U.S. patent number 3,634,607 [Application Number 05/047,240] was granted by the patent office on 1972-01-11 for armored cable.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Coleman Cable & Wire Company. Invention is credited to Neil Coleman.
United States Patent |
3,634,607 |
Coleman |
January 11, 1972 |
ARMORED CABLE
Abstract
An armored cable for use primarily in underwater geophysical
exploration and in offshore oil-drilling operations includes
helically wrapped layers of oriented thermoplastic strands
surrounding a jacketed core of one or more insulated conductors for
providing high-strength armored protection for the core while being
resistant to the underwater environment.
Inventors: |
Coleman; Neil (Highland Park,
IL) |
Assignee: |
Coleman Cable & Wire
Company (River Grove, IL)
|
Family
ID: |
21947846 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/047,240 |
Filed: |
June 18, 1970 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
174/120R;
174/108; 174/113R; 174/110PM |
Current CPC
Class: |
H01B
7/14 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H01B
7/14 (20060101); H01b 007/18 () |
Field of
Search: |
;174/108,109,120,113R,115,116,107,110,47 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Kozma; Thomas J.
Assistant Examiner: Grimley; A. T.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. In an armored cable having a core which is to be protected, the
combination comprising a first helically wrapped layer of oriented
thermoplastic strands surrounding said cable core, and a second
helically wrapped layer of oriented thermoplastic strands, the lay
of the strands of said second layer being opposite to the lay of
and surrounding the strands of said first layer, said first and
second layers providing armoring for the cable core.
2. Armored cable according to claim 1 wherein said thermoplastic is
polypropylene.
3. Armored cable according to claim 1 wherein each strand has a
relatively high tensile strength and a relatively low amount of
elongation at its breaking point.
4. Armored cable according to claim 1 wherein the strands of said
second layer are greater in diameter than the strands of said first
layer, each strand of said second layer corresponding to an
adjacent strand of said first layer.
5. A cable for use underwater comprising a core and at least one
layer of plastic strands surrounding the core to provide armoring
for the core, the strands having a tensile strength of at least
about 65,000 pounds per square inch and a strain no greater than
about 0.2 inches per inch.
6. A cable according to claim 5 wherein the plastic strands are
oriented polypropylene monofilaments.
7. Armored cable comprising:
a. a core having at least one insulated electrical conductor
therein and a jacket surrounding said conductor;
b. a first helically wrapped layer of oriented polypropylene
monofilaments surrounding said jacketed core;
c. a second helically wrapped layer of oriented polypropylene
monofilaments, the lay of the monofilaments of said second layer
being opposite to the lay of and surrounding the monofilaments of
said first layer to provide armoring for said core, the
monofilaments of said second layer being greater in diameter than
the monofilaments of said first layer; and
d. sheathing surrounding said second layer to protect said core
from the external environment.
Description
The present invention relates to armored cable useful in
geophysical exploration and in offshore oil-drilling operations
where the cable is placed and used underwater or in a borehole.
Reference is hereby made to Disclosure Document No. 001275 filed
Jan. 29, 1970.
Armored cable for such use is conventionally constructed by
wrapping helical layers of steel strands about an insulated or
jacketed core comprising one or more insulated conductors. Various
steels, such as plow steel, galvanized steel and stainless steel,
have been used to provide armor for such cables. The armor serves
the purpose of imparting a relatively high tensile strength to the
cable so that the cable does not break when extended to a long
distance from its secured end or when lowered to a great depth.
The industry has generally established an unofficial standard for
minimum breaking strength for such cables. Thus, it is generally
considered that the breaking strength of the cable typically must
be equal to or greater than 20 times the weight of 1,000 feet of
cable, i.e., the breaking strength must have a safety factor of 20
times the cable's own weight per 1,000 feet. In examining this
standard, it is found that a cable primarily supports its own
weight when it extends a long distance from a fixed terminal. As
steel- armored cable has a high tensile strength, it is commonly
employed where the cable is to be suspended great distances
underwater. However, the use of steel armor gives rise to a number
of disadvantages in such applications. For example, steel has a
high unit weight, and thus the major portion of the breaking or
tensile strength is required merely to support the steel armor
itself.
Steel armor, moreover, has poor ability to withstand the salt and
alkaline conditions present in an underwater environment, and is
relatively inflexible as well as being expensive. Furthermore, it
is magnetic so that it tends to interfere with electrical signals
in the core conductors, and is readily detectable by sonar devices
or the like which may be objectionable in certain military
applications.
Another disadvantage in employing steel armor for electrically
conductive cables is that special preforming equipment is needed to
form the steel strands so that they may be helically wrapped about
the cable. It is preferred that the armor strands be wrapped
helically with adjacent or contacting turns to prevent damage to
the cable core by compressive forces due to hydrostatic pressure.
However, it is difficult and expensive to form steel strands so
that they can be helically wrapped since such strands have or
retain a "memory" of their initial coiled state so that they
generally cannot be wrapped directly from a coil about the cable
and must be prebent prior to use. Typical equipment needed to
preform the steel so that it lays in adjacent turns may cost on the
order of one-half million dollars.
Accordingly, a principal object of the present invention is to
provide an improved armor for underwater cable which provides at
least the minimum breaking strength required by the industry for
such cable.
Another object of the invention is to provide an improved armored
cable able to readily withstand the environment present underwater
and which is relatively flexible and low in cost.
A further object of the invention is to provide improved armor for
underwater cable that may be applied to the cable without
necessitating the use of special preforming equipment.
These and other objects of the invention are more particularly set
forth in the following detailed description and in the accompanying
drawings of which:
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a portion of an armored cable
constructed in accordance with the present embodiment of the
invention, partially broken away to show the layers of armor;
FIG. 2 is an enlarged cross-sectional view taken along the line
2--2 in FIG. 1; and
FIG. 3 is a graphical representation of typical stress-strain
relationships for various materials having potential use as armor
for underwater cables.
Referring to FIG. 1 of the drawing, there is shown a portion of an
armored cable generally indicated by the reference number 10. The
armored cable 10 is particularly useful in geophysical exploration
and in offshore oil-drilling operations where the cable is
suspended and used underwater. The cable is armored in order to
give it high tensile strength so that it may be extended great
distances from its terminal or at great depths underwater and so
that the cable is protected from external hydrostatic pressures.
The armored cable 10 is intended, for example, to be secured at one
end to electronic equipment on a ship or other terminal and at its
other end to electronic exploration devices or the like, via
suitable connectors (not shown) of conventional construction. Such
connectors typically comprise well-known means for relieving the
great tensile or longitudinal stresses on the core, placing
essentially the entire loading on the armor, and form no part of
the present invention.
As shown in FIG. 2, the armored cable 10 has a cable core generally
designated by the reference numeral 12, that typically includes one
or more coaxial cables 14 and a plurality of single conductors 16.
Each of the coaxial cables 14 and single conductors 16 desirably
contains insulation 18 thereabout fabricated of a nonconductive
plastic material or the like. A rubber filler 20 or other flexible
composition advantageously occupies the spaces between the
conductors while a binder 22 typically surrounds the rubber filler
20 in order to maintain the conductors in proper position within
the core 12 during fabrication of the cable 10. The binder 22
typically comprises a polyester material, such as Mylar, having one
adhesive side engaging the rubber filler 20, although other binders
may also be suitable. A jacket 24 encloses the conductors,
insulation and filling. It may be of any suitable type and be
fabricated of rubber for protecting the conductors and defining the
core. Preferably, the jacket 24 is resilient so that the core 12 is
not unequally compressed due to hydrostatic pressures. Any suitable
core 12 construction might be employed and these details of core
construction do not form a part of the present invention.
It is a feature of the present structure that the core 12 is
surrounded by plastic armor to give high tensile strength to the
cable and to prevent the cable from being compressed by hydrostatic
pressures. The armor, which is generally designated by the
reference numeral 26, comprises a first layer 28 of individual
filaments or strands 30 of high-strength plastic material
surrounding and protecting the core 12 and a second layer 32 of
similar strands or filaments 34 surrounding the first layer 28 of
strands 30. As best seen in FIG. 1, the strands 30 constituting the
first layer 28 of armor are helically or spirally wrapped about the
jacket 24. The strands 34 constituting the second layer 32 of armor
are helically or spirally wrapped about the first layer 28, the
strands 34, however, having an opposite direction of lay to the lay
of the strands 30. If the strands 30 are wrapped clockwise, then
the strands 34 are desirably wrapped counterclockwise.
Referring to FIG. 2 of the drawing, it may be seen that the strands
30 of the first layer 28 are smaller in diameter than the strands
34 of the second layer 32. Each strand 34 of the second layer 32
thus corresponds with a strand 30 of the first layer 28. Hence, an
equal number of strands are present in both the first and second
layers 28 and 32. The purpose of having an equal number of strands
or filaments in each layer is to prevent hydrostatic pressure from
compressing the core 12 unequally in any given direction. The
double wrapping of the strands or filaments 30 and 34 in
combination with disposing the larger strands in the outer layer
prevents distortion of the core 12 by hydrostatic pressures, which
would otherwise be likely to produce deleterious electrical effects
when the cable 10 is in use.
Each of the strands or filaments 30 and 34 is preferably fabricated
of a plastic material such as an oriented thermoplastic. The
material employed, which serves as a substitute for conventionally
used steel armor, must impart a relatively high tensile strength to
the cable 10. It should be apparent that oriented thermoplastic
materials generally have much lower breaking strength than steel or
other metals. However, such thermoplastic materials are also
relatively lightweight, and require less strength to support their
own weight. Typically, a cable like cable 10, but employing steel
armor weighs about 480 pounds per 1,000 feet and has a breaking
strength of about 10,320 pounds. By replacing the steel with a
lightweight thermoplastic material, a cable of the same dimensions
will weigh about 140 pounds per 1,000 feet. Industry standards
require that such cables used in underwater exploration and
oil-drilling operations have a breaking strength equal to or
greater than 20 times the weight of 1,000 feet of the cable. Hence,
to provide a safe cable 10 employing thermoplastic armor 26
requires that the breaking strength of the cable exceed 2,800
pounds, i.e., 140 pounds per 1,000 feet multiplied by a safety
factor of 20. Another requirement which must be satisfied by cables
10 employing thermoplastic armor 26 is that the armor be
sufficiently resilient that the cable be able to withstand the
generally anticipated or forseeable shearing impacts that a
steel-armored cable would be capable of withstanding. Still another
requirement which must be met by the oriented thermoplastic
material is that the material have a low strain ratio; i.e., it is
desirable that the armor 26 not elongate to any substantial degree.
If the armor readily stretches, the entire tensile stress must then
be absorbed by the core 12, rather than by the armor 26, causing
the core to break and disrupting electrical communication.
Referring to FIG. 3 of the drawings, which is a graphical
representation of typical stress-strain values which might be
obtained for various materials, it can be seen that oriented
polypropylene or compositions thereof is a preferred material for
use as a substitute for steel in providing armor 26 for underwater
cables 10. Other homopolymers such as polyethylene and nylon, each
break at lower tensile stresses than oriented polypropylene.
Moreover, these other homopolymers each absorb a higher strain
through elasticity than does oriented polypropylene before reaching
their breakpoint. Hence, oriented polypropylene has characteristics
more closely akin to steel than do the above-mentioned homopolymers
and thus is more suitable for the purpose of the present
invention.
Oriented polypropylene also exceeds the other standards that have
been generally established for armored cables. A typical cable 10
employing armor 26 fabricated of oriented polypropylene
monofilaments has been found to have a breaking strength of about
3,096 pounds. As the minimum required breaking strength for a cable
of the given dimensions is about 2,800 pounds (as stated above),
such cable is suitable for the uses contemplated by the present
invention. Even though oriented polypropylene has only about
one-third the tensile strength of steel, it also has only about
one-third the weight. Oriented polypropylene is not only
lightweight but is sufficiently resilient to withstand any
anticipated or forseeable impact tending to shear the cable 10,
even though the shear strength of the material itself is lower than
that of steel. Oriented polypropylene is not magnetic and thus does
not interfere with electrical signals and may not be detected by
underwater detection devices, e.g., sonar devices. Special
preforming equipment is not needed to wrap strands fabricated of
oriented polypropylene about the cores of the cables. Armor 26
fabricated of oriented polypropylene filament may be applied in
helically wrapped layers of opposite lay in order to prevent
hydrostatic pressures from affecting the cable core 12.
It is contemplated that other thermoplastics, and oriented
thermoplastics in particular, having the same or similar
characteristics as oriented polypropylene may alternatively be
employed as armor 26 for underwater cables 10. Oriented
polypropylene has a tensile strength of about 65,000 p.s.i. and a
maximum elongation of about 20 percent at the breakpoint (a strain
ratio of 0.2 in./in.). Unoriented nylon, on the other hand, has a
tensile strength of up to about 12,000 p.s.i. and a maximum
elongation of up to 300 percent. Polyethylene has even less tensile
strength than nylon and may elongate as much as 800 or 1,000
percent. See Modern Plastics Encyclopedia for 1968-69, pages 92-99.
Oriented polypropylene does not absorb moisture, has excellent
abrasion resistance, is difficult to ignite and upon burning melts
to a bead, and has excellent chemical resistance to most acids,
alkalies and salts. Although the cost of oriented polypropylene is
somewhat greater per pound than the cost of galvanized steel, the
weight of material used in providing armor 26 for a cable 10 is so
much less than the weight of steel armor needed that the cost of
the cable itself is substantially less.
To complete the cable 10 of the illustrated embodiment, a sheathing
36 is disposed about the second layer 32 of armor in order to
protect the cable from the external environment. The sheathing 36
is desirably constructed of hard rubber or somewhat flexible
plastic material or any other suitable waterproof material capable
of being extruded, molded or otherwise disposed about a core.
Thus, the present structure provides a lightweight armored cable 10
useful primarily in underwater geophysical exploration and in
underwater oil-drilling operations or the like. Cable 10 employing
armor 26 fabricated of oriented polypropylene has a relatively high
tensile strength and meets the typical standards for minimum
breaking strength for armored cables. Such armor may be wrapped in
helical layers to protect the cable core 12 from compressive
hydrostatic forces without special preforming equipment.
Furthermore, the armor is sufficiently resilient to withstand
normal shearing impacts and is nonmagnetic.
While one specific form of the invention has been shown and
described, it should be apparent that various modifications could
be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention.
The principles of the present invention are applicable to cables
having various core constructions and which require armoring to
protect the core.
Various features of the invention are set forth in the following
claims.
* * * * *