U.S. patent number 3,653,055 [Application Number 05/063,977] was granted by the patent office on 1972-03-28 for microwave horn-paraboloidal antenna.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Northern Electric Company Limited. Invention is credited to John Andrew Roth, Allison Eugene Shankowski, Chuang-jy Wu.
United States Patent |
3,653,055 |
Wu , et al. |
March 28, 1972 |
MICROWAVE HORN-PARABOLOIDAL ANTENNA
Abstract
A horn-paraboloidal antenna in which a discontinuity is
introduced into the feed horn so as to excite higher-order modes
from the dominant mode. The various modes are phased in order to
radiate a main lobe and side lobes from the horn. The latter lobes
reflect from the paraboloid out-of-phase with the main lobe so as
to produce a far field radiation pattern having a more uniform
signal strength for a given beam angle.
Inventors: |
Wu; Chuang-jy (Ottawa, Ontario,
CA), Roth; John Andrew (Ottawa, Ontario,
CA), Shankowski; Allison Eugene (Ottawa, Ontario,
CA) |
Assignee: |
Northern Electric Company
Limited (Montreal, Quebec, CA)
|
Family
ID: |
25666517 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/063,977 |
Filed: |
August 12, 1970 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
343/781R;
343/786; 343/840 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H01Q
19/13 (20130101); H01Q 13/025 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H01Q
19/10 (20060101); H01Q 19/13 (20060101); H01Q
13/02 (20060101); H01Q 13/00 (20060101); H01q
019/24 () |
Field of
Search: |
;343/778,779,786,781,840 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Lieberman; Eli
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A microwave antenna comprising:
a paraboloidal metallic reflector for illumination by a main lobe
and a primary set of side lobes at its center and edge portions
respectively;
a metallic feed horn disposed at the focal point of the reflector
and having a throat section and a mouth aperture;
the throat section including a waveguide feed section which
propagates the dominant mode and is beyond cutoff for high-order
modes;
a discontinuity in the feed horn between the throat section and the
mouth aperture for excitation of a higher-order mode; and
a differential phasing section in the feed horn between the
discontinuity and the mouth aperture for reversing the phase of
said higher-order mode with respect to said dominant mode;
radiated signals resulting from the propagation of said modes
produce the main lobe, and the primary set of side lobes which
radiate from the reflector out-of-phase with the main lobe.
2. A microwave antenna comprising:
a paraboloidal metallic reflector for illumination by a main lobe
and a primary set of side lobes at its center and edge portions
respectively;
a metallic pyramidal feed horn disposed at the focal point of the
reflector and having a throat section and a mouth aperture;
a throat section including a rectangular waveguide feed section
which propagates TE.sub.10 waves and is beyond cutoff for
higher-order waves;
an H-plane step in the feed horn between the throat section and the
mouth aperture for excitation of TE.sub.30 waves from the TE.sub.10
waves; and
a differential phasing section in the feed horn between the H-plane
step and the mouth aperture for reversing the phase of the
TE.sub.30 waves with respect to the TE.sub.10 waves;
radiated signals resulting from the propagation of said modes
produce the main lobe, and the primary set of side lobes which
radiate from the reflector out-of-phase with the main lobe.
3. A microwave antenna for first and second electromagnetic waves
of orthogonal polarization;
the antenna comprising:
a paraboloidal metallic reflector for illumination by a main lobe
and a primary set of side lobes at its center and edge portions
respectively;
a metallic pyramidal feed horn disposed at the focal point of the
reflector and having a throat section and a mouth aperture;
the throat section including a rectangular waveguide feed section
which propagates the TE.sub.10 mode and is beyond cutoff for
higher-order modes of both the first and second electromagnetic
waves;
an H-plane step in the feed horn between the throat section and the
mouth aperture for excitation of the TE.sub.30 mode from the
TE.sub.10 mode of the first electromagnetic waves; and
a differential phasing section in the feed horn between the H-plane
step and the mouth aperture for reversing the phase of the
TE.sub.30 mode with respect to the TE.sub.10 mode of the first
electromagnetic waves, said phasing section having at least a
portion thereof adjacent said step which is beyond cutoff for
higher-order modes of the second electromagnetic wave;
radiated signals resulting from the propagation of said mode
produce the main lobe, and the primary set of side lobes which
radiate from the reflector out-of-phase with the main lobe.
4. A microwave antenna as defined in claim 3 in which said portion
has a uniform cross-section.
5. A microwave antenna as defined in claim 3 in which the frequency
of said first electromagnetic waves is higher than that of said
second electromagnetic waves, and
in which the feed horn additionally comprises a plurality of
tapered vanes parallel to the E-plane of the second electromagnetic
waves, said vanes being less than one-half wavelength apart so as
to decrease the effective mouth aperture of the horn for the second
electromagnetic waves.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a horn-paraboloidal antenna which may be
used in communication satellites to provide a radiation pattern
having a more uniform signal strength for a given beam angle.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART
Satellites used for communications over a large segment of the
earth ideally require an antenna which gives a uniform signal
strength over the entire coverage area. Such satellites may use a
despun antenna that is carefully aligned to a particular point in
its coverage area. Various tolerances in the mechanical design of
the satellite result in perturbations causing the antenna boresight
to wander about a nominal position. If the antenna pattern is not
uniform, the signal strength within the coverage area will
fluctuate. The amount of the fluctuation will depend upon the
degree of wander and the slope of the radiation pattern at a
prescribed point. With a conventional horn-paraboloidal antenna
(comprising a parabolic reflector driven from a feed horn), the
radiation pattern is ellipse shaped with maximum signal strength on
the boresight and dropping significantly near the edges, thus
resulting in large signal variations. These variations are
undesirable, detracting from the overall system performance.
Various designs utilizing antenna arrays, such as multi-horn
antennas, have been developed in order to achieve a more uniform
signal strength. However, mechanical difficulties and increased
weight resulting from the required complex feeder system have
limited the success of such approaches for satellite
applications.
In a horn-paraboloidal reflector antenna, the overall radiation
pattern can be altered by varying the illumination of the
reflector. The ideal situation from the standpoint of highest gain
and narrowest beamwidth occurs when the signal distribution over
the reflector is uniform in magnitude and phase. However, with such
an illumination, a significant proportion of the primary energy
from the horn will be lost due to spillover at the edges of the
reflector. In addition, the reduction in beamwidth is accompanied
by the generation of unwanted secondary or side lobes.
The illumination of the reflector is controlled by varying the
dimensional parameters of the horn. An increase in the waveguide
cross-section of the feed horn reduces its beam angle but is also
accompanied by the appearance of secondary lobes particularly in
the E-plane. One cause of the secondary lobes is the presence of
higher-order waves which are generated at the mouth and at the
throat discontinuity of the horn. In the H-plane the throat
reflection is usually small in comparison with the mouth reflection
and hence the horn has much lower side lobes. In previous systems,
the approach has been to illuminate the whole reflector with
in-phase energy from the main lobe and to provide a flare angle
from the horn which will cause its side lobes to miss the
reflector.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It has been discovered that if the outer portion of the parabolic
reflector is illuminated with energy which will reflect .pi.
radians out-of-phase with respect to its center, the out-of-phase
energy will subtract and reduce the boresight gain of the far field
radiation pattern. However, at a point off the axis, an additional
phase difference is introduce due to the differential path length
between the two regions. At some angle, this phase difference will
be .pi. radians with the net effect that all the aperture energy
will appear in phase and add. By a proper balance of energy levels
and aperture size, a nearly constant flat-topped radiation pattern
can be achieved. As a result, there is less deviation in the gain
for a given beamwidth and the overall gain at the beam edges is
higher.
The generation of this out-of-phase energy is obtained by
permitting the primary set of side lobes to strike the edges of the
reflector. In the H-plane however, the amplitude of the side lobes
is normally insufficient to achieve the desired radiation pattern.
It has also been discovered that by introducing an H-plane
discontinuity and by phasing the horn so that the resulting
higher-order waves arrive at the mouth of the feed horn .pi.
radians out-of-phase with those of the dominant mode, significant
side lobes can be generated in the H-plane. As a result, a
substantially flat-topped radiation pattern can be produced in the
H-plane as well as the E-plane.
Thus, in accordance with the present invention there is provided a
microwave antenna comprising a paraboloidal metallic reflector and
a metallic feed horn located at the former's focal point. The feed
horn has a throat section and a mouth aperture. Included in the
throat section in a waveguide feed section which propagates the
dominant mode but is beyond cut-off for high-order modes. In
addition, there is a discontinuity between the throat section and
the mouth aperture for excitation of a higher-order mode, and a
differential phasing section for reversing the phase of the
higher-order mode with respect to the dominant mode. As a result,
the radiation pattern from the feed horn has a main lobe, and also
has side lobes which radiate from the reflector out-of-phase with
the main lobe.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the antenna comprises a
pyramidal feed horn having a rectangular waveguide feed section
which propagates only TE.sub.10 waves. An H-plane step in the feed
horn between the throat section and the mouth aperture excites
TE.sub.30 waves while a differential phasing section is used to
reverse the phase of the TE.sub.30 waves with respect to the
TE.sub.10 waves.
In a still more preferred embodiment, the antenna is used for two
waves of orthogonal polarization. In this embodiment the H-plane
step for one wave will act as an E-plane step for the other thus
resulting in the generation of undesired higher-order waves. These
latter waves are suppressed by having a portion of the differential
phasing section which is beyond cut-off for the higher-order waves
generated by the E-plane step.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
An example embodiment of the invention will now be described with
reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a microwave antenna in accordance
with the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a substantially side-elevational view of the microwave
antenna illustrated in FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view, taken along the line III--III of
FIG. 2;
FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view, taken along the line IV--IV of
FIG. 1;
FIG. 5 is a graph of relative power and phase vs normalized
horizontal reflector aperture of the microwave antenna illustrated
in FIG. 1;
FIG. 6 is a graph of relative power vs the far field directional
pattern of a conventional horn-paraboloidal antenna and the
microwave antenna illustrated in FIG. 1.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Referring to FIG.'s 1 and 2, the microwave antenna basically
comprises a paraboloidal metallic reflector 10 having a metallic
pyramidal feed horn 11 located at its focus. The feed horn 11 is
driven from a rectangular waveguide feed section 12 which is driven
from an ortho-coupler 13 in a well known manner. The whole antenna
assembly is mounted on a rotary joint 14.
FIG.'s 3 and 4 show horizontal and vertical cross-sections of the
metallic pyramidal feed horn 11 respectively. The feed horn 11
comprises a throat section generally 20 and a mouth aperture 21.
The throat section 20 includes at least a portion of the
rectangular waveguide feed section 12. In addition, a
discontinuity, shown as a H-plane step 22, is located between the
throat section 20 and the mouth aperture 21. Following the H-plane
step 22 is a differential phasing section 23 which has a uniform
cross section. Also shown are a plurality of tapered vanes 24 which
intercept the E-plane field for one polarization and a further
plurality of tapered vanes 25 which intercept the E-plane filed for
the other polarization.
The microwave antenna of the present invention may be used in,
although not necessarily limited to, a communications satellite. In
a typical such application, the received band would be at 6 GHz.
while the transmit band would be at 4 GHz. In addition, the 6 GHz.
signals are vertically polarized while the 4 GHz. signals are
horizontally polarized.
In the present embodiment, the primary requisite is to provide a
more uniform signal strength of the horizontal radiation pattern of
the antenna shown in FIG.'s 1 and 2, at both the 4 GHz. and 6 GHz.
bands. It necessary, the technique could be extended to provide a
more uniform radiation pattern of the vertical pattern. Unless
otherwise stated, the following description will be directed
towards the two horizontal radiation patterns of the antenna.
Initially, the horizontal length and flare angle of the horn 11, as
shown in FIG. 3, are selected to generate the main lobe and a
primary set of side lobes for a horizontally polarized E-plane
radiation pattern at 4 GHz. As is well known, utilizing a large
cross-section at the mouth aperture 21 results in a narrow beam
with high side lobes in the E-plane. However, at 6 GHz. the horn
would have very low side lobes since it is an H-plane pattern, and
would be ineffectual for the purpose of beam shaping. To create the
side lobes in this plane, the symmetrical H-plane step 22 (with
respect to the 6 GHz. field) is introduced which generates the
TE.sub.30 mode from an incident TE.sub.10 mode. Thus, as shown in
FIG.'s 1, 2 and 3, the discontinuity 22 is an H-plane step at 6
GHz. while an E-plane step at 4 GHz.
Being an E-plane step at 4 GHz., the discontinuity 22 will tend to
generate the TE.sub.12 and TM.sub.12 mode pair. These latter modes
would have undesirable effects at 4 GHz. and thus cannot be allowed
to propagate. In addition, the TE.sub.30 mode must arrive at the
mouth aperture 21 .pi. radians out-of-phase with respect to the
TE.sub.10 mode in order to generate the necessary side lobes.
However, the horizontal length and flare dimensions have already
been set by the 4 GHz. requirements. Therefore, a differential
phasing section 23 is added in order to provide the necessary phase
shift of .pi. radians between the TE.sub.10 and TE.sub.30 modes at
6 GHz. This can be done by assuming the two modes (TE.sub.10,
TE.sub.30) to have an initial phase difference of 180.degree. at
the mouth aperture 21. The differential phase velocity between the
two modes can be integrated along the length of the horn 11 until a
point is reached where the two modes are in phase. This is the
first possible position for the H-plane discontinuity 22. However,
at this point, the cross-section of the horn 11 is of sufficient
size to propagate the TE.sub.12 and TM.sub.12 modes at 4 GHz. and
therefore cannot be used. The throat section 20 is therefore
extended to a cross-section where the latter mode pair are beyond
cutoff at 4 GHz. but will still propagate the TE.sub.30 mode at 6
GHz. At this point, it is necessary to add the differential phasing
section 23 of uniform cross-section to bring the TE.sub.10 and
TE.sub.30 modes in phase again. The H-plane step 22 is then
inserted at that point. The step size is selected to produce
sufficient TE.sub.30 mode to obtain the desired side lobe levels at
6 GHz. In order to assure that all the energy of the TE.sub.30 mode
propagates toward the mouth aperture 21, the throat section 20 is
further reduced to beyond cut-off for all modes except the dominant
TE.sub.10 mode. Hence, only 6 GHz. signals of the TE.sub.10 along
the waveguide feed section 12 in the vertical plane.
Thus, by utilizing the flare angle and length of the horn 11 to
control the E-plane pattern at 4 GHz. and by utilizing the H-plane
step 22 and the phasing section 23 to control the generation of the
TE.sub.30 mode at 6 GHz., the required side lobes can be generated
at the mouth aperture 21 for both horizontal signal patterns.
Since the beamwidth of a given aperture decreases in portion to the
signal wavelength, it is necessary to widen the horizontal
beamwidth at 6 GHz. relative to that at 4 GHz., so that the far
field radiation patterns will be approximately the same. This
requires concentrating more of the 6 GHz. energy at the center of
the reflector 10 by decreasing the horizontal beamwidth of the feed
horn 11 at that frequency. To achieve this, the width of the horn
11, as shown in FIG. 3, is increased. However, such an increase
would likewise affect the beamwidth at 4 GHz. To overcome this, the
tapered vanes 24 are inserted parallel to the E-plane at 4 GHz. The
vanes 24 are spaced closer than one-half wavelength apart at this
frequency so that the region between the vanes 24 is in cutoff and
therefore the 4 GHz. fields parallel to the vanes 24 cannot
propagate between them. The 6 GHz. electric fields perpendicular to
the vanes 24 are not affected and are only restricted by the
sidewalls of the horn 11 as shown in FIG. 3. By using the vanes 24
to define the 4 GHz. E-plane horn dimensions, the size of the horn
11 is effectively increased by the depth of the vanes 24 at 6 GHz.
so as to narrow the radiation pattern from the horn 11 at that
frequency.
In the vertical direction, the flare angle and length of the horn
11 are selected to optimize the 4 GHz. H-plane illumination of the
reflector 10. However, at 6 GHz., the horn 11 is an E-plane
radiator thus producing sides lobes. Because of the difference in
frequencies between the two bands the 6 GHz. vertical pattern from
the feed horn 11 is narrower than that at 4 GHz. The pattern is
further narrowed due to the difference in efficiencies in the
E-plane and H-plane. Utilizing only the walls of the horn 11 as
shown in FIG. 4, would result in side lobes from the 6 GHz. E-plane
signal stricking the reflector 10. This would result in a shaped
beam at 6 GHz. in this plane. However, since the width of the
reflector 10 was selected for a conventional radiation pattern at 4
GHz., the reflector 10 is not large enough to give the correct
shaped beamwidth. As a result, the shaped beam at 6 GHz. would be
excessively wide resulting in a loss of gain. To overcome this, the
vanes 25 are inserted parallel to the 6 GHz. E-plane, thereby
widening this pattern from the feed horn 11 sufficiently to divert
most of the side lobe energy off the edge of the reflector 10. This
provides a more uniform illumination of the reflector 10 thereby
narrowing the 6 GHz. far field vertical radiation pattern of the
antenna.
The width of the reflector 10, and the flare angle and length of
the horn 11 are selected so that both the main lobe and the primary
side lobes of both horizontal radiation patterns strike the surface
of the reflector 10. As stated above, the side lobes which radiate
from the reflector 10 must be .pi. radians out-of-phase with the
main lobe. Minor variations to the shape of the paraboloidal
reflector 10 can be made in order to optimize this phase
relationship. In addition, the edges of the reflector 10 can be
shaped as shown in order to prevent unwanted signal energy from
striking the corners of the reflector 10 thus improving the
radiation patterns. This also saves weight, an important design
aspect of a satellite antenna.
FIG. 5 illustrates the relative power and the phase of signals at
both 4 GHz. and 6 GHz. vs the normalized horizontal reflector
aperture. The side lobes at 4 GHz. are controlled by the flare
angle and length of the horn 11, as shown in FIG. 3, which alter
the E-plane illumination and phase distribution from the mouth
aperture 21. The side lobes at 6 GHz. are generated primarily by
the H-plane step 22. As is apparent from the bottom portion of FIG.
5, the phase of the two side lobes at both 4 GHz. and 6 GHz. is
substantially .pi. radians with respect to that of the main
lobe.
FIG. 6 illustrates a typical far field horizontal directional
pattern of the microwave antenna described above together with a
typical pattern of a conventional horn-paraboloid. With a beamwidth
of .+-.4.2.degree. the boresight gain is reduced by about 1 db.
over the conventional horn-paraboloid. However, the signal strength
at the .+-.4.2.degree. points is about 1.3 db. greater, thereby
yielding an overall reduction in signal variation of 2.3 db.
By utilization of the present invention, an improved horizontal
directional pattern is achieved at both the 4 GHz. and 6 GHz.
bands. While not illustrated in the present embodiment, the
invention could be readily extended to provide the same advantages
for both the vertical radiation patterns.
* * * * *