U.S. patent number 3,586,758 [Application Number 04/873,973] was granted by the patent office on 1971-06-22 for insulated cantilever standoff conductor support.
This patent grant is currently assigned to A. B. Chance Company. Invention is credited to Robert W. Harmon, Paul E. Lewis.
United States Patent |
3,586,758 |
Harmon , et al. |
June 22, 1971 |
INSULATED CANTILEVER STANDOFF CONDUCTOR SUPPORT
Abstract
A cantilever standoff for supporting a conductor in laterally
spaced relationship to a line pole. A base member is attached to
the pole and a standoff arm extends outwardly therefrom, its
outboard end being provided with a suitable conductor support. The
arm has a tapered, insulating body of synthetic resin material of
progressively greater cross-sectional area toward the base member,
and one or more longitudinally extending, load-bearing rods of
uniform individual cross section are disposed within the body to
increase its tensile strength and, in some forms of the
construction, its compressive strength as well. The rods are
composed of a synthetic resin that is longitudinally reinforced by
glass fibers, the ends of the rods being rigidly anchored in the
base member and the outboard conductor support. The body is
provided with a series of integral skirts over its length to
increase resistance to flashover. The base member may be specially
configured to transmit shear stresses thereto.
Inventors: |
Harmon; Robert W. (Centralia,
MO), Lewis; Paul E. (Mexico, MO) |
Assignee: |
A. B. Chance Company
(Centralia, MO)
|
Family
ID: |
25362718 |
Appl.
No.: |
04/873,973 |
Filed: |
November 4, 1969 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
174/158R;
174/179; 174/169; 174/209 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H01B
17/16 (20130101); H01B 17/14 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H01B
17/14 (20060101); H01B 17/16 (20060101); H01b
017/14 (); H01b 017/60 () |
Field of
Search: |
;174/45,148,149,150,158,163,168,169,171,174,176,177,178,179,181,186,194,195,209 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239,985 |
|
Aug 1962 |
|
AU |
|
1,361,719 |
|
Apr 1964 |
|
FR |
|
466,396 |
|
Jan 1969 |
|
CH |
|
Primary Examiner: Askin; Laramie E.
Claims
Having thus described the invention, what we claim as new and
desire to be secured by Letters Patent is:
1. A cantilever conductor standoff structure comprising:
a base member adapted for attachment to an upright support;
an elongated standoff arm extending from said member and presenting
a free, outboard end remote from said member,
said arm having a tapered, insulating body of progressively greater
transverse cross-sectional area as said member is approached, and a
plurality of spaced apart, tensile load-bearing rods in said body
extending longitudinally thereof from said member to said outboard
end;
a conductor support carried by said outboard end; and
means rigidly connecting opposed extremities of said rods to said
member and said member and said conductor support,
at least a major portion of each of said rods being disposed above
the longitudinal centerline of said body in a longitudinally
extending region thereof subject to the greatest tensile load,
said body having a generally triangular transverse cross-sectional
configuration with one apex thereof presenting the bottom of said
body and the side between the other two, lateral apexes presenting
the top thereof,
said rods being spaced transversely of said body adjacent said
top.
2. The structure as claimed in claim 1, said body being composed of
a rigid thermosetting synthetic resin.
3. The structure as claimed in claim 2, said rods being composed of
a glass fiber reinforced, rigid thermosetting synthetic resin.
4. The structure as claimed in claim 3, said resin being epoxy.
5. The structure as claimed in claim 2, said body having a glass
fiber reinforced core within which said rods are disposed, and an
outer, homogenous jacket resistant to weathering and tracking.
6. The structure as claimed in claim 5, the fibers in said core
being random disposed, said rods being composed of a glass fiber
reinforced, rigid thermosetting synthetic resin having longitudinal
fiber orientation.
7. The structure as claimed in claim 2, said body being provided
with a series of integral, outwardly projecting skirts spaced
longitudinally thereof.
8. The structure as claimed in claim 1,
there being a compressive load-bearing rod element in said body
adjacent said bottom apex and extending longitudinally of the body
from said base member to said outboard end; and
means rigidly connecting opposed extremities of said element to
said member and said conductor support.
9. A cantilever conductor standoff structure comprising:
a base member adapted for attachment to an upright support;
an elongated standoff arm extending from said member and presenting
a free, outboard end remote from said member,
said arm having a tapered, insulating body of progressively greater
transverse cross-sectional area as said member is approached, and a
tensile load-bearing rod in said body extending longitudinally
thereof from said member to said outboard end;
a conductor support carried by said outboard end; and
means rigidly connecting opposed extremities of said rod to said
member and said conductor support,
said base member having a portion projecting longitudinally into
said body in engagement with the latter and configured for
transmittal of shear stresses to said member,
said projecting portion of the base member being stepped to present
a plurality of ledges against which the shear forces bear.
10. A cantilever conductor standoff structure comprising:
a base member adapted for attachment to an upright support;
an elongated standoff arm extending from said member and presenting
a free, outboard end remote from said member,
said arm having a tapered, insulating body of progressively greater
transverse cross-sectional area as said member is approached, and a
tensile load-bearing rod in said body extending longitudinally
thereof from said member to said outboard end;
a conductor support carried by said outboard end; and
means rigidly connecting oppose extremities of said rod to said
member and said conductor support,
said base member and said conductor support having anchoring wells
therein receiving said extremities of the rod,
said connecting means including said wells and a cement therein
bonding said extremities to said member and said conductor
support,
each of said extremities having a dovetail configuration within the
corresponding well.
11. A cantilever conductor standoff structure comprising:
a base member adapted for attachment to an upright support;
an elongated standoff arm extending from said member and presenting
a free, outboard end remote from said member,
said arm having a tapered, insulating body of progressively greater
transverse cross-sectional area as said member is approached, and a
tensile load-bearing rod in said body extending longitudinally
thereof from said member to said outboard end;
a conductor support carried by said outboard end;
means rigidly connecting opposed extremities of said rod to said
member and said conductor support,
at least a major portion of said rod being disposed above the
longitudinal centerline of said body in a longitudinally extending
region thereof subject to the greatest tensile load;
a compressive load-bearing rod element in said body extending
longitudinally thereof from said base member to said outboard end;
and
means rigidly connecting opposed extremities of said element to
said member and said conductor support,
at least a major portion of said element being disposed below the
longitudinal centerline of said body.
12. The structure as claimed in claim 11,
there being a plurality of said tensile load-bearing rods in said
body spaced apart in said region and having a greater total
transverse cross-sectional area than said element,
the first-mentioned connecting means joining opposed extremities of
said plurality of rods to said base member and said conductor
support.
13. The structure as claimed in claim 12,
said body having a generally triangular transverse cross-sectional
configuration with one apex thereof presenting the bottom of said
body and the side between the other two, lateral apexes presenting
the top thereof,
said tensile load-bearing rods being three in number spaced
transversely of said body adjacent said top with the middle rod
centrally disposed with respect to said lateral apexes,
said element being disposed adjacent said bottom apex.
14. The structure as claimed in claim 11, said tensile load-bearing
rod having a greater transverse cross-sectional area than said
element.
15. The structure as claimed in claim 14, said body having a
vertically elongated transverse cross-sectional configuration and a
greater horizontal width adjacent said tensile load-bearing
rod.
16. The structure as claimed in claim 11, said body having a
vertically elongated transverse cross-sectional configuration.
17. A cantilever conductor standoff structure comprising:
a base member adapted for attachment to an upright support;
an elongated standoff arm extending from said member and presenting
a free, outboard end remote from said member,
said arm having a tapered, insulating body of progressively greater
transverse cross-sectional area as said member is approached, and a
tensile load-bearing rod in said body extending longitudinally
thereof from said member to said outboard end;
a conductor support carried by said outboard end; and
means rigidly connecting opposed extremities of said rod to said
member and said conductor support,
at least a major portion of said rod being disposed above the
longitudinal centerline of said body in a longitudinally extending
region thereof subject to the greatest tensile load,
said rod having an asymmetric transverse cross-sectional
configuration to concentrate its mass at the greatest vertical
distance from said centerline.
18. A cantilever conductor standoff structure comprising:
a base member adapted for attachment to an upright support;
an elongated standoff arm extending from said member and presenting
a free, outboard end remote from said member,
said arm having a tapered, insulating body of progressively greater
transverse cross-sectional area as said member is approached, and a
tensile load-bearing rod in said body extending longitudinally
thereof from said member to said outboard end;
a conductor support carried by said outboard end; and
means rigidly connecting opposed extremities of said rod to said
member and said conductor support,
at least a major portion of said rod being disposed above the
longitudinal centerline of said body in a longitudinally extending
region thereof subject to the greatest tensile load,
said body having a circular transverse cross-sectional
configuration of progressively greater diameter as said base member
is approached.
19. The structure as claimed in claim 18, said rod having an
asymmetric transverse cross-sectional configuration to concentrate
its mass at the greatest vertical distance from said
centerline.
20. A cantilever conductor standoff structure comprising:
a base member adapted for attachment to an upright support;
an elongated standoff arm extending from said member and presenting
a free, outboard end remote from said member,
said arm having a tapered, insulating body of progressively greater
transverse cross-sectional area as said member is approached, and a
tensile load-bearing rod in said body extending longitudinally
thereof from said member to said outboard end;
a conductor support carried by said outboard end; and
means rigidly connecting opposed extremities of said rod to said
member and said conductor support,
at least a major portion of said rod being disposed above the
longitudinal centerline of said body in a longitudinally extending
region thereof subject to the greatest tensile load,
said body and said rod having vertically elongated transverse
cross-sectional configurations.
21. A cantilever conductor standoff structure comprising:
a base member adapted for attachment to an upright support;
an elongated standoff arm extending from said member and presenting
a free, outboard end remote from said member,
said arm having a tapered, insulating body of progressively greater
transverse cross-sectional area as said member is approached, and a
tensile load-bearing rod in said body extending longitudinally
thereof from said member to said outboard end;
a conductor support carried by said outboard end; and
means rigidly connecting opposed extremities of said rod to said
member and said conductor support,
at least a major portion of said rod being disposed above the
longitudinal centerline of said body in a longitudinally extending
region thereof subject to the greatest tensile load,
said rod having a stepped configuration presenting a plurality of
longitudinal sections of successively reduced transverse
cross-sectional area toward said outboard end.
22. The structure as claimed in claim 21, said body and said rod
being of generally circular cross-sectional configuration and
substantially coaxially disposed.
23. The structure as claimed in claim 21, said rod including a
plurality of elongated, relatively telescoped, nested components
presenting said sections.
Description
This invention relates to improvements in cantilever standoffs
designed to impart an uncluttered appearance to overhead power
transmission lines.
Cantilever standoffs are enjoying increased use in the insulation
systems of overhead distribution and subtransmission lines as a
replacement for wooden crossarm construction, both to provide a
more aesthetically pleasing transmission installation and to
upgrade the voltage capability of existing structures. Epoxy resins
are particularly useful as the material for the standoff arms due
to the aesthetic considerations, strength, durability, and superior
electrical qualities. However, such resins are appreciably weaker
in tension than in compression, thus placing certain limitations on
the loads that may be supported. Further more, even greater
insulation and resistance to flashover are desired in present day
transmission systems, yet without an attendant increase in the cost
of the line-supporting structures.
It is, therefore, an important object of the present invention to
provide a cantilever standoff of aesthetically pleasing design
which is strong in tension as well as in compression.
Another important object of the invention is to provide a
cantilever standoff having insulating properties and resistance to
flashover superior to prior standoffs of synthetic resin
construction or wooden crossarms.
Still another important object of the invention is to provide a
standoff of superior electrical qualities as aforesaid which is
capable of supporting a current-carrying conductor closer to the
line pole than prior standoff constructions.
Yet another important object is to provide a standoff as in the
above objects which lends itself to ease of manufacture and costs
no more than prior standoffs of synthetic resin construction.
Furthermore, it is a specific aim of this invention to provide a
cantilever standoff which is durable, resistant to various
stresses, and which advantageously employs any of a number of
arrangements utilizing one or more rods within an arm body located
to increase the tensile strength thereof and, in some arrangements,
augment the compressive strength of the body.
In the drawings:
FIG. 1 is an elevational view of the first embodiment of the
standoff of the present invention, the end portions thereof being
shown in cross section and parts being broken away to reveal
details of construction;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view of the standoff of FIG. 1, certain
portions thereof being shown in cross section to reveal the
interior construction;
FIGS. 3, 4, and 5 are cross-sectional views taken along lines 3-3,
4-4, and 5-5 respectively of FIG. 1;
FIG. 6 is an elevational view of a modified form of the first
embodiment, end portions of the standoff being shown in cross
section to reveal details of construction;
FIG. 7 is a top plan view of the standoff of FIG. 6, the end
portions being shown in cross section;
FIGS. 8 and 9 are cross-sectional views taken along lines 8-8 and
9-9 respectively of FIG. 6;
FIG. 10 is an elevational view of another modified form of the
first embodiment, the end portions of the standoff being shown in
cross section to reveal interior construction;
FIGS. 11 and 12 are cross-sectional views taken along lines 11-11
and 12-12 respectively of FIG. 10;
FIG. 13 is an elevational view of another modified form of the
first embodiment, similar to FIG. 10;
FIGS. 14 and 15 are cross-sectional views taken along lines 14-14
and 15-15 respectively of FIG. 13;
FIG. 16 is an elevational view showing a further modification of
the first embodiment of the present invention, the end portions of
the standoff being revealed in cross section as in previous
figures;
FIGS. 17 and 18 are cross-sectional views taken along lines 17-17
and 18-18 respectively of FIG. 16;
FIG. 19 is an elevational view of a second embodiment of the
invention, portions thereof being illustrated in cross section and
broken away to reveal details of construction;
FIG. 20 is a top plan view of the standoff of FIG. 19 with end
portions thereof shown in cross section;
FIGS. 21 and 22 are cross-sectional views taken along lines 21-21
and 22-22 respectively of FIG. 19;
FIG. 23 is an elevational view of a modified form of the second
embodiment, end portions being illustrated in cross section as in
previous figures;
FIG. 24 is a top plan view of the standoff of FIG. 23, end portions
being shown in cross section and broken away;
FIG. 25 is a cross-sectional view taken along lines 25-25 of FIG.
23;
FIG. 26 is an elevational view of another modified form of the
second embodiment, end portions of the standoff being shown in
cross section;
FIGS. 27, 28, and 29 are cross-sectional views taken along lines
27-27, 28-28, and 29-29 respectively of FIG. 26;
FIG. 30 is an elevational view illustrating a further modification
of the second embodiment of the invention, end portions of the
standoff being shown in cross section as above;
FIGS. 31, 32, and 33 are cross-sectional views taken along lines
31-31, 32-32, and 33-33 respectively of FIG. 30;
FIG. 34 is a longitudinal cross-sectional view in a vertical plane
through a third embodiment of the invention, certain portions of
the nested rod components being shown in elevation for clarity;
and
FIGS. 35, 36, and 37 are cross-sectional views taken along lines
35-35, 36-36, and 37-37 respectively of FIG. 34.
Referring initially to FIGS. 1--5, the standoff there illustrated
has a base member 40 from which an elongated standoff arm 42
extends at approximately a 10.degree. angle to the horizontal. The
base member 40 is adapted to be attached to a line pole (not
shown), openings 44 in the base flange of the member 40 being
provided for bolts or other suitable fasteners. An integral portion
46 projects outwardly from the base member 40 and longitudinally
into the tapered insulating body 48 of the arm 42.
As FIGS. 3--5 clearly reveal, the tapered body 48 of arm 42 is of
progressively greater transverse cross-sectional area from the
free, outboard end 50 of the arm 42 to the base member 40. The
cross-sectional configuration is generally triangular and the body
48 is oriented such that the apex 52 formed by its two smaller
sides is located centrally with respect to the side apexes 54 and
56 and presents the bottom of the body 48. A series of continuous,
integral skirts 58 flare outwardly from the body 48 and are
longitudinally spaced along the length thereof to increase the
flashover resistance of the arm 42.
Three rods, 60, 62, and 64 of uniform circular cross section are
disposed within the body 48 and extend longitudinally thereof, the
opposed extremities of the rods 60--64 being anchored in the base
member 40 and a solid end fitting 66 at the outboard end 50
integral with the lower jaw of a conductor clamp 68. A conductor 70
is illustrated held between the jaws of the clamp 68, and hence in
spaced relationship to the line pole (not shown). The two rods 60
and 64 are at the sides of the body 48 adjacent the apexes 54 and
56 respectively, and the rod 62 is centrally disposed in the top
portion of the body 48 and lies in a common vertical plane with
another rod 72 adjacent the bottom apex 52. It may be appreciated
in FIGS. 3--5 that the rods 62 and 72 are respectively spaced above
and below the longitudinal centerline of the body 48.
In a cantilever standoff the greatest tensile forces are in a
longitudinal region at the top of the body 48 and, accordingly, the
greatest compressive load is in a longitudinal region at the bottom
thereof. The body 48 is composed of a rigid thermosetting synthetic
resin, preferably an epoxy resin of a type suitable for electrical
applications where resistance to weathering and tracking is an
important consideration. Epoxy resins are appreciably stronger in
compression than in tension, thus the three rods 60, 62, and 64 are
located adjacent the top of the body 48 in the longitudinal region
thereof subject to the greatest tensile load. The remaining rod 72
augments the compressive load-bearing qualities of the body 48, all
of the rods being of the same cross-sectional area. Therefore, the
total cross-sectional rod area in the tensile load region is three
times the rod area in the compressive load region as in clear from
the geometry of the arrangement.
In order to secure the extremities 74 of the rods 60--64 and 72 to
the base member 40, the latter has frustoconical anchoring wells 76
therein into which such extremities 74 project. It should be noted
that each of the extremities 74 is of a dovetail configuration
(frustoconical) and that an epoxy cement surrounds the extremity 74
within the anchoring well 76 to securely join each of the rods to
the base member 40. Similarly, the opposite extremities 78 of the
rods 60--64 and 72 likewise project into anchoring wells 80 in end
fitting 66 and are cemented in place. The rods are preferably
composed of a glass fiber reinforced epoxy synthetic resin, the
fibers in each rod being oriented to extend longitudinally
thereof.
The projecting portion 46 of the base member 40 is stepped to
present a plurality of ledges 82 in the form of radially outwardly
facing, concentric annular surfaces as best seen in FIG. 1. The
axis of the concentric surfaces is common with the longitudinal
centerline of the body 48. The ledges 82 defined by these surfaces
provide transmittal of shear stresses as will be discussed
hereinafter and also provide a good surface area for bonding of the
body 48 to the base member 40.
Referring to FIGS. 6--9, a modified form of the standoff discussed
above is shown, like or similar components being denoted by the
same reference numerals with the addition of the "a" notation. The
construction of the standoff arm 42a is the same as the standoff
arm 42 of FIGS. 1--5 except for a modification in the shape of the
tapered body 48a and the use of only two rods, 60a and 64a. It may
be clearly seen in FIGS. 8 and 9 that the top of the body 48a
presents a straight upper surface between the rounded lateral
apexes 54a and 56a, in contrast to the arcuate, convex surface
presented by the top of the body 48. Therefore, except for the
rounded apexes 52a-56a, the cross-sectional configuration of the
body 48a is essentially an equilateral triangle. In both the forms
of FIGS. 1--5 and FIGS. 6--9, the major mass of the body 48 or 48a
is above the longitudinal centerline thereof, but in the modified
form of FIGS. 6--9 the two tensile load-bearing rods 60a and 64a
replace the three rods 60--64. A rod in the compressive load region
of the body 48a is not utilized, the body material itself being
relied upon to provide the necessary compressive strength for the
standoff arm 42a.
A study of FIGS. 3--5 and FIGS. 8 and 9 reveals that in both forms
the compressive load-bearing rods are tightly clustered adjacent
the outboard end 50 or 50a of the standoff arm 42 or 42a. The
inward spacing of the rods 60 and 64 or 60a and 64a with respect to
the adjacent body apexes remains essentially constant throughout,
thus the rods are spread from the tight cluster to a widely spaced
separation at the base member 40 or 40a to provide a tapered
section modulus proportional to the length of the lever arm.
With reference to FIGS. 10--12, components identical or similar in
function to those previously described are denoted by the same
reference numerals with the addition of the "b" notation. In this
modified form the body 48b is vertically elongated as is evident
from FIG. 11. Except for rounded upper and lower surfaces, the
cross-sectional configuration of the body 48b is rectangular and
two rods 84 and 86 are disposed therein in closely spaced
relationship to the upper and lower body surfaces respectively. The
rod 84 is subject to the tensile forces in the body 48b and the rod
86 is subject to the compressive load, the two rods 84 and 86
diverging from each other as the base member 40b is approached as
is clear in the illustrations. Thus, the rods 84 and 86 spread from
a tight cluster at the outboard end 50b of the arm 42b in a manner
analogous to the forms previously described. Dovetail extremities
88 of the rods 84 and 86 are anchored in the base member 40b in the
same manner as described hereinabove, and the opposite dovetail
extremities 90 are likewise anchored in the end fitting 66b.
The body 48c of the modified form shown in FIGS. 13--15 is similar
to the body 48b of the previous form in that the body 48c is
vertically elongated as is clear in the cross-sectional views of
FIGS. 14 and 15. However, the sides of the body 48c converge toward
the bottom of the body in order to provide the greatest horizontal
width adjacent the top of the body and a minimum horizontal width
adjacent the bottom thereof. This configuration accommodates a pair
of rods 92 and 94, the upper, tensile load-bearing rod 92 being of
significantly greater diameter than the lower rod 94 that is
subjected to the compressive load. Accordingly, greater rod area is
provided in the longitudinal region of the body 48c subject to the
greatest tensile load, yet only the single rod 92 is utilized in
contrast to the multiple rod approach shown in FIGS. 1--5.
Anchoring of the opposed dovetail extremities 96 and 98 of the rods
92 and 94 in the base member 40c and the fitting 66c is
accomplished in the same manner as discussed above for the
previously described forms of the invention.
Referring to FIGS. 16--18, the body 48d of the standoff arm 42d of
this modification has the same cross-sectional configuration as the
body 48b illustrated in FIGS. 10--12. However, a single rod 100 is
utilized and is longitudinally coaxial with the body 48d. The rod
100 is of essentially rectangular cross-sectional configuration
with vertical elongation. As is best seen in the cross-sectional
view of FIG. 17, the body 48d is also vertically elongated, this
being particularly pronounced as the base member 102 of the
standoff is approached. The central location of the rod 100 within
the body 48d provides this modification of the standoff with
greater resistance to the moment resulting from the weight of the
conductor 70d. With its vertical elongation and relatively large
cross-sectional area within the body 48d, the rod 100 is also
effective as a tensile load-bearing member although it is
longitudinally centered within the body 48d.
The base member 102 of the modification of FIGS. 16--18 differs in
construction from the base members of previous forms, primarily in
that the stepped central projection is not employed due to the
provision of a large, centrally disposed frustoconical anchoring
well 104 into which the dovetail extremity 106 projects and is held
by an epoxy cement 108. The opposite extremity 109 of the rod 100
is anchored within the outboard end fitting 66d within an
appropriately sized well in the same manner as in previous forms of
the invention.
The second embodiment of the invention shown in FIGS. 19--22 has a
standoff arm 42e extending from a base member 40e as in the first
embodiment. However, the body 48e of the arm 42e is in the form of
an outer, homogeneous jacket surrounding a core 110, the latter
being preferably composed of an epoxy synthetic resin reinforced
with random disposed glass fibers. The addition of the reinforced
core 110 provides the arm 42e with increased compressive strength
and also serves to resist horizontal section shear forces.
Furthermore, the reinforced core 110 ties together the slender rods
of multiple tensile load-bearing rod configurations so that
compressive buckling is avoided. The surrounding body jacket 48e is
preferably an epoxy suitable for use in electrical applications
where superior weathering and tracking resistance is requisite, as
in the previous embodiment where no core is utilized.
The cross-sectional configuration of the standoff arm 42e is
identical to the configuration of the arm 42a of FIGS. 6--9, with
the addition of the core 110. A pair of tensile load-bearing rods
60e and 64e in the core 110 are located as discussed above with
respect to the rods in arm 42a, somewhat greater inward spacing
being utilized in arm 42e due to the presence of the outer layer
provided by the body jacket 48e. This also requires that the
stepped portion 46e of the base member 40e be centered somewhat
below the central longitudinal axis of the arm 42e to clear the
rods 60e and 64e.
Referring to FIGS. 23--25, a modified form of the second embodiment
features a standoff arm 42f having a vertically elongated body 48f
in the form of a jacket surrounding a rectangular core 112. The
degree of elongation of both the core 112 and the body jacket 48f
becomes increasingly pronounced as the base member 40f is
approached. A tensile load-bearing rod 114 is located above the
longitudinal centerline of the arm 42f and in the region of
greatest tensile load. As in the configuration of FIGS. 19--22, the
core 112 with its reinforced composition serves to strengthen the
arm 42f in compression.
Referring to FIGS. 26--29, the modification there illustrated
utilizes a standoff arm 42g having a tapered body 48g of circular
cross-sectional configuration, the body 48g being in the form of a
sleeve surrounding a tapered, cylindrical core 116. A circular rod
118 is substantially concentric with the core 116 at the outboard
end 50g of the arm 42g, but is uniformly spaced from the top of the
core 116 throughout the length of the latter as is clear in the
figures. Therefore, the rod 118 is located in the longitudinal
region of the arm 42g subject to the greatest tensile load.
Similarly, the modification of FIGS. 30--33 employs a standoff arm
42h having a body 48h in the form of a circular sleeve surrounding
a tapered, transversely circular core 120. A rod 122 is located in
the core 120 in much the same manner as described above for the rod
118 within core 116, but the rod 122 is of asymmetric transverse
cross-sectional configuration to concentrate its mass at the
greatest distance above the common longitudinal centerline of the
core 120 and surrounding body jacket 48h. To this end, it may be
seen that the rod 122 is of generally triangular configuration with
its bottom being presented by one apex, thereby providing the
desired mass concentration which becomes increasingly pronounced
toward the base member 40h, as may be appreciated by a comparison
of FIGS. 31 and 32. Note in FIG. 31 that the rod 122 is entirely
above the longitudinal centerline of the core 120, while at
approximately midway along the arm 42h the bottom apex of the rod
122 is approximately at such centerline. This same portrayal of the
apparent rise of the rod 122 within the core 120 toward the base
member 40h appears with respect to rod 118 in FIGS. 27 and 28.
A third embodiment of the invention is illustrated in FIGS. 34--37.
A standoff arm 124 of transversely circular, longitudinally tapered
configuration has a body 126 provided with a series of radially
outwardly projecting, longitudinally spaced, integral skirts 128.
The larger diameter end of the body 126 is supported by a base
member 130 adapted for attachment to a line pole (not shown) or the
like. A fitting 132 is secured to the outboard end 134 of the arm
124 and is integrally formed with the lower jaw of a conductor
clamp 136 which receives and supports a conductor 138 therein.
The body 126 is of synthetic resin material as in the previous
embodiments and contains three relatively telescoped, nested rod
components 140, 142, and 144. The inner, nested ends of the rod
components 140--144 are received within a cylindrical bore 146 in
the base member 130, it being appreciated that the short length of
the outer rod component 140 and the intermediate length of the
component 142 present longitudinal rod sections of successively
reduced diameter toward the outboard end 134. The figures clearly
show, however, that the rod components occupy a substantial portion
of the available cross-sectional area of the arm 124, thereby
providing a major load-bearing member for both tensile and
compressive forces in the arm 124. As in previous embodiments, the
rod components 140--144 are preferably composed of an epoxy
synthetic resin reinforced with longitudinally oriented glass
fibers.
In conclusion, it should be appreciated that the transverse
cross-sectional area of the rods utilized in the present invention
is constant in all of the constructions illustrated, thus
permitting the use of cylindrical elements in a majority of the
forms of the invention. In the multiple rod forms, the rods are
spread toward the base to provide an increase in the moment of
inertia toward the base in order to resist the higher load
moment.
At the base member and the outboard end fitting, the rods of
multiple rod configurations are individually anchored, the same
anchor geometry being utilized for both the tensile and the
compressive load-bearing rods. The anchoring arrangement is
particularly advantageous in resisting tensile forces, thus it
provides good durability against a stress reversal in compressive
load-bearing rods such as produced by static uplift loads,
installation abuse, or mechanical transients. One embodiment of the
invention employs a reinforced body core for improved compression
and shear strength, thereby reducing the need for rods in the lower
half of the cross section and improving the strength of the tie
between rods in multiple rod configurations.
With respect to the base members, the concentric, stepped
configuration of the body-engaging projecting portion provides
ledges for transmittal of shear stresses independently of the rods.
This avoids a reduction in the tensile strength of the rods that
would occur if shear forces were exerted across the rods at their
zones of entrance into the anchoring wells in the base member.
* * * * *