U.S. patent number 3,599,847 [Application Number 04/846,083] was granted by the patent office on 1971-08-17 for belt-suspended hammer holder.
Invention is credited to Gideon R. Danielson.
United States Patent |
3,599,847 |
Danielson |
August 17, 1971 |
BELT-SUSPENDED HAMMER HOLDER
Abstract
The hammer holder is an L-shaped bracket having a vertical
portion and a horizontal portion. Holes in the vertical portion
permit it to be suspended from a belt or apron string. The
horizontal portion has a U-shaped opening for receiving the shank
of a hammer head. Lugs at the entrance of the opening prevent
sideways removal of the hammer head. The external edges of the
horizontal portion are diagonal, causing the hammer handle to rock
against the leg of the user.
Inventors: |
Danielson; Gideon R. (Geneva,
IL) |
Family
ID: |
25296892 |
Appl.
No.: |
04/846,083 |
Filed: |
July 30, 1969 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
224/673;
224/904 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B25H
3/006 (20130101); A45F 5/021 (20130101); A45F
5/02 (20130101); B25H 3/00 (20130101); A45F
2200/0575 (20130101); A45F 2200/0566 (20130101); Y10S
224/904 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
A45F
5/02 (20060101); A45F 5/00 (20060101); B25H
3/00 (20060101); A45f 005/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;224/5,25R,5A ;211/6T
;248/309 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Forlenza; Gerald M.
Assistant Examiner: Mannix; John
Claims
I claim:
1. A belt supported claw hammer holder comprising an L-shaped
bracket having a vertical portion and a horizontal portion, the
horizontal portion being bifurcated and providing two fixed,
nonresilient legs, lugs at the outer end of each leg extending
toward each other, said lugs cooperating with said legs to define
an opening adapted to receive the shank of a hammer head, the
distance between said lugs being less than the corresponding
dimension of said hammer head shank and greater than the smaller
dimension of the throat of the handle of said hammer to permit
passage of said throat in a lateral direction through the space
between said lugs when said hammer head is elevated, at least one
leg having an external side edge which is diagonally disposed in
the outwardly tapering direction so that contact between the hammer
claw and said diagonal edge will occur at the inner edge of the
claw and cause said hammer to rock in a direction such that said
handle swings toward the leg of the user.
2. A hammer holder as claimed in claim 1 in which the edges of said
shank receiving opening are rectangular.
3. A hammer holder as claimed in claim 1 in which said vertical
portion has openings to receive a supporting belt.
4. A hammer holder as claimed in claim 3 in which said openings are
circular, and grommets disposed in said opening.
5. A belt supported hammer holder for a claw hammer comprising an
L-shaped bracket having a vertical portion and a horizontal
portion, the horizontal portion being bifurcated and providing two
fixed, nonresilient legs, lugs at the outer end of each leg
extending toward each other, said lugs cooperating with said legs
to define a U-shaped opening having an entrance restriction, the
width of said legs being such that the external side edge of one
leg provides a support for the claw of the hammer, said external
side edge being diagonally disposed in the outwardly tapering
direction for supporting said claw only at the inner corner edge
thereof.
6. A hammer holder as claimed in claim 5 in which the edges of said
U-shaped opening are rectangular.
7. A hammer holder as claimed in claim 6 in which said vertical
portion has openings to receive a supporting belt.
8. A hammer holder as claimed in claim 7 in which said belt
receiving openings are circular, and grommets disposed in said
opening.
9. In combination, a hammer and a belt supported holder therefor,
said hammer comprising a head and a handle, said head including a
shank and a claw, and said handle including a throat portion of
smaller dimensions than said shank, said holder comprising an
L-shaped bracket having a vertical portion and a horizontal
portion, the horizontal portion being bifurcated and providing two
legs, lugs at the outer end of each leg extending toward each
other, said lugs cooperating with said legs to define an opening
adapted to receive said shank, the distance between said lugs being
less than the corresponding dimension of said shank and greater
than the smaller dimension of said throat portion to permit passage
of said throat portion in a lateral direction through the space
between said lugs when said hammer head is elevated, at least one
leg having an external side edge which is diagonally disposed in
the outwardly tapering direction, said claw extending laterally
beyond said diagonal side edge and downwardly with the inner corner
edge of said claw engaging said diagonal edge, the outer corner
edge of said claw being spaced above said diagonal edge when said
handle is vertically disposed so that said hammer will rock in a
direction such that said handle swings toward the leg of the user.
Description
This invention relates to a hammer holder to be suspended from the
belt of a carpenter's apron or the like.
In previously proposed belt-suspended hammer holders, the hammer
rests either in a ring, or in some resilient clip device. The
disadvantage of the ring type is that the hammer must be lifted the
full length of the handle in order to remove same. In the resilient
clip type, considerable force is required to disengage the hammer
handle from the clip.
According to my invention, I provide a hammer holder in which the
hammer may be removed merely by lifting it a few inches and then
twisting it 90.degree. , after which it can be freely removed
horizontally.
A further disadvantage of the prior art hammer holders is that the
handle extended down vertically so that the lower end is spaced
from the leg or thigh of the carpenter. This arrangement causes the
hammer handle to catch on ladders, scaffolds, 2 .times. 4 uprights
and the like.
According to my invention, I provide a hammer holder in which the
hammer handle hugs the leg of the user, but the arrangement is such
that force with which the hammer handle engages the leg is not so
heavy that it interferes with the free leg movement of the
user.
Other objects, features and advantages will become apparent as the
description proceeds.
In the drawings:
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a preferred embodiment of my
invention, with the hammer and the carpenter's apron shown in
phantom;
FIG. 2 is an elevation of the holder of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a plan view of FIG. 2;
FIG. 4 is an end view taken along the line 4-4 of FIG. 3 showing a
portion of the hammer head in section to illustrate the operation;
and
FIG. 5 is a horizontal section taken along line 5-5 of FIG. 4
showing the shape of the hammer handle.
With reference now to FIG. 1, the hammer holder comprises an
L-shaped bracket 10 which is supported by the belt or string 11 of
a carpenter's apron 12. The L-shaped bracket comprises a vertical
portion 13 and a horizontal portion 15. The vertical portion has
circular holes therein lined by suitable grommets 14 or the like,
to provide a smooth rounded edge through which the apron string 11
can extend, and be protected from any sharp edges which tend to cut
the string. The horizontal portion 15 is bifurcated to provide two
legs 9, each having at its outer end a lug 17 which extends toward
the opposite lug 17. The legs 9 and lugs 17 define a U-shaped
opening 16 of generally rectangular shape having an entrance
constriction.
The external side edges 18 of the legs 9 are diagonally disposed;
that is, they are each outwardly tapering with respect to the
vertical medial plane of the bracket 10.
The bracket 10 is adapted to hold a hammer 19 having a head 20 and
a handle 22. The hammer head 20 is provided with a shank 21 of
generally rectangular cross section. The dimensions of the
rectangular U-shaped opening 16 are such that the head shank 21 is
received loosely within the opening 16.
The hammer handle 22 as shown in FIG. 4 has a somewhat narrower
throat portion 23 which, in the example shown in FIG. 5, may be of
an oval cross section having a long dimension X and a shorter
dimension Y. The distance between the lugs 17 is greater than the
shorter dimension Y so that when the hammer head is lifted a few
inches and twisted through 90.degree., the throat portion 23 can
pass laterally through the space between the lugs 17. Of course,
the cross section of the hammer handle 22 may be rectangular or of
an irregular shape, as long as at least one dimension is smaller
than the distance between the lugs 17.
Although the distance between the lugs 17 could be sufficiently
great as to permit the hammer handle to be moved laterally
therethrough without rotating the same through 90.degree., the
preferred arrangement is as shown in which the distance between the
lugs 17 is somewhat less than the dimension X and greater than the
dimension Y.
Thus the hammer is loosely received within the opening 16 from
which it may readily be moved by first a lifting motion and then a
lateral motion, the arrangement being such that the weight of the
hammer maintains it in the FIG. 1 position in which the lugs 17
interfere with the head shank 21 to prevent an inadvertent removal
of the same.
In order to prevent the hammer handle from catching on a ladder or
the like, the arrangement is such that the hammer handle tends to
swing against the leg of the user. This is accomplished by the
diagonal orientation of the side edges 18. If the hammer handle is
oriented vertically as shown in FIG. 4, then contact between the
claw portion 25 and the horizontal portion 15 will occur only at
the inner corner edge 26 of the claw, as shown in FIG. 4. Therefore
the weight of the hammer tends to cause it to swing in the
direction of the arrow 27 until such time as the outer corner edge
28 contacts the side edge 18 of the horizontal portion 15. In most
instances, the leg of the user prevents rotation of the hammer to
this extent with the result that the handle rocks into contact with
the user's leg and hugs the same. The force with which the hammer
handle engages the leg is not so heavy that it interferes with the
free leg movement of the user with the result that the hammer
handle rocks back and forth with the body movements of the user but
never hangs clear of the leg where it would catch on ladders,
scaffolds, uprights, and the like.
The vertical portion 13 may also have vertically oriented elongate
holes 29 so that the holder 10 may be supported from the trouser
belt of the user, instead of an apron belt 11.
* * * * *