U.S. patent number 3,643,993 [Application Number 05/008,662] was granted by the patent office on 1972-02-22 for fork excluding flap for rubbish container.
This patent grant is currently assigned to G. I. Rubbish Company. Invention is credited to Manuel Asadurian.
United States Patent |
3,643,993 |
Asadurian |
February 22, 1972 |
FORK EXCLUDING FLAP FOR RUBBISH CONTAINER
Abstract
An improved container for refuse collection, which is adapted to
be lifted and dumped by an appropriate elevating mechanism, is
provided with a flap assembly on the supporting channels to prevent
entry of lifting forks from the "wrong" side.
Inventors: |
Asadurian; Manuel (Los Angeles,
CA) |
Assignee: |
G. I. Rubbish Company
(N/A)
|
Family
ID: |
21732938 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/008,662 |
Filed: |
February 4, 1970 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
294/68.26;
220/1.5; 220/315; 220/628; 220/908; 414/408; 414/608 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B65F
1/122 (20130101); B65F 2003/0279 (20130101); Y10S
220/908 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B65F
1/12 (20060101); B65F 3/02 (20060101); B65f
001/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;214/301,302,303,315,318,620,621 ;108/51,52,57 ;220/1T,1.5,35
;294/69,73 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Arnold; Philip
Assistant Examiner: Oresky; Lawrence J.
Claims
What is claimed as new is:
1. A receptacle for receiving waste matter, said receptacle
comprising:
a container having a cover hinged at the rear side thereof;
a cover coupled to said hinge;
lifting fork receiving channels attached to the bottom of said
container; and
fork excluding means coupled to said channels for limiting fork
entry to one side only, said fork excluding means comprising; a
flap member pivotably mounted on said channels to block entry of a
lifting fork and biasing means normally maintaining said flap
member in a fork excluding configuration while permitting
deflection of said flap member by a lifting fork emerging from said
channels.
2. The receptacle according to claim 1 wherein said biasing means
include a spring member connected between said flap member and said
channel means, urging said flap member to block entry of a fork
into said channel means.
3. The receptacle according to claim 1 wherein said biasing means
include a lever arm connected to said flap member and a weight
member attached to said lever arm, whereby a gravitational force
maintains said flap member in a fork-excluding configuration.
Description
This invention relates to refuse containers and more particularly
to covered refuse containers which are adapted to be lifted and
dumped by semiautomatic elevating apparatus.
In recent years, large containers for refuse, capable of being
handled by equipment that picks up and dumps the contents of the
container, have been widely utilized. Typical examples are shown in
the patents to C. R. Dempster, et al., U.S. Pat. No. 3,195,942, or
to A. Sherman, U.S. Pat. No. 3,270,900.
Such containers are frequently utilized in combination with
front-end loader equipment, such as is disclosed in the Dempster,
et al., U.S. Pat. No. 2,900,096, which includes a pair of fork-type
aRms that engage channels on the underside of the container.
arms
A common trash container in use today, has a generally rectangular
shape with a hinged lid. With this arrangement, gravity normally
keeps the lid in closed condition.
A major problem with containers of this type, when utilized with
equipment such as shown in the Dempster et al., U.S. Pat. No.
2,900,096 has been created when the truck operator engages the
refuse container from the side opposite the cover hinge. In normal
operation, the container is lifted over the cab of the truck and
rotated toward the truck body, so that the container is upended to
discharge its contents. In the proper orientation, with the lifting
forks inserted from the hinge side of the container, the rotation
of the container over the truck body causes the lid to open and the
contents are discharged with the lid acting as a partial chute,
directing the contents toward the truck body.
However, and as is frequently the case with inexperienced or
careless operators, if the container is engaged from the "front" or
opening side of the container, when the container is inverted, the
cover tends to be trapped closed, or if it does open, either the
contents are not properly discharged, or, are directed away from
the truck body by the cover, which deflects the flow. In an extreme
case, the cover can be bent or misshapen from the emptying
operation.
It has been deemed desirable to provide some means to prevent such
a covered trash or rubbish container from being engaged from the
"wrong" side to assure proper emptying of the contents. According
to the present invention, a pair of spring-loaded flaps are mounted
on the "front" of the channel members which normally receive the
forks of the automatic lifting and dumping apparatus. These
spring-loaded flaps prevent entry of the forks from the "wrong"
side but do permit protrusion of the fork through the channel when
entry is made from the "right" side, namely the hinge side of the
container.
In alternative embodiments the entry-excluding flaps can be
provided with a weighted member to maintain them in the
fork-excluding condition through gravity. Other variations are
possible, once the basic problem is recognized.
This invention will be better understood from the following
description considered in connection with the accompanying drawings
in which several preferred embodiments of the invention are
illustrated by way of example. It is to be expressly understood,
however, that the drawings are for the purpose of illustration and
description only and are not intended as a definition of the limits
of the invention.
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a trash container according to the
present invention
FIG. 2, including FIGS. 2a and 2b is a side sectional view of a
support channel without and with a lifting fork, respectively;
FIG. 3, including FIGS. 3a and 3b is a side view of a trash
container being emptied into a loader;
FIG. 4 is a side view of a loader emptying a trash bin which has
been engaged on the "wrong side;" and
FIg. 5 is a side view of an alternative lifting channel.
Turning first to FIG. 1, there is shown, in perspective, a typical
trash or rubbish container 10 which includes, the improvements
according to the present invention. The container 10 is provided
with an upper lid portion 12 which is hinged to the body 14 of the
container by either a plurality of individual hinges 16, or by a
"piano"-type hinge (not shown). For ease in later description, the
hinges 16 will be considered to define the "back" side of the
container 10 and the side opposite the hinges 16 will be
denominated the "front" side.
At each of the corners of the container 10, a caster or dolly wheel
18 is provided to make the container mobile. A pair of lifting
channels 20 are fixed to the underside of the container 10 and are
substantially rectangular channels which run the width of the
container 10 from "front" to "rear." Positioned over the channel
members 20 are covering flaps 22 which are normally positioned to
exclude entry of a lifting fork. The flaps are pivotally mounted to
the body of the container 14 through a pivot member 24. A bias
spring 26 may be provided to maintain the flaps 22 in the closed
position.
Turning next to FIG. 2 which includes FIGS. 2a and 2b , there is
shown, in side secton, the channel 20 with the covering flap 22 in
place. As is best seen in FIG. 2b, a lifting fork 30, when inserted
into the channel 20 from the rear, will extend through the length
of the channel 20. If the fork is sufficiently long, it will emerge
from the "front," moving the flap 22 out of the way. With the
movable flap 22, a fork can be inserted for its full length into
the channel 20.
It will be obvious that any attempt by a careless or inexperienced
operator to insert the lifting forks from the "front" or "wrong"
side is foiled by the flaps 22 when in the normally closed
position. However, no such obstacle exists to the insertion of the
lifting fork from the "rear" or "right" side.
Turning now to FIG. 3, which includes FIGS. 3a and 3b, in FIG. 3a,
there is shown a rubbish or trash container 10 according to the
present invention engaged by the lifting forks 30 of a front end
loader such as is illustrated in the Dempster, et al., U.S. Pat.
No. 3,195,942. Such a front end loader 50 is shown only in outline,
since the construction of the loader 50 is immaterial to the
understanding of the present invention.
As shown in FIG. 3a, either the front end loader 50 cam be moved
until the loading forks 30 engage the appropriate channels 20 of
the trash bin 10 while stationary, or, alternatively, a workman may
roll the trashbin 10 until the forks 30 have fully engaged the
channels 20 for their entire length.
The manner of emptying the trashbin is illustrated in FIG. 3b. The
forks 30 are attached to lifting arms 52, which carry the trash
container 10 in an arc over the truck cab to a position above the
truck body. An opening in the top of the truck body receives the
contents of the container 10. When the container 10 has been
carried to the appropriate discharge point above the body of the
truck 50, mechanisms connecting the forks 30 with the lifting arms
32, further rotate the trash bin 10, as shown, in the clockwise
direction to the dotted final, dumping position.
In the extreme position, gravity and the weight of the contents
causes the cover 12 to open, rotating about the hinge 16 to a fully
opened position. The contents of the container then are free to
pour from the container 10, with the cover 12 acting as a partial
chute.
At the conclusion of the dumping operation, after the contents of
the container 10 have been fully deposited into the truck body 50,
the forks 30 then rotate in the counterclockwise direction.
Similarly, the lifting arms 32 also rotate in a counterclockwise
direction, lowering the container 10 to rest upon the pavement in
front of the loader 50.
Turning to FIG. 4, a problem of a prior art bin 10', which lacks
fork-excluding flaps, is illustrated. In FIG. 4, a trash container
10'has, inadvertently, been loaded onto lifting forks 30 from the
"front." The container 10' has been elevated to a position above
the truck body 50 and in this position, the hinges 16' are at the
top of the container 10'. As the forks 30 rotate in the clockwise
direction (as viewed in the FIG.) to the position indicated by the
dotted outline, gravity and the weight of the trash or rubbish tend
to open the lid 12' from the bottom. however, gravity tends to
retain the lid 12' in the vertical alignment and therefore the lid
may not open fully.
If, for any reason, an obstruction exists which interferes with the
opening of the lid 12', then the time required to empty the
container 12' is extended. In some instances, the container may not
be fully emptied. Further, the lid 12' may be crushed or damaged by
being forced open against an obstruction, under the weight of the
contents. Yet another possible disadvantage in this orientation of
the container 10' is that the lid 12' might act as a deflector,
bouncing trash out of the truck and into the street.
Turning finally to FIG. 5, there is shown an alternative embodiment
of the fork-excluding flap of FIGS. 1 and 2. As shown in FIG. 5, a
support channel 120 is covered by a flap 122 which is pivotally
mounted to the body of a container 110 on a pivot member 124. A
weighted arm 126 is of sufficient mass to hold the flap 122 in the
closed, fork-excluding position, through the force of gravity,
alone, without the need of a bias spring.
The flap 122 can, of course, be lifted out of the way by a fork
member 30 (not shown) entering from the "rear" side of the channel
120. As with the preferred embodiment, the fork 30 is free to
extend beyond the front of the channel 120 so that the bin 110 is
fully seated on the forks during the lifting and dumping
operation.
Thus there has been shown in more than one embodiment, apparatus
intended to insure that trash containers will be properly loaded on
front-end loading equipment which is used for lifting and dumping
containers. The fork excluding flaps function to permit entry and
complete seating of the fork only when entry is made from the
correct or rear side. The flaps prevent the entry of the fork from
the "incorrect" or front side of the container.
* * * * *