U.S. patent number 3,607,159 [Application Number 04/638,042] was granted by the patent office on 1971-09-21 for saturated, resilient, flexible and porous abrasive laminate.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Norton Company. Invention is credited to George L. Haywood.
United States Patent |
3,607,159 |
Haywood |
September 21, 1971 |
SATURATED, RESILIENT, FLEXIBLE AND POROUS ABRASIVE LAMINATE
Abstract
A resilient, controlled density, porous structure is laminated
to a flexible backing and contains fine abrasive particles
adhesively bonded to the surface opposite such backing and
distributed within said resilient structure with the abrasive
density ranging inversely to the distance from the flexible
backing. A protective abrasion-resistant layer is interposed
between the abrasive grain and the surfaces of the resilient
structure.
Inventors: |
Haywood; George L. (Latham,
NY) |
Assignee: |
Norton Company (Troy,
NY)
|
Family
ID: |
24558400 |
Appl.
No.: |
04/638,042 |
Filed: |
May 12, 1967 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
51/295; 51/298;
51/296; 51/297; 51/299 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B24D
3/32 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B24D
3/20 (20060101); B24D 3/32 (20060101); B24b
001/00 (); C08g 051/12 () |
Field of
Search: |
;51/295,296,298,299,297 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Arnold; Donald J.
Claims
I claim:
1. An abrasive product comprising:
a. a flexible backing;
b. a resilient, controlled density, porous structure adhered to and
superposed on said backing, said structure sharing an interface
with one surface of said backing and having a plurality of internal
and external surfaces, said structures having a resiliency
identified as a 25 percent compression deflection value in the 10
to 50 pounds per square inch range, a density of from 10 to 30
pounds per cubic foot, and a porosity of from 55 percent to 85
percent;
c. an abrasion-resistant, elastomeric, film forming, resin coating
substantially completely covering said internal and external
surfaces; and
d. abrasive grain distributed on said porous structure over said
abrasion-resistant coating, with the abrasive density ranging from
minimum at said interface to maximum at the opposite face of said
porous structure.
2. An abrasive product as in claim 1 wherein the abrasive grain is
adhesively secured to the surfaces of said porous structure.
3. An abrasive product as in claim 1 wherein the porous structure
is formed of a foamed material.
4. An abrasive product as in claim 1 wherein the porous structure
is formed of reconstituted, particulate form.
5. An abrasive product as in claim 1 wherein the adhesion of the
porous structure to the flexible backing is higher than the value
at which the porous structure cohesively fails.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention deals with a coated abrasive material wherein a
flexible backing is provided to support a plurality of abrasive
grains adhesively bonded thereto. It further relates to the fine
abrasive end of such field wherein finish of the workpiece abraded
constitutes one of the important criteria for the performance of
the abrasive material. The terms "buffing" and "polishing," while
generally synonymous in common usage have definite and different
meanings in the abrasive art. Buffing means the rearrangement of
material on the surface of a workpiece, usually by friction, to
produce a high finish. In contrast, polishing means the removal of
material from a surface to correct minor surface imperfections. It
is well accepted in the art that as the requirement for high finish
goes up the ability to remove stock comes down. Therefore, the art
has consistently used one type of relatively aggressive abrasive
material for polishing and the desired stock removal and a
different type of nonabrasive or only slightly abrasive material
for buffing to a high finish.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Abrasive products made on resilient backings of various types have
been proposed for many years. Most of these seem to have been the
outgrowth of the use of sponge material for cleaning purposes and
generally have fallen into three categories: (1) a foam or sponge
having a coating of abrasive particles on the exterior thereof; (2)
a sheet of coated abrasive laminated to a sponge or foam backing;
and (3) abrasive grain incorporated in the foamable material prior
to foaming with the resultant in situ production of a foam
containing abrasive grain substantially uniformly distributed
throughout. These products have never gained good commercial
acceptance except for some minor successes as kitchen scouring
aids. Industrially, the best performing product for polishing
purposes has not been a sponge or foam-backed material but rather
one in which a layer of cork particles provided the resilient
support required to obtain a reasonably good finish while the
abrasive grain coated on the surface thereof gave a reasonable
amount of stock removal. None of these prior art products have
given satisfactory combined finish levels and stock removal rates
to satisfy the needs of industry. A laminate of foam and flexible
reinforcing backing is disclosed and claimed in my prior
application Ser. No. 632,978 filed Apr. 24, 1967 and now abandoned.
While a dramatic improvement over the prior art, this structure
suffered internal weaknesses, probably due to abrading action of
the included abrasive. The present invention constitutes a solution
to such problem and an improvement over my prior product.
Accordingly, it is the object of this invention to provide a coated
abrasive material which gives superior finish and superior stock
removal at one and the same time. It is a further object of the
invention to provide a resilient foam-containing material of this
type which is capable of withstanding the rigorous operating
conditions which have heretofore kept foam-backed abrasive products
in the kitchen and out of industrial plant use to any extent.
SUMMARY
In general, the present invention provides a coated abrasive
product wherein a controlled density porous and resilient structure
is reinforced by lamination to a flexible backing of cloth, paper,
film or the like and wherein such structure contains abrasive grain
preferably in a graded density ranging from the highest density at
the surface to the absence of substantially any abrasive grain
adjacent the flexible backing resilient structure interface. It
further provides for the internal reinforcement of the resilient
structure by a reinforcing adhesive which coats the surfaces of the
interstices of the structure as well as its surface and yet leaves
the voids within the structure substantially free of adhesive and,
in addition, acts to prevent cutting and weakening of such
structure by the sharp edges of the abrasive grain. This product,
which is described in detail below, possesses a unique combination
of strength and resilience, stock removal and buffing capability,
which permits it to outcut conventional abrasive products of like
abrasive grain size and at the same time to produce much higher
finishes than can be produced with such conventional abrasives.
Preferably the resilient structure is formed of a reconstituted
particulate foam material as is more fully described below.
DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of the material of the present
invention.
FIG. 2 is an enlarged, schematic representation of a portion of the
cross section of the material of FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 is a graphic illustration of the improvement in both finish
level and stock removal achieved by the material of the present
invention.
DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
More specifically, and referring now to the drawings, FIG. 1
illustrates the general appearance of the improved abrasive
material of the present invention. The material 10 comprises a
flexible reinforcing and supporting member 11 which may be paper,
cloth, film, fiber or any of the backing materials conventionally
used for coated abrasive manufacture. Superposed on and sharing an
interface with said backing 11 to which it is adhered by a layer of
adhesive 12 is a resilient structure 13 having a controlled
density, compressibility and pore size as is more fully described
below. Disposed on and preferably within the surface of structure
13 is a plurality of abrasive grains 14 grading from a dense
concentration at the outer surface 15 of the resilient structure
progressively to substantially grain-free concentration adjacent
the adhesive layer 12 between member 11 and structure 13. Unseen in
he scale of the drawing of FIG. 1, but shown clearly in the
enlarged schematic view of FIG. 2, is an abrasion-resistant coating
18 covering the surfaces of the structure 13 formed by its outer
surface 15 and internal surfaces or interstice walls 17. Coating 18
is essentially a continuous coating in that it coats all exposed
and available surfaces of structure 13 with a thin layer but is
discontinuous in the sense that it does not bridge across the pore
or interstice openings to form an essentially continuous film at
the top surface 15 of structure 13. Anchored to the
abrasion-resistant coating 18 and through it to the structure 13 is
a plurality of abrasive grains 14. These are bonded to coating 18
by a separately applied grit-bonding adhesive 16.
The resilient structure 13 may be formed of any solvent-resistant,
durable organic foam or foamlike material having a density of from
10 to 30 pounds per cubic foot, a 25 percent compression deflection
value as measure by ASTM 1961 1147- 61T (Test For Compressibility
And Recovery of Gaskets) in the 10 to 50 pounds per square inch
range, a porosity of from 55 percent to 85 percent and an average
pore or interstice opening diameter at the surface of from 0.006
inch to 0.020 inch. Such a pore size amounts to a count of from
about 80 to 150 openings per linear inch. In the preferred
embodiment the density ranges from 14 to 16 pounds per cubic foot
and the pore size is the equivalent of 100 plus or minus 10
openings per linear inch. Where foam is employed, it is preferably
of the open cell or reticulated type. While the thickness of the
resilient structure may vary substantially dependent upon the use
of the resultant abrasive product, it is preferably one-fourth inch
or less in thickness with the optimum being about one-sixteenth
inch thickness. Such resilient structure is preferably formed of a
solvent-resistant foam or foam-type product. While by selection of
the foam-forming constituents and control of the foaming conditions
it may be possible to produce a virgin open structure, skinless
foam having the required density, porosity, pore size and
compressibility, it is preferred to form such resilient structure
from a reconstituted particulate foam wherein the original foam is
broken down mechanically into a plurality of "crumbs" or small
sections of foam, mixed with an adhesive binder and moulded under
pressure to produce the desired properties. Such reconstituted foam
may be formed as sheets or moulded in the form of a block or
cylindrical "log." In the case of sheets it is merely cut into
requisite widths for use in this invention, while in the case of
blocks it is fletched or cut into sheets from such block.
Preferably it is formed into a log and then the log is peeled in
the same manner as veneer is peeled from a log of wood. The
resultant sheet appears to possess better "hand" and tear
resistance than sheets formed by the other methods indicated above.
While a variety of solvent-resistant foam materials may be used,
the preferred material is polyurethane, either polyester or
polyether type. Such foams are readily available commercially and
have been found to be the best in the present application.
As indicated above, the flexible backing member may be any of the
conventional, readily available flexible backings known to the
coated abrasive art. While conventional abrasive cloth backings are
preferred due to the ease with which they may be joined in the
fabrication of belts, etc., it is possible to use many types of
filamentary or fibrous materials such as papers, vulcanized fibers,
films, foils, thin metal backings and the like as the end
application use may dictate.
The resilient structure is bonded to the backing member in any
suitable fashion. Obviously, the adhesive used must bond to both
the resilient structure and to the backing used but this is a mere
matter of skill in the art and presents no particular problem.
However, the adhesive must be solvent-resistant in order to prevent
delamination when the product is used in "wet" grinding operations.
Further, although it is possible to use the adhesive used to bind
the reconstituted foam particles together (when the resilient
structure is formed of such reconstituted foam) and to reactivate
its adhesiveness by heat or solvent, it is preferred to utilize a
separate laminating adhesive to insure firm anchorage. While any
suitable adhesive including hot-melt, pressure or heat-activated
types, etc., may be used, the preferred adhesives are rubber or
neoprene based as illustrated in U.S. Pats. Nos. 2,610,910 and
2,918,442, and self cross-linking acrylics such as Rhoplex E-32
produced by Rohm and Haas Company. The laminating adhesive is
preferably applied as a film on the backing and/or on one side of
the resilient structure and the two components brought into
intimate contact by passing them between rolls or the like.
Adhesion of the foam to the backing must be sufficient to withstand
the shock, shear stress and abrasion encountered during use and
should generally be in excess of 4.0 pounds per inch as measured by
ASTM (1964 ) D-1876, T-Peel Test, or at least in excess of the
value at which the foam cohesively fails when the foam-to-backing
adhesion is measured by such test.
Since the primary usage of this material is in a combined polishing
and buffing-type operation, the abrasive grain is preferably on the
fine side ranging from grit 220 down to grit 400 or finer. The type
of abrasive grain does not appear critical and any of the abrasive
materials such as silicon carbide, aluminum oxide, garnet, flint,
diamond, emery and the like or mixtures thereof conventionally used
in the coated abrasive art may be used in the present product as
desired.
The abrasion-resistant coating which is applied to the surfaces of
the resilient structure must protect the surfaces of the resilient
structure against cutting by the abrasive grain, must have
sufficient tensile strength to impart improved cohesiveness to such
structure and yet must not rigidify such structure to the point
where the structure ceases to possess the resilience and
compressibility necessary to its function as a yieldable support
for the abrasive grain. Any of the various elastomeric film-forming
materials known to the art may be used provided the above criteria
are met. In addition, other materials such as epoxy resins which
form flexible, nonbrittle films may be used as desired. A preferred
film former is of the so-called "Byck" resin type which is formed
of a blend of drying oil-modified phenolics which produce a soft
flexible film. The film former is applied to the surface of the
resilient structure and then is forced into and through the pores
of the structure by any of a number of methods known to the art,
i.e., vacuum impregnation, air pressure or mechanical. Preferably
the material is forced through the resilient structure by nip
rolling. The degree of penetration is controlled by adjusting
viscosity and by the pressure applied during coating. Penetration
should be sufficient to substantially uniformly coat all exposed
surfaces of the resilient structure including both the interior and
exterior walls of the pores or interstices of such structure but
care should be taken not to flood the structure to the extent that
the pores or interstices are filled or clogged by the film-forming
material. The film former may be applied prior to or after
lamination of the resilient structure to the flexible baking
member. The resultant product has the abrasion-resistant film
extending in essentially continuous manner throughout and as a
result is strengthened internally both against externally applies
tearing forces and against tearing as a result of the sharp-edged
abrasive grain which is subsequently applied on and in the surfaces
of the structure.
The abrasion resistance of the resilient structure is measured by a
crockmeter consisting of a weighted arm carrying at its tip a
United States one penny coin. The weighted arm is reciprocated over
a stroke of 41/2inches at a rate of 110 strokes per minute in a
direction parallel to the 8 inch length of a 2 inch .times.8 inch
.times.1/16 inch test specimen of foam or other resilient material
being tested. The plane of the coin is at right angles to the
direction of movement of the arm and the rim of the coin is tangent
to the surface of the test specimen. The downward force on the coin
is one-half pound. The endpoint of each test is the number of
strokes required to first remove discrete particles or crumbs of
material from the test specimen. Comparison between the untreated
foam and the identical material treated with the abrasion-resistant
coating described above gives the following results:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Untreated Treated Foam Foam
__________________________________________________________________________
Tensile (ASTM D-1564) 43 p.s.i. 55 p.s.i. Elongation (ASTM D-1564)
72 % 82 % Rebound Resilience (ASTM D-1564) 13 % 9.5 % Abrasion
Resistance (as above) 13 strokes 130 strokes Porosity 80 % 74 %
__________________________________________________________________________
The final component of the present material is the adhesive used to
bind the abrasive grain to the resilient structure. In contrast to
conventional coated abrasives where an extremely hard, rigid binder
is desired, the grit binder for use on this polishing and buffing
material must be at least semiflexible when cured and dried to its
final stage. The adhesive should not be highly cohesive in the
sense that it forms a film over the pores of the resilient
structure. These pores must be left substantially open in the
finished product. Whereas, the laminating adhesive must be solvent
resistant, it is possible for some uses to utilize a nonwaterproof
adhesive as the grit binder or maker coat. Sixty-two millipoise
glue has been found to be satisfactory for such products.
Generally, however, the grit binder is solvent resistant and the
use of drying oil-modified phenolic or epoxy resins is preferred.
The adhesive grit binder is not applied in a separate layer as with
conventional coated abrasives but is used to form a slurry with the
abrasive grain and the mixture of grain and adhesive is applied by
nip-roll coating to the surface of the resilient structure. As the
laminate passes through the nip rolls, an excess of the slurry is
applied and the pressure is controlled so as to force the abrasive
into the resilient structure only to the extent of less than 75
percent of the thickness of such structure. Preferably the
penetration will lie between 10 percent and 50 percent of the
distance between the surface of the resilient structure and the
flexible backing resilient structure interface. Due to the
controlled porosity and pore size, a filtering action takes place
and the density of the abrasive varies from heavy at the exterior--
progressively lighter to essentially none at said interface. This
gradation permits retention of the resilient nature of the
structure and retains a yieldable support for the abrasive grain.
Visually the surface of the resilient structure will appear
completely covered. However, most of the pore openings remain and
the finished coated structure retains at least 60 percent of its
initial porosity. Porosity is determined by comparing the apparent
volume of a specimen, i.e., its weight in air divided by its
measured geometric volume, with its actual volume, i.e., that
volume actually occupied by the solid parts of the structure. A
porosity of 80 percent therefore means that 80 percent of the
volume of the specimen is void and only 20 percent is solid
material.
The resiliency of the finished product is at least 8 percent and
preferably 9 percent or more as measured by ASTM D-1564 -R,
Resilience (Ball Rebound) Test. The deposited grain weight is
preferably about 6 pounds per sandpaper ream when using 400 grit
silicon carbide, although grain weights as low as 2 -3 pounds per
sandpaper ream or as high as 9-10 pounds per sandpaper ream may be
used if desired.
Following application of the slurry, the product is then dried
and/or cured as the nature of the grit binder requires and is then
ready for fabrication into belts, sheets, discs, rolls or other
conventional coated abrasive implement forms.
The following specific examples are illustrative of the preferred
embodiments of the invention:
EXAMPLE I
A standard, waterproof coated abrasive backing material, 6 inches
wide, was coated on the square side with a 0.017-inch thick wet
coating of a neoprene base solvent cement (3M EC-1300 adhesive). A
1/16-inch thick layer of reconstituted polyurethane particle foam,
6 inches wide having a density of 15lb./ft..sup.3, a porosity of 80
percent, a 25 percent compression-deflection value of 14 p.s.i. and
an average cell opening diameter of 0.008 inch, was brought into
contact with the wet adhesive coating and the combination passed
through a conventional textile hot-can line, with a minimum dwell
time on the 200.degree. F. heated cans of 2 1/2 minutes.
The foam-to-backing laminate was then treated by nip-roll coating,
using two 4-inch diameter, 60 durometer rubber rolls, spaced 4
inches on centers, a throughput speed of 14 f.p.m. and employing a
40 percent total solids saturating solution. This
abrasion-resistant coating material was a mixture of a
nonheat-reactive, oil-modified phenolic plasticizing resin, a 100
percent phenolic heat-reactive, oil-soluble resin and associated
solvents, for example:
Bakelite Resin BKS-8997 (nonheat-reactive phenolic) 350 g. Bakelite
Resin CKR-1634 (heat-reactive phenolic) 237 g. High Flash Naphtha
390 g. Cellosolve 12 g.
The saturated foam-to-backing laminate was then dried in an oven at
150.degree. F. for 1 hour.
The treated foam-to-backing laminate was then nip-roll coated with
an adhesive-abrasive grain slurry, using the same equipment and
operating conditions described above. The slurry consisted of 3
parts by weight of abrasive grain and 2 parts by weight of a
mixture of a nonheat-reactive, oil-modified phenolic plasticizing
resin, a 100 percent phenolic heat-reactive oil-soluble resin and
associated solvents as follows-- 3 parts by weight of silicon
carbide 400-grit abrasive grain dispersed in 2 parts by weight of a
mixture consisting of:
Bakelite Resin BKS-8997 350 g. Bakelite Resin CKR-1634 237 g. High
Flash Naphtha 119 g. Cellosolve 12 g.
The slurry-coated laminate was cured in an oven at 220.degree. F.
for 2 hours after curing was found to have an abrasive grain
content of about 7 pounds of grain per sandpaper ream.
The cured laminate was then cut to 21/2 -inch width and 60-inch
length and the ends adhesively joined to form an endless belt. The
belt was evaluated on a flat-finishing unit as to its ability to
cut and polish aluminum and the results achieved are tabulated
below:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interval Finish Total Cut (Micro Time Pressure (Grams) inches)
__________________________________________________________________________
40 min. 6-/inch width 84.8 7.9 80 min. 9 -/inch width 89.0 9.4 120
min. 12-/inch width 88.0 7.5 160 min. 15-/inch width 91.5 7.4 200
min. 18-/inch width 98.5 7.5 240 min. 21-/inch width 97.5 8.5
__________________________________________________________________________
The above results are illustrated graphically in FIG. 3 of the
drawings.
EXAMPLE II
A standard, waterproof-coated abrasive backing material, 6 inches
wide, was coated on the square side with a 0.030-inch thick wet
coat of a self-cross-linking acrylic emulsion adhesive Rhoplex E-32
(Rohm and Haas)-- 197.5 parts, 0.1 percent Oxalic Acid, Aqu.-- 5
parts and Methocel 65-HG-4000 8 percent Aqu.-- 52.5 parts. A
1/16-inch thick layer of reconstituted polyurethane particle foam,
6 inches wide having a density of 15lb./ft..sup.3, a porosity of 80
percent, a 25 percent compression-deflection value of 14 p.s.i. and
an average cell opening diameter of 0.008 inch was laminated to the
adhesive-coated backings dried at room temperature and then cured
for 5 minutes at 280.degree. F.
The foam-to-backing laminate was then treated by nip-roll coating,
using two 4-inch diameter, 60 durometer rubber rolls, spaced 4
inches on centers, a throughput speed of 14 f.p.m. and employing a
40 percent total solids saturating solution. This
abrasion-resistant coating material was a mixture of a
nonheat-reactive, oil-modified phenolic plasticizing resin, a 100
percent phenolic heat-reactive, oil-soluble resin and associated
solvents, for example:
Bakelite Resin BKS-8997 (nonheat-reactive phenolic) 350 g. Bakelite
Resin CKR-1634 (heat-reactive phenolic) 237 g. High Flash Naphtha
390 g. Cellosolve 12 g.
The saturated foam-to-backing laminate was then dried in an oven at
150.degree. F. for 1 hour.
The treated foam-to-backing laminate was then nip-roll coated with
an adhesive-abrasive grain slurry, using the same equipment and
operating conditions described above. The slurry consisted of 3
parts by weight of abrasive grain and 2 parts by weight of a
mixture of a nonheat-reactive, oil-modified phenolic plasticizing
resin, a 100 percent phenolic heat-reactive oil-soluble resin and
associated solvents as follows-- 3 parts by weight of silicon
carbide 400-grit abrasive grain dispersed in 2 parts by weight of a
mixture consisting of:
Bakelite Resin BKS-8997 350 g. Bakelite Resin CKR-1634 237 g. High
Flash Naphtha 119 g. Cellosolve 12 g.
The slurry-coated laminate was cured in an oven at 220.degree. F.
for 2 hours and after curing was found to have an abrasive grain
content of about 7 lbs. of grain per sandpaper ream.
The cured laminate was then cut to 2 1/2-inch width and 60-inch
length and the ends adhesively joined to form an endless belt. The
belt was evaluated on a flat-finshing unit as to its ability to cut
and polish aluminum and the results achieved are tabulated below:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interval Finish Total Cut (Micro Time Pressure (Grams) inches)
__________________________________________________________________________
40 min. 6 -/inch width 79.0 10.0 80 min. 9 -/inch width 92.5 8.3
120 min. 12 -/inch width 80.0 7.3 160 min. 15 -/inch width 132.5
6.5 200 min. 18 -inch width 123.5 7.8 240 min. 21-/inch width 108.0
9.3
__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE III
a standard, waterproof-coated abrasive backing material, 6 inches
wide, was coated on the square side with a 0.017-inch thick wet
coating of a neoprene base solvent cement (3M EC-1300 adhesive). A
one-sixteenth inch thick layer of reconstituted polyurethane
particle foam, 6 inches wide having a density of 15 lb./ft..sup.3,
a porosity of 80 percent, a 25 percent compression-deflection value
of 14 p.s.i. and an average cell opening diameter of 0.008 inch,
was brought into contact with the wet adhesive coating and the
combination passed through a conventional textile hot-can line,
with a minimum dwell time on the 200.degree. F. heated cans of 2
1/2 minutes.
The foam-to-backing laminate was then treated by nip-roll coating,
using two 4-inch diameter, 60 durometer rubber rolls, spaced 4
inches on centers, a throughput speed of 14 f.p.m. and employing a
40 percent total solids saturating solution. The abrasion-resistant
coating material consisted of a mixture of an epoxy resin-tall oil
ester varnish, a manganese naphthenate drier and mineral spirits as
solvent--
Eip-Tex 101 (Jones Dabney) 150 parts by weight Drier VD-1846 1.5
parts by weight Sovasol - 5 (Mobil) 39 parts by weight
The saturated foam-to-backing laminate was then dried for one-half
hour at 200.degree. F.
The treated foam-to-backing laminate was then nip-roll coated with
an adhesive-abrasive grain slurry, using the same equipment and
operating conditions described above. The slurry consisted of 3
parts by weight of abrasive grain and 2 parts by weight of a
mixture of a nonheat-reactive, oil-modified phenolic plasticizing
resin, a 100 percent phenolic heat-reactive oil-soluble resin and
associated solvents as follows-- 3 parts by weight of silicon
carbide 400-grit abrasive grain dispersed in 2 parts by weight of a
mixture consisting of:
Bakelite Resin BKS-8997 350 g. Bakelite Resin CKR-1634 237 g. High
Flash Naphtha 119 g. Cellosolve 12 g.
The slurry-coated laminate was cured in an oven at 220.degree. F.
for 2 hours and after curing was found to have an abrasive grain
content of about 7 lbs. of grain per sandpaper ream.
The cured laminate was then cut to 2 1/2-inch width and 60-inch
length and the ends adhesively joined to form an endless belt. The
belt was evaluated on a flat-finishing unit as to its ability to
cut and polish aluminum and the results achieved are tabulated
below:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interval Finish Total Cut (Micro Time Pressure (Grams) inches)
__________________________________________________________________________
40 min. 6-/inch width 97.5 10.0 80 min. 9-/inch width 125.0 10.0
120 min. 12-/inch width 149.5 8.5 160 min. 15-/inch width 170.0 8.0
200 min. 18-/inch inch width 190.0 8.0 240 min. 21-/inch width
191.5 8.0
__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE IV
A standard, waterproof-coated abrasive backing material, 6 inches
wide, was coated on the square side with a 0.017 inch thick wet
coating of a neoprene base solvent cement (3M EC-1300adhesive). A
one-sixteenth inch thick layer of reconstituted polyurethane
particle foam, 6 inches wide having a density of 15 lb./ft..sup.3,
a porosity of 80 percent, a 25 percent compression-deflection value
of 14 p.s.i. and an average cell opening diameter of 0.008 inch,
was brought into contact with the wet adhesive coating and the
combination passed through a conventional textile hot-can line,
with a minimum dwell time on the 200.degree. F. heated cans of 21/2
minutes.
The foam-to-backing laminate was then treated by nip-roll coating,
using two 40 inch diameter, 60 durometer rubber rolls, spaced 4
inches on centers, a throughput speed of 14 f.p.m. and employing a
40 percent total solids saturating solution. This
abrasion-resistant coating material was a mixture of a
nonheat-reactive, oil-modified phenolic plasticizing resin, a 100
percent phenolic heat-reactive, oil-soluble resin and associated
solvents, for example:
Bakelike Resin BKS-8997 (nonheat-reactive phenolic) 350 g. Bakelite
Resin CKR-1634 (heat-reactive phenolic) 237 g. High Flash Naphtha
390 g. Cellosolve 12 g.
The saturated foam-to-backing laminate was then dried in an oven at
150.degree. F. for 1 hour.
The treated foam-to-backing laminate was then nip-roll coated with
an adhesive-abrasive grain slurry, using the same equipment and
operating conditions described above. The slurry consisted of 3
parts by weight of abrasive grain and 2 parts by weight of a
mixture of an epoxy resin-tall oil ester varnish, a manganese
napthenate drier and associated solvent-3 parts by weight of
silicon carbide abrasive grain, 400 grit, dispersed in 2 parts by
weight of a mixture comprising 150 parts by weight Epi-Tex 101, 39
parts by weight Sovasol -5 and 1.5 parts by weight Drier VD-1846.
The slurry-coated laminate was then cured in an oven as
follows:
20 minutes at 130.degree. F.
3 hours at 220.degree. F.
30 minutes at 275.degree. F.
30 minutes at 300.degree. F.
and after curing was found to have an abrasive grain content of
about 7 pounds of grain per sandpaper ream.
The cured laminate was then cut to 21/2 inches width and 60 inch
length and the ends adhesively joined to form an endless belt. The
belt was evaluated on a flat-finishing unit as to its ability to
cut and polish aluminum and the results achieved are tabulated
below:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interval Finish Total Cut (Micro Time Pressure (Grams) inches)
__________________________________________________________________________
40 min. 6-/inch width 116.5 9.0 80 min. 9-/inch width 141.0 10.0
120 min. 12-/inch width 175.0 8.8 160 min. 15-/inch width 197.0 8.8
200 min. 18-/inch width 203.5 10.0 240 min. 21-/inch width 188.5
10.7
__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE V
The following items were assembled in sandwich fashion in the order
given: a standard waterproof coated abrasive backing material, 6
inches wide, square side up; a 6 inch wide strip of low-density
polyethylene film, 6 mils thick; and a 6 inch wide, one-sixteenth
inch thick layer of reconstituted polyurethane particle foam,
having a density of 15 lb./ft..sup.3, a porosity of 80 percent, a
25 percent compression deflection value of 14 p.s.i. and an average
cell opening diameter of 0.008 inch. This combination was passed at
the rate of 5 feet per minute between two aluminum plates, heated
to approximately 350.degree. F. and separated by a three-sixteenth
inch spacing and then immediately through a set of steel rolls,
heated to approximately 360.degree. F., with a gap setting of 35
mils and geared together so that they both turned at the same
speed.
The foam-to-backing laminate was then treated by nip-roll coating,
using two 4 inch diameter, 60 durometer rubber rolls, spaced 4
inches on centers, a throughput speed of 14 f.p.m. and employing a
40 percent total solids saturating solution. This
abrasion-resistant coating material was a mixture of a
nonheat-reactive, oil-modified phenolic plasticizing resin, a 100
percent phenolic heat-reactive, oil-soluble resin and associated
solvents, for example:
Bakelike Resin BKS-8997 (nonheat-reactive phenolic) 350 g. Bakelike
Resin CKR-1634 (heat-reactive phenolic) 237 g. High Flash Naphtha
390 g. Cellosolve 12 g.
The saturated foam-to-backing laminate was then dried in an oven at
150.degree. F. for 1 hour.
The treated foam-to-backing laminate was then nip-roll coated with
an adhesive-abrasive grain slurry, using the same equipment and
operating conditions described above. The slurry consisted of 3
parts by weight of abrasive grain and 2 parts by weight of a
mixture of a nonheat-reactive, oil-modified phenolic plasticizing
resin, a 100 percent phenolic heat-reactive oil-soluble resin and
associates solvents as follows--3 parts by weight of silicon
carbide 400 grit abrasive grain dispersed in 2 parts by weight of a
mixture consisting of:
Bakelite Resin BKS-8997 350 g. Bakelite Resin CKR-1634 237 g. High
Flash Naphtha 119 g. Cellosolve 12 g.
The slurry-coated laminate was cured in an oven at 220.degree. F.
for 2 hours and after curing was found to having an abrasive grain
content of about 7 pounds of grain per sandpaper ream.
The cured laminate was then cut to 21/2 inch width and 60 inch
length and the ends adhesively joined to form an endless belt. The
belt was evaluated on a flat-finishing unit as to its ability to
cut and polish aluminum and the results achieved are tabulated
below:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interval Finish Total Cut (Micro Time Pressure (Grams) inches)
__________________________________________________________________________
40 min. 6-/inch width 53.0 8.5 80 min. 9-/inch width 84.5 7.7 120
min. 12-/inch width 98.5 7.5 160 min. 15-/inch width 109.0 7.5 200
min. 18-/inch width 111.0 8.8 240 min. 21-/inch width 92.5 13.3 280
min. 24-/inch width 56.5 25.0
__________________________________________________________________________
This method of lamination to form the backing structure to proved
to be satisfactory. Cut and finish results obtained were comparable
to those obtained with the other examples above.
EXAMPLE VI
A standard, waterproof-coated abrasive backing material, 6 inches
wide, was coated on the square side with a 0.017 inch thick wet
coating of a neoprene base solvent cement (3M EC-1300 adhesive). A
one-sixteenth inch thick layer of reconstituted polyurethane
particle foam, 6 inches wide having a density of 15 lb.,/ft..sup.3,
a porosity of 80 percent, a 25 percent compression-deflection value
of 14 p.s.i. and an average cell opening diameter of 0.008 inch,
was brought into contact with the wet adhesive coating and the
combination passed through a conventional textile hot-can line,
with a minimum dwell time on the 200.degree. F. heated cans of 21/2
minutes.
The foam-to-backing laminate was then treated by nip-roll coating,
using two 33/8 diameter steel rolls, operating under constant
pressure of approximately 50 pounds per inch width, a throughout
speed of 4 f.p.m. and a saturant emulsion comprising a mixture of
an epoxy resin, a polyamide and water--
Epon Resin 828 100 g. Versamide 140 100 g. Water 300 g.
prepared as follows: mix upon Resin 828 and Versamide, then with
rapid stirring, slowly add water until an emulsion is formed, The
treated foam-to-backing laminate was then cured at 220.degree. F.
for 2 hours.
The treated foam-to-backing laminate was then nip-roll coated with
an adhesive-abrasive grain slurry, using the same equipment and
operating conditions described above. The slurry consisted of 3
parts by weight of abrasive grain and 2 parts by weight of a
mixture of a nonheat-reactive, oil-modified phenolic plasticizing
resin, a 100 percent phenolic heat-reactive oil-soluble resin and
associated solvents as follows--3 parts by weight of silicon
carbide 400 grit abrasive grain dispersed in 2 parts by weight of a
mixture consisting of:
Bakelite Resin BKS-8997 350 g. Bakelite Resin CKR-1634 237 g. High
Flash Naphtha 119 g. Cellosolve 12 g.
The slurry-coated laminate was cured in an oven at 220.degree. F.
for 2 hours and after curing was found to having an abrasive grain
content of about 7 pounds of grain per sandpaper ream.
The cured laminate was then cut to 21/2inch width and 60 inch
length and the ends adhesively joined to form an endless belt. The
belt was evaluated on a flat-finishing unit as to its ability to
cut and polish aluminum and the results achieved are tabulated
below:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interval Finish Total Cut 13 (Micro Time Pressure (Grams) inches)
__________________________________________________________________________
40 min. 6-/inch width 61 12 80 min. 9-/inch width 70 14 120 min.
12-/inch width 102 15 160 min. 15-/inch width 108 7 200 min.
18-/inch width 103 7 240 min. 21-/inch width 101 13
__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE VII
A standard, waterproof-coated abrasive backing material, six inches
wide, was coated on the square side with a 0.017 inch thick wet
coating of a neoprene base solvent cement (3M EC-1300 adhesive). A
one-sixteenth inch thick layer of reconstituted polyurethane
particle foam, 6 inches wide having a density of 15 lb.,/ft..sup.3,
a porosity of 80 percent, a 25 percent compression-deflection value
of 14 p.s.i. and an average cell opening diameter of 0.008 inch,
was brought into contact with the wet adhesive coating and the
combination passed through a conventional textile hot-can line,
with a minimum dwell time on the 200.degree. F. heated cans of 21/2
minutes.
The foam-to-backing laminate was then treated by roll coating,
employing as the abrasion-resistant coating a 10 percent total
solids, polyvinylidene chloride emulsion, (DARAN 210 emulsion,
reduced in total solids to 10 percent by the addition of water). A
dry weight addition to the foam-to-backing laminate of about 6
pounds per sandpaper ream of polyvinylidene chloride solids after
curing the saturated laminate at 220.degree. F. for 2 hours
resulted.
The treated foam-to-backing laminate was then nip-roll coated with
an adhesive-abrasive grain slurry, using the same equipment and
operating conditions described above. The slurry consisted of 3
parts by weight of abrasive grain and 2 parts by weight of a
mixture of a nonheat-reactive, oil-modified phenolic plasticizing
resin, a 100 percent phenolic heat-reactive oil-soluble resin and
associated solvents as follows--3 parts by weight of silicon
carbide 400 grit abrasive grain dispersed in 2 parts by weight of a
mixture consisting of:
Bakelite Resin BKS-8997 350 g. Bakelite Resin CKR-1634 237 g. High
Flash Naphtha 119 g. Cellosolve 12 g.
The slurry-coated laminate was cured in an oven at 220.degree. F.
for 2 hours and after curing was found to have an abrasive grain
content of about 7 pounds of grain per sandpaper ream.
The cured laminate was then cut to 21/2 inch width and 60 inch
length and the ends adhesively joined to form an endless belt. The
belt was evaluated on a flat-finishing unit as to its ability to
cut and polish aluminum and the results achieved are tabulated
below:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interval Finish Total Cut (Micro Time Pressure (Grams) inches)
__________________________________________________________________________
40 min. 6-/inch width 42.5 21 80 min. 9-/inch width 51.5 15 120
min. 12-/inch width 63.0 9 160 min. 15-/inch width 80.0 7 200 min.
18-/inch width 15.0 9 240 min. 21-/inch width 80.0 7
__________________________________________________________________________
The produce of example I was tested in belt form against a
conventional cork belt-coated abrasive product of the same grit
size made in accordance with U.S. Pat. No. 2,542,058 (heretofore
generally recognized as the best commercially available abrasive
polishing material). The belts were run on a coated abrasive belt
flat-polishing machine (using a 20 durometer contact wheel and set
for 21/2 inch .times. 60 inch belts) under identical conditions and
on identical workpieces. The workpieces in each instance were 2
inch .times. 8 inches plates of one-sixteenth inch thick -2024
aluminum. Belt speed was 4,000 surface feet per minute.
Substantially better finish, i.e., 8 to 12 micro inches, vs. 17-40
micro inches for the cork belt was obtained as well as greatly
increased cut (556.7 grams vs. 124 grams).
A grit binder (in the normal sense of an adhesive) is not required
where the primary use of the material is buffing, In such
instances, using the same slurry type application as for the grain
adhesive, a mixture of an oil, oil-in-water or grease lubricating
aid and extremely fine abrasive such as the commercially available
spray-type buffing compounds is applied on and in the resilient
structure. A preferred type of this material is the TP179 or TP69
compound referred to as "Liquid Tripoli" and produced by Formax
Manufacturing Company of Detroit, Mich. Quantitative data on
strictly buffing results cannot be obtained exactly since the
evaluation of a buff finish is largely aesthetic, However, results
of this product used solely for buffing having been evaluated by
skilled operators and the results have been considered
outstanding.
The theory of cushioning the abrasive grain to give a better finish
is, of course, not new. The reason why the material of the present
invention works so much better than previously available material
is not thoroughly understood. At this time it is theorized that the
density-porosity range specified in combination with the
compressibility makes the most difference in result. It is
essential that a composite be used in order to achieve the desired
result. The incorporation of the abrasion-resistant coating has
been found to produce in the neighborhood of 27 percent more stock
removal in the same period of time while giving up to 36% better
surface finish than the same resilient laminate structure without
the abrasion-resistant coat. These products will conform much more
readily to surface irregularities than will presently available
products and, of course, produce the better finish and improved cut
shown by the tables above. The product does not streak the
workpiece and has a useful life far in excess of conventional
materials. Life of the abrasion-resistant treated material is
several times that of the untreated material.
While the abrasive is preferably distributed through the porous
structure as described above in connection with the preferred
embodiment, it is within the scope of the present invention to coat
the abrasive separately from the adhesive, as by dropping it in a
gravity coating technique, whereby the abrasive grain is
concentrated substantially entirely upon the exterior surface of
the porous structure. In such instance the abrasive density is
clearly at a maximum at the surface of the porous structure and
such construction is contemplated by the terminology "ranging from
a minimum...to a maximum..." in the appended claims.
Obviously, many variations and alterations may be made, as
indicated, without departing from the spirit and scope of the
invention disclosed herein so that only such limitations should be
imposed as are presented in the following claims.
* * * * *