U.S. patent number 3,616,420 [Application Number 04/778,752] was granted by the patent office on 1971-10-26 for aluminum base alloys and anodes.
This patent grant is currently assigned to The British Aluminium Company Limited. Invention is credited to Trevor Broughton.
United States Patent |
3,616,420 |
Broughton |
October 26, 1971 |
ALUMINUM BASE ALLOYS AND ANODES
Abstract
Aluminum base alloys which are suitable for use in the as cast
state as galvanic anodes, the alloys comprising 1-15% zinc,
0.005-0.1% indium and 0.4-10% magnesium, the balance being aluminum
of at least 99.8 percent purity with inconsequential impurities.
The alloy may optionally include some tin, for example in the range
of 0.1-0.5 percent, some gallium in the range of from 0.005 to
0.017 percent and a grain refiner such as titanium and
zirconium.
Inventors: |
Broughton; Trevor
(Beaconsfield, EN) |
Assignee: |
The British Aluminium Company
Limited (London, EN)
|
Family
ID: |
25114303 |
Appl.
No.: |
04/778,752 |
Filed: |
November 25, 1968 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
204/196.24;
204/293; 420/541 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C23F
13/14 (20130101); C22C 21/10 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
C23F
13/00 (20060101); C22C 21/10 (20060101); C23F
13/14 (20060101); C23f 013/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;75/146,147,148,140,141
;148/32,32.5 ;204/148,197,293 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Dean; Richard O.
Claims
I claim:
1. An aluminum base alloy for use as a sacrificial anode material
consisting essentially of 1-15 percent zinc, 0.005-0.1 percent
indium, 0.4-10 percent magnesium, 0-0.5 percent tin and 0-0.017
percent gallium the balance being aluminum of at least 99.8 percent
purity with inconsequential impurities.
2. An aluminum base alloy according to claim 1 containing less than
0.2 percent of each of silicon and iron as impurities.
3. An aluminum base alloy according to claim 1 in which the zinc
content is not less than 2 percent and not more than 10
percent.
4. An aluminum base alloy according to claim 3 in which the zinc
content is not less than 2.5 percent and not more than 8
percent.
5. An aluminum base alloy according to claim 1 in which the indium
content is not less than 0.01 percent and not more than 0.05
percent.
6. An aluminum base alloy according to claim 5 in which the indium
content is not less than 0.03 percent and not more than 0.04
percent.
7. An aluminum base alloy according to claim 1 in which the
magnesium content is not less than 0.4 percent and not more than 1
percent.
8. An aluminum base alloy according to claim 7 in which the
magnesium content is not less than 0.6 percent and not more than
0.8 percent.
9. An aluminum base alloy according to claim 1 in which the tin
content is in the range of from 0.1 to 0.5 percent.
10. An aluminum base alloy according to claim 1 in which the
gallium content in the range of from 0.005 to 0.017 percent.
11. An aluminum base alloy according to claim 10 in which the
gallium content is 0.01 percent.
12. An aluminum base alloy according to claim 1 including, as a
grain refiner, titanium in the range of from 0.05 to 0.07
percent.
13. An aluminum base alloy according to claim 12 containing not
less than 0.01 percent and not more than 0.04 percent titanium.
14. A method of producing a galvanic anode comprising forming an
alluminium base alloy consisting essentially of 1-15 percent zinc,
0.005-0.1 percent indium, 0.4-10 percent magnesium, 0-0.5 percent
tin and 0-0.017 percent gallium, the balance being aluminum of at
least 99.8 percent purity with inconsequential impurities, casting
the alloy into a mold and allowing it to cool in the mold to
ambient temperature.
15. A method according to claim 14, in which the alloy includes, as
a grain refiner, titanium in the range of from 0.005 to 0.07
percent.
16. A cast galvanic anode composed of an aluminum base alloy
consisting essentially of 1-15 percent zinc, 0.005-0.1 percent
indium, 0.4-10 percent magnesium, 0-0.5 percent tin and 0-0.017
percent gallium, the balance being aluminum of at least 99.8
percent purity with inconsequential impurities, said anode having
been cast in a mold and allowed to cool therein to ambient
temperature.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The requirements for galvanic anodes are a high operating potential
and a high efficiency measured as electrical output per unit mass
of metal consumed.
Many conventional alloys used for forming anodes, for example
aluminum-zinc-tin alloys in production at the present time require
a heat treatment after being cast before they are suitable for use.
There are considerable economic and technical advantages in being
able to produce high capacity sacrificial anodes which will operate
satisfactorily in the as-cast condition without the necessity for
formal heat treatment.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF INVENTION
We have found that the incorporation of magnesium in an
aluminium-zinc-indium alloy in the correct proportion provides a
satisfactory as-cast product.
Accordingly the invention provides in one aspect an aluminum base
alloy comprising 1-15 percent zinc, 0.005-0.1 percent indium and
0.4-10 percent magnesium, the balance being aluminum of at least
99.8 percent purity with inconsequential impurities.
The proportion as impurities of silicon and iron should each
preferably be below 0.2 percent. Preferably the zinc content is
between 2 and 10 percent and with advantage between 2.5 and 8
percent. Preferably the indium content is between 0.01-0.05 percent
and with advantage between 0.03 and 0.04 percent. Preferably the
magnesium content is between 0.4 and 1 percent and with advantage
is between 0.6 and 0.8 percent particularly where restrictions to
incendive sparkling apply. The alloy may also include some tin, for
example in the range 0.1 to 0.5 percent.
It is preferable to include some gallium in the range 0.005 to
0.017 percent and preferably for example 0.01 percent.
In this specification all percentages are by weight.
It is further preferred to include a grain refiner of any suitable
form (for example titanium and zirconium) to improve the cast
product.
In another aspect the invention provides an anode in the as-cast
state made from an alloy as set out above.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Some aluminum base anodes were made up and tested by way of example
as follows:
Aluminum was melted and raised to a temperature of 710.degree. C.
Zinc, indium, (and in some cases tin) were added as required and
this operation was followed by degassing. Magnesium was then added
as required and to minimize oxidation effects additions were made
under a layer of Coverall 33F. The melt was then thoroughly stirred
with the temperature controlled between 710.degree.-730.degree.
C.
Casting was then carried out into dies held at
100.degree.-250.degree. C.
Half inch sections were cut from 1 -inch-diameter test bars of the
material to be tested and electrical connections made through a
threaded length of one-eighth-inch-diameter aluminum rod screwed
into the upper machine surface of the specimen. Both machined
surfaces were marked off using a stopping off medium and the
weighed samples were then mounted concentrically in 9-inch
diameter, 12-inch high, shot-blasted mild steel drums containing
about 11 liters of natural sea water. Gentle agitation by stirring
was used during the test and the electrolyte in the tank was
changed regularly. The tests were carried out at laboratory
temperatures.
The current supplied by the dissolving anode after being connected
to the steel drum was restricted to an anode current density of 10
ma./in..sup.2 by means of a variable resistor in the external
circuit. The potential drop across a further accurately calibrated
resistor (also in the external circuit) was used to monitor the
current flow and these values were recorded automatically every
four hours during test. The total current supplied by the anode
section could therefore be calculated.
The period of testing varied from 40-60 days by which time about 50
percent of the specimen had been consumed. After removing from the
test environment specimens were cleaned in 1:1 nitric acid (to
remove adherent corrosion product,) and were then reweighed after
drying.
The theoretical output for the particular weight loss of the
specimen was calculated using an electrochemical equivalent for the
particular alloy on test (i.e. allowance made for the zinc content
of the alloy) and the efficiency calculated as the percentage of
the theoretical output actually supplied by the anode during
testing.
Potentials were measured at regular intervals throughout the test
using a saturated calomel electrode in contact with the dissolving
aluminum anode or on the outside of any adherent corrosion present
on the specimen surface. The value of potential quoted is that
measured on the final day of the test.
Examples of specifications of and properties of anodes made from
alloys in accordance with the invention are shown in table 1.
##SPC1##
It will be noticed that in the case of composition I where the
magnesium content is below 0.4 percent the operating potential fell
to -1,000 mv. and the resulting anode was less satisfactory than
those of higher magnesium contents.
Further examples of specifications of and properties of anodes made
from alloys in accordance with the invention are shown in table II.
In these examples, the copper content was in each case found to be
less than 0.005 percent and the silicon and iron contents are
shown. ##SPC2##
The applicants have investigated the effect of variations in
casting techniques on the electrochemical properties of alloys
according to the invention. These investigations involved
variations in the liquid metal temperature, variations in the mould
temperature and variations in the cooling technique. Three cooling
techniques were tried, one of these identified as the standard
procedure involved casting the metal into a mold and, when it had
become sufficiently solidified, removing it from the mold and
allowing it to cool, the second technique identified as "water
quench-cold water" involved casting the metal into a mold and, when
it had become sufficiently solidified, removing it from the mold
and quenching it in cold water, and the third technique identified
as "very slow cool in molds" involved casting the metal into a mold
and allowing it to cool in the mold to ambient temperature. This
latter technique gave a retarded rate of cooling and a superior
result as can be seen from table III below. The alloy used for the
investigation of which the results are given in table III was an
alloy containing 0.68 percent magnesium, 4.01 percent zinc, 0.038
percent indium, 0.012 percent gallium, 0.12 percent silicon, 0.07
percent iron and less than 0.005 percent copper. ##SPC3##
The addition of grain refining elements such as Zirconium and
titanium to alloys according to the invention was investigated and
the results are shown in table IV below. These results indicate
that beneficial results are obtained with the addition of a grain
refining element, preferably titanium in the range of from 0.005 to
0.07 percent and more specifically in the range of from 0.01 to
0.04 percent. In each of the alloys shown in table IV the copper
content was less than 0.01 percent. ##SPC4##
* * * * *