U.S. patent number 3,631,499 [Application Number 05/064,520] was granted by the patent office on 1971-12-28 for electrically small double-loop antenna with distributed loading and impedance matching.
Invention is credited to Edwin M. Turner.
United States Patent |
3,631,499 |
Turner |
December 28, 1971 |
ELECTRICALLY SMALL DOUBLE-LOOP ANTENNA WITH DISTRIBUTED LOADING AND
IMPEDANCE MATCHING
Abstract
Relatively uniform impedance and broad bandwidth is obtained in
a double-loop electrically small antenna by transformer coupling in
phase opposition the ends of the loops. For receiving,
amplification may be added within the loops to increase the
effective electrical output of the antenna. The electrical output
of the antenna may be remotely controlled at the receiver, to
preclude overloading the receiver, by changing the potential
supplied the amplifier over the conventional signal transmission
line connecting the receiver to the antenna.
Inventors: |
Turner; Edwin M. (Dayton,
OH) |
Family
ID: |
22056541 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/064,520 |
Filed: |
August 17, 1970 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
343/701; 343/744;
455/291; 343/742; 343/860 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H01Q
9/28 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H01Q
9/04 (20060101); H01Q 9/28 (20060101); H01q
011/12 () |
Field of
Search: |
;343/701,742,744,860,803,804,858,856,908 ;325/373 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Lieberman; Eli
Claims
I claim:
1. An electrically small broadband antenna having output
connections of a nominal high output impedance of 300 ohms and of a
nominal low output impedance of 70 ohms for connecting to
respective impedance transmission lines comprising:
a. a right-hand open-loop conductive element having an upper
terminating end and a lower terminating end;
b. A left-hand open-loop conductive element having an upper
terminating end and a lower terminating end;
c. a radiofrequency transformer having a high-impedance winding and
a low-impedance winding with a turns ratio between the said winding
of approximately 2.1 to 1;
d. means for connecting the high-impedance winding between the said
lower terminating ends of the said right- and left-hand open loops
and the low-impedance winding between the said upper terminating
ends of the said right- and left-hand open loops;
e. means cooperating with the said high-impedance transformer
winding for connecting a high-impedance transmission line; and
f. means cooperating with the said low-impedance transformer
winding for connecting a low-impedance transmission line.
2. An electrically small antenna for operation over the frequency
band of approximately 50 MegaHertz to approximately 225 MegaHertz
having a nominal 300-ohm output impedance and a nominal 70-ohm
output impedance comprising:
a. a dielectric printed circuit board having:
1. an approximately 5/8 -inch-wide copper strip forming a
right-hand open-loop conductive element having a height of
approximately 131/2 inches and a width of approximately 7 inches,
and an upper terminating end and a lower terminating end, and
2. an approximately 5/8 -inch-wide copper strip forming a left-hand
open-loop conductive element having a height of approximately 131/2
inches and a width of approximately 7 inches, and an upper
terminating end and a lower terminating end, the upper and lower
terminating ends being juxtapositioned the respective said upper
and lower terminating ends of the said right-hand open loop;
b. a radiofrequency transformer suitable for operation over the
frequency from approximately 50 MegaHertz to approximately 225
MegaHertz, having a first winding and a secondary winding with a
turns ratio between the windings of approximately 2.1 to 1;
c. means for connecting the said first winding of the transformer
between the said upper terminating ends of the said loops and the
said second winding of the transformer between the said lower
terminating ends of the said loops;
d. means connecting with the said first windings for providing an
output; and
e. means connecting with the said second winding for providing an
output.
3. An electrically small receiving antenna for operation over the
frequency band of approximately 50 MegaHertz to approximately 225
MegaHertz and providing an output to a transmission line
comprising:
a. a dielectric printed circuit board having,
1. a right-hand open-loop conductive element having an upper
terminating end and a lower terminating end, and
2. a left-hand open-loop conductive element having an upper
terminating end and a lower terminating end;
b. a radiofrequency transformer suitable for operation over the
frequency from 50 MegaHertz to 225 MegaHertz, having a first
winding and a second winding;
c. means for connecting the first winding of the said transformer
between the upper terminating ends of the said right- and left-hand
open-loop elements;
d. a radiofrequency amplifier having an input and an output and
suitable for operation over at least the frequency range from 50
MegaHertz to 225 MegaHertz;
e. means for connecting the input of the said radiofrequency
amplifier with the said lower terminating ends of the said right-
and left-hand open-loop elements;
f. means for connecting the output of the said radiofrequency
amplifier to the second winding of the said transformer; and
g. means cooperating with the said amplifier for providing an
output to the said transmission line.
4. The antenna as claimed in claim 3 wherein the said right-hand
open-loop element and the said left-hand open-loop element contain
lumped loading.
5. The antenna as claimed in claim 3 wherein the said right-hand
open-loop element and the said left-hand open-loop element contain
distributed loading.
6. The antenna as claimed in claim 3 wherein the said right-hand
open-loop element is approximately a 5/8 -inch-wide copper strip
having a height of approximately 131/2 inches and a width of
approximately 7 inches and the said left-hand open-loop element is
approximately a 5/8 -inch-wide copper strip having a height of
approximately 131/2 inches and a width of approximately 7
inches.
7. The antenna as claimed in claim 6 wherein the said transformer
has a turns ratio of approximately 2.1 to 1.
8. The antenna as claimed in claim 7 wherein the said amplifier has
a gain of less than 25 db.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The field of the invention is in the electromagnetic antenna art
and particularly in the art of antennas that are electrically
small.
A longstanding and continuing goal in the antenna art has been, and
is, to provide effective antennas that require the least amount of
physical space. For many years it has been common practice to add a
loading coil to a wire or rod antenna to achieve radiation and
reception at frequencies that would normally require a much longer
radiating element. That is, the antenna is electrically small for
the frequencies at which it is utilized. Such antennas have a
relatively narrow bandwidth, and to achieve broadband operation
many elements are required and serious discontinuities occur
between the tuned elements.
A small single antenna that will operate effectively over a
relative broadband of frequencies is highly desirable with any
variable frequency or tunable transmitter or receiver system. For
instance, it is very beneficial to military vehicles whether they
be airplanes, tanks, or submarines to have the smallest number and
smallest size antennas that are feasible to maintain effective
communication. Commercially, the television antenna is a typical
example of the desirability and need of an effective small,
mechanically simple, and broadband antenna.
While admittedly the antenna of this invention, when it is used
alone without internal amplification, is not as efficient as a
tuned dipole antenna at the particular frequency to which the
dipole is tuned, the antenna of this invention does provide a
bandwidth that would require a vast multitude of tuned dipoles; and
it provides this bandwidth without discontinuities in the operating
characteristics that a plurality of individual tuned elements
inherently possess. Typical examples of prior art broadband
antennas are contained in U.S. Pat. No. 3,241,148, "End Loaded
Planar Spiral Antenna," issued to L. W. Lechtrack and U.S. Pat. No.
3,167,775, "Multi-Band Antenna Formed of Closely Spaced Folded
Dipoles of Increasing Length," issued to R. Guertler.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention provides an electrically small broadband antenna that
has relatively uniform impedance and broad directional
characteristics. The antenna has two nominal output impedances such
as 300 ohms and 70 ohms for matching to conventional high-impedance
and low-impedance transmission lines. Amplification within the
electrical circuit of the antenna provides a greatly increased
electrical output from the antenna for receiving usage. To prevent
overloading of the receiver input circuit, the gain of the
amplifier, internal the electrical circuitry of the antenna, may be
controlled from the receiver over the conventional signal
transmission line.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
FIG. 1 is a pictorial view of the electromagnetic radiating and
receiving elements of an embodiment of the invention employing
distributed loading;
FIG. 2 is a pictorial view of the electromagnetic radiating and
receiving elements of an embodiment of the invention employing
lumped loading;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a passive embodiment of the
invention using the structure shown in FIG. 1;
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a passive embodiment of the
invention using the structure shown in FIG. 2;
FIG. 5 is a Smith Chart plot showing the changes in impedance of
the system shown in FIG. 3 with changes in operating frequency when
measured from the lower terminals;
FIG. 6 is a Smith Chart plot showing the changes in impedance with
changes in operating frequency when the transformer shown in FIG. 3
is incorrectly poled;
FIG. 7 is a Smith Chart plot showing the change in impedance of the
system shown in FIG. 3 with changes in frequency as measured from
the upper terminals;
FIG. 8 is a Smith Chart plot showing the change in impedance of the
system shown in FIG. 4 with changes in operating frequency;
FIG. 9 is a typical efficiency vs. frequency plot of an embodiment
of the invention shown in FIGS. 3 and 4;
FIG. 10 is a block-schematic diagram of an embodiment of the
invention having distributed loading and internal
amplification;
FIG. 11 is a block-schematic diagram of an embodiment of the
invention having lumped loading and internal amplification;
FIG. 12 is a schematic diagram of a typical amplifier that may be
used with the embodiments of the invention shown in FIGS. 10 and
11;
FIG. 13 is a block-schematic diagram showing the circuitry for the
remote control of the gain of the amplifier shown in FIG. 12.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
For ease of description and understanding, the embodiments of the
invention described in detail will refer to antennas for the
frequency band of approximately 50 MegaHertz to approximately 225
MegaHertz. Obviously, for higher bands of frequency the antenna may
be proportionally scaled down and for lower frequency increased in
size proportionally. Thus an embodiment of the radiating and
receiving elements of the antenna using distributed loading for
operation over the foregoing enumerated frequency band is shown
approximately to scale in FIG. 1.
The general configuration is that of a double open loop comprising
a right-hand element 1 and a left-hand element 2. The elements are
formed using conventional printed circuit techniques on dielectric
board 3. One-sixteenth-inch dielectric board having 1 -mil copper
conductor has been found to be very satisfactory. The dielectric
board should be conventional high-frequency material such as the
military-type G-10, or the commercially available Cinclad C Series
Grade A made by the Cincinnati Milling Machine Company. The G-10
material, while more expensive, has been found to generally be
preferable for outdoor installations. Each loop is approximately
131/2 inches high and approximately 7 inches wide. The largest
dimension across both elements of the antenna is approximately 15
inches, thus the total length of the antenna is considerably less
than a half wavelength at the highest frequency of operation. The
width of the copper elements 1 and 2 is approximately five-eighths
inch and the spacing between the upper terminating ends 31 and 32
of each loop and the lower terminating ends 33 and 34 is
approximately 3 inches. These dimensions are not critical but have
been found to be optimum in conjunction with the further to be
explained circuitry.
An alternative structure having flattened loops and using lumped
loading within the loops is shown approximately to scale in FIG. 2.
This configuration has the advantage of being more compact than
that of FIG. 1 and thus for some space-limited applications is more
suitable. Generally the structure shown in FIG. 1 is preferred due
to its simplicity of construction, and generally preferable
directional characteristics. The dielectric board 4 preferably is
of the same material as mentioned previously and likewise
conventional printed circuit techniques are used to form the loop
elements 5 and 6 and the various length conductors forming the
lumped inductance-capacitance loading elements. The preferred
dimensions for the frequency band of approximately 50 to 225
MegaHertz are an overall length across both loops of approximately
24 inches and a width of approximately 3 inches. These dimensions
are not critical nor are the dimensions of the folded loading
elements. An 18-inch overall length with a 2 -inch width is not
quite as efficient at the lower end of the band, and a 30 by 4
-inch overall size of the loops gives but a very minor improvement
at the low frequencies, thus the 24 by 3 -inch size is generally
preferable.
FIG. 3 shows schematically a passive embodiment using the structure
of FIG. 1. Transformer 7 is a conventional radiofrequency
transformer operable over the enumerated band of frequencies having
windings with nominal impedances of 300 ohms, and 70 ohms. FIG. 4
shows schematically a similar transformer connected to the
structural embodiment shown in FIG. 2. It is to be remembered that
while a conventional 300 ohm to 70 ohm coupling transformer is used
in these embodiments of the invention, that an impedance of 300
ohms looking into one winding of such a transformer is only
obtained when the other winding "sees" 70 ohms, and that the
nominal impedance rating merely defines a turns ratio, that is,
Z.sub.s /Z.sub. p =(N.sub.s /N.sub. p).sup. 2, or N = Z.sub.s
/Z.sub.p
Where Z.sub.s = Impedance connected to secondary winding,
Z.sub.p = Impedance looking into primary winding,
N.sub.s = Turns on secondary,
N.sub.p = Turns on primary, and
N =Turns ratio, secondary to primary.
Thus, for these embodiments it has been found that a conventional
high-frequency transformer having a turns ratio of approximately
2.1 to 1 connected as shown will provide a broadband antenna having
two nominal output impedances suitable for connecting either to a
conventional 300 -ohm twin-lead transmission line or to
conventional 70 -ohm coaxial line. Referring to FIG. 3, by using a
transformer 7 having a turns ratio of approximately 2 on the lower
winding 8 to 1 on the upper winding 9, an output impedance suitable
for connecting to a conventional 300 -ohm line is provided at
terminals 10 and 11; or, if it is desired to use a 70 -ohm
transmission line, connection is made to the upper terminals 12 and
13. Similarly, in FIG. 4 by using the same kind of transformer 14,
a nominal output impedance of 300 ohms is provided at terminals 15
and 16, and a 70 -ohm nominal output impedance is provided at
terminals 17 and 18.
FIG. 5 is a Smith Chart showing a typical output impedance
characteristic over the frequency range of 42 MegaHertz to 460
MegaHertz of the embodiment shown in FIG. 3 as measured at the 300
-ohm connections. The chart is normalized at unity equal to 300
.
The importance of correctly poling the transformer is shown by the
chart of FIG. 6. In obtaining these data the connections from
winding 8 to the loop elements 1 and 2 were reversed. As shown by
the chart this produces an undesirable spread in the impedance
characteristic. It also distorts the directional characteristics
and greatly reduces the efficiency of the antenna. In FIG. 7,
impedance characteristics, normalized to 70, of the antenna of FIG.
3 over the range of 42 MegaHertz to 300 MegaHertz, looking into the
70 -ohm connection, is shown.
The Smith Chart of FIG. 8 is typical of the characteristic
impedance normalized at 300 of the embodiment shown in FIG. 4 as
measured at the 300 -ohm output. Equally satisfactory operation is
obtained at the 70 -ohm output. As in the embodiment shown in FIG.
3, it is important that the transformer be correctly poled.
FIG. 9 is a representative plot showing the efficiencies of the
passive structures shown in FIGS. 3 and 4 over their nominal
operating range of frequencies. The typical efficiencies of an
infinite number of half-wave dipoles each tuned to the particular
operating frequency is indicated by the dashed line 19.
The directional characteristics of the embodiment shown in FIG. 3
is that of an ellipsoid having a major axis in the plane of the
loop elements 1 and 2, centrally located between them, and having
approximately equal minor axes. The directional characteristics of
the embodiment shown in FIG. 4 is a lemniscate of revolution having
its major axis in the plane of the antenna centrally located
between the loops.
The passive antennas such as shown in FIGS. 3 and 4 may be used for
both transmitting and receiving. When an embodiment of the antenna
is used for transmitting, the transformer, obviously, must be
capable of withstanding the particular radiofrequency power
involved.
For receiving use the output of the antennas may be greatly
increased by adding amplification within the circulating currents
of the antennas as shown in FIGS. 10 and 11. It is to be observed
that the amplification is "within" the antenna elements and not
just an amplification of the output signal of the antenna before it
passes into the transmission line as is conventionally done. A
conventional broadband high-frequency amplifier covering the
frequencies involved that has relatively low input and output
impedances may be used. A typical amplifier is shown in FIG. 12.
The amplifier may be electrically placed between the adjacent open
ends of the loops and the transformer on either side of the
transformer. It is connected so as to amplify the signal from the
ends of the loops going to the transformer.
As those practicing this invention will understand, the input and
output impedances of the amplifier should preferably be such as to
essentially provide the desired output impedances at the high- and
low-impedance antenna terminals; that is, conventionally, 300 ohms
and 70 ohms. The phasing of the signals is critical as it is with
the passive structures. The amplifier shown in FIG. 12 effects a
phase reversal, thus the transformer must be poled opposite to the
way it was connected for the passive embodiments. When using
amplifiers that have their output in phase with their input, poling
of the transformer as in the passive embodiments, is used.
The amplifier may have fixed gain and be completely self-contained
in the antenna structure. Embodiments of this type have the
advantage of the conventional dual output impedances of 70 ohms and
300 ohms readily available by connecting the transmission line
directly across the respective transformer windings. They, however,
have the disadvantage of providing unnecessary and perhaps
excessive amplification of already strong signals with the
resultant likelihood of overloading the input circuits of the
receiver when it is tuned to the frequency of a strong signal. It
has thus been found to be generally desirable to control the gain
of the amplifier in the antenna from the receiver location. With
conventional transistor amplifiers as shown in FIG. 12 this may
readily be done by controlling the supply voltage on the amplifier
as shown in FIG. 13. Referring to both FIGS. 12 and 13, the
transmission line from the receiver is connected to the amplifier
at terminals 20 and 21. The direct current supply voltage for the
amplifier is also carried over the conventional transmission line
from the remote control position at the receiver to the amplifier.
Inductance 23 prevents the power source from shorting out the
radiofrequency signals and capacitors 24 and 25 keep the direct
current out of the receiver input. Blocking capacitor 26 prevents
the direct current from flowing in the antenna transformer winding.
Terminals 27 and 28 connect the amplifier output to the transformer
and terminals 29 and 30 connect the signals at the adjacent ends of
the loops to the input of the amplifier. Conventional
variable-voltage transistor power supply 31 may thus be used to
adjust the gain of the amplifier so that larger gains may be used
with weak signals and the gain reduced for strong signals.
It has been found that generally the maximum amount of gain before
oscillation takes place, is approximately 25 db. For embodiments
using fixed-gain amplifiers, 20 db. of gain is the preferred amount
of gain to reasonably preclude any oscillation taking place, In
embodiments having remote control at the receiver the maximum
amount of gain before oscillation takes place may be utilized for
the reception of weak signals by using amplifiers having a maximum
gain of approximately 30 db.
* * * * *