U.S. patent number 3,654,540 [Application Number 05/106,675] was granted by the patent office on 1972-04-04 for magnetostrictive drive circuit feedback coil.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Cavitron Corporation. Invention is credited to Jacob Haggag, William M. Honig, Richard H. Paschke.
United States Patent |
3,654,540 |
Honig , et al. |
April 4, 1972 |
MAGNETOSTRICTIVE DRIVE CIRCUIT FEEDBACK COIL
Abstract
A feedback coil is placed in surrounding relation to a
magnetostrictive member which is vibrating under the influence of a
drive coil being energized by a power amplifier. Ideally, the
voltage induced in the feedback coil should be proportional only to
the vibrational amplitude of the magnetostrictive member. The
induced voltage is fed back to the input of the power amplifier
insuring that the member is vibrating at one of its resonant
frequencies. The feedback coil is designed so that there is no
transformer coupling between the feedback and drive coils. The
feedback coil can be positioned along the length of the device in
one of two ways, so as to maximize the induced voltage. Each way
relies on a different magnetostrictive effect.
Inventors: |
Honig; William M. (New York,
NY), Paschke; Richard H. (Medford, NY), Haggag; Jacob
(Howard Beach, NY) |
Assignee: |
Cavitron Corporation (Long
Island City, NY)
|
Family
ID: |
22312669 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/106,675 |
Filed: |
January 15, 1971 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
318/118;
310/26 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B06B
1/0261 (20130101); B06B 2201/58 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B06B
1/02 (20060101); H01v 009/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;318/114,116,118,132,130,128,127 ;310/26,25,13,15,27,8.1 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Duggan; D. F.
Claims
We claim:
1. An electro-mechanical resonant system comprising a work
performing, variably loaded mechanical part including a
magnetostrictive member and having a drive coil in surrounding
relation thereto, a power circuit operative to supply alternating
current to said drive coil so that the latter establishes an
alternating electromagnetic field which sets up compressional waves
in said magnetostrictive member at a resonant frequency of said
mechanical part, a pickup coil in surrounding relation to the
magnetostrictive member so that a voltage is induced in said pickup
coil directly related to the actual frequency of the compressional
waves, said pickup coil having two portions each with an equal
number of winding, with the first portion being wound in a
clockwise direction about the magnetostrictive member and the
second portion being wound in a counterclockwise direction about
the magnetostrictive member, and a circuit means connecting said
pickup coil to said power circuit so that the power supplied to
said drive coil is controlled by said alternating feedback
voltage.
2. A pickup coil for use with a magnetostrictive member being
vibrated by a drive coil energized by a power circuit, wherein said
pickup coil is in surrounding relation to the magnetostrictive
member whereby a voltage is induced in said pickup coil directly
related to the actual frequency of vibration of the
magnetostrictive member, said pickup coil includes two portions,
each with an equal number of windings, with the first portion being
wound in a clockwise direction about the magnetostrictive member
and the second portion being wound in a counterclockwise direction
about the magnetostrictive member, and a circuit means connects
said pickup coil to the power circuit so that the power supplied to
the drive coil is controlled by the induced feedback voltage.
3. An electro-mechanical resonant system comprising a work
performing, variably loading mechanical part including a
magnetostrictive member having a longitudinal axis and having a
drive coil in surrounding relation thereto, a power circuit
operative to supply alternating current to said drive coil so that
the latter establishes an alternating electromagnetic field which
sets up longitudinal compressional waves in said magnetostrictive
member at a resonant frequency of said mechanical part, a pickup
coil in surrounding relation to the magnetostrictive member so that
a voltage is induced in said pickup coil directly related to the
actual frequency of the compressional waves, said pickup coil
having two portions, each with an equal number of windings, with
the first portion being wound in a clockwise direction about the
magnetostrictive member, the second portion being wound in a
counterclockwise direction about the magnetostrictive member and
the reversal point positioned at a node of longitudinal motion, and
a circuit means connecting said pickup coil to said power circuit
so that the power supplied to said drive coil is controlled by said
alternating feedback voltage.
4. A pickup coil for use with a magnetostrictive member having a
longitudinal axis and being vibrated by a drive coil energized by a
power circuit, wherein said pickup coil is in surrounding relation
to the magnetostrictive member whereby a voltage is induced in said
pickup coil directly related to the actual frequency of vibration
of the magnetostrictive member, said pickup coil includes two
portions, each with an equal number of windings, with the first
portion being wound in a clockwise direction about the
magnetostrictive member, the second portion being wound in a
counterclockwise direction about the magnetostrictive member and
the reversal point being positioned at a node of longitudinal
motion, and a circuit means connects said pickup coil to the power
circuit so that the power supplied to the drive coil is controlled
by the induced feedback voltage.
5. An electro-mechanical resonant system comprising a work
performing, variably loaded mechanical part including a polarized
magnetostrictive member having a longitudinal axis and having a
drive coil in surrounding relation thereto, a power circuit
operative to supply alternating current to said drive coil so that
the latter establishes an alternating electromagnetic field which
sets up longitudinal compressional waves in said magnetostrictive
member at a resonant frequency of said mechanical part, a pickup
coil in surrounding relation to the magnetostrictive member so that
a voltage is induced in said pickup coil directly related to the
actual frequency of the compressional waves, said pickup coil
having two portions, each with an equal number of windings, with
the first portion being wound in a clockwise direction about the
magnetostrictive member, the second portion being wound in a
counterclockwise direction about the magnetostrictive member and a
node of longitudinal motion of said member approximately at the
center of one of the portions of the pickup coil, and a circuit
means connecting said pickup coil to said power circuit so that the
power supplied to said drive coil is controlled by said alternating
feedback voltage.
6. A pickup coil for use with a polarized magnetostrictive member
having a longitudinal axis and being vibrated by a drive coil
energized by a power circuit, wherein said pickup coil is in
surrounding relation to the magnetostrictive member whereby a
voltage is induced in said pickup coil directly related to the
actual frequency of vibration of the magnetostrictive member, said
pickup coil includes two portions, each with an equal number of
windings, with the first portion being wound in a clockwise
direction about the magnetostrictive member, the second portion
being wound in a counterclockwise direction about the
magnetostrictive member and a node of longitudinal motion of said
member approximately at the center of one of the portions of the
pickup coil, and a circuit means connects said pickup coil to the
power circuit so that the power supplied to the drive coil is
controlled by the induced feedback voltage.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to electro-mechanical resonant
systems, and more particularly is directed to improvements in the
design of a feedback coil which is in surrounding relation to a
magnetostrictive member which is vibrating under the influence of a
drive coil being energized by a power amplifier. The feedback coil
is used to insure that the magnetostrictive member vibrates at the
resonant frequency at which it is designed to operate. The
important features of the design include the manner in which the
feedback coil is actually wound to eliminate any transformer
coupling between the feedback and power coils, and the positioning
of the feedback coil along the length of the magnetostrictive
member to maximize the sensitivity of the voltage induced in the
feedback coil. There are two different possible positions depending
upon which magnetostrictive effect is the most important.
In general, electro-mechanical resonant systems are driven into
acoustic vibration by means of a drive coil which is energized by
an electrical AC power from an oscillation generator. This AC power
produces a magnetic field in the region of the coil in which is
placed a magnetostrictive member. Compressional or standing waves
are set up in the magnetostrictive member causing it and other
parts connected thereto to vibrate. Usually a tool is connected to
the magnetostrictive member by way of a tool holder whereby the
high frequency longitudinal vibrations set up in the tool may be
employed in performing ultrasonic machining, forming, welding,
cleaning or other operations. The maximum amplitude of vibration at
the working end of the tool is obtained when the frequency of the
electrical power applied to the drive coil is equal to one of the
resonant frequencies of the combined magnetostrictive member, tool
holder and tool. The desired resonant frequency can change due to
various factors such as the use of different tools, tool wear and
variations in temperature and loading. In order for such a system
to be useful and practical, the frequency applied to the drive coil
should be capable of being varied so as to maintain the appropriate
drive frequency.
It has previously been proposed to effect the necessary adjustment
of the frequency either manually by an operator or automatically
under the control of a feedback signal varying with the impedance
of the magnetostrictive member, as in U.S. Pat. No. 2,872,578
issued Feb. 3, 1959 to Kaplan and Turner and assigned to the
assignee of this application. Also a feedback signal may be
obtained from a pickup device such as a piezo-electric crystal or a
resonant pin which is coupled to the mechanically vibrating part of
the resonant system as in U.S. Pat. No. 3,304,479 issued Feb. 14,
1967 to C. Kleesattel et al. and assigned to the assignee of this
application and U.S. Pat. No. 3,419,776 issued Dec. 31, 1968 to C.
Kleesattel et al. and assigned to the assignee of this application.
In such existing systems the frequency of the oscillation generator
is modified by the feedback signal. However such generators usually
are of a complex construction and require a number of amplification
stages.
Another more desirable approach of the automatic frequency control
type is to use a feedback coil in surrounding relation to the
magnetostrictive member to act as a sensor. The voltage induced in
said feedback coil is then used to control the frequency of the
power amplifier which is used to energize the drive coil. This
approach is usually referred to as a feedback stablized
oscillator.
One of the problems in using feedback coils is that some of the
power applied to the drive coil is coupled directly to the feedback
coil by pure magnetic coupling, hereinafter to be called the
transformer coupling effect. This means that the feedback signal is
influenced in part by power that has not acoustically acted upon
the magnetostrictive member. Therefore the transformer coupling
effect should be minimized or eliminated as much as possible.
One way to solve the transformer coupling effect problem is to
magnetically shield the two coils by some type of physical barrier.
The disadvantage of such an approach is that it increases the
overall bulk of the completed device and the effect and/or
sensitivity of at least one of the coils is diminished.
Another way to solve the transformer coupling effect problem is to
wind the drive coil about one portion of the magnetostrictive
member and the feedback coil about the remaining portion of the
member with some type of shielding mechanism therebetween. An
example of such a shielding mechanism is to have the drive coil to
include a few reverse windings positioned over the feedback coil or
between the feedback and drive coils, cancelling any type of
transformer effect between the two coils. Such a design is
disclosed and claimed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,151,284 issued Sept. 29,
1964 to C. Kleesattel and assigned to the assignee of this
application. The problem with such designs is that shielding occurs
at only one frequency setting of the drive power and incomplete
shielding will occur at drive powers both higher and lower than
this. In addition, since only a portion of the magnetostrictive
member is surrounded by a drive coil, the maximum number of ampere
turns cannot be used to drive the magnetostrictive member.
All electro-mechanical resonant systems have a tendency to vibrate
at various spurious frequencies other than the frequency at which
it is designed to operate. Another advantage of the feedback coil
of this invention is that it helps to maintain oscillations at the
correct frequency by preventing oscillations at many of these
spurious frequencies. In particular, due to the way in which each
half of the feedback coil is wound relative to the other half,
those spurious frequency modes which induce essentially equal and
opposite voltages in each half of the feedback coil will be
eliminated for the most part.
Therefore, the principal object of this invention is to provide a
new and improved feedback coil for use with an electro-mechanical
resonant system to insure that the mechanically vibrating part of
said system continues to vibrate at one of its natural resonant
frequencies.
Another object of this invention is to provide a new and improved
feedback coil for use with an electro-mechanical resonant system
which is designed so that there is no transformer effect between
said feedback coil and the drive coil of the system.
A still further object of this invention is to provide a new and
improved feedback coil for use with an electro-mechanical resonant
system, said coil being designed to minimize any transformer effect
with the drive coil and said coil being positioned so as to
maximize the voltage induced therein.
An even further object of this invention is to provide a new and
improved feedback coil for use with an electro-mechanical resonant
system for eliminating many of the spurious frequency modes at
which said system may have a tendency to vibrate.
In accordance with the objects of this invention, the drive coil is
in surrounding relation to the entire length of the
magnetostrictive member and the feedback coil is in surrounding
relation to a portion of or to the entire length of the member.
However, half of the windings of the feedback coil are wound in one
direction (such as clockwise) and the other half of the windings of
the feedback coil are wound in the reverse direction, (such as
counterclockwise), with the transition region to be hereinafter
referred to as the reversal point. This results in the net voltage
in the feedback coil due to the transformer effect between the
feedback and drive coils being zero, since any such induced voltage
is equal in magnitude but opposite in direction in the two halves
of the feedback coil. However, there are two other effects that
could give rise to an induced voltage in the feedback coil.
One such effect is the motional velocity effect. Since the
magnetostrictive member is being vibrated by a drive coil, it may
be considered the equivalent of a moving magnet which gives rise to
an induced voltage in any surrounding coil. To obtain the maximum
benefit to this effect, the feedback coil should be positioned so
that its reversal point is at the node of longitudinal motion of
the member, such that when half of the turns of the feedback coil
sense a voltage due to motion in one direction, the other half of
the turns sense a voltage due to motion in the other motion. Since
the two halves are wound in opposite direction, relative to each
other, the induced voltage reinforce each other.
Another effect resulting in an induced voltage in the feedback coil
is that as the magnetostrictive member is vibrated, there is a
changing stress pattern along the length of member resulting in a
changing permeability of the magnetostrictive member, along its
length. This changing permeability in the presence of a DC magnetic
field, which is often used to bias a magnetostrictive member,
results in an induced voltage in the feedback coil, hereinafter to
be called the permeability effect. The maximum rate of change of
permeability occurs in the vicinity of the node of longitudinal
motion of the magnetostrictive member and is symmetrical
thereabout. To maximize the sensitivity of the feedback coil to the
permeability effect, the coil should be displaced from the node a
certain distance, such that that portion of the member experiencing
the maximum rate of change of permeability should be surrounded by
one half of the feedback coil. In such a position, the motional
velocity effect still induces some voltage but a portion thereof is
cancelled out since the reversal point of the feedback coil is not
at the node of longitudinal motion. However, this configuration is
most advantageous whenever the permeability effect is the most
significant.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
For a more thorough understanding of the invention, reference may
be made to the following description of an exemplary embodiment,
taken in conjunction with the fingers of the accompanying drawings,
in which:
FIG. 1 is a circuit diagram illustrating an electro-mechanical
resonant system embodying the present invention wherein the two
coils have been removed from the magnetostrictive member for ease
of explanation;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a portion of FIG. 1 illustrating
the position of the feedback coil relative to the node of
longitudinal motion of the magnetostrictive member in one
embodiment of the invention; and
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a portion of FIG. 1 illustrating
the portion of the feedback coil relative to the node of
longitudinal motion of the magnetostrictive member in another
embodiment of the invention.
DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS
Referring to FIG. 1, it will be seen that an electro-mechanical
resonant system embodying the invention may include a mechanical
portion made up in part by a magnetostrictive member 10. The
magnetostrictive member 10 may either be made from any
ferromagnetic, magnetic or ferrite material having a high tensile
strength and highly magnetostrictive in character, such as
permanickel, nickel or permendur. A drive coil 15 which is
energized by alternating current from a power circuit (to be
discussed in more detail below) establish an alternating
electromagnetic field setting up compressional waves in the
magnetostrictive member 10 causing it to vibrate. In actuality, the
coil 15 is wound around the magnetostrictive member 10, but for
ease in explanation it is shown removed therefrom in FIG. 1. The
vibration of the magnetostrictive member is sinusoidal such that
the amplitude of vibration varies in magnitude along the length of
the member in a sinusoidal fashion. Points at which there is no
amplitude are referred to as nodes of longitudinal motion and
points at which the amplitude is a maximum for any particular
frequency are referred to as antinodes of longitudinal motion. A DC
bias supply 20 is coupled to the drive coil 15 via an inductor 22
for polarizing the magnetostrictive member 10. The inductor 22 is
used to prevent the AC power which is energizing the drive coil 15,
from flowing into the DC bias supply 20.
A feedback coil 25 is wound around the magnetostrictive member 10,
but for ease in explanation it is shown removed therefrom in FIG.
1. The feedback coil 25 develops a voltage proportional to the
vibration of the magnetostrictive member because of two different
effects, to be described in more detail hereinafter. The output of
the feedback coil is delivered to a phasing circuit 30, then to a
pre-amplifier 35 where the signal is amplified and then to the
power amplifier 40, the latter two components comprising the power
circuit. This signal controls the frequency of the output of the
power amplifier 40 which is then applied to the drive coil 15 via a
capacitor 42 to insure that the magnetostrictive member vibrates at
one of its resonant frequencies. The capacitor 42 is used to
prevent the DC power from the DC bias supply 20 from flowing into
the power amplifier 40. The power circuit comprising the
preamplifier 35 and the power amplifier 40, is energized by the
power supply 45. The purpose of the phasing circuit 30 is to
compensate for phase shifts in the pre-amplifier 35 and power
amplifier 40 and for phase shifts between the drive coil 15, the
magnetostrictive member 10 and the feedback coil 25.
While the drive coil 15 is wound in one direction, the feedback
coil 25 may be considered to have two portions 25a and 25b. There
are the same number of windings in each portion 25a and 25b.
However each portion is wound in an opposite direction, that is,
one portion is wound in a clockwise manner and the other portion is
wound in a counterclockwise manner with a reversal point 25c
somewhere in the transition region between the two portions. Due to
this oppositely wound feature, any induced voltage caused by the
magnetic field of the drive coil 15, (the transformer effect) is
cancelled out within the feedback coil 25.
Referring to FIG. 2 a magnetostrictive member 10a having a
longitudinal axis 11a is shown having a feedback coil 25 of the
nature described above in surrounding relation thereto. The
magnetostrictive member 10a is under the influence of a drive coil
(not shown) of the nature described with respect to FIG. 1. The
magnetostrictive member 10a is vibrated such that there is a node
of longitudinal motion somewhere along its length, designated as
the NODE on FIG. 2. The feedback coil 25 is positioned along the
length of the magnetostrictive member 10a, such that the reversal
point 25c between the portions 25a and 25b occurs at the NODE. FIG.
2 includes a graph showing the sinusoidal nature of the amplitude
of vibration of a resonating member. Even though the direction of
vibration of the magnetostrictive member 10a is in opposite
directions adjacent to each of the portions 25a and 25b of the
feedback coil 25, since each portion is oppositely wound relative
to the other portion, the induced voltages in each portion of the
feedback coil 25 reinforce each other. This induced voltage is
caused by the motion of the magnetostrictive member 10a which is
magnetized due to the current in the drive coil (the motional
velocity effect).
Referring to FIG. 3, a magnetostrictive member 10b having a
longitudinal axis 11b is shown to have a feedback coil 25 of the
nature described above in surrounding relation thereto. The
magnetostrictive member 10b is under the influence of a drive coil
(not shown) of the nature described with respect to FIG. 1. The
magnetostrictive member 10b is vibrated such that there is a node
of longitudinal motion somewhere along its length, designated as
NODE' on FIG. 3. FIG. 3 includes a graph showing the change in
permeability (.DELTA..mu.) of the magnetostrictive member 10b as it
is subjected to the varying current of the drive coil (not shown)
versus the length of the member 10b. Since the maximum changes in
permeability occur on both sides of the NODE' and since a voltage
is induced in the feedback coil directly proportional to the amount
of change in permeability (.DELTA..mu.) (the permeability effect),
the feedback coil 25 is positioned so that the NODE' is
approximately near the center of one portion 25b of the feedback
coil 25. It is true that the voltage induced in the other portion
25a of the feedback coil 25, due to this permeability effect, will
be in the opposite direction. However, as can be seen from the
graph in FIG. 3, the change in permeability declines rapidly at
points removed from the NODE', hence the subtraction of the induced
voltage in portion 25a from the induced voltage in portion 25b will
be very slight.
Finally, it is recognized that usually both the motional velocity
effect and the permeability effect occur simultaneously when a
magnetostrictive member vibrates in the presence of a DC magnetic
field. Therefore the choice of whether to position the feedback
coil in accordance with the embodiment of FIG. 2 or in accordance
with the embodiment of FIG. 3 depends upon which effect is
preponderant.
The above-described embodiments of the invention is intended to be
merely exemplary, and those skilled in the art will be able to make
numerous variations and modifications of it without departing from
the spirit and scope of the invention. All such variations and
modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the
invention as defined in the appended claims.
* * * * *