U.S. patent number 3,605,108 [Application Number 04/867,150] was granted by the patent office on 1971-09-14 for platform stabilizer for pole-mounted antenna.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated. Invention is credited to Arthur B. Crawford.
United States Patent |
3,605,108 |
Crawford |
September 14, 1971 |
PLATFORM STABILIZER FOR POLE-MOUNTED ANTENNA
Abstract
A pole-mounted directional microwave antenna secured to a
platform is disclosed. The platform is rotatably mounted atop the
pole so that the elevation angle of the beam axis of the antenna
may be controlled. A stabilizing outrigger rod is mounted parallel
to the pole, and the rod is linked to the platform. Spacers between
the pole and the rod maintain a fixed separation, and when the pole
is deflected in a plane containing the beam axis the rod is
deflected in a parallel manner causing the platform to rotate so
that the beam axis remains parallel to its undeflected orientation,
thus automatically compensating for wind-induced pole sway in the
direction of propagation. Three rods are used to compensate for
sway in any direction.
Inventors: |
Crawford; Arthur B. (Fair
Haven, NJ) |
Assignee: |
Bell Telephone Laboratories,
Incorporated (Murray Hill, NJ)
|
Family
ID: |
25349217 |
Appl.
No.: |
04/867,150 |
Filed: |
October 17, 1969 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
343/882; 52/40;
52/651.07; 343/890 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H01Q
1/005 (20130101); E04H 12/24 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H01Q
1/00 (20060101); E04H 12/24 (20060101); E04H
12/00 (20060101); H01q 003/02 () |
Field of
Search: |
;52/40,301,649
;343/343,DIG.2,882,890 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Lieberman; Eli
Claims
I claim:
1. An antenna mounting structure comprising,
an antenna package rigidly affixed to a platform,
said package having antenna means for directionally coupling with
electromagnetic radiation,
a pole affixed at one end to a foundation,
a universal joint coupling the other end of said pole to said
platform,
three stabilizer rods external and parallel to said pole affixed to
said foundation surrounding said pole at 120.degree. intervals,
said rods having structural properties such that they deflect
similarly to said pole,
ball joints coupling each of said rods to said platform, and
a plurality of spacers positioned at various heights along the
length of said pole for maintaining a constant separation between
said pole and each of said rods for their common lengths, whereby
deflection of said pole causes corresponding deflection of said
rods and compensating rotation of said platform so that the
orientation of said platform is restricted to parallel planes and a
fixed direction of coupling of said antenna means is
maintained.
2. An antenna mounting structure as claimed in claim 1 wherein said
antenna package is cylindrical and said platform forms the lower
end of said cylindrical package and wherein a cylindrical skirt
geometrically similar to said cylindrical package is attached to
said platform and symmetrically displaced with respect to said
package about said platform.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to antenna mounting structures and, more
particularly, to mechanisms for continuously correcting the
orientation of a narrow beam antenna to compensate for motion of
the mast on which it is mounted.
In order to reduce interference in radio transmission systems
omnidirectional antennas have been replaced by highly directive
ones. As a consequence, successful transmission from one station to
another requires precise alignment of the two antennas and
continuous maintenance of this alignment. In the past, steel
lattice structures fixed to massive concrete foundations have been
constructed to rigidly support the required antennas. These large
structures do in fact sway slightly in the wind, but the beam
widths of the antennas used are wide enough that even under
conditions of sway the radiated beam is intercepted by the next
antenna in the transmission path. As narrower beam and higher gain
antennas are used, even the minor sway of a 200-foot lattice
structure may cause a 0.1.degree. beam to miss the next antenna.
For this reason, as well as others, expensive lattice towers may be
replaced in the future with simpler and cheaper structures such as
single vertical poles.
The pole-mounted antennas would, of course, experience substantial
sway and continuous reorientation would be required to maintain
alignment between consecutive antennas in the transmission path. An
electromagnetic servomechanism could be used to stabilize the
antenna orientation but this would add greatly to the complexity,
expense and maintenance of the pole assembly. For structural
reasons, the pole could not be as high as the older lattice towers
and hence many more repeater stations would be required. Thus,
expensive stabilizing mechanisms would mitigate the value of the
inexpensive pole mounting.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the present invention, an inexpensive stabilizer
is provided for a pole-mounted highly directional narrow beam
antenna. The orientation of the beam in elevation angle is
controlled by the orientation of a surface in the antenna package
which is mounted atop the pole. This surface, which may be the
supporting platform of the antenna package, is rotatably connected
to the pole assembly and when wind loading or other external forces
cause the pole to bend or deflect in a plane containing the beam
axis a mechanical linkage converts this deflection into linear
motion which is translated into a compensatory rotation of the
surface.
The mechanical linkage may be provided by an outrigger rod mounted
parallel to the pole in a plane containing both the pole and the
beam axis. The outrigger is periodically spaced from the pole so
that deflection of the pole causes a parallel deflection of the
outrigger rod which is rotatably fixed to the platform surface. In
this manner, deflection of the rod causes rotation of the platform.
An alternative linkage using a belt and pulley arrangement is
disclosed in copending application Ser. No. 867,181 filed on an
even date herewith by A. A. Penzias and assigned to the assignee
hereof.
The bending of the pole will of necessity cause the altitude of the
antenna to be reduced but the compensatory rotation of the surface
will align the beam along a path parallel to the original beam path
for the undeflected condition. Reducing the height of the beam axis
even on the order of a foot would not impair coupling at an antenna
a mile or more away, whereas the rotation of the elevation of the
beam axis by an angle of only 1.degree. would cause a narrow beam
to miss the next antenna completely as it would either pass above
or below the aperture.
Deflection of the pole in a plane perpendicular to beam axis will
not cause any angular change of the beam axis but will merely cause
it to be displaced to the right or the left and it will, as in the
case of the reduced height, still intercept the next antenna.
Therefore, no compensation is required in this direction. However,
conventional repeater stations would have a number of antennas
facing in two or more directions mounted on the pole and it would
be desirable to use three equally spaced outrigger rods to
continuously stabilize the platform in response to forces in any
direction, rather than provide antenna stabilization for each
antenna individually.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
FIG. 1 is a pictorial representation of a conventional pole-mounted
antenna illustrating the deflection of the beam axis caused by
deflection of the pole. FIG. 1A is a cross-sectional view of
conventional antenna package suitable for use with the pole-mounted
antenna of FIG. 1.
FIG. 2 is a pictorial representation of a pole-mounted antenna
modified in accordance with the invention to correct for deflection
in a single plane.
FIG. 3 is a pictorial representation of a pole-mounted antenna
modified in accordance with the invention to correct for deflection
of the pole in all directions.
FIG. 3A is a top view of the antenna package of FIG. 3.
FIG. 4 is a view of a spacing structure suitable for use in the
embodiment of FIG. 3.
FIG. 5 is a pictorial representation of a modified form of the
embodiment of FIG. 3.
Elements common to various figures are designated by similar
reference numerals.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
FIG. 1 illustrates antenna package 10 mounted atop pole 11. Package
10 shown in FIG. 1A contains conventional narrow beam antenna
apparatus which may comprise, for instance, a parabolic reflector
21 and a plane reflector 22 which is permanently positioned within
package 10 to reflect the parallel waves from parabolic reflector
21 so that they pass through a weather-covered aperture 23 in the
wall of package 10 to form a beam having an axis 12. The
illustrated structure is assumed to be conventional and therefore
antenna feeds which would be located at F, the focal point of
parabolic reflector 21, and their connection to appropriate
electronic circuits, such as a receiver, transmitter or repeater,
are not shown. The antenna apparatus may, of course, be of the type
without plane reflector 22 in which case parabolic reflector 21
would be positioned to radiate a beam directly through aperture 23.
What is essential to the present invention is that the antenna
couples with electromagnetic radiation along a narrow beam having
an axis 12, whose orientation is determined by the orientation of
package 10.
Pole 11 and package 10 are preferably cylindrical in order to
prevent a wind-caused twisting moment about the axis of pole 11.
However, if pole 11 is rigidly secured to the ground by foundation
13, a force or a component of force may cause the pole to bend and
the dotted image in FIG. 1 is an exaggerated illustration of
deflection of the pole in the plane containing beam axis 12. As can
be seen, a force component from left to right will cause the pole
to deflect to position 11' and package 10 will be tilted to
position 10'. Beam axis 12 will lie along a line 12' which is
displaced from the original undeflected orientation by an angle
.phi.. It is evident that if a pole supporting an antenna in a
radio relay system is deflected in this manner, the beam may
intercept the ground and not the next antenna which is aligned with
the original orientation of beam axis 12. A force from right to
left will cause the opposite effect and the displaced beam axis
would lie above the original orientation of beam 12.
Fig. 2 illustrates an assembly similar to that of FIG. 1 except
that it has been modified in accordance with one embodiment of the
invention by the addition of outrigger rods 16 and 17. Platform 14,
the lower end surface of cylindrical package 10 is secured by a
rotatable coupling 15 such as a hinge which supports package 10 and
prevents it from twisting about the axis of pole 11 but allows it
to rotate about an axis perpendicular to the plane defined by pole
11 and beam axis 12. This plane is, of course, a vertical plane
when pole 11 is mounted vertically. Pole 11 is fixed to foundation
13 at 13c. Outrigger rods 16 and 17 are mounted parallel to pole 11
and fixed to foundation 13 at 13a and 13b, respectively and are
pinned to platform surface 14 at 18 and 19. Spacers 20 maintain
rods 16 and 17 in this parallel position. Under a force or
component of force from left to right, for instance, pole 11
deflects to position 11', but if the rods' lengths do not change,
spacers 20 force rods 16 and 17 to deflect to parallel positions
16' and 17'. Since rods 16 and 17 are pinned to platform 14, the
parallelogram 13c -15-19-13b is deflected to a shape
13c-15'-19'-13b, the opposite sides of which are parallel and hence
platform surface 14 is displaced to position 14" and is maintained
parallel to its original attitude. It is noted that theoretically
only a single outrigger rod such as 17 is needed to accomplish the
stabilization of platform 14. Comparison of FIGS. 1 and 2
illustrates that by maintaining platform 14 essentially parallel to
its original position under the condition of deflection, beam axis
12 lies along the line 12" essentially parallel to the undeflected
orientation of axis 12. The beam will therefore intercept the next
antenna in the transmission path whereas it would not if the beam
were along path 12' as in FIG. 1.
The size of the outrigger rods is determined by the turning moment
at coupling 15, the height of pole 11 and the allowable angle of
deflection of the radio beam. This will be discussed later in
reference to another embodiment in the invention. FIGS. 3 and 3A
illustrate two antenna packages 25 and 26 mounted atop pole 27. In
a commercial application it would be expected that repeater
stations would have two or more antenna packages and beam axes,
such as 28 and 29 of packages 25 and 26 respectively, would be
displaced from one another as is depicted in FIG. 3A. Hence,
correction for force components parallel to both axes 28 and 29 is
required. It is preferable therefore to stabilize combined packages
25 and 26 in response to components of force in any direction and
three outrigger rods 31, 32 and 33 are mounted parallel to pole 27,
displaced at intervals conveniently 120.degree. apart and spaced by
spacers 34. Any force may be resolved into components in the planes
of pole 27 and one of the rods 31, 32 or 33. Each rod will cause
stabilization of platform 30 in one axis as was discussed above
with reference to FIG. 2. Joint 35 is a universal joint which
allows such rotation but prevents twisting of platform 30 about the
axis of pole 27. Joints 36, 37 and 38 connecting outrigger rods 31,
32 and 33, respectively to platform surface 30 could be ball
joints. Pole 27 is rigidly connected to the ground at 40 and each
of the rods 31, 32 and 33 are rigidly connected at 40a, 40b and
40c, respectively, by couplings which are preferably adjustable in
height so as to permit leveling of platform 30 for purposes of
alignment.
The size and characteristics of outrigger rods 31, 32 and 33 are
determined by the turning moment M of the combined antenna package
about joint 35 and the acceptable deflection of the beam in
accordance with the following relationship:
M=Ph (1)
and for three equally spaced rods
where P is the external (wind) force per unit area times the
projected area of the package;
h is the effective moment arm of P;
.theta. is the acceptable angle between the deflected and
undeflected beam axis positions;
L is the length of the pole from the ground to the joint at the
platform surface;
R is the distance of the rods from the center of the pole;
E is the modulus of elasticity of the material forming the rods,
and
A is the cross-sectional area of each rod.
FIG. 4 illustrates a preferred arrangement for providing spacing
between pole 27 and the outrigger rods 31, 32 and 33 at various
heights along pole 27. With reference to rod 31, for example, a
pair of spacers 43 and 44 which exhibit essentially no compression
or expansion along their axes are pinned to common point 45 on the
exterior surface of rod 31. Each of the rods is then pinned to the
exterior surface of pole 27 at points 46 and 47 120.degree.
separated. Pairs of spacers are similarly provided for each of the
other rods 32 and 33.
FIG. 5 illustrates a modification of FIG. 3 in which a hollow skirt
42 identical in size and shape to the combined form of packages 25
and 26 is mounted to platform 30 symmetrically oriented with
respect to packages 25 and 26 about universal joint 35. This
modification which applies equally to the embodiment of FIG. 2 will
balance the wind load P on the antenna package and eliminate the
turning moment at joint 35. This reduces the angle .theta. or
permits the use of rods with smaller cross sections A.
In all cases it is to be understood that the above-described
arrangements are merely illustrative of a small number of the many
possible applications of the principles of the invention. Numerous
and varied other arrangements in accordance with these principles
may readily be devised by those skilled in the art without
departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
* * * * *