U.S. patent number 3,618,663 [Application Number 04/820,777] was granted by the patent office on 1971-11-09 for shale oil production.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Phillip Petroleum Company. Invention is credited to Riley B. Needham.
United States Patent |
3,618,663 |
Needham |
November 9, 1971 |
SHALE OIL PRODUCTION
Abstract
A nuclear device is positioned in a shale oil formation and
detonated to produce a chimney of fractured oil shale with lean
shale at the bottom and rich shale near the top of the chimney and
producing shale oil by retorting with a heated gas, preferably at a
low temperature for a prolonged period followed with retorting at a
higher temperature to yield shale oil.
Inventors: |
Needham; Riley B.
(Bartlesville, OK) |
Assignee: |
Phillip Petroleum Company
(N/A)
|
Family
ID: |
25231697 |
Appl.
No.: |
04/820,777 |
Filed: |
May 1, 1969 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
166/247;
166/254.2 |
Current CPC
Class: |
E21B
43/2403 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
E21B
43/24 (20060101); E21B 43/16 (20060101); E21b
043/24 (); E21b 043/26 () |
Field of
Search: |
;166/247,272,303,271,254 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Novosad; Stephen J.
Claims
I claim:
1. An improved process of recovering shale oil from a subsurface
oil shale formation containing hydrocarbons not naturally flowable
into a well bore traversing said formation with a nuclear explosive
device which comprises:
a. forming a nuclear chimney in said formation by detonating a
strategically located nuclear explosive device so that the nuclear
chimney formed following detonation contains a mass of fractured
and broken oil shale with lean shale at the bottom of the chimney
and rich shale near the top of the chimney,
b. passing a heated gas through said mass of fractured and broken
oil shale at a temperature such that said mass is preheated to a
temperature not in excess of 650.degree. F. and maintaining the
heating of said mass for a prolonged period of time of at least 30
days sufficient to bake the oil shale to reduce or substantially
prevent plastic flow during heating of the oil shale and thereby
maintain permeability of the shale without compaction of the shale
causing plugging,
c. retorting said preheated fractured shale by elevating the
temperature of same to above 700.degree. F., the retort temperature
of said fractured shale, so as to pyrolyze and produce oil
therefrom, and
d. recovering produced oil from said formation.
2. A process according to claim 1 for forming said nuclear chimney
in step (a) which comprises the additional steps of:
1. drilling an access well into the formation,
2. performing a geological survey of the oil shale along the length
of said access well to determine the location of a rich shale
section and an underlying lean shale section,
3. Disposing a nuclear device in said formation and positioning
same in said formation so that upon subsequent detonation of said
device the fragmented shale forming the nuclear produced chimney is
lean at the bottom and the thick sections of rich shale are near
the top of the chimney, and
4. detonating the nuclear device to create a cavity in said
formation, which cavity at least partially fills with collapsing
oil shale to form said chimney of fractured and crumbled shale with
lean shale at the bottom and rich shale near the top of said
chimney.
3. A process according to claim 1 wherein
1. said fractured shale is produced by first preheating same to a
temperature of 500.degree.-575.degree. F. for a period of time of
at least 30 days,
2. the temperature of the preheated fractured shale is increased to
600.degree.-650.degree. F. at a rate of 1/2.degree. to 2.degree. F.
per day and said heating is continued within the latter temperature
range for 3 to 70 days, and
3. said preheated fractured shale is then rapidly heated to
700.degree.-800.degree. F., the final retorting temperature, and
continued within this temperature range until said fractured shale
is essentially produced.
4. A process according to claim 1 wherein said heating gas is
introduced into the top of the chimney and said oil is recovered
principally from the bottom thereof.
5. A process according to claim 1 wherein said gas comprises
essentially combustion gases.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to improvements in recovery of oil from
subsurface oil shale and similar formations. In accordance with one
aspect, this invention relates to an improvement for fracturing an
oil shale formation with a nuclear device to form a chimney and
retorting of the mass of fractured oil shale in the chimney with a
heated gas. In accordance with another aspect, this invention
relates to a method for strategically locating a nuclear device in
an oil shale formation in order to produce a usable nuclear chimney
which can be heated at a lower temperature in order to maintain
more permeability without compaction of the shale causing plugging.
In accordance with a further aspect, this invention relates to the
determining of where to locate a nuclear device in order to produce
a nuclear chimney comprising a mass of fractured oil shale with
lean shale at the bottom and rich shale near the top of the
chimney, followed by producing shale oil from the chimney by
heating stepwise at different temperatures.
Despite the widespread occurrence of oil shale throughout much of
the world, the large scale recovery of shale oil from such deposits
has not been widely practiced. The barriers of geology, technology
and economics have heretofore effectively prevented more than token
use of this source of oil. Geologically, many of the potentially
most productive shales are covered by deep overburdens of earth and
rock and, except in a few instances of outcroppings or surface
valleys, are inaccessible for commercial recovery. Technologically,
oil shale occurs as a relatively compact, impermeable rock which by
present practice must be crushed or fractured by mechanical means
before oil can be recovered by retorting the fragments; because of
this impermeability, in situ retorting of oil shale has not met
with success. From the economic standpoint, shale mining by open
pit methods involves problems of overburden disposal,
transportation to the refinery, crushing and grinding and disposal
of spent shale. Similarly, underground mining by gallery techniques
and subsequent crushing and heating in special retorts is hardly
suitable when considering current day liquid fuel requirements.
Control of the tremendous energy of nuclear devices for peacetime
uses has of late become a subject of considerable interest. With
the knowledge that such energy in the form of thermal nuclear
explosives should be available for a fraction of a mil per kilowatt
hour equivalent, numerous applications involving underground
explosions have been proposed. Further, it has now been realized
that ultrahigh energy explosions can be used in mining operations
to break up formations in the oil industry to increase or stimulate
productivity by heating or raising the pressure of a reservoir and
in landscaping or earth moving techniques such as digging canals,
making harbors or removing troublesome obstacles.
The present invention is primarily directed to the production of
oil utilizing an underground explosion chamber in a bituminous
deposit suitable for the explosion of a high energy explosive
charge. A nuclear explosion within a bed of shale deep in the earth
produces a huge chimney containing a mass of shale rubble which has
high permeability and is amenable to production by contacting the
shale with hot gases. The nuclear chimney may have a diameter of
600 feet and a height of about 1,400 feet. In heating oil shale
with hot gases, one of the problems encountered is that of plastic
flow which greatly reduces or completely eliminates permeability,
thereby hindering or terminating the pyrolysis operation. This
invention is concerned with the strategic location of a nuclear
device prior to detonation to form a chimney with lean shale near
the bottom and rich shale near the top and subsequent heating with
hot gases with the reduction or prevention of plastic flow during
the heating of the oil shale, with such gases.
Accordingly, it is an object of this invention to provide a method
for producing a usable nuclear chimney in a bituminous
formation.
Another object of this invention is to provide a process for
producing oil from an oil shale by pyrolysis with hot gases which
avoids or substantially diminishes plastic flow of the shale.
Another object is to provide a process for producing oil from shale
rubble in a nuclear chimney by effecting pyrolysis with hot gas
while avoiding substantial plastic flow of the shale.
A further object of this invention is to provide a process for
heating a nuclear chimney at a lower temperature in order to
maintain more permeability without compaction of the shale causing
plugging.
Other objects and aspects as well as the several advantages of the
invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon
consideration of the accompanying disclosure and the appended
claims.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with a broad aspect of the invention, a nuclear
device is located in an oil shale formation in such a manner that
upon detonation of the nuclear device a nuclear chimney comprising
a mass of fractured oil shale is produced wherein the crumbled
shale is lean shale at the bottom and rich near the top of the
chimney.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, a mass of
fractured or broken oil shale in a nuclear chimney having lean
shale at the bottom and rich shale near the top is produced by
being preheated with a heating gas at a temperature not in excess
of 650.degree. F. for a prolonged period of time so as to maintain
permeability of the shale without compaction of the shale and
causing plugging, followed by heating at a retorting temperature in
excess of 700.degree. F.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, the
nuclear chimney comprising a mass of fractured oil shale with lean
shale at the bottom and rich shale near the top of the chimney is
produced by passing a heating gas through the mass of fractured oil
shale at a temperature so as to preheat the shale at a temperature
in the range of 500.degree.-575.degree. F. for a period of time of
at least 30 days, and then increasing the temperature of the
fractured shale at a rate of 1/2.degree. to 2.degree. F. per day to
a temperature in the range of 600.degree.-650.degree. F., and
continuing the heating within this range for a period of 3 to 70
days and then rapidly heating the formation to a temperature of
700.degree.-800.degree. F., the final retorting temperature to
produce the oil shale.
In accordance with another preferred embodiment, the heating gas is
introduced into the top of the chimney and the oil is received
principally from the bottom thereof.
The heating gas is preferably combustion gases. The heating can,
however, be carried out also with hot inert gases and/or hot
recycle produced gases, depending upon availability.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
FIG. 1 graphically illustrates shale richness distribution as a
function of formation depth in an oil shale formation treated
according to the present invention; and
FIG. 2 graphically shows the temperature history of a fragmented
oil shale bed treated in accordance with the present invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
As discussed above, one of the major technical operability
uncertainties regarding in situ retorting of oil shale contained in
a nuclear chimney is shale compaction during heating and the
resulting reduction in permeability. In accordance to the
invention, this reduction of permeability is controlled by
selection of the chimney location so that the bottom of the
fragmented shale is lean and the thick sections of the rich shale
are near the top, and producing of the shale oil is preferably
effected by prolonged heating of the shale at temperatures below
the rapid retorting temperature and then subsequent recovery of the
remaining oil by heating to a higher temperature.
Bituminous deposits containing oil shale can be produced in
accordance with the method of the present invention. The process is
suitable for rock formations known as "oil shale" which contain a
combination of organic and inorganic sediments which have become
hardened into impermeable rock. Suitable shales have a compressive
strength in the range of 5,000 to 30,000 p.s.i. The organic portion
laid down in layers is a solid amorphous material generally known
as kerogen which can be converted to oil under the application of
heat. The oil recovered is a black, viscous, waxy substance which
will not flow below about 85.degree. or 90.degree. F.
The method of the present invention is employed with bituminous
deposits lying in the range of from 100 to 20,000 feet below the
surface of the earth. The minimum ground cover required is that
necessary to insure complete containment of the explosion. This
depends upon the energy yield of the explosive utilized. For
nuclear devices, the minimum depth in feet is approximately equal
to in the range of 250-450 times the cube root of the size of the
device in kilotons. Thus, the explosion from a 1-kiloton nuclear
bomb is completely contained if the device is exploded 250-450 feet
below the nearest surface point. The maximum depth is limited only
by the economic considerations involved in penetrating very
deep-lying formations with conventional drilling equipment.
The method of the present invention is carried out utilizing a
thermal nuclear device such as the hydrogen or atomic bomb.
Suitable thermal nuclear devices are now available for underground
explosion; therefore, it is to be understood that the present
discovery involves merely the use of a nuclear device in a novel
and useful method of exploding oil deposits and that the
fabrication and manufacture of hydrogen and atomic bombs form no
part of this invention.
To employ the invention, it is preferable to drill an access well
into the formation and then performing a geological survey of the
oil shale along the length of said access well to determine the
location of a rich shale section and an underlying lean shale
section. In the Green River shale in the Piceance Creek basin there
is excellent lateral continuity of the shale strata therefore some
definition of the shale beds already exists. In addition the
richness of the shale can be obtained by two methods, (a) core
drilling of the entire shale section and analysis of the recovered
core, and (b) logging of the drilled hole.
Upon determining location of a rich shale section and an underlying
lean shale section, a nuclear explosive device is then placed into
the formation in such a manner that upon detonation a nuclear
chimney is produced with lean shale at the bottom and rich shale
near the top of the chimney.
In a specific embodiment of the process, oil is retorted from a
shale seam which is 900 feet in thickness and carries an overburden
of 1,650 feet of rock. The shale seam contains an average of 27.3
gallons of oil per ton (Fischer assay) in the top half of the seam
and 23.1 gallons of oil per ton (Fischer assay) in the bottom half
of the seam. A 100 kiloton nuclear device is disposed in a well
near the lower innerface of the shale seam and the underlying rock.
Upon detonation of the device, a chimney having a radius of 180
feet and 900 feet height is formed. The crumbled shale formation is
provided with inlet means for introducing hot retorting gas into
the upper portion of the cavity and recovering means for recovery
from the bottom of the mass of crumbled shale and bringing to the
earth's surface gases and liquids. An inert gas such as nitrogen or
combustion gases or hot recycle produced gases are introduced
through the inlet means into the cavity and heat the formation as
described above to produce shale oil. Gases and condensed liquids
are withdrawn and transported to the surface via the recovery
means.
The mass of fractured or broken oil shale ordinarily will have a
Fischer assay value in the range of 15-50 gallons per ton.
The fractured shale in a preferred embodiment is first preheated to
a temperature of 500.degree.-575.degree. F. for a period of time of
at least 30 days. Generally the heating will be continued at this
temperature for a period of time ranging from 100 to 1,000
days.
The temperature of the preheated fractured shale is then preferably
increased to a temperature in the range of 600.degree.-650.degree.
F. at a rate of 1/2 to 2.degree. F. per day, and the heating in
this temperature range is continued for a period of 3 to 70 days.
Maintaining the shale temperature in these low temperature ranges
hardens the shale, retaining more of the fragmented shale bed
permeability.
After the formation is heated to 600.degree.-650.degree. F. for a
prolonged period of time, it is heated rapidly to
700.degree.-800.degree. F., the final retorting temperature. The
heating during the final retorting temperature is continued
generally until the formation is substantially depleted of shale
oil.
In heating the oil shale rubble with hot gases, it is feasible to
utilize combustion gases, inert gases and/or hot recycle produced
gases. It is preferred to inject a hot gas into the top of the
chimney and move the heat front downwardly through the rubble.
EXAMPLE
In order to illustrate the operation of the invention, the
effective permeability at 800.degree. F. has been calculated for
four specific cases. These calculations were performed using data
which are summarized in table 1. The average particle size in the
900-foot high nuclear chimney used in each case was assumed to be
one foot. In all four cases the shale represented in FIG. 1 was
used. The four cases calculated are stated below.
Case I--A fragmented shale column 900 feet high located between
1,400 and 2,300 feet below the surface in the well shown in FIG. 1.
FIG. 1 shows the position of the shale column as position number 1.
The shale richness distribution is also shown in FIG. 1. This
fragmented shale column is heated to 800.degree. F. by the
injection of hot gases into the top of the chimney to recover the
shale oil. The resulting retorted fragmented shale bed permeability
is estimated to be 30 Darcy.
II-- A fragmented shale column 900 feet high located between 1,650
and 2,550 feet below the surface in the well shown in FIG. 1. FIG.
1 shows this position of the shale column as position number 2.
Again the shale richness distribution is shown in FIG. 1. This
fragmented shale column is heated to 800.degree. F. by the
injection of hot gases into the top of the chimney to recover the
shale oil. The resulting permeability of the retorted fragmented
shale bed is estimated to be 120 Darcy.
Case III--This case is identical to case I except that the shale is
heated to 600.degree. F. for 350 hours before the shale temperature
is increased to 800.degree. F. This low temperature heating results
in a permeability of the retorted fragmented shale bed of 150
Darcy.
Case IV--This case is identical to case II except that the shale is
heated to 600.degree. F. for 350 hours before the shale temperature
is increased to 800.degree. F. This low temperature heating results
in a permeability of the retorted fragmented shale bed of 540
Darcy.
It can be seen that by placing the fragmented shale column in such
a position that the richer shale sections are nearer the top (case
II compared with case I) that the permeability of the retorted
shale bed was increased from 30 to 120 Darcy. It can also be seen
that by preheating the shale to 600.degree. F. for 350 hours the
retorted shale bed permeability was increased from 30 to 150 Darcy
(comparison of case III with case I) and from 120 to 540 Darcy
(comparison of case IV to case II) for chimney positions numbers 1
and 2, respectively.
It should especially be noted that a combination of chimney
placement and preheating increased the retorted shale bed
permeability from 30 to 540 Darcy (comparison of case IV to case
I).
Although in the above example the shale was preheated at
600.degree. F. to increase the retorted shale bed permeability,
other preheat temperatures and other times can be used. The low
temperature (500.degree. to 650.degree. F.) history of the shale is
a determining factor in maintaining a high bed permeability. There
are several methods that can be used to heat the shale to a low
temperature and then continue the retorting at a temperature in
excess of 700.degree. and in general about 800.degree. F. One
method which uses the injection of hot inert gases and recycle
produced gases is outlined below:
A typical operation to achieve the required low temperature heating
of the shale would be to inject hot gases into the top of the
nuclear chimney and withdraw the gases and generated oil from the
chimney bottom. The temperature of the injected gases is increased
over a several-day span to a temperature in the
500.degree.-575.degree. F. range. Thereafter, the temperature is
increased very slowly (perhaps, for example, 1/2.degree. to
2.degree. F. per day) to a temperature in the range of
600.degree.-650.degree. F. Then the temperature is raised
relatively rapidly to the final retorting temperature of at least
700.degree. and generally to about 800.degree. F. This temperature
history is represented graphically in FIG. 2. The result of a
temperature history such as the above is that the shale throughout
the chimney is subjected to a low temperature history without the
necessity of an accurate knowledge of the magnitude of the heat
losses to the chimney wall. As the heat is carried down the chimney
by the injected and created gases, the shale will be heated at a
lower rate, thus subjecting the lower shales to a longer effective
low temperature history.
It appears that the critical temperature span for subjecting the
shale to an effective low temperature history is from about
500.degree. to 650.degree. F. The data in table I illustrate that
prolonged low temperature heating of the shale at 650.degree. F.
had only a minor influence upon the retorted shale bed
permeability. The time required to achieve an appreciable
permeability benefit at a temperature of 500.degree. F. would be
too long for practical application; therefore, temperatures below
500.degree. F. are thus excluded. Indeed, the critical temperature
range is probably within 550.degree. to 625.degree. F. However, in
practice the shale could be heated slowly over a broader
temperature range (such as 500.degree. to 650.degree. F.) to insure
a sufficient low temperature history even in the presence of
natural variations in heating rates due to the heat lost to the
chimney wall and variations in the gas flow due to variations in
the shale bed permeability. ##SPC1##
By a comparison of runs 1 and 5, 12 and 13, it can be seen that
prolonged heating at 600.degree. F. (a temperature below the rapid
pyrolysis temperature range) is effective in maintaining a higher
permeability. A comparison of runs 12 and 14 shows that a
temperature of 650.degree. F. had little effect upon the final
permeability at 800.degree. F. Heating preferably is achieved by
the use of hot inert gases and the use of recycle produced
gases.
* * * * *