Forming Uniform Thick Oxide Layer Of Material

Watson , et al. October 26, 1

Patent Grant 3615885

U.S. patent number 3,615,885 [Application Number 04/653,721] was granted by the patent office on 1971-10-26 for forming uniform thick oxide layer of material. Invention is credited to Norman Hall Russell, Anton Sawatzky, Raymond Orest Sochaski, Robert Douglas Watson.


United States Patent 3,615,885
Watson ,   et al. October 26, 1971
**Please see images for: ( Certificate of Correction ) **

FORMING UNIFORM THICK OXIDE LAYER OF MATERIAL

Abstract

Several methods of producing a uniform beige oxide layer on Zircaloy-2 have been developed. The oxidized material has excellent wear resistance and should be useful for parts in rubbing contact in water-lubricated mechanisms operating at temperatures up to 500.degree. F. The oxidation rate of Zircaloy-2 in air is extremely dependent on the surface texture and the treatment given it. A rough surface produced by machining or grit blasting will assure the formation of a uniform beige post-transition oxide layer. A fine surface produced by grit blasting, polishing, machining or grinding will decrease the oxidation rate and will prevent the formation of a uniform beige post-transition oxide. Deep scratches will increase the oxidation rate, not because of contamination from the scratching surface but apparently because of the surface roughness produced.


Inventors: Watson; Robert Douglas (Deep River, Ontario, CA), Sawatzky; Anton (Pinawa, Manitoba, CA), Russell; Norman Hall (Deep River, Ontario, CA), Sochaski; Raymond Orest (Pinawa, Manitoba, CA)
Family ID: 4142666
Appl. No.: 04/653,721
Filed: July 17, 1967

Foreign Application Priority Data

Sep 19, 1966 [CA] 970,698
Current U.S. Class: 148/281; 376/417; 376/900; 376/901; 428/472.1; 976/DIG.43
Current CPC Class: C22F 1/02 (20130101); G21C 3/06 (20130101); C23C 8/12 (20130101); C23C 8/02 (20130101); C22C 16/00 (20130101); Y02E 30/40 (20130101); Y10S 376/901 (20130101); Y02E 30/30 (20130101); Y10S 376/90 (20130101)
Current International Class: C22F 1/02 (20060101); C23C 8/02 (20060101); C23C 8/12 (20060101); G21C 3/02 (20060101); G21C 3/06 (20060101); C23C 8/10 (20060101); C22C 16/00 (20060101); C23c 011/00 ()
Field of Search: ;148/6.3,6,31.5,13.1,133 ;117/221,127 ;23/140

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
1925307 September 1933 DEBoer et al.
1985118 December 1934 vanGeel
2917419 December 1959 Robinson
3314827 April 1967 DEVries
Foreign Patent Documents
555,952 Apr 1958 CA
Primary Examiner: Klein; David

Claims



What we claim is:

1. A method of forming an oxide layer from a surface layer of an article of an alloy of zirconium having a low-neutron capture cross section, which includes the steps of roughening the surface of the surface layer to a depth of between 70.mu. inches AA and 150.mu. inches AA to make the surface more receptive to oxidation and heating the surface layer between 600.degree. C. to 800.degree. C. for between 24 hours and 96 hours with the roughened surface exposed to oxygen to form from the surface layer an oxidized coherent layer, which is substantially uniform in thickness and is beige colored in appearance.

2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the alloy of zirconium comprises by weight 1.2 to 1.7 percent thin, 0.07 to 0.2 percent iron, 0.5 0.07 to 0.15 percent chromium, 0.03 to 0.08 percent nickel, balance zirconium except for impurities. AA and 150.mu. inches AA in the surface layer.

3. A method according to claim 1, wherein the surface layer is between 0.0005 inch and 0.008 inch in thickness.
Description



This invention relates to a method of forming uniform thick oxide layers on a material.

There are various methods of forming tough protective layers on metals but there are various deficiencies in most of them. Tough protective layers which have good wear-resistant properties in corrosive environments are rare and difficult to produce. Layers having good wear and corrosion resistance are especially useful in nuclear reactors where warm fluids such as heavy water at temperatures around 500.degree. F. are present and in intimate contact with the bearing surfaces such as shafts, journals as well as pump parts, etc.

It is common in nuclear reactors to use an alloy of Zirconium known as Zircaloy-2, which is composed of 1.2 to 1.7 percent tin, 0.07 to 0.2 percent iron, 0.05 to 0.15 percent chromium, 0.03 to 0.08 percent nickel and the balance Zirconium. This alloy as well as other allied Zirconium alloys such as Zircaloy-4, are extensively used because of their low neutron capture ratio, relatively high tensile strength and their ability to be machined and welded; however, they have poor wear resistance.

The present invention overcomes these difficulties by achieving a tightly adherent oxide layer on those alloys of Zirconium, which have low neutron capture ratios, such as Zircaloy-2. This oxide layer grows to thicknesses of about 0.008 inch and is beige in color. Chemically it appears to have a formula of ZrO.sub.2 and its characteristic beige color appears to be due to microcracks in the surface of the oxide layer. Such oxide layer is to be contrasted with the distinctive black or blue-black Zirconium dioxide layer which adheres to Zirconium metal as was disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 2,987,352 issued to the assignee hereof. The beige oxide of the present invention is tightly adherent to alloys of Zirconium to thicknesses of 0.008 inch whereas the blue-black oxide layer on Zirconium metal was not capable of growing to thicknesses in excess of approximately 0.0015 inch without flaking or chipping, and as a result, such layers were of limited usefulness as wear resisting and corrosive resisting surfaces because of their relative thinness.

The present invention provides a method of creating a beige (light brown)-colored Zirconium dioxide layer on the surface of a Zirconium alloy such that it is tightly adherent and uniform in thickness comprising the steps of roughing the surface of the alloy then heating the alloy at elevated temperatures in the presence of oxygen until a beige-colored oxide uniform in thickness forms.

The invention further contemplates an oxide on the surface of an alloy of Zirconium tightly adherent, beige in color and substantially uniform in thickness and color.

The invention further contemplates that the tightly adherent oxide layer has a thickness of 0.0005 inch to 0.008 inch.

The embodiments of the invention will now be described by way of example reference being had to the accompanying drawing wherein:

FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional representation of different surface profiles produced by machining Zircaloy-2.

EXAMPLE 1 (M)

As illustrated in table "A" a set of 6 Zircaloy-2 samples were prepared by machining their surface. They were then heated in air at 650.degree. C. for 24 hours.

From the table, it is clear that the surface roughness produced during machining had very pronounced effects on the oxidization characteristics of Zircaloy-2. The depth of cut, crossfeed, and sharpness of the cutting tool determine to a large extent the surface roughness obtained during machining. When the depth of cut and crossfeed are about equal, the surface profile produced with a sharp tool (nose radius 0.0005 inch) will resemble that shown in FIG. 1 a. The oxide layer formed on sample Zr2-12 produced to this configuration was not tightly adherent although it was uniform prior to flaking. This might be due to the fact that the sharp peaks produced during machining were completely oxidized and therefore began to flake.

In specimen Zr2-4 and Zr2-10 the crossfeed was considerably greater than the depth of cut and the surface configuration resembled that illustrated in FIG. 1 b. The oxide layer produced was uniform and tightly adherent and beige (light brown) in color. It was noticed that during the oxidization process the beige (light brown) oxide started forming at the sharp corners produced by the machining and spread rapidly to all parts of the surface. Specimen Zr2-9 was prepared with a cutting tool having a nose radius of about 0.0005 inch and the machining was regulated such that the crossfeed is considerably less than the depth of cut such that a surface profile resembling that of FIG. 1 c was produced; the surface finish produced was exceptionally good however, a beige-colored oxide was not uniformly produced over the surface but a black oxide and beige oxide resulted.

Samples Zr2-9 and Zr2-6 and Zr2-5, however, were too smooth to oxidize uniformly. ##SPC1##

EXAMPLE 2 (P) ##SPC2##

Various specimens of Zircaloy-2 metal were machined to roughnesses of between 70 and 150 .mu. inch AA; ground to finishes of 18 to 40 .mu. inch AA; and polished to between 7 and 18 .mu. inch AA. The specimens were then placed in a pickle bath for a short time to remove about 0.0003 inch from the surface but this did not change the surface finish a significant amount. Some of the samples were placed in a pickle bath for a longer period of time to remove about 0.003 inch from the surface. This longer pickling reduced the roughness of a rough surface while the longer pickling of smooth surfaces did not change the roughness of the surface to any great extent.

The effects of pickling on the oxidization characteristics of machined, ground and polished Zircaloy are shown in table "B."

As can be seen from this table machined surfaces (roughness of 70-150 .mu. inch AA) will normally oxidize to form a uniform layer. Except one small part of one specimen (15C) pickling for long or short periods of time did not appear to affect surface characteristics or oxide formation.

Ground surfaces (roughness of 18-40 .mu. inch AA) which have been pickled either for long or short periods of time, will not grow uniform beige oxide layers. A beige oxide layer would not grow on a polished surface of Zircaloy-2 (roughness of 7-18 .mu. inch AA). EXAMPLE 3 (A B) ##SPC3##

The effect on the oxidizing characteristics of Zircaloy-2 of air blasting with various sizes and types of abrasive grit is shown in table "C." The results have been listed in order of coarseness of grit. The blasting was accomplished in a conventional manner using the various sizes and types of grit listed in the table. All samples were oxidized at 650.degree. C. for about 24 hours in air.

From table "C," it is evident that using a hard grit having particle size at least 0.004 inch will result in a uniform beige oxide. In certain instances, such as where silicon metal is used as the abrasive grit, the resultant oxide covering the blasted area was darker than normal but in areas adjacent to the blasted area where spreading of the oxide layer occurred the oxide layer is a normal beige color.

From table "C" it appears that the composition of grit does not appear to be important except in cases where the grit is softer than the surface being abraded. Pure aluminum did help to promote the formation of a uniform oxide but not to such a degree as to make the oxide useful as a protective layer for the Zircaloy-2.

EXAMPLE 4 (S)

Scratching helps to promote the formation of an adherent beige oxide layer adjacent to the scratch. The surface of various samples cut from the same block of Zircaloy-2 metal were scratched or scored with various substances such as the elements titanium, cobalt, nickel, copper, lead, molybdenum, graphite (2H pencil), iron, magnesium, tungsten, aluminum and vanadium and then heated at 600.degree. C. for 17 hours or more. The buff oxide formed most readily along the scratches produced by the harder materials such as diamond, tungsten, molybdenum, etc. The effect of the softer materials such as aluminum, copper, iron, lead, graphite, on the oxidation characteristics of Zircaloy-2 was negligible. When a surface of Zircaloy-2 was scored using a vibrating pencil with a diamond tip then heated at 600.degree. C. in air for 24 hours, the resultant oxide was beige in color, uniform and continuous and adherent across the whole of the surface treated.

WEAR CHARACTERISTICS

Various samples of Zircaloy-2 were oxidized in the manner set out in tables "D" and "E" and the wear resistance properties of the beige oxide layers were tested. In one instance, the wear test was performed by rotating a three-fourths inch outside diameter, 304 stainless steel journal at 77 r.p.m. against the flat samples listed in table "D" under a load of 25 pounds in pH 7 water. ##SPC4##

Table "E" illustrates a wear test performed by rotating a journal of "Waukesha88*" metal of three-fourths inch outside diameter against the flat samples listed in that table, at a load of 200 pounds at a speed of 225 r.p.m. in pH 7 water. The rating characteristics listed in the right-hand column of the tables is an indication of the number of 2-hour runs that could be made under the test condition before the oxide layer wore through. ##SPC5##

CORROSION TEST

Various samples of Zircaloy-2 metal were prepared and oxidized in accordance with the particulars set out in table "F." In all instances, the resulting oxide was continuous uniform and tightly adherent. Coating-types 1 to 6 inclusive were a beige color, coating-types 7, 8 and 9 were a medium brown color. The darker color of the types 7, 8 and 9 was probably due to the effect of silicon on Zircaloy-2. The different coatings were then subjected to corrosion tests at the conditions shown in table "F." The oxide layers of types 2, 3, 5 and 6 had the lowest weight change and were considered most desirable. The type 1 and 4 oxide layers were the thickest (around 0.007 inch) and some of the relatively large weight changes during the corrosion test may have been due to spalling at the sharp corners of the specimens. ##SPC6##

Crystolon is the trade mark of Norton Company; Exolon is the registered trade mark of the Exolon Company; S. S. White is the registered trade mark of S. S. White Dental Manufacturing Company; and Waukesha 88 is the registered trade mark of an alloy produced by Waukesha Foundry Company. Throughout the application these registered trade marks have been indicated by an asterisk (*).

In this specification the abbreviation "AA" means arithmetical average deviation from mean.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed