U.S. patent number 3,604,645 [Application Number 04/883,758] was granted by the patent office on 1971-09-14 for inferential mass rate control system for paper refiners.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Beloit Corporation. Invention is credited to Marion A. Keyes, IV.
United States Patent |
3,604,645 |
Keyes, IV |
September 14, 1971 |
INFERENTIAL MASS RATE CONTROL SYSTEM FOR PAPER REFINERS
Abstract
An inferentially derived kilowatt-hour-per-ton signal is
provided by the measurement of differential temperature and
consistency of the fluid stock flowing through the refiner. This
signal is used to the motor that relatively positions the beater
elements of the refiner to maintain a substantially uniform power
consumption. Also, provision is made for modifying the action of
the control motor in accordance with a given stock property of the
stock flowing through the refiner to make prompt adjustment for
changes in the particular stock property.
Inventors: |
Keyes, IV; Marion A. (South
Beloit, IL) |
Assignee: |
Beloit Corporation (Beloit,
WI)
|
Family
ID: |
25383283 |
Appl.
No.: |
04/883,758 |
Filed: |
December 10, 1969 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
241/37 |
Current CPC
Class: |
D21D
1/002 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
D21D
1/00 (20060101); B02c 007/14 () |
Field of
Search: |
;241/37,63,64
;162/253,254 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
1815155 |
July 1931 |
Lewellen et al. |
2727694 |
December 1955 |
Helmick, Jr. et al. |
3078051 |
February 1963 |
Patterson |
|
Primary Examiner: Custer, Jr.; Granville Y.
Claims
I claim:
1. In combination with a refiner for processing fluid paper stock
which includes a pair of relatively rotatable and axially movable
refining elements, a drive motor for relatively rotating said
elements and a control motor for axially shifting one of said
elements with respect to the other, a control system comprising
means providing a signal indicative of the rise in temperature of
the stock flowing through said refiner, means providing a signal
indicative of the consistency of said stock, means providing a
signal representative of the ratio of said first signal with
respect to said second signal to provide an output signal
inferentially representative of the energy per unit mass required
by said refiner for the particular temperature rise of the stock
passing therethrough, means for comparing said output signal with a
set point signal which is representative of the desired energy per
unit mass, and means for controlling said control motor in
accordance with any difference between said output signal and said
set point signal.
2. The combination set forth in claim 1 in which said comparing
means includes a first temperature transmitter for sensing the
temperature of the stock entering the refiner, a second temperature
transmitter for sensing the temperature of the stock leaving the
refiner, and a comparator for comparing the signal from said first
temperature transmitter with the temperature for said second
transmitter to provide said signal representative of the rise in
temperature of the stock passing through said refiner.
3. The combination set forth in claim 2 in which said means
providing a signal representative of the consistency of said stock
includes a transmitter for providing a signal in accordance with
the consistency of the stock, said last-mentioned means further
including means for multiplying the signal provided by said
consistency transmitter by a predetermined constant to provide said
signal representative of the consistency of said stock, whereby
said means providing a ratio of said signals furnishes an output
signal having the inferential relationship that is representative
of the energy per unit mass consumed by the refiner as said stock
passes therethrough.
4. The combination set forth in claim 1 including means for
providing a measured signal indicative of a given stock property
and additionally controlling said control motor in accordance with
any difference between said measured stock property signal and a
set point signal representative of a desired stock property.
5. The combination set forth in claim 4 in which said
last-mentioned means includes a transmitter for measuring the given
stock property and a comparator for comparing said measured stock
property signal with a desired stock property signal to provide an
error signal in accordance with any difference therebetween.
6. The combination set forth in claim 5 including a comparator for
comparing said error signal with said signal representative of any
difference between said output signal and said first-mentioned set
point signal.
7. In combination with a refiner for processing fluid paper stock
which includes a pair of relatively rotatable and axially movable
refining elements, a dive motor for relatively rotating said
elements and a control motor for axially shifting one of said
elements with respect to the other, a control system comprising a
first temperature transmitter for sensing the temperature of the
stock entering said refiner to produce a first temperature signal,
a second temperature transmitter for sensing the temperature of the
stock leaving said refiner to produce a second temperature signal,
a first comparator for comparing said first and second temperature
signals to provide a first error signal representative of any
difference between said first and second temperature signals, a
consistency transmitter for sensing the consistency of the stock
flowing through said refiner to produce a signal indicative of the
consistency of said stock, means for dividing said error signal by
said consistency signal to provide an output signal inferentially
representative of the energy per unit mass required by said
refiner, a second comparator for comparing said output signal with
a desired energy per bone-dry ton signal to provide a second error
signal, and means for controlling said control motor in accordance
with the value of said second error signal.
8. The combination set forth in claim 7 including a transmitter for
providing a measured signal indicative of a given stock property of
the stock flowing through said refiner, a comparator for comparing
said measured stock property signal with a set point signal
representative of a desired stock property to provide a third error
signal representative of any difference therebetween and an
additional comparator for comparing said second and their error
signals to provide an additional error signal, said additional
error signal controlling said control motor.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to refiners for processing fluid
paper stock, and pertains more particularly to a control system
utilizing differential temperature and consistency data for
determining the load imposed upon the refiner.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Attention is directed to U.S. Pat. No. 3,309,031, issued Mar. 24,
1967 to Richard F. McMahon et al. for MATERIAL WORKING APPARATUS,
which patent is owned by the present assignee. The control system
described and claimed in said McMahon et al. patent has performed
exceptionally well. However, the one outstanding shortcoming of the
McMahon et al. structure is that it is only flow sensitive and does
not take into account changes in the consistency of the stock
passing through the refiner. The present invention makes use of
both consistency and the difference in temperature, as well as
deviations in a given stock property from a desired value to assure
a relatively constant power consumption.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is highly desirable in refining paper stock to maintain the
power consumption of the drive motor substantially constant. Where
only the temperature rise between the stock entering the refiner
and the stock being discharged from the refiner is employed, this
does not allow a rapid compensation for such important factors as
the consistency of the flowing stock. Accordingly, one object of
the present invention is to provide a control system for paper
stock refiners that will be sensitive or responsive to both
temperature and consistency.
Another object of the invention is to provide a control system of
the foregoing character that can be adapted so as to additionally
compensate for changes in a selected stock property such as
freeness, average fiber length and the like.
A still further object of the invention is to provide a control
system that will be economical, yet sufficiently accurate so that
the power consumed by the drive motor for the refiner will remain
fairly constant, at least sufficiently constant, to warrant its
adoption as a practical solution to the problem.
Yet another object of the invention is to obviate the need for
relatively costly electrical measuring equipment, the present
invention determining a simulated power relationship with respect
to the energy required per ton of bone-dry stock without resort to
more expensive and sophisticated power-measuring
instrumentation.
Still another object of the invention is to minimize the need for
computing equipment, it being feasible to employ only a simple
divider and multiplier that will assist in providing the
appropriate simulation of energy per ton.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
The sole FIGURE illustrating the invention is largely in block
form, although typical refining apparatus has been superimposed
thereon in a schematic or diagrammatic form.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Referring now in detail to the drawing, a typical refiner has been
denoted generally by the reference numeral 10. The exemplary form
is of the so-called disc variety and includes a stationary beater
disc or refining element 12 and a rotary beater disc or refining
element 14. The invention, though, is susceptible to use with a
conical plug-type refiner, this type of refiner generally being
known as a Jordan refiner in which a rotatable conical plug is
moved axially with respect to a complemental shell in which the
conical plug is contained.
The refiner 10 as illustrated in the drawing has a drive shaft 16
connected with the rotary element 14 so as to produce the required
rotation of this particular element. Inasmuch as the invention is
regarded as an improvement over the previously referred McMahon et
al. patent, reference can be made to this patent for further
explanation as to the construction of the refiner. In the McMahon
et al. patent, a pneumatic motor is referred to as the means for
positioning the movable beater element with respect to the
stationary element; in the situation at hand, it is planned that an
electric motor 20 will perform this function. Such motor may well
function as described in U.S. Pat. No. 1,933,814, issued on Nov. 7,
1933 to Darcy E. Lewellen et al. for STOCK CONSISTENCY CONTROL.
Although not of recent innovation, the said Lewellen et al. patent
is additionally pertinent because it deals with a Jordan refiner
and very succinctly shows a motor for rotating a threaded shaft
that is employed for positioning the conical plug with respect to
the shell enclosing same.
As far as the present drawing is concerned, it will be appreciated
that the fluid stock to be refined enters the refiner 10 via an
inlet conduit 22 and leaves or is discharged through an outlet
conduit 24. For the purpose of sensing the temperature T.sub.1 of
the incoming stock there is a temperature transmitter 26 that
provides a signal representing this temperature. Similarly, a
temperature transmitter 28 senses the outlet temperature T.sub.2 of
the stock after it has passed through the refiner 10 to provide a
second signal that reflects the value of this higher temperature.
It will be appreciated that the rise in temperature .DELTA.T, that
is T.sub.2 -T.sub.1, is indicative or representative of the work
performed on the stock by the beater elements 12, 14. This is fully
explained in said McMahon et al. U.S. Pat. No. 3,309,031.
The temperature representing signal T.sub.1 is delivered to a
summing junction or comparator circuit 30 having first and second
input terminals 30a and 30b. More specifically, the temperature
transmitter 26 has its output side connected to the input terminal
30a of the comparator 30, whereas the transmitter 28 supplies the
second input terminal 30b with a signal representative of the
temperature T.sub.2 . Any difference between the values of the
signals impressed on the input terminals 30a, 30b appears at an
output terminal 30c of the comparator 30. In other words, any
difference between the two temperatures T.sub.2 and T.sub.1 is
forwarded via the output terminal 30c as a .DELTA.T signal.
Although the express purpose therefor will not be manifest from the
description that has been given up to this point, it will be noted
that a calculator in the form of a divider 32 has a pair of input
terminals 32a and 32b and an output terminal 32c. The divider 32
merely provides a ratio of the signal delivered via its input
terminal 32a with respect to the signal delivered via the input
terminal 32b which latter signal is described below.
The signal that is fed to the divider 32 over the input terminal
32b is furnished by a consistency transmitter 34 that provides a
signal indicative of the consistency of the incoming stock
delivered through the conduit 22. This signal is forwarded to a
multiplier 36 that multiplies the signal by an appropriate constant
which will cause the divider 32 to produce a proper output or ratio
signal at the terminal 32c which will be representative of the
energy per unit mass of stock. More specifically, it will be
perceived that the following equation exists:
(T.sub.2 -T.sub.1).times.52.7/C=KWH/T
where:
KWH = energy, kilowatt hours
T.sub.1 = inlet temperature, .degree. F.
T.sub.2 = outlet temperature, .degree. F.
C = consistency percent
T = bone-dry stock, tons
whereas the ratio or output signal from the divider 32 which is
forwarded via the terminal 32c is representative of the inferential
energy per unit mass, more specifically kilowatt hours per ton,
this signal is to be compared with a set point signal
representative of the desired energy/bone-dry ton, more
specifically, KWH/bone-dry ton. Accordingly, a summing junction or
comparator circuit 38 is employed which has a pair of input
terminals 38a, 38b and an output terminal 38c, the ratio or output
signal from the divider 32 being impressed on the input terminal
38a. The set point is applied via the input terminal 38b. In this
way, any difference between these input signals appears as an error
signal on the output terminal 38c and when processed by a
controller 40 is delivered to still another summing junction or
comparator circuit 42 having a pair of input terminals 42a, 42b and
an output terminal 42c.
The signal impressed on the input terminal 42b will presently be
referred to. However, at this time it will be seen that the output
terminal 42c of the comparator 42 is connected to a refiner
adjustment controller labeled 44 which is responsible for providing
the control motor 20 with the proper amount of power so that the
axially shiftable beater or refining element 14 is properly
positioned so that the desired amount of load is shouldered by the
refiner 10.
Focusing attention now on a feedforward correction that will assist
in effecting the requisite adjustment of the refining element 14
via the control motor 20, there is a stock property transmitter 46
that provides a signal representative of a given stock property
such as freeness, average fiber length and the like. This measured
stock property signal can merely be identified as Z.sub.M and this
signal is delivered to a summing junction or comparator circuit 48
having its input terminal 48a connected to the transmitter 46. A
second input terminal 48b belonging to the comparator 48 introduces
a set point signal representative of the desired stock property
which signal has been assigned the character Z.sub.D. Any
difference between the measured signal Z.sub.M and the desired
signal Z.sub.D appears as an error signal at the output terminal
48c of the comparator 48. When processed by the controller 50, the
signal that results is forwarded to the input terminal 42b where it
is compared with the signal forwarded from the controller 40.
Hence, any difference between the values of the signals from the
controllers 40 and 50 will be differenced by the comparator 42 and
the ensuing signal will be delivered via the output terminal 42c to
the refiner adjustment controller 44 and in turn this controlling
determines the energization of the control motor 20 to effect
proper positioning of the refiner element 14 with respect to the
element 12.
It will be appreciated that in actual practice, the functions
performed by the comparator 38 and the controller 40 can be
combined into a single controller that is designed to perform the
desired comparison. The same thing holds true for the comparator 48
and the controller 50. Such controllers are commercially available.
However, by showing the components 38, 40, 48 and 50 separately it
is believed to facilitate an understanding of the invention.
Having presented the foregoing description, largely with a
considerable portion of the operation included therein, only a
brief additional description need be given which is directed
exclusively to the operation of the depicted system. In this
regard, it will be appreciated that a .DELTA.T temperature
differential is derived via the temperature transmitters 26, 28 and
this is specifically accomplished with the comparator 30. The
resulting signal appearing on the output terminal 30c is
representative of the difference or .DELTA.T temperature and hence
the work performed on the fluid stock flowing through the refiner
10.
The consistency transmitter 34, together with the multiplier 36,
provides a signal that is introduced via the input terminal 32b to
the divider 32 so that the output signal from the divider reflects
the proper value which is representative of the energy per unit
mass. Since this measured signal may frequently, or at least
randomly, deviate from a desired value, the measured value is
compared with a desired value or set point signal by means of the
comparator 38. The error or difference signal from the terminal 38c
of the comparator 38 is processed by the controller 40 and its
output is in turn compared with whatever signal appears at the
output side of the controller 50. It will be recalled that the
controller 50 receives any difference or error signal between the
measured stock property signal Z.sub. M and the desired stock
property signal Z.sub.D. Hence, the actual energization of the
control motor 20 is influenced by the values of two separate and
distinct loops, the net effect of the two loops being determined by
the comparator 42 and the resulting signal that is forwarded
therefrom to the controller 44.
* * * * *