U.S. patent number 3,571,910 [Application Number 04/712,314] was granted by the patent office on 1971-03-23 for method of making wrought aluminous metal articles.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Reynolds Metals Company. Invention is credited to Linton D. Bylund.
United States Patent |
3,571,910 |
Bylund |
March 23, 1971 |
**Please see images for:
( Certificate of Correction ) ** |
METHOD OF MAKING WROUGHT ALUMINOUS METAL ARTICLES
Abstract
Aluminum foil and other wrought articles including drawn and
ironed can bodies are produced from aluminum base alloys containing
up to about 2.5 percent iron, having a low work hardening rate
above 75 percent reduction and sufficient ductility at high cold
work levels to permit cold working to the extent of at least 90
percent without the necessity of annealing or stress relieving.
Inventors: |
Bylund; Linton D. (Chesterfield
County, VA) |
Assignee: |
Reynolds Metals Company
(Richmond, VA)
|
Family
ID: |
27097985 |
Appl.
No.: |
04/712,314 |
Filed: |
January 16, 1968 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
660132 |
Aug 11, 1967 |
3397044 |
|
|
|
573776 |
Aug 8, 1966 |
|
|
|
|
379782 |
Jul 2, 1964 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
29/527.7;
148/437 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C22C
21/08 (20130101); Y10T 29/49991 (20150115) |
Current International
Class: |
C22C
21/06 (20060101); C22C 21/08 (20060101); B23k
019/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;29/527.1,527.5,527.7
;75/138 ;113/120 (H)/ |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Campbell; John F.
Assistant Examiner: Reiley; D. C.
Parent Case Text
This application is a division of copending application Ser. No.
660,132, filed Aug. 11, 1967 (now U.S. Pat. No. 3,397,044) which in
turn is continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 573,776, filed
Aug. 8, 1966, now abandoned which in turn is a continuation-in-part
of application Ser. No. 379,782, filed Jul. 2, 1964, now abandoned.
Claims
I claim:
1. The method of making wrought aluminous metal articles,
comprising the steps of adding iron to commercial purity aluminum
so as to produce an alloy consisting essentially of aluminum, from
0.6 percent to about 2.5 percent iron, by weight and about
0.05--1.0 percent total of silicon and incidental elements not
exceeding 0.25 percent each from the group consisting of copper,
manganese, magnesium, chromium, nickel, zinc and titanium, said
alloy having a low work-hardening rate in the region above 90
percent reduction; and finishing the alloy by working including
cold rolling the alloy to final gauge.
2. The method of making wrought aluminous metal articles,
comprising the steps of providing an alloy consisting essentially
of aluminum, from 0.6 percent to about 2.5 percent iron, by weight,
and about 0.05--1.0 percent total of silicon and incidental
elements not exceeding 0.25 percent each from the group consisting
of copper, manganese, magnesium, chromium, nickel, zinc and
titanium, said alloy having a low work-hardening rate in the region
about 90 reduction; and finishing the alloy by working, including
hot rolling the alloy to a hot line gauge suitable for multistand
cold rolling and rolling the alloy from said hot line gauge to a
coilable strip gauge in a plurality of cold rolling passes without
annealing the alloy between successive passes.
3. The method of claim 2, in which said finishing includes cold
rolling the alloy from a hot line gauge of about 0.125 inch in two
passes to produce strip having a thickness of about 0.02 inch.
4. The method of claim 2, in which said finishing includes rolling
said coilable strip into foil in a plurality of cold rolling passes
without annealing the strip between successive passes.
5. The method of claim 4, w in which said finishing includes
rolling the alloy from hot line gauge into foil in a plurality of
cold rolling passes without annealing the alloy between successive
passes.
6. The method of claim 5, in which said finishing includes rolling
the alloy into foil in a plurality of cold rolling passes from hot
line gauge in as-rolled condition without annealing the alloy
between successive passes.
7. The method of claim 2, including the additional step of casting
an ingot of the alloy preparatory to said hot rolling.
8. The method of claim 2, in which said finishing includes cold
rolling the alloy in said plurality of rolling passes to produce
strip having a thickness of about 0.02 inch, and, without any
thermal treatment of the strip, forming a can body therefrom by
drawing and ironing the strip, the resulting can body having a wall
thickness of about 0.007 inch.
9. The method of claim 8, including the step of annealing the alloy
at hot line gauge before cold rolling, to reduce earring of the can
body during said drawing and ironing operation.
Description
The invention concerns an aluminum alloy especially suited for
producing high strength, light gauge wrought products including
foil and cans and it also concerns a method of improving the
rollability of aluminum for producing such products.
Metal foil is widely used today in both unsupported and laminated
form for various applications such as packaging materials and the
like. Aluminum alloys 1100 or 1235 or 1145 have been employed for
this purpose, but there is an existing need for higher strength
foil products. Of the stronger aluminum alloys previously known,
most are unsuited to the requirements of packaging materials,
particularly the need for a reasonable elongation characteristic
and related physical properties in foil gauges.
In addition to metal foil products, aluminum alloys have been
employed to fabricate drawn and ironed cans. Conventional aluminum
alloys include, for instance, 3004, which contain 1.0--1.5 percent
manganese and 8--1.3 percent magnesium as the principal alloying
elements, and which develops strength in fabricated form as a
result of solid solution strengthening and work hardening. The
ductility of alloy 3004 progressively deteriorates at high cold
work levels, however, and resort is taken to various thermal
treatments in making rolled sheet stock therefrom for forming into
cans, and preparatory to such forming operations. Thus, for
example, it is conventional practice to hot roll an ingot of 3004
alloy to a thickness of about 0.105 inch followed by annealing and
then by successive cold rolling reductions, typically with at least
one intermediate annealing step, to provide sheet stock having a
thickness of about 0.02 inch, after which a final stress relieving
treatment is given prior to forming a drawn and ironed can.
The trend toward cans made of a higher strength alloy apparently is
due to expanded use of aluminum cans for carbonated beverages which
produce considerable internal pressure, thus necessitating a can
construction capable of withstanding a test pressure of at least 90
p.s.i. There are disadvantages to employing increased amounts of
alloying element, however, not the least of which is greater cost
and increased fabrication difficulties.
On the other hand, alloys of aluminum ordinarily are susceptible to
work-hardening to some extent, so that strengthening of the alloy
in finished form can be effected by cold working, either in the can
forming operation or in preparation of light-gauge can stock
suitable for forming. When producing a drawn and ironed can from
about 0.02 inch stock, moreover, with the final wall thickness to
be about 0.007 inch for example, it is readily apparent that a
reduction of about 65 percent is involved. If the metal is too hard
at the outset, the forming operation will render it unworkable and
result in tool wear or excessive earring, or may even make it
impossible to produce a satisfactory product. That is why stress
relieving or other thermal treatment has conventionally preceded
can making and other severe forming operations.
PRODUCTION OF ALUMINOUS METAL PRODUCTS SUCH AS FOIL
In accordance with the present invention for the production of
foil, it has been found that a carefully controlled addition of
iron in a commercial purity aluminum base provides an alloy having
the desired characteristics; and it has also been found that a
limitation of the copper content in such aluminum-iron alloys is
also beneficial. This is an unexpected and surprising result for
several reasons. To begin with, the addition of iron beyond a small
fraction of a percent (for purposes of grain refinement) is
ordinarily considered undesirable as promoting brittleness; and
particularly in alloys composed almost entirely of aluminum, it
would not be expected that the use of iron as the principal
alloying addition would result in a material suitable for the heavy
rolling reductions incident to producing light gauge sheet or foil.
Additionally, one type of alloy commonly utilized for foil
production typically contains about 0.10--0.2 percent copper for
achieving desired properties of the foil In its annealed condition.
Thus, the addition of iron and the restriction of copper in foil
alloys of aluminum is contrary to prior practices in this
regard.
Aluminum-iron alloys suitable for purposes of the invention in the
production of foil and other wrought articles include essentially
binary systems containing from 0.6 percent to about 2.5 percent
iron, by weight, and about 0.5--1.0 percent total of incidental
elements ordinarily present as impurities in commercial grade
aluminum of about 99 percent purity. Such alloys are conveniently
produced by adding the necessary additional quantity of iron to
ordinary reduction cell aluminum containing such incidental
impurities as silicon, iron, copper, manganese, magnesium,
chromium, nickel, zinc and titanium. Thus, the alloys may contain,
in addition to iron as the principal alloying element by weight, up
to 1 percent total of silicon and incidental elements not exceeding
0.25 percent each, preferably within the limits of about 0.05--0.3
percent silicon, up to about 0.10 percent zinc, not more than 0.10
percent copper (most preferably a maximum of 0.05 percent copper),
the others exclusive of iron preferably not exceeding about 0.05
percent each and about 0.15 percent total. In this regard, for
example, the alloy for foil products may contain at least about
0.75 percent total of iron and silicon (preferably about 1 percent)
and have an iron-to-silicon ratio of at least 5:1.
In accordance with the invention, the aforesaid aluminum-iron
alloys have been found to exhibit a particularly desirable rolling
characteristic, chiefly as a result of their unexpectedly low
work-hardening rates in the region of 90 percent reduction. This
makes possible the rolling of foil in wider widths and at
substantially heavier reductions under comparable mill conditions;
and the resulting lower work-hardened properties enable the
production of an excellent foil which is tough and ductile even in
exceedingly light gauges.
The maximum amount of iron in the alloy for purposes of the
invention is determined by such factors as formation of massive
primary crystals of an iron-aluminum intermetallic compound (e.g.,
FeA1.sub.3) during casting, resulting in casting defects or
excessively reduced ductility for rolling purposes; and increasing
iron content eventually leads to deterioration of corrosion
resistance in the resulting wrought products. Furthermore, the
higher the iron content the more difficult it becomes to utilize
recycled scrap (recovered in making or fabricating the alloy) for
the production of other alloys in which the iron content has to be
controlled, thus rendering the alloys of higher iron content less
attractive as a practical matter.
In accordance with a preferred practice of the invention,
light-gauge sheet or foil is produced from an alloy consisting
essentially of aluminum, silicon and about 0.75--1.2 percent iron,
with no more than 0.05 percent copper and up to about 0.25 percent
silicon preferably about 0.05--0.15 percent). This may be
accomplished conveniently by adding iron to commercial purity
aluminum of the requisite silicon and copper analysis, preferably
containing no more than 0.05 percent each, 0.15 percent total, of
the aforesaid incidental impurities such as zinc and manganese.
The improved characteristics of the alloy are exhibited in the
accompanying drawings, in which:
FIGS. 1 and 2 are graphical representations of data showing
physical properties (tensile strength and elongation, respectively)
of an A1-Fe alloy in accordance with the invention, compared with
standard commercial alloys 5005 and 1100 at various rolling
reductions;
FIG. 3 is a composite plot of the same properties shown in FIGS. 1
and 2, showing the effect of making a small addition of iron to an
alloy of aluminum containing a fractional percentage of magnesium;
and of magnesium; and
FIG. 4 is a similar composite plot showing the effects of increased
copper content in an alloy otherwise similar to the preferred alloy
of the present invention.
The reference alloys fall within the following percentage
composition limits: ##SPC1##
The following examples are illustrative of the invention, but are
not to be regarded as limiting.
EXAMPLE 1
The following examples are illustrative of the invention, but are
not to be regarded as limiting.
EXAMPLE 1
The aluminum-iron alloy for which the data of FIGS. 1 and 2 were
determined had the percentage composition:
0.08 Si, 0.87 Fe, 0.02 Cu, 0.013 Mn, 0.02 Zn, balance aluminum. It
can be seen from inspection of FIG. 1 that the work-hardening curve
for 5005 alloy typically rises at a progressively increasing rate
toward a peak beyond 90 percent reduction, as is the case with 1100
alloy to a lesser extent. On the other hand, a surprising
difference is exhibited by the aluminum-iron alloy, which actually
has a substantially constant work-hardening rate as the critical
heavy reductions are approached. This flattening of the curve is
particularly advantageous, of course, where cold rolling to foil
gauges is to be accomplished.
FIG. 2, on the other hand, indicates a further beneficial result
obtained with the alloy of this application. The elongation
characteristic is considerably better than that of conventional
1100 and 5005 alloys. This property renders the alloy itself better
adapted to foil manufacturing operations and also makes the
resulting foil product superior for packaging uses, in which
increased strength would be ineffective if coupled with appreciable
loss of elongation.
Other properties are presented in table 1, showing that tensile and
MULLEN bursting strength of foil made from the aluminum-iron alloy
are comparable to those of conventional material, whereas the
elongation is somewhat better. The alloy is also readily cast and
hot rolled. It is apparent, therefore, that the special alloy has
characteristics peculiarly suited for its intended use.
##SPC2##
Referring now to FIG. 3, a comparison is presented between the same
Al-Fe alloy characterized in FIGS. 1 and 2, and a closely similar
alloy further containing 0.28 percent mg. The work-hardening
(tensile) curve (a) of the latter alloy is still inferior and much
like that of ordinary 1100 alloy (although approaching the
performance of 5005 alloy which has a somewhat greater addition of
magnesium as its principal alloying element). The characteristic
elongation curve (b) likewise is less desirable than that of the
Al-Fe alloy.
In like manner, FIG. 4 shows a direct comparison between the novel
Al-Fe foil alloy and one which had the analysis 0.07 Si, 0.81 Fe,
0.15 Cu, 0.02 Zn, balance aluminum. The deleterious effect in the
latter alloy of additional copper is apparent by consideration of
the location of tensile curve (a) and elongation curve (b), again
with reference to the corresponding characteristics of the same
Al-Fe alloy as represented in FIGS. 1 and 2.
The foregoing comparisons shown graphically in FIGS. 3 and 4
emphasize the criticality of iron and copper content in relation to
other constituents in alloys made according to the invention.
Further examples of the practice of the invention are the
following:
EXAMPLE 2
a. An ingot measuring approximately 16 inches.times. 50
inches.times. 160 inches was produced in an alloy having the
aforesaid composition (i.e., 0.08 Si, 0.87 Fe, 0.02 Cu, 0.013 Mn,
0.02 Zn, balance aluminum), and the ingot was scalped, heated to
about 950--1,000.degree. F. and hot rolled to a thickness of about
0.125 inch, and then cold rolled in a three-stand mill to 0.023
inch gauge. Employing conventional foil rolling practices, the
0.023 inch strip was coil annealed (700.degree. F.) for about 6
hours, cold rolled into foil in successive passes from 0.023 inch
to 0.0099 inch, to 0.0062 inch, 0.0030 inch, 0.0011 inch, 0.00062
inch and, finally in a doubling pass (two thicknesses) to about
0.0029 inch. The foil was dry annealed in coil form (775.degree.
F.) for about 10-- 11 hours. The foil exhibited the following
properties at various stages, as indicated below: ##SPC3##
b. In like manner, an additional sample of the annealed 0.023 inch
strip was cold rolled successively to 0.012 inch, 0.0056 inch,
0.0033 inch, 0.0017 inch and, finally, in a doubling pass (two
thicknesses) to 0.0007 inch. The resulting foil was slick annealed
(525--550.degree. F. for about 2 hours). The foil properties at
various stages are indicated below: ##SPC4##
It is readily apparent from the foregoing data that in both
instances the alloy exhibited a very low work-hardening rate at
heavy cold working reductions.
EXAMPLE 3
The alloy of example 2 responded so well to conventional processing
that it was decided that to try a modified practice, omitting any
annealing of the 0.023 inch cold rolled strip prior to the foil
rolling operation.
A 20 inch.times. 66 inch.times. 93 inch ingot was prepared having a
composition 0.07 Si, 0.80 Fe, 0.01 Cu, balance substantially
aluminum (Mn, Mg, Cu, Ni, Zn, Ti less than 0.02 each). This was
reduced to a hot line gauge of about 0.100 inch, annealed at
750--800.degree. F. for about 2 hours, cold rolled in two passes to
0.023 inch and then directly rolled into foil in successive cold
rolling reductions to 0.0109 inch, 0.0077 inch, 0.0033 inch, 0.0014
inch and 0.00065 inch. The work-hardening curve was found to be
substantially flat and no difficulty was found in the cold rolling
operations. The foil was annealed at 525--550.degree. F. The foil
was to have the following properties at the various stages:
##SPC5##
EXAMPLE 4
The alloy of example 3 responded so well that it was decided to try
a further simplified practice, omitting annealing of both the hot
line gauge and the 0.023 inch cold rolled strip. A 20 inch.times.
66.times. 193 inch ingot was prepared having the composition 0.08
Si, 0.84 Fe, 0.03 Cu, balance substantially aluminum (Mn, Mg, Cu,
Ni, Zn, Ti less than 0.02 each). This was reduced to a hot line
gauge of about 0.100 inch, cold rolled in two passes to 0.023 inch,
and then directly rolled into foil in successive cold rolling
reductions to 0.012 inch, 0.0077 inch, 0.0038 inch, 0.0014 inch and
0.00073 inch. The work-hardening curve was found to be
substantially flat, and no difficulty was encountered in the cold
rolling operation. The 0.00073 inch foil was annealed at
525--550.degree. F. for about 2 hours. The foil was found to have
the following properties at the various stages indicated.
##SPC6##
The somewhat higher tensile strength in the annealed condition
compared to the preceding examples was due to the highly oriented
structure resulting from the elimination of intermediate annealing.
X-ray diffraction patterns showed that recrystallization was not
completely effected by the final annealing treatment. This
characteristic can be utilized to advantage in products requiring
higher strength such as containers (e.g. cans), fin stock (for heat
exchangers), and laminated foil composites.
EXAMPLE 5
Following the procedures of example 4 similar results were obtained
using hot line gauges of 0.110 inch and 0.125 inch, again without
any intermediate thermal treatment.
EXAMPLE 6
To explore the effect of even greater amounts of iron, additional
runs were made with alloys A and B respectively containing 1.37 and
1.60 percent iron (each having 0.08 Si, with Cu, Mn, Mg and Zn less
than 0.02 each, balance essentially A1). Reroll coils of 0.023 inch
sheet .times. 611/2 -inch width (weighing 22,258 lbs. and 12,628
lbs. respectively) were annealed and cold rolled into foil without
further annealing. It was noted that the power needed in the hot
mill was about 10 percent less than that required for rolling the
0.87 percent Fe alloy (Cf. Ex. 2).
The foil exhibited the following properties at various stages, as
indicated below: ##SPC7##
The final annealed foil produce has the following properties:
##SPC8##
PRODUCTION OF CAN BODIES AND THE LIKE
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention for the
production of articles such as drawn and ironed can bodies having a
peripheral sidewall and one end formed in a single piece, it has
been found possible to eliminate thermal treatment of aluminous
metal sheet at any thickness below about 0.100 inch, while still
providing sufficient ductility for rolling and forming operations
which involve as much as 90percent cold working and more. This is
accomplished by carefully controlling the aluminous metal
composition in relation to the fabricating practices all applied
thereto, particularly as regards the relationship between drawing
and ironing operations and the cold rolling steps immediately
preceding such operations.
In general, the practice of the invention concerns three principal
considerations: (1 ) selection of aluminous metal on the basis of
its ductility at high levels of cold work, so as to provide a
starting material which has a low work-hardening rate about 75
percent reduction and sufficient ductility in work-hardened
condition to permit cold working to the extent of at least 90
percent in one or more cold rolling passes without having to anneal
or stress relieve the metal; (2 ) inclusion in the aluminous metal,
in keeping with the above consideration, of sufficient alloying
elements to meet the strength requirements of the finished article,
including enough iron to keep the work-hardening rate low, and,
particularly in making drawn and ironed cans, to minimize die
pickup and achieve a desirable die polishing effect; and (3 )
control of the sheet rolling operation in relation to the
work-hardening effect of subsequent forming operations.
In accordance with the invention, and in keeping with the foregoing
considerations, it has been found that aluminous metal of various
types may be subjected to a fabricating operation which involves
the steps of:
a. hot rolling the metal to a hot line gauge suitable for single or
multistand cold rolling, such as between about 0.100 inch and about
0.250 inch;
b. rolling the metal from hot line gauge in one or more cold
rolling passes into coilable sheet stock of a thickness on the
order of 10--20 percent of the hot line gauge
c. forming the cold rolled sheet into a finished article, such as
by drawing and ironing to effect a further reduction of about 65
percent (the total cold working reduction from hot line gauge being
in excess of 90 percent);
d. performing the cold rolling and forming operations without the
use of a thermal treatment at any thickness of the metal below
about 0.100 inch, the metal being work-hardened in the course of
such operations and still retaining sufficient ductility for
finishing steps such as necking or flanging of can bodies.
It has also been discovered that the beneficial effects of
relatively high iron content in the essentially binary
aluminum-iron alloys previously mentioned, particularly in reducing
the work-hardening rate, are applicable with respect to alloys
containing additional alloying elements such as magnesium,
manganese, or both. Thus, novel aluminum base alloys provided in
accordance with the present invention contain 0.75--2.5 percent
iron, by weight, at least one additional alloying element from the
group consisting of 0.1--2.5 percent magnesium and 0.1--1.5 percent
manganese, up to about 1 percent total of silicon and incidental
impurities, balance about 96.5 to 99 percent aluminum. The amount
of iron included is controlled to provide an alloy having a low
work-hardening rate above 75 percent reduction and sufficient
ductility to permit cold working to the extent of at least 90
percent without the necessity of annealing or stress relieving the
alloy in the course of such cold working.
In accordance with this alloy aspect of the present invention,
typical alloy systems are the following:
a. essentially ternary Al-Fe-Mg alloys containing 0.1--2.5 percent
magnesium and 0.75--2.5 percent iron, in approximately inverse
proportions including alloys consisting essentially of about
0.75--1.2 percent iron, about 0.1--1.0 percent magnesium and up to
about 0.25 percent silicon, by weight, balance aluminum and
incidental impurities, as well as Al-Fe-Mg-Si alloys containing,
for example, as much as 1 percent silicon in addition to the iron
and magnesium;
b. essentially ternary Al-Fe-Mn alloys containing 0.1--1.5 percent
manganese and about 0.75--1.2 percent iron, preferably with a total
iron and manganese content from about 1 percent to about 2 percent
and including alloys consisting essentially of about 0.75--1.2
percent iron, about 0.25--0.8 percent manganese and up to about
0.25 percent silicon, by weight, balance aluminum and incidental
impurities, especially such of the latter alloys as contain about
1.5 percent total of iron and manganese;
c. essentially quaternary Al-Fe-Mg-Mn alloys containing both
manganese and magnesium in addition to iron, including alloys
consisting essentially of about 0.1--1.0 percent magnesium, about
0.25--0.8 percent manganese, about 0.75--1.2 percent iron and up to
about 0.4 percent silicon, by weight, balance aluminum and
incidental impurities.
In the above ternary and quaternary systems, the balance is
commercial grade aluminum of at least 99 percent purity containing
about 0.05 to 1 percent total incidental elements ordinarily
present as impurities. Ordinary commercial grade reduction cell
aluminum as defined hereinbefore can effectively be used in the
present invention.
EXAMPLE 7
A typical and conventionally known technique for making drawn and
ironed cans from aluminum alloy 3004 involves rolling to a hot line
gauge of about 0.105 inch, cold rolling to 0.0275 inch, annealing,
cold rolling to 0.0195 inch, stress relieving then forming a can
body. In contrast, due to the substantially zero work-hardening
rate of Al-Fe alloys at high work levels, the present invention
makes possible a considerably simplified practice which involves
hot rolling to about 0.125 inch, cold rolling to 0.0195 inch
without prior or intermediate annealing, then directly forming a
can body without prior stress relieving; or, alternatively, where
annealing of the 0.125 inch strip is considered desirable to
minimize earring of the drawn can, it may be included while still
omitting any subsequent thermal treatment in the course of cold
rolling operations. Additional examples of producing can stock and
the like are the following:
EXAMPLE 8
Bottle cap material is commonly produced in aluminum alloy
3003--H12, by hot rolling to about 0.135 inch, annealing, cold
rolling to about 0.024 inch, annealing again, cold rolling to 0.013
inch, annealing for a third time, cold rolling in a third stage to
0.0095 inch, and finally drawing into a cap. In accordance with the
present invention, the procedure involves simply hot rolling an
aluminum-iron type alloy to about 0.100 inch, annealing, cold
rolling all the way down to 0.008 inch without an any intermediate
thermal treatment, and drawing into a finished cap.
EXAMPLE 9
a. Using the same alloy as in example 4, coil stock suitable for
making cans and the like was produced by hot rolling the ingot to
0.100 inch reroll gauge and cold rolling to 0.023 inch without
prior or intermediate annealing. Then the strip was flat milled by
cold rolling to 0.0195 inch and, without annealing or stress
relieving, drawn into cans.
b. In like manner, another run was made which included annealing
the 0.100 inch stock at 750.degree. F. for about 2 hours prior to
cold rolling.
Typical properties of the can stock and the resulting cans produced
in the foregoing manner are tabulated below: ##SPC9##
EXAMPLE 10
Using the same ingot composition as in example 9 (also example 4 ),
reroll stock was produced by hot rolling to 0.125 inch (rather than
0.100 inch as in the preceding example), followed by cold rolling
in a three-stand mill to 0.023 inch (also without annealing). Then
the strip was flat milled by cold rolling to 0.0195 inch and,
without annealing or stress relieving, drawn into can bodies. Thus,
essentially the only difference in the practice was increased hot
line gauge compared to example 9 (a). Typical properties obtained
were as follows: ##SPC10##
Finally, as a general indication of the effective performance of
Al-Fe alloys and the fabricating practices of the invention as
applied thereto, the cold rolling of ordinary 1100 or 2 S aluminum
from a hot line gauge of 0.125 inch typically requires a three-step
reduction to 0.023 inch gauge and also an annealing treatment at
0.023 inch or some other intermediate gauge before proceeding to
lighter foil gauges. In contrast, aluminum-iron alloys of the
character described correspondingly require only two cold rolling
stages from 0.125 inch to 0.023 inch (and no annealing prior to
further rolling into foil). Thus, heavier hot line gauges can be
handled effectively in multistand cold mills.
EXAMPLE 11
Coil stock suitable for making cans and the like was produced from
an ingot having the composition 0.75 Fe, 0.58 Mn, 0.24 Mg, 0.15 Si,
incidental impurities including 0.14 Cu, 0.06 Zn and 0.02 Ti,
balance essentially aluminum, by hot rolling to 0.127 inch gauge
annealing at 650.degree. F. for 2 hours to minimize earring of the
drawn can, cold rolling to 0.0193 inch and forming into cans
without intermediate annealing or stress relieving.
Typical properties produced in the foregoing manner are tabulated
below: ##SPC11##
EXAMPLE 12
In like manner an ingot having the following composition: 0.73 Fe,
0.50 Mn, 0.30 Mg, 0.14 Si, incidental impurities including 0.09 Cu,
0.02 Zn, and 0.01 Ti, balance essentially aluminum, was hot rolled,
annealed, cold rolled and formed into cans under the conditions set
forth in example 11. The resulting can stock and cans had the
following properties: ##SPC12##
EXAMPLE 13
An ingot having the following composition: 0.75 Fe, 0.48 Mn, 0.29
Mg and 0.14 Si, incidental impurities including 0.09 Cu, 0.02 Zn
and 0.01 Ti, balance essentially aluminum, was treated in the
manner set forth in example 12 to produce can stock and drawn and
ironed cans having he the following properties: ##SPC13##
EXAMPLE 14
An ingot was prepared having a composition 0.85 Fe, 0.5 Mn, the
balance being essentially commercial grade aluminum having a purity
of at least 99 percent with incidental impurities including Mg, Cu,
Ni, Zn, and Si and Ti, the total of which did not exceed 1 percent.
Following the procedures set forth in example 11, drawn and ironed
cans of comparable characteristics are produced.
EXAMPLE 15
The procedures of example 11 are again employed using, however, an
ingot having a composition 0.95 Fe, 1.0 Mg, the balance being
essentially commercial grade aluminum having a purity of at least
99 percent with incidental impurities including Mn, Cu, Ni, Zn, Si
and Ti, the total of which did not exceed 1 percent. The resulting
drawn and ironed can cans also exhibit favorable
characteristics.
EXAMPLES 16--17
Again following the method outlined in example 11, cans are
produced from ingots of compositions tabulated below: ##SPC14##
The balance of each of the above compositions is commercial grade
aluminum of at least 99 pr purity having conventional incidental
impurities, the total of which does not exceed 1 percent.
For purposes of clarity, the following terminology used in this
application is explained below:
Hot Rolling-- Rolling carried out at elevated temperatures, usually
to convert the cast structure of an ingot to a wrought structure
and to reduce the thickness of the resultant slab preparatory to
cold rolling into strip of lighter gauge. For aluminum and its
alloys, the metal temperature during at least the first part of the
hot rolling process is well above the recrystalization temperature,
e.g. greater than 600.degree. F. and usually 750.degree.
F.--1,000.degree. F. or higher. The temperature usually drops as
the hot rolling proceeds, with the final temperature often less
than the recrystallization temperature, say
400.degree.--500.degree. F., so that some cold work is effected.
This cold work is called residual or equivalent cold work and is
designated as an "E" factor.
Cold Rolling -- Rolling carried out at temperatures lower than the
recrystallization temperature to decrease the thickness, and
causing work-hardening of the strip. The input metal temperature
for cold rolling is usually room temperature or slightly
higher.
Annealing -- A thermal treatment to effect softening of a cold
worked structure by at least partial recrystallization or by relief
of residual stresses.
While present preferred embodiments of the invention have been
described, it will be apparent to those skilled in this art that
the invention may be otherwise variously embodied and practiced
within the scope of the following claims:
* * * * *