U.S. patent number 3,663,214 [Application Number 05/011,491] was granted by the patent office on 1972-05-16 for abrasion resistant cast iron.
Invention is credited to Harry H. Kessler, William H. Moore.
United States Patent |
3,663,214 |
Moore , et al. |
May 16, 1972 |
**Please see images for:
( Certificate of Correction ) ** |
ABRASION RESISTANT CAST IRON
Abstract
A wear and abrasion resistant white iron having a composition as
follows: And having a microstructure of predominantly chunky or
needle carbides in a matrix predominantly austenitic.
Inventors: |
Moore; William H. (Purchase,
NY), Kessler; Harry H. (Ladue, MO) |
Family
ID: |
21750617 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/011,491 |
Filed: |
February 16, 1970 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
420/15 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C22C
38/38 (20130101); C22C 37/06 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
C22C
37/06 (20060101); C22C 38/38 (20060101); C22C
37/00 (20060101); C22c 039/16 (); C22c
039/32 () |
Field of
Search: |
;148/35
;75/126A,126B,128D,128A,125,123CB,123N |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Rutledge; L. Dewayne
Assistant Examiner: Legru; J. E.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A wear-resistant white iron having a substantially austenitic
structure containing predominantly trigonal and orthorhombic
chromium-manganese carbides consisting essentially of from 7.0 to
15.0 percent manganese, 8.0 to 15.0 percent chromium, 3.0 to 4.0
percent total carbon, 0 to 2.5 percent silicon, and with the total
of manganese and chromium being at least 15.0 percent.
2. White iron in the composition range of:
Description
Our invention relates to a white cast iron and, more particularly,
to a chromium-bearing white cast iron, having a combination of
toughness and hardness, making it suitable to resist abrasion and
wear when used for grinding or crushing ores, cements, rocks, and
the like.
Many white cast irons are available for this purpose; most of them
relying on the presence of hard iron carbides in their
metallurgical structure, to provide a degree of wear resistance.
Other white cast irons are alloyed with chromium, manganese,
nickel, copper, vanadium, molybdenum, and the like, to provide
harder carbides and, also, to improve the overall hardness of the
matrix structure.
Some superior white cast irons, containing from 8 to 30 percent
chromium are also in common use. Chromium provides particularly
hard carbides and, when present in sufficient amount and under the
right conditions, radically alters the structure of the carbides,
so that they occur as cubic or needle-like particles quite
different from massive carbides normally present in chromium-free
cast irons.
Irons of this type have a ferritic matrix structure, unless alloys,
such as nickel, are used to provide austenitic, bainitic or
martensitic matrices. An object of this invention is to provide a
wear resistant chromium-bearing cast iron containing orthorhombic
or trigonal (chunky) carbides in an austenitic matrix.
A further object is to provide a white wear-resistant cast iron
with an austenitic matrix, but not containing essential amounts of
strategic and costly alloys, such as nickel and molybdenum.
A further object of this invention is to provide a wear-resistant
white cast iron, wherein the improved wear characteristics of
chromium are combined effectively with the wear characteristics of
manganese, resulting in a white cast iron having a high degree of
toughness for wear applications where some pounding impact is
involved.
Still further objects may be apparent from the specification and
the drawings in which;
FIG. 1 is a photomicrograph showing the structure of a prior art
chromium and manganese-bearing cast iron in which the balance of
these elements is such that the structure is similar to that of a
white cast iron (magnification 400);
FIG. 2 is a photomicrograph showing the structure at 100
magnification of the alloy of this invention, wherein the chromium
and manganese are correctly balanced and where the carbides exist
as chunks having the trigonal and orthorhombic configuration;
FIG. 3 is an enlarged photomicrograph at 500 magnification of the
alloy of this invention showing the typical austenitic matrix
distinguished also by small quantities of low temperature pearlite,
as indicated.
It has been established by those skilled in the art, that chromium,
in sufficient amount, has a peculiar effect on the carbides that
occur in a white cast iron. A sufficient amount of chromium,
usually at least 8 percent by weight, produces first, a needle-like
carbide known as an orthorhombic carbide supposedly having the
composition (FeCr).sub.3 C. Increasing amounts of chromium, beyond
this amount or a higher carbon equivalent value in the white cast
iron, produce a chunky carbide known as a "trigonal" carbide,
supposedly having the composition (FeCr).sub.7 C.sub.3.
The occurrence of substantial amounts of orthorhombic and, more
particularly, trigonal carbides in the structure of the white cast
iron, produces an increased impact resistance which largely
contributes to the improved wear-resistant qualities exhibited by
these cast irons.
It has been established, also, that increasing the carbon content
and the silicon content of chromium-bearing cast iron, favors the
increased production of orthorhombic and trigonal carbides. These
carbides owe their presence to a hypereutectic composition, which
enables them to be precipitated, first, from the melt during the
process of solidification. While higher carbon and silicon contents
do provide a more hypereutectic composition, it is still necessary
to have at least about 8 percent chromium, before these preferred
carbide types will be predominant in the structure.
It is also well known by those skilled in the art that manganese,
as an alloying element, when used in sufficient amount, will
produce an austenitic matrix structure. Austenite is particularly
desirable as it can readily be decomposed by heat treatment by cold
treatment or by mechanical working into martensite, which has a
high intrinsic hardness, conferring considerably more wear
resistance to any ferrous material. However, manganese, as an
alloying element, alone, is incapable of producing carbides having
the preferred orthorhombic or trigonal structure. Further than
this, where manganese is present in the composition of the carbides
of a white iron, it is not free to perform its function of
producing an austenitic matrix. For this reason, relatively large
amounts of manganese (at least about 7 percent), are necessary in a
white iron containing carbides, to produce a predominantly
austenitic structure.
We have discovered that manganese and chromium can be used together
in a white cast iron in such a way that both orthorhombic and
trigonal carbides can be produced simultaneously with an austenitic
matrix, thereby providing a cast iron of unusual wear resisting
characteristics. This is quite an unusual effect, when it is
considered that manganese and chromium are quite opposite in nature
and would tend to counteract each other, when used together.
Chromium is a ferrite former, tending to prevent the retension of
austenite, whereas manganese tends to promote the formation of
austenite.
We do not know why manganese is able to prevent the formation of
ferrite, which is commonly present in high chromium cast irons,
particularly because a large percentage of the manganese is tied up
in the formation of carbides.
As a matter of fact, electro-probe analysis shows that, in the
carbide phase the manganese to chromium ratio is about three to one
with manganese at 36 percent and chromium at 12 percent; whereas in
the matrix the manganese to chromium ratio is one to two, with
manganese at 5 percent and chromium at about 10 percent.
We presume that there must be sufficient manganese present in the
matrix to promote austenite and that, when manganese and chromium
are used together, in sufficient amount, the austenite to ferrite
change is rendered so sluggish that austenite is retained.
We have found that, up to 40 percent low temperature pearlite may
also occur in the matrix, but that it is still predominantly
austenitic. We have found that a manganese content of at least 7
percent and a chromium content of at least 8 percent and a combined
manganese and chromium content of at least 15 percent, is necessary
to produce the preferred structure of the alloy of our invention.
The combination we actually prefer to use, under most conditions,
is equal parts of manganese and chromium at about 10 to 12 percent
of each element. We find that this particular combination is less
sensitive to sectional variations in castings.
There is no upper limit to the amounts of manganese and chromium we
can use, but in the interests of economy and to maintain good
casting and foundry characteristics, we prefer to limit the
combined manganese and chromium content to about 30 percent, with
manganese up to 15 percent and chromium up to 15%.
It is well known that other alloys, particularly nickel, may be
used in conjunction with chromium, to provide cast irons having an
austenitic matrix and white cast irons containing orthorhombic and
trigonal carbides. Nickel, however, is a strategic alloy, not
always readily available in unlimited quantity to the producers of
wear resistant castings and nickel, also, is a relatively expensive
alloy, being at least five times as expensive and often eighty
times as manganese. The application of manganese, as an essential
alloying ingredient in the alloy of our invention, therefore, has
solved an industrial problem of some magnitude. The use of nickel,
as a tramp element or in small quantities, by deliberate intent, is
not precluded from our alloy composition, providing the manganese
and the chromium present are sufficient to provide the preferred
structure, if the nickel were entirely absent.
By the same token, alloys like molybdenum, are often used in high
chromium cast irons or in manganese cast irons, to provide an
increased tendency to form a martensitic or bainitic matrix
structure. Molybdenum also is a highly strategic and expensive
alloy and would, therefore, not normally be present in any
appreciable amount in the alloy composition of our invention. It
may be used for special effects, where desired, providing that the
manganese and chromium contents present are, by themselves, present
in sufficient amount to produce the preferred structure of
orthorhombic and trigonal carbides in an austenitic matrix.
Alloys, such as tungsten (acting similarly to molybdenum) and
vanadium (acting similarly to chromium) may also be present, but
they too are relatively expensive and we have also found that
vanadium, present in large amounts (i.e. above about 2 percent)
tend to produce carbides which are not as desirable as the
preferred orthorhombic and trigonal types.
Copper may also be used as an alloying element, but it too is
expensive and only appears to exert a relatively slight effect on
our alloy composition. In general, we prefer to limit all of these
special alloying elements commonly found in white cast irons to a
total value of about 2 percent each and certainly to a combined
value of no more than 5 percent.
Total carbon, which is present in all cast irons, is an important
element in the composition of our alloy. We generally prefer a
total carbon content of about 3.30 percent or more, in order to
favor the production of the preferred carbides. In any case, we
find that with carbon contents of less than 3 percent, it is quite
difficult to obtain a reasonable proportion of trigonal carbides in
the structure. Carbon contents above 4 percent tend to produce
massive carbide segregation and the formation of very large
carbides, which detract from the homogeneity of an alloy.
While silicon may be entirely absent from an alloy, we prefer to
have it present in an amount ranging from 0.5 to 2.5 percent. At
silicon levels of between 1.0 and 2.0 percent we find that the
production of the preferred carbides is somewhat easier and that
silicon appears to work together with carbon, so that the amount of
silicon used is usually lower at higher carbon contents. In any
case, the presence or absence of silicon is not critical to the
production of the cast iron of our invention.
The mechanical properties of our alloy are particularly suited to
wear and abrasion resistance. The overall Brinell hardness may be
as low as 300, because of the relatively soft austenitic matrix,
but on the other hand, particularly when thermal treatments are
used, may be as high as 700 Brinell. We find that the as-cast
hardness normally ranges between 320 and 550 Brinell and we prefer
to have an as-cast hardness of about 400 Brinell, where a higher
impact resistance is important.
The tensile strength of our alloy is usually more than 50,000
p.s.i., but may be as high as 100,000 p.s.i. As tensile strength is
not particularly important in white cast irons, we do not regard it
as an index of quality.
The impact strength of our alloy is higher than that associated
with white cast irons and is very similar to that normally
associated with other austenitic, ferritic or martensitic white
irons containing chunky carbides; thus, on a 2 inch diameter bar we
would normally expect an impact strength of 100 to 150 foot pounds
in the product of our invention. This is approximately twice the
value normally obtained in white irons not having the preferred
carbide structure. This high impact strength or toughness provides
good wear resistance under conditions where some pounding is
present and where ordinary white irons would tend to abrade very
rapidly by attrition or flaking of the metal surface.
Because of the relatively stable nature of the structure of our
alloy and presumably because of the oxidation resistance of
chromium, we have found that our wear resisting alloy is
surprisingly resistant to the effects of heat or certain corrosive
media. This enhances the value of this alloy, where the combined
effects of heat and wear or the combined effects of corrosion and
wear must be contended with in industrial applications.
While heat and corrosion resistance are found to be relatively
good, the prime purpose of our alloy is to provide improved wear
and abrasion resistance in castings such as mill liners, grinding
balls, drop balls, grizzly discs, rolls, dipper teeth, pulverizing
hammers and etc.
Many examples of the product of our invention may be given, but one
example clearly indicates the unusual nature and the structural
combination which is normal to this alloy. A heat was melted to the
following composition:
Total Carbon 3.63% Silicon 1.65% Manganese 10.50% Chromium 9.62%
Sulphur 0.08% Phosphorus 0.09%
This heat was cast into a 2 inch diameter test bar and into a
casting used for grinding rock. The structure of the casting was
examined and was found to consist of carbides in a matrix of about
70 percent austenite and 30 percent low temperature pearlite
(non-resolvable pearlite). The carbides were approximately 60
percent of the trigonal (chunky) type and about 40 percent of the
orthorhombic (needle) type.
The test bar was tested for impact at 12 inch centers under a drop
test machine. It broke at 125 foot pounds. The hardness of the
casting was found to be 430 Brinell on an overall basis.
Microhardness measurements on the carbides in the structure
indicated hardness ranging from 800 to 1050 Brinell.
The casting was placed in service and performed for 152 hours,
compared to ordinary white irons usually lasting about 60 hours and
to alloyed white irons containing strategic alloys usually lasting
about 130 hours.
Although this invention has been described in its preferred form
with a certain degree of particularity, it is understood that the
present disclosure of the preferred form has been made only by way
of example and that numerous changes in the details may be resorted
to, without departing from the spirit and the scope of the
invention hereinafter claimed.
* * * * *