U.S. patent number 3,571,943 [Application Number 04/836,223] was granted by the patent office on 1971-03-23 for wood drying and preserving process.
Invention is credited to Hulbert E. Sipple.
United States Patent |
3,571,943 |
Sipple |
March 23, 1971 |
**Please see images for:
( Certificate of Correction ) ** |
WOOD DRYING AND PRESERVING PROCESS
Abstract
Wood is dried by contact with an optionally
preservative-containing hydrocarbon fraction, having a boiling
range of not greater than 70.degree. F. at a temperature of from
about 125.degree. F. to about 275.degree. F. followed by exposure
to subatmospheric pressure.
Inventors: |
Sipple; Hulbert E. (Long Beach,
CA) |
Family
ID: |
25271479 |
Appl.
No.: |
04/836,223 |
Filed: |
June 23, 1969 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
34/342;
34/415 |
Current CPC
Class: |
F26B
5/04 (20130101); F26B 5/005 (20130101); F26B
2210/16 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
F26B
5/00 (20060101); F26B 5/04 (20060101); F26b
005/00 (); F26b 005/04 () |
Field of
Search: |
;34/9.5,13.8,16.5 |
Foreign Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Camby; John J.
Claims
I claim:
1. The process of drying wood comprising contacting the wood with a
liquid narrow-boiling hydrocarbon fraction having an initial
boiling point higher than the boiling point of water, at an
elevated temperature in the range of from about 140.degree. F. to
220.degree. F., and then separating the wood from the
narrow-boiling hydrocarbon and subjecting the wood to
subatmospheric pressure in the range of from about 0.2 inches of
mercury to 10 inches of mercury to remove water and residual
hydrocarbon.
2. The process according to claim 1 wherein said hydrocarbon
fraction has an initial atmospheric pressure boiling point of from
about 250.degree. F. to about 350.degree. F., an atmospheric
pressure boiling range from initial boiling point to end point of
not greater than about 70.degree. F. and a Tag Closed Cup flash
point of at least about 90.degree. F.
3. The process according to claim 2 wherein said hydrocarbon
fraction contains a major proportion of aliphatic hydrocarbons and
has a boiling range of not greater than about 60.degree. F. and
said subatmospheric pressure is less than the vapor pressure of the
hydrocarbon fraction at said elevated temperature.
4. The process according to claim 3 wherein a subatmospheric
pressure not lower than the vapor pressure of the hydrocarbon
fraction at said elevated temperature is applied during a part of
the contacting period.
5. The process of simultaneously drying and preservative treating
green and partially unseasoned wood comprising contacting the wood
with a preservative-containing hydrocarbon fraction having an
initial atmospheric pressure boiling point of from about
250.degree. F. to about 350.degree. F. and a boiling range of not
greater than about 60.degree. F. at a temperature of from about
135.degree. F. to about 250.degree. F. from about 0.5 hours to
about 12 hours and then separating the wood from said
preservative-containing hydrocarbon fraction and then subjecting
the wood to a pressure lower than the vapor pressure of the
hydrocarbon fraction at said temperature.
6. The process according to claim 5 wherein a superatmospheric
pressure is applied during the contacting of the wood with said
preservative-containing hydrocarbon fraction.
7. The process according to claim 5 wherein said preservative is
selected from the group consisting of chlorinated phenols,
betanaphtol and copper naphthenate.
8. The process according to claim 7 wherein said preservative is
pentachlorophenol.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
All wood of any commercial importance is subject to deterioration
after cutting and the degree and kind of deterioration depends on
the type of use to which the wood is put. There are, of course, a
number of natural agencies of wood deterioration, among which are
wood-destroying (decay producing) fungi, molds, wood-boring insects
such as termites and powderpost beetles, marine borers such as ship
worms, martesia and limnoran, and the different kinds of
deterioration which are normally referred to as weathering.
To combat this deterioration, before use green wood either as
lumber or timber is dried and then treated with preservative
chemical solutions. Conventionally, the drying and preservative
treating are carried out in two distinct steps.
The wood drying step is suitably effected, on a commercial scale,
either by tunnel air drying processes or by kiln drying processes,
all of which are usually very time consuming, typically talking as
long as 150 hours to produce woods having an acceptably low water
content. Air drying by prolonged yard seasoning (generally from 3
months to 3 years) is also used.
Other more rapid drying processes have been developed but have
received but very limited industry acceptance. U.S. Pat. No.
3,199,211, issued Aug. 10, 1965 to Bescher, describes a process
whereby green wood is died by contact with heated low-boiling
aliphatic hydrocarbons such as isobutane at a pressure high enough
to maintain the hydrocarbon as a liquid, followed by pressure
release to vaporize the hydrocarbon and water. Many safety
precautions must be taken to prevent explosion when using processes
of this type. Another quick drying process is described in U.S.
Pat. No. 2,892,261 issued Jun. 30, 1959 to Hutchinson, wherein
green lumber is dried by steaming followed by contact with a
nonaqueous solvent, preferably a wide-boiling oil, under conditions
so as to not absorb oil into the lumber. As pointed out in U.S.
Pat. No. 3,205,589 issued Sept. 14, 1965 to Fies et al. this type
of process has a major disadvantage in that residual oil is
deposited in the lumber which is very difficult to remove without
having to resort to conditions so harsh as to be impractical or as
to overly dehydrate the resulting wood product. Failure to remove
residual drying oil results in a wood product which is not
receptive to subsequent preservative treatment, which generally has
a surface not suitable for painting, and which tends to have a
relatively dark color. As indicated by a lack of commercial
application, these product disadvantages generally more than offset
any processing advantages of prior oil-drying processes.
For a more detailed consideration of various prior techniques for
oil drying of wood, and the attendant difficulties involved,
reference should be made to Reports No. 1665 (Revised) and R1665,
respectively, entitled "Special Methods of Seasoning Wood; Boiling
in Oily Liquids" and "Special Methods of Seasoning Wood; Boiling in
Oil" published in Apr. 1956 and Feb. 1947 by the Forest Products
Laboratory, an agency of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Forest
Service.
It has been common practice to treat the wood with preservative as
a second distinct process step following drying. A wide variety of
organic preservative materials have been employed, for example,
creosote-coal tar mixtures, beta-naphthol, chlorinated tar acids,
chloraphenols, and their derivatives and the like and inorganic
materials such as copper naphthenate. Conventionally, an aqueous or
an inexpensive wide-boiling hydrocarbon fraction solution of
preservative chemical is used so as to place the preservative in a
form that will penetrate the cells of the woods.
In this second treating step these preservative solutions are
generally forced into the wood under pressure. In a widely accepted
procedure, this treating step involves subjecting the dried wood to
a predetermined air pressure (superatmospheric or subatmospheric,
depending on whether empty cell or full cell retention is desired)
and without releasing this pressure, introducing a bath of
preservative onto the wood, then increasing the pressure and
optionally increasing the temperature and maintaining this elevated
pressure for an interval of time. Thereafter the bath of
preservative is removed from the wood and the wood is subjected to
subatmospheric pressure whereby excess preservative and some
residual preservative solvent is removed from the wood.
When high boiling organic-solvented preservative solutions are
used, sludging problems often arise such as, for example, darkening
of the resulting wood and production of an unpaintable product.
Residuums of preservative solutions having wide-boiling high
boiling range solvents often "bleed" from the treated wood.
STATEMENT OF THE INVENTION
It has now been found that green and partially unseasoned woods can
be rapidly dried by subjecting the wood to contact with a liquid
narrow-boiling hydrocarbon fraction having an initial boiling point
higher than the boiling point of water at elevated temperatures and
subatmospheric pressure and then subjecting the wood to
subatmospheric pressure in the absence of narrow-boiling liquid
hydrocarbon to remove residual water and liquid hydrocarbon. In a
preferred embodiment of the invention, preservative chemicals are
incorporated into the liquid narrow-boiling hydrocarbon fraction
and superatmospheric pressure is optionally applied while the wood
is being treated with hydrocarbon so as to promote penetration of
the preservative solution and thus effect drying and preservative
treating simultaneously in a single step process. Wood dried, and
preferably dried and preserved, using the process of the invention
is exceptionally free of discoloration and is very suitable for
painting.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Narrow-Boiling Hydrocarbon Fraction
It is essential to the process of the invention to contact the wood
with a heated liquid hydrocarbon fraction having a narrow boiling
range which is above the boiling point of water. Generally suitable
are individual aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons having
atmospheric pressure boiling points of from about 250.degree. F.
and about 400.degree. F. for example, the linear and branched
nonanes and nonylenes, decanes and decylenes, undecanes and
undecylenes, dodecanes and dodecylenes, toluene, the xylenes,
diethyl benzene and the propyl and butyl benzenes and the like and
also aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbon fractions having initial
atmospheric pressure boiling points of from about 250.degree. F. to
about 350.degree. F. and which have atmospheric pressure boiling
ranges from initial boiling point to end point of not greater than
about 70.degree. F.
Preferred among these are aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbon
fractions having Tag Closed Cup flash points of at least about
90.degree. F. and having boiling ranges of not greater than about
60.degree. F. Especially preferred among narrow-boiling aliphatic
and aromatic hydrocarbon fractions are those having Tag Closed Cup
flash points of at least about 100.degree. F., having initial
boiling points of from about 275.degree. F. to about 325.degree.
F., having boiling ranges of not greater than about 50.degree. F.
and having 90 percent overhead distillation temperatures not
greater than 30.degree. F. above initial boiling points. For
comparison, conventional mineral spirit or kerosene fractions have
boiling ranges of about 100.degree. F. (i.e. from 300--400.degree.
F. and 350--500.degree. F. respectively) and generally have a 90
percent overhead temperature substantially greater than 30.degree.
F. above initial boiling temperature.
Because of greater availability, those narrow-boiling fractions
having a predominant proportion of aliphatics are generally
preferred. When preservative chemicals are to be added to these
narrow-boiling fractions it is often desirable to use fractions
containing at least about 10 percent by volume aromatics and
preferably from about 20 to about 40 percent by volume aromatics to
enhance preservative solubility.
Preservative Chemicals
Preservative chemicals which may suitably be used in the process of
the invention include the conventional organic and inorganic
preservatives such as the chloro phenols, beta-naphthol,
chlorinated tar acids, copper naphthenate, and the like. Preferred
among these are the chlorphenols with pentachlorophenol being
especially preferred.
Other materials, such as waterproofing agents, "anticheck" agents,
"antibloom" agents, fire proofing agents and the like may also be
added to the treating solutions.
Operating Conditions
The process of the invention may be suitably used for drying and
preferably simultaneously drying and preservative treating all
types of green or partially unseasoned wood. Depending on the type
of wood being treated and the extent of drying and treating desired
it may be beneficial to vary these operating conditions to some
degree.
The wood is contacted with the narrow-boiling hydrocarbon at
elevated temperatures. Generally temperatures of from about
125.degree. F. to about 275.degree. F. may be used with
temperatures of from about 135.degree. F. to about 250.degree. F.
being very suitable and temperatures of from about 140.degree. F.
to about 220.degree. F. being preferred. These temperatures are
generally lower than conventional drying temperatures. As a result,
there is far less potential damage to the wood fibers and a lower
heating expense than with conventional processes.
The invention is not limited by the manner in which the wood is
contacted with the hydrocarbon. Generally a batch process wherein
the wood is immersed in the hydrocarbon is preferred. The wood may
be stacked in a retort prior to filling the retort with
hydrocarbon. The hydrocarbon may either be brought to operating
temperature prior to contacting with the wood or may be heated up
during contact. In any case, it is desirable to contact the wood
with the hydrocarbon at full operating temperature for at least
about 0.25 hour and preferably for from about 0.5 hour to about 12
hours. If drying alone is desired, contact times of from about 0.5
hour to about 6 hours are usually most suitable. If a preservative
is added to the hydrocarbon and thorough penetration of the wood is
desired, contact times of from about 2 hours to about 8 hours are
usually most suitable.
When drying alone is desired, it is suitable to carry out the
hydrocarbon contacting at atmospheric pressure. Alternatively, a
subatmospheric pressure, which is higher than the vapor pressure of
the hydrocarbon at the contacting temperature, may be employed for
at least a part of the contacting period. When especially dense,
hard to penetrate woods such as mountain spruce are dried it may be
desirable to increase contacting time.
When, in addition to drying, preserving is desired, it is generally
advisable to apply superatmospheric pressure during at least a part
of the hydrocarbon contacting. The amount of pressure is not
critical, with conventional preserving pressures, such as from
about 10 to about 250 p.s.i.g., being very suitable.
Following contact with the hydrocarbon the wood is removed
therefrom by any suitable means, for example, by lifting the wood
from the hydrocarbon or by pumping the hydrocarbon from the
treating vessel. With the wood still approximately at the treating
temperature, subatmospheric pressure (vacuum) is applied to the
wood and the wood is then permitted to gradually cool. The
subatmospheric pressure employed is suitably selected lower than
the vapor pressure of the hydrocarbon fraction used at the treating
temperature. Subatmospheric pressures of from about 0.2 inches of
mercury to about 20 inches of mercury absolute may be employed with
subatmospheric pressures intermediate about 0.5 inches of mercury
and about 10 inches of mercury absolute being preferred. More than
one subatmospheric pressure may be applied, for example, a higher
pressure being used initially followed by a lower pressure.
Subatmospheric pressure is initially applied at about the treating
temperature, which temperature may be maintained if desired. While
the wood is later cooled, the subatmospheric pressure is preferably
continued. Generally, the subatmospheric pressure is suitably
applied for a total of from about 0.5 hours to about 24 hours
depending on the degree of drying and hydrocarbon removal desired.
Very good wood products, having low water contents and no evidence
of solvent bleeding are produced from most woods when
subatmospheric pressure is applied for from about 1 hour to about
12 hours.
The process of the invention will be further described by the
following examples.
EXAMPLE I
Fourteen untreated Douglas fir poles, averaging 12 inches in
diameter, having moisture contents varying from stumpgreen 79
percent by weight to 25 percent were placed in a commercial scale
retort. Approximately 25,000 gallons of treating solution were then
added at ambient pressure and temperature so as to totally submerge
the poles. The treating solution was composed of 5 percent by
weight of pentachlorophenol, 6.25 percent by weight of an water
repellent additive concentrate marketed by Chapman Chemical Co. and
88.75 percent by weight of a narrow-boiling hydrocarbon fraction
having a boiling range of from 308 to 350.degree. F. and a Tag
Closed Cup flash point of about 104.degree. F. containing about 30
percent by volume aromatics and the remainder aliphatics. The
temperature of the retort was then gradually raised to 170.degree.
F. over a period of 1 hour. After attaining this temperature at
ambient pressure, the retort absolute pressure was reduced to 7
inches of mercury. After 6 hours at these conditions, the treating
solution was pumped out of the retort, and the pressure further
lowered to 3 inches of mercury absolute, where it was maintained
for an additional 4 hours, still at 170.degree. F. Vacuum was then
gradually broken while the retort was cooled. Total heating time
was 11 hours. The poles were removed and inspected immediately
following cooling. The wood surface presented a superior
appearance, being of light color, and giving the appearance of
being freshly kiln-dried. Two different commercial paints were
applied to sample poles immediately following cooling. The paints
dried normally, adhered well and even after several months showed
no lack of adhesion or discoloration, indicative of preservative
bleeding.
Core samples were taken from the poles before and after single-step
treatment. The moisture contents of these samples were measured,
representative results are given in Table I. ##SPC1##
Especially green poles, for example Sample A, in Table I, showed
the most pronounced drying. Poles containing from 20 percent to 30
percent initial moisture showed little moisture change by the
treatment. Although no efforts were taken to promote preservative
penetration, such as by application of pressure during treatment,
substantial penetration was noted, in some cases complete sapwood
penetration was observed.
EXAMPLES II & III
These Examples illustrate the use of pressure with preservative
solutions containing narrow-boiling range solvents according to the
invention, and illustrate the criticality of narrow-boiling
solvents.
A practical size retort was loaded with kiln dried lumber (coastal
fir and Ponderosa pine), including 2.times.4s, 133 5s and
4.times.4s. Sufficient treating solution to submerge the lumber was
then added at ambient temperature and pressure. A treating solution
identical to that used in Example I was used. At atmospheric
pressure the temperature was slowly raised to about 200.degree. F.
and there maintained for 3 hours, 110 p.s.i.g. pressure was then
applied. The treating solution was then pumped out of the retort
and the pressure was lowered to atmospheric. Then simultaneously
the retort heat was shut off, the wood being allowed to slowly
cool, and a vacuum was slowly pulled on the system eventually
reaching an absolute pressure of somewhat less than about 0.5
inches of mercury. Following 1 hour, the pressure was slowly
increased to atmospheric and the lumber was removed.
The surface of the lumber was light-colored, with a complete
absence of sludge, and very suitable for painting. Samples of
lumber were stained and then top coated with clear gloss enamel.
The enamel dried normally and exhibited no softening or
discoloration after 3 weeks room temperature storage. Other paints
were also suitably applied.
The preservative penetration was very acceptable. 0.3 pounds of
pentachlorophenol per cubic foot of wood was deposited in both
coastal fit heartwood and Ponderosa pine sapwood. There was over
three-eighth inch penetration of the fir heartwood and over 85
percent penetration of the Ponderosa pine sapwood.
The retort was loaded with a second charge of similar lumber. A
treating solution composed of 5 percent pentachlorophenol, about 6
percent of Chapman Chemical Co. additive concentrate and the
remainder (89 percent) conventional mineral spirits having a normal
100.degree. F. boiling range (about 305--400.degree. F.) was added
and the pressure-treating procedure described above was carried
out.
Following treatment, the lumber was removed, examined, and found to
be markedly less desirable than that produced in the first run. It
exhibited some pentachlorophenol blooming and tended to be somewhat
oily and resist paint. Paint when applied discolored in places,
indicating some solvent bleeding through to paint film.
The above treating experiments using the two different solvents
were repeated several times. The amount of solvent recovered during
the evacuation period was measured. When the wide boiling solvents
were used, at most 35 percent (and generally about 30 percent) of
the solvent which penetrated the lumber was recovered. When
treating solutions containing the narrow-boiling solvents were
used, as much as 60 percent (and generally at least 45 percent) of
the solvent which penetrated the lumber was recovered. This more
complete solvent recovery on a practical scale lowers processing
costs and reduces the possibility of bleeding of the treated
lumber.
* * * * *