U.S. patent number 3,634,740 [Application Number 05/029,910] was granted by the patent office on 1972-01-11 for electrostatic holddown.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Addressograph-Multigraph Corporation. Invention is credited to Phillip J. Stevko.
United States Patent |
3,634,740 |
Stevko |
January 11, 1972 |
ELECTROSTATIC HOLDDOWN
Abstract
An interdigitated grid, powered by a high-voltage generator, and
covered by a bed of material having a bulk resistivity which will
allow an electrostatic charge to be built up quickly, but decay in
holding power in a very short time.
Inventors: |
Stevko; Phillip J. (Euclid,
OH) |
Assignee: |
Addressograph-Multigraph
Corporation (Cleveland, OH)
|
Family
ID: |
21851534 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/029,910 |
Filed: |
April 20, 1970 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
361/234 |
Current CPC
Class: |
G03G
15/605 (20130101); G03B 27/6214 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
G03B
27/62 (20060101); G03G 15/00 (20060101); H02n
013/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;317/262E,144 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Beha, Jr.; William H.
Assistant Examiner: Moose, Jr.; Harry E.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. In an electrostatic sheet holding apparatus having a base
supporting a plurality of electrodes, the electrodes being
respectively commonly connected in two individual sets, and means
for applying an electrical potential to said electrodes of the two
sets so as to develop an electrostatic field adjacent to the
surface of the base and electrostatically attract a sheet to said
surface;
the improvement comprising a cover plate over said electrodes, said
cover plate being a thin sheet of a semiconductor material stable
under light in its conductive characteristics, having a bulk
resistivity of not more than 10.sup.15 ohm-centimeters, and
characterized in that a charge induced by said electrodes will not
persist and will dissipate substantially immediately upon removal
of any applied potential to said electrodes and thereby release a
sheet from said surface.
2. In a sheet-holding apparatus as defined in claim 1, said means
for applying an electrical potential being a direct current source
of high voltage and low amperage, and said cover plate having a
thickness related to the applied voltage such that a field
generated by said electrodes will penetrate said cover plate and
induce a charge in any electrostatically chargeable object in
contact with said plate.
3. In a sheet-holding apparatus as defined in claim 1, said
electrodes being interdigital.
4. In a sheet-holding apparatus as defined in claim 1,
means for transporting said sheet-holding apparatus between a
horizontal attitude loading position and a vertical position;
control means for applying the potential when said holddown device
is moved in a direction away from said loading position toward said
vertical position, said control means disconnecting said potential
source when said device is returned to said loading position to
turn off the power to said electrodes whereby the electrostatic
influence is substantially instantaneously terminated.
5. The exposure device as claimed in claim 4 wherein the third
electrode is a polyvinylchloride.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Electrostatic holddown devices are many and varied in nature,
according to the intended use. The basic premise upon which all act
is to induce electrostatic charges between a support surface and
the sheet to be supported, which charges are in the nature of
static electricity and produce holding action by induced opposite
electrical charges.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,834,132 issued to J. O. Taylor et al. in 1958,
illustrates the basic premise upon which substantially all known
electrostatic devices operate. This electrostatic sheet applying
and holding device comprises a sheet-holding means including a
relatively smooth sheet-supporting surface of electrical insulating
material. A flat electrode is supported on the back of the
sheet-supporting surface. An instrument which the inventor terms an
extended current-carrying surface, provides a second electrode. The
instrument is in the form of a roller platen. A source of
high-voltage current is connected with the flat electrode whereby
when a sheet is placed upon the sheet-supporting surface, the sheet
is charged when the roller instrument is moved thereover. The sheet
is sustained upon the supporting surface by the electrostatic
charge induced on the sheet.
Another prior art device, U.S. Pat. No. 3,359,469, produces a
charged surface by means of a high-voltage generator, and then
causes a sheet to adhere electrostatically by supplying an opposite
charge to the sheet. Such opposite supply is available from the
human body of the operator, or by an ionization wand device. When
oppositely charged in this manner, a paper sheet will adhere
tenaciously for a long period of time.
Finally, a U.S. application, Ser. No. 302,544, corresponding to
British Pat. specification No. 1,043,298 teaches the use of two
individual sets of conductors alternately interspersed with a bed
of insulating material such as fiberglass covering them. This
teaching indicates that the holding power will persist for some
period of time after the voltage source is disconnected. Each of
the known prior art teachings is of residual persistance after
holding power is established.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This invention differs from prior art in that there is created an
ability to attract and hold sheets of paper, for example, only
during the application of electrical potential to a grid.
It is an object of this invention to provide an instantaneous
holding power attraction even for highly insulating paper sheets,
which holding power is available upon the application of a high
electrical potential, and is dissipated substantially at the
instant the power is terminated.
ADVANTAGES OF THE INVENTION
The principal advantage of this invention is that paper can be
attracted and held without use of ionization wands, grounded
rollers, or the human body as a ground.
Further, it is an advantage and object of this invention to allow
paper sheets to release from the board surface as soon as the
electrical power is removed. No substantial residual holding power
is experienced, and even very lightweight paper is removable
without undue delay or effort. This is referred to as the
relaxation time.
DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
FIG. 1 is a schematic cross section of a piece of paper held
electrostatically to a board surface;
FIG. 2 is a conventional circuit diagram representation of the
structure shown in FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of a process camera having a
holddown board for original material, which board incorporates the
principles of this invention;
FIG. 4 is an exploded schematic illustration of the preferred
relationship of essential structural elements in a holddown
board;
FIG. 5 is a plan view of the board top surface with interdigitated
electrodes positioning within the board shown in phantom
outline;
FIG. 6 is a section taken along line 6--6 of FIG. 5;
FIGS. 7 and 8 are alternative grid patterns.
THEORY OF OPERATION
The actual construction of the holddown device is relatively
straightforward, and is in fact quite simple to manufacture and
use, provided the perimeters of construction and operation are
observed. Following the examples and suggestions given, an
operative device may be constructed by anyone skilled in the art
and will operate as indicated. A degree of certainty exists as to
the phenomena taking place, but is here postulated only as a theory
because of the susceptibility of other possible
interpretations.
One of the most important discoveries which made possible the
present invention is the role of bulk resistivity of the covering
bed over interdigitated electrodes, coupled with an understanding
of the function of the cover.
First, a series of calculations will indicate the role of the bulk
resistivity in producing a workable holddown action. Refer to FIG.
1. If the electrodes in fact induce a current flow through the
cover plate and through the paper sheet being held, then the arrow
diagrams indicate electrical circuits. These electrical circuits
are set forth in conventional configuration in FIG. 2.
To get a satisfactory holddown, it is postulated that I.sub.1 must
be greater than or equal to I.sub.2. Then, the resistances through
the circuit including R.sub.1 plus R.sub.2 must be less than or
equal to the resistance R.sub.3.
The resistances may be calculated by using the bulk resistivity of
the cover material multiplied by the length of the path the current
must travel, and divided by the cross-sectional areas. Knowing the
selected width of the interdigital fingers of the electrodes, and
the thickness of the cover plate chosen, a working mathematical
formula may be established to solve for the value of bulk
resistivity which will be acceptable for the cover plate in order
to achieve the desired and necessary current flow values.
Using conventional electrical mathematics, well known to those
skilled in art, the relaxation time is equal to the resistance of
the material multiplied by capacitance, or, T= R.times. C. C is
established as the permittivity of free space (Eo) multiplied by a
constant (K) and the ratio of the area to thickness of the holddown
cover desired. The constant (K) is a mathematical convenience and
is derived as the ratio of the permittivity of the material as
compared to free space
(Eo). Hence, C= Eo.times. KA/t Where K= Em/Eo
Thus C= Eo.times. Em/Eo.times. A/t= EA/t
Resistance (R) is a factor of the bulk resistivity of a material
(Pv) multiplied by the ratio of the thickness to area of the
holddown cover desired. Thus R= Pv t/A . Hence T= Pv t/A.times. Em
A/t or T= Pv= Em.
From a material standpoint, rather than electrical mathematics, the
relaxation time is a factor of the resistivity (P) multiplied by
permittivity (E). The result is the same.
Simple observation of available materials will reveal that any
possibly suitable plastic material will have a dielectric constant
which will vary by a factor of less than 5, but a bulk resistivity
which may vary by a factor of 10,000 . Hence, bulk resistivity is
the major factor of influence in material selection. By arbitrarily
selecting a maximum time in which the holding power of the board
must be reduced to a level which will allow paper to separate
easily, then the material may be selected from a manufacturer's
tables of characteristics.
In FIG. 3, a practical environment for the present invention is
illustrated in the form of a schematic representation of a
commercially available process camera. The process camera is
designed for making electrostatic masters from original material
placed on a copyboard 10. The usual method of holding original
material for process camera work is to place a clear glass cover
over the copyboard to hold the material in a flat plane. It is the
object of this invention to avoid the use of the holding glass in
order to avoid the need to keep a glass plate spotlessly clean and
also to avoid the annoyance of having small lightweight original
sheets moved by windage created by closing of a glass cover.
In the FIG. 3, the board 10 is held at a tabletop height and
attitude in order that original material may be placed on the board
either as a single piece or by a composition of several pieces. The
board is then moved to a vertical position as shown in dotted
outline by a system of links operated by a handle 12.
In the vertical position, the original material is placed on an
object plane and is moved into an opening of a light chamber 15.
Illuminating bulb 16 floods the chamber 15 and the surface of the
board with the proper intensity of light for exposure.
A bellows 18 and a lens 19 complete the enclosure portion of the
process camera. A mirror 20 is included in the system in order to
project the image upwardly to a horizontal object plane. An
autofocus linkage 21 causes the lens 19 and mirror 20 to move in
proper relationship for focusing the image. FIG. 3 illustrates one
side of the autofocus link structure and a similar structure is
placed on the opposite side of the bellows with lens 19 on a
carrier therebetween.
A source of unexposed electrostatic master paper is shown in a
stack 22 ready to be delivered through a charging station 23 to the
bottom surface of a vacuum conveyor 24. The charged master is
conveyed until it touches a switch 25 carried with the mirror 20.
The switch 25 causes the conveyor to stop until exposure is made.
Thus, regardless of the extended position of the mirror 20, the
sheet of master material is in proper location upon the image
plane.
After exposure, the master is conducted through a toning station 26
to a conveyor 27 which then passes the toned master into a fusing
station 29, and ultimately deposits the fused master on a reception
table 30.
The physical construction of a holddown board as illustrated in the
drawings consists essentially of three parts:
1. the base 32;
2. the grid 34;
3. the top coating 36.
In the preferred embodiment, the grid 34 is mounted between the
base and top coating, although there are other configurations for
special circumstances. See the prior art referred to.
The base is the foundation upon which the entire board is built. In
FIG. 3 the reference character 10 indicates the entire structure of
the holddown board, which includes a frame and a removable board
insert 40. It is the removable insert 40 that is illustrated in
FIG. 4 and will be referred to generally hereafter as the board. It
must have a suitable strength in the illustrated embodiment to
stand by itself. The reason for this is that it is used as a
removable unit on the machine and it must be capable of being taken
out and set aside without any special handling. Also, the board 40
must have some flexibility in order that it will yield when it is
used in the unit 10 with a thick magazine in place, and a glass
cover plate over the magazine. The board is capable of holding
paper sheets, but not heavy items, and accordingly in some
instances a cover plate is required as in conventional
structures.
Because the board is a removable unit that merely plugs into the
structure 10, standard printed circuit connectors are employed to
make electrical connection to the board. The base may be selected
from any one of a variety of conventional materials, and its only
essential property is that its bulk resistivity must be greater
than 10.sup.15 ohm-centimeters, or at least greater than or equal
to the resistivity of the top coating 36. The best materials for
the illustrated embodiment which have been found, have about
10.sup.16 ohm-centimeters or greater bulk resistivities. Some of
the base materials employed are polyethylene, rigid
polyvinylchloride, glass reinforced epoxy and phenolic resins.
The top coating 36 is a white opaque plastic. It must be opaque to
hide the grid 34, and white because it is used as a photographic
copyboard. This is an application limitation and not necessary to
the functioning of the board. If the board were used as a wall
hanging bulletin board, then any color, or even a clear plastic
covering would suffice. Another practical limitation is that the
top coating be at least 10 mils thick. This limitation is to keep
any operator who might come in contact with the surface of the
board while it is in operation from getting a shock. If there is no
problem of personal contact, then the top coating may be made
thinner and will permit greater holding power. Conversely, a
thicker top coating will give less holding power. The most
important property of the top coating 36 is that its bulk
resistivity be 15 ohm-centimeters or less. For this top coating 36,
such plastics as flexible polyvinylchloride, polyvinylfluoride, and
glass reinforced melamine have been used. Top coatings can be of
multilayer design also, to obtain certain surface properties. For
example, color, opaqueness, cleanability, wear resistance, and to
protect indicia lines are reasons for making composite surfaces.
Certain materials, such as nylons and acetates will operate well at
normal humidities, but cease to function at low humidities.
The grid 34, which is normally between the two layers of material
constituting the base and top coating, consists of two electrodes
45 and 46. These electrodes are spaced so that an electric
potential may be applied between them, generating an electrostatic
field. The electrodes are in the form of interdigitated fingers
about three-fourths inch wide, connected by header bars with the
normal spacing between the fingers of the electrodes about
three-sixteenths of an inch. The grid, or electrode pattern, may be
mounted on the base in many ways. The standard printed circuit
technique of etching conductors in copper-clad material, or silk
screening a conductive ink onto a base material, or hot stamping,
are other standard methods that can be used. The electrodes may
also be formed from metal foil, wires, conductive inks, or even
pencil lines. They may be applied by printing, silk screening
lithography, etching, electroplating, or drawing. Those versed in
the arts of lithography, silk screening, printed circuits, and
printing will immediately see many ways of producing the
electrodes. The term conductor or conductive ink or paint used in
this description includes resistive conductors, inks or paints.
This is true because the current needed to cause the holddown board
to operate satisfactorily is so very small that materials normally
considered as being resistive or even insulating will actually
carry enough current to make the board operate satisfactorily.
The top coating and the base material may be joined in many ways.
Examples are by laminating, heat sealing, ultrasonic welding,
gluing or adhesives. The top coating may also be merely laid on top
of the base material and will still operate as a holddown. If an
adhesive or glue is used, this material must be about the same bulk
resistivity as the top coating. If it has a high resistivity and
gets between the electrodes and the top coating, then no current
will flow through the top coating, and no holddown will occur.
The electrostatic holding action is created by applying an
electrical potential between the electrodes of from 1,000 to 4,000
volts. A voltage multiplier 50 is shown as a source of such
potential. Voltage multipliers are well known. The fact that a very
small amount of current is consumed, enables the practical use of a
voltage multiplier of inexpensive proportions. The exact voltage
potential will be determined by electrode spacing and the top
coating resistivity.
The theoretical predictions have been conferred in experimental
study. It has been proven that thick art materials may be held. The
holding power increases with the increase in finger width, because
the flux pattern is provided in a high arc over the gap from the
extreme edges of the fingers. So, for composing original work by
assembly of sheet material overlapping one another, wide electrodes
are preferred. But very small pieces which do not bridge over two
or more fingers and a gap, may not develop enough holding power.
Therefore, the fingers and spacing should not be greater than the
smaller possible pieces to be held. For example, one electrode as
in the prior art will not hold a paper sheet without the use of a
movable electrode. This invention object is directed to the
elimination of the need for separate electrodes.
* * * * *