U.S. patent number 3,653,353 [Application Number 05/074,773] was granted by the patent office on 1972-04-04 for attachment point.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Hood Sailmakers, Inc.. Invention is credited to Harry T. Davis.
United States Patent |
3,653,353 |
Davis |
April 4, 1972 |
ATTACHMENT POINT
Abstract
The attachment point disclosed herein is adapted for applying a
substantial load to a fabric sheet. A particularly fitting example
of an application for such an attachment point is at the clew of a
sail such as a Genoa jib where, in a large sailboat, the jib sheet
(a rope) may be holding the sail in position under a load of
several hundreds to several thousands of pounds. The attachment
point employs a pair of complementary ring members, each having a
multiplicity of needle-like teeth. These ring members are clamped
on opposite sides of a plurality of cloth layers by means of a
metallic inner liner which is rimmed down over the ring members so
as to apply a clamping force sufficient to prevent combing of the
teeth through the cloth layers under a lateral pressure in the same
order of magnitude as the strength of the cloth layers
themselves.
Inventors: |
Davis; Harry T. (West Peabody,
MA) |
Assignee: |
Hood Sailmakers, Inc.
(Marblehead, MA)
|
Family
ID: |
22121606 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/074,773 |
Filed: |
September 23, 1970 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
114/115;
24/713.7 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B63H
9/067 (20200201); Y10T 24/3745 (20150115) |
Current International
Class: |
B63H
9/06 (20060101); B63H 9/00 (20060101); B63h
009/08 () |
Field of
Search: |
;114/114,115
;24/141,202 |
Foreign Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Blix; Trygve M.
Claims
I claim:
1. In a sail, an attachment point for applying and distributing a
substantial local load to the sail, said attachment point
comprising:
a plurality of cloth layers sewn to the sail for distributing said
load, said layers being apertured at the desired point of
attachment;
a pair of complementary ring members investment cast of stainless
steel, each of which has on one side a substantially flat face and
on the other side a substantially toroidally rounded surface, each
ring member including also a multiplicity of integral needle-like
teeth of round cross section upstanding from the respective flat
face, said teeth being adapted to pierce the weave of said cloth
layers without substantial disruption thereof;
a stainless steel, generally tubular liner extending through one of
said ring members, the aperture in said cloth layers and the other
of said ring members, said liner being rimmed substantially
symmetrically over the rounded surfaces of both of said ring
members thereby to clamp said multiple cloth layers between said
rings under sufficient force to substantially prevent combing of
said teeth through the cloth under a lateral pressure in the same
order of magnitude as the strength of said cloth layers.
2. An attachment point as set forth in claim 1 wherein said liner
is rimmed over under a force in the order of 30 tons.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to an attachment point or grommet, and more
particularly, to such an attachment point which is suitable for
applying and distributing rather large local loads to a fabric
sheet.
In conventional sailmaking procedures, attachment points for heavy
loads, e.g., at the clew of a Genoa jib, were provided by hand
sewing in a metal or rope ring, together with strips of rope and
leather which were employed to distribute the load from the ring
along the edges of the sail away from the clew. In sails where a
particularly heavy load was to be applied, wire rope might also be
used and the load from a principle ring might be applied through
two or more intermediate rings so as to facilitate the initial
distribution of the concentrated local forces. As the construction
of such conventional attachment points is typically performed by
hand, the attachment points represented a substantial item of cost
in the sail manufacturing operation.
Among the several objects of the present invention may be noted the
provision of a normal attachment point for applying and
distributing a substantial local load to a fabric sheet; the
provision of such an attachment point which does not require a
large amount of hand work; the provision of such an attachment
point providing improved load handling capability; the provision of
such an attachment point which is relatively lightweight; the
provision of such an attachment point which is relatively simple
and inexpensive in construction and which is reliable in use. Other
objects and features will be in part apparent and in part pointed
out hereinafter.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
As noted previously, the attachment point of the present invention
is adapted for applying and distributing a substantial or
concentrated local load to a fabric sheet such as a sail. A
plurality of cloth layers are fastened to the fabric sheet for
distributing the load, the several layers being apertured at the
desired point of attachment. A pair of complementary ring members
are provided, each of which has on one side a substantially flat
face and, on the other side, a toroidally rounded surface. Each
ring member also includes a multiplicity of integral needle-like
teeth upstanding from the respective flat face. The transverse
dimensions of the teeth are substantially the same in different
directions and are scaled to permit the teeth to pierce the weave
of the cloth layers without substantial disruption thereof. An
inner liner extends through the rings and the aperture in the cloth
layers, the liner being rimmed, substantially symmetrically, over
the rounded surfaces of both ring members, thereby to clamp the
multiple cloth layers between the rings under sufficient force to
prevent combing of the teeth through the cloth under lateral
pressures of the same order of magnitude as the strength of the
cloth layers themselves.
A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a side view of the clew of a Genoa jib provided with an
attachment point constructed in accordance with the present
invention;
FIG. 2 is a sectional view taken substantially on the line 2--2 of
FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a plan view of one of a pair of ring members employed in
the attachment point of FIG. 1;
FIG. 4 is a sectional view taken on the line 4--4 of FIG. 3;
FIG. 5 is a plan view of the other of the ring members employed in
the FIG. 1 attachment point;
FIGS. 6-9 illustrate seccessive steps in the method of forming the
attachment point of FIG. 1;
FIG. 10 is a plan view of a ring member employed in a somewhat
different embodiment of the attachment point of this invention;
FIG. 11 is a sectional view taken substantially on the line 11--11
of FIG. 10;
FIG. 12 is a plan view of another ring member employed in a
relatively small embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 13 is a sectional view taken substantially on the line 13--13
of FIG 12; and
FIG. 14 is a graph representing the strength of the different
embodiments for various numbers of fabric layers.
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts
throughout the several views of the drawings.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Referring now to FIGS. 1 and 2, there is indicated at 11 generally
the clew of a Genoa jib. While the main portion of the jib itself
will typically comprise only one or two layers of the sailcloth,
depending upon the particular cut used and the size of the jib, the
thickness of the sail is built up toward the clew corner by
successively adding layers of sailcloth on one or both sides of the
main fabric sheet. These several layers are continued for different
distances into the body of the sail for distributing the load and
are sewn thereto as indicated at 13 - 17.
Close to the corner of the clew, the several fabric layers are
apertured and a metal attachment point is applied as may be best
seen in FIG. 2. A jib sheet (rope) is indicated at 19 and is tied
to the jib at the attachment point. A shackle might also be used.
The attachment point itself employs a pair of complementary ring
members 21 and 23 which are clamped on opposite sides of the cloth
layers by means of an inner, generally tubular liner 25 which
extends through the rings and the aperture in the cloth layers. One
side of each ring member is substantially flat and includes a
multiplicity of integral needle-like teeth 27 which are driven into
the cloth layers. The other side of each ring is rounded, i.e.
generally in the form of a toroidal surface. The liner 25 is rimmed
substantially symmetrically over the rounded surfaces of both the
ring members, thereby to clamp the multiple cloth layers between
the ring as is pointed out in greater detail hereinafter.
Sufficient force is applied in rimming over the liner member so
that the residual clamping force left on the rings is sufficient to
prevent combing of the teeth through the cloth, even when a load
approaching the strength of the cloth layers themselves is applied
through the completed attachment point.
The ring 21 is illustrated in greater detail in FIGS. 3 and 4,
while the ring 23 is illustrated in FIG. 5. Each ring includes
three circumferential rows of teeth. The teeth in successive
radially spaced rows are offset so as to substantially reduce the
chance of teeth in the successive rows from falling into alignment
with the weave of the cloth layers. It may be seen, by comparing
FIGS. 3 and 5, that the pins in the ring 21 form a sort of
right-hand spiral when viewing the flat face while the teeth on the
ring 23 form a left-hand spiral when similarly viewed. Accordingly,
it may be seen that the spirals will effectively interleave when
the two rings are clamped on opposite sides of the plural cloth
layers.
Preferably, the teeth 25 are cast integrally with the rings 21 and
23, using conventional investment casting procedures. The preferred
material is 316 stainless steel. After casting, the rings are then
electro-polished to provide a bright finish and to further reduce
the possibility of corrosion.
As may be seen from FIG. 4, the teeth 27 are generally needle-like
in character so that they can pierce the weave of the various cloth
layers without substantial disruption thereof. In other words, the
transverse dimensions of the teeth are substantially the same in
different directions at any given level or height. While a circular
cross section is preferred, this shape is not necessary as long as
the transverse dimensions are sufficiently equal so that the teeth
are not flat or blade-like. As will be understood, a flat or
blade-like shape would tend to disrupt or cut the weave, disturbing
its integral nature.
While the side of the ring member carrying the piece 27 is
generally flat, it has been found desirable to round the corner at
the outside of the ring so as to prevent cutting of the cloth
layers by the outer edges of the rings. Similarly, while the outer
surfaces are generally of a toroidally rounded shape, a slight
shoulder may be provided as indicated at 33 to facilitate locking
of the rimmed-over portion of the liner 25.
The method of applying this attachment point is illustrated in
FIGS. 6 through 9. The plural cloth layers are first die-cut to
provide a circular aperture 35 in the several cloth layers as
illustrated in FIG. 6. A tubular sleeve 37 (which later becomes the
liner 25) is inserted through the aperture (FIG. 7) and the rings
21 and 23, centered on the sleeve, are pressed against the cloth
layers on opposite sides thereof so as to drive the teeth 27 into
the weave of the cloth layers. As a further precaution against
rusting, the toothed sides of the rings 21 and 23 may be sprayed
with an acrylic spray coating prior to being pressed into the cloth
layers. The sleeve 37 is preferably also constructed of
electropolished 316 stainless steel and is annealed so as to permit
working during the subsequent rimming operation.
After the rings have been positioned, the sleeve 35 is then rimmed
over, substantially symmetrically, by a pair of dies 38 and 39 as
illustrated in FIG. 8. The ends of the sleeve are preferably
slightly beveled to facilitate initial entry of the dies. A final
closing or rimming is preferably provided by a separate set of dies
at 41 and 42 as illustrated in FIG. 9. As noted previously,
relatively heavy pressures are provided during the rimming
operation so that the residual clamping force on the ring members
21 and 23 is sufficient to prevent combing of the teeth through the
cloth layers under lateral forces which are in the same order of
magnitude as the ultimate strength of the cloth layers
themselves.
In one particular construction of the embodiment illustrated in
FIGS. 2 - 9, the outer diameter of the rings 21 and 23 was 2.688
inches and the inside diameter was 1.688 inches; the outer diameter
of the sleeve 35 which became the liner was 1.625 inches and its
wall thickness was 0.125 inches; the dies 38 and 39 and the dies 41
and 42 were applied with a force which reached a peak pressure of
30 tons. The residual clamping pressure, though not subject to
exact measurement, was then sufficient to prevent combing of the
teeth 27 through the weave of the cloth during tests to
failure.
In general, it is believed that the teeth provide interlocking of
the rings with the woven fabric and that the relatively high
clamping pressure so compresses the mass of fibers that combing of
the teeth through the weave is substantially prevented. The mode of
ultimate failure is then such that, around most of the
circumference of the aperture, pieces of woven cloth are torn
intact from the several layers. In a small downstream area, some of
the cloth may be entirely removed from between the rings, but
typically the teeth are bent over rather than being combed through
the cloth. With 12 layers of 8 oz. cloth, attachment points
constructed as just described will typically withstand an applied
force of well over 6,000 pounds. While this may not be fully equal
to the ultimate strength of a strap of individual cloth layers of
width equal to the diameter of the aperture, it is generally within
an order of magnitude. It can thus be seen that a very strong
attachment point is provided. Accordingly, this attachment point is
suited for use in situations where a substantial local load has to
be applied to a large fabric sheet. For example, such an attachment
point may be used at the clew of a Genoa jib suited for a
relatively large sailing craft, e.g. the 12 meter yachts raced in
international competition.
While it is difficult to designate a corresponding conventional
construction for comparison, it may in general be noted that this
embodiment will typically provide greater strength with about half
the weight than the most directly comparable conventional
construction.
The ring employed in another embodiment is illustrated in FIGS. 10
and 11. This ring, designated 51, employs two rows of teeth 53,
which, though generally conical in nature, are still essentially
needle-like. The teeth are arranged in two rows with the teeth
being staggered between the two rows. Since only two rows are
employed, the rings used on both sides of the cloth layers may be
of the same construction, and it is not necessary to provide both
left-hand and right-hand members of differing construction. This
arrangement is generally suitable for intermediate loads. Further,
with the use of a relative thin liner member, the over-all
thickness of the attachment point may be kept small enough so that
essentially conventional hooks and snap fixtures may be used
herewith.
FIGS. 12 and 13 illustrate the ring used in a still smaller version
of the attachment point. In this version, only a single row of
teeth 57 are used, the ring 55 being correspondingly narrower so
that a very light and easily managed attachment point is
provided.
FIG. 14 is a graph representing the variation in strength with the
number of layers of cloth for the several illustrated embodiments
of the invention. In each of these embodiments, the cloth layers
are woven dacron 8 oz. sailcloth having a strength of about 300-400
pounds per inch. As there will understandably be some statistical
variation from sample to sample, the performance of the various
embodiments has not been designated as a single line but rather by
a corresponding area, the area being intended to include
approximately 90 percent of the statistical population of test
samples.
The shaded area designated A represents the general range of
strength provided by the larger size attachment point of FIGS. 2
through 9 with different numbers of cloth layers. Similarly, the
shaded area designated B represents the behavior of the embodiment
illustrated in FIGS. 10 and 11, while the area designated C
correspondingly represents the embodiment of FIGS. 12 and 13. In
the first two, the liner sleeve used had an initial wall thickness
of 0.125 inches and forces of approximately 30 tons were applied
during rimming of the sleeve. In the third (FIG. 13), a thinner
liner was used having an initial wall thickness of 0.065 inches and
the rimming force was held to 20 tons to prevent cutting of the
fabric. The thinner liner may also be used with the intermediate
size rings since, as noted previously, it may be desirable in some
situations to use a thinner liner so as to provide an attachment
point which is useable with relatively small hooks and snap
fasteners. With the intermediate rings, the thinner liner, that is,
one having an initial wall thickness of 0.065 inches, may be used
without significantly weakening the strength of the attachment
point.
In view of the foregoing, it may be seen that several objects of
the present invention are achieved and other advantageous results
have been attained.
As various changes could be made in the above construction and
methods without departing from the scope of the invention, it
should be understood that all matter contained in the above
description or shown in the accompanying drawings shall be
interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
* * * * *