly
align the cap for lug entry at the throat 26; the angular gap at
throat 26 is preferably slightly in excess of the effective
thickness of each lug 15. Beneath the throat, wall 24 is sharply
undercut, with angular and axial offset, to define the retaining
surface 21, and a depending flat axial portion 27 completes the
description of wall 24. Beneath the throat, the other wall 25 is
sloped generally helically in the angular direction toward wall 24,
and the pocket or cul-de-sac is closed by a relatively sharp
intersection with the axial wall portion 27; the numeral 28
identifies this generally helical portion. As shown, the generally
helical portion 28 is smoothly and tangentially faired to the
throat portion of wall 25, and the advance of the helix is reduced
in approach to wall portion 27, so that at their intersection the
wall portions 27-28 are substantially perpendicular.
In the design of particular lug and cul-de-sac proportions, the
effective axial length x (FIG. 2) of the lugs 15 should be less
than the maximum axial span L.sub.1 of the cul-de-sac (FIG. 4), and
the length x should exceed the minimum axial span L.sub.2 thereof.
Also, preferably, the upper edge 29 (FIG. 2) of each lug 15 should
be sloped in accordance with that of the under-cut 21; in FIG. 4,
this angle or rake is identified by the symbol .DELTA. and is shown
as substantially 15.degree., back from a plane radially of the
closure axis. Finally, the effective angular offset or width W of
the undercut 21 should be such that, with a lug 15 twisted to
bottom at the intersection of wall portions 27-28, the effective
lug length x is just short of interference with the projecting lip
or throat end of the undercut 21.
Based on relationships and properties as described, it will be
helpful to consider a cycle of operation, in reference to the
sequence of simplified diagrams of FIGS. 6 to 9.
FIG. 6 displays a parts relationship for a point in time when one
of the lugs 15 has been caused to enter the throat 26 and in which
reacting interference [(a) of the lug buttom with wall portion 28,
and (b) of the lug side wall with wall 24 at the throat] have
developed a lug-twisting torque. Further cap depression produces
further twisting of lug 15 as it enters further into the cul-de-sac
(FIG. 7). Final cap depression is limited by bottom contact at
intersection of surfaces 27-28, by which time the lug 15 has
cleared the projecting or throat edge of undercut 21, whereupon lug
15 resiliently restores itself to its original axial orientation,
parallel to or flat alongside of the axial wall portion 27.
In the course of the axial depression which resulted in this
latching or locking engagement, an initial interference developed
between the neck chamfer and the conical formation 16; this
interference entailed a resilient inward deformation of the cone 16
to the extent that residual axial force is exerted to axially
outwardly propel the cap 11, were it not for lug 15 retention by
the undercut 21. Preferably, the point of initial neck-to-cone
inference occurs axially outwardly of the locked relationship (FIG.
8) so that the undercut 21 retains the assembly, with a residium of
axially outward resilient loading.
Now, if one tries to remove the cap by purely axial action, or by
purely angular (e.g., the normal "unthreading") actuation, there
will be nothing but frustration, because the lug 15 will jam itself
between the limits of the restriction L.sub.2 (FIG. 4). On the
other hand, if the cap 11 is further displaced against its axial
resilient load (to bottom at intersection of 27-28), and if the cap
11 and bottle 10 are then twisted in the "unthreading" direction,
lug 15 will be caused to twist again about its central radial axis
and to conform to the generally helical sidewall portion 28 (FIG.
9); the cap is then removed by axial displacement while maintaining
the "unthreading" torque.
FIG. 10 illustrates a modification wherein the generally helical
sidewall 24' is strictly helical, all the way from a point axially
outside the throat 26, to the bottom 30, immediately adjacent the
axial wall portion 27; bottom 30 is at a right angle to wall
portion 27 and is substantially the effective width of lug 15. The
cul-de-sac formation is otherwise as already described. The uniform
helix of FIG. 10 provides uniform sliding action for the twisted
lug, during locking and unlocking functions, as will be clear. And
the intersection between wall 24' and bottom 30 provides a discrete
"corner" by which the corresponding bottom corner of lug 15 may be
fulcrumed, in developing the twist needed for cap removal.
It will be seen that the invention meets all the stated objects.
The two parts are readily fabricated with existing molding
techniques, and liquid seal at a locked closure is repeatedly
established, for each access to the container contents. The
provision of lugs 13' establishes retaining surfaces for those lugs
15 which are spaced at a right angle from the lugs 15 relied upon
for lock action, thereby stabilizing cap orientation when locked
and sealed. Moreover, such lugs 13' are readily adapted to standard
molding techniques, as suggested by identification of a parting
line 31 (FIG. 5) between mold halves for the bottle 10.
In an illustrative use of my invention with materials of the
character set forth above, the bottle neck surface 22 is of 1-inch
diameter. The projecting throat end or lip of the undercut 21 is
0.3 inch axially in from the open end of the bottle. The lugs 15
are about 0.23-inch in axial length, 0.055-inch in thickness, and
have about a 1-mil clearance with the surface 22; the formations
13-13' have a similar close clearance with the bore of cap 11,
between lugs 15. The outside diameter of flange 23 is preferably
slightly exceeded by the maximum outside diameter of cap 11, for
appearance's sake. And the bottom surface of flat 20 has about
0.05-inch clearance with the radial plane of the upper ends of lugs
15.
While the invention has been described in detail for the preferred
forms shown, it will be understood that modifications may be made
without departure from the invention.
* * * * *