U.S. patent number 3,599,153 [Application Number 04/827,403] was granted by the patent office on 1971-08-10 for magnetic authentication of security documents having varying ink level coding.
This patent grant is currently assigned to United States Banknote Corporation. Invention is credited to Jerry Lewis, Raymond J. Zablocki.
United States Patent |
3,599,153 |
Lewis , et al. |
August 10, 1971 |
**Please see images for:
( Certificate of Correction ) ** |
MAGNETIC AUTHENTICATION OF SECURITY DOCUMENTS HAVING VARYING INK
LEVEL CODING
Abstract
A document authentication technique is provided wherein at some
predetermined region on the surface of said document there is
printed a portion of an image in magnetic ink. The magnetic ink is
deposited with predetermined variation of layer thicknesses, as is
accomplished using the intaglio process. For readout, the magnetic
ink is saturated by a constant magnetic field, and then passed
under a magnetic reading head, which produces as its output, a
signal having a unique multilevel waveform which is readily
associated with the multilevels of magnetic ink which are deposited
on the document. This unique waveform can be identified by
comparison with a standard.
Inventors: |
Lewis; Jerry (Mahwah, NJ),
Zablocki; Raymond J. (Garden City, NY) |
Assignee: |
United States Banknote
Corporation (New York, NY)
|
Family
ID: |
25249129 |
Appl.
No.: |
04/827,403 |
Filed: |
May 23, 1969 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
235/449; 235/493;
101/150; 283/82; 101/369; 101/170 |
Current CPC
Class: |
G07F
7/086 (20130101); G07D 7/20 (20130101); G07D
7/04 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
G07F
7/08 (20060101); G07D 7/04 (20060101); G07D
7/20 (20060101); G07D 7/00 (20060101); H04q
003/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;340/149A
;235/61.12M,61.7B |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Pitts; Harold I.
Claims
What I claim is;
1. A document encoding for authentication technique comprising
depositing on the surface of said document a layer of magnetic ink,
the volume of said layer varying above the surface of said document
in a predetermined manner for producing predetermined magnetic
fields.
2. A technique as recited in claim 1 wherein said magnetic ink is
deposited as part of a pattern on said document surface.
3. A method of document encoding for authentication comprising
printing on the surface of said document with magnetic ink whose
volume above the surface of said document varies in a predetermined
manner, saturating with magnetic flux said magnetic ink on said
document, moving said document under a magnetic reading head to
pass said magnetic ink thereunder, and checking the output signals
from said magnetic sensing head against a standard for determining
document authenticity.
4. An authenticated document comprising a document having printing
over the surface thereof, a predetermined portion of said printing
constituting magnetic ink extending above the surface of said
document in a predetermined sequence of different ink volumes for
providing an authenticating encoding.
5.
Apparatus for determining the authenticity of a document having an
authenticating encoding in the form of a predetermined portion
thereof printed with magnetic ink extending above the surface of
said document with predetermined different thicknesses
comprising:
means for saturating with magnetic flux, said predetermined portion
of said document,
means for moving said predetermined portion of said document under
a reading head for producing a characteristic waveform at the
output thereof representative of the predetermined different
thicknesses of said magnetic ink on said document,
means for generating waveforms representative of an acceptable
standard, and means for comparing the waveforms produced by said
reading head with said generated waveforms to produce an output
indicative of the merits of said waveform comparison.
6. Apparatus as recited in claim 5 wherein there is included means
for normalizing the signal output of said reading head, means for
sampling said normalized output, means for producing digital
numbers representative of each of said samples, memory means for
producing a sequence of acceptable digital numbers, and means for
comparing the sequence of numbers from said memory means with the
output of said means for converting the samples to digital numbers
for indicating acceptance or nonacceptance of said document.
7. An authenticated document comprising a document having printing
over the surface thereof, a predetermined portion of said printing
constituting magnetic ink extending above the surface of said
document in a predetermined sequence of different ink thicknesses
above the surface of said document to provide an authenticating
encoding.
8. Apparatus for determining the authenticity of a document having
successive predetermined regions thereof printed with magnetic ink
extending above the surface of said document with predetermined ink
thicknesses comprising:
means for saturating said successive predetermined regions of said
document with magnetic flux,
means for moving said successive predetermined regions of said
document under a magnetic reading head for successively producing
from each region characteristic waveforms representative of the
predetermined different thicknesses of said magnetic ink,
means for separately storing the waveforms produced by said
magnetic reading head from a first and a second of said successive
predetermined regions, and
means for comparing said stored waveforms to produce an output
indicative of the results of said comparison.
9. Apparatus as recited in claim 7 wherein there is included means
for converting the waveforms produced by said magnetic reading head
into a representative sequence of digital numbers, and
said means for separately storing separately stores the digital
numbers representative of the waveforms produced from each
successive predetermined region.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to document authentication techniques and
more particularly to an improved magnetic method for performing
said authentication. Means are provided to illustrate the
technique.
The problem of insuring that documents, such as stocks, credit
cards, travelers checks, bonds, or money are authentic, is an ever
present one in view of the fact that the skills of a counterfeiter
improve with advancing technology.
OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THIS INVENTION
This invention provides a new method and means for incorporating
information into the material printed on a document whereby said
document may be authenticated as a reproduction of the intaglio
process.
Another feature of this invention is to provide a unique magnetic
method and means of determining whether or not a document is
authentic whereby the printed information is read and compared to a
predetermined, multilevel and unique signature of the document.
Still another feature of the present invention is the provision of
an arrangement whereby the above described information is encoded
in the document in a manner which renders simulation substantially
impossible.
The foregoing features are accomplished in an arrangement wherein a
document is printed employing the intaglio process. At
predetermined locations on the document, from the making of the
intaglio plate, the depth of cut is specifically controlled so that
magnetic ink, which is used in the process of printing, is laid
down on the document at a predetermined depth representative of a
predetermined volume of ink, with the depth and/or volume
variations following a desired predetermined pattern. Thereafter,
even though a subsequent impression calenders the intaglio printing
so as to reduce its height above the substrate document, the volume
of ink in said location, although reduced in height, contains a
volume component of the original plate depth so as to maintain the
original magnetic level or magnetic field density. Thereafter, for
the process of recognition or authentication, the document is moved
past a first location at which the magnetic ink regions thereof are
saturated with magnetic flux. The document thereafter moves past a
second location at which there is positioned a magnetic sensing
head. The sensing head, in response to the varying magnetic ink
depths which are magnetically saturated, generates a signal having
a wave form uniquely representative of the original magnetic ink
depths. This wave form itself may be normalized and then compared
with a previously stored pattern. This wave form may be digitized
and likewise compared with previously stored data. Alternatively,
the printing with magnetic ink on the document can be made with
repetitive patterns over a region thereof. These repetitive
patterns can then be read and compared, and if they indicate that
they are alike, the document can be then accepted as authentic.
The novel features of the invention are set forth with
particularity in the appended claims. The invention will best be
understood from the following description when read in conjunction
with the accompanying drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of a magnetic ink deposition
on a surface in accordance with this invention.
FIGS. 2A, 2B, and 2C indicate the appearance of various magnetic
ink depositions on a document.
FIG. 3 is a schematic representation of the manner in which a
document may be scanned for authentication.
FIG. 4 is a block schematic diagram of a circuit for authenticating
a document in which in accordance with this invention encoding has
occurred as a series of successive blocks of varying quantum levels
of ink volume and therefore magnetic level.
FIG. 5 is a block schematic diagram of a circuit for authenticating
a document in which, in accordance with this invention, encoding
has occurred in the repeating rosette pattern on a document.
FIG. 6 is a block schematic diagram in accordance with this
invention for authenticating a document in which encoding has
occurred on the vignette on the document.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Documents such as stocks or bonds are normally printed using the
intaglio process. In this process, the printing plate has a relief
image etched over the surface thereover with varying depths of etch
in accordance with various shades of the image. The greater the
depth, the more ink that is applied and transferred to the paper,
and the darker the appearance of the image at that particular
location.
In accordance with this invention, over a predetermined region of
the document, or, if more than one is desired, over predetermined
regions, the depth of etch will be predetermined. The intaglio
plate is inked by magnetic ink which is then transferred to the
document whose authentication is sought to be determined at a
future time. Of course the ink layers in the predetermined region
or regions will have a predetermined depth sequence or arrangement.
Thus, if one first passes that region of the document under a
magnetic head which saturates the region with magnetic flux, and
thereafter passes that region of the document under a magnetic
sensing head, the output of the magnetic sensing head will
constitute an electrical signal having a predetermined wave shape,
which can be identified for the purpose of identifying the
document.
As far as counterfeiters are concerned, since all of the ink used
is magnetic, they will not know what predetermined regions of a
document are being used for authenticating purposes. Assuming that
it might be possible for them to find this out, then unless they
can exactly duplicate the depth of etch sequence together with the
distance those depths extend into the plane of the plate, they
still cannot duplicate the document. This latter achievement is
almost impossible to do.
If a counterfeiter attempts to simulate a document by the use of
lithography, then in order to build up successive layers of ink in
order to properly simulate the signal of the intaglio document, the
forger must achieve almost perfect superimposition of successive
lithographic prints. This too, is almost impossible to do.
Referring now to FIG. 1, there may be seen in cross section the
appearance of the magnetic ink 10 which has been deposited upon the
surface of the document 12. This magnetic ink has a varying height
above the surface of the document, which is predetermined by the
depth of etch in the intaglio plate. The height represents a fixed
volume of ink to be placed under the sensing head area. The
magnetic field is thus fixed and even with compression of the
volume, maintains a fixed magnetic level.
Now the encoding on a document may be done in any number of ways.
As shown in FIG. 2A, the ink may be deposited in the form of a
succession of blocks 14, the height of each of which above the
surface of the paper 12, differs from the others, in accordance
with a predetermined plan. The blocks may be hidden by being
dispersed in the lettering on a document, or within the image or
figure on the document. The first block of a group of blocks may be
given a fixed level which can act as a reference level for
adjusting the signals derived from the blocks that follow.
FIG. 2B represents a portion of the rosette which normally borders
a fiscal certificate. A reading, for authentication, may be taken
through the rosette at the region indicated by the arrow in FIG. 2B
and authentication may be established by the requirement that the
signals derived from any single rosette pattern are exactly
duplicated by the signals derived from the other rosette patterns
which are scanned at the same region. This procedure is a test of
the quality of printing which is a determinant of counterfeit
detection.
FIGS. 2C represents one portion of a figure or vignette which is
normally shown on a fiscal certificate. Scanning may be made
through the portion of the vignette indicated by the arrow in FIG.
2C, to determine whether the signals derived as a result of a
magnetic reading taking through this region, are in accordance with
those established as a standard for authentication of the
document.
FIG. 3 indicates an arrangement which may be employed for reading a
document for the purposes of its authentication. The document 12
may be placed on a conveyor belt 20, using any of the well-known
forms of alignment, either mechanical, such as mechanical etch
guides, or electrical, such as photocells placed so that the belt
will not move until the light reaching the photocell indicates that
the document is in proper alignment on the belts. A photocell 22 is
placed above the belt to indicate when the document 12 reaches the
region of a plurality of magnetic saturation heads respectively 24,
26, 28 and 30, which extend across the document for the purpose of
biasing the magnetic ink thereon to magnetic saturation. The
document then passes under a plurality of magnetic sensing heads
respectively 32, 34, 36, 38, which respond to the magnetic fields
produced by the magnetic ink. One of the heads 24 may be placed
near the border of the document to respond to the magnetic flux
pattern of the rosette. The second head 24 may be placed in the
region of the image or vignette on the document in order to respond
to the magnetic field present there. A third magnetic reading head
36 is placed over the region of the document which contains numbers
or characters, to respond to the magnetic fields present there. A
fourth reading head 38 (or even more), may be positioned at various
locations over the document for the purpose of detecting guidance
marks, reference marks, or a signal pattern for the purpose of
indicating to the circuitry connected to the other reading heads
when the time to commence reading has occurred. In brief, as many
magnetic reading heads are employed as are required for the
function of authentication, reference level signal detecting, and
alignment control. These heads are made wide enough to insure that
the volume of ink to be sensed will pass under all of the head.
FIG. 4 is a block schematic diagram of an arrangement which may be
used for detecting the information contained in magnetic ink
blocks, such as represented in FIG. 2A. The magnetic sensing head
which reads the magnetic ink blocks, here represented as a reading
head signal source 40, applies the signals derived from the
magnetic ink blocks to an amplifier 42, and to a reference level
setter 44. The first block of any group is always used for the
purpose of setting a reference level signal, and this is achieved
by always employing a fixed depth of etch for the region on the
intaglio plate which will print the first block. The first block
signal is detected by the reference level detector 44, which
establishes the threshold of a level detector circuit 46.
The of the amplifier 42 besides being applied to the gated level
detector circuit 46 is also applied to a differentiating circuit
48. The output of the differentiating circuit 48 is applied to a
pulse generator 50, in order to synchronize its output with the
beginning of each block signal which is read. The pulse generator
50 applies its output to the gated level detector in order to chop
the signal into discrete signal areas. These discrete signal areas
of varying signal levels are applied by the gated level detector to
an analog-to-digital converter 52.
A clock generator 54, clocks the analog-to-digital converter which
converts the level of each signal to a digital number. This digital
number is then entered into a holding register 55, which stores all
of the digital numbers for a group of blocks. These digital numbers
may be displayed by a display device 56, which is connected to the
holding register.
From an external keyboard 59 or from other electronic sensing of
the document by methods well known in the art, an identification
code is applied to the gates 60, representative of an address. The
gates 60 address a memory 62 with their outputs. The memory address
causes a readout of a sequence of digital numbers from memory which
should correspond with the sequence of digital numbers entered into
the register 55. The readout from the memory 62, as well as that of
the register 55 are applied to a comparator 64. Should there not be
correspondence between the output of the memory 62 and that of the
register 55, then a pass-fail indicator 66, is energized to
indicate this fact. The pass-fail indicator may be any device which
is actuated by an electric signal which the comparator provides as
an output when its two inputs do not compare favorably.
When the counter 58 has finished its count, its last count is
applied to a reset pulse generator 68. This generates a reset pulse
which can reset the gates 60, and the register 55, and the
reference level set 44, so that the circuit may be reset for a new
reading.
FIG. 5 is a block schematic diagram of an arrangement effecting
authentication of a document by reading the magnetic fields of its
rosette pattern. It will be remembered that, as shown in FIG. 2B,
the rosette pattern consists of a series of repeated patterns.
Authentication may be achieved by insuring that, for example, all
or a predetermined number of these rosette patterns provide an
identical output signal train. Accordingly, this requires a
knowledge of the length of the rosette pattern being read since the
pattern length can vary from document to document. The length
information may be recorded on the document being authenticated
adjacent to the reading location either by block signals, as above,
or by register marks providing the physical length of the pattern.
These will be designated as the start and stop signals, and are
read by a magnetic sensing head assigned thereto.
In FIG. 5, the information signals from the saturated magnetic
elements of the rosette are generated by a sensing head signal
source 70, and the information signals as to the starting and
stopping of the rosette pattern are generated by a "start-stop
reading head signal source," 72. The outputs from both of these
heads are applied to respective amplifiers 74, 76. The output of
the amplifier 76 is applied to a start-stop flip-flop. The start
output pulse from the flip-flop causes a count to be entered into a
counter 80. One count is entered for each rosette pattern which is
to be read. The end of each rosette is detected and applied to the
start-stop flip-flop 78 causing it to be reset. The start of each
rosette therefore enables the start-stop flip-flop to provide
another output pulse to the counter 80.
A chopper 82, chops, or samples the signals received from the
amplifier 74, and applies them to a digitizer 86, as well as
applying synchronizing pulses to a clock generator 88. The
digitizer 86 is enabled to function only in response to the start
signal produced at the output of the start-stop flip-flop 78.
The chopper 82 samples the input signals at a predetermined rate,
and the digitizer 86 converts these signals to binary digit
signals. The output of the digitizer is applied to two gates
respectively 90, 92. One or the other of these two gates is enabled
by the set or reset output of a flip-flop 94. Flip-flop 94 is
driven from its set to its reset state successively in response to
start signals from the output of the start-stop start-stop
flip-flop 78. Accordingly, the output of the digitizer 86, which is
applied to these two gates 90, 92, during the reading from one
rosette pattern is transferred by gate 90 into a register 96. At
the reading of the next rosette pattern, the output of the
digitizer, consisting of a train of binary signals, is applied to a
register 98 by the gate 92.
The clock generator 88 shifts the registers 96, 98 to enable them
to enter the digits received from the digitizer 86. At the
commencement of a reading of a rosette pattern, register 96 is
filled. At the second rosette pattern reading, register 98 is
filled. The comparator 100 then can operate to compare the outputs
of the two registers 96, 98 for identicality. It provides an output
pulse when its inputs are not identical. The output of the
comparator 100 is entered into an error counter 102. The error
counter counts the number of errors detected by the comparator 100.
When they exceed a predetermined value, it can energize a pass-fail
indicator 104, to indicate that the rosette patterns do not pass
the authentication test.
The counter 80 counts the number of signals received from the
flip-flop 78, and when they attain a predetermined count value
indicative of the predetermined number of rosette patterns to be
compared, the counter overflow output 80 resets the flip-flop 94,
the error counter 102, and the registers 96, 98.
An alternative method of authenticating a document by using the
rosette pattern can be accomplished with the detection of a
variation of etch depth superimposed on the border comprising the
rosettes. The protection provided by this method lies in the
identical visual appearance of the repeated rosettes, but a
magnetic level difference between patterns. Specifically, a
photographic reproduction or visual examination would not indicate
a rosette-to-rosette variation, but the use of intaglio printing
and magnetic sensing would disclose a predetermined variation. This
variation, extracted from the pattern, could in itself be encoded
and compared with data obtained from a memory addressed by that
particular document class, or compared to data extracted by other
means from the document.
FIG. 6 is a block schematic diagram illustrating an arrangement for
effecting authentication by sensing the magnetic field pattern
derived from a vignette, such as illustrated in FIG. 2C. SIgnals
from a sensing head signal source 110 are applied to an amplifier
112, whose output is applied to a start-stop signal detector 111
and to a level detector 114. The start-stop signal detector detects
a start signal pattern or amplitude at the beginning of a vignette
and a stop signal pattern at the end of a vignette. A pulse output
at the start energizes the clock circuit 116. A pulse signifying
stop deenergizes the clock circuit. The level detector 114 samples
the signals received from the amplifier at a rate which is
established by a clock circuit 116. The clock circuit 116 is also
used to advance a counter 118, and after a delay by delay circuit
117, it advances an address counter 119. The level detector 114
output is applied to a tapped delay line 120. A summing circuit 122
sums the output of all of the taps. When the counter 118 reaches
its full count, which is established by the time required for the
first of a sequence of signals from the level detector to reach the
last tap of the delay line and the last of the sample signals to be
at the first tap of the delay line, the output of the counter 118
at that time energizes a sample and hold circuit 123, which
operates to hold the sum of all of the signals which are applied to
the delay line taps, at that time.
The output of the tapped delay line, which is a sequence of the
signal samples from the level detector, thereafter reaches a
divider circuit 124 which divides each of the signals by the sum
signal held in the sample and hold circuit 123. All of these
samples are normalized by the technique described, namely dividing
the sum of all samples into each sample, and therefore random
variations in the document to head distance and deterioration of
the ink height is compensated for.
An amplifier 126 receives the outputs from the divider 124. The
gain of the amplifier 126 is controlled by reference level signals
on the document. These are ready by a reference level reading head
128, whose output is detected by a reference mark detector 130. The
reference mark level detector output controls the gain of the
amplifier 126 in response to the gain of the reference signal which
it has received.
The output of the amplifier 126 is applied to an analog-to-digital
converter 132, which converts each level to a digital number. Each
one of these digital number signals is entered into a register 134,
and is also displayed by a display device 136.
Initially, the address counter 119 has a start address for the
memory entered thereinto from an address signal source 138. This
may be a keyboard or read from the document by another reading
head. This start address also identifies the document.
It will be recalled that the address counter 119 had the output of
the clock circuit 116 applied thereto. This output is applied
through the delay circuit 117, whose function it is to delay the
count sequence of the counter 119 until digital signals can be
entered in the register 132. The output of the address counter 119,
which is a sequence of counts, constitutes address information for
a memory 140. This memory accordingly can read out a sequence of
digital numbers into a comparator 134, which sequence should
correspond with the sequence of numbers applied to the comparator
by the register 130. In the event these numbers do not agree, then
the output of the comparator can energize a pass or fail indicator
136.
As previously indicated, authentication of a document may be
achieved by any one or any combination of the three methods shown
above.
Accordingly, there has been shown and described herein a novel, and
useful arrangement of encoding for authentication of a document,
which is extremely difficult, if not impossible to be duplicated by
unauthorized persons.
* * * * *