U.S. patent number 3,634,125 [Application Number 04/752,767] was granted by the patent office on 1972-01-11 for method of coating iron or titanium containing substrate with poly(arylene sulfide).
This patent grant is currently assigned to Phillips Petroleum Company. Invention is credited to Dale O. Tieszen.
United States Patent |
3,634,125 |
Tieszen |
January 11, 1972 |
METHOD OF COATING IRON OR TITANIUM CONTAINING SUBSTRATE WITH
POLY(ARYLENE SULFIDE)
Abstract
A substrate of iron or titanium or an alloy containing iron
and/or titanium is pretreated at a temperature of about 650.degree.
F. or higher, and thereafter coated with a composition comprising a
poly(arylene sulfide).
Inventors: |
Tieszen; Dale O. (Bartlesville,
OK) |
Assignee: |
Phillips Petroleum Company
(N/A)
|
Family
ID: |
25027747 |
Appl.
No.: |
04/752,767 |
Filed: |
August 15, 1968 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
427/223;
427/318 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C09D
181/02 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
C09D
181/00 (20060101); C09D 181/02 (20060101); B44d
001/34 () |
Field of
Search: |
;117/49,132B,132C
;260/79 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Other References
Gregory et al., Heat Treatment of Steel, N.Y., Pitman, 1958, p. 28,
32, 353, 216 and 217. TS320G72, 1958 .
McClintick et al., Physical Metallurgy and Heat Treatment of
Titanium Alloys, Niles, Ohio, Mallory-Sharon, 1955, p. 26.
TN799TSM21.
|
Primary Examiner: Leavitt; Alfred L.
Assistant Examiner: Bell; Janyce A.
Claims
I claim:
1. A coating process comprising the following sequential steps:
pretreating a substrate selected from the group consisting of iron,
titanium, and alloys containing a major proportion of at least one
of iron and titanium, which substrate exhibits a weak bond to
poly(arylene sulfide), by heating said substrate to a temperature
of at least 650.degree. F.; cooling said substrate; and thereafter
applying to said pretreated substrate a coating composition
comprising said poly(arylene sulfide).
2. A process according to claim 1 wherein said substrate is heated
in an oven at a temperature between 675.degree.- 800.degree. F. for
between 15 and 90 minutes.
3. A process according to claim 1 wherein said pretreatment
comprises flame treatment.
4. A process according to claim 1 wherein said pretreatment
comprises flame treating with a gas oxygen flame until said
substrate turns bluish.
5. A process according to claim 1 wherein said coating composition
contains 0.5 to 50 weight percent TiO.sub.2 based on the total
weight of the poly(arylene sulfide) and TiO.sub.2.
6. A process according to claim 1 wherein said poly(arylene
sulfide) is poly(phenylene sulfide).
7. A process according to claim 1 wherein said coating composition
is applied in the form a slurry in a diluent.
8. A process according to claim 7 wherein said poly(arylene
sulfide) is poly(phenylene sulfide), said process comprising in
addition heating said composition, after said composition has been
applied to said substrate, at a temperature within the range of
550.degree. to 800.degree. F. to evaporate said diluent and fuse
said poly(arylene sulfide) into a continuous coating.
9. A process according to claim 8 wherein said poly(phenylene
sulfide) contains between 0.5 and 50 weight percent Ti0.sub.2 based
on the total weight of the poly(arylene sulfide) and TiO.sub.2.
10. A process according to claim 9 wherein said substrate is
steel.
11. A process according to claim 9 wherein said substrate is
titanium.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to improved methods of applying poly(arylene
sulfide) coatings. In a more specific aspect, it relates to
heattreating iron or titanium containing substrates prior to
coating with poly(arylene sulfide) compositions such as
poly(phenylene sulfide).
Poly(arylene sulfides) such as poly(phenylene sulfide) are well
known in the art for their high-temperature stability. While it is
generally regarded in the art that these polymers can be adhered to
metallic substrates, poly(arylene sulfide) coated articles have not
yet achieved significant commercial success. It has been found
that, while poly(arylene sulfides) do adhere to metal substrates as
broadly alleged in the prior art, the metals which would be of
greatest commercial significance if coated with a poly(arylene
sulfide), such as steel, titanium, and alloys containing iron
and/or titanium, form a very weak bond to the poly(arylene
sulfide). Efforts to improve the bond to these particular metals by
conventional cleaning treatments, such as degreasing with a solvent
or cleaning with acid have proven unsuccessful, indicating that the
problem is of a more fundamental nature than simple interference
with the bond by impurities on the surface of the metal.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of this invention to provide an improved
high-temperature laminate; it is a further object of this invention
to provide a coating which is uniformly adhered to a substrate; and
it is a still further object of this invention to provide a
treating process for iron or titanium containing substrates which
will allow improved adhesion to poly(arylene sulfides).
In accordance with this invention, iron or titanium containing
substrates are pretreated at a temperature of about 650.degree. F.
or higher prior to application of a coating of a poly(arylene
sulfide).
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Any poly(arylene sulfide) can be used in the practice of this
invention. Suitable polymers are disclosed, for instance, in
Edmonds et al., U.S. Pat. No. 3,354,129, Nov. 21, 1967. The
presently preferred polymer is poly(phenylene sulfide).
The term poly(arylene sulfide) is meant to include not only
homopolymers but also arylene sulfide copolymers, terpolymers, and
the like. Suitable poly(arylene sulfides) of this invention are
those having inherent viscosities in chloronaphthalene at
206.degree. C. of at least 0.1, preferably between 0.1 and 0.3,
more preferably between 0.13 and 0.23.
The term iron as used herein is meant to include steel and any
alloy containing iron as a major constituent. The instant invention
is applicable to steel substrates, titanium substrates, and
substrates of alloys containing a major proportion of iron and/or
titanium.
The high-temperature pretreating step for the substrate can be
carried out by any means known to the art, such as in an oven or in
a flame, preferably a gas oxygen flame. The treatment can be
carried out at any temperature between about 650.degree. F. and the
temperature at which the particular metal in question begins to
deform or soften. Preferably, temperatures of
675.degree.-800.degree. are used for the oven treatment.
Preferably, the flame treatment is done with a gas oxygen flame
having a temperature of about 1,815.degree. C. (natural gas plus
oxygen gives a flame of about 2,930.degree. C. and can also be
used), and is continued until the metal begins to turn bluish.
Preferably, this pretreating step is carried out in the presence of
an oxygen-containing gas such as air.
This pretreating step can take from 1 second to 5 hours. Generally,
if oven treating is being utilized, the time will vary from about
15 to 90 minutes depending on the temperature. When the gas oxygen
flame is used, the treatment is generally continued until a color
change is noted in the metal, for instance when the metal begins to
turn bluish. This time will vary greatly depending on the intensity
of the flame, but generally will be within the range of 1 to 5
minutes.
In a preferred embodiment, the poly(arylene sulfide) coating
composition contains titanium dioxide. Any titanium dioxide can be
used. The presently preferred form is the rutile form. The titanium
dioxide can be present in an amount within the range of 0.5 to 50
weight percent based on the weight of the solids, that is, the
weight of the poly(arylene sulfide) and the titanium dioxide. More
preferably, the concentration of titanium dioxide will be within
the range of 10 to 35 weight percent.
After the substrate has been given the high-temperature
pretreatment and has cooled, the coating is preferably applied in
the form of a slurry of the poly(arylene sulfide) and titanium
dioxide in an inert diluent.
Any low-boiling liquid can be used as the diluent. Preferred
materials include ethylene glycol, methyl alcohol, water, and
toluene, width ethylene glycol being the most preferred diluent.
Certain high-boiling materials such as chlorinated biphenyl and
dimethyl phthalate have been found to be less satisfactory. The
coating slurries can be applied by any conventional means such as
spraying, smoothing with a doctor blade, and the like. In addition,
the compositions can be blended with conventional additives such as
stabilizers, softeners, extenders, other polymers, other pigments,
specific curing agents, and the like.
During the fusing step after the coating has been applied, the
solvent is first evaporated off, and then at about 500.degree. F.,
the polymer melts and fuses together into a continuous coating.
While cross-linking agents can be added, it is preferred to allow
the cross-linking to take place without specific additives for that
purpose. The exact nature of the cross-linking reaction is not
known, but is is known that it occurs much faster in the presence
of air or oxygen than in an inert atmosphere. Preferably, the
curing is done in air at a temperature of 550.degree.-800.degree.
F., preferably 650.degree.-750.degree. F., the preferred time
within the range of 1 minute to 5 hours, preferably 15 minutes to 2
hours. Of course, there is a relationship between time,
temperature, and oxygen, and at higher temperatures and/or higher
oxygen contents, the time can be reduced.
EXAMPLE I
A slurry of 60 grams of poly(phenylene sulfide) and 20 grams of
rutile titanium dioxide in 180 grams of ethylene glycol was stirred
in a Waring blender for 15 minutes. The poly(phenylene sulfide) was
an uncross-linked product having an inherent viscosity in
chloronaphthalene of 0.2 at 206.degree. C. (In runs 1 and 3, the
titanium dioxide was omitted from the formulation). Steel panels
measuring 3.times.6 inches were coated with this formulation; three
separate coats were applied, the composition being cured at about
700.degree. F. for about one-half hour after each coating. The
following sequential steps were carried out on said steel panels.
All of the steel panels were first cleaned by wiping with acetone.
The control panel was then coated directly, while in runs 1 and 2
the panel was pretreated at 700.degree. F. in an oven under air
atmosphere and run 3 was flame treated for 2 minutes prior to
coating. All of the pretreated panels were cooled prior to applying
the coating. The results were as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Temperature Titanium Reverse of dioxide, Impact, Run Pretreatment
Pretreatment weight % in.-lb.*
__________________________________________________________________________
Control No -- 25 <20 1 Yes 700 0 <100(>20) 2 Yes 700 25
>160 3 Yes Gas Flame 0 >160
__________________________________________________________________________
*Gardner Laboratories Reverse Impact Tester. This equipment
comprises a rounded tip which rests above the sample on the reverse
side from the coating. A ram is raised a calibrated distance and
dropped against the tip which then impinges on the back side of the
coated slab. The side opposite that which comes in contact with the
tip, that is, the side having the coating, is examined for cracks
and looseness of the coating.
A comparison of runs 1 and 2 with the control reveals that at
700.degree. F. pretreatment, neither the pretreatment nor the
presence of titanium dioxide gave a coating that was resistant to
reverse impact test at 160 in.-lb. However, a combination of
pretreating the panels at 700.degree. and the presence of the
titanium dioxide in the poly(arylene sulfide) sulfide) composition
does give such a bond. Thus, surprisingly, while heat treatment at
700.degree. F. alone will not effect the exceptionally tough bond
as exemplified by a >160 value for reverse impact, nor will the
presence of the titanium dioxide alone, the combination of the two
coact to give the unexpected result, namely a coating so tough that
it does not fail at the limiting of the test machine.
It is further noted that the heat treatment at 700.degree. F. does
effect some improvement in the quality of the coating and further
that heat treatment at higher temperatures, either in the oven or
by means of a gas flame as noted by run 3, will effect the
production of an unexpectedly high bond without the presence of
titanium dioxide.
EXAMPLE II
The following conventional cleaning techniques were employed on
steel panels in lieu of the high-temperature pretreatment, and the
panels were thereafter coated and otherwise treated in a manner
similar to that in example I. All of the following treatments
resulted in either no improvement in adhesion or else detracted
from the quality of the bond.
A. 10 percent sulfuric acid, followed by water rinse.
B. 15 percent phosphoric acid.
C. Zinc phosphate (Panels dipped in a solution of 300 grams, 85
percent H.sub.3 PO.sub.4 and 250 grams Zn.sub.3 (PO.sub.4).sub.2,
in 1,200 grams deionized water.
D. Commercial iron phosphate treatment.
E. Degreased with methylene chloride, scrubbed with steel wool,
rinsed, dipped in 10 percent sodium hydroxide at room temperature
for 10 minutes, then dried in oven.
F. Steel panel wiped with methylene chloride, steel wool treated,
rinsed and dried. Then treated with 10 percent sulfuric acid--10
percent nitric acid--80 percent water for 5 minutes. Thereafter
rinsed for a few seconds and treated with 60 ml. concentrated HC1,
40 ml. water, and 30 percent hydrogen peroxide. Again rinsed,
dried, and again polished with steel wool, rinsed and dried.
EXAMPLE III
A formulation similar to that of example I was applied to titanium
coupons. One group of the coupons has been pretreated in a gas
oxygen flame until the metal turned blue. The other was simply
degreased with a solvent. The coating was then cut with a knife
blade in the area to be tested. The coating on the laminate with
the substrate which has been pretreated in a flame passed the 160
in.-lb. reverse impact test which was the limit of the machine and
the coatings on the coupons which had not received the flame
treatment failed this test at 160 in.-lb.
EXAMPLE IV
Aluminum coupons were coated with a formulation similar to that of
example I. One group of the aluminum coupons was given a
high-temperature pretreatment and the other was not. In both
instances, the metal failed in the reverse impact test with the
bonds still intact.
The data in example II reveals that conventional cleaning
techniques do not improve the bond whereas, surprisingly, the heat
treatment of the instant invention does. Example IV shows that no
improvement is effected by heat treatment of aluminum, as evidenced
by the reverse impact test.
It is noted that even the samples which were not treated in
accordance with this invention do adhere to the poly(arylene
sulfide) coating compositions as is clearly shown by the prior art.
However, the treatments of the instant invention bring about such
an improvement in the bond that the bond does not fail at the upper
limits of the conventional testing machinery.
While this invention has been described in detail for the purpose
of illustration, it is not to be construed as limited thereby, but
is intended to cover all changes and modifications within the
spirit and scope thereof.
* * * * *