U.S. patent number 3,641,576 [Application Number 05/027,562] was granted by the patent office on 1972-02-08 for printed circuit inductive loop antenna.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Zenith Radio Corporation. Invention is credited to Walter Farbanish.
United States Patent |
3,641,576 |
Farbanish |
February 8, 1972 |
PRINTED CIRCUIT INDUCTIVE LOOP ANTENNA
Abstract
A relatively high-impedance FM radio antenna is provided
consisting essentially of a circular loop of conductive foil having
a discontinuity therein and deposited on one side of a
substantially planar, nonconductive substrate. Attached to one end
of the loop is a conductive foil impedance element, such as an
inductor, for providing impedance matching in order to efficiently
transfer the received electrical signals from the high-impedance
antenna to a relatively low-impedance radio input circuit. A
conductive foil capacitance element is connected between the
impedance-matching element and the other end of the loop in order
to parallel tune the antenna to the FM radio signal band. The
capacitance is formed by depositing spaced interdigitated elongated
strips of conductive foil on the substrate, with successive strips
alternately attached to the loop end and to the impedance-matching
element.
Inventors: |
Farbanish; Walter (Park Ridge,
IL) |
Assignee: |
Zenith Radio Corporation
(Chicago, IL)
|
Family
ID: |
21838461 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/027,562 |
Filed: |
April 13, 1970 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
343/743; 343/744;
343/862 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H01Q
1/38 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H01Q
1/38 (20060101); H01q 011/12 () |
Field of
Search: |
;343/705,708,741,743,744,748,908,862 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Lieberman; Eli
Claims
I claim:
1. A high-impedance printed circuit antenna for receiving radio
signals within a predetermined frequency band and converting them
into corresponding electrical signals for application to a
relatively low-impedance radio input circuit, comprising:
means including a substantially planar nonconductive substrate for
supporting said antenna;
inductance means, including a loop of conductive foil having a
discontinuity therein and deposited on said substrate, for
receiving said radio signals and converting them into said
electrical signals;
impedance-matching means, including a conductive foil impedance
element deposited on said substrate and connected to said
inductance means, for transferring said electrical signals from
said high-impedance antenna to said relatively low-impedance input
circuit with maximum efficiency; and
capacitance means connected to said inductance means and said
matching means for broadly tuning said antenna to said frequency
band, said capacitance means including a plurality of spaced
interdigitated elongated strips of conductive foil deposited on
said substrate and having successive strips alternately connected
to said inductance means and to said matching means.
2. An antenna according to claim 1, in which said
impedance-matching means further includes a balanced transmission
line having an impedance substantially equal to said input
impedance and connected between said impedance element and said
input circuit.
3. An antenna according to claim 1, in which said impedance element
comprises a printed circuit inductance connected in phase
opposition to said inductance means.
4. An antenna according to claim 1, which further comprises an
additional portion of conductive foil connected to said loop for
reducing the value of said inductance means and reducing the Q of
the antenna.
5. An antenna according to claim 1, in which said inductance means
is a substantially circular loop, having an outside diameter of
approximately 5 inches and a foil width of approximately one-half
inch.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
It has long been a practice of radio manufacturers to incorporate a
suitable and effective receiving antenna within the confines of the
radio cabinet. The operational and appearance advantages afforded
by the use of an inductive loop antenna for intercepting
electromagnetic radio waves and impressing the intercepted waves on
the input terminals of a radio receiver are well known in the radio
art. In the home-entertainment radio field, such an antenna
provides reasonable signal reception for the AM portion of the
frequency spectrum; that is, from approximately 535 to 1,620
kilohertz. For FM radio receivers, however, the loop antenna has
not been found to be very desirable because of its low sensitivity
in the FM portion of the frequency spectrum (approximately 88 to
108 megahertz). Moreover, it has been subject to signal strength
variations resulting from the proximity of various objects
including the human body. The loop antenna suitable for AM
reception has too many turns (i.e., too much inductance and
interwinding distributed capacitance) for the FM frequency band.
Merely decreasing the number of turns does not solve the problem,
however, because although this may tune the antenna to the FM band,
there is not enough signal coupling for satisfactory FM reception.
Of course, for an antenna having a given number of turns, the
amount of signal coupling may be increased by increasing the loop
area; however, the size of the loop thereby becomes too large to
fit inside a typical radio cabinet.
Size is a limitation which is especially critical for relatively
small, transistorized portable FM radios which are presently
becoming quite popular. To overcome this limitation, radio
manufacturers have adopted a monopole antenna consisting of a
single telescoping rod and sometimes referred to as a "whip"
antenna. The rod is extended to a length of several feet (i.e.,
approximately one-quarter wavelength of the desired carrier signal)
when the radio is in use, yet it may be telescoped into the radio
cabinet when the radio is not in use so that the antenna is
substantially out of sight. Although the monopole antenna is
somewhat susceptible to signal strength variations with changes in
antenna orientation (which is especially bothersome to a person
carrying and listening to a portable receiver while walking, for
example), it does provide reasonable FM signal reception and, when
in the retracted state, it provides for a relatively attractive,
compact, and lightweight cabinet design. When extended during radio
operation, however, it is not very attractive and sometimes even
subject to breakage.
It is therefore an important object of the invention to provide a
new and improved loop antenna.
It is a more specific object of the invention to provide a new and
improved inductive loop antenna which is more economically and
aesthetically suitable for operation in a relatively small,
portable FM radio.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A high-impedance antenna constructed in accordance with the
invention for receiving radio signals within a predetermined
frequency band and converting them into corresponding electrical
signals for application to a relatively low-impedance radio input
circuit, comprises means including a substantially planar
nonconductive substrate for supporting the antenna. It further
comprises a coplanar deposition of conductive material on the
substrate, with the deposition comprising a series combination of a
single-turn inductive loop for receiving the electrical signals, a
capacitance element for tuning the antenna to the frequency band,
and an impedance-matching element for transferring the electrical
signals from the high-impedance antenna to the relatively
low-impedance input circuit.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
The features of the present invention which are believed to be
novel are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. The
invention, together with further objects and advantages thereof,
may best be understood by reference to the following description
taken in connection with the accompanying drawing, in the several
figures of which like reference numerals identify like elements,
and in which:
FIG. 1 is a plan view of a printed circuit inductive loop antenna
constructed in accordance with the invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of the equivalent circuit for the
antenna shown in FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a fragmentary plan view of an alternative embodiment of
the antenna shown in FIG. 1;
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of the equivalent circuit of the
antenna shown in FIG. 3; and
FIG. 5 is a graphical representation of the amplitude response of
the antenna shown in FIG. 1 with the antenna in a horizontal
plane.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
With reference to FIG. 1, there is shown a high-impedance printed
circuit antenna 10 for receiving radio signals within a
predetermined frequency band, such as the FM band of 88-108
megahertz, and converting them into corresponding electrical
signals for application to a relatively low-impedance input circuit
of radio 20. In accordance with the invention, inductance means in
the form of a thin, wide single-turn loop of conductive foil 11
deposited on one side of substrate 12 and having a discontinuity
therein in the general area designated "A" and defined by loop ends
11a and 11b are provided for receiving the radio signals and
converting them into electrical signals. The diameter and foil
width of loop 11 are proportioned according to the type of antenna
application being considered. For an FM radio application, the foil
may be constructed by a photoetching process using copper which may
have a thickness of 0.0015 inch and a width of approximately 0.5
inch in order to minimize the resistance of the loop and thereby
maximize the efficiency of the antenna; the substrate may be
bakelite or formica having a thickness of approximately one
thirty-second inch and of a shape conforming to that of the
loop.
In most applications, the input circuit with which the
high-impedance antenna is designed to operate has a relatively low
impedance. Accordingly, the invention also comprises impedance
matching means including a conductive foil impedance element 15
deposited on substrate 12 and connected to inductance 11 for
efficiently transferring the received electrical signals from
antenna 10 to radio 20. The precise configuration of element 15 may
be fashioned to suit the impedance-transformation requirements of
the particular application. As shown in FIG. 1, element 15 is
substantially in the shape of a 1.75-inch square having its side
member 15b connected to loop end 11b and having a slot 15c to
thereby provide an inductive reactance having a low resistance. In
this form, element 15 functions as a small single-turn inductance
having a low reactance and connected out of phase with loop 11. It
has been found that this configuration is preferable to an in-phase
configuration (see FIG. 3) with respect to stability and
bandwidth.
At the loop discontinuity generally indicated by reference
character "A," a further aspect of the invention is shown
comprising capacitance means 14 connected to inductance loop 11 at
end 11a and to element 15 at side member 15a for tuning the antenna
to the center of the particular frequency band of interest. In the
embodiment shown in FIG. 1, capacitance 14 is designed to so tune
antenna 10 by resonating the loop at 98 megahertz, the center of
the 88 to 108 megahertz FM frequency band. Capacitance 14 includes
a plurality of spaced interdigitated elongated strips 14a of
conductive foil deposited on substrate 12 with successive strips
alternately connected to inductance loop 11 at end 11a and to
matching element 15 at 15a. The amount of capacitance thus provided
is determined primarily by the number and length of the
interdigitated strips, and to a lesser degree by the dielectric
constant of the substrate. This construction provides a
substantially noninductive capacitance which thereby requires a
minimum amount of capacitance (and therefore a minimum antenna
substrate area) to tune the inductive loop. Of course, for other
applications such as a paging receiver operating on a 150-megahertz
FM carrier signal, the illustrated construction may be slightly
modified in order to resonate at 150 megahertz (i.e., the
capacitance may be reduced by decreasing the number of strips, or
shortening the strips, or a combination of both techniques in order
to properly tune the antenna to the frequency of interest).
As is true of most antennas, the optimum design of antenna 10 for a
given application is empirically determined. However, there are a
few techniques to optimize performance which are especially
applicable to the loop of the present invention. At the top of the
antenna in FIG. 1, for example, an inwardly extending essentially
rectangular portion 13 is added to the foil loop 11 in order to
reduce the value of the inductance of the loop while substantially
maintaining the same loop area which is important for maximum
signal reception. The "Q" of the antenna is thereby reduced in
order to broaden its frequency response and thus provide more
uniform signal reception across the entire frequency band of
interest. For the antenna shown in FIG. 1, the loaded "Q" is less
than 10. Of course, the particular configuration of portion 13 may
be tailored to suit specific design requirements. Another technique
is to add a small foil stub 14c to capacitance 14 as shown in order
to provide means for compensating for variations in the dielectric
material of substrate 12. In other words, since different batches
of substrate material may vary slightly in their physical
characteristics, the area of tuning stub 14c may be reduced or
increased as required (e.g., by removing some of the foil or by
adding some solder or low-value capacitance to the unattached end,
respectively) after the antenna is constructed in order to provide
a fine tuning adjustment. Furthermore, although not shown in the
drawing, a metallic ground plane consisting of a thin layer of
metal may be deposited on the rear side of the antenna substrate in
order to minimize the effects on signal reception caused by various
objects being brought in proximity to the antenna (i.e., a
"proximity effect"). As an alternative to depositing this metallic
ground plane on the rear of the substrate, the layer of metal may
be attached to the cabinet wall next to which the antenna is
closely mounted; that is, a piece of metallic ornamentation may be
affixed to the outside of a cabinet wall and the antenna parallelly
mounted adjacent thereto on the inside.
Still another technique for optimizing the performance of the
antenna in some applications is to further include in the impedance
matching means a transmission line 16 having an impedance which,
for the frequency band of interest, is substantially equal to the
input impedance of radio 20. Line 16 is connected from junctions B
and G of element 15 to the input circuit of radio 20, with junction
G providing a ground reference potential for the antenna. This
technique allows the antenna to be mounted several inches away from
the input circuit (such as on a side of the radio cabinet), yet it
permits energy transfer therebetween with minimum signal loss and
antenna detuning. Moreover, the reception of extraneous signals,
such as harmonic signals originating from the receiver's local
oscillator may be minimized by employing a balanced, shielded
transmission line and having the shield connected to ground. For an
FM radio application, a shielded transmission line having a
characteristic impedance of 50 ohms and a length of 9 inches has
been found to be quite satisfactory.
In FIG. 2, the equivalent circuit of the antenna depicted in FIG. 1
is shown in schematic diagram form. The circuit is substantially
conventional and it should be noted that it incorporates only one
of several possible known methods of impedance transformation. The
method of impedance transformation shown in FIG. 2 is sometimes
referred to as "bucking" because inductance 15 is partially in
phase opposition to the main loop inductance 11 and therefore
slightly reduces the overall inductance. It has been found that,
for an antenna constructed in accordance with the invention for an
FM radio application, this type of circuit is preferable in terms
of stability and efficiency. Alternative circuits include one with
"aiding" impedances in which inductance 15' is in phase coincidence
with the loop inductance 11' and therefore tends to increase the
overall inductance. This circuit may include two coils or simply
one coil having a tap, such as shown in FIGS. 3 and 4. Of course,
it is also possible to effect impedance transformation by
substituting a matched capacitance for inductance 15 or 15',
provided that it is properly terminated.
In FIG. 3, there is shown an alternative embodiment of the antenna
shown in FIG. 1. The structure of the antenna shown in FIG. 3 is
identical to that of FIG. 1 except for the configuration of
matching impedance element 15'. In FIG. 3, element 15' is deposited
on the substrate in substantially the reverse configuration as
compared with element 15 in FIG. 1; that is, the inductance of
element 15' is in phase coincidence with the loop inductance and is
therefore said to aid. The "aiding" configuration is acceptable but
is not quite as stable and efficient as the "bucking"
configuration. The equivalent circuit of this antenna configuration
is illustrated by the schematic diagram of FIG. 4.
The antenna structures shown in FIGS. 1 and 3 have been empirically
found to best suit the requirements of a portable FM radio
receiver. Quite obviously, the advantages of the invention may be
had with various modifications in the overall antenna structure.
For example, the shape of loop 11 may be noncircular such as an
oval, square, or rectangle. It has been found that right angles in
such configurations tend to cause interference and loss of signal
strength in the FM band; nevertheless, where a particular cabinet
configuration is controlling, a rectangular shape may still be
employed to provide satisfactory results. As discussed above,
impedance element 15 may also take on various configurations
depending on particular design objectives. Moreover, the exact size
and shape of capacitance 14 may be altered to suit the particular
design objective. The two antenna configurations shown have been
empirically developed and found to produce excellent results for
portable FM radio receivers. In addition, the relatively
nondirectional characteristic of an antenna constructed in
accordance with the invention is graphically illustrated by the
polar diagram in FIG. 5. This diagram depicts the relative response
(R) of the antenna (at center point C), positioned in a horizontal
plane, as a function of the polar coordinate of the signal source.
The 0.degree. reference axis corresponds to the top portion of the
antenna shown in FIG. 1. In all other antenna orientations, the
antenna constructed in accordance with the invention shows no
perceptible change in response. This feature of the invention is
highly desirable in small portable receivers which are frequently
carried while a person is walking and therefore subject to various
antenna orientations. It is not presently known why this antenna
has such an outstanding nondirectional characteristic, although it
may be due in part to the particular shape of the loop.
It is important to note that an antenna constructed in accordance
with the invention may be manufactured quite economically and
efficiently because of its coplanar structure and uniform
composition. That is to say, since the single-turn inductance loop,
the capacitance element, and the impedance-matching element are
composed of the same conductive material, they may be formed on the
substrate in a single manufacturing operation and thereby reduce
production costs and complexities.
Thus there has been shown a new and improved loop antenna
economically and aesthetically suitable for operation in a
relatively small, portable FM radio. The advantages of the antenna
are many. With such an antenna it is possible to confine the
antenna to the radio receiver cabinet itself and thereby eliminate
protruding devices, such as "whip" or monopole antennas, which are
subject to breakage and detract from the overall appearance of the
radio. Another advantage is the relatively nondirectional
characteristic, as shown in FIG. 5, of the printed circuit loop
antenna; that is, the antenna may be oriented in any direction
without a noticeable change in reception. This is especially
advantageous for a portable receiver, such as an FM radio or a
paging receiver, which is subject to operation in various
orientations. Furthermore, the antenna shown may be very
economically constructed using printed circuit processes providing
an antenna that is also quite durable.
While particular embodiments of the invention have been shown and
described, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that
changes and modifications may be made without departing from the
invention in its broader aspects, and, therefore, the aim in the
appended claims is to cover all such changes and modifications as
fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
* * * * *