U.S. patent number 3,655,299 [Application Number 05/088,790] was granted by the patent office on 1972-04-11 for rotary pump with pressure relief.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Eaton Corporation. Invention is credited to Laverne R. Connelly.
United States Patent |
3,655,299 |
Connelly |
April 11, 1972 |
ROTARY PUMP WITH PRESSURE RELIEF
Abstract
A rotary pump includes a housing, rotors, an inlet chamber, an
outlet chamber and pressure relief means. The pressure relief means
includes a movable wall normally resiliently biased into engagement
with one of said rotors and exposed to fluid pressure at said
outlet chamber. At a predetermined maximum pressure, the fluid
pressure force acting upon the wall will overcome the resilient
bias and move the wall away from said rotors to a degree sufficient
to interconnect said outlet and said inlet chambers in fluid
communication and allow fluid to flow therebetween and thereby
disrupt the pumping action of the rotors. The movable wall pressure
relief contacts only one of the rotors.
Inventors: |
Connelly; Laverne R. (Marshall,
MI) |
Assignee: |
Eaton Corporation (Cleveland,
OH)
|
Family
ID: |
22213492 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/088,790 |
Filed: |
November 12, 1970 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
417/310;
418/132 |
Current CPC
Class: |
F04C
14/265 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
F04B
49/02 (20060101); F04b 049/02 () |
Field of
Search: |
;417/283,310
;418/132 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Croyle; Carlton R.
Assistant Examiner: Sher; Richard J.
Claims
Having thus described my invention, I now claim:
1. A rotary pump comprising:
a housing having a cylindrical cavity therein;
inner and outer rotors with inter-engaging teeth forming pumping
chambers mounted for eccentric rotational motion within said
cavity;
a slidable wall sealing one side of said cavity, said wall being
slidable in an axial direction of said cavity and forming a wall
for said pumping chambers when said wall is within a predetermined
axial distance of said rotors;
resilient biasing means mounted to said housing for resiliently
urging said slidable wall into engagement with only one of said
rotors, said biasing means permitting said slidable wall to move a
distance greater than the predetermined axial distance away from
said rotors when said pump generates a pressure greater than a
predetermined maximum.
2. The rotary pump of claim 1 wherein said resilient biasing means
is a Belleville spring.
3. The rotary pump of claim 2 wherein said Belleville spring has
one radial slot and at least one hole proximate each side of said
slot.
4. The rotary pump of claim 1 wherein said resilient biasing means
is a C-shaped Belleville spring including means permitting gripping
of said Belleville spring and tangentially compression thereof.
5. The rotary pump of claim 1 wherein only the inner rotor is
contacted by said slidable wall.
6. The rotary pump of claim 1 wherein said slidable wall is formed
with a substantially centrally located raised boss so as to contact
the inner rotor only.
7. The rotary pump of claim 1 wherein said inner rotor extends to a
position beyond said outer rotor so as said slidable wall will
contact said inner rotor only.
8. A rotary pump comprising:
a housing having a substantially cylindrical cavity therein;
inner and outer rotors having inter-engaging teeth forming the side
walls of pumping chambers mounted for eccentric rotation within
said cavity;
a slidable wall sealing one end of said cavity, said slidable wall
additionally forming one wall of said pumping chambers when said
slidable wall is within a predetermined distance of said rotors,
said slidable wall being formed so as to contact only one of said
rotors; and
a resilient biasing means mounted in said housing for resiliently
urging said slidable wall in a direction towards said rotors, into
an engagement with said one of said rotors and to within a
predetermined distance of the other of said rotors, said biasing
means allowing said slidable wall to move a distance greater than
the predetermined distance from said rotors when said pump
generates greater than a predetermined maximum pressure.
9. A rotary pump comprising:
a housing having a substantially cylindrical cavity containing
eccentrically rotating inner and outer rotors;
a wall slidable within and sealing one end of said cavity, said
wall interacting with said rotors to form pumping chambers when
said wall is located within a predetermined axial distance of one
of said rotors and in contact with the other of said rotors:
and
biasing means mounted to said housing for locating said wall within
the predetermined axial distance from said one of said rotors and
biasing said wall into engagement with the other of said rotors
provided the pump generated pressure does not exceed a
predetermined maximum pressure.
10. The combination of claim 9 wherein said wall is formed with a
centrally raised boss.
11. The combination of claim 9 wherein the inner rotor is longer
than the outer rotor, thereby exposing a larger area of said wall
to pump generated pressure.
12. The combination of claim 9 wherein said biasing means is a
C-shaped, self-retaining Belleville spring.
Description
BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
1. Field of Invention
The present invention relates to a pressure relief for a rotary
pump, and more particularly, to a pressure relief of the sliding
wall type wherein the resiliently biased, slidable wall is in fluid
communication with the pumping chambers of the pump.
2. Discussion of the Prior Art
It has been necessary to provide rotary pumps of the type having
inner and outer rotors with eccentric axes for rotation, such as
those used in lubrication pumps for internal combustion engines,
with an effective pressure relief valve. For those pumps utilized
as lubrication pumps, the pressure differentials between running
and shut-off pressure is often quite small, 105 p.s.i. running
pressure with 110 p.s.i. shut-off pressure. For those pumps, a very
sensitive pressure relief valve must be provided.
Heretofore, pressure relief valves of the sliding wall type have
been inadequate for pumps wherein sensitivities of the magnitude
mentioned above were required. For this reason, sliding wall valves
with the cost advantage thereof, were usable only in those
applications having a relatively large on-off pressure
differential.
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
The present invention provides a more sensitive sliding wall type
pressure relief than heretofore possible, by providing means
whereby the wall contacts only one of a pair of rotors. By
contacting only one of the rotors an increased surface area of
slidable wall is exposed to the generated pump pressure and thus
the generated fluid force acting on the wall, namely that force
which equals the exposed slidable wall area times pressure, will be
proportionally increased. Thus, for any given pressure a force
signal of greater magnitude is generated, allowing applicant's
pressure relief to be capable of much more sensitive operation than
has heretofor been possible with sliding wall pressure relief
devices.
The biasing force on the wall is sufficient to permit the pump to
generate fluid pressure up to a predetermined, desirable maximum
pressure, at which point the fluid pressure force on the wall will
overcome the bias and said wall will be moved away from the rotors
to the extent that the pumping chambers are put into fluid
communication with each other so that the fluid flows between the
outlet chamber and the inlet chamber thereby disrupting the pumping
action of the rotors beyond the predetermined pressure. As the
fluid pressure drops to an acceptable level, the biasing force will
again urge the movable wall into a position whereby the outlet and
inlet chambers of the pump are again sealed from each other and
normal pumping will resume.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a hydraulic pump, illustrating
certain features of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view taken along the line 2-2 of FIG.
1.
FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of a hydraulic pump illustrating
an alternate embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 4 is a partial, cross-sectional view of an alternate
embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 5 is a plane view of one element of FIG. 4.
FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view of the pump of FIG. 1 in a second
operating condition.
FIG. 6a is a force diagram illustrating the hydraulic forces acting
on a certain portion of the pump of FIG. 1.
FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional view illustrating a prior art
device.
FIG. 7a is a force diagram illustrating the hydraulic forces acting
on a certain portion of the pump of FIG. 7.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION
Referring now more specifically to the drawings and more specially
to FIGS. 1 and 2, a rotary pump may generally be seen at 10. The
pump 10 includes a housing 12 with a fluid inlet 14 and fluid
outlet 15. Housing 12 has a cylindrical cavity 16 defined by
cylindrical wall 18 and wall 20 which is transverse to the axis 22
of said cylindrical cavity 16. As is well-known in the art, ports
communicating with low pressure inlet 14 and high pressure fluid
outlet 15 are formed in the upper wall 20.
Mounted for eccentric rotation within cavity 16 is an outer rotor
30 having teeth 32 inter-engaged with teeth 34 of an inner rotor
36. It will be noted that axis 38 of inner rotor 36 is parallel to
and off-set from axis 22 of outer rotor 30. The parallel but
off-set axis of rotation results in eccentric rotational pumping
action as is well-known in the art when inner rotor 36 is driven
and may be more fully understood by reference to U.S. Pat. No.
2,792,788. Fixedly mounted to inner rotor 36 is a rotary shaft 39
which is provided with splines 42 for attachment to an external
driving means (not shown).
Sealing the opposite end of cavity 16 is a slidable wall 40 which
is movable, under certain conditions, along axis 22 while
maintaining its sealing relation to cylindrical wall 18. Mounted to
housing 12 by a snap ring 42 is a resilient biasing means 44 which
resiliently urges wall 40 in a generally upwards direction in FIG.
1. The present resilient biasing means 44 has the embodiment of a
Belleville spring.
Wall 40 is formed with a raised boss 46 which will contact the
lower end of rotor 36 when said wall is resiliently urged into
upward position. It should be noted that due to raised boss 46, a
lower surface 48 of wall 40 will not in any position contact outer
rotor 30. A clearance 50 is thus formed between surface 48 and the
lower end of outer rotor 30 which clearance is of the magnitude of
0.0005 inch which due to the effect of hydrostatic filling will not
adversely affect the normal pumping action of rotary pump 10.
Reference to FIG. 3 will indicate a modified form of rotary pump
110 wherein a flat slidable wall 140 is utilized with an elongated
inner rotor 136. The effect is identical with that described in the
above paragraph, with a clearance 50' of the magnitude of 0.0005
inch being formed between the outer rotor 130 and slidable wall
140. As the operation of pumps 10 and 110 are identical the
operation of pump 110 will not be described in detail.
FIGS. 4 and 5 illustrate a further modification of the present
invention. In FIGS. 4 and 5 a modified Belleville spring 60 is
provided. Modified Belleville spring 60 has a radial slot 62 and
two small holes 64 adjacent the radial slot. Utilizing a tool, such
as the well-known snap-ring pliers, the holes 64 may be forced
closer together, thus decreasing the outer diameter of spring 60 so
as to permit insertion thereof into the cavity 16 and retention
thereof in the cavity 16 by cooperation of the spring 60 with a
groove 69 in the wall 18. Thus, the modified Belleville spring 60
may be utilized as a self-mounting fastening device to retain the
movable wall 240 in the cavity 16 and to resiliently bias the
movable wall 240 into engagement with the inner rotor 236 thereby
eliminating the need for snap rings or other means of retaining the
resilient biasing means in place.
The operation of pumps 10, 110 and 210 of FIGS. 1, 3 and 5
respectively is identical and therefore will be described in detail
for pump 10 only. In operation, fluid enters pump 10 through inlet
14 from which it is communicated through the inlet port in upper
wall 20 to a pumping chamber 70. Pumping chamber 70 is formed by
teeth 32 and 34 of inner and outer rotors 30 and 36 respectively
together with the upper wall 20 and slidable wall 40. As shaft 39
is rotated in either direction, the chamber 70 is rotated toward
outlet 15 and is reduced in size; and the fluid entrapped therein
is forced under pressure out the high pressure outlet 15. When pump
10 is generating fluid pressures below the predetermined maximum,
biasing means 44 is sufficient to urge slidable wall 40, upward
into contact with inner rotor 36 and maintain clearance 50 at a
magnitude so as not to interfere with the pumping action. As the
generated fluid pressure exceeds a predetermined maximum, the
generated pressure force acting upon surface 48 will overcome
resilient biasing spring 44 and wall 40 will move away from rotors
30 and 36. As is seen in FIG. 6, this will create an enlarged
clearance 50' between wall 40 and outer rotor 30 and a clearance
150 between the inner rotor 36 and the raised boss 46. The
clearances 50' and 150 will allow fluid to flow from chamber to
chamber and effectively destroy the pumping and pressure creating
action of the eccentrically rotating rotors. As the pressure drops
to an acceptable level, the slidable wall 40 will be urged upward
by resilient means 44 towards the rotors, and clearances 50' and
150 will be closed allowing pumping action to resume.
For comparative purposes, FIG. 7 will illustrate a prior art device
310 in which slidable wall 340 contacts both inner rotor 346 and
outer rotor 330. The upper surface of wall 340 has been divided
into surfaces 301, 302, 303, 304 and 305 for illustrative
purposes.
It should be noted, the reaction force generated by the fluid
pressure, of that force which will tend to overcome the bias, is
equal to generated fluid pressure times wall area in contact with
the fluid. It may easily be seen by reference to FIGS. 6a and 7a
that the area of the present invention in contact with fluid
pressure, namely 101 and 103, far exceeds that contact area of the
prior art device, namely 302 and 304. Thus, for any given generated
fluid pressure, the resulting generated reaction force will be
greater in the present invention than in the prior art device. By
increasing the force generated by any given pressure it is possible
to design a pressure relief sensitive to smaller increments of
pressure differentials.
Applicant's novel arrangement of slidable wall 40 and rotors 30 and
36 has the effect of amplifying the pressure relief reaction to any
given pressure differential.
It should also be noted that the clearance 50' required to crack
the pumping chambers and allow fluid to flow between the rotors is
partially formed by the gap 50. Therefore, the movable wall has a
lesser distance to move away from the rotors to effect a pressure
relief and thus has a faster response than the prior art
devices.
By providing a sliding wall type pressure relief that has a larger
reaction to a given pressure than does the prior art devices,
applicant has invented a more sensitive, quicker acting and
therefore more usable device than has been heretofore
available.
* * * * *