U.S. patent number 3,633,210 [Application Number 04/641,841] was granted by the patent office on 1972-01-04 for unbalanced conical spiral antenna.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Philco-Ford Corporation. Invention is credited to William G. Scott, William S. Wales, Charles Webster Westerman.
United States Patent |
3,633,210 |
Westerman , et al. |
January 4, 1972 |
**Please see images for:
( Certificate of Correction ) ** |
UNBALANCED CONICAL SPIRAL ANTENNA
Abstract
A directional broadband antenna utilizing two dissimilar
interleaved spiral radiators of conical configuration with radio
equipment optionally housed in shield within dielectric conical
support for radiators.
Inventors: |
Westerman; Charles Webster
(Anaheim, CA), Scott; William G. (Orange, CA), Wales;
William S. (Long Beach, CA) |
Assignee: |
Philco-Ford Corporation
(Philadelphia, PA)
|
Family
ID: |
24574075 |
Appl.
No.: |
04/641,841 |
Filed: |
May 26, 1967 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
343/895 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H01Q
11/083 (20130101); H01Q 1/38 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H01Q
11/08 (20060101); H01Q 1/38 (20060101); H01Q
11/00 (20060101); H01q 001/36 () |
Field of
Search: |
;343/895 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Bennett, Jr.; Rodney D.
Assistant Examiner: Berger; Richard E.
Claims
1. A directional broadband antenna comprising two elongated
electrical conductors shaped in a three-dimensional configuration
such that (1) the projection thereof on a planar surface is a pair
of separated interleaved spirals and (2) no two separate points on
the axis of either of said conductors lie in any one plane parallel
to said planar surface, said conductors being electrically
dissimilar such that if two respective points on said conductors
which lie in a plane parallel to said planar surface are excited by
a radiofrequency voltage source, the resultant standing-wave
current pattern in said conductors, and hence the resultant fields
produced thereby, will be in phase over a corresponding portion of
each of said conductors with respect to said coplanar points,
whereby said antenna will be able to radiate efficiently even
though said conductors
2. The antenna of claim 1 wherein a portion of only one of said
conductors has a zigzag configuration, the projection of the
envelope of said zigzag
3. The antenna of claim 1 further including a dielectric cone, said
conductors being formed on the tapered surface of said dielectric
cone.
4. The antenna of claim 1 further including a dielectric cone, said
conductors being formed on the tapered surface of said dielectric
cone, and further including a conductive enclosure positioned
within said cone, said enclosure containing electronic means for
supplying radiofrequency energy to said antenna, and means for
coupling radiofrequency energy from said electronic means to a pair
of coplanar points on said respective
5. The antenna of claim 4 in which said conductors are excited at
the ends
6. A broadband directional antenna comprising a conical dielectric
support, a pair of conductors positioned on said support, said
conductors having a configuration such that the projection thereof
on a plane perpendicular to the axis of said cone is a pair of
interleaved spirals, the end of one of said conductors being
coplanar with and displaced from the end of the other by an angle
of about 180.degree., said conductors being electrically dissimilar
such that if said ends thereof are excited by a radiofrequency
voltage source, the standing-wave current patterns in said
conductors, and hence the resultant fields produced thereby, will
be in phase over a
7. The antenna of claim 6 wherein one only of said conductors has a
zigzag configuration over a portion of its length, the projection
of the envelope
8. The antenna of claim 6 further including a conductive enclosure
positioned within said conical support, and also including a source
of
10. The antenna of claim 8 wherein said conductors are flat strips
formed on said conical support, the width of said strips increasing
toward the wider part of said support, one of said strips having a
zigzag portion near the end thereof at the base of said support,
the envelope of said zigzag portion forming part of one of said
spirals, the end of said one strip having a U-shaped loading
element connected thereto, a conical conductive enclosure having
substantially the same taper angle as said conical support
positioned within said support, said enclosure including a source
of radiofrequency energy for exciting said antenna, and means
coupling said source to the ends of said strips at the narrower end
of said conical support.
Description
This invention relates generally to antennas and particularly to a
broadband directionally radiating antenna of very small volume in
relation to comparable counterparts thereof.
The prior art conical spiral antenna, typified in U.S. Pat. No.
2,958,081 to Dyson, granted Oct. 25, 1960, is capable of broadband
directional-radiating characteristics. However this type of antenna
must have a relatively large size in order to radiate efficiently.
For example, the prior art conical spiral antenna normally occupies
about 0.04 cubic wavelength of volume at the longest wavelength of
its operating band. As will be recognized by those skilled in the
art, this size is undesirably large and creates various
difficulties in practical installations of the antenna. It would
therefore be highly desirable to provide a wideband, directionally
radiating antenna of greatly reduced size.
Accordingly, several objects of the present invention are: (1) to
provide a directional broadband antenna of greatly reduced size,
and (2) to provide an improved conical spiral antenna. Another
object is to provide an antenna in which transmitting or other
equipment can be housed conveniently within the antenna so as not
to require additional space. Further objects and advantages of the
present invention will become apparent from the ensuing description
thereof.
SUMMARY
A directional broadband antenna of greatly reduced size is provided
in the form of a two-arm conical spiral antenna in which the
electrical characteristics of the arms are dissimilar so as to
create different standing wave patterns on the respective arms.
Thereby identical fields will exist over a corresponding portion of
each arm so that the antenna will be able to radiate efficiently
even though the spacing between the arms is reduced by reducing the
size of the antenna. Also radio equipment may optionally be housed
within a shielded enclosure positioned within a conical support for
the antenna.
DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a diagram of charge distributions on balanced and
unbalanced lines which aids in understanding the present
invention,
FIG. 2 is a side elevational view of one form of the antenna of the
invention,
FIG. 3 is an end view of the antenna of FIG. 2,
FIGS. 4 and 5 are flat developments of the respective radiating
elements of one form of the antenna of the invention,
FIG. 6 is a skeleton view of one practical installation of the
antenna of the invention showing the placement of radio equipment
within the antenna.
FIG. 1
A typical prior art conical spiral antenna (not shown) comprised a
pair of identical (balanced) conductors formed on a dielectrical
conical surface with one conductor displaced from the other by
180.degree.. Thus a projection of the two conductors on a planar
surface perpendicular to the axis of the cone was a pair of
interleaved spirals. As stated, this antenna had to be relatively
large in order to radiate efficiently. The necessity for its
relatively large size is due to the need for preventing the fields
produced by each conductor, which are at all times equal and
opposite at all corresponding portions of both conductors, from
canceling each other.
FIG. 1A shows a diagram of the theoretical charge distribution on
the unwrapped arms of a typical prior art balanced spiral antenna.
It can be seen that the current nodes on each conductor are at
corresponding points on each conductor and, as represented by the
(+) and (-) signs, the instantaneous field produced by one
conductor is opposite to that produced by the other conductor at
all corresponding points. Since the fields produced by the separate
conductors are equal and opposite, a large amount of mutual
cancellation will occur unless the conductors are spaced apart by a
substantial fraction of a wavelength. Thus in order to be able to
radiate efficiently, the balanced conical spiral antenna had to be
relatively large.
According to the invention, a conical spiral antenna is provided in
which the respective arms thereof are electrically dissimilar so as
to provide an unbalanced arrangement. Thereby the standing-wave
patterns on the respective arms, and the fields created on the two
arms will not be equal and opposite over corresponding portions of
both arms but will actually be in phase over a large corresponding
portion of both arms. No cancellation will occur over these
in-phase portions so that efficient radiation will be provided even
though the arms are closely spaced by a very small fraction of a
wavelength.
FIG. 1B shows a diagram of the instantaneous charge distribution on
the unwrapped arms of an unbalanced spiral antenna according to the
invention. The lower arm B is made electrically dissimilar to the
upper arm A by providing, in one preferred embodiment, a slow wave
portion on arm B by shaping the right end thereof in the form of a
zigzag. This slow wave portion will shift the current node 10 on
arm B to the right, toward the slow wave portion. This will shift
the entire field produced by arm B to the right so as to create a
region 12 on both arms in which the charges produced by the
respective arms are similar. It will be evident that the arms now
will be able to radiate efficiently no matter how closely the arms
are spaced since no opposite polarity, mutually cancelling fields
will exist in region 12.
FIGS. 2 and 3
FIGS. 2 and 3 show side elevational and end views of an unbalanced
conical spiral antenna according to the preferred embodiment of the
invention in which unbalanced arms such as shown in FIG. 1B are
formed on a conical dielectric support 14. As indicated by the end
view of FIG. 3, which shows a projection of the arms on a planar
surface perpendicular to the axis of the cone, the arms form a pair
of interleaved equiangular spirals, with the envelope of the zigzag
portion 16 forming part of the spiral shape of arm B.
The dielectric support 14 has no significant electrical function
and may be omitted if the arms are made rigid enough to be
self-supporting or are otherwise supported.
The arms are normally excited at the ends thereof closest to the
narrower end of the conical support 14. As indicated by arrows 18,
the antenna will radiate in the direction in which the cone points
over the higher frequency portion of the operating band. Over the
lower frequency portion of the operating band, the antenna will
radiate with less intensity in the direction in which the cone
points, but with increasing intensity in the directions normal to
the cone's axis.
The length of the unbalancing zigzag portion 16 of arm B is not
critical and desirably extends up from the end of the arm from
one-eighth to one-fourth wavelength at the lowest wavelength of the
radiated band as measured along the centerline of the arm. The
"U"-shaped portion 19 at the end of the zigzag is an end loading
element for fine tuning; this element has been found to increase
the operating bandwidth by reducing the lowest operating frequency
by 20 percent.
The use of a zigzag portion 16 is only one way of unbalancing the
arms so that the standing-wave patterns thereof are not opposite in
the two arms. The arms can be unbalanced in other ways such as: (1)
terminating one arm in a capacitor and the other arm in an
inductor, (2) adding a fast wave structure such as a series of
ungrounded capacitor elements in series to one arm, (3) replacing
the zigzag structure with any slow wave structure such as (a) a
group of ungrounded inductive elements in series, (b) a toothed
structure, and (c) different dielectric loading than the other arm,
or (4) lengthening one arm (the additional arm length may be coiled
or spiraled inside the antenna cone). It has been found that
unbalancing by lengthening one arm produces matched input
impedances at frequencies lower than those obtainable with the use
of the zigzag portion. Other suitable ways of unbalancing the two
arms of the antenna will be visualized by those skilled in the art
and accordingly the invention is not limited to the specific
embodiment shown or the other examples given but contemplates all
unbalanced structures within the scope of the appended claims.
In one operational embodiment of the invention the antenna was
designed to radiate efficiently over the band from 200 to 600 MHz
by making the cone angle .theta.13.2.degree., the height of the
cone 26 inches, the diameter of the base thereof 83/8inches, and
the diameter of the truncated upper base thereof 23/8inches. The
input voltage standing wave ratio was less than 2 to 1 relative to
50 ohms over the entire band. The volume of the antenna cone was
0.003 cubic wavelength at the longest wavelength of the band, a
reduction to less than 8 percent of the volume of a corresponding
balanced arm conical spiral antenna. This dramatic reduction in
size is possible because of the unbalancing slow wave zigzag
portion 16.
FIGS. 4 and 5
FIGS. 4 and 5 show flat layout views of the individual radiating
arms A and B and the tables below give dimensions in inches from
the reference points X to the other lettered reference points A to
T. On a flat pattern, the angle between adjacent reference lines in
the group XA to XT in FIGS. 4 and 5 was 6.degree. 57.5'. The actual
dimensions of the radiating elements and the details of the zigzag
portion are not critical and the diagrams of FIGS. 4 and 5 and the
tables below are given as an example of one optimized design of a
preferred embodiment of the antenna.
FIG. 4 FIG. 5
__________________________________________________________________________
A 1 10.75 A 2 -- A1 10.75 A2 -- B1 11.60 B2 10.42 B1 11.60 B2 10.42
C1 12.50 C2 11.32 C1 12.50 C2 11.32 D1 13.50 D2 12.32 D1 13.50 D2
12.32 E1 14.58 E2 13.40 E1 14.58 E2 13.40 F1 15.72 F2 14.54 F1
15.72 F2 14.54 G1 16.96 G2 15.72 G1 16.96 G2 15.72 H1 18.30 H2
16.96 H1 18.30 H2 16.96 J1 19.75 J2 18.30 J1 19.75 J2 18.30 K1
21.30 K2 19.75 K1 21.30 K2 19.75 L1 23.00 L2 21.30 L1 23.00 L2
21.30 M1 24.85 M2 23.00 M1 24.85 M2 23.00 N1 26.80 N2 24.85 N1
26.80 N2 24.85 P1 28.90 P2 26.80 P1 28.90 P2 26.80 R1 31.10 R2
28.80 R1 30.08 R2 28.90 S1 33.50 S 2 31.10 S1 32.28 S2 31.10 T1
36.10 T2 33.50 T1 34.50 T2 33.50
__________________________________________________________________________
Table of distances in inches from reference point X to reference
points A1 to T2 in FIGS. 4 and 5.
FIG. 6
According to the invention, radio equipment may be placed within
the dielectric support 14 if a suitable isolating metal shield 15,
smaller than the dielectric support 14, but corresponding in
configuration thereto, is provided within support 14. The metal
shield 15 has no significant electrical function in the operation
of the antenna; however it should not be spaced close to the
radiating arms in order to minimize loading. Within the metal
shield 15 can be placed a transmitter 20 which is excited by an
input 22.
The unbalanced (coaxial) output 24 of transmitter 20 is converted
to a balanced output by a balun 26. Balun 26 can be formed from a
coaxial cable in which a slot in the outer conductor thereof widens
gradually until the inner and outer conductors form a balanced
two-wire line such as shown at 28.
The dielectric cone 14 may be made of any material which has a low
dielectric loss, such as fiber glass. A streamlining apex portion
30 for the dielectric support 14 is shown in FIG. 6. Portion 30 has
no electrical function and can be formed of the same material as
support 14 or can be metallic, if desired.
Obviously the antenna of the invention can be formed as part of the
nose of any airborne, surface, or undersea vehicle.
While there has been described what is at present considered to be
the preferred embodiment of the invention it will be apparent that
various modifications and other embodiments thereof will occur to
those skilled in the art within the scope of the invention.
Accordingly, it is desired that the scope of the invention be
limited by the appended claims only.
* * * * *