U.S. patent number 3,626,457 [Application Number 05/166,900] was granted by the patent office on 1971-12-07 for sentinel control for cutoff apparatus.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Koppers Company, Inc.. Invention is credited to Lorenz K. E. Duerr, Charles D. Nitchie.
United States Patent |
3,626,457 |
Duerr , et al. |
December 7, 1971 |
SENTINEL CONTROL FOR CUTOFF APPARATUS
Abstract
A sentinel control in cutoff apparatus having rotatable cutting
means for cutting sheets of uniform length from a moving web of
material fed to the apparatus to prevent the rotational velocity
(revolutions or cuts per second) of the cutting means for exceeding
a predetermined maximum or threshold limit rotational velocity and
thereby prevent possible damage and destruction to the cutoff
apparatus caused by the heavy inertia forces imposed upon the
apparatus when operated at velocities in excess of maximum desired
limit.
Inventors: |
Duerr; Lorenz K. E. (Coram,
NY), Nitchie; Charles D. (Ruxton, MD) |
Assignee: |
Koppers Company, Inc.
(N/A)
|
Family
ID: |
21778421 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/166,900 |
Filed: |
March 5, 1970 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
83/74; 83/76;
83/311 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B23D
36/0041 (20130101); Y10T 83/148 (20150401); Y10T
83/159 (20150401); Y10T 83/4737 (20150401) |
Current International
Class: |
B23D
36/00 (20060101); B23s 025/12 () |
Field of
Search: |
;83/74,75,76,311 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Meister; James M.
Claims
We claim:
1. A sentinel control to impose a threshold limit on the number of
revolutions negotiated by rotatable cutting means in a cutoff
apparatus for cutting sheets of uniform length from a moving web of
material fed to the apparatus in a given time comprising circuit
control means connected to operate a variable speed motor to drive
the moving web of material to the cutoff apparatus and to drive,
through adjustable power transmission means, said cutting means, a
sensing circuit having sensing means associated with said cutting
means to operatively detect when said cutting means exceeds said
threshold limit, and switching means connected in said sensing
circuit and responsive to said sensing means when made operative to
override said circuit control means to control the speed of said
motor and prevent said motor from driving said rotatable cutting
means in excess of said threshold limit.
2. The sentinel control of claim 1 characterized in that said
threshold limit negotiated by said rotatable cutting means is 3
revolutions per second.
3. The sentinel control of claim 1 characterized by centrifugal
switch means comprising said sensing means and connected to be
driven from said cutting means and responsive when said rotatable
cutting means is driven in excess of said threshold limit to
operate said switching means to override said circuit control
means.
4. The sentinel control of claim 3 characterized in that said
switching means comprises a relay in said sensing circuit and
having a normally open contact, said circuit control means includes
a reversible adjusting motor to control the speed of said variable
drive motor and connected by two supply lines and a common line to
a power source, a normally open switch in each of said supply lines
to operate said reversible adjusting motor in a forward or reverse
direction, said relay contact connected across one of said normally
open switches.
5. The sentinel control of claim 1 characterized by means for
producing a pulse signal indicative of each coincidental cutoff by
said cutting means comprising said sensing means, said sensing
circuit responsive to said pulse signals when the latter within
said given time are in excess of said threshold limit to operate
said switching means to control the speed of said variable speed
motor to prevent said motor from driving said rotatable cutting
means in excess of said threshold limit.
6. The sentinel control of claim 5 characterized in that said pulse
signal producing means are proximity switches associated with the
operation of said cutting means to produce a pulse upon each
complete revolution negotiated by said cutting means.
7. The sentinel control of claim 5 characterized in that said
switching means comprises a relay in said sensing circuit and
having a normally open contact, said circuit control means includes
a reversible adjusting motor to control the speed of said variable
drive motor and connected by two supply lines and a common line to
a power source, a normally open switch in each of said supply lines
to operate said reversible adjusting motor in a forward or reverse
direction, said relay contact connected across one of said normally
open switches.
8. The sentinel control of claim 5 characterized in that said
switching means comprises a silicon controlled rectifier with its
gate connected to said sensing circuit, said circuit control means
includes a reversible adjusting motor to control the speed of said
variable drive motor and connected by two supply lines and a common
line to a power source, a normally open switch in each of said
supply lines to operated said reversible adjusting motor in a
forward or reverse direction, the anode and cathode of said
controlled rectifier connected across one of said normally open
switches.
9. The sentinel control of claim 1 characterized by cam means
comprising said sensing means and connected to said adjustable
power transmission means for change in sheet length, said circuit
control means includes a motor control system wherein there is
provided an exciter generator for controlling the speed of said
variable speed motor through the generator shunt field to control
the excitation of said generator, a plurality of variable
resistances connected in series with said generator shunt field,
said switching means consisting of a plurality of limit switches
positioned adjacent said cam means and each having a normally
closed contact connected in parallel with one of said variable
resistances to normally shunt the latter, said cam means operative
on selected of said limit switches to change the shunting effect of
said generator shunt field to control the speed of said motor and
prevent said motor from driving said rotatable cutting means in
excess of said threshold limit.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to a control system for preventing
the operation of cutting means in cutoff apparatus in excess of a
desired speed level measured in revolutions per second of the
cutting means.
The employment of cutoff apparatus of the type herein disclosed is
well known in the art. Such apparatus can be generally classified
as processing apparatus and is used to cut selected sheet lengths
from a continuous web of material as the moving web of material is
fed into the cutoff apparatus.
Examples of such apparatus and control systems for preselecting the
desired sheet lengths to be uniformly severed by such apparatus are
disclosed in Drenning et al. 3,176,557 (83-76); Sterns et al.
3,181,403 (83-76); Paterson 3,195,385, (83-76); Neely 3,215,015
(83-363); Sterns et al. 3,267,781 (83-37); Rubinstein 3,355,973
(83-76); and Nido, patent application Ser. No. 848,469, filed Aug.
8, 1969.
In setting cutoff apparatus control systems to cut uniform sheet
lengths from a moving web of material, such as, corrugated
paperboard, these control systems are susceptible to operating the
rotatable cutting means in the cutoff apparatus in excess of
desirable rotational velocity limit as measured by revolutions (or
cuts) made by the cutting means in a given time, such as a
second.
If the cutting means, usually in the form of a pair of large
rotatably synchronous cutting knives wherein the knife blades meet
for shearing engagement for each revolution thereof, are operated
in excess of the acceptable designed rotational velocity limit, the
cutoff apparatus may be damaged by the tremendous inertial forces
built into such apparatus, particularly when cutting certain
prescribed sheet lengths, such as, for example, below sheet lengths
of 60 inches. It is believed that one of the major costs today in
repair of such cutoff apparatus is due to continuously operating
such apparatus in excess of the designed limits of operation.
The inertial forces of the knives in cutoff apparatus of this type
are very extensive. Power transmission means, which includes a
variable speed transmission and a knife cycling mechanism driven by
a variable speed motor, are designed to withstand the inertial
forces developed by the rotating knives. As is well known in the
art, the cycling mechanism is designed to bring equality in the
rotational velocity of the knives with the lineal velocity of the
moving web of material at the time of cutoff so that perfect
shearing engagement (rather than ripping or tearing) )is made by
the pair of knives upon cutoff. Approximately 20 times more torque
is developed by the cycling mechanism when accelerating and
decelerating the rotational velocity of the knives to bring about
the above mentioned equality.
Thus, the inertial forces in the cutoff apparatus of this nature
are of such a magnitude that when the apparatus is operated for
extended periods of time over the acceptable speed limit, the
apparatus literally is shaken apart eventually opening the door to
possible self-destruction and final breakdown.
It is the common practice in the corrugated paperboard industry as
well as other such processing type industries to post on the cutoff
control system panel a table of safe operating speeds with
corresponding sheet lengths so that the operator will be informed
as to acceptable rotational velocity limits of the cutoff apparatus
for a given sheet length. However, due to inadvertence or pressure
placed upon the processing plant to meet order commitments on time,
the cutoff apparatus is too often operated at speeds in the excess
of the acceptable maximum or established threshold limit eventually
bring about a breakdown of the apparatus and shut down of the
plant's operation until repairs can be made by the manufacturer of
the cutoff apparatus.
The present disclosure is directed to sentinel controls to
automatically prevent the operation of such cutoff apparatus in
excess of the acceptable maximum or threshold limit of
operation.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The chief objective of this invention is the provision of a
sentinel control to impose a maximum or threshold limit on the
number of revolutions (cuts) per second made by a pair of rotating
knives in a cutoff apparatus designed for cutting sheets of uniform
length from a moving web of material fed to the apparatus. In this
manner, the control will automatically prevent personnel from
operating the cutoff apparatus in excess of the design speed
tolerances of the apparatus. For example, when the sheet length
selection control of the cutoff apparatus is adjusted for cutting
sheet lengths of 30 inches, the designed tolerances of the
apparatus may be such to limit its speed of processing the moving
web of material at a maximum of 400 feet per minute or a little
over 61/2 feet per second. On the other hand, a 40 inch sheet may
be safely cut at 500 feet per minute. Anything in excess of 50
inches may be safely cut at a maximum speed, such as, for example,
650 feet per minute.
It has been generally found that as a safety factor, the rotational
velocity of the cutting knives should not exceed 3 cuts
(revolutions) per second, particularly when the moving web of
material is moving at a rate of 100 to 500 feet per minute.
In controlling the operation of cutoff apparatus of the type
referred to herein, a main drive motor, which is operative at
different selected speeds, provides for both (a) the lineal
velocity of the moving web of material to be processed, and (b)
through adjustable power transmission means, the rotational
velocity of the cutoff knives.
It should be noted from all of the foregoing that the revolutions
or cuts made in any given time period by the cutoff knives is a
function of the desired uniform sheet length to be cut and the
velocity of the moving web of material fed into the cutoff
apparatus. By the same token, the desired sheet length to be cut
from the continuous web of material to be processed is a function
of the number of revolutions or cuts to be made by the cutoff
apparatus in a given time period and the velocity of the moving web
of material fed into the cutoff apparatus. Thus, the sentinel
control embodiments herein disclosed are capable of either (a)
automatically detecting or measuring cuts made in any given time
period by the cutoff knives, or (b) automatically detecting the
desired sheet length to be cut from the continuous web of material
to be processed, and thereby control, through the operational speed
of the main drive motor, the velocity of the moving web of material
fed into the cutoff apparatus. This latter function, again, has a
direct bearing on what maximum velocity will be permitted by the
rotating cutoff knives. Thus, the end result is the same --
limiting the maximum number of revolutions per second permitted by
rotatable cutting means for a given sheet length.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Other objects and advantages appear hereinafter in the following
description and claims.
The accompanying drawings show, for the purpose of exemplification
without limiting the invention or the claims thereto, certain
practical embodiments illustrating the principles of this invention
wherein:
FIG. 1 shows a sentinel control utilizing a speed sensing device
for detecting the number of cuts (revolutions) made by the cutoff
apparatus knives in a given time period and thereby controlling the
circuit control means of the main drive motor to prevent the
rotatable cutting knives from exceeding a maximum rotational
velocity.
FIG. 2a shows a modified form of the sentinel control of FIG. 1
utilizing a speed sensing device of the digitizer type to detect
the number of cuts made by the cutoff apparatus knives in a given
time period and thereby controlling the circuit control means of
the main drive motor to prevent the rotatable cutting knives from
exceeding a maximum rotational velocity.
FIG. 2b graphically demonstrates the normal operation of the
sentinel control of FIG. 2a when the velocity of the cutoff
apparatus knives has not exceeded the acceptable maximum or
threshold limit.
FIG. 2c graphically demonstrates the operation of the sentinel
control of FIG. 2a when the velocity of the cutoff apparatus knives
has exceeded the maximum or threshold limit whereby the circuit
control means of the main drive motor is responsive to the sentinel
control to decrease the rotational velocity of the cutoff
knives.
FIG. 3 shows a sentinel control utilizing a sensing device in the
form of a cam for detecting selected sheet lengths which is
operative on the sentinel circuit of the circuit control means of
the main drive motor to prevent the rotatable cutting knives from
exceeding the maximum or threshold rotational velocity.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Cutoff apparatus of the type herein referred to generally employs
two sets of pairs of cutoff knives, one set being referred to as
the upper cutoff knives and the outer set being referred to as the
lower cutoff knives. Whereas the embodiments as shown in FIGS. 1
and 2a show the sentinel control detection in connection with both
the upper and lower pairs of knives, it should be understood that,
for the sake of simplicity, the description of the control in
reality need only be directed to a sentinel control for one pair of
knives. In this regard, the embodiment shown in FIG. 3 shows the
sentinel control for only one set of pair of cutoff knives. The
foregoing, therefore, also holds true in connection with the
claimed invention.
Reference is now made to the drawings and more particularly to FIG.
1 wherein there is shown a sentinel control for detecting or
measuring the rotational velocity of the cutoff apparatus knives.
The upper knife speed sensing device indicated at 1 is rotatably
driven by means of the belt and pulley arrangement shown at 2,
which, in turn, is driven by the upper shaft 3 driving the upper
rotatable cutoff knives (not shown). The lower knife speed sensing
device 4 is also driven through a pulley and belt arrangement 2 by
means of the lower shaft 5 which is driving the lower cutoff knives
(not shown).
The speed sensing devices 1 and 4 are of the centrifugal switch
type and have a contact element 6 therein which closes upon the
sensing device being driven above a predetermined speed which is
set to be the maximum or threshold limit of the upper and lower
cutoff knives. These contact elements 6 are connected in parallel
and connected to one side of supply source, or L.sub.1 with their
other sides connected to the switching device 7. The switching
device as shown in FIG. 1 is a relay K having a normally open
contact K.sub.1 and a normally closed contact K.sub.2. The other
side of relay K is then connected to the other side of supply
source, or L.sub.2.
The remainder of the circuit shown in FIG. 1 is a portion of the
circuit control means used in connection with the operation of the
main drive motor shown at 8. The main drive motor 8 is a DC motor
capable of being operated at various desirable speeds to drive the
double facer rolls (not shown) that transfer, at a desired lineal
velocity, the moving web of material into the cutoff apparatus.
Also, the main drive motor 8, as shown schematically in FIG. 3,
drives the power transmission means 12 comprising a variable speed
transmission, usually of the Reeves type, and a cycling mechanism,
the latter of which drives the pair of cutoff knives indicated at
10. Thus, the variable speed transmission and cycling mechanism
represented power transmission means 12 capable of being adjusted
to drive the pair of cutoff knives 10 at a desired rotational
velocity in such a manner that this rotational velocity will be
equal to the lineal velocity of the moving web of material fed into
the cutoff knives (indicated at 11 in FIG. 3) at the exact time of
cutoff.
As previously mentioned, the circuit control means for variably
operating the main drive motor 8 includes the circuit as shown in
FIG. 1 which comprises a Variac or auto transformer 13 connected to
a three phase voltage supply P.sub.1, P.sub.2, and P.sub.3, the
output of which, through an AC to DC rectifier 14 can vary the
armature voltage of the main drive motor 8 and thus vary the speed
of operation of the motor. The auto transformer 13 which controls
the motor 8 is in turn, physically controlled by the auto
transformer adjusting motor 15 which is a reversible AC motor.
Motor 15 is provided with supply lines L.sub.1 and L.sub.2, from an
AC supply source, L.sub.2 being the common supply line. Line
L.sub.1 is connected to adjusting motor 15 through line 16 to
operate motor 15 in one direction and is also connected to
adjusting motor 15 by means of line 17 to operate adjusting motor
15 in a opposite or reverse direction. In this manner, the auto
transformer 13 is either driven in one direction or the other in
order to increase or decrease, respective, the voltage on the
armature of motor 8.
Line 16 to adjusting motor 15 is provided with an increase push
button 18 and a normally closed contact K.sub.2. Line 17, on the
other hand, is provided with a decrease push button 20. Decrease
push button 20 is provided with normal closed back contact 20a in
line 16 in order to "override" the operation of the increase push
button 18. Thus, it can be seen that upon operation of decrease
push button 20, contact 20b of push button 20 will complete line 17
to adjusting motor 15 to operate the adjusting motor in the desired
direction and at the same time release contact 20a to open line 16
and prevent the simultaneous operation of adjusting motor 15 in the
opposite direction by attempting to also operate increase push
button 18.
Normally open contact K.sub.1 of relay K of the switching device 7
is connected by means of lines 21 and 22 across normally open
contact 20b of decrease push button 20.
From the foregoing, it can be readily seen that if, for example,
upper shaft 3 driving the pair of upper cutoff knives is driven in
excess of a predetermined maximum number of revolutions (cuts) per
second, contact element 6 of the upper knife sensing device 1 will
be caused to close thereby energizing relay K and closing its
normally open contact K.sub.1 and opening normally closed contact
K.sub.2. The resultant effect is that without actually manually
operating decrease push button 20, contact K.sub.1 brings about the
operation of auto transformer adjusting motor 15 to cause auto
transformer 13 to decrease the voltage supply to the armature of
drive motor 8. Simultaneously, contact K.sub.2 prevents the
increase push button 18 from driving the motor. With the decrease
in speed of motor 8, the rotational speed of the upper pair of
cutting knives will be automatically decreased until the rotational
velocity of the knives through their drive shaft 3 is reduced to
below the maximum or threshold limit of revolutions per second
causing operation of the speed sensing device 1. At this point
contact element 6 of sensing device 1 will open deenergizing relay
K causing the opening of its contact K.sub.1 and, thus, stopping
the operation of adjusting motor 15.
From the foregoing description it can readily be seen that if the
speed of the main drive motor 8 is attempted to be steadily
increased through operation of the increased push button 18, the
speed sensing devices 1 and 4 will limit the permissible level of
operation of motor 8 to the predetermined maximum by speed or
threshold limit operation of the sentinel control which "overrides"
decrease push button 20 by means of the normally open contact
K.sub.1 of relay K being closed.
Reference is now made to the sentinel control of FIG. 2a wherein
the sensing means used in the sensing circuit to detect when the
rotational velocity of the pair of cutting knives exceeds the
maximum or threshold limit desired, are the proximity switches 23
and 24. These proximity switches may be, for example, of the
transducer type. Each of the drive shafts 25 and 26 of the upper
cutoff knives and the lower cutoff knives, respective are provided
with a projection 27 which enters a magnetic field of the proximity
switch upon every revolution of the shafts 25 and 26. Thus, upon
every revolution of either shaft 25 or 26, the contact element 28
of the proximity switches 23 and 24 are closed producing a pulse
which is detected by the sensing circuit.
As shown in FIG. 2a, the proximity switches 23 and 24 are connected
from one side through line 30 to a DC supply source. The other side
of the proximity switches 23 and 24 are respectively connected by
means of lines 31 and 32 to the one shot flip-flop -1 and one shot
flip-flop -2, respectively. Also, lines 31 and 32 are also
respectively connected to one of the inputs of the AND-gates 33 and
34.
The pulses t.sub.P generated by the proximity switches 23 and 24
are used to respectively start the operation of the one shot
flip-flop -1 and one shot flip-flop -2 which are in reality
solid-state timers. As is well known, to those skilled in this art,
the pulses t.sub.P are formed through a shaper circuit to produce a
distinctly discrete "square shaped" pulse shown in FIG. 2b.
Each of these one shot flip-flops are a bistable device possessing
two states, one of which is timed producing an output pulse along
their respective lines 35 and 36. Means are provided in each of the
flip-flops -1 and -2 for adjusting the time duration of the output
pulse, which is designated as t.sub.D. The output pulse t.sub.D is
then directed to the other input of respective AND-gates 33 and 34,
along lines 35 and 36, respectively. In this connection one shot
flip-flop -1 and flip-flop -2 are triggered to produce this timed
output pulse t.sub.D on the negative going edge of the pulses
t.sub.P produced by the proximity switches 23 and 24.
Without proceeding further into the discussion with the operation
of the sensing circuit of FIG. 2a, it can readily be seen that if
either of the AND-gates 33 and 34 are caused to operate to produce
an output on line 37 this output will operate OR-gate 38 to produce
a signal on the input of one shot flip-flop -3. Thus, regardless of
whether the upper pair of cutter knives or the lower pair of cutter
knives are operating at a rotational velocity in excess of that of
the maximum or threshold limit, that is, one pair of rotating
cutoff knives is operating at a faster rotational velocity as
compared to the other pair of cutoff knives, the sensing circuit
will operate to decrease the speed of main drive motor 8 if the
rotational velocity of the faster operating pair of cutoff knives
exceeds the maximum or threshold limit.
The one shot flip-flop -3 is also a bistable device possessing two
states one of which is timed and the timed output of one shot
flip-flop -3 is set to have a timed duration to produce an output
pulse t.sub.S on line 40. The timed interval of pulse t.sub.S is
equal to the time interval of the shafts 25 or 26 necessary to
complete 1 revolution. Thus, it has been found that the threshold
limit of rotational velocity of the pair of cutoff knives should
not usually exceed 3 revolutions (cuts) per second particularly in
connection with sheet lengths less than 60 inches. Thus, the time
duration of the one shot flip-flop -3 output pulse t.sub.S should
be set at 0.33 second, that is, one-third of the time interval
necessary for the cutoff knives to negotiate three revolutions or
one-third of 1 second (0.33 second).
As can be seen upon examination of FIG. 2a the circuit control
means of this figure is identical to that previously described and
shown in connection with FIG. 1 wherein the switching device 7 is
utilized to "override" the decrease push button contact 20b by
means of energizing the relay K to close its normally open contact
K.sub.1 and open normally closed contact K.sub.2 when the
rotational velocity of the cutoff knives 10 has exceeded the
acceptable maximum threshold limit.
Reference will now be made more specifically to the operation of
the sensing circuit of FIG. 2a by using the time diagrams of FIGS.
2b and 2c to illustrate the operation of the one shot flip-flops -1
and -2 in conjunction with their proximity switches 23 and 24 and
respective AND-gates 33 and 34 and also in conjunction with the
operation of flip-flop -3.
As shown in FIG. 2b for any given proximity switch, say, for
example, proximity switch 23 of cutoff drive shaft 25, proximity
switch 23 produces a pulse t.sub.P for each shaft revolution. The
time duration or dwell between the successive pulses generated by
the proximity switches is designated as t.sub.S or t.sub.S +,
representing the condition where the maximum or threshold limit
desired is 3 cuts per second to be made by the rotating pairs of
cutoff knives, and the time duration between the proximity switch
pulses t.sub.P should be equal to or greater than t.sub.S under
normal operation. In the case of a threshold limit of 3 cuts per
second, t.sub.S would normally be equal to 0.33 second.
As can be seen upon viewing FIG. 2b, the one shot flip-flop -1 or
-2 is caused to change state and produce an output pulse T.sub.D
along either line 35 or 36 which pulse is less than the time
duration of t.sub.S. The time duration of one shot flip-flops -1
and -2 output pulse t.sub.D is calculated as follows: if pulse
t.sub.P is the dwell of the proximity switches 23 and 24; pulse
t.sub.D is the time duration or dwell of either one shot flip-flops
-1 and -2; and t.sub.S is the dwell between the proximity switch
pulses t.sub.P, then
T.sub.D = T.sub.S -t.sub.P.
In the case where t.sub.S the dwell between the proximity pulses
t.sub.P, is equal to 0.33 second (3 cuts per second) at the cutoff
knife), then,
t.sub.D =0.33-t.sub.P.
As mentioned previously, the pulse T.sub.D at the output of the one
shot flip-flops -1 and -2 is triggered by the negative going edge
of the proximity switch pulse t.sub.P, as illustrated in FIG. 2b.
As explained above and also illustrated in this figure, the time
duration of pulse t.sub.D is limited to be extinguished before the
next succeeding proximity switch pulse t.sub.P. Therefore,
assuming, as shown in FIG. 2b, that the proximity switch pulses
t.sub.P are separated by sufficient time duration or dwell equal to
at least t.sub.S, there will be no time coincidence of (a) the next
succeeding pulse t.sub.P along either line 31 or 32 to respective
AND-gates 33 and 34 and (b) the timed pulse t.sub.D from the
outputs of the one shot flip-flops -1 and -2 along their respective
lines 35 and 36 to their respective AND-gates 33 and 34. Therefore,
AND-gates 33 and 34, whichever the case may be, are maintained at
their low state as indicated at the bottom of FIG. 2b.
FIG. 2c, on the other hand, represents what happens in the
operation of the sensing circuit shown in FIG. 2a when the
proximity switch pulses with respect to either set of pairs of
cutoff knives are caused to operate at a rotational velocity in
excess of times interval of t.sub.S. For example, as can be seen in
FIG. 2c the time interval or dwell indicated by the numeral 41
between the first two proximity switch pulses t.sub.P is
substantially less than that of the timed pulses t.sub.S of the one
shot flip-flop -3. This condition readily indicates that the
rotational velocity of the cutoff knives is exceeding the desired
maximum or threshold limit.
As the case in FIG. 2b, the timed output pulse t.sub.D of either
one shot flip-flop -1 or flip-flop -2 is triggered by the negative
going edge of the first proximity switch pulse t.sub.P. However,
since the time duration of t.sub.D is met with the coincidence of
the next promixity switch pulse t.sub.P, the respective AND-gate 33
or 34 is made to operate in view of the fact that there is a
coincidence of inputs on the AND gate inputs and the AND gate
operates from a "low" to a "high" as indicated in FIG. 2c at 42.
This signal from either of the respective AND-gate 33 or 34 is
passed by OR-gate 38 to the input of one shot flip-flop -3. The
negative going edge of the involved AND gate pulse 42 triggers into
operation the timed or "high" state of the one shot flip-flop -3.
Thus, a pulse is sent along line 40 from the output of one shot
flip-flop -3 equal to t.sub.S or, in the illustration herein
mentioned 0.33 second, which operates switching device 7 to
"override" the decrease push button 20b causing adjusting motor 15
to operate the auto transformer 13 to reduce the voltage impressed
upon the armature of main drive motor 8. All this in turn reduces
the rotational velocity of the pair of cutoff knives as well as the
lineal velocity of the web of material fed to the cutoff
apparatus.
As illustrated in FIG. 2c the correction by the sensing circuit of
the rotational velocity of the cutoff knives is linear, each
successive proximity switch pulse t.sub.P slowly being increased in
time duration from its preceding proximity switch pulse t.sub.P by
an incremental amount until the last proximity switch pulse t.sub.P
has occurred over a sufficiently given time duration or dwell from
the previous proximity switch pulse t.sub.P as to be equal to more
than the dwell of the pulse t.sub.D or equal to at least
t.sub.S.
Emphasis is again made in connection with FIG. 2c the operation of
the one shot flip-flop -1 and -2 and -3 which are always triggered
on the negative going edge of the proximity switch pulse t.sub.P,
in the case of one shot flip-flop -1 or -2 and the negative going
edge of AND gate pulse 42, in the case of one shot flip-flops are
triggered into operation to produce their respective timed pulses
t.sub.P and t.sub.S regardless of whether or not the previously
triggered pulses t.sub.P and t.sub.S have been permitted to
complete their full timed period. The retriggering of the one shot
flip-flops -1 and -2 is insufficient, being in nano-seconds, but is
indicated by the short vertical lines 43. The retriggering of one
shot flip-flop -3 is indicated by the short vertical lines 44.
Thus, when a series of corrective pulses t.sub.S are being made by
the sensing circuit, as shown in FIG. 2c, the timed pulses t.sub.D
of either of the one shot flip-flops -1 or -2 are for all practical
purposes, of constant duration until the circuit control of the
main drive motor 8 has been adjusted sufficiently to reduce the
rotational velocity of the cutoff knives to the threshold limit.
The same is true in connection with the operation of one shot
flip-flop -3 wherein the timed pulses t.sub.S actually generated
have an additive time duration indicated by the length designated
as 45.
Although the switching device 7 shown in FIG. 2a is of the same
nature and kind as shown in FIG. 1, it should be readily understood
that the switching device 7 may be in the form of a solid-state
rectifier, such as, an SCR having its gate controlled by the output
pulse t.sub.S of one shot flip-flop -3. The anode and the cathode
of the SCR would be connected by lines 21 and 22 across the
decrease push button contact 20b. Thus, upon operation of the one
shot flip-flop -3, the pulse t.sub.S would be sent along line 40 to
the gate of the SCR causing the SCR to conduct and thus "override"
the decrease push button switch 20 to operate adjusting motor 15 in
adjusting for reduction in the rotational velocity of the cutoff
knives.
Reference is now made to FIG. 3 wherein there is shown a third
embodiment of a sentinel control comprising this invention for
imposing a maximum or threshold limit on a number of revolutions
per second that can be negotiated by the cutoff knives. The
sentinel control shown in FIG. 3 differs essentially from those of
FIGS. 1 and 2a in that the sentinel control of FIG. 3 is based upon
the sheet length selection being made through a sheet length
selection control which automatically makes adjustments to the
power transmission means 12 so as to limit the operation of the
cutoff apparatus knives to a maximum of threshold limit of
specified revolutions (cuts) per second. The sentinel controls of
FIGS. 1 and 2a are designed in such a manner to effect the circuit
control means operating the main drive motor 8 by means of changing
the armature voltage impressed upon the motor. However, in the case
of FIG. 3, the circuit control means utilized controls the shunt
field voltage of the generator 56. The motor field voltage is
therefore maintained constant so that the main drive motor 8 cannot
be driven above a maximum speed as governed by the resistance in
the generator shunt field.
The motor-generator control system as shown in FIG. 3 is commonly
known as the Ward-Leonard motor control system for DC motors. The
armature of motor 8 is connected with its series field across the
generator 56. The motor 8 may be started by means of the push
button 57. The motor 8 is controlled by having its motor shunt
field constantly excited with its armature circuit energized from
the separately excited generators 56. The exciter armature with its
series field and its excited shunt field is a regulating exciter
for the generator 56. As the voltage of the generator 56 is
increased, the speed of the motor 8 increases. If the voltage on
generator 56 is decreased to zero, then the motor 8 stops.
The maximum speed level of motor 8 for a given selected sheet
length is accomplished by placing in the generator shunt field of
the generator 56 operating the motor 8, a plurality of additional
resistances R1, R2 and R3 are shown in FIG. 3. These resistances
are variable and are connected in series by means of lines 46 and
47 with resistance R3 connected to line 48, in turn, connected to
one side L.sub.2 of a DC power source. Because these resistances
are variable, it is possible to adapt the control for use with
mechanisms whose maximum speed is not limited to three cuts per
second throughout the range. Resistance R1 is connected by means of
line 50 to the maximum speed trimming resistance 51 which is also
connected in series to one side of the rheostat control 52. The
other side of the rheostat control 52 is connected in series with
the minimum speed trimming resistor 54 which, in turn, is connected
to line 55 which is the other side L.sub.1 of the DC power
source.
The point of interest with regard to the sentinel control of FIG. 3
is the generator shunt field in controlling the excitation of the
generator 56. As shown, the generator shunt field is connected
between line 55 and pointer 53 of the rheostat 52. Thus, as the
pointer 53 of the rheostat 52 is operated, the voltage on the
generator may be increased or decreased in order to control the
speed of the motor 8. The minimum trimming resistance 54 and the
maximum trimming resistance 51 provide the minimum and maximum
speed levels of operation of the motor 8 through the generator 56
when the sentinel control of FIG. 3 is not in operation. The
sentinel control comprises the additional variable resistances R1,
R2 and R3 across which are respectively connected in parallel
normally closed contacts C1, C2 and C3 of the limit switches LS1,
LS2 and LS3, respectively. Thus, the amount of additional maximum
trimming resistance placed in generator shunt field circuit is
controlled by means of placing in this circuit any one of the
resistances R1, R2, R3 or any combination thereof.
Reference is now made in connection with FIG. 3 to the sheet length
selection control panel 57 having means for changing sheet length
selection as indicated at 58. The operator changes the dial setting
at 58 to correspond to the desired sheet length to be cut by the
cutoff knives 10. Also, panel 59 includes the increase push button
18 and decrease push button 20 as previously explained in
connection with the sentinel control embodiments of FIG. 1 and FIG.
2a. The sheet control length selection control 59 can be of the
type found in Nido patent application Ser. NO. 848,469, filed Aug.
8, 1969, wherein change of the sheet length size causes operation
of the transmission adjusting motor 60 which in turn properly makes
adjustments to the variable speed transmission and cycling
mechanism, generally indicated at 12, to bring about proper
sequential operation of the cutoff knives 10 relative to material
flow to cut uniform sheet lengths from the moving web of material
fed to the cutoff apparatus. The cam disc 61 is also provided in
connection with the power transmission means 12 to be also rotated
by the adjusting motor 60 in making adjustments for sheet lengths
through the power transmission means 12. The cam disc 61 is
calibrated to approximate the sheet length selected at the sheet
length selection control 59. A cam 62 is provided on the perimeter
of the cam disc 61. The limit switches LS1, LS2 and LS3 are
positioned radially and adjacent to the cam disc 61 so that they
are selectively operated when cam 62 makes contact with the limit
switches which occurs when shorter sheet lengths are involved
thereby preventing the rotational velocity of the cutoff knives to
exceed the maximum or threshold limit by increasing the maximum
trimming resistance in the generator shunt field.
For example, if a sheet length of 60 inches is set at the sheet
length selection control panel 59, the cam disc 61 would be rotated
in such a manner that its cam 62 would take the dotted line
position as shown in 63. In this position all three limit switch
contacts C1, C2 and C3 would be closed as indicated in FIG. 3.
Thus, the motor 8 will run at any preset maximum speed as governed
by operation of the rheostat 52 and the maximum trimming resistance
51. If, however, a sheet length of 50 inches is called for at the
sheet length control, cam 62 will operate limit switch LS1 opening
contact C1 causing resistance R1 to be placed in the shunt field
circuit of generator 56 and thus limiting the maximum speed of
motor 8, for example, to 500 feet per minute. If the sheet length
is progressively shortened, limit switches LS2 and LS3 will be
consecutively operated opening their contacts C2 and C3 and, thus,
placing their corresponding resistances R2 and R3 in the series
with resistance R1. This, in turn, progressively limits the maximum
speed obtainable by motor 8 due to the fact that additional
resistance has been inserted in the generator shunt field of
generator 56.
From the foregoing it is obvious that additional limiting
resistances, such as R1 through R3, together with associated limit
switches and caming means can be utilized so that smaller speed
increments in regard to the maximum speed control on motor 8 can be
acquired. Also, a solid-state rectifier could be used instead of
the limit switch means as provided for in FIG. 3.
From all of the foregoing it should be readily seen that the
maximum or threshold limit measured as the maximum acceptable cuts
per second designed in the operation of the cutoff knife 10 is
maintained in the FIG. 3 sentinel control by means of controlling
field voltage, that is, the maximum resistance in the generator
shunt field. However, on the other hand, the sentinel controls of
FIG. 1 and FIG. 2a adjust for the maximum or threshold limit by
means of controlling the armature voltage impressed on the main
drive motor 8.
* * * * *