U.S. patent number 3,629,952 [Application Number 05/089,744] was granted by the patent office on 1971-12-28 for airfoil web dryer.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Overly, Inc.. Invention is credited to Wm. F. Overly, Kenneth J. Pagel.
United States Patent |
3,629,952 |
Overly , et al. |
December 28, 1971 |
AIRFOIL WEB DRYER
Abstract
An airfoil nozzle is disposed adjacent the moving web to be
dried and is constructed with a substantially flat planular guide
surface trailing the nozzle, facing the web and substantially
parallel thereto.
Inventors: |
Overly; Wm. F. (Winneconne,
WI), Pagel; Kenneth J. (Neenah, WI) |
Assignee: |
Overly, Inc. (Neenah,
WI)
|
Family
ID: |
22219373 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/089,744 |
Filed: |
November 16, 1970 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
817834 |
Apr 21, 1969 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
34/641;
226/196.1; 242/615.11 |
Current CPC
Class: |
D21F
5/00 (20130101); B41F 23/0426 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B41F
23/00 (20060101); B41F 23/04 (20060101); D21F
5/00 (20060101); B65h 017/32 () |
Field of
Search: |
;226/97,7 ;302/29
;34/156,160 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Knowles; Allen N.
Parent Case Text
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
This application constitutes a continuation-in-part of U.S.
application Ser. No. 817,834, filed Apr. 21, 1969 and which is
copending herewith.
Claims
We claim:
1. An airfoil web dryer comprising one or more airfoil nozzles
disposed on at least one side of a moving web with the nozzle slot
disposed to discharge the air at an air velocity in excess of 3,300
feet per minute, with a Reynolds' number of from about 4,000 to
8,000 and said nozzle having a substantially flat face generally
parallel to the web to provide turbulent flow of the air between
the face and the web, and an L/D ratio within the range of about 40
to 90 where L is the dimension of the flat face in the direction of
air flow and D is the width of the nozzle slot.
2. The construction of claim 1 wherein the L/D ratio is
approximately 60 and the air velocity is approximately 14,000 feet
per minute as it enters the space between said face and the web,
with a Reynolds' number of approximately from 5,000 to 7,000.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to an airfoil web dryer wherein an airfoil
nozzle is employed to direct a flow of air in contact with a moving
web to be dried.
The practice in the paper industry and also in the printing
industry is to avoid physical contact with the wet paper or with
the fresh ink by anything other than the drying air. With a web
moving at several thousand feet per minute the drying air impinging
thereon must serve to stabilize the web and at the same time
provide adequate heat transfer to effect the desired pick up
moisture from the web.
It has generally been assumed that laminar flow of air adjacent the
web provides the greatest stability for the web and nozzles have
generally been designed to provide a laminar flow of air in a
direction parallel to the movement of the web.
Airfoil nozzles are particularly adapted to this purpose as
illustrated in the copending application Ser. No. 817,834 referred
to above.
Also, as recognized in said application there is a need for a
turbulent airflow to provide the needed drying, and according to
the application, this turbulent flow is obtained in the system
there disclosed by the use of air discharge velocities in excess of
3,300 feet per minute and may be enchanced by employing either an
interrupted surface or supplemental jet.
No one heretofore has recognized that it is possible by employing a
substantially flat extension of the airfoil surface for a distance
generally correlated to the nozzle dimensions to obtain an extended
turbulent airflow in contact with the web and which greatly
increases the heat transfer without increasing the power
required.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is based upon the recognition that maximum
drying efficiencies may be obtained for a given power input to the
dryer, by employing a series of airfoil nozzles on one or both
sides of the web, each of the nozzles having an extended flat
planular surface substantially parallel to the web trailing the
nozzle in the direction of web movement, and which surface extends
for a distance approximately 60 times the width of the nozzle slot
where the nozzle slot width is in excess of about 0.060 inch and
the air velocity from the nozzle is substantially greater than
3,300 feet per minute and preferably of the order of 15,000 feet
per minute. The Reynolds number should preferably be from about
4,000 to 10,000.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The drawings furnished herewith illustrate the best mode presently
contemplated for carrying out the invention as described
hereinafter.
In the drawings:
FIG. 1 is a schematic top plan view of a dryer with nozzles above
and below the web to be dried;
FIG. 2 is a schematic side elevation of such a dryer;
FIG. 3 is an enlarged section of an airfoil nozzle taken on line
3--3 of FIG. 1 and illustrating the flow of air between it and the
web; and
FIG. 4 is a graph illustrating the power requirements for different
Reynolds numbers and different L/D ratios.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Referring to FIGS. 1 to 3 of the drawing, the web 1 is shown as
traveling horizontally through a drying zone from a roll 2 to a
rewind roll 3 with a plurality of airfoil nozzles 4 disposed above
and below the web.
Each of the nozzles 4 comprises a plenum chamber or body 5
extending across the full width of the web 1, with closed ends and
a central intake duct 6.
The several nozzles 4 may be arranged in any desired spacing, that
shown providing a space between each two adjacent nozzles greater
than the width of a nozzle so that by disposing the nozzles
alternately above and below the web it is possible to control the
web in a series of waves, each extending for the full width of the
web and avoid direct interference between the air flows impinging
the opposite sides of the web.
The body or plenum chamber 5 of each airfoil nozzle 4 is shown as
of substantially rectangular section with a discharge orifice in
the form of a slot 7 extending for the full length of the body
along one corner thereof.
The slot 7 is formed between an inwardly curved foil edge flange 8
of the face side 9 of body 5 and an inwardly inclined angular foil
plate 10 constituting the adjacent edge portion of the
corresponding side 11 of the body 5.
The palate 10 is generally tangential to the curved surface of foil
flange 8, disregarding the space of slot 7 therebetween.
The face 9 of each body 5 is flat and extends parallel to the
general plane of web 1 with a space 12 therebetween generally
corresponding to the width of nozzle slot 7.
The optimum ratio of the total trailing length of the flat face 9
in the direction opposite to web movement, to the slot width, to
obtain favorable drying of the web with a minimum of power and with
air velocities of the order of 15,000 feet per minute is generally
approximately 60.
The practical width of slot 7 which also corresponds generally to
the space 12 should be within the range of 0.04 inch to 0.125
inch.
The practical horsepower required to provide the necessary flow of
air generally ranges from about 0.3 to 0.8 horsepower per square
foot of the web in the drying zone.
In general within practical limits the higher the temperature of
the air from the nozzle the lower the horsepower required for a
given velocity of airflow in contact with the web but the higher
the horsepower required for a given drying effect.
Also in general in the operating range of the system the greater
the length of the flat face 9 in the direction of web movement for
a given slot width the less horsepower required for a given drying
action.
The air discharging through the nozzle slot 7 flows in a laminar
flow along and following the curved surface of foil edge flange 8
until it reaches the flat face 9 of the plenum chamber 5.
The air continues in the turbulent flow between and in contact with
the face 9 and web 1 in a direction opposed to the direction of web
movement through the drying zone.
After the air reaches the edge of face 9 opposite the curved foil
flange 8 it flows away from web 1 losing its pressure and is
exhausted from the dryer by any suitable means, not shown.
The turbulent flow of air in contact with the web 1 and the face 9
effects a heat transfer to the web resulting in evaporation of
moisture from the web at a rapid rate.
In general, the power required for a given heat transfer or drying
effect will depend upon the Reynolds number indicating turbulence
and the L/D ratio where L is the length of face 9 in the direction
of web movement and D is the distance between face 9 and the web 1.
Formulas for these may be derived according to the teaching in the
college instruction book entitled "Transport Phenomena" by R. Byron
Bird, Warren E. Stewart and Edwin N. Lightfoot, and published in
1960 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. of New York.
Referring to FIG. 4 of the drawings, the graph plots the L/D ratio
as the abscissa and the mass flow rate or power requirement as the
ordinate for two Reynolds number curves A and B, giving the range
considered most practical for employment of the invention. Curve A
is for a Reynolds number of 10,000 and curve B is for a Reynolds
number of 5,000.
The power number expressed as 10.sup.-.sup.5 .times.P* is a
convenient measure of power requirement which is derived from an
energy balance as taught in Chapter 13 of the above book, and from
a power function expressed in terms of the air velocity and
density, the dimensions of the nozzle and web, and a constant heat
coefficient. In this number:
In the above equation:
L = length of foil surface 9 in direction of web movement,
D = width of nozzle slot 7, and
[1-e.sup.- ].sup.3 is a logarithmic function in which .phi.
represents the units of heat transfer per nozzle and e is a
logarithmic base.
From the curves it can be determined that the most favorable
conditions for low power consumption is with an L/D ratio between
about 40 and 100 with a Reynolds number generally below 10,000. For
a 4,000 Reynolds number the lowest power is needed with an L/D
ratio of about 65.
It is well to keep below 3.00 as a power number since efficiency
drops rapidly with increasing power consumption. Stated in
horsepower consumed per square foot of web in the dryer it is
considered good practice to stay within 0.3 to 0.8 horsepower per
square foot.
In the airfoil nozzle illustrated, there will be a loss in velocity
of air immediately after leaving the slot 7 amounting to about
1,000 feet per minute for each one-sixteenth inch of travel along
the curved foil until the air reaches the space 12 between the web
and the flat surface 9 where it becomes turbulent and continues to
the opposite side of the body 5.
The turbulent air impacts the web 1 and gives up heat in picking up
moisture from the web. In this process the air cools and loses some
velocity as it moves toward discharge from space 12.
The optimum air velocity at the nozzle slot 7 is generally in
excess of 14,000 feet per minute although if other conditions are
favorable an air velocity as low as 3,300 feet per minute has been
satisfactory.
The exact slot width is largely a matter of practicality
considering the L/D ratio needed and the air velocities
available.
In constructing a dryer, certain factors are determined early, such
as the speed of the web, the approximate amount of moisture to be
removed from it, the general space requirements of the dryer, the
available horsepower, air velocities available and the facility for
heating the air to a desired operating temperature.
Given the above approximate initial determinations, it is possible
to determine by suitable formula the approximate numbers and size
of air nozzles needed, the Reynolds number most favorable, the
distance L for face 9 and the width D of the slot.
Various modes of carrying out the invention are contemplated as
being within the scope of the following claims particularly
pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which is
regarded as the invention
* * * * *